Predictors of Patient-Centered Communication among U.S. Adults: Analysis of the 2017-2018 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS)

Ethnic Disparities in Patient-Centered Communication with Healthcare Providers: A Comparison of Non-Hispanic Asians and Non-Hispanic Whites

BACKGROUND

Patient-centered communication (PCC) is an important metric related to patient health outcomes. Non-Hispanic Asian (NHA) individuals reported lower PCC scores with healthcare providers than individuals of other races and ethnicities. We aim to determine the ethnic disparities in PCC and further investigate the association between PCC, individual's confidence in obtaining health-related information (health literacy), and confidence in taking care of themselves (health self-efficacy) among NHA in comparison to the Non-Hispanic White (NHW) population.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study. We used data from the Health Information National Trends Survey 5 (HINTS) cycles 1 and 3. PCC was measured using seven validated survey questions with scores ranging from 7 to 28. Individuals' health literacy and self-efficacy were accessed using two-item survey questions. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association of independent factors (e.g., self-efficacy, health literacy, and race and ethnicity) with PCC.

RESULTS

We included 3,831 participants. Fewer NHAs (35.43%) reported high PCC scores compared to NHWs (48.99%, p = 0.0184). In fully adjusted logistic regression model, although NHAs were less likely to have high PCC scores (aOR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.46-1.32) compared to NHWs, the association was not statistically significant (p = 0.350). However, the aOR of confidence in self-efficacy associated with high PCC scores was 2.27 (95% CI 1.68-3.07, p < 0.001) and the aOR of confidence in health literacy with high PCC scores was 2.13 (95% CI 1.64-2.76, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

High PCC scores reported by NHA were not significantly different from those of NHW individuals in adjusted comparisons. Individual's confidence in self-efficacy and health literacy was positively associated with high PCC regardless of race and ethnicity.

From community to scale: Using community engagement to develop and validate a patient-informed cancer communication scale

OBJECTIVE

Racial disparities in clinical communication quality are well-established but most clinical communication assessment tools are created without the collaboration of racially-diverse patient populations. Our objective was to collaborate with Black and White cancer survivors, caregivers, and advocates to develop and validate a tool to assess physicians' patient-centered communication.

METHODS

A panel of Black and White cancer survivors, caregivers, and advocates (n = 11) and researchers observed and discussed video-recorded patient-physician cancer clinical interactions to generate and refine a list of physician communication behaviors considered critical for high-quality patient-centered communication. Raters applied the 22-item scale (Patient-Informed Cancer Communication Scale; PICCS) assessing physicians' patient-centered communication to video-recorded interactions (n = 61) from a larger study. We determined constructs using scale development and factor analysis and validated the scale through correlation with existing scales.

RESULTS

Factor analysis identified five factors: treatment options; clinical relationship; prognosis and goals of treatment; explanations; and context. Treatment options, prognosis and goals of treatment, and the full scale correlated with a validated patient active participation scale. Clinical relationship and context correlated with a validated physicians' patient-centered communication scale.

CONCLUSION

This community-engaged research produced a reliable and valid scale to assess physician patient-centered communication in the context of Black and White people with cancer.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

With further validation work, this scale can be used to train and assess physician communication quality when discussing cancer treatment in diverse cancer patient populations.

Racial equity in and through medical interaction scholarship: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic scoping review to characterize the landscape of communication scholarship within racial health equity in and through the patient-provider interaction.

METHODS

We employed three waves of data collection to identify relevant articles (N = 454) about racial equity within provider-patient interactions. We iteratively developed a codebook concerning article characteristics, coding for journal names, data source, descriptive characteristics for the study samples, and presence of theory and equity in sections of the manuscripts.

RESULTS

This search identified studies (N = 206) that were published in 76 peer-reviewed scientific journals. The majority of studies reported primary data analyses and used survey and interview methodology. Many studies examined participants as patients generally rather than in reference to particular health conditions. Among those with a specific health condition, the largest proportion focused on cancer control. Very few studies included samples with Native American and Pacific Island heritage. Most studies included cisgender men and/or women, but none included transgender men or women. The vast majority of research focused on the patient experience; few centered on providers' and caregivers' experiences. The body of scholarship was largely atheoretical; the most frequently noted constructs were patient-provider communication (including patient-centered communication and patient-centered care), implicit/explicit racial bias, shared decision-making. There was wide variation in the extent to which equity was woven through the manuscripts. Equity is typically mentioned in the literature review, and racial identity in the sample may serve as a marker of racialized experiences.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the need for the development of theory that elevates the centrality of health equity to attend to the bi- or multi-directional flow of communication that shapes the quality of these interactions.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

These insights can serve as a strong foundation for the development of interventions to address equity in clinical interactions.

