1
|
Craven BC, Bateman EA, Flett H, Farahani F, Wolfe DL, Askari S, Omidvar M, Alavinia M. The Changing Prevalence of Pressure Injury among Ontarians with SCI/D at Rehabilitation Admission: Opportunities for Improvement. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:1084. [PMID: 38891159 PMCID: PMC11171508 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12111084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite preventability, 20-50% of patients with acute spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) develop hospital-acquired pressure injuries (PIs). The Spinal Cord Injury Implementation and Evaluation Quality Care Consortium (SCI IEQCC) aimed to mitigate PI risk through patient-reported daily skin checks alongside usual care. METHODS This quality improvement initiative utilized an interrupted time series design, encompassing adults ≥ 18 years admitted for inpatient rehabilitation across five Ontario sites from 2020 to 2023. Patient demographics, etiology, and impairment data were obtained from a national registry, while participating sites gathered data on PI onset, location, and severity. Run charts depicted temporal trends, and statistical analyses, including chi-square and logistic regression, compared patients with and without PIs. RESULTS Data from 1767 discharged SCI/D patients revealed that 26% had ≥1 PI, with 59% being prevalent and 41% incident. Most severe PIs (stages III and IV and unstageable) were acquired prior to admission. Process indicator fidelity was reasonable at 68%. Patients with PIs experienced longer hospital stays, lower Functional Independence Measure (FIM) changes, and FIM efficiency during rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS PI prevalence is increasing, particularly sacral injuries at admission, while incident cases have decreased since 2021 due to regular skin checks. This trend calls for proactive health system interventions to reduce costs and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beverley Catharine Craven
- Lyndhurst Centre, The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M4G 3V9, Canada; (B.C.C.); (H.F.); (F.F.); (M.O.)
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Emma A. Bateman
- Parkwood Institute Research, St Joseph’s Health Care London, London, ON N6A 4V2, Canada; (E.A.B.); (D.L.W.)
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
| | - Heather Flett
- Lyndhurst Centre, The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M4G 3V9, Canada; (B.C.C.); (H.F.); (F.F.); (M.O.)
| | - Farnoosh Farahani
- Lyndhurst Centre, The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M4G 3V9, Canada; (B.C.C.); (H.F.); (F.F.); (M.O.)
| | - Dalton L. Wolfe
- Parkwood Institute Research, St Joseph’s Health Care London, London, ON N6A 4V2, Canada; (E.A.B.); (D.L.W.)
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Health Studies, Western University, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
| | - Sussan Askari
- Faculty of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Providence Care Hospital, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 4X3, Canada;
| | - Maryam Omidvar
- Lyndhurst Centre, The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M4G 3V9, Canada; (B.C.C.); (H.F.); (F.F.); (M.O.)
| | - Mohammad Alavinia
- Lyndhurst Centre, The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M4G 3V9, Canada; (B.C.C.); (H.F.); (F.F.); (M.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kovacs Burns K, Bhatia Z, Gill B, van der Nest D, Knox J, Mouneimne M, Buck T, Charbonneau R, Aiello K, Loyola Sanchez A, Kamran R, Olayinka O, Ho C. Measures for Persons with Spinal Cord Injury to Monitor Their Transitions in Care, Health, Function, and Quality of Life Experiences and Needs: A Protocol for Co-Developing a Self-Evaluation Tool. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:527. [PMID: 38470643 PMCID: PMC10930772 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12050527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Evaluating the experiences of persons with spinal cord injury (PwSCI) regarding their transitions in care and changes in health, function, and quality of life is complex, fragmented, and involves multiple tools and measures. A staged protocol was implemented with PwSCI and relevant expert stakeholders initially exploring and selecting existing measures or tools through a modified Delphi process, followed by choosing one of two options. The options were to either support the use of the 10 selected tools from the Delphi method or to co-develop one unique condensed tool with relevant measures to evaluate all four domains. The stakeholders chose to co-develop one tool to be used by persons with SCI to monitor their transition experiences across settings and care providers. This includes any issues with care or support they needed to address at the time of discharge from acute care or rehabilitation and in the community at 3, 6, and 12 months or longer post-discharge. Once developed, the tool was made available online for the final stage of the protocol, which proposes that the tool be reliability tested prior to its launch, followed by validation testing by PwSCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Kovacs Burns
- Clinical Quality Metrics/Primary Data Support, Data & Analytics, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB T5J 3E4, Canada
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Zahra Bhatia
- Spinal Cord Injury Alberta, Calgary, AB T2H 1H7, Canada
| | - Benveet Gill
- ReYu Paralysis Recovery Centre, Edmonton, AB T5S 1G8, Canada
| | - Dalique van der Nest
- Slave Lake Healthcare Centre (North Zone), Alberta Health Services, Slave Lake, AB T0G 2A2, Canada
| | - Jason Knox
- Tertiary Neurorehabilitation, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Magda Mouneimne
- Tertiary Neurorehabilitation, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Taryn Buck
- Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Edmonton, AB T5G 0B7, Canada
| | - Rebecca Charbonneau
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Kasey Aiello
- Patient Liaison to Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Adalberto Loyola Sanchez
- Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Edmonton, AB T5G 0B7, Canada
| | - Rija Kamran
- Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Olaleye Olayinka
- Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada
| | - Chester Ho
- Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Edmonton, AB T5G 0B7, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alavinia M, Farahani F, Musselman K, Plourde K, Omidvar M, Verrier MC, Aliabadi S, Craven BC. Convergent validity and responsiveness of The Standing and Walking Assessment Tool (SWAT) among individuals with non-traumatic spinal cord injury. Front Neurol 2024; 14:1280225. [PMID: 38322795 PMCID: PMC10844483 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1280225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim This study aimed to (1) describe the use of the Standing and Walking Assessment Tool (SWAT) among individuals with non-traumatic spinal cord injury or disease (NT-SCI/D); (2) evaluate the convergent validity of SWAT for use among inpatients with NT-SCI/D; (3) describe SWAT responsiveness; and (4) explore the relationship between hours of walking therapy and SWAT change. Methods A quality improvement project was conducted at the University Health Network between 2019 and 2022. Participants' demographics and impairments data, rehabilitation length of stay, and FIM scores were obtained from the National Rehabilitation Reporting System. The walking measure data were collected by therapists as part of routine practice. Hours of part- or whole-gait practice were abstracted from medical records. To determine convergent validity, Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated between SWAT stages (admission and discharge) and the walking measures. The change in SWAT levels was calculated to determine responsiveness. Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated between SWAT change and hours of walking therapy. Results Among adult NT-SCI/D participants with potential walking capacity (SWAT≥1B), the majority were classified as American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale D (AIS D) at admission. The SWAT category of 1C (N = 100, 18%) was the most frequent at admission. The most frequent SWAT stage at discharge was 3C among participants with NT-SCI/D, with positive conversions in SWAT stages from admission to discharge (N = 276, 33%). The mean change in SWAT score was 3 for participants with T-SCI and NT-SCI/D. Moderate correlations between SWAT stages and walking measures were observed. The correlation of hours of gait therapy with the SWAT change (admission to discharge) was 0.44 (p < 0001). Conclusion The SWAT has sufficient convergent validity and responsiveness for describing standing and walking recovery and communicating/monitoring rehabilitation progress among patients with NT-SCI/D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Alavinia
