Proton scanning and X-ray beam irradiation induce distinct regulation of inflammatory cytokines in a preclinical mouse model

Combination of proton- or X-irradiation with anti-PDL1 immunotherapy in two murine oral cancers

Combining radiation therapy with immunotherapy is a strategy to improve both treatments. The purpose of this study was to compare responses for two syngeneic head and neck cancer (HNC) tumor models in mice following X-ray or proton irradiation with or without immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). MOC1 (immunogenic) and MOC2 (less immunogenic) tumors were inoculated in the right hind leg of each mouse (C57BL/6J, n = 398). Mice were injected with anti-PDL1 (10 mg/kg, twice weekly for 2 weeks), and tumors were treated with single-dose irradiation (5-30 Gy) with X-rays or protons. MOC2 tumors grew faster and were more radioresistant than MOC1 tumors, and all mice with MOC2 tumors developed metastases. Irradiation reduced the tumor volume in a dose-dependent manner. ICI alone reduced the tumor volume for MOC1 with 20% compared to controls, while no reduction was seen for MOC2. For MOC1, there was a clear treatment synergy when combining irradiation with ICI for radiation doses above 5 Gy and there was a tendency for X-rays being slightly more biologically effective compared to protons. For MOC2, there was a tendency of protons being more effective than X-rays, but both radiation types showed a small synergy when combined with ICI. Although the responses and magnitudes of the therapeutic effect varied, the optimal radiation dose for maximal synergy appeared to be in the order of 10-15 Gy, regardless of tumor model.

Acute normal tissue responses in a murine model following fractionated irradiation of the head and neck with protons or X-rays

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate acute normal tissue responses in the head and neck region following proton- or X-irradiation of a murine model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Female C57BL/6J mice were irradiated with protons (25 or 60 MeV) or X-rays (100 kV). The radiation field covered the oral cavity and the major salivary glands. For protons, two different treatment plans were used, either with the Bragg Peak in the middle of the mouse (BP) or outside the mouse (transmission mode; TM). Delivered physical doses were 41, 45, and 65 Gy given in 6, 7, and 10 fractions for BP, TM, and X-rays, respectively. Alanine dosimetry was used to assess delivered doses. Oral mucositis and dermatitis were scored using CTC v.2.0-based tables. Saliva was collected at baseline, right after end of irradiation, and at day 35.

RESULTS

The measured dose distribution for protons (TM) and X-rays was very similar. Oral mucositis appeared earlier, had a higher score and was found in a higher percentage of mice after proton irradiation compared to X-irradiation. Dermatitis, on the other hand, had a similar appearance after protons and X-rays. Compared to controls, saliva production was lower right after termination of proton- and X-irradiation. The BP group demonstrated saliva recovery compared to the TM and X-ray group at day 35.

CONCLUSION

With lower delivered doses, proton irradiation resulted in similar skin reactions and increased oral mucositis compared to X-irradiation. This indicates that the relative biological effectiveness of protons for acute tissue responses in the mouse head and neck is greater than the clinical standard of 1.1. Thus, there is a need for further investigations of the biological effect of protons in normal tissues.

Cytokine Levels in Saliva Are Associated with Salivary Gland Fibrosis and Hyposalivation in Mice after Fractionated Radiotherapy of the Head and Neck

Cytokines are mediators of inflammation that could lead to fibrosis. The aim was to monitor cytokine levels in saliva and serum after locally fractionated radiotherapy of the head and neck in mice and investigate associations with salivary gland fibrosis and hyposalivation. C57BL/6 mice were randomized to sham or X-ray irradiation of 66 Gy in 10 fractions over 5 days. Blood and saliva were collected on days -7, 5, 35, 80, and 105 following cytokine analysis. The harvested submandibular salivary gland was assessed for the presence of fibrosis. Decision tree regression analysis was used to investigate whether cytokine levels could predict late endpoints in terms of hyposalivation or fibrosis. Significant formation of fibrosis in gland tissue and reduced saliva production was found after irradiation. The pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1α, TNF, TIMP1, G-CSF, KC, and MIP-1α showed increased levels in saliva in irradiated mice and a strong correlation with late endpoints. The decision tree analysis largely separated controls from irradiated animals, with IL-1α being the strongest predictor. Pro-inflammatory cytokines in saliva, but not in serum, were associated with late endpoints. This indicates that cytokine expression in saliva is a good biomarker for local salivary gland damage with IL-1α as the strongest single predictor.

Radiation therapy-activated nanoparticle and immunotherapy: The next milestone in oncology?