Contributions to Research and Practice Made by the National Cancer Institute's Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch

The Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch at the U.S. National Cancer Institute was founded in 1999 in response to increasing evidence demonstrating a link between effective health communication and improved cancer-related outcomes and in recognition of the rapid and dramatic technological changes that were transforming health communication at the turn of the 21st century. For the past 25 years, the Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch has been conducting and supporting research at the forefront of emerging cancer communication trends and technologies, making numerous contributions to health communication science, public health, and cancer control practice. In this essay, we provide a brief history of the branch and the context that led to its establishment, discuss contributions made by the branch to health communication research and practice through key projects and initiatives, and conclude by highlighting health communication and informatics research priorities that offer opportunities for significant impact going forward in light of the challenges posed by the current communication environment.

Patients' Use of Electronic Health Records Facilitates Patient-Centered Communication: Findings From the 2017 Health Information National Trends Survey

BACKGROUND

Patient-centered communication refers to interaction between patients and health professionals that considers patients' preferences and empowers patients to contribute to their own care. Research suggests that patient-centered communication promotes patients' satisfaction with care, trust in physicians, and competence in their abilities to manage their health.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to explore the role of patients' use of electronic health records (EHRs) in promoting patient-centered communication. Specifically, we investigated how health information efficacy mediates the association of EHR use with patient-centered communication and whether and how the relationship between EHR use and health information efficacy varies according to patients' perceived social support levels.

METHODS

We conducted mediation and multigroup analyses using nationally representative data from the Health Information National Trends Survey 5 cycle 1 conducted in the United States (N=3285). Among respondents, we analyzed those who received care from health professionals over the previous year (2823/3285, 85.94%).

RESULTS

EHR use by patients was associated with high levels of health information efficacy (unstandardized coefficient=0.050, SE 0.024; P=.04). In turn, health information efficacy was positively related to patient-centered communication (unstandardized coefficient=0.154, SE 0.024; P<.001). The indirect pathway from EHR use to patient-centered communication, mediated by health information efficacy, was statistically significant (unstandardized coefficient=0.008, SE 0.004; P=.04). Among patients with high social support (2349/2823, 83.21%), EHR use was not significantly associated with health information efficacy (unstandardized coefficient=0.038, SE 0.026; P=.15), although health information efficacy was linked to high levels of patient-centered communication (unstandardized coefficient=0.151, SE 0.030; P<.001). The indirect relationship in this group was not significant (unstandardized coefficient=0.006, SE 0.004; P=.11). However, among those with low social support (474/2823, 16.79%), EHR use was positively associated with health information efficacy (unstandardized coefficient=0.155, SE 0.048; P=.001), which in turn relates to high levels of patient-centered communication (unstandardized coefficient=0.137, SE 0.050; P=.01). The indirect pathway was also significant (unstandardized coefficient=0.021, SE 0.010; P=.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who use EHRs may build health information efficacy, which seems to promote communication between patients and health care providers. This indirect pathway was not detected among patients with high social support. However, among those with low social support, EHR use seems to enhance health information efficacy, which may in turn facilitate patient-centered communication. Given the nature of the dataset used, the findings of this study are more relevant to the United States than other contexts.

Evaluating cancer patients' experiences with doctor-patient communication in Taiwan: development and validation of a new assessment instrument

INTRODUCTION

Effective communication between doctors and patients is crucial for the well-being of individuals diagnosed with cancer. This study aimed to develop and validate a cancer-specific Doctor-Patient Communication Satisfaction Scale (DPCSS-Cancer) from the patients' perspective.

METHODS

Initial items were generated through literature review. Content validity was assessed via feedback from five experts, while face validity was determined through cognitive interviews with 13 patients. The revised DPCSS-Cancer was subsequently tested in a sample of 200 cancer patients to assess test-retest stability, internal consistency, factor structure, and criterion-related validity.

