Prehospital Epinephrine as a Potential Factor Associated with Prehospital Rearrest

Re-arrest immediately after return of spontaneous circulation: A retrospective observational study of in-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Patients who achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) may re-arrest. This phenomenon has not been sufficiently investigated. The aim of this study was to examine the immediate (1-min) and short-term (20-min) risks of re-arrest in IHCA.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed four datasets of IHCA episodes, comprising defibrillator recordings collected between 2002 and 2022. Re-arrest was defined as the resumption of chest compressions following a period of ROSC after cardiac arrest of any duration. Parametric models were applied to calculate the immediate risk of re-arrest. In addition, we estimated the short-term risk of re-arrest within 20 min.

RESULTS

In 763 episodes of IHCA, we observed 316 re-arrests: 68% to pulseless electrical activity (PEA), 25% to ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT), and 7% to asystole. Most re-arrests occurred with the same rhythm as in the initial arrest. When ROSC was achieved from a non-shockable rhythm, the risk of re-arrest to a non-shockable rhythm was initially 2% per minute and decreased to 1% per minute after 9 min. The corresponding risk of re-arrest to VF/VT was constant at 2% per minute. If ROSC was obtained from a shockable rhythm, the risk of re-arrest to a shockable rhythm was initially 5% per minute, decreasing to 4% per minute after 9 min. The corresponding risk to a non-shockable rhythm was constant at 1% per minute. The risk of re-arrest within 20 min was 27%, and the overall risk of at least one re-arrest per episode was 33%.

CONCLUSIONS

The immediate risk of re-arrest was approximately 2% per minute, with the highest risk occurring as a reversion to VF/VT if ROSC was obtained from VF/VT. The risk of re-arrest within 20 min of the initial arrest was 27%, and the overall risk of at least one re-arrest per episode was 33%.

Association of Prehospital Rearrest With Outcome Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

OBJECTIVES

Exposure to prehospital rearrest has previously been associated with mortality following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the association between prehospital rearrest and survival in adults following OHCA resuscitation.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science bibliographic databases for observational studies that included adult OHCA patients who achieved return of spontaneous circulation in the prehospital setting following OHCA and reported survival to hospital discharge data stratified by rearrest status. The primary exposure was prehospital rearrest. The primary outcome for this study was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included survival with a favorable neurological outcome and rearrest prevalence. We pooled data using inverse heterogeneity modeling and presented effect sizes for the survival outcomes as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. We quantified heterogeneity using Cochran's Q and the I2 statistic and examined small study effects using Doi plots and the LFK index.

RESULTS

Of the 84 publications screened, we included 7 observational studies containing 27,045 patients with survival to hospital discharge data. Rearrest was common (30% [18-43%]; n = 7 studies; Q = 1086.1, p < 0.001; I2 = 99%; LFK index = 1.21) and associated with both decreased odds of survival to discharge (pooled aOR: 0.27 [0.22, 0.33]; n = 7 studies; Q = 32.2, p < 0.01, I2 = 81%, LFK index = -0.08) and decreased odds of survival to discharge with a favorable neurological outcome (pooled aOR: 0.25, [0.22, 0.28]; n = 4 studies; Q = 3.5, p = 0.3; I2 = 13%, LFK index = 1.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Rearrest is common and associated with decreased survival following OHCA. The pooled result of this meta-analysis suggests that preventing rearrest in five patients would be necessary to save one life.

Incidence, risk factors, and impact of post-return of spontaneous circulation events in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A population-based study in Tokyo, Japan

AIM

Patients with the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are unstable and often experience rearrest, after which ROSC may be reattained. This study investigated the incidence and risk factors of post-ROSC events (rearrest and subsequent reattainment of ROSC) and their impact on outcomes in patients with prehospital ROSC following OHCA.

METHODS

Patients with OHCA and prehospital ROSC were identified from the Tokyo Fire Department database between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022. The factors associated with post-ROSC events and their impact on 1-month favourable neurological outcome (cerebral performance category scale: 1 or 2) were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 64,000 individuals experienced OHCA, and 6,190 (9.7%) had ROSC. Rearrest was confirmed in 28.4% of patients with ROSC, and was associated with age, time of emergency call, location of cardiac arrest, dispatcher instruction regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation, first recorded cardiac rhythm, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation by a bystander, response time, and prehospital interventions. ROSC reattainment was confirmed in 34.5% of patients with rearrest and associated with the first recorded cardiac rhythm and defibrillation by a bystander. Patients without rearrests had the highest proportion of favourable neurological outcomes, followed by those with solved and unsolved rearrests (38.6% vs. 22.4% and 4.4%, P < 0.001). The difference remained significant after adjustment for confounders.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed population-based incidence and risk factors of post-ROSC events. Rearrest was common, leading to unfavourable neurological outcome; however, its deleterious impact may be mitigated by successful resuscitation efforts.

