Racial and ethnic disparities in stroke outcomes: a scoping review of post-stroke disability assessment tools

Socio-Demographic and Disability Disparities in Stroke by Citizenship Status: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

This study aims to assess relationships between previous stroke diagnosis and demographic or disability status variables, stratified by U.S. citizenship status. The 2019 and 2021 National Health Interview Survey data were analyzed for both descriptive statistics and logistic regression models. Age, sex, income level, race/ethnicity, health insurance status, and indicators of disability common after stroke were predictor variables of interest. For each disability predictor variable, higher odds of having stroke were seen regardless of citizenship status, except for the 'difficulty remembering' variable. For U.S. citizens, increasing age corresponded with higher odds of stroke diagnosis. For noncitizens, odds ratios decreased from 40.3 (95% CI 38.88-41.82) for the 40-65 age group to 29.6 (95% CI 28.38-30.77) in the 80 + group, when compared with the 18-39 age reference group. Female noncitizens had higher odds of stroke, while male citizens had higher odds. Non-Hispanic Black citizens had higher odds of stroke, while the other racial/ethnic groups had higher odds for noncitizens. The results indicated the existence of several socio-demographic disparities in stroke. Notably, noncitizens experienced stroke at a younger age and reported more severe disability outcomes after stroke diagnosis than citizens.

Disability Status and Secondary Prevention Among Survivors of Stroke: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 2011 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

BACKGROUND

Among survivors of stroke, adherence to secondary prevention care is associated with decreased risk of recurrent stroke. However, not all survivors of stroke use secondary stroke prevention treatment. We examined the association between the disability status of survivors of stroke and their treatment and control of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a cross-sectional analysis of the 2011 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, we compared diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension treatment and control rates among self-reported survivors of stroke age ≥20 years with and without disability. Disability was defined as self-reporting any of 5 physical or 4 functional domains assessed using a structured questionnaire. Logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, and history of medical conditions were used to estimate associations between disability status and risk factor treatment and control. The mean age of survivors of stroke was 65.1 years, and 55.5% were female; 76% (95% CI, 72.7%-79.3%) self-reported at least 1 disability. Age-standardized treatment rates for diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension were 33.1% (95% CI, 26.9%-39.2%), 67.5% (95% CI, 62.6%-72.3%), and 78.4% (95% CI, 74.6%-82.2%), respectively. Age-standardized control rates for diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension were 86.8% (95% CI, 83.8%-89.8%), 20.5% (95% CI, 15.0%-25.9%), and 47.1% (95% CI, 42.6%-51.7%), respectively. In adjusted models, those with and without disabilities had similar odds of risk factor treatment and control.

CONCLUSIONS

In the United States, three-quarters of survivors of stroke self-reported a disability, and these patients had similar odds of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension treatment and control compared with those without disability.

Evaluating circumlocution in naming as a predictor of communicative informativeness and efficiency in discourse

Background

Discourse analyses yield quantitative measures of functional communication in aphasia. However, they are historically underutilized in clinical settings. Confrontation naming assessments are used widely clinically and have been used to estimate discourse-level production. Such work shows that naming accuracy explains moderately high proportions of variance in measures of discourse, but proportions of variance remain unexplained. We propose that the inclusion of circumlocution productions into predictive models will account for a significant amount more of the variance. Circumlocution productions at the naming-level, while they may not contain the target word, are similar to the content that contributes to discourse informativeness and efficiency. Thus, additionally measuring circumlocution may improve our ability to estimate discourse performance and functional communication.

Aim

This study aimed to test whether, after controlling for naming accuracy, the addition of a measure of circumlocution into predictive models of discourse-level informativeness and efficiency would account for a significant amount more of the variance in these discourse-level outcomes.

Methods & Procedures

Naming and discourse data from 43 people with poststroke aphasia were analyzed. Naming data were collected using 120 pictured items and discourse data were collected using two picture description prompts. Data scoring and coding yielded measures of naming accuracy, incorrect response type, communicative informativeness, and efficiency. We used robust hierarchical regression to evaluate study predictions.

