Ultrarapid opiate detoxification

Opioid maintenance, weaning and detoxification techniques: where we have been, where we are now and what the future holds

SUMMARY Medically supervised opioid withdrawal is a complex and constantly evolving exercise in multimodal therapy that draws from the expertise of a variety of clinical specialties. Acute substitution and weaning has been performed utilizing opioid agonists, partial agonists (e.g., buprenorphine), mixed agonist/antagonists (e.g., Suboxone®), and α2 adrenergic agonists. While thousands of patients are being treated with these 'classic' opioid-withdrawal techniques, traditional treatment approaches are being challenged by the emergence of innovative techniques based on an understanding of the neurochemistry of addiction. Pharmacotherapy with controlled withdrawal is currently the most reliable method of opioid detoxification, but, as translational medicine continues to advance and genomic markers for opioid sensitivity and dependence are identified, the future shows great potential for growth and change.

Naltrexone maintenance for heroin dependence: uptake, attrition and retention

With naltrexone registered only recently in Australia in 1999, it is important to examine the rate of uptake of naltrexone treatment, early attrition and retention rates during treatment, in order to inform the way naltrexone is used in Australian practice. Of 317 people screened for the study, 97 participants were recruited post-withdrawal from opiates and were inducted to naltrexone after a period of at least 5 days of abstinence. While in treatment, participants received a 50-mg dose of naltrexone daily, with daily dispensing for the first 7 days, and weekly dispensing for the following 11 weeks. For the naltrexone-treated sample as a whole, the rate of uptake of naltrexone treatment was 30%, with 30% retained in treatment for the entire 12-week program. Attrition from treatment was found to be steady throughout the 12 weeks. The authors conclude that further research is required to improve withdrawal and naltrexone induction techniques and to improve medication compliance and treatment retention.

Emergency management of inadvertent accelerated opiate withdrawal in dependent opiate users

Six opiate-dependent drug users presented to the local emergency department within a 10-day period with symptoms of severe opioid withdrawal immediately following intravenous use of recently acquired street 'heroin'. The withdrawal picture was similar to that described in patients undergoing rapid opioid detoxification, suggesting that the substance injected was contaminated with an opiate antagonist. A number of potential compounds are discussed, including naltrexone and buprenorphine, and recommendations for the medical management of severe opiate withdrawal within an emergency setting are outlined. [Lubman DI, Koutsogiannis Z, Kronborg I. Emergency management of inadvertent accelerated opiate withdrawal in dependent opiate users.

Pharmacologic treatments for opioid dependence: detoxification and maintenance options

While opioid dependence has more treatment agents available than other abused drugs, none are curative. They can, however, markedly diminish withdrawal symptoms and craving, and block opioid effects due to lapses.

The most effective withdrawal method is substituting and tapering methadone or buprenorphine, α-2 Adrenergic agents can ameliorate untreated symptoms or substitute for agonists if not available. Shortening withdrawal by precipitating it with narcotic antagonists has been studied, but the methods are plagued by safety issues or persisting symptoms. Neither the withdrawal agents nor the methods are associated with better long-term outcome, which appears mostly related to post-detoxification treatment.

Excluding those with short-term habits, the best outcome occurs with long-term maintenance on methadone or buprenorphine accompanied by appropriate psychosocial interventions. Those with strong external motivation may do well on the antagonist naltrexone. Currently, optimum duration of maintenance on either is unclear. Better agents are needed to impact the brain changes related to addiction.

Opioid antagonist detoxification under anaesthesia versus traditional clonidine detoxification combined with an additional week of psychosocial support: a randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

While detoxification under anaesthesia accelerates the detoxification procedure, there is a lack of randomised clinical trials evaluating its effectiveness compared to traditional detoxification procedures, and a lack of data on long-term abstinence.

METHODS

Prospective randomised clinical trial. Analysis by intention to treat and per protocol.

SETTING

Specialised substance abuse unit in a psychiatric teaching hospital and an intensive care unit of a general hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy patients with opiate mono-dependence requesting detoxification: 36 randomised to RODA (treatment as allocated received by 26) and 34 randomised to classical clonidine detoxification (treatment as allocated received by 21).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Successful detoxification, safety and self-reported abstinence at 3, 6 and 12 months after detoxification.

RESULTS

Socio-demographics were similar in both groups at baseline. No complications were reported during or after anaesthesia. According to the intention to treat analysis, 28/36 (78%) RODA patients and 21/34 (62%) of the clonidine group successfully completed the detoxification process (p=0.14). In the intention to treat analysis, 30% of RODA patients were abstinent after 3 months compared to 14% in the clonidine group (p=0.11). No difference was found at 6 and 12 months (both groups showed less than 5% abstinence after 12 months). The per-protocol analysis showed similar results with no statistical differences either for ASI mean scores or for the SF36 questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

Although the detoxification success rate and abstinence after 3 months were slightly better for the RODA procedure compared to clonidine treatment, these differences were not statistically significant and disappeared completely after 6 and 12 months.

