Deferiprone or Deferoxaminevs. Combination Therapyin Patients with β-Thalassemia Major: A Case Studyin Taiwan

Combination chelation therapy

Combination chelation therapies are considered in transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients for whom monotherapy regimens have failed to achieve iron balance or intensification of iron chelation therapy is required for the rapid reduction of excess iron to avoid permanent organ damage. Combination chelation may provide a more flexible approach for individualizing chelation therapy, thereby improving tolerability, adherence, and quality of life. In principle, iron chelators can be combined with an infinite number of dosing regimens; these involve simultaneous or sequential exposure to the chelators on the same day or alternating the drugs on different days. Clinical studies have established the safety and efficacy of chelation combinations. However, real-life data with combination therapies indicate the significance of compliance for a meaningful reduction in iron overload compared to monotherapies.

An evaluation of deferiprone as twice-a-day tablets or in combination therapy for the treatment of transfusional iron overload in thalassemia syndromes

INTRODUCTION

Regular blood transfusions in patients with thalassemia syndromes can cause iron overload resulting in complications including cirrhosis, heart problems, or endocrine abnormalities. To prevent iron overload toxicity in these patients, three iron chelators are currently FDA-approved for use: deferoxamine, deferasirox, and deferiprone. In the United States, deferiprone has been approved for three times daily dosing since 2011 and has recently gained approval for twice-daily administration.

AREAS COVERED

A PubMed literature search was performed with the keywords 'deferiprone' and 'thalassemia.' Relevant original research studying deferiprone's effects on transfusional iron overload in patients with thalassemia syndromes was included. Exclusion criteria included case reports and review papers. Deferiprone is effective at reducing serum ferritin levels in patients with iron overload. Twice-daily administration provides a similar level of iron chelation as three times daily dosing with a comparable side effect profile and increased patient acceptability.

EXPERT OPINION

New studies are highlighting deferiprone's potential for combination therapy with either deferoxamine or deferasirox to improve iron chelation. Deferiprone's ability to significantly decrease cardiac and liver iron content can be utilized in other transfusion-dependent hematologic conditions, as evidenced by its recent approval for use in the United States for sickle cell disease or other anemias.

Single-center retrospective study of the effectiveness and toxicity of the oral iron chelating drugs deferiprone and deferasirox

BACKGROUND

Iron overload, resulting from blood transfusions in patients with chronic anemias, has historically been controlled with regular deferoxamine, but its parenteral requirement encouraged studies of orally-active agents, including deferasirox and deferiprone. Deferasirox, licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2005 based upon the results of randomized controlled trials, is now first-line therapy worldwide. In contrast, early investigator-initiated trials of deferiprone were prematurely terminated after investigators raised safety concerns. The FDA declined market approval of deferiprone; years later, it licensed the drug as "last resort" therapy, to be prescribed only if first-line drugs had failed. We undertook to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and toxicities of deferiprone and deferasirox in one transfusion clinic.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Under an IRB-approved study, we retrospectively inspected the electronic medical records of consented iron-loaded patients managed between 2009 and 2015 at The University Health Network (UHN), Toronto. We compared changes in liver and heart iron, adverse effects and other outcomes, in patients treated with deferiprone or deferasirox.

RESULTS

Although deferiprone was unlicensed in Canada, one-third (n = 41) of locally-transfused patients had been switched from first-line, licensed therapies (deferoxamine or deferasirox) to regimens of unlicensed deferiprone. The primary endpoint of monitoring in iron overload, hepatic iron concentration (HIC), increased (worsened) during deferiprone monotherapy (mean 10±2-18±2 mg/g; p < 0.0003), exceeding the threshold for life-threatening complications (15 mg iron/g liver) in 50% patients. During deferasirox monotherapy, mean HIC decreased (improved) (11±1-6±1 mg/g; p < 0.0001). Follow-up HICs were significantly different following deferiprone and deferasirox monotherapies (p < 0.0000002). Addition of low-dose deferoxamine (<40 mg/kg/day) to deferiprone did not result in reductions of HIC to <15 mg/g (baseline 20±4 mg/g; follow-up, 18±4 mg/g; p < 0.2) or in reduction in the proportion of patients with HIC exceeding 15 mg/g (p < 0.2). During deferiprone exposure, new diabetes mellitus, a recognized consequence of inadequate iron control, was diagnosed in 17% patients, most of whom had sustained HICs exceeding 15 mg/g for years; one woman died after 13 months of a regimen of deferiprone and low-dose deferasirox. During deferiprone exposure, serum ALT increased over baseline in 65% patients. Mean serum ALT increased 6.6-fold (p < 0.001) often persisting for years. During deferasirox exposure, mean ALT was unchanged (p < 0.84). No significant differences between treatment groups were observed in the proportions of patients estimated to have elevated cardiac iron.