RESULTS

The development process resulted in a 15-item DPCSS-Cancer across two dimensions, using a 4-point rating scale (1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree). The item-level Content Validity Index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.8 to 1.0, with a scale-level CVI of 0.96. Following expert and patient feedback, no items were eliminated, but modifications were made to item wording. In formal testing, the overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.96, with 0.89 for the first dimension and 0.95 for the second. Test-retest reliability was established at 0.82. The two-dimensional structure was partially confirmed. Criterion-related validity was supported through a significant positive correlation with a measure of trust in the physician (r = 0.86). Factors contributing to higher DPCSS-Cancer scores were identified.

CONCLUSION

The DPCSS-Cancer shows satisfactory reliability and validity, making it a viable patient-reported outcome measure for assessing cancer patients' satisfaction with doctor-patient communication.

Factors affecting U.S. adults' comfort level in sharing social needs information with healthcare providers

OBJECTIVE

This study examines various factors affecting U.S. adults' comfort level in sharing information about their social needs with healthcare providers.

METHODS

We used data from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (cycle 6), a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults (n = 6252). The outcome variables were participants' comfort level in sharing information about three social needs (food insecurity, transportation difficulties, and housing instability). Data were analyzed using weighted bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Participants who faced discrimination when getting medical care based on race/ethnicity were more likely to be uncomfortable in sharing information about food insecurity, housing instability, and transportation difficulties. Those who trusted the healthcare system "a lot" were less likely to be uncomfortable in sharing information about food insecurity and transportation difficulties. Patient-Centered Communication (PCC) and social isolation scores significantly affected participants' comfort level in sharing information about social needs.

CONCLUSION

Various factors such as trust, discrimination, social isolation, and PCC were found to be significantly affecting US adults' comfort level in sharing information about social needs.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Healthcare systems and policymakers should focus on developing approaches and strategies to enhance trust, reduce discrimination, improve patient-provider communication, and create supportive social environments.

From Online to Offline: How Different Sources of Online Health Information Seeking Affect Patient-Centered Communication in Chinese Older Adults? The Roles of Patient Activation and Patient-Provider Discussion of Online Health Information

Despite the increasing prevalence of online health information seeking (OHIS) among older adults, its impact on patient-centered communication (PCC) outcomes remains unclear. Drawing from Street's ecological framework of communication in medical encounters, the present study examined the mediation role of patient activation in the relationship between OHIS across three media channels - social media, search engines, and mobile health applications (mHealth apps) - and PCC. Furthermore, it examines the moderation effect of patient-provider discussions of online health information. A national survey of 916 older Chinese adults aged 60-78 was conducted. The findings indicate that OHIS across the three channels can indirectly enhance PCC through patient activation. Moreover, OHIS via mHealth apps is positively associated with PCC, while the relationship between OHIS via social media/search engines and PCC is not significant. The interaction between patients and healthcare providers regarding online health information positively moderated all indirect paths. Notably, a great proportion of older adults (77.7%) engaged in discussions about online health information with healthcare providers. These findings emphasize the importance of considering various media channels and highlight the pivotal role of patient activation in bridging the gap between OHIS and satisfactory healthcare interactions, especially in the Chinese context.

Investigating the Relationship Between Patient-Centered Communication and Quality of E-Consult in China: A Cross-Sectional Standardized Patient Study

Patient-centered communication is widely acknowledged as an essential element of high-quality healthcare. Our study attempted to explore the weaknesses in the actual doctor-patient communication process and the most critical elements in patient-centered communication to improve the service quality of e-consult. We recruited ten standardized patients presenting fixed cases (urticaria and childhood diarrhea) for 321 valid interactions to measure patient-centered communication and e-consult service quality. The scores of patient-centered communication included exploring the patient's disease experience, understanding the patient's social situation, and reaching a consensus between doctors and patients. We measured the quality of e-consult services by the total words of doctor's responses, accurate diagnosis, appropriate prescription, lifestyle modification advice, patient satisfaction, continuance intention, and cost. Ordinary least-squares and logistic regression were performed to investigate the association between patient-centered communication and e-consult service quality. The total mean score of patient-centered communication was 17.67. The mean words of responses and cost were 178.55 words and 39.46 yuan, respectively. 82.87% of doctors diagnosed accurately, with 21.81% prescribing appropriate prescriptions and 81.93% providing lifestyle modification advice. 254 interactions obtained high satisfaction, and 218 had continuance intention after the interactions. Doctors with higher patient-centered communication levels would provide more words of responses. They were more likely to provide accurate diagnoses, appropriate prescriptions, and lifestyle modification advice, resulting in better patient satisfaction, continuance intention, and higher costs. Therefore, it is necessary to standardize and improve the doctor-patient communication process of e-consult and develop training for different doctors.