Outcomes & Results

After controlling for naming accuracy, the inclusion of circumlocution into predictive models accounted for a significant amount more of the variance in both informativeness and efficiency. The subsequent inclusion of other response types, such as real word and nonword errors, did not account for a significant amount more of the variance in either outcome.

Conclusions

In addition to naming accuracy, the production of circumlocution during naming assessments may correspond with measures of informativeness and efficiency at the discourse-level. Reducing the burden of estimating patients' functional communication will increase our ability to estimate functional communication using tools that are easy to administer and interpret.

Comparison of Informational and Educational Resource Provision for Individuals Living With Traumatic Brain Injury Based on Language, Nativity, and Neighborhood

OBJECTIVE

To examine a resource provision program for individuals living with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), using a comparison of the resources provided across social differences of language, nativity, and neighborhood.

SETTING

The Rusk Rehabilitation TBI Model System (RRTBIMS) collects data longitudinally on individuals from their associated private and public hospitals, located in New York City.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 143 individuals with TBI or their family members.

DESIGN

An observational study of relative frequency of resource provision across variables of language, nativity, and neighborhood, using related-samples nonparametric analyses via Cochran's Q test.

MAIN MEASURES

Variables examined were language, place of birth, residence classification as medically underserved area/population (MUA), and resource categories.

RESULTS

Results indicate that US-born persons with TBI and those living in medically underserved communities are provided more resources than those who are born outside the United States or reside in communities identified as adequately medically served. Language was not found to be a factor.

CONCLUSION

Lessons learned from this research support the development of this resource provision program, as well as guide future programs addressing the gaps in health information resources for groups negatively impacted by social determinants of health (SDoH). An approach with immigrant participants should take steps to elicit questions and requests, or offer resources explicitly. We recommend research looking at what interpreter strategies are most effective and research on SDoH in relation to the dynamic interaction of variables in the neighborhood setting.

Associations among depression, demographic variables, and language impairments in chronic post-stroke aphasia

INTRODUCTION

Depression may influence treatment participation and outcomes of people with post-stroke aphasia, yet its prevalence and associated characteristics in aphasia are poorly understood. Using retrospective data from an overarching experimental study, we examined depressive symptoms and their relationship to demographic and language characteristics in people with chronic aphasia. As a secondary objective, we compared prevalence of depressive symptoms among the overarching study's included and excluded participants.

METHODS

We examined retrospective data from 121 individuals with chronic aphasia including depression scale scores, demographic information (sex, age, time post onset of stroke, education, race/ethnicity, and Veteran status), and scores on assessments of general and modality-specific language impairments.

RESULTS

Approximately 50% of participants reported symptoms indicative of depressive disorders: 23% indicative of major depression and 27% indicative of mild depression. Sex (males) and comparatively younger age emerged as statistically significant variables associated with depressive symptoms; naming ability was minimally associated with depressive symptoms. Time post onset of stroke, education level, race/ethnicity, Veteran status, and aphasia severity were not significantly associated with depressive symptoms. Depression-scale scores were significantly higher for individuals excluded from the overarching study compared to those who were included.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of depressive disorders in this sample was higher than rates of depression reported in the general stroke literature. Participant sex, age, and naming ability emerged as factors associated with depressive symptoms, though these links appear complex, especially given variable reports from prior research. Importantly, depressive symptoms do not appear to diminish over time for individuals with chronic aphasia. Given these results and the relatively limited documentation of depression in aphasia literature, depression remains a pressing concern for aphasia research and routine clinical care.

Aphasia severity is modulated by race and lesion size in chronic survivors: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

In stroke survivors with aphasia (SWA), differences in behavioral language performance have been observed between Black and White Americans. These racial differences in aphasia outcomes may reflect biological stroke severity, disparities in access to care, potential assessment bias, or interactions between these factors and race. Understanding the origin of disparities in aphasia outcomes is critical to any efforts to promote health equity among SWA. In this study, we explore aphasia outcomes by examining the relationship between race, socioeconomic status, and neurological factors in SWA.