CONCLUSIONS

Deferiprone showed ineffectiveness and significant toxicity in most patients. Combination with low doses of first-line therapies did not improve the effectiveness of deferiprone. Exposure to deferiprone, over six years while the drug was unlicensed, in the face of ineffectiveness and serious toxicities, demands review of the standards of local medical practice. The limited scope of regulatory approval of deferiprone, worldwide, should restrict its exposure to the few patients genuinely unable to tolerate the two effective, first-line therapies.

Survival and complication rates in patients with thalassemia major in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

While transfusion and iron chelation therapy for thalassemia major (TM) has improved dramatically in recent years, the consequences of this improvement (current rates of survival and TM-related complications) remain unknown.

METHODS

This nationwide population-based cohort study analyzed 2007-2011 data obtained from the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database.

RESULTS

After excluding those patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, we enrolled 454 patients with TM who received transfusion and chelation therapy (median age, 17.2 years). Among these patients, the mortality rate was 2.9% in 2007, 2.3% in 2008, 2.9% in 2009, 2.6% in 2010, and 0.7% in 2011. Heart was the most common target organ of TM-related complications. There were 80 patients (17.6%) with arrhythmia and 86 patients (18.9%) with congestive heart failure. Dysfunction of endocrine organs was common, and the most common endocrinopathy was hypogonadism (23.1%), followed by diabetes (21.2%). There were 75 patients (16.5%) with liver cirrhosis and 79 patients (17.4%) with osteoporosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate red blood cell transfusion and iron chelation is available to all patients with TM in Taiwan under the universal health insurance system, and has resulted in reduction of TM-related mortality to very low levels. As these patients get older, early detection of complications and adequate intervention are important to quality-of-life improvement.

A pharmaco-economic evaluation of deferasirox for treating patients with iron overload caused by transfusion-dependent thalassemia in Taiwan

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The newly available iron chelator deferasirox (Exjade, Novartis) is expected to provide better long-term clinical outcomes and improved quality of life for patients with thalassemia than its predecessor, deferoxamine (Desferal, Novartis), because of its oral tablet form.

METHODS

We used the Markov model to estimate total additional lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained with deferasirox versus deferoxamine in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia. Patients were assumed to be 2 years of age at initiation of chelation therapy. Clinical outcomes in terms of morbidity and mortality from associated complications and life expectancy for the study population were estimated using the databases of the Bureau of National Health Insurance and the Health and Vital Statistics of Taiwan. Treatment costs were based on analyses of health insurance claims for patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia. Utilities in terms of quality of life were also included in the model. The incremental cost-utility ratio of deferasirox versus deferoxamine was defined by the ratio of the difference in expected lifetime costs to the difference in QALYs. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the robustness of the results to key assumptions.

RESULTS

Patients treated with deferasirox are expected to experience a lower incidence of associated complications and obtain 2.3 QALYs (discounted) at an additional lifetime cost of US$36,291 per patient (US$15,596 per QALY). Sensitivity analyses showed that the unit drug cost of deferasirox had the greatest impact on the incremental cost-utility ratio. In addition, the incremental cost-utility ratio will increase by delaying the starting age (2 years of age in our study) of chelation therapy.

CONCLUSION

Compared with infusional deferoxamine, oral deferasirox improved clinical outcomes and quality of life in terms of iron chelation in transfusion-dependent patients with thalassemia at a reasonable cost from a healthcare perspective.

Clinical efficacy and safety evaluation of tailoring iron chelation practice in thalassaemia patients from Asia-Pacific: a subanalysis of the EPIC study of deferasirox

Although thalassaemia is highly prevalent in the Asia-Pacific region, clinical data on efficacy and safety profiles of deferasirox in patients from this region are rather limited. Recently, data from the multicentre Evaluation of Patients' Iron Chelation with Exjade (EPIC) study in 1744 patients with different anaemias has provided an opportunity to analyse 1115 thalassaemia patients, of whom 444 patients were from five countries in the Asia-Pacific region (AP) for whom thalassaemia management and choice of iron chelators were similar. Compared to the rest of the world (ROW), baseline clinical data showed that the AP group appeared to be more loaded with iron (3745.0 vs. 2822.0 ng/ml) and had a higher proportion on deferoxamine monotherapy prior to the study (82.9 vs. 58.9%). Using a starting deferasirox dose based on transfusional iron intake and tailoring it to individual patient response, clinical efficacy based on serum ferritin reduction in AP and ROW thalassaemia patients was similar. Interestingly, the AP group developed a higher incidence of drug-related skin rash compared to ROW (18.0 vs. 7.2%), which may indicate different pharmacogenetic backgrounds in the two populations. Our analysis confirms that, with appropriate adjustment of dose, deferasirox can be clinically effective across different regions, with manageable side effects.