The association of clinical, treatment, and demographic characteristics with rearrest in a national dataset

INTRODUCTION

Following initial resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, rearrest frequently occurs and has been associated with adverse outcomes. We aimed to identify clinical, treatment, and demographic characteristics associated with prehospital rearrest at the encounter and agency levels.

METHODS

Adult non-traumatic cardiac arrest patients who achieved ROSC following EMS resuscitation in the 2018-2021 ESO annual datasets were included in this study. Patients were excluded if they had a documented DNR/POLST or achieved ROSC after bystander CPR only. Rearrest was defined as post-ROSC CPR initiation, administration of ≥ 1 milligram of adrenaline, defibrillation, or a documented non-perfusing rhythm on arrival at the receiving hospital. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate the association between rearrest and case characteristics. Linear regression modeling was used to evaluate the association between agency-level factors (ROSC rate, scene time, and scene termination rate), and rearrest rate.

RESULTS

Among the 53,027 cases included, 16,116 (30.4%) experienced rearrest. Factors including longer response intervals, longer 'low-flow' intervals, unwitnessed OHCA, and a lack of bystander CPR were associated with rearrest. Among agencies that treated ≥ 30 patients with outcome data, the agency-level rate of rearrest was inversely associated with agency-level rate of survival to discharge to home (R2 = -0.393, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This multiagency retrospective study found that factors associated with increased ischaemic burden following OHCA were associated with rearrest. Agency-level rearrest frequency was inversely associated with agency-level survival to home. Interventions that decrease the burden of ischemia sustained by OHCA patients may decrease the rate of rearrest and increase survival.

Dynamic Course of Clinical State Transitions in Patients Undergoing Advanced Life Support after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

OBJECTIVES

Studies of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest generally document the presenting (pulseless electrical activity [PEA], ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia (VF/VT), asystole), and the final states (resuming stable spontaneous circulation [s-ROSC], being declared dead). Only a few studies described the transitions between clinical states during advanced life support (ALS). The aim of this study was to describe and analyze the dynamics of state transitions during ALS.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 464 OHCA events was conducted. Any observed state and its corresponding changing time were documented through continuous electrocardiographic and trans-thoracic impedance recording.

RESULTS

When achieved, most s-ROSCs were obtained by 30 min, regardless of the presenting state. After this time point, the persistence of any transient state was associated with a great probability of being declared dead. The most probable change for VF/VT or PEA at any time was the transition to asystole (36.4% and 34.4%, respectively); patients in asystole at any time had a 70% probability of death. Patients achieving s-ROSC mostly came from a VF/VT state.In most cases, the presenting rhythm tended to persist over time during ALS. Asystole was the most stable state; a higher degree of instability was observed when the presenting rhythms were VF/VT or PEA. Transient ROSC episodes occurred mainly as the first transition after the presenting state, especially for initial PEA.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of the dynamic course of clinical state transitions during ALS may allow treatment strategies to be tailored in patients affected by OHCA.

Association between a Post-Resuscitation Care Bundle and the Odds of Field Rearrest after Successful Resuscitation from Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Pre/Post Study

OBJECTIVES

Rearrest after successful resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is common and is associated with worse patient outcomes. However, little is known about the effect of interventions designed to prevent rearrest. We assessed the association between a prehospital care protocol for immediate management after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and rates of field rearrest and survival to discharge in patients with prehospital ROSC.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of adult patients with OHCA and field ROSC within a large EMS system before (April 2017-August 2018) and after (April 2019-February 2020) implementation of a structured prehospital post-ROSC care protocol. The protocol was introduced in September 2018 and provided on-scene stabilization direction including guidance on ventilation and blood pressure support. Field data and hospital outcomes were used to compare the frequency of field rearrest, hospital survival, and survival with good neurologic outcome before and after protocol implementation. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between the post-implementation period and these outcomes, and odds ratios were reported. The association between individual interventions on these outcomes was also explored.

RESULTS

There were 2,706 patients with ROSC after OHCA in the pre-implementation period and 1,780 patients in the post-implementation period. The rate of prehospital rearrest was 43% pre-implementation vs 45% post-implementation (RD 2%, 95% CI -1, 4%). In the adjusted analysis, introduction of the protocol was not associated with decreased odds of rearrest (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.73, 1.04), survival to hospital discharge (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81, 1.24), or survival with good neurologic outcome (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.61, 1.06). Post-implementation, post-ROSC administration of saline and push-dose epinephrine increased from 11% to 25% (RD 14%, 95% CI 11, 17%) and from 3% to 12% (RD 9% 95% CI 7, 11%), respectively. In an exploratory analysis, push-dose epinephrine was associated with a decreased odds of rearrest (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50, 0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Introduction of a post-ROSC care protocol for patients with prehospital ROSC after OHCA was not associated with reduced odds of field rearrest. When elements of the care bundle were considered individually, push-dose epinephrine was associated with decreased odds of rearrest.