General anaesthesia does not improve outcome in opioid antagonist detoxification treatment: a randomized controlled trial

AIM

Opioid detoxification by administering opioid-antagonists under general anaesthesia has caused considerable controversy. This study is conducted to determine whether rapid detoxification under general anaesthesia results in higher levels of opioid abstinence than rapid detoxification without anaesthesia.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled open clinical trial from September 1999 to August 2001.

SETTING

Four addiction centres in collaboration with three general hospitals in the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 272 opioid-dependent patients whose previous attempts to abstain were unsuccessful.

INTERVENTION

Patients received rapid detoxification with general anaesthesia (RD-GA) or without general anaesthesia (RD).

MEASUREMENTS

Urine screens and an interview (EuropASI) to assess opioid abstinence; two questionnaires (SOOS, OOWS) to measure withdrawal symptoms and one to measure craving (VAS).

FINDINGS

One month after the intervention 62.8% of the patients in the RD-GA group and 60.0% in the RD group were abstinent for opioids (P = 0.71). No adverse events or complications occurred during RD; however, in the RD-GA group, five adverse events necessitated admission to a general hospital. The average 1-month cost for RD was Euros 2517 versus Euros 4439 for RD-GA.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid detoxification under general anaesthesia did not result in higher levels of opioid abstinence than rapid detoxification without anaesthesia. The cost of the former intervention was much higher.

Rapid detoxification from opioid dependence under general anaesthesia versus standard methadone tapering: abstinence rates and withdrawal distress experiences

The aim of this work was to study abstinence rates and withdrawal effects of rapid detoxification of opioid-dependents under general anaesthesia (RD-GA) compared to standard methadone tapering (SMT) using a prospective clinical trial with a follow-up of 3 months, as a preliminary study at the Novadic addiction centre in St Oedenrode and St Joseph Hospital in Veghel, the Netherlands. Thirty opioid-dependent patients took part. Outcome measures included urine toxicology screening for opiates to determine abstinence and presence of objective and subjective opioid withdrawal distress symptoms. Statistically significant differences in abstinence rate between RD-GA and SMT were present after one (RD-GA 100% vs. SMT 40%, p < 0.01) and 2 months (RD-GA 93% vs. SMT 33%, p < 0.01). After 3 months the difference in abstinence was still substantial, but no longer statistically significant (RD-GA 67% vs. SMT 33%, p = 0.14). Objective and subjective withdrawal symptoms showed largely identical outcomes and were equally low in the two groups for those who remained in the study. There was a considerably higher percentage of abstinence in the RD-GA group after 1, 2 and 3 months of follow-up accompanied by relatively mild withdrawal symptoms of shorter duration. However, if one completes SMT the data suggest a greater chance of staying clean in the long term than those completing RD-GA.

Alcohol and substance abuse

Substance abuse and dependence is a public health problem with far-reaching societal implications. The acute toxicity of substances of abuse and medical consequences of chronic use are substantial. On a more optimistic note, a great deal of progress has been made in understanding and treating substance use disorders. Expanding knowledge concerning the neurobiology of substances of abuse and substance use disorders has led to a growth in pharmacotherapeutic treatment options. A growth in understanding of behavioral processes, motivational issues, and processes of behavioral change has been important in designing new and increasingly more effective psychosocial treatments. A growing body of evidence indicates that the treatment of substance use disorders can be effective, making early diagnosis and treatment or referral increasingly important.

Ultrarapid opioid detoxification: effects on cardiopulmonary physiology, stress hormones and clinical outcomes

This study explored the acute and long-term consequences of ultrarapid opioid detoxification (URD) in individuals with opioid dependence. In an open case series, seven patients underwent URD and subsequent treatment with daily naltrexone. Structured interviews, integrated rehabilitation and hair sampling were employed in the 12-week course of longitudinal follow-up. Cardiac and pulmonary physiology did not change significantly during the anesthesia phase of URD, but plasma ACTH and cortisol levels increased 15- and 13-fold, respectively. Marked withdrawal and tachypnea in all patients and respiratory distress in one patient occurred during the acute post-anesthesia phase. Withdrawal scores were significantly elevated for 3 weeks compared with baseline in the face of minimal self-reported craving for opioids. Anxiety, depression and vegetative symptoms improved gradually. Four patients remained abstinent of opioid use, two reported a brief period of opioid intake and one relapsed into daily opioid consumption. Given its effect on breathing and stress hormones, this procedure should be conducted by experienced anesthesiologists. The fact that URD and subsequent naltrexone treatment appears to cause a dissociation effect in the usual relationship between withdrawal and craving has implications for behavioral pharmacology. Further research is needed on the efficacy, safety, mechanisms and neurobiological sequelae of the procedure.