- The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Farnoosh Farahani
- The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kristin Musselman
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kristina Plourde
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maryam Omidvar
- The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Molly C. Verrier
- The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Saina Aliabadi
- The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- School of Graduate Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Craven BC, Popovic MR, Musselman KE, Black C, Dow H. Reframing the Science and Practice of Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: Two Decades of Reflection. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2023; 29:iv-xi. [PMID: 38174127 PMCID: PMC10759888 DOI: 10.46292/1945-5763-29.suppl.iv] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
|
5
|
Ghodsi Z, Jazayeri SB, Pourrashidi A, Sadeghi-Naeini M, Azadmanjir Z, Baigi V, Maroufi SF, Azarhomayoun A, Faghih-Jouybari M, Amirjamshidi A, Naghdi K, Habibi Arejan R, Shabani M, Sepahdoost A, Dehghanbanadaki H, Habibi R, Mohammadzadeh M, Bahreini M, O'Reilly GM, Vaccaro AR, Harrop JS, Davies BM, Yi L, Ghodsi SM, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Development of a comprehensive assessment tool to measure the quality of care for individuals with traumatic spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 2023; 9:12. [PMID: 37005413 PMCID: PMC10067818 DOI: 10.1038/s41394-023-00569-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a comprehensive assessment tool to evaluate the Quality of Care (QoC) in managing individuals with traumatic spinal cord injuries (TSCI). METHOD At first, the concepts of QoC for TSCI were identified by conducting a qualitative interview along with re-evaluation of the results of a published scoping review (conceptualization). After operationalization of indicators, they were valued by using the expert panel method. Afterward, the content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR) were calculated and served as cut-offs for indicator selection. Then specific questions were developed for each indicator and classified into three categories: pre-hospital, in-hospital, and post-hospital. Data availability of the National Spinal Cord Injury Registry of Iran (NSCIR-IR) was subsequently used to design questions that represent indicators in an assessment tool format. The comprehensiveness of the tool was evaluated using a 4-item Likert scale by the expert panel. RESULT Twelve experts participated in conceptualization and 11 experts participated in operationalization phase. Overall, 94 concepts for QoC were identified from published scoping review (87 items) and qualitative interviews (7 items). The process of operationalization and indicator selection led to the development of 27 indicators with acceptable content validity. Finally, the assessment tool contained three pre-hospital, twelve in-hospital, nine post-hospital, and three mixed indicators. Ninety-one percent of experts evaluated the entire tool as comprehensive. CONCLUSION Our study presents a health-related QoC tool that contains a comprehensive set of indicators to assess the QoC for individuals with TSCI. However, this tool should be used in various situations to establish construct validity further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Ghodsi
- Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Behnam Jazayeri
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ahmad Pourrashidi
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohsen Sadeghi-Naeini
- Department of Neurosurgery, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zahra Azadmanjir
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Health Information Management Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Vali Baigi
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Farzad Maroufi
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amir Azarhomayoun
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Morteza Faghih-Jouybari
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abbas Amirjamshidi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Khatereh Naghdi
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Maryam Shabani
- Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Hojat Dehghanbanadaki
- Metabolic Disorders Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular-Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Habibi
- Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Maryam Bahreini
- Emergency Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Gerard Michael O'Reilly
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- National Trauma Research Institute, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alexander R Vaccaro
- Department of Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and the Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James S Harrop
- Department of Neurological and Orthopedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Benjamin M Davies
- Department of Academic Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lu Yi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Seyed Mohammad Ghodsi
- Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
- Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran.
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
- Visiting Professor, Spine Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rivera JMB, Yousefi C, Cheng CL, Norman CD, Legare J, McFarlane A, Noonan VK. Optimizing spinal cord injury care in Canada: Development of a framework for strategy and action. Front Public Health 2022; 10:921926. [PMID: 36420007 PMCID: PMC9678047 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.921926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
National health strategies are integral in defining the vision and strategic direction for ensuring the health of a population or for a specific health area. To facilitate a national coordinated approach in spinal cord injury (SCI) research and care in Canada, Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, with support from national experts and funding from the Government of Canada, developed a national strategy to advance SCI care, health, and wellness based on previous SCI strategic documents. This paper describes the development process of the SCI Care for Canada: A Framework for Strategy and Action. Specifically, it covers the process of building on historical and existing work of SCI in Canada through a thorough review of literature to inform community consultations and co-creation design. Furthermore, this paper describes planning for communication, dissemination, and evaluation. The SCI Care Strategic Framework promotes an updated common understanding of the goals and vision of the SCI community, as well as strengths and priorities within the SCI system regarding care, health, and wellness. Additionally, it supports the coordination and scaling up of SCI advancements to make a sustainable impact nationwide focusing on the needs of people living with SCI.
