Immediate effect of pain neuroscience education for recent onset low back pain: an exploratory single arm trial

Additional effects of therapeutic exercise and education on manual therapy for chronic temporomandibular disorders treatment: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have evaluated the implementation of behavioral approaches in individuals with chronic temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the benefits of a behavioral approach to craniofacial pain. Second, we assessed the benefits of kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, mouth opening without pain, and forward head posture.

METHODS

Individuals with chronic TMDs were treated for five weeks. The intervention group (n = 17) underwent pain neuroscience education, manual therapy, and therapeutic exercise, whereas the control group (n = 17) underwent manual therapy only. Outcomes were evaluated immediately, at seven and 19 weeks follow-up. The assessment tools used were the Craniofacial Pain Disability Inventory, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Mandibular Range of Motion Scale, and Cervical Range of Motion Tool.

RESULTS

The interventions did not influence the differences in the improvements between the groups observed for craniofacial pain disability (inter-subject p 0.4). The intervention had a moderate influence on the improvement of kinesiophobia and catastrophizing (Inter-subject p 0.09 and 0.1 respectively) with a clinically significant effect size (Estimated mean (EM) -8.6 standard deviation (SD) ±3.48 p 0.019; and EM -7.6 SD ± 5.11 p 0.15 respectively).

CONCLUSION

The behavioral approach improved catastrophizing and kinesiophobia outcomes in individuals with chronic TMDs.

Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia may underestimate task-specific fear of movement in people with and without low back pain

Introduction

The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) is commonly used to assess fear of movement (FoM) in people with low back pain (LBP). However, the TSK does not provide a task-specific measure of FoM, whereas image-based or video-based methods may do so.

Objectives

To compare the magnitude of FoM when assessed using 3 methods (TSK-11, image of lifting, video of lifting) in 3 groups of people: current LBP (LBP), recovered LBP (rLBP), and asymptomatic controls (control).

Methods

Fifty-one participants completed the TSK-11 and rated their FoM when viewing images and videos depicting people lifting objects. Low back pain and rLBP participants also completed the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Linear mixed models were used to estimate the effects of methods (TSK-11, image, video) and group (control, LBP, rLBP). Linear regression models were used to assess associations between the methods on ODI after adjusting for group. Finally, a linear mixed model was used to understand the effects of method (image, video) and load (light, heavy) on fear.

Results

In all groups, viewing images (P = 0.009) and videos (P = 0.038) elicited greater FoM than that captured by the TSK-11. Only the TSK-11 was significantly associated with the ODI (P < 0.001). Finally, there was a significant main effect of load on fear (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Fear of specific movements (eg, lifting) may be better measured using task-specific measures, such as images and videos, than by task-generic questionnaires, such as the TSK-11. Being more strongly associated with the ODI, the TSK-11 still plays an important role in understanding the impact of FoM on disability.

Management of Low Back Pain: Do Physiotherapists Know the Evidence-Based Guidelines?

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines promote bio-psychosocial management of patients suffering from low back pain (LBP). The objective of this study was to examine the current knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of physiotherapists about a guideline-adherent approach to LBP and to assess the ability of physiotherapists to recognise signs of a specific LBP in a clinical vignette.

METHODS

Physiotherapists were recruited to participate in an online study. They were asked to indicate whether they were familiar with evidence-based guidelines and then to fill in the Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS), Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ), Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (NPQ), as well as questions related to two clinical vignettes.

RESULTS

In total, 527 physiotherapists participated in this study. Only 38% reported being familiar with guidelines for the management of LBP. Sixty-three percent of the physiotherapists gave guideline-inconsistent recommendations regarding work. Only half of the physiotherapists recognised the signs of a specific LBP.

CONCLUSIONS

The high proportion of physiotherapists unfamiliar with guidelines and demonstrating attitudes and beliefs not in line with evidence-based management of LBP is concerning. It is crucial to develop efficient strategies to enhance knowledge of guidelines among physiotherapists and increase their implementation in clinical practice.

Post-amputation pain: Comparing pain presentations between adults with and without increased amputated-region sensitivity

OBJECTIVE

Among adults with persistent post-amputation pain, increased amputated-region pain sensitivity may reflect peripheral sensitization or indicate underlying central sensitization. To determine whether underlying central sensitization may contribute to increased pain sensitivity in this population, this study compared clinical signs and symptoms associated with central sensitization between adults with post-amputation pain who demonstrate or lack increased amputated-region sensitivity (as compared to reference data).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SUBJECTS

Ninety-nine adults (60 with a unilateral, transtibial amputation and post-amputation pain, 39 pain-free controls with intact limbs).

