1
|
ChiGan M, Chen M, Jing M. Designs of Upper Limb Tremor Suppression Orthoses: Efficacy and Wearer's Comfort. J Med Device 2025; 19:020801. [PMID: 39845265 PMCID: PMC11748961 DOI: 10.1115/1.4066968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2024] [Revised: 09/25/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2025] Open
Abstract
Tremor is a rhythmic, involuntary oscillatory movement that severely affects some aspects of a patient's daily life. The use of wearable tremor-suppressing orthoses has become an effective, noninvasive treatment method for controlling tremors. This article summarizes recent developments in upper limb tremor suppression orthoses, aiming to provide a foundation for future research. By analyzing the working mechanisms, degrees-of-freedom (DOFs), weight, and tremor suppression effectiveness of various types of orthoses, the following conclusions are drawn: We found that differences in the working mechanism and the number of suppression directions are related to the weight of the device; weight, in turn, is a major factor affecting the comfort of the orthoses; and the combination of the number and weight of the damping direction affects the effect of the damping equipment. Balancing these three factors should be a key focus of future research. Moreover, researchers are placing greater emphasis on the comfort of the wearer during the development of these orthoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MoYan ChiGan
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong 723000, China
| | - Manlong Chen
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong 723000, China
| | - Min Jing
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong 723000, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shih LC. Emerging Deep Brain Stimulation Targets in the Cerebellum for Tremor. CEREBELLUM (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2025; 24:38. [PMID: 39869292 DOI: 10.1007/s12311-025-01789-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/10/2025] [Indexed: 01/28/2025]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor is remarkably effective, leading to over 80% reduction in standardized tremor ratings. However, for certain types of tremor, such as those accompanied by ataxia or dystonia, conventional DBS targets have shown poor efficacy. Various rationales for using cerebellar DBS stimulation to treat tremor have been advanced, but the varied approaches leave many questions unanswered: which anatomic target, stimulation settings, and indications seem most promising for this emerging approach. This article reviews the clinical experience published to date and explores some of the pre-clinical and human physiology data that might support a role for further systematic investigation of cerebellar DBS for clinical use. Four tremor disorders to date have been targeted with cerebellar DBS in humans: essential tremor, post-stroke tremor, dystonic tremor, and tremor associated with degenerative cerebellar ataxias, like spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. The dentate nucleus is the most frequently chosen target, but key stereotactic and imaging details are missing from many of the case reports. Interestingly, consensus on laterality has not been definitively established as there are conflicting models of the hypothesized mechanism of action of DBS of the dentate nuclei, and conflicting reports of benefit on the tremor ipsilateral to and contralateral toto the affected limb. Several points are highlighted, including the prediction from in vivo preclinical physiology studies and interventional studies, the remaining uncertainty regarding the preferred laterality of targets, and the lack of clear prioritization of tremor etiologies to be targeted in future rigorously designed interventional studies (e.g., preferably repeated n-of-1 or sham-controlled studies involving more than one patient).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ludy C Shih
- Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mugge W, Elstgeest LEM, van Ginkel M, Pol L, de Lange IJ, Pambakian N, Assis de Souza A, Helmich RC, Kamphuis DJ. Essential Tremor Suppression with a Novel Anti-Tremor Orthosis: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Mov Disord 2025. [PMID: 39838596 DOI: 10.1002/mds.30082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2024] [Revised: 11/16/2024] [Accepted: 11/20/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Essential tremor (ET) is characterized by action tremor of the arms, which can interfere substantially with daily activities. Pharmacotherapy may be ineffective or associated with side effects, and stereotactic surgery is invasive. Hence, new accessible treatment options are urgently needed. An easy-to-use and lightweight orthotic device that exerts joint damping may provide an alternative solution for reducing tremor in daily activities. OBJECTIVE Our goal was to assess the efficacy of a novel anti-tremor orthosis (STIL) in reducing clinical and accelerometry measures of distal arm tremor in ET. METHODS In a randomized crossover single-blinded trial in 24 ET patients in a hospital setting, we compared three conditions: no orthosis (baseline), a sham device, and the anti-tremor orthosis (order randomized). The orthosis, but not the sham device, passively damped joints in the forearm. Participants performed seven tasks from the Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Scale (TETRAS). The two co-primary outcome measures were: clinical tremor severity (video-scored TETRAS) and tremor power (accelerometry). Patient satisfaction was self-assessed using the Dutch Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology. Conditions were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS The anti-tremor orthosis significantly reduced TETRAS scores compared to sham and baseline (baseline: 19.0 ± 3.2, sham: 13.7 ± 3.9, orthosis: 9.9 ± 3.6; mean ± standard deviation). Similar effects were observed for tremor power, which was reduced by 87.4% (orthosis vs. baseline) and 59.5% (orthosis vs. sham) across all tasks. A total of 71% of participants were (very) satisfied and 12.5% reported minor adverse events (discomfort/redness of skin). CONCLUSION The anti-tremor orthosis had a clinically relevant tremor-reducing effect in ET in a controlled setting, offering potential for a new treatment to manage ET in daily activities. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winfred Mugge
- Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Milan van Ginkel
- Department of Neurology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Lucas Pol
- Department of Neurology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - IJsbrand de Lange
- Department of Research and Development, STIL B.V, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Nicola Pambakian
