Interprofessional learning, impression management, and spontaneity in the acute healthcare setting

Communication of Code Status Escalation for Nurses and Physicians in the Intensive Care Unit: A Case Study

BACKGROUND

Interprofessional teams working in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) care for patients requiring varying degrees of life sustaining therapy. A patient's code status can help clinicians to understand the appropriate life support measures to deliver to patients in this setting. Members of the interprofessional team, such as physicians and nurses, can experience challenges related to communication when the code status is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore how nurses and physicians in the ICU experience communication of code status escalations.

METHODS

A qualitative case study approach was used. Participants were physicians and nurses, working in the medical-surgical ICU of a large, urban academic hospital. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews, observations of health care rounds and a chart review. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Thematic findings include: (1) engaging in an interprofessional discussion, (2) finding consistent documentation, (3) revisiting the code status, and (4) telling the patient story. The study findings also provide contextual information about participants' experiences of code status communication during the first wave (February 2020 to May 2020) of the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study could inform standard communication frameworks or practices related to dissemination of code status decisions among members of the ICU team.

The Impact of Pre-Round Meetings on the Clinical Learning of Nurses and Doctors on Hospital Wards: A Qualitative Study

Introduction

The pre-round meeting is an interprofessional gathering conducted in conjunction with the ward round in many hospitals. Here, nurses, doctors and eventually allied health clinicians discuss clinical issues before attending to the patients. This study focused on the learning aspects of the pre-round meeting, and it is, to our knowledge, the first study to explore the impact of pre-round meetings on learning in a clinical setting.

Objectives

To improve our understanding of the impact pre-round meetings has on clinical learning among the nurses and doctors who attend them.

Method

A qualitative study. Focus group interviews were conducted. Participants comprised of 9 doctors and 13 nurses from two different hospitals in Norway. The participants represented both surgical and non-surgical departments

Results

This study showed that the pre-round meeting is an arena with a high learning potential. Learning takes place in the discussion that arises when different professions meet. Both nurses and doctors emphasized that the pre-round meeting is both a conscious learning arena and an arena where learning is a by-product. Several factors interfered with the utilization of its learning potential.

Conclusion

The pre-round meeting is an arena with high learning potential. However various factors can influence this potential. The study highlights the importance of being aware of the learning potential in the pre-round meeting, to achieve higher-level learning objectives. A collaborative environment, continuity, competence, and availability of the staff and structured pre-round meetings are essential elements for achieving higher-level learning objectives.

Supervisors' pedagogies for supporting interns to learn intra- and interprofessional collaboration: a qualitative and quantitative ego network analysis

This work aims to understand intra- and interprofessional networks of general practitioners (GPs) and ear, nose, and throat specialists (ENT specialists), and in what manner supervisors in these specialties involve interns in their professional network to help them learn intra- and interprofessional collaboration. An egocentric social network approach was used to collect and analyze quantitative as well as qualitative data. For this, semi-structured interviews were held with ten GP and ten ENT specialists. GPs had significantly more interprofessional contacts than ENT specialists (p < .01), with no significant difference in the network sizes of both professions (p = .37). All supervisors involved interns in their (ego)network actively as well as more passively. They actively discussed how collaboration with other professionals evolved, or passively assumed that an intern would learn from observing the supervisors' network interactions. Many supervisors considered the interns' initiative essential in deciding to involve an intern in their network. Although the workplace of GPs differed notably from hospital settings where ENT specialists work, the network sizes of both were comparable. Clerkships at the general practice seemed to provide more opportunities to learn interprofessional collaboration, for example with the medical nurse. Supervisors in both specialties could involve interns more actively in their intra- and interprofessional network while interns could take more initiative to learn collaboration from their supervisors' network.

Nursing profession and nurses' contribution to nursing education as seen through students' eyes: A qualitative study

The behavior of clinical instructors, as observed by students, deeply influences their professional development. When instructors behave unprofessionally, they risk undermining the professional growth students gain from their clinical placement experience. Clinical instructors need to be aware of how their behavior can affect the students' learning process and the contributions they make to clinical nursing education. A qualitative study was performed to describe the nursing profession as perceived by students who observed their clinical instructors' behaviors during the clinical experience. In-depth interviews of nursing students were conducted until data saturation was attained. Sixteen interviews were analyzed using an inductive content analysis methodology. The nursing profession was described by the participants through five themes as follows: the helping relationship, technical role, professional growth, working group, and contradictions and conflicts. Several examples of unprofessional behaviors on the part of the clinical instructors were reported by the respondents. The nursing profession, as perceived by nursing students, does not always reflect their expectations and their ideas related to professionalism. Universities and schools of nursing should ascertain that clinical instructors are prepared to educate students. Faculty should clearly state to students what they can expect from the clinical experience, namely, preparing students to face real working environments that do not always reflect educational philosophies.