METHODS

Participants underwent pain-pressure threshold testing of amputated-region and secondary (non-amputated region) sites and completed outcome measures assessing central sensitization symptoms (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® pain intensity and interference domains, Central Sensitization Inventory). Among the full sample, the presence and frequency of specific central sensitization symptoms were evaluated. Participants with post-amputation pain were then grouped based on whether normalized, amputated-region pain-pressure thresholds fell below (i.e., sensitive) or above (i.e., non-sensitive) the 25th percentile of sex-specific reference data. Between-group differences in normalized secondary-site sensitivity were evaluated using a multivariate analysis of variance; central sensitization symptom scores were compared using a Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Noteworthy symptoms associated with central sensitization (e.g., fatigue, sleep disturbance, cognitive difficulty) were reported by 33%-62% of participants. Secondary-site pain sensitivity was greater among individuals with increased amputated-region sensitivity (n = 24) compared to peers without increased amputated-region sensitivity ([n = 36], mean difference > 1.33 standard deviation [SD], p < 0.001). Central sensitization symptom scores, however, were similar between groups (p > 0.187).

CONCLUSIONS

Participants with increased amputated-region sensitivity demonstrate generalized, secondary-site pain hypersensitivity, potentially indicating underlying central sensitization. Central sensitization symptom scores, however, were similar between groups, suggesting differences in physiological pain sensitivity may not manifest in subjective post-amputation pain descriptions.

Spreading the word: pediatric pain education from treatment to prevention

Pain affects everyone hence one can argue that it is in each individual’s interest to understand pain in order to hold correct and adaptive beliefs and attitudes about pain. In addition, chronic pain is reaching pandemic proportions and it is now well known that people living with chronic pain have a reduced life expectancy. To address and to prevent the growth of this public health disaster, we must start looking beyond adulthood. How children view pain has an impact on their behavioral coping responses which in turn predict persistent pain early in the lifespan. In addition, children who suffer from chronic pain and who are not (properly) treated for it before adolescence have an increased risk of having chronic pain during their adult life. Explaining pain to children and youth may have a tremendous impact not only on the individual child suffering from chronic pain but also on society, since the key to stop the pain pandemic may well lie in the first two decades of life. In order to facilitate the acquisition of adaptive behavioral coping responses, pain education aims to shift people’s view on pain from being an apparent threat towards being a compelling perceptual experience generated by the brain that will only arise whenever the conceivable proof of danger to the body is greater than the conceivable proof of safety to the body. Nowadays a lot of pain education material is available for adults, but it is not adapted to children’s developmental stage and therefore little or not suitable for them. An overview of the state-of-the-art pain education material for children and youth is provided here, along with its current and future areas of application as well as challenges to its development and delivery. Research on pediatric pain education is still in its infancy and many questions remain to be answered within this emerging field of investigation.

A Case-Series of Dry Needling as an Immediate Sensory Integration Intervention

BACKGROUND

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) has been associated with altered cortical mapping in the primary somatosensory cortex. Various sensory discrimination treatments have been explored to positively influence CLBP by targeting cortical maps.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if dry needling (DN) applied to patients with CLBP would yield changes in two-point discrimination (TPD) and left-right judgment (LRJ) tasks for the low back. Secondary measurements of pain and limited range of motion (ROM) was also assessed.

METHODS

A sample of 15 patients with CLBP were treated with DN to their low back. Prior to and immediately after DN, TPD, LRJ tasks, low back pain, spinal ROM, and straight leg raise (SLR) were measured.

RESULTS

Following DN, there was a significant (p < 0.005) improvement in LRJ for low back images in all measures, except accuracy for the right side. TPD significantly improved at the L3 segment with a moderate effect size. A significant improvement was found for pain and trunk ROM after DN with a large effect in changing pain of 3.33 points and improving SLR by 9.0 degrees on average, which exceeds the minimal detectable change of 5.7 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to explore if DN alters TPD and LRJ tasks in patients with CLBP. Results show an immediate significant positive change in TPD and LRJ tasks, as well as pain ratings and movement.

Effects of pain neuroscience education and rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of pain neuroscience education (PNE) versus biomedical education (BME) in a rehabilitation program following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) in patients with chronic shoulder pain.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients who participated in a rehabilitation program were randomly assigned to either an experimental PNE group (N = 16) or a control BME group (N = 13). Measurements included pain intensity at rest and in movement, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, disability and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Outcomes were evaluated at baseline and at 4 and 8 weeks after the intervention.