Collapse
|
7
|
Upganlawar D, Harjpal P, Samal SS, Patel L. Comprehensive Rehabilitation of Post-Operative Paraplegic Patient: A Case Report. Cureus 2022; 14:e30446. [DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
8
|
Krysa JA, Gregorio MP, Pohar Manhas K, MacIsaac R, Papathanassoglou E, Ho CH. Empowerment, Communication, and Navigating Care: The Experience of Persons With Spinal Cord Injury From Acute Hospitalization to Inpatient Rehabilitation. FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES 2022; 3:904716. [PMID: 36188987 PMCID: PMC9397833 DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.904716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Spinal cord injury (SCI) results in long-term functional impairments that significantly impact participation and role in the community. Newly injured persons are often reintroduced to the community with significant deficits in knowledge, including how to access and navigate community resources and supports. This warrants a better understanding of the patient experience of in-hospital care and discharge planning to ensure individuals with SCI are best supported during transitions in care and while living in the community. Objective To explore the lived experience of persons with acute SCI and their perceptions of care, focusing on the initial hospital experiences to inpatient rehabilitation. Methods A phenomenological research study was conducted using semi-structured interviews. Eligible participants had differing etiologies of SCI (including non-traumatic and traumatic SCI), were over the age of 18 at the time of initial care, and experienced acute hospital and inpatient rehabilitation at an Alberta-based institution within the last 10 years. One-on-one interviews took place between March and June 2021 over telephone or virtual platforms (Zoom). Interview transcripts, and field notes developed the text, which underwent hermeneutic analysis to develop central themes. Results The present study included 10 participants living with an SCI in Alberta, Canada. Most participants (80%) were male. Participants' age ranged from 24 to 69 years. The median years since initial SCI was 3 years. Interviews lasted 45–75 min. Seven participants identified as having a traumatic SCI injury and three identified as having a non-traumatic SCI. The interplay between empowerment and disempowerment emerged as the core theme, permeating participants' meanings and perceptions. Three main themes emerged from the interviews regarding the perceptions of the SCI patient experience. Each theme represents a perception central to their inpatient experience: desire to enhance functional independence to empower confidence and self-management; need for effective communication with healthcare providers to support recovery; and navigating appropriate care supports to enhance preparedness for discharge and returning home. Conclusion This study demonstrates the significant need to enhance education of person/family-centered SCI care, foster positive communication between care recipients and care providers, and facilitate better in-hospital access to appropriate navigation and wayfinding supports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline A. Krysa
- Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, and Vision Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Marianne Pearl Gregorio
- Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, and Vision Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Kiran Pohar Manhas
- Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, and Vision Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Rob MacIsaac
- Spinal Cord Injury Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Papathanassoglou
- Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, and Vision Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Chester H. Ho
- Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, and Vision Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- *Correspondence: Chester H. Ho
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Khosravi S, Khayyamfar A, Shemshadi M, Koltapeh MP, Sadeghi-Naini M, Ghodsi Z, Shokraneh F, Bardsiri MS, Derakhshan P, Komlakh K, Vaccaro AR, Fehlings MG, Guest JD, Noonan V, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Indicators of Quality of Care in Individuals With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Scoping Review. Global Spine J 2022; 12:166-181. [PMID: 33487062 PMCID: PMC8965305 DOI: 10.1177/2192568220981988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Scoping review. OBJECTIVES To identify a practical and reproducible approach to organize Quality of Care Indicators (QoCI) in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI). METHODS A comprehensive literature review was conducted in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Date: May 2018), MEDLINE (1946 to May 2018), and EMBASE (1974 to May 2018). Two independent reviewers screened 6092 records and included 262 full texts, among which 60 studies were included for qualitative analysis. We included studies, with no language restriction, containing at least 1 quality of care indicator for individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury. Each potential indicator was evaluated in an online, focused group discussion to define its categorization (healthcare system structure, medical process, and individuals with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury related outcomes), definition, survey options, and scale. RESULTS A total of 87 indicators were identified from 60 studies screened using our eligibility criteria. We defined each indicator. Out of 87 indicators, 37 appraised the healthcare system structure, 30 evaluated medical processes, and 20 included individuals with TSCI related outcomes. The healthcare system structure included the impact of the cost of hospitalization and rehabilitation, as well as staff and patient perception of treatment. The medical processes included targeting physical activities for improvement of health-related outcomes and complications. Changes in motor score, functional independence, and readmission rates were reported as individuals with TSCI-related outcomes indicators. CONCLUSION Indicators of quality of care in the management of individuals with TSCI are important for health policy strategists to standardize healthcare assessment, for clinicians to improve care, and for data collection efforts including registries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sepehr Khosravi
- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran,Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amirmahdi Khayyamfar
- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran,Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Milad Shemshadi
- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran,Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Masoud Pourghahramani Koltapeh
- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran,Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohsen Sadeghi-Naini
- Neurosurgery Department, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zahra Ghodsi
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farhad Shokraneh
- King’s Technology Evaluation Centre, London Institute of Healthcare Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK,The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Pegah Derakhshan
- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran,Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Khalil Komlakh
- Neurosurgery Department, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Alex R. Vaccaro
- The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto and Division of Neurosurgery, Krembil Neuroscience Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James D. Guest
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Vanessa Noonan
- Rick Hansen Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran,Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran,Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Catharine Craven B, Musselman K, Humphreys S, Walden K, Parsons J, Eapen J, Noonan VK, Cheng CL, Yousefi C, Chernesky J, Côté-Boileau É, Ibrahim N, Kalay AL, Kingston D, Clément L, Bayley M, Kua A, Patsakos E, Cheng C, Eng J, Ho C, Queree M, Farahani F, Flett H, Scovil C, Evbuomwan I, Athanasopoulos P, Wolf D, Ebsary S, McBride C, Adair B, Beaton N, Bury M, Cooper D, Dyer S, Howe S, Scott L, Stanley A. Transforming SCI rehabilitation care through innovation. J Spinal Cord Med 2021; 44:S5-S16. [PMID: 34779734 PMCID: PMC8604518 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1965449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- B. Catharine Craven
- Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association,Correspondence to: B. Catharine Craven, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M4G 3V9, Canada.
| | | | - Suzanne Humphreys
- PRAXIS Spinal Cord Institute for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Kristen Walden
- PRAXIS Spinal Cord Institute for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Jessica Parsons
- PRAXIS Spinal Cord Institute for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Jessica Eapen
- PRAXIS Spinal Cord Institute for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Vanessa K Noonan
- PRAXIS Spinal Cord Institute for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Christiana L Cheng
- PRAXIS Spinal Cord Institute for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Charlene Yousefi
- PRAXIS Spinal Cord Institute and the Health Standards Organization for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - John Chernesky
- PRAXIS Spinal Cord Institute and the Health Standards Organization for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Élizabeth Côté-Boileau
- PRAXIS Spinal Cord Institute and the Health Standards Organization for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Nadine Ibrahim
- PRAXIS Spinal Cord Institute and the Health Standards Organization for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Anifa Luyinga Kalay
- PRAXIS Spinal Cord Institute and the Health Standards Organization for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Darryl Kingston
- PRAXIS Spinal Cord Institute and the Health Standards Organization for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Louise Clément
- PRAXIS Spinal Cord Institute and the Health Standards Organization for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - M. Bayley