Radiotherapy (RT) is a fundamental treatment at the locoregional or oligometastatic stages of cancer. In various tumors, RT effects may be optimized using synergistic combinations that enhance tumor response. Innovative strategies have been designed that explore the radiation mechanisms, at the physical, chemical and biological levels, to propose precision RT approaches. They consist in combining RT with immunotherapy to revert radiation immunosuppressive effects or to enhance radiation-induced immune defenses against the tumor to favor immunogenic cell death. Radiotherapy-activated nanoparticles are another innovation. By increasing radiation response in situ, nanoparticles improve tumor control locally, and can trigger systemic immune reactions that may be exploited to improve the systemic efficacy of RT. Strong clinical evidence of improved outcomes is now available for combinations of RT and immunotherapy on one hand and RT and nanoparticles on the other hand. The triple combination of RT, immunotherapy and nanoparticles is promising in terms of tolerance, local and systemic anti-tumor control. Yet, significant challenges remain to unravel the complexity of the multiscale mechanisms underlying response to this combination and their associated parameters. Such parameters include patient characteristics, tumor bulk and histology, radiation technique, energy, dose, fractionation, immunotherapy targets and predictive biomarkers, nanoparticle type, size, delivery (intratumoral/intravenous), distribution. The temporal combination is another critical parameter. The mechanisms of response of the combinatorial approaches are reviewed, with a focus on underlying mechanisms based on preclinical, translational and clinical studies. Opportunities for translation of current understanding into precision RT trials combined with immunotherapy and nanoparticles are also discussed.

Are charged particles a good match for combination with immunotherapy? Current knowledge and perspectives

Charged particle radiotherapy, mainly using protons and carbon ions, provides physical characteristics allowing for a volume conformal irradiation and a reduction of the integral dose to normal tissue. Carbon ion therapy additionally features an increased biological effectiveness resulting in peculiar molecular effects. Immunotherapy, mostly performed with immune checkpoint inhibitors, is nowadays considered a pillar in cancer therapy. Based on the advantageous features of charged particle radiotherapy, we review pre-clinical evidence revealing a strong potential of its combination with immunotherapy. We argue that the combination therapy deserves further investigation with the aim of translation in clinics, where a few studies have been set up already.

Electron Ultra-High Dose Rate FLASH irradiation Study Using a Clinical Linac: Linac Modification, Dosimetry and Radiobiological outcome

PURPOSE

Ultra-high dose rate FLASH irradiation (FLASH-IR) has been shown to cause less normal tissue damage compared with conventional irradiation (CONV-IR), this is known as the "FLASH effect". It has attracted immense research interest because its underlying mechanism is scarcely known. The purpose of this study was to determine whether FLASH-IR and CONV-IR induce differential inflammatory cytokine expression using a modified clinical linac.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An Elekta Synergy linac was used to deliver 6 MeV CONV-IR and modified to deliver FLASH-IR. Female FvB mice were randomly assigned to three different groups: a non-irradiated control, CONV-IR, or FLASH-IR. The FLASH-IR beam was produced by single pulses repeated manually with a 20-second interval (Strategy 1), or single-trigger multiple pulses with a 10 millisecond (ms) interval (Strategy 2). Mice were immobilized in the prone position in a custom-designed applicator with Gafchromic films positioned under the body. The prescribed doses for the mice were 6 to 18 Gy and verified using Gafchromic films. Cytokine expression of three pro-inflammatory cytokines [tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), interleukin-6 (IL-6)] and one anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) in serum samples and skin tissue were examined within 1- month post-IR.

RESULTS

The modified linac delivered radiation at an intra-pulse dose rate of around 1×10⁶ Gy/s and a dose per pulse over 2 Gy at a source-to-surface distance (SSD) of 13 to 15 cms. The achieved dose coverage was 90 - 105% of the maximum dose within -20 ∼ 20 mm in the X direction and 95% within -30 ∼ 30 mm in the Y direction. The absolute deviations between the prescribed dose and the actual dose were 2.21, 6.04, 2.09 and 2.73% for 6, 9, 12 and 15 Gy as measured by EBT3 films, respectively; and 4.00, 4.49 and 2.30% for 10, 14 and 18 Gy as measured by the EBT XD films, respectively. The reductions in the CONV-IR versus the FLASH-IR group were 4.89, 10.28, -7.8 and -22.17 % for TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6 and IL-10 in the serum on D6, respectively; 37.26, 67.16, 56.68 and -18.95% in the serum on D31, respectively; and 62.67, 35.65, 37.75 and -12.20% for TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6 and IL-10 in the skin tissue, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultra-high dose rate electron FLASH caused lower pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in serum and skin tissue which might mediate differential tissue damage between FLASH-IR and CONV-IR. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Cross-translational models of late-onset cognitive sequelae and their treatment in pediatric brain tumor survivors

Pediatric brain tumor treatments have a high success rate, but survivors are at risk of cognitive sequelae that impact long-term quality of life. We summarize recent clinical and animal model research addressing pathogenesis or evaluating candidate interventions for treatment-induced cognitive sequelae. Assayed interventions encompass a broad range of approaches, including modifications to radiotherapy, modulation of immune response, prevention of treatment-induced cell loss or promotion of cell renewal, manipulation of neuronal signaling, and lifestyle/environmental adjustments. We further emphasize the potential of neuroimaging as a key component of cross-translation to contextualize laboratory research within broader clinical findings. This cross-translational approach has the potential to accelerate discovery to improve pediatric cancer survivors' long-term quality of life.