RESULTS

A main effect for time was observed for: intensity of pain at rest (p < .01); pain with movement (p < .01); pain catastrophizing (p < .01); kinesiophobia (p < .01); disability (p < .01); and HRQoL (p < .01). No group interactions were significant for any variable, except for pain with movement, which favored the PNE group (p = .03). Large effect sizes (ranging from d = 0.79 to d = 2.65) were found for both interventions in all outcomes.

CONCLUSION

A rehabilitation program including either PNE or BME are equally effective in improving rest pain, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, disability, and HRQoL in patients after ARCR, except for pain at movement in favor of the PNE group. The inclusion of PNE in the rehabilitation program appears to lead to clinically meaningful improvements in pain at rest in short term when treating patients with ARCR.

Effects of Pain Neuroscience Education Combined with Lumbar Stabilization Exercise on Strength and Pain in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial

Chronic low back pain that lasts more than 12 weeks causes mental and physical distress. This study investigated the effects of pain neuroscience education combined with lumbar stabilization exercises on strength, pain, flexibility, and activity disorder index in female patients with chronic low back pain. Thirty-five female patients with chronic low back pain were randomly divided into two groups: the pain neuroscience education (PNE) combined with lumbar stabilization exercises (LSEs) group (n = 18, experimental group) and the lumbar stabilization exercises alone group (n = 17, control group). The experimental group underwent PNE combined with LSEs for 30 min per session, twice per week for 8 weeks, and the control group underwent LSEs only. The primary outcomes were strength (sit-up and back-up movements), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Korean Pain Catastrophizing Scale (K-PCS), and Tampa Scale of Kinesio-phobia-11 (TSK-11) for pain. The secondary outcomes were modified–modified Schober’s test (MMST) and finger to floor test (FFT) for flexibility and activity disorder (Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire index). A significant difference was observed in the primary outcomes after intervention in the abdominal muscle strength (group difference, mean, −7.50; 95% CI, −9.111 to –5.889, F = 9.598; ANCOVA p = 0.005), the back muscle strength (group difference, mean, −9.722; 95% CI, −10.877 to –8.568, F = 7.102; ANCOVA p = 0.014), the NPRS (group difference, mean, 1.89; 95% CI,1.65 to 2.12, F = 24.286; ANCOVA p < 0.001), K-PCS (group difference, mean, 7.89; 95% CI, 7.02 to 8.76, F = 11.558; ANCOVA p = 0.003), and TSK-11 (group difference, mean, 16.79; 95% CI, 13.99 to 19.59, F = 13.179; ANCOVA p = 0.014) for pain. In the secondary outcomes, there was a significant difference in the FFT (group difference, mean, −0.66; 95%CI, −0.99 to −0.33, F = 4.327; ANCOVA p = 0.049), whereas the difference in flexibility (MMST) and activity disorder index of the secondary outcomes did not reach significance. Therefore, this study confirmed that PNE combined with LSEs is an effective intervention compared to LSE alone in improving muscle strength and pain in female patients with chronic low back pain.

[Effects of preoperative neurobiological education on postoperative outcome : A systematic review]

BACKGROUND

Pain may have a crucial impact on human quality of life. An increase in knowledge about neurobiological and neuroscientific processes alone can positively influence the subjective perception of pain as well as psychometric variables. There are different forms of preoperative patient education with the aim to explain postoperative pain. Based on current literature, preoperative biomedical education has a low level of evidence. It can increase the preoperative anxiety and stress level of patients, which has a negative impact on the postoperative outcome. In contrast, the neuroscientific understanding considers postoperative pain from the viewpoints of the plasticity of the nervous system and involves sensitizational processes in the central and peripheral nervous systems.

PURPOSE

To systematically investigate short- and long-term effects of pain neuroscience education (PNE) in patients before spine surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The literature search involved a search of medical databases according to the PI(C)O scheme, and 83 articles were shortlisted. Nine articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were finally included.

RESULTS

Preoperative pain neuroscience education can positively influence postoperative catastrophizing tendencies as well as postoperative kinesiophobia but has no influence on postoperative pain and function.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative reduction of anxiety and pain-maintaining factors mainly on the psychological and social level may have a positive effect on postoperative subjective pain evaluation, which is reflected in a reduction of anxiety, catastrophizing tendencies, and a lower utilization of postoperative health care services.