Optimizing iron chelation strategies in beta-thalassaemia major

beta-thalassaemia has served as a paradigm for chelation management for over three decades, both in terms of defining the complications of transfusional iron overload, and demonstrating the benefits of chelation therapy. Iron chelation therapy can be used to reduce unacceptably high tissue iron levels, or to maintain current levels if these are deemed safe, by matching the rate of transfused iron. Chelation therapy should be tailored to the individual patient, based on the transfusional iron loading rate and the current level of iron load both intra- and extra-hepatically, for example in the myocardium. In general, it is preferable to prevent extra-hepatic complications by controlling the body iron load rather than attempting to rescue patients once extra-hepatic complications have developed. Deferoxamine, which has been available since the late 1970s and is given parenterally, has been shown to prolong life and decrease morbidity from iron overload in patients who comply with therapy. Deferiprone may control body iron as oral monotherapy in a variable proportion of patients but is now more frequently used in combinations with deferoxamine, either to control total levels of body iron or to reduce increased levels of myocardial iron. In this article, recent advances in the use of deferasirox, a once-daily oral iron chelator, are reviewed. Large-scale prospective trials show efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in adults and children with up to 5 years follow-up. Recent evidence suggests that deferasirox up to 30 mg/kg/day can be safely administered to patients with serum ferritin levels between 500 and 1000 mg/L, while doses above 30 mg/kg/day can be given to patients with substantial iron overload or with high transfusion rates. Further, prospective data show that myocardial iron can be effectively decreased with this chelation treatment.

Update on thalassemia treatment in Taiwan, including bone marrow transplantation, chelation therapy, and cardiomyopathy treatment effects

Over the past few decades, Taiwan has seen striking improvements in the life expectancy of its 400 registered beta-thalassemia major (beta-TM) patients due mainly to adequate transfusion regimens and effective iron chelation therapy. Since 1995, Taiwanese citizens have enjoyed universal health care through National Health Insurance (NIH), receiving comprehensive treatment at minimal cost. In 1984, a national program for thalassemia prevention, control, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was initiated. Recent data show 1- and 2-year event-free survival rates of 85 and 78%, respectively. Chelation agents like deferoxamine (DFO), deferiprone (L1) and deferasirox (DFRA) are available in Taiwan, and therapy is tailored to individuals based on drug availability and tissue distribution of iron load. Intensive chelation regimens combining L1 and DFO are recommended in patients with cardiac complications, while DFRA has been found to be effective in reducing serum ferritin, with acceptable side effects. Here, we report advances in thalassemia treatment in Taiwan and suggest treatment guidelines.

Cancer cell iron metabolism and the development of potent iron chelators as anti-tumour agents

Cancer contributes to 50% of deaths worldwide and new anti-tumour therapeutics with novel mechanisms of actions are essential to develop. Metabolic inhibitors represent an important class of anti-tumour agents and for many years, agents targeting the nutrient folate were developed for the treatment of cancer. This is because of the critical need of this factor for DNA synthesis. Similarly to folate, Fe is an essential cellular nutrient that is critical for DNA synthesis. However, in contrast to folate, there has been limited effort applied to specifically design and develop Fe chelators for the treatment of cancer. Recently, investigations have led to the generation of novel di-2-pyridylketone thiosemicarbazone (DpT) and 2-benzoylpyridine thiosemicarbazone (BpT) group of ligands that demonstrate marked and selective anti-tumour activity in vitro and also in vivo against a wide spectrum of tumours. Indeed, administration of these compounds to mice did not induce whole body Fe-depletion or disturbances in haematological or biochemical indices due to the very low doses required. The mechanism of action of these ligands includes alterations in expression of molecules involved in cell cycle control and metastasis suppression, as well as the generation of redox-active Fe complexes. This review examines the alterations in Fe metabolism in tumour cells and the systematic development of novel aroylhydrazone and thiosemicarbazone Fe chelators for cancer treatment.

Clinical hemoglobinopathies: iron, lungs and new blood

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Sickle cell disease and beta-thalassemia major are clinically significant hereditary anemias that elicit worldwide attention due to the frequency and severity of these disorders. Historically, most children who inherited these disorders died in the first decade of life. Recently, however, supportive care has extended lifespan through the fifth decade of life and beyond, with survival through early adulthood now indistinguishable from those unaffected by these disorders. As a result, chronic health impairments that significantly reduce the quality of life such as pulmonary hypertension and the consequences of transfusional iron overload have become principal challenges.

RECENT FINDINGS

We focus on important recent advances that are very likely to alter the nature of supportive care of these disorders or make it possible to identify prospectively high-risk patients who might benefit from novel therapies or even curative treatment in the form of hematopoietic cell transplantation. The availability of the latter, traditionally constrained by the requirement of a human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling donor, is very likely to be broadened as results after unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation improve.

SUMMARY

In this review, several areas that are very likely to have a significant impact in the management of patients who inherit these disorders are discussed.