- University Health Network Can-SCIP, Steering Committee for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - A. Kua
- University Health Network Can-SCIP, Steering Committee for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - E. Patsakos
- University Health Network Can-SCIP, Steering Committee for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - C. Cheng
- University Health Network Can-SCIP, Steering Committee for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - J. Eng
- University Health Network Can-SCIP, Steering Committee for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - C. Ho
- University Health Network Can-SCIP, Steering Committee for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - M. Queree
- University Health Network Can-SCIP, Steering Committee for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Farnoosh Farahani
- Spinal Cord Injury Implementation and Evaluation Quality Care Consortium for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Heather Flett
- Spinal Cord Injury Implementation and Evaluation Quality Care Consortium for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Carol Scovil
- Spinal Cord Injury Implementation and Evaluation Quality Care Consortium for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Ivie Evbuomwan
- Spinal Cord Injury Implementation and Evaluation Quality Care Consortium for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Peter Athanasopoulos
- Spinal Cord Injury Implementation and Evaluation Quality Care Consortium for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Dalton Wolf
- Spinal Cord Injury Implementation and Evaluation Quality Care Consortium for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Sophie Ebsary
- Canadian Activity-Based Therapy Community of Practice for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Christopher McBride
- Spinal Cord Injury Canada for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Bill Adair
- Spinal Cord Injury Canada for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Nancy Beaton
- Spinal Cord Injury Canada for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Michael Bury
- Spinal Cord Injury Canada for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Darlene Cooper
- Spinal Cord Injury Canada for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Shaun Dyer
- Spinal Cord Injury Canada for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Stuart Howe
- Spinal Cord Injury Canada for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Launel Scott
- Spinal Cord Injury Canada for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| | - Alan Stanley
- Spinal Cord Injury Canada for Canadian Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation Association
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jeyathevan G, Jaglal SB, Hitzig SL, Linassi G, Mills S, Noonan VK, Anzai K, Clarke T, Wolfe D, Bayley M, Aslam L, Farahani F, Alavinia SM, Omidvar M, Craven BC. Conception and development of Self-Management indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project. J Spinal Cord Med 2021; 44:S94-S117. [PMID: 34779736 PMCID: PMC8604486 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1961054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Although self-management is linked to reduced secondary health complications (SHCs) and enhanced overall quality of life post-spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D), it is poorly integrated into the current rehabilitation process. Promoting self-management and assuring equity in care delivery is critical. Herein, we describe the selection of Self-Management structure, process and outcome indicators for adults with SCI/D in the first 18 months after rehabilitation admission. METHODS Experts in self-management across Canada completed the following tasks: (1) defined the Self-Management construct; (2) conducted a systematic search of available outcomes and their psychometric properties; and (3) created a Driver diagram summarizing available evidence related to Self-Management. Facilitated meetings allowed development and selection following rapid-cycle evaluations of proposed structure, process and outcome indicators. RESULTS The structure indicator is the proportion of staff with appropriate education and training in self-management principles. The process indicator is the proportion of SCI/D inpatients who have received a self-management assessment related to specific patient self-management goal(s) within 30 days of admission. The outcome indicator is the Skill and Technique Acquisition, and Self-Monitoring and Insight subscores of the modified Health Education Impact Questionnaire. CONCLUSION The structure indicator will heighten awareness among administrators and policy makers regarding the need to provide staff with ongoing training related to promoting self-management skill acquisition. Successful implementation of the Self-Management process and outcome indicators will promote self-management education and skill acquisition as a rehabilitation priority, allow for personalization of skills related to the individual's self-management goal(s), and empower individuals with SCI/D to manage their health and daily activities while successfully integrating into the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaya Jeyathevan
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan B. Jaglal
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sander L. Hitzig
- St. John’s Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gary Linassi
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Sandra Mills
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Karen Anzai
- GF Strong Rehab Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Dalton Wolfe
- Parkwood Institute Research, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada,School of Health Studies, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Bayley
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lubna Aslam
- Spinal Cord Injury Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Farnoosh Farahani
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - S. Mohammad Alavinia
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maryam Omidvar
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Correspondence to: B. Catharine Craven, KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, 206-H 520 Sutherland Drive, Toronto, ON, M4G3V9, Canada; Ph: 416-597-3422x6122.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alavinia SM, Jetha A, Hitzig SL, McCauley D, Routhier F, Noonan VK, Linassi G, Farahani F, Omidvar M, Jeyathevan G, Craven BC. Development of employment indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation care: SCI-High Project. J Spinal Cord Med 2021; 44:S118-S133. [PMID: 34779730 PMCID: PMC8604534 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1955205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Employment and Return to Work (RTW) rates following spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) are low due to individual and impairments characteristics, secondary health conditions, social and environmental barriers, prior work experience, workplace supports and resources, and physical or psychosocial work demands. To improve RTW, the SCI-High Project team developed a set of Employment structure, process, and outcome indicators for adults with SCI/D in the first 18 months after rehabilitation admission. METHODS A pan-Canadian Working Group of diverse stakeholders: (1) defined the Employment construct; (2) conducted a systematic search of available outcomes measures; (3) constructed a Driver diagram summarizing factors associated with employment. Subsequent facilitated meetings allowed for the creation of structure and process indicators, and the selection of outcome indicators. RESULTS The structure indicator is the proportion of SCI/D rehabilitation programs with an employment resource center. The process indicator is the proportion of SCI/D rehabilitation inpatients who receive an employment assessment during inpatient rehabilitation. The intermediary and final outcome measures are the Readiness for Return-to-Work Scale (RRTW) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI). Scale A of the RRTW for those who are unemployed and Scale B of RRTW and WPAI will be used for those who are employed. CONCLUSION This framework of Employment indicators intends to support the RTW needs of persons with SCI/D by ensuring that rehabilitation professionals provide opportunities to explore RTW within the first 18 months after rehab admission. Increased employment rates have the potential to enhance the wellbeing, health, and longevity of individuals with SCI/D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed Mohammad Alavinia
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arif Jetha
- Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sander L. Hitzig
- St. John’s Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - François Routhier
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada,Centre for interdisciplinary research in rehabilitation and social integration, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Gary Linassi
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Farnoosh Farahani
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maryam Omidvar
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gaya Jeyathevan