Perceptions of patient-provider communications with healthcare providers among sexual and gender minority individuals in the United States

OBJECTIVES

To identify perceived differences in the key domains of patient-provider communications between sexual and gender minority (SGM) and non-SGM patients.

METHODS

We reviewed data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) to assess patient perspectives on different domains of patient-provider communications in the ideological framework by Epstein and Street (2007) [1]. Between SGM-identified (N = 491) and cisgender, heterosexual respondents (N = 7426), we assessed the proportions of responses to survey questions about the six domains of patient-provider communications and calculated odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) (N = 7917).

RESULTS

Overall, compared to cisgender, heterosexual individuals, fewer SGM individuals reported always experiencing optimal patient-provider communications across all domains, most notably in areas of emotional support (OR=0.70, 95 % CI: (0.51, 0.97)), patient self-management (OR=0.73, 95 % CI: (0.54, 0.99)), and managing uncertainty (OR=0.68, 95 % CI: (0.49, 0.94)).

CONCLUSION

Further research on detailed SGM patient perceptions of their relationships with healthcare providers is needed to understand why such differences in communication exist and provide practical recommendations to improve care delivery.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

SGM patients perceive their current provider communications to be suboptimal, so we must improve emotional management training in future provider-based SGM competency trainings and encourage patient self-management during individual provider encounters.

Functions of patient- and family-centered pediatric cancer communication in Pakistan

Background

Communication is an essential aspect of high-quality patient- and family-centered care. A model for pediatric cancer communication developed in the United States defined eight communication functions. The purpose of this study was to explore the relevance of these functions in Pakistan as part of an effort to understand the role of culture in communication.

Materials and methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 clinicians and 18 caregivers of children with cancer at two major cancer centers. Interviews were conducted in Urdu or English and transcribed and translated as necessary. Two independent coders used a priori codes related to the communication model as well as novel codes derived inductively. Thematic analysis focused on operationalization of the functional communication model.

Results

Clinicians and caregivers in Pakistan discussed the importance of all eight communication functions previously identified including: information exchange, decision-making, managing uncertainty, enabling family self-management, responding to emotions, supporting hope, providing validation, and building relationships. The operationalization of these functions was influenced by Pakistani cultural context. For example, information-exchange included the importance of addressing preconceptions and community myths, while managing uncertainty included strong references to religion and faith-based coping. Essential to all eight functions was trust between the family and the medical team.

Discussion

These findings support the use of this functional communication model in diverse pediatric oncology settings and emphasize the importance of trust. Culturally sensitive operationalization of these functions could inform the adaptation of tools to measure communication and interventions aimed at supporting the needs of parents of children with cancer.

Communication Matters: The Role of Patient-Centered Communication in Improving Old Adults' Health Competence and Health Outcomes

Research has demonstrated links between patient-centered communication (PCC) and patients' health outcomes. However, little is known about the underlying processes that may mediate the relationship. This study is one of the first to examine the influence of PCC on older adults' health outcomes, as well as the mediation role of health competence, from a longitudinal perspective. With a general basis of Street et al.'s pathway model, we proposed and tested mediation pathways linking patient-centered communication to the older population's general and mental health, mediated by health competence. Data from 2011, 2017 and 2020 iterations of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) were used for this study. This study focused on older adults aged 60 and above. Results indicated that after controlling participants' age, gender, education, income and race, PCC is related to the older people's health outcomes either directly or indirectly, irrespective of time series. Specifically, health competence was found to significantly mediate the associations between PCC and the older adults' general health or mental health over the three iterations. Noteworthily, findings from this study also revealed that different dimensions of PCC might exert different influences on older patients' health competence and health outcomes.