- Department of Research and Development, STIL B.V, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rick C Helmich
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson and Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Daan J Kamphuis
- Department of Neurology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang J, Yan R, Cui Y, Su D, Feng T. Treatment for essential tremor: a systematic review and Bayesian Model-based Network Meta-analysis of RCTs. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 77:102889. [PMID: 39498461 PMCID: PMC11533039 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2024] [Revised: 10/01/2024] [Accepted: 10/03/2024] [Indexed: 11/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Essential tremor (ET) significantly impacts patients' daily lives and quality of life, presenting a considerable challenge in clinical practice. In recent years, novel therapeutic regimens have been investigated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This study aims to investigate and evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of various therapeutic interventions for ET. Methods We did a systematic review and Bayesian Model-based Network Meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs. Following PRISMA-NMA guidelines, a comprehensive database search was conducted up to April 1, 2024 to identify RCTs focused on ET treatments. The Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method was utilized for the analysis, evaluating the relative efficacy and safety of treatments using standardized mean difference (SMD) and log odds ratios (log ORs), respectively. Additionally, the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) was applied to assess the relative efficacy of the treatment modalities. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023415752. Findings This study included 33 RCTs involving 1251 patients, covering 19 oral medication treatments and six non-oral medication treatments. NMA showed that deep brain stimulation (DBS) (SMD = -4.93; 95% CI: [-7.73, -2.13]), CX-8998 (SMD = -2.69; 95% CI: [-5.26, -0.14]), atenolol (SMD = -2.36; 95% CI: [-4.70, -0.10]), and propranolol (SMD = -1.59; 95% CI: [-2.25, -0.67]) showed relative efficacy compared to placebo, with DBS demonstrating relative efficacy compared to 15 other treatment methods. However, GRADE assessment indicated that the evidence level for these conclusions was "low" or "very low." According to SUCRA rankings, DBS (0.97) ranked first in relative efficacy, followed by CX-8998 (0.80), thalamotomy (0.79), atenolol (0.76), metoprolol (0.66), propranolol (0.64), magnetic resonance guided focus ultrasound (MR-FUS) (0.624), ICI-118551 (0.620), nimodipine (0.61) and phenobarbitone (0.59). In terms of safety, as a network graph could not be constructed, DBS and thalamotomy were excluded from the NMA, while other effective treatments showed no significant differences in safety compared to placebo. Interpretation Our study results indicate that CX-8998, propranolol, and atenolol demonstrate relative efficacy and safety in treating ET. DBS is effective for medication-resistant ET and ranks first in relative efficacy, though our NMA lacks safety data for DBS. Given the low overall grade of evidence, these results should be applied cautiously in clinical practice. Further large-scale, head-to-head RCTs are needed. Funding This work was supported by grants from the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82271459).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junjiao Zhang
- Center for movement disorders, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Rui Yan
- Center for movement disorders, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yusha Cui
- Center for movement disorders, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Dongning Su
- Center for movement disorders, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Feng
- Center for movement disorders, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang L, Cui S, Xi X, Bi H, Huang B. Research hotspots and frontiers of essential tremor from 2013 to 2023: a visualization analysis based on CiteSpace. Front Aging Neurosci 2024; 16:1380851. [PMID: 39109267 PMCID: PMC11300259 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1380851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND ET, one of the most prevalent neurological disorders, presents a significant challenge in terms of disability. Despite the growing focus on ET in recent years, comprehensive bibliometric analysis has been lacking. METHODS This study delves into essential tremor research covering the period from 2013 to 2023, utilizing the Web of Science (WOS) database. Employing CiteSpace for quantitative analysis, it examines an array of metrics including annual publication trends, contributions from countries and institutions, authorship patterns, key terminologies, and patterns of reference co-citation. The primary objective is to use CiteSpace for a detailed visual exploration of the literature over the last decade, pinpointing the evolving landscape and key areas of focus in essential tremor research, and thus providing a foundation for future investigative endeavors. RESULTS There were 2,224 literary works included in all. The amount of published works has been steadily rising in recent years. Of them, the majority originate from the United States, Louis, Elan D. is the publisher of the most publications (161 articles), and Movement Disorders is the journal that receives the most citations. The key words contribution and co-cited literatures suggest that the main research hotspots in recent years are the physiological and pathological mechanism of essential tremor, the determination of optimal targets for deep brain stimulation (DBS) and surgery transcranial magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) in the surgical management of essential tremor and the innovative research of botulinum toxin administration method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linlin Zhang
- Nantong Fourth People’s Hospital, Nantong, China
| | - Shifang Cui
- Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China
| | - Xiaoming Xi
- Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hongyan Bi
- Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Bin Huang
