Capecitabine-associated enterocolitis: Narrative literature review of a rare adverse event and a case presentation

Capecitabine-associated gastrointestinal ulceration, haemorrhage, and obstruction: a pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FAERS

Background

Capecitabine has been reported to be associated with severe gastrointestinal (GI) adverse drug reactions (gastrointestinal ulceration, haemorrhage, and obstruction). However, statistical correlations have not been demonstrated, and specific GI adverse drug reactions, such as GI obstruction, are not listed on its label.

Aim

We aimed to determine the associations between capecitabine and GI ulceration, haemorrhage, or obstruction among patients with breast cancer by examining data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods

We performed disproportionality analysis of GI ulceration, haemorrhage, and obstruction by evaluating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the information component (IC) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

We identified 279 patients with capecitabine-associated GI ulceration, haemorrhage, or obstruction reported between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2020. One-fourth of the cases of GI ulceration, haemorrhage, or obstruction resulted in death. Capecitabine as a drug class had disproportionately high reporting rates for GI ulceration [ROR 1.94 (1.71-2.21); IC 0.80 (0.60-0.99)], haemorrhage [ROR 2.27 (1.86-2.76); IC 0.99 (0.69-1.28)], and obstruction [ROR 2.19 (1.63-2.95); IC 0.96 (0.51-1.40)].

Conclusion

Pharmacovigilance research on the FAERS has revealed a slight increase in reports of GI ulceration, haemorrhage, and obstruction in capecitabine users, which may cause serious or deadly consequences. In addition to the adverse reactions described in the package insert, close attention should be paid to GI obstruction to avoid discontinuation or life-threatening outcomes.

Capecitabine-induced severe adverse events-therapeutic drug monitoring and DPYD-gene analysis are recommended

In this report, two cases of patients with severe adverse events after an adjuvant treatment with capecitabine are described in detail. The first patient suffered from a severe ileocolitis, where ultimately intensive care treatment, total colectomy and ileum resection was necessary. The second patient experienced a toxic enteritis, which could be managed conservatively. Post-therapeutic DPYD genotyping was negative in the former and positive in the latter case. Patients can be categorised in normal, moderate and poor DPYD metabolisers to predict the risk of adverse events of capecitabine treatment. Guidelines in various European countries recommend pretherapeutic DPYD genotyping, whereas it is not recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network in the USA. Irrespective of DPYD genotyping, strict therapeutic drug monitoring is highly recommended to reduce the incidence and severity of adverse events.

Capecitabine-induced Gastrointestinal Injury Shows a Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD)-like Pattern

Capecitabine is a commonly used oral chemotherapeutic agent. Gastrointestinal (GI) side effects are clinically well-known, however, the histopathologic changes have not been comprehensively studied. This study describes the largest case series (8 patients) characterizing the histopathology of capecitabine-induced GI injury. All patients were adults (median age: 64.5 y, range: 61 to 76 y) and there was gender parity. Patients were receiving treatment for malignancies of the colorectum (n=5), breast (n=1), pancreas (n=1), and appendix (n=1). All had GI symptoms, including 7 with diarrhea and abdominal pain and 1 with melena. Five of 8 (63%) showed graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-like histologic changes in small intestinal and/or colonic biopsies characterized by crypt disarray and dropout, crypt atrophy, dilated crypts lined by attenuated epithelium, and increased crypt apoptosis. Neuroendocrine cell aggregates were present in 4 of 5 cases. Four of 5 showed patchy prominence in lamina propria eosinophils. One patient receiving concomitant radiation therapy had a small intestinal biopsy showing regenerative changes. Two patients had histologically unremarkable biopsies. On follow-up, capecitabine was discontinued or dose-reduced in all patients. Three of 5 patients with a GVHD-like pattern had clinical improvement, whereas 2 died shortly after biopsy. One with regenerative changes also had radiation dose reduction and improved clinically. Two with unremarkable biopsies improved symptomatically. In summary, capecitabine-related GI injury shows a GVHD-like pattern. Knowledge of this is important to confirm the diagnosis as patients typically improve with dose reduction or discontinuation of the drug.

Capecitabine-Induced Enterocolitis

Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate chemotherapy agent approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal and breast cancer. The common side effects associated with it include gastrointestinal (GI) upset, abdominal pain, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, fatigue, alopecia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and hyperbilirubinemia. Although GI symptoms are relatively common, enterocolitis is one of the rare side effects of this drug. We present a case of 53-year-old female who developed severe enterocolitis leading to ileus secondary to capecitabine chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. She was treated successfully via conservative management.