Effects of SSRI medication on heart rate and blood pressure in individuals with hypertension and depression

Developing practical recommendations for drug-disease interactions in patients with hypertension

Background

Hypertension, a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, demands proactive management as cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of death worldwide. Reducing systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels below recommended reference values of <140/90 mmHg can lead to a significant reduction of the risk of CVD and all-cause mortality. However, treatment of hypertension can be difficult and the presence of comorbidities could further complicate this treatment. Drugs used to manage these comorbidities may inadvertently have an impact on blood pressure, resulting in a phenomenon known as drug-disease interaction. This study aims to assess the safety of medication that can affect blood pressure in patients with hypertension and provide practical recommendations for healthcare professionals.

Methods

For the development of recommendations for the drug-disease interaction (DDSI) hypertension, a six-step plan that combined literature selection and multidisciplinary expert opinion was used. The process involved (1) defining the scope of the DDSI and selecting relevant drugs, (2) collecting evidence, (3) data-extraction, (4) reaching of expert consensus, (5) publication and implementation of the recommendations in healthcare systems and (6) updating the information.

Results

An increase of 10 mmHg in systolic blood pressure and 5 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure was defined as clinically relevant. Corticosteroids, danazol, and yohimbine caused a clinically relevant DDSI with hypertension. Several other drugs with warnings for hypertension in the official product information were assessed to have no clinically relevant DDSI due to minor influence or lack of data on blood pressure. Drugs with evidence for a relevant change in blood pressure which are prescribed under close monitoring of blood pressure according to clinical guidelines, were deemed to be not clinically relevant for signalling.

Conclusion

This study provides specific recommendations that can be implemented directly in clinical practice, for example, in clinical decision support systems, potentially resulting in safer drug use in patients with hypertension and better healthcare by reducing alert fatigue. Future research should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of implementation strategies and their impact on reducing unsafe use of medication in patients with hypertension.

Effects of citalopram on blood pressure control in depressive patients with hypertension: A randomized clinical trial

Introduction

Since there is a bi-directional interaction between hypertension and depression, we aimed to evaluate the effects of citalopram administration in the management of hypertension.

Methods

A randomized clinical trial was conducted on 72 patients with concomitant depression and hypertension. The intervention group (n=41) received citalopram 20 mg daily plus anti-hypertensive standard treatment, while the control group (n=31) received only the standard treatment. The study's primary endpoint was in-office blood pressure (BP) measurement at baseline and home BP monitoring in the first and second months after entering the study.

Results

There were no significant differences in baseline systolic BP (163.3±19.6 vs.164.2±20.3 mm Hg; P=0.910) and diastolic BP (94.5±13.8 vs. 88.2±14.4; P=0.071). After one month, diastolic BP (82.7±11.7 vs. 77.09±12.2; P=0.023) was significantly higher in the control group compared to the intervention group. Two months after the intervention, systolic BP (133.8±16.5 vs. 124.5±12.4; P=0.009) and diastolic BP (80.7±10.3 vs. 73.7±9.7; P=0.002) were significantly decreased in the intervention group compared to the control group.

Conclusion

This study supported the beneficial effects of citalopram in lowering BP in patients with concomitant depression and hypertension.

A meta-analysis on the association between SSRIs and blood pressure in patients with CVD and depression

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aimed to explore the association between selective serotonine reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and blood pressure in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and depression.

METHOD

This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022368655) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020. The databases included PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE. The inclusion date was from the inception date through Oct. 26, 2022.Review Manager version 5.3 and Stata version 12.0 were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included six studies, and a total number of 149 patients with CVD and depression . In the group analysis, SSRIs treatment had no effect on the systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD = 1.01, 95%CI:-2.88, 4.90, P = 0.61) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (MD = 0.64, 95%CI:-1.03, 2.31, P = 0.45). In the subgroup analysis, SSRIs treatment had no effect on SBP for patients with hypertension (MD = -8.02, 95%CI:-16.84, 0.81, P = 0.08), and patients with other CVD (MD = 3.18, 95%CI:-1.15, 7.52, P = 0.15). For patients with hypertension, SSRIs treatment significantly lowered DBP (MD = -5.75, 95%CI:-10.84, -0.67, P = 0.03). But SSRIs treatment had no impact on DBP for patients with other CVD (MD = 1.41, 95%CI:-0.36, 3.18, P = 0.12). Subgroup analysis of the treatment period and the country had no significant impact on SBP and DBP. In the sensitivity analysis, there was no significant change after omitting one study in both SBP and DBP group analysis. Egger's test showed no publication bias of SBP (P = 0.183) and DBP group analysis (P = 0.392).