- Nantong Fourth People’s Hospital, Nantong, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bilski M, Szklener K, Szklener S, Rudzińska A, Kluz N, Klas J, Rodzajewska A, Kuryło W, Korga M, Baranowska I, Mańdziuk S. Stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of essential tremor - a systematic review. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1370091. [PMID: 38633530 PMCID: PMC11021759 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1370091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Essential tremor (ET) is the most common movement disorder in adults, with an estimated incidence of up to 1% of the population and 5% of people older than 65 years of age. ET is manifested primarily by bilateral postural and kinetic tremor of the upper limbs with or without neurological symptoms and cognitive deficits. ET disrupts daily tasks and significantly lowers quality of life. Currently available medications alone are often insufficient to control severe symptoms. Several surgical treatment options are available, including stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)-a minimally invasive treatment option aimed at relieving and controlling tremors. Methods We conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature on the use of SRS in the treatment of ET using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials.gov registry and adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Results The results obtained confirm the high efficacy and safety of the SRS procedure in treating drug-resistant intention tremor. The study results present high response rate reaching 80% and achievement of manual task improvement, lessening of the tremor and increase in the quality of life of the majority of the operated patients. The method also stands out for its favorable balance between efficiency and cost. Disscusion Stereotactic radiosurgery is a favourable, safe, efficient and cost-effective method in treatment of the essential tremor. Ongoing research is crucial to refine patient selection criteria for this procedure and further improve the effectiveness of the technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mateusz Bilski
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
- Brachytherapy Department, Saint John’s Cancer Center, Lublin, Poland
- Radiotherapy Department, Saint John’s Cancer Center, Lublin, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Szklener
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | | | - Anna Rudzińska
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Natalia Kluz
- Student Scientific Circle at the Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Jakub Klas
- Student Scientific Circle at the Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Anna Rodzajewska
- Student Scientific Circle at the Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Weronika Kuryło
- Student Scientific Circle at the Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Mateusz Korga
- Student Scientific Circle at the Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Izabela Baranowska
- Department of Medical Physics, Saint John’s Cancer Center, Lublin, Poland
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Sławomir Mańdziuk
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Neudorfer C, Kultas-Ilinsky K, Ilinsky I, Paschen S, Helmers AK, Cosgrove GR, Richardson RM, Horn A, Deuschl G. The role of the motor thalamus in deep brain stimulation for essential tremor. Neurotherapeutics 2024; 21:e00313. [PMID: 38195310 PMCID: PMC11103222 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurot.2023.e00313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
The advent of next-generation technology has significantly advanced the implementation and delivery of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Essential Tremor (ET), yet controversies persist regarding optimal targets and networks responsible for tremor genesis and suppression. This review consolidates key insights from anatomy, neurology, electrophysiology, and radiology to summarize the current state-of-the-art in DBS for ET. We explore the role of the thalamus in motor function and describe how differences in parcellations and nomenclature have shaped our understanding of the neuroanatomical substrates associated with optimal outcomes. Subsequently, we discuss how seminal studies have propagated the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim)-centric view of DBS effects and shaped the ongoing debate over thalamic DBS versus stimulation in the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) in ET. We then describe probabilistic- and network-mapping studies instrumental in identifying the local and network substrates subserving tremor control, which suggest that the PSA is the optimal DBS target for tremor suppression in ET. Taken together, DBS offers promising outcomes for ET, with the PSA emerging as a better target for suppression of tremor symptoms. While advanced imaging techniques have substantially improved the identification of anatomical targets within this region, uncertainties persist regarding the distinct anatomical substrates involved in optimal tremor control. Inconsistent subdivisions and nomenclature of motor areas and other subdivisions in the thalamus further obfuscate the interpretation of stimulation results. While loss of benefit and habituation to DBS remain challenging in some patients, refined DBS techniques and closed-loop paradigms may eventually overcome these limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clemens Neudorfer
- Brain Modulation Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics Department of Neurology Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | - Igor Ilinsky
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Steffen Paschen
- Department of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - G Rees Cosgrove
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - R Mark Richardson
- Brain Modulation Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andreas Horn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics Department of Neurology Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Günther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Glowinsky S, Bergman H, Zarchi O, Fireman S, Reiner J, Tamir I. Electrophysiology-aided DBS targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus in an essential tremor patient with MRI-incompatible lead: A case report. Physiol Rep 2023; 11:e15730. [PMID: 37786936 PMCID: PMC10546088 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.15730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Essential tremor (ET) is a common disease in the elderly population. Severe, medication-refractory ET may require surgical intervention via ablation or deep brain stimulation (DBS). Thalamic Vim (Ventral intermediate nucleus), targeted indirectly using atlas-based coordinates, is the classical target in these procedures. We present a case of an ET patient with a non-MR-compatible cardiac orphaned leads who was a candidate for DBS surgery. Due to the lead constraints of MR use, we used a head computed tomography (CT) with contrast media as the reference exam to define the AC, PC, and midline, and to register and indirectly target the Vim. For target validation, we used intraoperative electrophysiological recordings and intraoperative CT. We implanted bilateral directional leads at the target location. We used the-essential-tremor-rating-assessment-scale (TETRAS) pre and postoperatively to clinically evaluate tremor. Intraoperative micro-electrode recordings (MERs) showed individual tremor cells and a robust increase in normalized root mean square (NRMS) indicating entry to the Vim. Postoperative visualization using lead-DBS along with dramatic clinical improvements show that we were able to accurately target the Vim. Our results show that CT-only registration and planning for thalamic Vim DBS is feasible, and that MERs and intraoperative CT are useful adjuncts for Vim target validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Glowinsky