Therapeutic Education and Physiotherapy in Low Back Pain Management

BACKGROUND: Low-back pain (LBP) is one of the most common musculoskeletal problems; it is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Therapeutic patient education is a method that enables health care professionals to pass on their knowledge and experience to patients so that they can participate consciously and actively in their recovery. AIM: The present study aims to examine the effect of therapeutic education (TE) combined with a specific physiotherapy (PT) approach in people with LBP. МАTERIALS AND METHODS: This was an experimental pre- and post-study design. The study involved 25 patients, mean age 43.08 ± 12 years, divided into two groups: experimental group (EG), with TE (n =18) and control group (CG), without TE (n = 7). The PT treatment frequency and duration were consistent between groups. The patients were monitored for one month, and the intervention under supervision – face-to-face and self-monitored home-based PT have been organized. The included outcome measures were Oswestry Disability Index, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, STarT Back Screening Tools, and the movement-induced pain in the lumbar spine. RESULTS: At the end of the study improved pain-free movements in the lumbar region, functionality, reduced catastrophizing was observed in both groups. There is a tendency for better results in the EG compared to the CG in terms of functionality and pain-free movement. The subjective feeling of the catastrophizing was reduced only in the EG below the cut-off score from 45.2 ± 7.7 to 33.2 ± 3.3 points. CONCLUSION: TE in combination with PT interventions improves functional abilities, decreases the pain during movements, and the subjective perception of kinesiophobia. The results suggest TE should be included in a LBP management approach.

Hand therapists' knowledge and practice-related beliefs about pain science: A survey study

INTRODUCTION

Identifying hand therapists' knowledge and beliefs about pain can illuminate familiarity with modern pain science within hand therapy.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The primary aim was to identify hand therapists' knowledge of pain neurophysiology. Secondary purposes were to explore demographic variation in knowledge, describe practice-related beliefs about pain science, and explore associations between knowledge and beliefs.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional descriptive survey study.

METHODS

An electronic survey, including the Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (R-NPQ) and Likert-type questions about practice-related beliefs, was distributed to American Society of Hand Therapists members.

RESULTS

Data from 305 survey responses were analyzed. R-NPQ accuracy ranged from 42% to 100%, with a mean of 75% (9/12 ± 1.5). Certified hand therapists scored, on average, 0.8 points lower than their noncertified peers. Participants with a doctoral degree scored 0.7 or 0.6 points higher, respectively, than those with a bachelor's or master's degree. Objective knowledge of pain neurophysiology was positively associated with perceived knowledge of pain science (ρ = .31, P < .001). Associations between R-NPQ and perceived importance of knowing pain science; confidence in pain-related evaluation, treatment, and education; and frequency of incorporating pain science principles into practice were small but statistically significant (ρ = .12-.25, P = <.001-.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Although hand therapists recognized the importance of knowing pain science, they had objective and subjective limitations in that knowledge. Specific errors in their R-NPQ responses suggest misconceptions related to the modern differentiation between nociception and pain. Blurring of these constructs may relate to participants' self-reported practice emphasis on acute versus chronic conditions. Future studies should explore knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about pain beyond R-NPQ scores to understand variation in practice and training needs.

Applicability of pain neuroscience education: Where are we now?

BACKGROUND

Explaining pain to patients through pain neuroscience education (PNE) is currently a widespread treatment studied in the musculoskeletal context. Presently, there is sufficient evidence supporting the effectiveness of PNE in patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. However, clinicians must pay attention to the actual possibility to transfer research findings in their specific clinical context.

OBJECTIVE

We analysed the applicability of results of studies focused on PNE, which has not been done previously.

METHODS

A detailed discussion on PNE applicability is provided, starting from published randomized controlled trials that investigated the effectiveness of PNE.

RESULTS

This paper markedly points out the awareness of clinicians on the need for an accurate contextualization when choosing PNE as an intervention in clinical practice.

The immediate effect of a single session of pain neuroscience education on pain and the autonomic nervous system in subjects with persistent pain, a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The autonomic nervous system is a system that operates at the subconscious level and has been associated with neurobehavioral aspects of pain. Overall, persistent pain has a stimulating effect on the sympathetic nervous system. A promising emerging nonpharmacological treatment to manage persistent pain is neuroscience-based pain education. The overarching goal of neuroscience-based pain education is to change cognitions about pain and the pain experience through education. The aim was to determine the immediate and short-term impact of a neuroscience-based pain education video on the autonomic nervous system and pain in a subgroup of individuals with persistent pain.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 26 subjects were recruited for this study. Each subject indicated their pain level at the time of testing using a Visual Analogue Scale. Automated pupillometry was utilized to measure pupil diameter. After two minutes of accommodation to the goggles, the pupil was measured continuously for 60 s. Following this a 5-minute video presentation "Understanding Pain" was watched, followed by a continuous pupil measurement for 60 s. Three minutes after this measure, the final pupil diameter measurement was taken for 60 s. After completing the final pupil measure, the subject was asked to fill out a second Visual Analogue Scale and a Global Rate of Change.