Role of digital health communication, sociodemographic factors, and medical conditions on perceived quality of patient-centered communication

OBJECTIVE

To simultaneously explore associations between digital health, sociodemographic factors, and medical conditions on patient-centered communication (PCC). These are under-explored, yet important knowledge gaps to fill because perceived quality PCC may influence health information seeking behaviors and health outcomes.

METHODS

Data from the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey were analyzed. The primary outcome was PCC, which was the summed score of 7 PCC-related questions. Factors of interest included whether participants used electronic methods to communicate with health professionals, age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, feelings about household income, and history of medical conditions. Descriptive statistics and linear regressions were conducted.

RESULTS

In the multivariate linear regression model, people aged 65-74 years compared with 18-34 year-olds, those with some college compared with college graduates, and those who felt they were living comfortably on their household income compared with all others reported higher PCC scores. People with a history of hypertension compared with those without reported higher PCC scores.

CONCLUSION

Similar to past studies, sociodemographic factors were associated with PCC. A novel finding was that a history hypertension was associated with perceived quality of PCC.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

This research may inform methods to enhance communication between patients and clinicians.

The association between electronic health information usage and patient-centered communication: a cross sectional analysis from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS)

BACKGROUND

Patient-provider communication can be assessed by the patient-centered communication (PCC) score. With rapid development of electronic health (eHealth) information usage, we are uncertain of their role in PCC. Our study aims to determine the association between PCC and eHealth usage with the analysis of national representative survey data.

METHODS

This is a cross sectional analysis using the Health Information National Trends Survey 5 (HINTS 5) cycle 1 to cycle 4 data (2017-2020). Seven specific questions were used for PCC assessment, and eHealth usage was divided into two types (private-eHealth and public-eHealth usage). A multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the association between PCC and eHealth usage after the adjustment of other social, demographic, and clinical variables.

RESULTS

Our study analyzed a total of 13,055 unweighted participants representing a weighted population of 791,877,728. Approximately 43% of individuals used private eHealth and 19% used public eHealth. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of private-eHealth usage associated with positive PCC was 1.17 (95% CI 1.02-1.35, p = 0.027). The AOR of public-eHealth usage associated with positive PCC was 0.84 (95% CI 0.71-0.99, p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

Our study found that eHealth usage association with PCC varies. Private-eHealth usage was positively associated with PCC, whereas public-eHealth usage was negatively associated with PCC.

Cancer survivors with sub-optimal patient-centered communication before and during the early COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVES

Patient-Centered Communication (PCC) is an essential element of patient-centered cancer care. Thus, this study aimed to examine the prevalence of and factors associated with optimal PCC among cancer survivors during COVID-19, which has been less studied.

METHODS

We used national survey (Health Information National Trends Survey) among cancer survivors (n = 2579) to calculate the prevalence (%) of optimal PCC in all 6 PCC domains and overall (mean) by time (before COVID-19, 2017-19 vs. COVID-19, 2020). Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to explore the associations of sociodemographic (age, birth gender, race/ethnicity, income, education, usual source of care), and health status (general health, depression/anxiety symptoms, time since diagnosis, cancer type) factors with optimal PCC.

RESULTS

The prevalence of optimal PCC decreased during COVID-19 overall, with the greatest decrease in managing uncertainty (7.3%). Those with no usual source of care (odd ratios, ORs =1.53-2.29), poor general health (ORs=1.40-1.66), depression/anxiety symptoms (ORs=1.73-2.17) were less likely to have optimal PCC in most domains and overall PCC.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed that the decreased prevalence of optimal PCC, and identified those with suboptimal PCC during COVID-19.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

More efforts to raise awareness and improve PCC are suggested, including education and guidelines, given the decreased prevalence during this public health emergency.

Communication matters when it comes to adverse events: Associations of adverse events during implant treatment with patients' communication quality and trust assessments

OBJECTIVES

Because patients' trust in their physicians is a critical factor in improving health outcomes and patient response to adverse events, it is important to analyze the determinants of trust. One of these determinants is patient-centered communication. Because the occurrence of adverse events must be communicated to the patient, we asked whether the perceived quality of patient-physician communication acts as an isolating factor between adverse events and patient trust.