- The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain SciencesHebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael
| | - Hagai Bergman
- The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain SciencesHebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael
- Department of Medical NeurobiologyHebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael
- Department of NeurosurgeryHadassah Medical Center, Hebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael
| | - Omer Zarchi
- Intraoperative Neurophysiology UnitRabin Medical Center, Beilinson HospitalPetach TikvahIsrael
| | - Shlomo Fireman
- Department of AnesthesiologyRabin Medical Center, Beilinson HospitalPetach TikvahIsrael
| | - Johnathan Reiner
- Department of NeurologyRabin Medical Center, Beilinson HospitalPetach TikvahIsrael
| | - Idit Tamir
- Department of NeurosurgeryRabin Medical Center, Beilinson HospitalPetach TikvahIsrael
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kondapavulur S, Silva AB, Molinaro AM, Wang DD. A Systematic Review Comparing Focused Ultrasound Surgery With Radiosurgery for Essential Tremor. Neurosurgery 2023; 93:524-538. [PMID: 37010324 PMCID: PMC10553193 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Focused ultrasound (FUS-T) and stereotactic radiosurgery thalamotomy (SRS-T) targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus are effective incisionless surgeries for essential tremor (ET). However, their efficacy for tremor reduction and, importantly, adverse event incidence have not been directly compared. OBJECTIVE To present a comprehensive systematic review with network meta-analysis examining both efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of FUS-T vs SRS-T for treating medically refractory ET. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, using the PubMed and Embase databases. We included all primary FUS-T/SRS-T studies with approximately 1-year follow-up, with unilateral Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale or Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor scores prethalamotomy/post-thalamotomy and/or AEs. The primary efficacy outcome was Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale A+B score reduction. AEs were reported as an estimated incidence. RESULTS Fifteen studies of 464 patients and 3 studies of 62 patients met inclusion criteria for FUS-T/SRS-T efficacy comparison, respectively. Network meta-analysis demonstrated similar tremor reduction between modalities (absolute tremor reduction: FUS-T: -11.6 (95% CI: -13.3, -9.9); SRS-T: -10.3 (95% CI: -14.2, -6.0). FUS-T had a greater 1-year adverse event rate, particularly imbalance and gait disturbances (10.5%) and sensory disturbances (8.3%). Contralateral hemiparesis (2.7%) often accompanied by speech impairment (2.4%) were most common after SRS-T. There was no correlation between efficacy and lesion volume. CONCLUSION Our systematic review found similar efficacy between FUS-T and SRS-T for ET, with trend toward higher efficacy yet greater adverse event incidence with FUS-T. Smaller lesion volumes could mitigate FUS-T off-target effects for greater safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sravani Kondapavulur
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Alexander B. Silva
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Doris D. Wang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Paoli D, Mills R, Brechany U, Pavese N, Nicholson C. DBS in tremor with dystonia: VIM, GPi or both? A review of the literature and considerations from a single-center experience. J Neurol 2023; 270:2217-2229. [PMID: 36680569 PMCID: PMC10025201 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11569-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for dystonia and tremor. However, there is no consensus about the best surgical targeting strategy in patients with concomitant tremor and dystonia. Both the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) and the globus pallidus pars interna (GPi) have been proposed as targets. Few cases using them together in a double-target approach have also been reported. METHODS We reviewed the literature on this topic, summarizing results of different target choices. Additionally, we retrospectively report a case series of nine patients with sporadic dystonia and severe tremor treated with a double-target strategy at our center. Outcome measures were the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFM) and Eq-5d scale. RESULTS In published studies of patients with dystonia and tremor, VIM-DBS is highly effective on tremor but raise some concerns about dystonia's control, while GPi-DBS is more effective on dystonia but does not always relieve tremor. GPi + VIM-DBS shows good efficacy but is rarely reported and reserved for selected patients. In our patients, the double-target strategy obtained a significant and durable improvement in tremor, dystonia, and quality of life. Additionally, compared with a cohort of patients with tremor treated with VIM-DBS only, significantly lower frequency and intensity of VIM stimulation were required to control tremor. CONCLUSION Our findings and published evidence seem to support the double-targeting approach as a safe and effective option in selected patients with tremor-dominant dystonia. This strategy appears to provide a more extensive control of either dystonia or tremor and may have a potential for limiting stimulation-related side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Paoli
- Clinical Ageing Research Unit, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL, UK
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Ospedale Santa Chiara, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Russell Mills
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK
| | - Una Brechany
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK
| | - Nicola Pavese
- Clinical Ageing Research Unit, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL, UK.