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Correspondence to: B. Catharine Craven, KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 206-H 520 Sutherland Drive, Toronto, ONM4G3V9, Canada; Ph: 416-597-3422x6122.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Musselman KE, Walden K, Noonan VK, Jervis-Rademeyer H, Thorogood N, Bouyer L, Chan B, Donkers S, Ho C, Jeji T, Kaiser A, Klassen TD, Zariffa J, Grant C, Masani K, Zbogar D, Athanasopoulous P. Development of priorities for a Canadian strategy to advance activity-based therapies after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2021; 59:874-884. [PMID: 34099881 PMCID: PMC8338546 DOI: 10.1038/s41393-021-00644-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Study Design Participatory design. Objectives Activity-based therapies (ABT) have physical and psychosocial benefits for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). A Canadian ABT summit was held to: (1) identify methods used in stroke rehabilitation that may be appropriate for SCI; (2) understand the current state of ABT activities in Canada; and (3) identify priorities for ABT research and care for the next five years. Setting Stakeholder-engaged meeting at a tertiary rehabilitation hospital. Methods Thirty-nine stakeholders, including individuals with SCI, frontline clinicians, healthcare administrators, researchers, funders and health policy experts, attended. Two participants were note-takers. Priority identification occurred through input from stakeholder groups, followed by individual voting. Conventional content analysis was used to synthesize the information in the meeting notes. Results The strengths of ABT in stroke rehabilitation included clear and clinically feasible definitions, measurements and interventions, and recognized requirements for implementation (e.g. behavior change, partnerships). Knowledge gaps concerning ABT activities in Canada were identified for acute and community settings, non-traumatic populations, and the interventions, equipment and standardized measures (i.e. upper limb, activity levels) used. Five priorities for ABT across the continuum of care were identified: (1) Identify current ABT activities; (2) Create a network to facilitate dialog; (3) Track engagement in ABT activities; (4) Develop and implement best practice recommendations; and (5) Study optimal timing, methods, and dose of ABT. Working groups were formed to address priorities 1–3. Conclusions The priorities will guide SCI research and care activities in Canada over the next five years. Sponsorship Praxis Spinal Cord Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin E Musselman
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | | | | | - Hope Jervis-Rademeyer
- KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Laurent Bouyer
- Department of Rehabilitation, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.,Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Brian Chan
- KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah Donkers
- School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Chester Ho
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.,Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Tara Jeji
- Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anita Kaiser
- KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Canadian Spinal Research Organization, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tara D Klassen
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - José Zariffa
- KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Christopher Grant
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Kei Masani
- KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dominik Zbogar
- Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Peter Athanasopoulous
- Spinal Cord Injury Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.,SCI Solutions Alliance, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hitzig SL, Jeyathevan G, Farahani F, Noonan VK, Linassi G, Routhier F, Jetha A, McCauley D, Alavinia SM, Omidvar M, Craven BC. Development of community participation indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project. J Spinal Cord Med 2021; 44:S79-S93. [PMID: 34779731 PMCID: PMC8604477 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1955204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Community participation following spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) can be challenging due to associated primary impairments and secondary health conditions as well as difficulties navigating both the built and social-emotional environment. To improve the quality of SCI/D rehabilitation care to optimize community participation, the SCI-High Project developed a set of structure, process and outcome indicators for adults with SCI/D in the first 18 months after rehabilitation admission. A pan-Canadian Working Group of diverse stakeholders: (1) defined the community participation construct; (2) conducted a systematic review of available outcomes and their psychometric properties; (3) constructed a Driver diagram summarizing available evidence associated with community participation; and (4) prepared a process map. Facilitated meetings allowed selection and review of a set of structure, process and outcome indicators. The structure indicator is the proportion of SCI/D rehabilitation programs with availability of transition living setting/independent living unit. The process indicators are the proportion of SCI/D rehabilitation inpatients who experienced: (a) a therapeutic community outing prior to rehabilitation discharge; and, (b) those who received a pass to go home for the weekend. The intermediary and final outcome measures are the Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale and the Reintegration to Normal Living Index. The proposed indicators have the potential to inform whether inpatient rehabilitation for persons with SCI/D can improve self-efficacy and lead to high levels of community participation post-rehabilitation discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander L. Hitzig
- St. John’s Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gaya Jeyathevan
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Farnoosh Farahani
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Gary Linassi
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - François Routhier
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Québec, Canada
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Arif Jetha
- Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - S. Mohammad Alavinia
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maryam Omidvar
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Patsakos EM, Bayley MT, Kua A, Cheng C, Eng J, Ho C, Noonan VK, Querée M, Craven BC. Development of the Canadian Spinal Cord Injury Best Practice (Can-SCIP) Guideline: Methods and overview. J Spinal Cord Med 2021; 44:S52-S68. [PMID: 34779719 PMCID: PMC8604491 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1953312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a life-altering injury that leads to a complex constellation of changes in an individual's sensory, motor, and autonomic function which is largely determined by the level and severity of cord impairment. Available SCI-specific clinical practice guidelines (CPG) address specific impairments, health conditions or a segment of the care continuum, however, fail to address all the important clinical questions arising throughout an individual's care journey. To address this gap, an interprofessional panel of experts in SCI convened to develop the Canadian Spinal Cord Injury Best Practice (Can-SCIP) Guideline. This article provides an overview of the methods underpinning the Can-SCIP Guideline process. METHODS The Can-SCIP Guideline was developed using the Guidelines Adaptation Cycle. A comprehensive search for existing SCI-specific CPGs was conducted. The quality of eligible CPGs was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. An expert panel (n = 52) convened, and groups of relevant experts met to review and recommend adoption or refinement of existing recommendations or develop new recommendations based on evidence from systematic reviews conducted by the Spinal Cord Injury Research Evidence (SCIRE) team. The expert panel voted to approve selected recommendations using an online survey tool. RESULTS The Can-SCIP Guideline includes 585 total recommendations from 41 guidelines, 96 recommendations that pertain to the Components of the Ideal SCI Care System section, and 489 recommendations that pertain to the Management of Secondary Health Conditions section. Most recommendations (n = 281, 48%) were adopted from existing guidelines without revision, 215 (36.8%) recommendations were revised for application in a Canadian context, and 89 recommendations (15.2%) were created de novo. CONCLUSION The Can-SCIP Guideline is the first living comprehensive guideline for adults with SCI in Canada across the care continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni M. Patsakos
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark T. Bayley
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ailene Kua
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christiana Cheng
- Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Janice Eng
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Physiotherapy, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Chester Ho
- Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vanessa K. Noonan
- Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Matthew Querée
- GF Strong Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bateman EA, Sreenivasan VA, Farahani F, Casemore S, Chase AD, Duley J, Evbuomwan IK, Flett HM, Ventre A, Craven BC, Wolfe DL. Improving practice through collaboration: Early experiences from the multi-site Spinal Cord Injury Implementation and Evaluation Quality Care Consortium. J Spinal Cord Med 2021; 44:S147-S158. [PMID: 34779729 PMCID: PMC8604479 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1936946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Dedicated implementation efforts are critical to bridging the gaps between current practices and best practices. A quality improvement collaborative (QIC), the Spinal Cord Injury Implementation and Evaluation Quality Care Consortium (SCI IEQCC), was established to meet this need, bringing together a network of clinicians and administrators to systematically improve the quality and equity of tertiary spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) rehabilitation care in Ontario, Canada. METHODS Clinicians and leaders from five tertiary SCI/D rehabilitation centers and two not-for-profit SCI/D advocacy groups comprised a network dedicated to supporting implementation of the SCI-High quality indicators in prioritized domains of SCI rehabilitation and related best practices by: (1) building capacity through implementation science education of frontline clinicians; (2) providing resources and support to empower frontline clinicians to lead quality improvement efforts within their institutions; (3) promoting wider learning through a network for sharing ideas, efforts, and experiences; and (4) collecting indicator data to facilitate provincial evaluation of goal attainment. RESULTS Network members and sites collaborated to implement best practices within six priority domains; in 18 months, significant progress has been made in emotional wellbeing, sexual health, walking, and wheeled mobility despite disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These efforts encompass heterogeneous challenges and strategies, ranging from developing clinical skills programs, to streamlining processes, to manipulating physical space. CONCLUSION A QIC targeting SCI/D rehabilitation demonstrates promise for advancing the implementation of best practices, building implementation science capacity across multiple sites, and for promoting collaboration amongst SCI/D rehabilitation centers and organizational partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma A. Bateman