CONCLUSION

SSRIs help to lower DBP in hypertensive patients with depression. The potential pathophysiological mechanisms may lie in serotonin function, sympathetic activation and genetic heterogeneity. Further clinic and experimental researches need to be conducted on SSRIs and blood pressure.

Cardiovascular adverse reactions associated with escitalopram in patients with underlying cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Despite the anticipated efficacy of escitalopram in treating depression and anxiety in individuals with preexisting cardiovascular conditions, persistent concerns regarding its adverse effects have emerged. In this systematic review, we aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular safety profile of escitalopram compared with that of placebo in patients with underlying cardiovascular disease.

Methods

We used a predefined search strategy in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify studies evaluating adverse cardiovascular reactions to escitalopram in patients with underlying cardiovascular disease. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that provided results on cardiovascular safety outcomes were included. Two independent reviewers screened the abstracts and full texts of the individual studies. The risk of bias was assessed using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

Results

The primary outcomes were the frequency of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), QTc prolongation, and discontinuation of study medication. We identified 5 RCTs with 773 participants who met the inclusion criteria. Escitalopram was not associated with significantly increased risk of MACE (risk ratio [RR] = 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80 to 4.26; I2 0%; 5 RCTs; n = 773, moderate certainty of evidence), discontinuation of study medication (RR = 1.03; 95% CI 0.84-1.26; I2 0%; 5 RCTs; n = 773, low certainty of evidence), and QTc prolongation (RR = 1.20; 95% CI 0.76-1.90; I2 0%; 4 RCTs; n = 646, low certainty of evidence).

Conclusion

Escitalopram does not significantly increase the risk of cardiovascular adverse reactions compared with placebo in patients with underlying cardiovascular disease. However, the presence of wide CIs and the limited number of included studies highlight the need for further studies with larger sample sizes to enhance the precision and reliability of these findings.Systematic review registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews [CRD42022298181].

Integrating gene expression and clinical data to identify drug repurposing candidates for hyperlipidemia and hypertension

Discovering novel uses for existing drugs, through drug repurposing, can reduce the time, costs, and risk of failure associated with new drug development. However, prioritizing drug repurposing candidates for downstream studies remains challenging. Here, we present a high-throughput approach to identify and validate drug repurposing candidates. This approach integrates human gene expression, drug perturbation, and clinical data from publicly available resources. We apply this approach to find drug repurposing candidates for two diseases, hyperlipidemia and hypertension. We screen >21,000 compounds and replicate ten approved drugs. We also identify 25 (seven for hyperlipidemia, eighteen for hypertension) drugs approved for other indications with therapeutic effects on clinically relevant biomarkers. For five of these drugs, the therapeutic effects are replicated in the All of Us Research Program database. We anticipate our approach will enable researchers to integrate multiple publicly available datasets to identify high priority drug repurposing opportunities for human diseases.