In vivo validation and tissue sparing factor for acute damage of pencil beam scanning proton FLASH

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Preclinical studies indicate a normal tissue sparing effect using ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiation with comparable tumor response. Most data so far are based on electron beams with limited utility for human treatments. This study validates the effect of proton FLASH delivered with pencil beam scanning (PBS) in a mouse leg model of acute skin damage and quantifies the normal tissue sparing factor, the FLASH factor, through full dose response curves.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The right hind limb of CDF1 mice was irradiated with a single fraction of proton PBS in the entrance plateau of either a 244MeV conventional dose rate field or a 250MeV FLASH field. In total, 301 mice were irradiated in four separate experiments, with 7-21 mice per dose point. The endpoints were the level of acute moist desquamation to the skin of the foot within 25 days post irradiation.

RESULTS

The field duration and field dose rate were 61-107s and 0.35-0.40 Gy/s for conventional dose rate and 0.35-0.73s and 65-92 Gy/s for FLASH. Full dose response curves for five levels of acute skin damage for both conventional and FLASH dose rate revealed a distinct normal tissue sparing effect with FLASH: across all scoring levels, a 44-58% higher dose was required to give the same biological response with FLASH as compared to the conventional dose rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The normal tissue sparing effect of PBS proton FLASH was validated. The FLASH factor was quantified through full dose response curves.

Models for Translational Proton Radiobiology-From Bench to Bedside and Back

The number of proton therapy centers worldwide are increasing steadily, with more than two million cancer patients treated so far. Despite this development, pending questions on proton radiobiology still call for basic and translational preclinical research. Open issues are the on-going discussion on an energy-dependent varying proton RBE (relative biological effectiveness), a better characterization of normal tissue side effects and combination treatments with drugs originally developed for photon therapy. At the same time, novel possibilities arise, such as radioimmunotherapy, and new proton therapy schemata, such as FLASH irradiation and proton mini-beams. The study of those aspects demands for radiobiological models at different stages along the translational chain, allowing the investigation of mechanisms from the molecular level to whole organisms. Focusing on the challenges and specifics of proton research, this review summarizes the different available models, ranging from in vitro systems to animal studies of increasing complexity as well as complementing in silico approaches.

Charged Particle and Conventional Radiotherapy: Current Implications as Partner for Immunotherapy

Radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to interfere with inflammatory signals and to enhance tumor immunogenicity via, e.g., immunogenic cell death, thereby potentially augmenting the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy. Conventional RT consists predominantly of high energy photon beams. Hypofractionated RT regimens administered, e.g., by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), are increasingly investigated in combination with cancer immunotherapy within clinical trials. Despite intensive preclinical studies, the optimal dose per fraction and dose schemes for elaboration of RT induced immunogenic potential remain inconclusive. Compared to the scenario of combined immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and RT, multimodal therapies utilizing other immunotherapy principles such as adoptive transfer of immune cells, vaccination strategies, targeted immune-cytokines and agonists are underrepresented in both preclinical and clinical settings. Despite the clinical success of ICI and RT combination, e.g., prolonging overall survival in locally advanced lung cancer, curative outcomes are still not achieved for most cancer entities studied. Charged particle RT (PRT) has gained interest as it may enhance tumor immunogenicity compared to conventional RT due to its unique biological and physical properties. However, whether PRT in combination with immune therapy will elicit superior antitumor effects both locally and systemically needs to be further investigated. In this review, the immunological effects of RT in the tumor microenvironment are summarized to understand their implications for immunotherapy combinations. Attention will be given to the various immunotherapeutic interventions that have been co-administered with RT so far. Furthermore, the theoretical basis and first evidences supporting a favorable immunogenicity profile of PRT will be examined.

Resatorvid Relieves Breast Cancer Complicated with Depression by Inactivating Hippocampal Microglia Through TLR4/NF-κB/NLRP3 Signaling Pathway

Background

Breast cancer is one of the most common cancer with high risk in females all over the world. It is usually complicated with depression, which can further accelerate the development and progression of breast tumors. We aim to identify a new drug and identify its functional mechanism in the regulation of hippocampal microglia (MG) in breast cancer complicated with depression (BCCD).

Methods

The activation model of MG was established by treatments from corticosterone (CORT) or lipopolysaccharides (LPS). The inhibitory effects of resatorvid on MG were investigated by CCK-8, ROS, immunofluorescence, TUNEL, scratch test, ELISA, RT-qPCR and Western blot. BCCD animal model was established using 4T1 inflammatory breast cancer cells and CORT treatment in vitro. Open field experiment (OFE), tail suspension test (TST), ELISA, RT-qPCR and Western blot experiments were utilized to examine the effects of resatorvid on the animal model in vivo.

Results

The cell viability and migration ability of the BCCD model group were suppressed. The expressions of inflammatory factors, ROS, and the apoptotic rate of the BCCD model group were up-regulated, in contrast to the control group. The expressions related to the TLR4/NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling in the BCCD model group were also elevated. Resatorvid reversed the above changes, which showed good therapeutic effects in depression-related behavioral changes, tumor treatment, and blood–brain barrier function.

Conclusion

In summary, resatorvid inhibited the activation of hippocampal MG in BCCD by regulating TLR4/NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling pathway.