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Western University, London, Canada
- Parkwood Institute, St. Joseph’s Health Care London, London, Canada
| | | | - Farnoosh Farahani
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Ivie K. Evbuomwan
- Parkwood Institute Research, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Canada
| | - Heather M. Flett
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anellina Ventre
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Dalton L. Wolfe
- Parkwood Institute Research, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Canada
- School of Health Studies, Western University, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kalsi-Ryan S, Kapadia N, Gagnon DH, Verrier MC, Holmes J, Flett H, Farahani F, Alavinia SM, Omidvar M, Wiest MJ, Craven BC. Development of Reaching, Grasping & Manipulation indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project. J Spinal Cord Med 2021; 44:S134-S146. [PMID: 34779738 PMCID: PMC8604521 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1961052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the development of structure, process, and outcome indicators aimed to advance the quality of Reaching, Grasping & Manipulation (RG&M) rehabilitation for Canadians living with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D). METHOD Upper extremity rehabilitation experts developed a framework of indicators for evaluation of RG&M rehabilitation quality. A systematic search of the literature identified potential upper extremity indicators that influence RG&M outcomes. A Driver diagram summarized factors influencing upper extremity outcomes to inform the selection of structure and process indicators. Psychometric properties, clinical utility, and feasibility of potential upper extremity measures were considered when selecting outcome indicators. RESULTS The selected structure indicator is the number of occupational and physical therapists with specialized certification, education, training and/or work experience in upper extremity therapy related to RG&M at a given SCI/D rehabilitation center. The process indicator is the total hours of upper extremity therapies related to RG&M and the proportion of this time allocated to neurorestorative therapy for each individual with tetraplegia receiving therapy. The outcome indicators are the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensation and Prehension (GRASSP) strength and Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) Self-Care subscores implemented at rehabilitation admission and discharge, and SCIM III Self-Care subscore only at 18 months post-admission. CONCLUSION The selected indicators align with current practice, will direct the timing of routine assessments, and enhance the volume and quality of RG&M therapy delivered, with the aim to ultimately increase the proportion of individuals with tetraplegia achieving improved upper extremity function by 18 months post-rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rocket Family Upper Extremity Clinic, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Naaz Kapadia
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rocket Family Upper Extremity Clinic, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- CRANIA, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Dany H. Gagnon
- School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation du Montréal métropolitain - CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l’Ile-de-Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Molly C. Verrier
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer Holmes
- Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Heather Flett
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Farnoosh Farahani
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - S. Mohammad Alavinia
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maryam Omidvar
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matheus J. Wiest
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bayley MT, Kirby RL, Farahani F, Titus L, Smith C, Routhier F, Gagnon DH, Stapleford P, Alavinia SM, Craven BC. Development of Wheeled Mobility indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project. J Spinal Cord Med 2019; 42:130-140. [PMID: 31573457 PMCID: PMC6783799 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1647934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Wheeled mobility is critical for individuals with Spinal Cord Injury or Disease (SCI/D) related paralysis. The World Health Organization (WHO) developed guidelines highlighting eight steps in wheelchair service delivery: (1) referral and appointment; (2) assessment; (3) prescription; (4) funding and ordering; (5) product preparation; (6) fitting; (7) user training; and, (8) follow-up maintenance/repairs. This article describes the processes used to develop structure, process and outcome indicators that reflect the WHO guidelines within the Domain of Wheeled Mobility rehabilitation for Canadians. Methods: Wheeled mobility experts within the SCI-High Project Team used the WHO guideline to inform the Construct refinement and development of a Driver diagram. Following seven meetings, the Driver diagram and review of outcome measures and literature synthesis regarding wheelchair service delivery informed indicator selection and group consensus. Results: The structure indicator examines the proportion of SCI/D service providers within a rehabilitation program who have specialized wheelchair training to ensure prescription, preparation, fitting, and maintenance quality. The process indicator evaluates the average number of hours of wheelchair service delivery provided per patient during rehabilitation. The intermediary outcome indicator (rehabilitation discharge), is a target capacity score on the Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q). The final outcome indicators (at 18 months post rehabilitation admission) are the Life Space Assessment (LSA) and the Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale (WheelCon) short form mean scores. Conclusion: Routine implementation of the selected Wheeled Mobility structure, process and outcome indicators should measurably advance care within the Wheeled Mobility Domain for Canadians living with SCI/D by 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark T. Bayley
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - R. Lee Kirby
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Farnoosh Farahani
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura Titus
- School of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cher Smith
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - François Routhier
- Department of Rehabilitation, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Dany H. Gagnon
- School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Patricia Stapleford
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - S. Mohammad Alavinia
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Correspondence to: B. Catharine Craven, Neural Engineering & Therapeutic Team, KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute- University Health Network, 520 Sutherland Drive, Toronto, ON, Canada, M4G 3V9; Ph: (416) 597-3422.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rowan CP, Chan BCF, Jaglal SB, Catharine Craven B. Describing the current state of post-rehabilitation health system surveillance in Ontario - an invited review. J Spinal Cord Med 2019; 42:21-33. [PMID: 31573448 PMCID: PMC6781471 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1605724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Context: Spinal cord injury (SCI) presents numerous physiological, psychosocial, and environmental complexities resulting in significant healthcare system resource demands. Objective: To describe the current health system surveillance mechanisms in Ontario, Canada and highlight gaps in health surveillance among adults with SCI across their lifespan. Methods: A review of administrative data sources capturing SCI-specific information took place via internet searching and networking among SCI rehabilitation and health services experts with emphasis on functionality, health service utilization, and quality of life data. Results: The review identified a distinct paucity of data elements specific to the health surveillance needs of individuals with SCI living in the community. The gaps identified are: (1) a lack of data usability; (2) inadequate linkage between available datasets; (3) inadequate/infrequent reporting of outcomes; (4) a lack of relevant content/patient-reported outcomes; and, (5) failure to incorporate additional data sources (e.g. Insurance datasets). Conclusion: Currently, SCI-specific health data is disproportionately weighted towards the first 3-6 months post injury with detailed data regarding pre-hospital care, acute management and rehabilitation, but little existing infrastructure supporting community-based health surveillance. Given this reality, the bolstering of meaningful community health surveillance of this population across the lifespan is needed. Addressing the identified gaps in health surveillance must inform the creation of a comprehensive community health dataset incorporating patient-reported outcome measures and enabling linkage with existing administrative and/or clinical databases. A future harmonized data surveillance strategy would, in turn, positively impact function, health services, resource utilization and health-related quality of life surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chip P. Rowan
- KITE, Toronto Rehab — University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Correspondence to: Chip P. Rowan, Research Department, KITE, Toronto Rehab — University Health Network, Lyndhurst Centre, 520 Sutherland Dr, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4G 3V9; Ph: 416-597-3422 x6217.