Off-Target Effects of Antidepressants on Vascular Function and Structure

Depression emerges as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and it is thought that successful antidepressant treatment may reduce such a risk. Therefore, antidepressant treatment embodies a potential preventive measure to reduce cardiovascular events in patients with depression. Accumulating evidence indicates that antidepressants have off-target effects on vascular dysfunction and in the early stages of atherosclerosis, which form the basis for cardiovascular disease (CVD) pathogenesis. In this context, we performed a thorough review of the evidence pertaining to the effects of different classes of antidepressant medications on hemodynamic and early atherosclerosis markers. The preclinical and clinical evidence reviewed revealed a preponderance of studies assessing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), whereas other classes of antidepressants are less well-studied. Sufficient evidence supports a beneficial effect of SSRIs on vascular inflammation, endothelial function, arterial stiffening, and possibly delaying carotid atherosclerosis. In clinical studies, dissecting the hypothesized direct beneficial antidepressant effect of SSRIs on endothelial health from the global improvement upon remission of depression has proven to be difficult. However, preclinical studies armed with appropriate control groups provide evidence of molecular mechanisms linked to endothelial function that are indeed modulated by antidepressants. This suggests at least a partial direct action on vascular integrity. Further research on endothelial markers should focus on the effect of antidepressants on treatment responders versus non-responders in order to better ascertain the possible beneficial vascular effects of antidepressants, irrespective of the underlying course of depression.

Analysis of Medication Prescriptions for Hypertension in a Class 1 and Grade A Hospital in Shanxi Province

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to examine the medication prescriptions for hypertension in a class 1 and grade A hospital in Shanxi province to provide references for clinical rational drug use.

METHODS

An inpatient medical record inquiry system was used to evaluate the use of antihypertensives in a hypertensive population (age ≥ 18 years old) who received a prescription for one or more antihypertensives between January 2017 and December 2019. The hypertensive population was categorized into grades (1, 2, and 3), age groups, and different comorbidities to analyze the medication prescriptions. Drug analysis included angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin receptor antagonist (ARB), calcium channel blocker (CCB), diuretics, and beta-receptor blockers (B-RB). SPSS16.0 was used for statistical analysis, including one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA,) chi-squared test, and multifactor logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The overall control rate of blood pressure was 60.79%. The control rates of single, double, triple, and quadruple antihypertensives were 70.08%, 59.97%, 56.27%, and 45.23%, respectively. There were more cases of grade 3 than grades 1 and 2. The 18-65 years group was larger than the 66-79 years and ≥ 80 years groups. With the increase in grade, the prescription rate of the single drug decreased and the prescription rate of the combination drug increased, but this phenomenon was not obvious in different age groups. The most common drug prescribed for monotherapy was CCB; CCB combined with B-RB had the highest drug use in the double group by age or grade. Statistically significant differences were detected in the type of comorbidities between different age groups (P < 0.001), while only some differences were observed between different grades. Also, statistically significant differences were observed in the drugs prescribed for patients with hypertension with different comorbidities (P < 0.001). Factors influencing the efficiency of antihypertensives included sex, age, diabetes, heart failure, and usage of CCB and B-RB. The prescription rate of ARB combined with B-RB was relatively higher in grade 2 cases. B-RB was the primary drug for patients with diabetes, significantly increasing the blood glucose level.

CONCLUSIONS

The medication prescription of this hospital was in line with the requirements of China's hypertension prevention and treatment guidelines. The pathophysiology of patients with hypertension in different age groups, increased use of combination drugs, and rational drug requirement should be considered when prescribing drugs.