- Newcastle Magnetic Resonance Centre and Positron Emission Tomography Centre - Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL, UK.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Claire Nicholson
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ray A, Biswas DA. Association of Diet With Essential Tremor: A Narrative Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e29168. [PMID: 36258958 PMCID: PMC9567235 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Essential tremor is a neurological disorder categorized by the rhythmic shaking of the upper limbs, lower limbs, neck, or head. The etiology of essential tremor is believed to be genetic variations, environmental factors, lifestyle, etc. Poor lifestyle and diet are important factors contributing to the onset of various disorders. Environment and lifestyle play a significant part in the dietary habits of an individual. Some diet components may probably be associated with the etiopathogenesis or progression of the essential tremor. Dietary habits may be a key influence on the commencement of tremors in healthy individuals. Typically, the diet of essential tremor patients is not supervised. It may also intensify the tremors in essential tremor patients. Association of the diet with the essential tremor can shed light on the root of tremor aggravating aspect and aid in diet modification in essential tremor patients. The aim of the review is to establish a relation between the diet with etiopathogenesis and the progression of essential tremor. The review includes studies providing information about essential tremor and correlating essential tremor with diet, lifestyle, environment, and genetic factors. Studies that did not provide a link to the association of essential tremor were excluded. The interpretation of the research indicated that genetic variations might be triggered due to enzymatic changes triggered by dietary patterns. Dietary components showed ambiguous, weak, strong, or no association. Essential tremor may be influenced by diet. Further research must be carried out on essential tremor patients in the nutritional domain. Physicians may monitor the diet of the essential tremor patients and record the progress of the disorder on its basis to manage the patients with essential tremor and provide better services.
Collapse
|
12
|
Deuschl G, Antonini A, Costa J, Śmiłowska K, Berg D, Corvol J, Fabbrini G, Ferreira J, Foltynie T, Mir P, Schrag A, Seppi K, Taba P, Ruzicka E, Selikhova M, Henschke N, Villanueva G, Moro E. European Academy of Neurology/Movement Disorder Society ‐ European Section guideline on the treatment of Parkinson's disease: I. Invasive therapies. Eur J Neurol 2022; 29:2580-2595. [DOI: 10.1111/ene.15386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Günther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology, UKSH‐Kiel Campus Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel Germany
| | - Angelo Antonini
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neuroscience University of Padua Padua Italy
| | - Joao Costa
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal
| | - Katarzyna Śmiłowska
- Department of Neurology, UKSH‐Kiel Campus Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel Germany
| | - Daniela Berg
- Department of Neurology, UKSH‐Kiel Campus Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel Germany
| | - Jean‐Christophe Corvol
- Institut du Cerveau–Paris Brain Institute Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hospital Department of Neurology, Centre d'Investigation Clinique Neurosciences Sorbonne Université Paris France
| | - Giovanni Fabbrini
- Department Human Neurosciences Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy
- Neuromed Rome Italy
| | - Joaquim Ferreira
- Faculdade de Medicina Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes Lisbon Portugal
- Campus Neurológico Torres Vedras Portugal
| | - Tom Foltynie
- Department of Clinical & Movement Neurosciences Institute of Neurology London UK
| | - Pablo Mir
- Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento Servicio de Neurología y Neurofisiología Clínica Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/Universidad de Sevilla Seville Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas Madrid Spain
- Departamento de Medicina Facultad de Medicina Universidad de Sevilla Seville Spain
| | - Annette Schrag
- Institute of Neurology, University Clinic London London UK
| | - Klaus Seppi
- Klinik f. Neurologie Medizinische Universität Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria
| | - Pille Taba
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Tartu Tartu Estonia
- Tartu University Hospital Tartu Estonia
| | - Evzen Ruzicka
- Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague Prague Czechia
| | - Marianna Selikhova
- Department of Neurology Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University Moscow Russia
| | | | | | - Elena Moro
- Division of Neurology, Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences Grenoble Alpes University Grenoble France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Deuschl G, Antonini A, Costa J, Śmiłowska K, Berg D, Corvol J, Fabbrini G, Ferreira J, Foltynie T, Mir P, Schrag A, Seppi K, Taba P, Ruzicka E, Selikhova M, Henschke N, Villanueva G, Moro E. European Academy of Neurology/Movement Disorder Society‐European Section Guideline on the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: I. Invasive Therapies. Mov Disord 2022; 37:1360-1374. [DOI: 10.1002/mds.29066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Günther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology, UKSH‐Kiel Campus Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel Germany
| | - Angelo Antonini
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neuroscience University of Padua Padua Italy
| | - Joao Costa
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal
| | - Katarzyna Śmiłowska
- Department of Neurology, UKSH‐Kiel Campus Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel Germany
| | - Daniela Berg
- Department of Neurology, UKSH‐Kiel Campus Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel Germany
| | - Jean‐Christophe Corvol
- Institut du Cerveau‐Paris Brain Institute, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hospital, Department of Neurology, Centre d'Investigation Clinique Neurosciences Sorbonne Université Paris France
| | - Giovanni Fabbrini
- Department Human Neurosciences Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy
- IRCCS Neuromed Rome Italy
| | - Joaquim Ferreira
- Faculdade de Medicina Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes Lisbon Portugal