| | - Brian C. F. Chan
- KITE, Toronto Rehab — University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan B. Jaglal
- KITE, Toronto Rehab — University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- KITE, Toronto Rehab — University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Elliott S, Jeyathevan G, Hocaloski S, O’Connell C, Gulasingam S, Mills S, Farahani F, Kaiser A, Mohammad Alavinia S, Omidvar M, Craven BC. Conception and development of Sexual Health indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project. J Spinal Cord Med 2019; 42:68-84. [PMID: 31573441 PMCID: PMC6781482 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1612642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Context: Although spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) results in complex biological and psychosocial impairments that adversely impact an individual's overall quality of sexual life, sexual health is poorly integrated into the current rehabilitation processes. Therefore, it is vital to promote sexual health as a rehabilitation priority. Herein, we describe the selection of Sexual Health structure, process and outcome indicators for adults with SCI/D in the first 18 months after rehabilitation admission. Methods: Experts in sexual health and the SCI-High team identified key factors that influence the sexual health outcomes of rehabilitation interventions to inform Driver diagram development. This diagram informed the selection and development of indicators to promote a permissive environment for discussion of sexual health issues among regulated health care professionals (HCPs). A review of literature and psychometric properties of measurement tools facilitated final indicators selection. Results: The structure indicator is the proportion of rehabilitation HCPs who have completed annual preliminary sexual health training. The process indicator is the proportion of SCI/D inpatients that have a documented introduction to available local sexual health resources. The outcome indicator is a sexual health patient questionnaire used to assess sexual health patient outcomes and sexual health information/educational needs. Rapid-cycle piloting verified that the indicator tools developed are feasible for implementation. Conclusion: Successful implementation of the Sexual Health structure, process and outcome indicators will promote a permissive environment to enable open discussion, and lead to provision of equitable and optimal care related to sexual health following SCI/D. This will ultimately advance sexual health rehabilitation across the nation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy Elliott
- Sexual Health Rehabilitation Service, GF Strong Rehabilitation Center & Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,Faculty of Medicine, ICORD, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,BC Center for Sexual Medicine, Vancouver Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gaya Jeyathevan
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shea Hocaloski
- Sexual Health Rehabilitation Service, GF Strong Rehabilitation Center & Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Colleen O’Connell
- Stan Cassidy Centre for Rehabilitation, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Sivakumar Gulasingam
- Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sandra Mills
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Farnoosh Farahani
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anita Kaiser
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Canadian Spinal Research Organization, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - S. Mohammad Alavinia
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maryam Omidvar
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Correspondence to: B. Catharine Craven, Neural Engineering & Therapeutic Team, KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, 520 Sutherland Drive, Toronto, ON M4G 3V9, Canada; Ph: (416) 597-3422 (ext: 6122).
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wiest MJ, West C, Ditor D, Furlan JC, Miyatani M, Farahani F, Alavinia SM, Oh PI, Bayley MT, Craven BC. Development of Cardiometabolic Health indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project. J Spinal Cord Med 2019; 42:166-175. [PMID: 31573456 PMCID: PMC6781462 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1613322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Context: Spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) leads to unchanged low-density lipoprotein and cholesterol, very low high-density lipoprotein a form of dyslipidemia and physical inactivity which combine to increase risk of morbidity and mortality from cardiometabolic disease. Herein, we describe the selection of structure, process and outcome indicators for adults in the first 18 months post-SCI/D rehabilitation admission. Methods: A Pan-Canadian Cardiometabolic Health Working Group was formed to develop a construct definition. Cardiometabolic risk factors were summarized in a Driver diagram. Release of the Paralyzed Veterans of America "Identification and Management of Cardiometabolic Risk after Spinal Cord Injury" and the International Scientific Exercise Guidelines: "Evidence-based scientific exercise guidelines for adults with spinal cord injury", informed the group's focus on prevention strategies to advance this Domain of rehabilitation admission. Results: The structure indicator identifies during rehabilitation the presence of appropriate time and resources for physical exercise prescription. Process indicators are lipid profile assessment at rehabilitation admission and documented exercise prescriptions prior to discharge. The outcome indicators track patient's knowledge retention regarding exercise prescription at discharge, current exercise adherence and lipid status 18 months after rehabilitation discharge. Conclusion: Routine national implementation of these indicators at the specified time points will enhance efforts to detect dyslipidemia and assure routine participation in endurance exercise. These indicators align with international initiatives to improve cardiometabolic health through interventions targeting modifiable risk factors specifically endurance exercising and optimal lipid profiles, crucial to augmenting cardiometabolic health after SCI/D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matheus J. Wiest
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher West
- Cell & Physiological Sciences, Southern Medical Program, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada,ICORD, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - David Ditor
- Faculty of Applied Health Science, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julio C. Furlan
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Masae Miyatani
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Farnoosh Farahani
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - S. Mohammad Alavinia
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul I. Oh
- Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark T. Bayley
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Correspondence to: B. Catharine Craven, Neural Engineering & Therapeutic Team, KITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network 520 Sutherland Drive, Toronto, ON M4G 3V9, Canada; Ph: (416) 597-3422 (ext: 6122).
