Cognitive contributions to theory of mind ability in children with a traumatic head injury

Measuring mindreading in preschoolers: The perspective battery (PERBAT)

OBJECTIVE

The capacity to take another person's visual perspective is pivotal for solving mindreading tests, such as Theory of Mind (ToM) tasks, but most of them heavily rely on domain-general abilities (e.g., language, executive functions). Here we present a novel battery of visual perspective-taking tests for child neuropsychological assessment, the Perspective Battery (PERBAT), which poses a limited load on domain-general abilities.

METHODS

The battery includes four tests: i) Block Building; ii) Hide and Seek; iii) Deceptive Figures; iv) Double-Sided Shelf. We administered the PERBAT to 126 typically developing preschoolers (65 males; 3-6-year-old); the participants also performed classical tests of social cognition, language, and nonverbal abstract reasoning.

RESULTS

The scores of all the PERBAT tests were significantly and positively related with age and scores of the classical social cognition tests, but not with scores of the language and nonverbal abstract reasoning tests.

CONCLUSIONS

The PERBAT could represent a useful neuropsychological tool providing a comprehensive assessment of visual perspective-taking skills in preschool children. Future investigation is needed to examine the validity of the PERBAT with neurotypical samples across countries, race, ethnicity, and language as well as with clinical populations. Longitudinal studies are also encouraged to examine whether early visual perspective-taking weaknesses are associated with later development of mindreading skills.

Social Cognition in Paediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Recent evidence suggests social cognitive deficits may be among the most profound and disabling consequences of childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, it is only over the last decade that this area has received increasing research attention. This study aims to systematically review all studies reporting on the effects of childhood TBI on social cognition. Meta-analytic techniques were employed to determine the magnitude of social cognitive deficits in childhood TBI. Literature searches were conducted in electronic databases (Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL) to retrieve relevant articles on social cognitive outcomes of paediatric TBI published from 2007-2019. The systematic review identified fourteen eligible studies, which examined the effect of paediatric TBI on five dimensions of social cognition, including emotion recognition or perception, theory of Mind (ToM), pragmatic language, moral reasoning, and social problem solving. Of these studies, eleven articles were included in subsequent meta-analyses, which included 482 children with TBI. Meta-analysis using a random-effects model revealed non-significant differences between TBI and typically developing (TD) control groups on measures of emotion perception or recognition. In contrast, children and adolescents with TBI performed significantly worse than control groups on ToM and pragmatic language tasks, with small and medium effect sizes, respectively (Hedge's g = -0.46; -0.73). Meta-regression indicated that post-injury social cognitive deficits were not moderated by child age. While the effect of time since injury was not statistically significant, poorer social cognitive outcomes are documented soon after injury. Despite relatively intact basic social cognitive skills (i.e. emotion perception or recognition) children and adolescents with TBI are vulnerable to deficits in higher-order aspects of social cognition, including ToM and pragmatic language. These findings underscore the importance of further research, using well-validated, standardised outcome instruments, in larger paediatric TBI samples. Furthermore, longitudinal prospective studies are needed to evaluate the respective contribution of injury and non-injury factors to individual variation in outcome and recovery of social cognition after paediatric TBI.

Theory of Mind after Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review

This scoping review aims to synthesize existing literature regarding theory of mind (ToM) outcomes, the neuropathology associated with ToM outcomes, and the relationship between ToM outcomes and social functioning in children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury (TBI). We searched MEDLINE^® and PsycINFO databases to identify all literature that examined ToM following pediatric TBI until July 2019. A total of 29 articles met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the results. These articles examined a variety of aspects of ToM, which could be broadly grouped into those focused on cognitive, cognitive-affective, and pragmatic factors. The existing literature suggests that children and adolescents with TBI, compared with their typically developing peers and peers with orthopedic injuries, are more likely to have deficits in ToM. The evidence further shows that the age at which brain injury occurs contributes to ToM disruption. Neuroimaging techniques have offered crucial insights into how TBI may impact ToM performance in children and adolescents. Finally, this review provides evidence that disruption in ToM plays a role in the difficulties in social functioning demonstrated by children and adolescents with TBI. Limitations and gaps in the existing literature warrant future research in this field.

A Further Look at Reading the Mind in the Eyes-Child Version: Association With Fluid Intelligence, Receptive Language, and Intergenerational Transmission in Typically Developing School-Aged Children

A number of tasks have been developed to measure the affective theory of mind (ToM), nevertheless, recent studies found that different affective ToM tasks do not correlate with each other, suggesting that further studies on affective ToM and its measurement are needed. More in-depth knowledge of the tools that are available to assess affective ToM is needed to decide which should be used in research and in clinical practice, and how to interpret results. The current study focuses on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) primarily to investigate in a sample of 112 children the currently unexplored relationships in middle childhood between performance on the RMET and fluid intelligence. Relationships with receptive vocabulary, age, and sex were also investigated. Moreover, because studying the family's influence on children mentalization could have important implications in developing prevention and treatment interventions, this study offers a novel contribution to the field by exploring the family's influence on children's RMET performance. Although significant positive correlations were found among RMET-C performance, fluid intelligence, and receptive language, regression analysis revealed that fluid intelligence was the only predictor. No family influence was found on children's RMET performance. On the whole, results from the current study offer some support to the hypothesis that RMET-C is not a “pure” ToM task, specifically the effect of fluid intelligence on RMET performance should be taken into account when RMET is used both in research and in the clinical setting.