METHODS

We proposed and tested a structural equation model linking the occurrence of adverse events to the mediator patient-provider communication quality and to the outcome patient trust. The model was controlled for sociodemographic and health-related factors. We used online survey data from German implant patients (n = 1312), as implant treatment is associated with frequent adverse events such as infections.

RESULTS

Our results show that adverse events during implant treatment are associated with small but significantly lower trust levels. Patient-provider communication quality partially mediates this association.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient trust does not appear to be immune to deterioration from adverse events. Patient-provider communication plays a role in mitigating this association.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

To improve the quality of care, attention should be paid to how adverse events are communicated in a patient-centered manner.

Trends and differences in perceptions of patient-centered communication among adults in the US

OBJECTIVE

Patient-centered communication (PCC) is a key indicator of healthcare quality and is critical to patient-centered care. The purpose of this study is to examine the trends in PCC over the past decade and determine if differences in PCC by subpopulation remain METHODS: We used nationally representative survey data from the Health Information National Trends Study (HINTS) to examine PCC. We conducted trend and multivariate regression analyses to understand the changes of PCC scores and differences in PCC by key sociodemographic groups.

RESULTS

PCC reported among adults minimally increased with the largest increases in participants involved in making decisions regarding their healthcare. Participants who were non-Hispanic Black, older, had less than a high school education, or rural residents reported more positive perceptions of PCC CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate improvements to PCC over time. These findings also indicate that differences in patients' perceptions of PCC continue to persist and it's possible that personal expectations may influence a person's perception of the quality of PCC experienced PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This study highlights the continued need for provider education in patient emotional support and providing patients with the skills and resources to engage in high quality PCC.

Identifying the Predictors of Patient-Centered Communication by Machine Learning Methods

Patient-centered communication (PCC) quality is critical to increasing the quality of patient-centered care. Based on the nationally representative data of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2019–2020 (N = 4593), this study combined four machine learning methods, namely, Generalized Linear Models (GLM), Random Forests (Random Forests), Deep Neural Networks (Deep Learning), and Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), to identify important PCC predictors through variable importance metrics. Fifteen variables were identified as important predictors, involving multiple dimensions, such as individual sociodemographic characteristics, health-related factors, and individual living habits. Among them, four novel potential associated variables are included, an individual’s level of verbal expression, exercise habits, etc., which significantly impacted respondents’ perceived PCC quality. This study revealed the value of combining feature selection with machine learning approaches to identify broad variables that could enhance PCC prediction and clinical decision-making, influence future PCC prediction research, and improve patient-centered care. In the future, other easy-to-interpret models can be combined to conduct further research on the impact direction and mechanism of important predictors on PCC.

Discrimination, trust, and withholding information from providers: Implications for missing data and inequity

Quality care requires collaborative communication, information exchange, and decision-making between patients and providers. Complete and accurate data about patients and from patients are especially important as high volumes of data are used to build clinical decision support tools and inform precision medicine initiatives. However, systematically missing data can bias these tools and threaten their effectiveness. Data completeness relies in many ways on patients being comfortable disclosing information to their providers without prohibitive concerns about security or privacy. Patients are likely to withhold information in the context of low trust relationships with providers, but it is unknown how experiences of discrimination in the healthcare system also relate to non-disclosure. In this study, we assess the relationship between withholding information from providers, experiences of discrimination, and multiple types of patient trust. Using a nationally representative sample of US adults (n = 2,029), weighted logistic regression modeling indicated a statistically significant relationship between experiences of discrimination and withholding information from providers (OR 3.7; CI [2.6-5.2], p < .001). Low trust in provider disclosure of conflicts of interest and low trust in providers' responsible use of health information were also positively associated with non-disclosure. We further analyzed the relationship between non-disclosure and the five most common types of discrimination (e.g., discrimination based on race, education/income, weight, gender, and age). We observed that all five types were statistically significantly associated with non-disclosure (p < .05). These results suggest that experiences of discrimination and specific types of low trust have a meaningful association with a patient's willingness to share information with their provider, with important implications for the quality of data available for medical decision-making and care. Because incomplete information can contribute to lower quality care, especially in the context of data-driven decision-making, patients experiencing discrimination may be further disadvantaged and harmed by systematic data missingness in their records.