OUTCOMES

Each subject completed a Global Rating of Change Scale and the mean score was 1.14 (SD = 1.61 and a SEM = 0.), supporting the hypothesis of an overall self-perceived benefit from the intervention. There was a statistically significant difference in pain following the video, P < 0.01. A significant correlation was observed between the self-perceived decrease in pain level and the Global Rating of Change score, p = 0.02. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean pupil diameter following the video with p = 0.76 for the right eye and p = 0.250 for the left eye.

DISCUSSION

This pilot study demonstrated that a 5-minute neuroscience-based pain education video reduced perceived pain in a small sample of subjects with persistent pain. Watching the neuroscience-based pain education video did not seem to result in an immediate generalized autonomic nervous system response. However, it resulted in a different reaction on each eye. This unequal response might be the result of the hemispheric lateralization of the ANS. This study supports the fact that the pain experience is determined by the balance between conscious cognitive processes and subconscious processes based on previous psychological experiences.

Preoperative pain neuroscience education for shoulder surgery: A case series

Background

Central sensitisation, in addition to high levels of fear-avoidance and pain catastrophisation may exist in a subgroup of patients with shoulder pain. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) has been shown to positively influence sensitivity of the nervous system, as well as reduce fear and catastrophisation prior to lumbar and total knee surgery. To date, no study has examined the application of PNE prior to shoulder surgery.

Objectives

This study examined the response to preoperative PNE in patients preparing for shoulder surgery.

Method

An exploratory pre–post case series was conducted. Twelve patients scheduled for surgery completed various pre-education measurements including shoulder pain, fear-avoidance, pain catastrophisation, beliefs and expectations regarding surgery, active shoulder flexion and pressure pain thresholds for the involved and uninvolved shoulder and the dominant-sided knee. Patients underwent a standard 30-min, one-on-one PNE session with a physiotherapist prior to surgery.

Results

Following education, all measures improved with some failing to reach significance: self-reported pain (p = 0.125), pain catastrophisation (p = 0.250) and pain pressure threshold of the uninvolved shoulder (p = 0.68) and knee (p = 0.097). Fear-avoidance (p = 0.013), active shoulder flexion (p = 0.013) and pain pressure threshold for the involved shoulder (p = 0.004) significantly improved.

Conclusion

A small patient group improved beyond minimal detectable change and/or minimal clinical important difference after education. No significant shifts of the preoperative beliefs occurred after education.

Clinical implications

Preoperative PNE may be beneficial to a subgroup of patients scheduled for shoulder surgery.

Embedding pain neuroscience education in the physical therapy management of patients with chronic plantar fasciitis: a prospective case series

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this case series was to describe the effects of a biopsychosocial approach that embeds pain neuroscience education (PNE) within physical therapy for improving foot and ankle function, pain, and psychosocial factors in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis.

METHODS

Seven female patients (mean [SD] age = 49.0 [11.4] years) receiving physical therapy for chronic plantar fasciitis were enrolled. Along with formal physical therapy, patients received six 15-minute PNE sessions. Knowledge of pain neuroscience was assessed before and after PNE with the Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire. Patients completed questionnaires for foot and ankle function (Activities of Daily Living subscale of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure), pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale), pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), and fear of movement (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia) at baseline (before treatment) and 6 and 12 weeks. Local and remote pain sensitivity was assessed using a pressure algometer at baseline and 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Patients attended a mean (range) of 8.7 (7 to 12) physical therapy sessions over a mean (range) of 46.7 (42 to 56) days. After PNE, six (86%) patients demonstrated increased knowledge of pain neuroscience. At 12 weeks, six (86%) patients met or exceeded minimally clinically important difference (MCID) for foot and ankle function and pain. Five (71%) patients met or exceeded MCID for pain catastrophizing and fear of movement. Local pain sensitivity was reduced in six (86%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Physical therapy integrating PNE is potentially beneficial for patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. Future studies should examine the efficacy of PNE in randomized trials with larger representative samples.