METHOD

Eighty-five chronic left-hemisphere SWA (31 Black, 54 White) participated in the study. The primary aphasia outcome measure was the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R). Lesion size was measured based on manual lesion segmentations. FLAIR and T2 images were scored for severity of white matter disease. Independent sample t-tests were used to determine differences by race in education, age, income, aphasia severity, white matter disease, and lesion size. A linear regression model was used to explore factors that predicted aphasia severity on the WAB-R.

RESULT

Level of education and estimated income differed by race in our sample. For predictors of aphasia severity, the regression model revealed a significant effect of lesion size on WAB Aphasia Quotient and an interaction of race x lesion size, such that Black and White participants with small lesions had similar WAB scores, but in individuals with larger lesions, Black participants had lower WAB scores than White participants.

CONCLUSION

We suggest two explanations for the difference between Black and White SWA in the relationship between lesion size and aphasia severity. First, the impact of disparities in access to rehabilitation after stroke may be more evident when a stroke is larger and causes significant aphasia. Additionally, an assessment bias in aphasia outcome measures may be more evident with increasing severity of aphasia. Future studies should further discern the drivers of observed disparities in aphasia outcomes in order to identify opportunities to improve equity in aphasia care.

Stroke Recovery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Position Paper on Recommendations for Rehabilitation

Health care delivery shifted and adapted with the COVID-19 pandemic caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Stroke care was negatively affected across the care continuum and may lead to poor community living outcomes in those who survived a stroke during the ongoing pandemic. For instance, delays in seeking care, changes in length of stays, and shifts in discharge patterns were observed during the pandemic. Those seeking care were younger and had more severe neurologic effects from stroke. Increased strain was placed on caregivers and public health efforts, and community-wide lockdowns, albeit necessary to reduce the spread of COVID-19, had detrimental effects on treatment and recommendations to support community living outcomes. The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Stroke Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group Health and Wellness Task Force convened to (1) discuss international experiences in stroke care and rehabilitation and (2) review recently published literature on stroke care and outcomes during the pandemic. Based on the findings in the literature, the task force proposes recommendations and interdisciplinary approaches at the (1) institutional and societal level; (2) health care delivery level; and (3) individual and interpersonal level spanning across the care continuum and into the community.

Disparities in Health Care for Black Patients in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in the United States: A Narrative Review

Racial health disparities continue to disproportionately affect Black persons in the United States. Black individuals also have increased risk of worse outcomes associated with social determinants of health including socioeconomic factors such as income, education, and employment. This narrative review included studies originally spanning a period of approximately one decade (December 2009-December 2019) from online databases and with subsequent updates though June 2020. The findings to date suggest pervasive inequities across common conditions and injuries in physical medicine and rehabilitation for this group compared to other racial/ethnic groups. We found health disparities across several domains for Black persons with stroke, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, hip/knee osteoarthritis, and fractures, as well as cardiovascular and pulmonary disease. Although more research is needed, some contributing factors include low access to rehabilitation care, fewer referrals, lower utilization rates, perceived bias, and more self-reliance, even after adjusting for hospital characteristics, age, disease severity, and relevant socioeconomic variables. Some studies found that Black individuals were less likely to receive care that was concordant with clinical guidelines per the reported literature. Our review highlights many gaps in the literature on racial disparities that are particularly notable in cardiac, pulmonary, and critical care rehabilitation. Clinicians, researchers, and policy makers should therefore consider race and ethnicity as important factors as we strive to optimize rehabilitation care for an increasingly diverse U.S. population.

Comparison of Three Instruments for Activity Disability in Acute Ischemic Stroke Survivors

BACKGROUND

Disabilities in physical activity and functional independence affect the early rehabilitation of stroke survivors. Moreover, a good instrument for assessing activity disability allows accurate assessment of physical disability and assists in prognosis determination.