The reading the mind in the eyes test short form (A & B): validation and outcomes in an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis cohort

Objective: Deficits in social cognition are part of the cognitive phenotype of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This study investigated the psychometric properties and test-retest reliability of two short-form versions of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test. Method: Patients with ALS (n = 50), alongside age and IQ matched controls (n = 50) were recruited. The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) was apportioned according to previously published psychometric properties yielding two short forms. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, item difficulty, and discrimination coefficient were computed to determine the utility of the short forms. Two one-sided t-test (TOST) assessed equivalency, and a ROC curve analysis determined a cutoff for impairment. Results: Cronbach's Alpha > 0.7 was observed for the RMET Short Form A and RMET Short Form B, indicating adequate internal consistency. Both RMET Short Forms had excellent psychometric properties when discriminating between ALS patients who performed well, compared to those who did not, with an overall medium difficulty coefficient observed. The TOST found the short forms to be equivalent. Conclusion: Social cognition is an important cognitive construct in ALS, as is its measurement. This study contributes not only to the psychometric knowledge of this measure, but also to the usability, efficacy, reliability, and repeatability of two short forms.

Parent and child ratings of child behaviour following mild traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in children is most commonly associated with parent-reported child behaviour problems. The extent to which parent and child ratings align is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To examine differences in child behaviour and patterns of recovery over the first 12 months following mTBI based on parent and child self-report.

METHODS

Ninety-nine children (8-15 years) with mTBI and one of their parents completed the Behavioural Assessment Scale for Children - version 2 to assess child hyperactivity, anxiety and depression at baseline, 1, 6 and 12 months post-injury. Differences between ratings from parents and children were evaluated using Bland-Altman limits of agreement analyses. Child recovery over time was examined using mixed models repeated measures analyses.

RESULTS

Parent and child ratings for child hyperactivity, anxiety and depression differed significantly at baseline and these differences remained constant at each follow-up. Parents tended to report more child hyperactivity, anxiety and depression. Over time, parents and children reported fewer child hyperactivity and anxiety problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents and children have poor agreement in ratings of child behaviour yet there is general agreement in patterns of recovery in the year following mTBI. Findings show the importance of considering both parent and self-report of child behaviour.

A role for epistemic trust in speech-language pathology: A tutorial paper

This paper provides an introduction to epistemic trust for speech-language pathologists (SLPs). 'Epistemic trust' describes a specific form of trust that an individual places in others when learning about the world, particularly the social world. To date, the relevance of epistemic trust to SLP clinical practice has received little theoretical or empirical attention. The aim of this paper is to define epistemic trust and explain its relationship with parent-child attachment and mentalization which have, in turn, been linked with language development and use. Suggestions are made for ways in which SLPs may encourage epistemic trust in clients, emphasizing the need to establish strong therapeutic alliances. The authors conclude that epistemic trust is an important consideration for SLPs and that further research exploring the relationship between epistemic trust and language skills is needed to better understand the interplay of these variables and inform clinical practice.

Measurement of Social Cognition in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Population Based Study

Background: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease. Executive dysfunction is common in patients with ALS, with up to 50% of patients performing within an impaired range. There is evidence that social cognitive deficits associated with ALS are a function of deficits in executive function. The ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ Test is a recognized test of social cognitive function, although the reliability of this instrument remains to be established. Methodology: Patients with ALS (n = 106), and age and IQ matched controls (n = 50) were recruited and asked to perform the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test as part of an on-going population-based study of cognitive function. ALS patients were sub-stratified based on the presence, and/or extent of executive dysfunction. Results: Cronbach’s Alpha of .73 was observed, indicating good reliability on this measure. Split-half reliability analysis further confirms these findings (p = 0.826). The Reading the Mind in the Eyes test had excellent psychometric properties when discriminating between ALS patients who are cognitively intact, and those who have executive impairment, with an overall medium difficulty. There was a large magnitude significant difference between patients and controls (p< 0.001; η² = .19). Post-hoc analysis revealed that controls performed significantly higher than patients with executive impairment (p< 0.001), and patients with single executive deficits (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Executive dysfunction impacts on social cognitive performance. This study contributes not only to the psychometric knowledge of this measure, but also to the usability, efficacy, and reliability of social cognitive assessment in ALS. Using population-specific normative data, we confirm the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test is a reliable measure of social cognitive processes in ALS.