- Campus Neurológico Torres Vedras Portugal
| | - Tom Foltynie
- Department of Clinical & Movement Neurosciences Institute of Neurology London UK
| | - Pablo Mir
- Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento Servicio de Neurología y Neurofisiología Clínica Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/Universidad de Sevilla Seville Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas Madrid Spain
- Departamento de Medicina Facultad de Medicina Universidad de Sevilla Seville Spain
| | - Annette Schrag
- Institute of Neurology, University Clinic London London UK
| | - Klaus Seppi
- Klinik f. Neurologie Medizinische Universität Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria
| | - Pille Taba
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Tartu Tartu Estonia
- Tartu University Hospital Tartu Estonia
| | - Evzen Ruzicka
- Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague Prague Czechia
| | | | | | | | - Elena Moro
- Division of Neurology, Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences Grenoble Alpes University Grenoble France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bolton TAW, Van De Ville D, Régis J, Witjas T, Girard N, Levivier M, Tuleasca C. Morphometric features of drug-resistant essential tremor and recovery after stereotactic radiosurgical thalamotomy. Netw Neurosci 2022; 6:850-869. [PMID: 36605417 PMCID: PMC9810368 DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Essential tremor (ET) is the most common movement disorder. Its neural underpinnings remain unclear. Here, we quantified structural covariance between cortical thickness (CT), surface area (SA), and mean curvature (MC) estimates in patients with ET before and 1 year after ventro-intermediate nucleus stereotactic radiosurgical thalamotomy, and contrasted the observed patterns with those from matched healthy controls. For SA, complex rearrangements within a network of motion-related brain areas characterized patients with ET. This was complemented by MC alterations revolving around the left middle temporal cortex and the disappearance of positive-valued covariance across both modalities in the right fusiform gyrus. Recovery following thalamotomy involved MC readjustments in frontal brain centers, the amygdala, and the insula, capturing nonmotor characteristics of the disease. The appearance of negative-valued CT covariance between the left parahippocampal gyrus and hippocampus was another recovery mechanism involving high-level visual areas. This was complemented by the appearance of negative-valued CT/MC covariance, and positive-valued SA/MC covariance, in the right inferior temporal cortex and bilateral fusiform gyrus. Our results demonstrate that different morphometric properties provide complementary information to understand ET, and that their statistical cross-dependences are also valuable. They pinpoint several anatomical features of the disease and highlight routes of recovery following thalamotomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A. W. Bolton
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland,Connectomics Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland,* Corresponding Author:
| | - Dimitri Van De Ville
- Institute of Bioengineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland,Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva (UNIGE), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jean Régis
- Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Unit, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Tatiana Witjas
- Neurology Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Nadine Girard
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Centre de Résonance Magnétique Biologique et Médicale, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Marc Levivier
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland,Faculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM), University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Constantin Tuleasca
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland,Faculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM), University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland,Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS 5), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Prakash P, Deuschl G, Ozinga S, Mitchell KT, Cheeran B, Larson PS, Merola A, Groppa S, Tomlinson T, Ostrem JL. Benefits and Risks of a Staged‐Bilateral VIM versus Unilateral VIM DBS for Essential Tremor. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2022; 9:775-784. [PMID: 35937489 PMCID: PMC9346253 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite over 30 years of clinical experience, high‐quality studies on the efficacy of bilateral versus unilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate (VIM) nucleus of the thalamus for medically refractory essential tremor (ET) remain limited. Objectives To compare benefits and risks of bilateral versus unilateral VIM DBS using the largest ET DBS clinical trial dataset available to date. Methods Participants from the US St. Jude/Abbott pivotal ET DBS trial who underwent staged‐bilateral VIM implantation constituted the primary cohort in this sub‐analysis. Their assessments “on” DBS at six months after second‐side VIM DBS implantation were compared to the assessments six months after unilateral implantation. Two control cohorts of participants with unilateral implantation only were also used for between‐group comparisons. Results The primary cohort consisted of n = 38 ET patients (22M/16F; age of 65.3 ± 9.5 years). The second side VIM‐DBS resulted in a 29.6% additional improvement in the total motor CRST score (P < 0.001), with a 64.1% CRST improvement in the contralateral side (P < 0.001). An added improvement was observed in the axial tremor score (21.4%, P = 0.005), and CRST part B (24.8%, P < 0.001) score. Rate of adverse events was slightly higher after bilateral stimulation. Conclusions In the largest ET DBS study to date, staged‐bilateral VIM DBS was a highly effective treatment for ET with bilateral implantation resulting in greater reduction in total motor tremor scores when compared to unilateral stimulation alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prarthana Prakash
- Department of Neurology, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Center University of California San Francisco CA United States
| | - Guenther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology, Universitatsklinikum Schleswig‐Holstein, Kiel Campus Christian Albrechts University Kiel Kiel Germany
| | - Sarah Ozinga
- Abbott, Clinical Research Department 6901 Preston Road Plano TX 75024 USA