Clinical Validation of Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis (CAHP) Score and MIRACLE2 Score to Predict Neurologic Outcomes after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a challenge for emergency physicians, given the poor prognosis. In 2020, MIRACLE2, a new and easier to apply score, was established to predict the neurological outcome of OHCA. Objective. The aim of this study is to compare the discrimination of MIRACLE2 score with cardiac arrest hospital prognosis (CAHP) score for OHCA neurologic outcomes. Methods. This retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2015 and December 2019. Adult patients (>17 years) with cardiac arrest who were brought to the hospital by an emergency medical service crew were included. Deaths due to trauma, burn, drowning, resuscitation not initiated due to pre-ordered “do not resuscitate” orders, and patients who did not achieve return of spontaneous circulation were excluded. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with Youden Index was performed to calculate optimal cut-off values for both scores. Results. Overall, 200 adult OHCA cases were analyzed. The threshold of the MIRACLE2 score for favorable neurologic outcomes was 5.5, with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.70 (0.61−0.80, p < 0.001); the threshold of the CAHP score was 223.4, with an AUC of 0.77 (0.68−0.86, p < 0.001). On setting the MIRACLE2 score cut-off value, we documented 64.7% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 56.9−71.9%), 66.7.0% specificity (95% CI, 48.2−82.0%), 90.8% positive predictive value (PPV; 95% CI, 85.6−94.2%), and 27.2% negative predictive value (NPV; 95% CI, 21.4−33.9%). On establishing a CAHP cut-off value, we observed 68.2% sensitivity (95% CI, 60.2−75.5%), 80.6% specificity (95% CI, 62.5−92.6%), 94.6% PPV (95% CI, 88.6%−98.0%), and 33.8% NPV (95% CI, 23.2−45.7%) for unfavorable neurologic outcomes. Conclusions. The CAHP score demonstrated better discrimination than the MIRACLE2 score, affording superior sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV; however, the CAHP score remains relatively difficult to apply. Further studies are warranted to establish scores with better discrimination and ease of application.

Effects of pre-hospital re-arrest on outcomes based on transfer to a heart attack centre in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

AIM

We aimed to investigate the interaction effects between transfer to a heart attack centre [HAC] and prehospital re-arrest on the clinical outcomes of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest [OHCA].

METHODS

We included adult patients with OHCA of presumed cardiac aetiology from January 2012 to December 2018. The main exposure variable was prehospital re-arrest, defined as recurrence of cardiac arrest with a loss of palpable pulse upon hospital arrival. The other exposure variable was the resuscitation capacity of the receiving hospital [HAC or Non-HAC]. The outcome variable was neurological recovery. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the interaction effects.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 6935 patients. Of these, 21.9% (n = 1521) experienced prehospital re-arrest, whereas 41.3% (n = 2866) were transferred to a non-HAC. The prehospital re-arrest group associated with poor neurological recovery (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.29;). Transfer to an HAC had beneficial effects on neurological recovery (AOR, 3.40 [95% CI, 3.04-3.85]. In the interaction model, wherein prehospital re-arrest patients who were transferred to a non-HAC were used as reference, the AOR of prehospital re-arrest patients who were transferred to an HAC, non-re-arrest patients who were transferred to a non-HAC, and non-re-arrest patients who were transferred to a non-HAC was 2.41 (95% CI, 1.73-3.35), 3.09 (95% CI, 2.33-4.10), and 11.07 (95% CI, 8.40-14.59) respectively (interaction p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Transport to a heart attack centre was beneficial to the clinical outcomes of patients who achieved prehospital ROSC after OHCA. The magnitude of that benefit was significantly modified by whether prehospital re-arrest had occurred.

Influence of the prehospital administered dosage of epinephrine on the plasma levels of catecholamines in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Aim

This study evaluated whether the prehospital administered dosage of epinephrine (Ep) influences the plasma levels of catecholamines in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Methods

This was a prospective, observational clinical study. Patients with OHCA transferred to our hospital between July 2014 and July 2017 were analyzed. The plasma levels of catecholamines were measured using blood samples obtained immediately upon arrival at the hospital and before the administration of Ep. Patients were divided into three groups based on the prehospital administered dosage of Ep: no prehospital administration (group Z); 1 mg of Ep (group O); and 2 mg of Ep (group T). The levels of catecholamines, as well as the conditions of resuscitation prior to and after arrival at the hospital were compared between the three groups.

Results

We analyzed 145 patients with OHCA (96, 38, and 11 patients in groups Z, O, and T, respectively). Group T exhibited the highest plasma levels of Ep with a statistically significant difference, however, there were no significant differences in the plasma levels of norepinephrine (Nep), dopamine (DOA) and vasopressin (ADH) among the three groups.

Conclusion

The prehospital administered dosage of Ep influences the plasma levels of Ep; however, it does not contribute to the plasma levels of Nep, DOA and ADH in patients with OHCA.