Considerations for single- versus multiple-drug pharmacotherapy in the management of painful diabetic neuropathy

Monotherapy Versus Combination Therapy in the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Painful peripheral neuropathy is a common and challenging complication of diabetes mellitus. Combination therapy is used widely by clinicians, although strong evidence for efficacy and safety is lacking. The goal of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of combination versus monotherapy of first-line medications for peripheral diabetic neuropathy.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched on December 5, 2022, for randomized clinical trials comparing combined therapy with gabapentinoids and either tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) versus monotherapy with any of these drugs. Pooled mean differences (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed for pain outcomes, measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale averaging pain scores in the last 7 days. Risk ratios (RRs) were computed for binary endpoints. Risk assessment was performed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool.

RESULTS

A total of five randomized studies and 916 patients were included. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 12 weeks. Mean pain reduction was greater for combination therapy than monotherapy (MD - 0.39; 95% CI - 0.67 to - 0.12; p = 0.005). Similarly, there was an improvement in ≥ 30% reduction in average pain (RR 1.16; 95% CI 1.07-1.26; p < 0.01) with combination therapy. In contrast, there was no significant difference between groups in ≥ 50% reduction in average pain (RR 1.21; 95% CI 0.99-1.49; p = 0.06). When comparing combination therapy versus gabapentinoid monotherapy, there was also a significant reduction in average pain (MD - 0.61; 95% CI - 0.85 to - 0.37; p < 0.01) with combination therapy.

CONCLUSION

In patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, the combination of gabapentinoids with TCAs or SNRIs is associated with a greater reduction in pain as compared with monotherapy, although this difference may not translate into a clinically important difference.

A Brief Review on the Novel Therapies for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Almost half of people diagnosed with diabetes mellitus will develop painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN), a condition greatly impacting quality of life with complicated pathology. While there are different FDA approved forms of treatment, many of the existing options are difficult to manage with comorbities and are associated with unwanted side effects. Here, we summarize the current and novel treatments for PDN.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current research is exploring alternative pain management treatments from the first line options of pregabalin, gabapentin, duloxetine, and amitriptyline which often have side effects. The use of FDA approved capsaicin and spinal cord stimulators (SCS) has been incredibly beneficial in addressing this. In addition, new treatments looking at different targets, such as NMDA receptor and the endocannabinoid system, show promising results. There are several treatment options that have been shown to be successful in helping treat PDN, but often require adjunct treatment or alterations due to side effects. While there is ample research for standard medications, treatments such as palmitoylethanolamide and endocannabinoid targets have extremely limited clinical trials. We also found that many studies did not evaluate additional variables other than pain relief, such as functional changes nor were there consistent measurement methods. Future research should continue trials comparing treatment efficacies along with more quality of life measures.

Morbidity and mortality of patients with diabetic neuropathy treated with pathogenetically oriented alpha-lipoic acid versus symptomatic pharmacotherapies - a nationwide database analysis from Hungary

AIMS

Diabetic neuropathy is associated with increased risk of morbidity and all-cause mortality. It is unclear whether these outcomes differ in patients with diabetic neuropathy treated with pathogenetically oriented vs symptomatic pharmacotherapies.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective (2009-2019) database analysis of patients treated with pathogenetically oriented alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) or symptomatic pharmacotherapies for diabetic neuropathy. We investigated clinical outcomes in propensity score matched patients in Hungary. Changes in hazard ratios and annualized event rates were assessed and sensitivity analyses performed.

RESULTS

Hazard ratios favored treatment with ALA vs symptomatic pharmacotherapies regarding acute myocardial infarction (HR 0.73, 95%CI: 0.60-0.89, p = 0.0016), stroke (HR 0.71, 95%CI: 0.62-0.82, p<0.0001), hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.72, 95%CI: 0.66-0.78, p<0.0001), cancer events (HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76-0.92, p = 0.0002) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.49-0.61, p<0.0001), but not for lower limb amputation (HR 1.05, 95%CI: 0.89-1.25, p = 0.5455). This association was supported by results of evaluating annual event rates and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective database analysis revealed a lower occurrence of cardio- and cerebrovascular morbidity, cancer events and all-cause mortality in patients with diabetic neuropathy treated with pathogenetically oriented ALA vs symptomatic pharmacotherapies. This hypothesis-generating result requires further investigations.

Comparative assessment of blood glucose monitoring techniques: a review

Monitoring blood glucose levels is a vital indicator of diabetes mellitus management. The mainstream techniques of glucometers are invasive, painful, expensive, intermittent, and time-consuming. The ever-increasing number of global diabetic patients urges the development of alternative non-invasive glucose monitoring techniques. Recent advances in electrochemical biosensors, biomaterials, wearable sensors, biomedical signal processing, and microfabrication technologies have led to significant research and ideas in elevating the patient's life quality. This review provides up-to-date information about the available technologies and compares the advantages and limitations of invasive and non-invasive monitoring techniques. The scope of measuring glucose concentration in other bio-fluids such as interstitial fluid (ISF), tears, saliva, and sweat are also discussed. The high accuracy level of invasive methods in measuring blood glucose concentrations gives them superiority over other methods due to lower average absolute error between the detected glucose concentration and reference values. Whereas minimally invasive, and non-invasive techniques have the advantages of continuous and pain-free monitoring. Various blood glucose monitoring techniques have been evaluated based on their correlation to blood, patient-friendly, time efficiency, cost efficiency, and accuracy. Finally, this review also compares the currently available glucose monitoring devices in the market.

A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of the pharmacotherapeutic options for painful diabetic neuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a high incidence and severe complication of diabetes mellitus, significantly compromising patients' quality of life and causing tremendous economic burden. Considering drug costs becomes part of treatment decisions, with the growing choice of monotherapy or combination treatment strategies for PDN treatment.

AREAS COVERED

This systematic review aims to identify the cost-effectiveness of pharmacotherapies in PDN, summarize key findings, and assess the quality of studies to inform healthcare resource allocation decisions and future research. Economic evaluations were identified by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and health technology assessment (HTA) databases, as well as screening reference lists of previously identified studies. Relevant data was extracted, and the CHEERS checklist was used to assess the quality of the studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Collectively, the findings indicate that more pharmacoeconomics research is urgently needed to directly compare high-quality research for PDN combination medication/sequential treatment, and which is performed from a societal perspective. Simultaneously, to strengthen the reliability of the analysis, metrics such as adherence, incidence of adverse drug reactions, and pain levels utility value should be examined to verify the robustness of the basic results.