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Musselman KE, Verrier MC, Flett H, Nadeau S, Yang JF, Farahani F, Alavinia SM, Omidvar M, Wiest MJ, Craven BC. Development of Walking indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project. J Spinal Cord Med 2019; 42:119-129. [PMID: 31573443 PMCID: PMC6783800 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1647385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To describe the development of structure, process and outcome indicators that will advance the quality of walking rehabilitation for Canadians with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) by 2020. Method: A framework for the evaluation of the quality of walking rehabilitation was developed by experts in walking after SCI/D. A systematic literature review identified factors influencing walking outcomes and potential walking indicators. A Driver diagram analysis summarized the factors affecting walking outcomes and subsequently informed the selection of structure and process indicators. Psychometric properties and clinical utility of potential walking indicators were considered during the selection of outcome indicators. Results: The structure indicator is the number of physical therapists using evidence-based walking interventions per number of ambulatory individuals with SCI/D. The process indicator is the number of received hours of walking interventions during inpatient rehabilitation per number of ambulatory individuals with SCI/D. The intermediary outcome indicator, which is collected at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, is either the modified Timed Up and Go or the 10-Meter Walk Test, the choice of measure is dictated by the stage of walking recovery, as defined by the Standing and Walking Assessment Tool. The final outcome indicator, collected at 18 months post-discharge, is the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III-Mobility subscale. Conclusion: The selected indicators align with current clinical practice in Canada. The indicators will direct the timing and enhance the volume of walking therapy delivered, to ultimately increase the proportion of patients who achieve their walking potential by 18 months post-rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin E. Musselman
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Molly C. Verrier
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Heather Flett
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sylvie Nadeau
- School of Rehabilitation, University of Montreal and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation (CRIR), CIUSSS Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jaynie F. Yang
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Farnoosh Farahani
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - S. Mohammad Alavinia
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maryam Omidvar
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matheus J. Wiest
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada,Correspondence to: B. Catharine Craven, FRCPC, KITE – Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, 206-H 520 Sutherland Drive, Toronto, ON M4G3V9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Craven BC, Alavinia SM, Gajewski JB, Parmar R, Disher S, Ethans K, Shepherd J, Omidvar M, Farahani F, Hassouna M, Welk B. Conception and development of Urinary Tract Infection indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project. J Spinal Cord Med 2019; 42:205-214. [PMID: 31573440 PMCID: PMC6781249 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1647928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Context: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are the most frequent secondary health condition following spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) that adversely impact overall health and quality of life, and often result in rehabilitation service interruptions, emergency department visits, and urinary sepsis. Methods: Experts in Urohealth and/or UTI recognition and management and the SCI-High Project Team used a combination of evidence synthesis and consensus methods for developing the UTI indicators. A systematic search and a Driver diagram analysis were applied to identify key factors influencing UTI. This Driver diagram guided the UTI Working Group when defining the construct, specifying the aim for the UTI SCI/D quality indicators, and developing the UTI diagnostic checklist and fever definition. Results: The structure indicator was the proportion of patients with a health care professional (i.e. family physician or urologist) able to follow-up with the patient regarding urine culture and sensitivity results within 48-72 h of collection. The Working Group knowingly adopted a single checklist for UTI diagnosis, recognizing the stark contrast in the complexity of diagnosis in acute versus community settings. The process indicator is the proportion of SCI/D rehabilitation inpatients with UTI as defined by the UTI diagnostic checklist. The outcome indicator is the proportion of SCI/D rehabilitation inpatients with inappropriate antibiotic prescription. Conclusion: UTI can be diagnosed using the developed symptoms and signs checklist. These structure, process, and outcome quality indicators will ultimately reduce inappropriate antibiotic therapy for UTI and the rising incidence of antibiotic resistance among community-dwelling individuals with chronic SCI/D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B. Catharine Craven
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Correspondence to: B. Catharine Craven, KITE – Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, 206-H 520 Sutherland Drive, Toronto, Ontario M4G3V9, Canada; Ph: 416-597-3422 x6122.
| | - S. Mohammad Alavinia
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Raj Parmar
- Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Clinic, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Canada
| | - Sandi Disher
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karen Ethans
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - John Shepherd
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Faculty of Medicine, Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maryam Omidvar
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Farnoosh Farahani
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Magdy Hassouna
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Blayne Welk
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hitzig SL, Titman R, Orenczuk S, Clarke T, Flett H, Noonan VK, Bain P, Mills S, Farahani F, Wiest MJ, Jeyathevan G, Alavinia SM, Craven BC. Development of Emotional Well-Being indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project. J Spinal Cord Med 2019; 42:85-98. [PMID: 31573461 PMCID: PMC6783797 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1605750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Context: Emotional Well-Being (EWB) post-spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) is a critical aspect of adjustment to disability. Advancing care and assuring equity in care delivery within this rehabilitation care domain is essential. Herein, we describe the selection of EWB structure, process and outcome indicators for adults with SCI/D in the first 18 months after rehabilitation admission. Methods: A pan-Canadian Working Group completed the following tasks: (1) defined the EWB construct; (2) conducted a systematic review of available outcomes and their psychometric properties; (3) constructed a Driver diagram summarizing available evidence associated with EWB; and, (4) prepared a process map. Facilitated meetings allowed selection and review of feedback following rapid-cycle evaluations of proposed structure, process and outcome indicators. Results: The structure indicator is the proportion of staff with appropriate education and training in EWB and access to experts and resources. The process indicator is the proportion of SCI/D patients who were screened for depression and anxiety symptoms at rehabilitation admission and rehabilitation discharge. The intermediary outcome is the proportion of SCI/D patients at risk for depression or anxiety at rehabilitation discharge based on screening symptom scores. The final outcomes are: (a) proportion of individuals at risk for depression or anxiety based on screening symptom scores; and (b) proportion of individuals who received referral for EWB services or intervention. Conclusion: The proposed indicators have a low administrative burden and will ensure feasibility of screening for depression and anxiety at important transition points for individuals with SCI/D. We anticipate that the current structures have inadequate resources for at-risk individuals identified during the screening process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander L. Hitzig
- St. John’s Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada,Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rebecca Titman
- Division of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Steven Orenczuk
- Parkwood Institute Research, St. Joseph’s Health Care, London, ON, Canada,Spinal Cord Injury Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - Heather Flett
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada,Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vanessa K. Noonan
- Rick Hansen Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada,Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Patricia Bain
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sandra Mills
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Farnoosh Farahani
- KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Matheus Joner Wiest
- KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gaya Jeyathevan
- KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S. Mohammad Alavinia
- Division of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada,KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada,Division of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada,Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada,KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada,Correspondence to: B. Catharine Craven, Neural Engineering & Therapeutic Team, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute- University Health Network, Lyndhurst Centre, 520 Sutherland Drive, Toronto, ON M4G 3V9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Flett H, Wiest MJ, Mushahwar V, Ho C, Hsieh J, Farahani F, Alavinia SM, Omidvar M, Houghton PE, Craven BC. Development of Tissue Integrity indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project. J Spinal Cord Med 2019; 42:196-204. [PMID: 31573460 PMCID: PMC6781468 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1621025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To establish structure, process and outcome indicators to evaluate tissue integrity in Canadians with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) in the first 18 months following inpatient rehabilitation admission. Method: A Working Group comprised of Canadian subject matter experts in the Domain of Tissue Integrity was formed to define the construct of tissue integrity. A literature review was conducted and a Driver diagram produced to identify factors that influence tissue integrity in individuals with SCI/D. Facilitated meetings were conducted to identify and achieve consensus on structure, process and outcome indicators. Rapid cycle testing was used to pilot test proposed indicators for face validity and feasibility within a quality improvement context. Results: The structure indicators are the proportion of patients with SCI/D who have access to a mirror for skin checks and the proportion of patients who have access to patient education on tissue integrity; the process indicator is the proportion of patients who completed daily head-to-toe skin checks; the intermediary outcome indicator is pressure injury (PI) incidence during inpatient rehabilitation; and the final outcome indicator is the proportion of individuals with intact skin at 18 months following rehabilitation admission. Conclusion: The set of indicators established for the Domain of Tissue Integrity are specifically focused on aspects of care that can impact the maintenance of tissue integrity and the prevention of PI and align with current practice guidelines. The implementation and evaluation of these indicators nationally have the potential to improve care for Canadians with SCI/D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Flett
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matheus J. Wiest
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vivian Mushahwar
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Chester Ho
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jane Hsieh
- Lawson Health Research Institute, Parkwood Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Farnoosh Farahani
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - S. Mohammad Alavinia
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maryam Omidvar
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pamela E. Houghton
- School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- KITE, Toronto Rehab – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|