| | | | - Binith Cheeran
- Abbott, Clinical Research Department 6901 Preston Road Plano TX 75024 USA
| | - Paul S. Larson
- Department of Neurosurgery University of Arizona Tuscon AZ
| | - Aristide Merola
- Department of Neurology, Madden Center for Parkinson Disease and other Movement Disorders Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus OH United States
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg‐University Mainz Mainz Germany
| | - Tucker Tomlinson
- Abbott, Clinical Research Department 6901 Preston Road Plano TX 75024 USA
| | - Jill L. Ostrem
- Department of Neurology, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Center University of California San Francisco CA United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Elble RJ, Ondo W. Tremor rating scales and laboratory tools for assessing tremor. J Neurol Sci 2022; 435:120202. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2022.120202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Revised: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
17
|
Pérez-Sánchez JR, Martínez-Álvarez R, Martínez Moreno NE, Torres Diaz C, Rey G, Pareés I, Del Barrio A A, Álvarez-Linera J, Kurtis MM. Gamma Knife® stereotactic radiosurgery as a treatment for essential and parkinsonian tremor: long-term experience. NEUROLOGÍA (ENGLISH EDITION) 2022; 38:188-196. [PMID: 35305964 DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2020.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Unilateral Gamma Knife™ stereotactic radiosurgery on the ventral-intermediate nucleus of the thalamus is a minimally invasive neurosurgical option for refractory tremor. We describe the experience of Gamma Knife™ thalamotomy (GKT) in patients with essential tremor (ET) and tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease (PD) at our specialised stereotactic neurosurgery unit. METHODS We reviewed the cases of patients treated with GKT between January 2014 and February 2018 with a minimum of 12 months' follow-up. We analysed clinical and demographic variables, indication, radiation dose, effectiveness (based on subscales of the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin [FTM] scale and the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [MDS-UPDRS] motor score), and adverse events. RESULTS Thirteen patients were registered, 6 with a diagnosis of tremor-dominant PD, four with refractory ET, and three with ET and PD. Median age was 78 years (range, 62-83), with seven patients aged over 75 years. Four patients were receiving anticoagulants and two had history of stroke. The maximum radiation dose administered was 130 Gy. Mean (standard deviation) follow-up duration was 30.0 (14.5) months. Significant tremor improvement was observed on the FTM subscales: 63.6% at 12 months and 63.5% at the end of follow-up; MDS-UPDRS tremor items showed improvements of 71.3% at 12 months and 60.3% at the end of follow up. Eleven patients reported significant improvements in quality of life, and 3 reported mild and transient adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest series of patients with essential and parkinsonian tremor treated with GKT and followed up in the long term in Spain. GKT can be safe and effective in the long term in patients with refractory tremor, including in elderly patients and those receiving anticoagulants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J R Pérez-Sánchez
- Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Martínez-Álvarez
- Servicio de Radiocirugía y Neurocirugía funcional, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain
| | - N E Martínez Moreno
- Servicio de Radiocirugía y Neurocirugía funcional, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Torres Diaz
- Servicio de Radiocirugía y Neurocirugía funcional, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - G Rey
- Servicio de Radiocirugía y Neurocirugía funcional, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Pareés
- Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Del Barrio A
- Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Álvarez-Linera
- Servicio de Radiología, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain
| | - M M Kurtis
- Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chen Y, Li Y, Du M, Yu J, Gao F, Yuan Z, Chen Z. Ultrasound Neuromodulation: Integrating Medicine and Engineering for Neurological Disease Treatment. BIO INTEGRATION 2021. [DOI: 10.15212/bioi-2020-0026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract Neurological diseases associated with dysfunctions of neural circuits, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), depression and epilepsy, have been increasingly prevalent. To tackle these issues, artificial stimulation or regulation of specific neural circuits and
nuclei are employed to alleviate or cure certain neurological diseases. In particular, ultrasound neuromodulation has been an emerging interdisciplinary approach, which integrates medicine and engineering methodologies in the treatment. With the development of medicine and engineering, ultrasound
neuromodulation has gradually been applied in the treatment of central nervous system diseases. In this review, we aimed to summarize the mechanism of ultrasound neuromodulation and the advances of focused ultrasound (FUS) in neuromodulation in recent years, with a special emphasis on its
application in central nervous system disease treatment. FUS showed great feasibility in the treatment of epilepsy, tremor, AD, depression, and brain trauma. We also suggested future directions of ultrasound neuromodulation in clinical settings, with a focus on its fusion with genetic engineering
or nanotechnology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuhao Chen
- Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Laboratory of Ultrasound Molecular Imaging, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510150, China
| | - Yue Li
- Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Laboratory of Ultrasound Molecular Imaging, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510150, China
| | - Meng Du
- Medical Imaging Centre, First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China
| | - Jinsui Yu
- Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Laboratory of Ultrasound Molecular Imaging, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510150, China
| | - Fei Gao
- Cancer Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macau SAR 999078, China
| | - Zhen Yuan
- Cancer Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macau SAR 999078, China
| | - Zhiyi Chen