OBJECTIVE

To compare three assessment tools for physical activity in acute-phase stroke survivors.

METHODS

We conducted this prospective observational study at an affiliated hospital of a Medical University in Shanghai, China, from June 2018 to November 2019. We administered three instruments to all patients during post-stroke days 5-7, including the Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), and modified Rankin scale (mRs). We analyzed correlations among the aforementioned scales and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) using Spearman's rank-order correlations test. Univariate analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. We used a binary logistic regression model to assess the association between the NIHSS (30 days) and patient-related variables. Finally, we used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to assess the predictive value of the multivariate regression models.

RESULTS

There was a high correlation among the three instruments; furthermore, the MBI had a higher correlation with the NIHSS (days 5-7). The NIHSS (day 30) was correlated with thrombolysis. ROC analysis revealed that the mRs-measured disability level had the highest predictive value of short-term stroke severity (30 days).

CONCLUSION

The MBI was the best scale for measuring disability in physical activity, whereas the mRs showed better accuracy in short-term prediction of stroke severity.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment Within a Telestroke Network

Background: The growth of telestroke services expanded the reach of acute stroke treatment. However, ethnic disparities in receiving such treatment have not been fully assessed. Materials and Methods: We reviewed prospectively maintained data on patients evaluated through the Medical University of South Carolina telestroke program between January 2016 and November 2018. Outcomes included odds of receiving intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), receiving mechanical thrombectomy (MT), and achieving door-to-needle (DTN) time ≤60 and ≤45 min among patients receiving tPA. We used logistic regression to analyze the contribution of race/ethnicity. Results: We included 2,977 patients, of whom 1,093 (36.7%) identified as nonwhite; of these, 1,048 patients (95.9%) identified as black or African American. Significantly more nonwhite patients were seen at a primary stroke center (PSC) (68.4% vs. 52.3% in whites, p < 0.001). However, white patients had significantly higher odds of receiving tPA (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, confidence interval [95% CI] 1.17-1.84). There was no significant difference in receiving MT between races. Among patients receiving tPA, whites had higher odds of DTN ≤45 min (OR 1.76, 1.20-2.57) and ≤60 min (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.31-2.66). Conclusions: White patients had better odds achieving DTN ≤45 min and DTN ≤60 min if receiving tPA within a telestroke setting, as well as higher odds of receiving tPA, even after adjustment for comorbidities. This was noted despite white patients having less access to PSCs. However, larger scale studies are needed to further study the impact of ethnic disparities.

Racial and ethnic differences in post-stroke subjective cognitive decline exist

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic minorities consistently demonstrate disparate post-stroke outcomes. However, there is a paucity of literature related to whether this disparity exists specifically in post-stroke cognitive decline.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if racial and ethnic disparities exist in post-stroke subjective cognitive decline (SCD) among non-Hispanic Blacks (Blacks), American Indians or Alaska Natives (AI/ANs), Hispanics, and non-Hispanic Whites (Whites) in the United States using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was completed using the 2016 BRFSS data in adults who self-reported stroke and SCD. Descriptive statistics were completed for baseline comparisons using chi squared tests for categorical variables. A binary logistic regression controlling for baseline differences was completed to examine racial and ethnic differences in SCD.

RESULTS

Significant differences in SCD were identified across all racial and ethnic groups. When compared to Whites, Blacks, AI/ANs, and Hispanics more frequently reported worsening confusion or memory loss that interfered with day-to-day activities and the ability to work, volunteer, and engage in social activities outside of the home. AI/ANs who reported SCD were more likely than Whites to have help available. Hispanic persons with SCD or their family members were most likely to discuss SCD with a healthcare provider.

CONCLUSION

Although persons from all racial and ethnic groups in this study experienced some degree of SCD, Blacks, AI/ANs, and Hispanics most frequently reported worsening confusion or memory loss impacting engagement in day-to-day activities and the ability to work, volunteer, and engage in social activities outside of the home.