Antidepressant Drugs Effects on Blood Pressure

Individuals suffering from depressive disorders display a greater incidence of hypertension compared with the general population, despite reports of the association between depression and hypotension. This phenomenon may depend, at least in part, on the use of antidepressant drugs, which may influence blood pressure through different effects on adrenergic and serotoninergic pathways, as well as on histaminergic, dopaminergic, and cholinergic systems. This review summarizes extant literature on the effect of antidepressant drugs on blood pressure. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are characterized by limited effects on autonomic system activity and a lower impact on blood pressure. Thus, they represent the safest class-particularly among elderly and cardiovascular patients. Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, particularly venlafaxine, carry a greater risk of hypertension, possibly related to greater effects on the sympathetic nervous system. The norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine is considered a safe option because of its neutral effects on blood pressure in long-term studies, even if both hypotensive and hypertensive effects are reported. The dopamine-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor bupropion can lead to blood pressure increases, usually at high doses, but may also cause orthostatic hypotension, especially in patients with cardiovascular diseases. The norepinephrine-serotonin modulators, mirtazapine and mianserin, have minimal effects on blood pressure but may rarely lead to orthostatic hypotension and falls. These adverse effects are also observed with the serotonin-reuptake modulators, nefazodone and trazodone, but seldomly with vortioxetine and vilazodone. Agomelatine, the only melatonergic antidepressant drug, may also have limited effects on blood pressure. Tricyclic antidepressants have been associated with increases in blood pressure, as well as orthostatic hypotension, particularly imipramine. Oral monoamine-oxidase inhibitors, less frequently skin patch formulations, have been associated with orthostatic hypotension or, conversely, with hypertensive crisis due to ingestion of tyramine-containing food (i.e., cheese reaction). Lastly, a hypertensive crisis may complicate antidepressant treatment as a part of the serotonin syndrome, also including neuromuscular, cognitive, and autonomic dysfunctions. Clinicians treating depressive patients should carefully consider their blood pressure status and cardiovascular comorbidities because of the effects of antidepressant drugs on blood pressure profiles and potential interactions with antihypertensive treatments.

Epidemiology of depressive disorders in people living with hypertension in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Better knowledge of epidemiology of depressive disorders in people living with hypertension can help to implement pertinent strategies to address its burden. The objective was to estimate the prevalence of depressive disorders and symptoms in people living with hypertension in Africa.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, African Index Medicus, African Journals OnLine were searched up to 31 January 2020, regardless of the language of publication.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included studies conducted among adult patients with hypertension (≥18 years) living in Africa and reporting the prevalence of depressive disorders and symptoms.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent investigators selected studies, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies by using the tools developed by Joanna Briggs Institute. Multivariate random-effects meta-analysis served to pool data by considering the variability between diagnostic tools used to identify patients with depressive disorders or symptoms.

RESULTS

We included 11 studies with 5299 adults with hypertension. Data were collected between 2002 and 2017, from South Africa, Nigeria, Ghana, Ethiopia and Burkina Faso. The mean age varied between 50.3 years and 59.6 years. The proportion of men ranged from 28% to 54%. The adjusted prevalence of depressive disorders taking into account the variance between diagnostic tools was 17.9% (95% CI 13.0% to 23.4%). The prevalence of depressive symptoms and major depressive symptoms was 33.3% (95% CI 9.9% to 61.6%) and 7.8% (95% CI 3.0% to 14.5%), respectively. There was heterogeneity attributable to the diagnostic tools for depressive disorders and symptoms. There was no publication bias.

CONCLUSION

Notwithstanding the representativeness lack of some (sub) regions of Africa, weakening the generalisability of findings to the entire region; depressive disorders and symptoms are prevalent in people living with hypertension in Africa, indicating that strategies from clinicians, researchers and public health makers are needed to reduce its burden in the region.

Effects of Baihe Dihuang powder on chronic stress depression rat models

Purpose

Explore the effect of Baihe Dihuang powder on chronic stress depression rat models.

Methods

Chronic stress depression rat models were established with different stimuli for 21 days. At the same time, the drug was administered for 21 consecutive days. The animals were weighed once a week after the start of the formal experiment. On the second day after the end of drug administration, conduct sugar water consumption test and open-filed box experiment, and conduct behavioral observation; At the end of behavioral testing, blood was taken from the eyeball and plasma was separated to measure MDA level and erythrocyte SOD activity; Take brain for homogenate, then measure the contents of 5-HT, NE and DA in brain tissue homogenate; Take the thymus and spleen, stained with 10% formalin fixation, embedding and HE staining, then use microscope to observe the histopathological changes.

Results

Chronic stress depression rats model replicated successfully. Each group of given drugs could increase the weight, the consumption of sugar water, and improve the behavioral score, increase erythrocytes SOD activity and decrease MDA level of plasma, increase the content of 5-HT, NE and DA of brain homogenate, and improve the pathological changes of thymus and spleen of chronic stress depression model animals.

Conclusion

Chronic stress depression rat model replicates successfully. Baihe Dihuang powder can interfere chronic stress depression rats model through different action pathways.