- Medical Imaging Centre, First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kosmowska B, Wardas J. The Pathophysiology and Treatment of Essential Tremor: The Role of Adenosine and Dopamine Receptors in Animal Models. Biomolecules 2021; 11:1813. [PMID: 34944457 PMCID: PMC8698799 DOI: 10.3390/biom11121813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most common neurological disorders that often affects people in the prime of their lives, leading to a significant reduction in their quality of life, gradually making them unable to independently perform the simplest activities. Here we show that current ET pharmacotherapy often does not sufficiently alleviate disease symptoms and is completely ineffective in more than 30% of patients. At present, deep brain stimulation of the motor thalamus is the most effective ET treatment. However, like any brain surgery, it can cause many undesirable side effects; thus, it is only performed in patients with an advanced disease who are not responsive to drugs. Therefore, it seems extremely important to look for new strategies for treating ET. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on the pathomechanism of ET based on studies in animal models of the disease, as well as to present and discuss the results of research available to date on various substances affecting dopamine (mainly D3) or adenosine A1 receptors, which, due to their ability to modulate harmaline-induced tremor, may provide the basis for the development of new potential therapies for ET in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jadwiga Wardas
- Department of Neuropsychopharmacology, Maj Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-343 Kraków, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dhima K, Biars J, Kondylis E, Nagel S, Yu XX, Floden DP. Neuropsychological outcomes after thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2021; 92:88-93. [PMID: 34736157 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Non-motor DBS outcomes have received little attention in ET relative to PD. This study examines neuropsychological outcomes in ET following thalamic VIM DBS. METHODS Fifty patients completed neuropsychological evaluations preoperatively and approximately seven months postoperatively. Cognition and mood changes were analyzed at the group level and individual level. Additional associations with treatment, disease, and demographic characteristics were assessed. RESULTS Significant cognitive decline was not observed at the group level. At the individual level, 46% of patients demonstrated at least subtle overall cognitive decline (≥1SD on at least one test within at least two domains). Mild decline (≥1SD) was seen in 10%-29.17% of patients on individual tests across all cognitive domains, with highest rates in verbal memory. Substantial cognitive decline (≥2SD) occurred in less than 9% of the sample across all tests. Factors related to cognitive decline included higher DBS parameter settings, older age of ET onset, intracranial complications, and inability to reduce ET medications postoperatively. Depression and anxiety did not change when accounting for questionnaire items that could be falsely elevated by tremor. CONCLUSION Substantial cognitive decline after VIM DBS is rare in patients with ET. However, subtle decrements can occur across cognitive domains and particularly in verbal memory. DBS parameter settings may relate to cognitive decline. Further research is needed to better understand possible associations with electrode lateralization and other variables that could also relate to disease progression and test-retest effects. Symptoms of depression and anxiety remain stable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaltra Dhima
- Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Julia Biars
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Sean Nagel
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Xin Xin Yu
- Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Darlene P Floden
- Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Essential tremor amplitude modulation by median nerve stimulation. Sci Rep 2021; 11:17720. [PMID: 34489503 PMCID: PMC8421420 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96660-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Essential tremor is a common neurological disorder, characterised by involuntary shaking of a limb. Patients are usually treated using medications which have limited effects on tremor and may cause side-effects. Surgical therapies are effective in reducing essential tremor, however, the invasive nature of these therapies together with the high cost, greatly limit the number of patients benefiting from them. Non-invasive therapies have gained increasing traction to meet this clinical need. Here, we test a non-invasive and closed-loop electrical stimulation paradigm which tracks peripheral tremor and targets thalamic afferents to modulate the central oscillators underlying tremor. To this end, 9 patients had electrical stimulation delivered to the median nerve locked to different phases of tremor. Peripheral stimulation induced a subtle but significant modulation in five out of nine patients-this modulation consisted mainly of amplification rather than suppression of tremor amplitude. Modulatory effects of stimulation were more pronounced when patient's tremor was spontaneously weaker at stimulation onset, when significant modulation became more frequent amongst subjects. This data suggests that for selected individuals, a more sophisticated control policy entailing an online estimate of both tremor phase and amplitude, should be considered in further explorations of the treatment potential of tremor phase-locked peripheral stimulation.
Collapse
|
22
|
Akman Ö, Utkan T, Arıcıoğlu F, Güllü K, Ateş N, Karson A. Agmatine has beneficial effect on harmaline-induced essential tremor in rat. Neurosci Lett 2021; 753:135881. [PMID: 33838255 DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most prevalent movement disorders and the most common cause of abnormal tremors. However, it cannot be treated efficiently with the currently available pharmacotherapy options. The pathophysiology of harmaline-induced tremor, most commonly used model of ET, involves various neurotransmitter systems including glutamate as well as ion channels. Agmatine, an endogenous neuromodulator, interacts with various glutamate receptor subtypes and ion channels, which have been associated with its' beneficial effects on several neurological disorders. The current study aims to assess the effect of agmatine on the harmaline model of ET. Two separate groups of male rats were injected either with saline or agmatine (40 mg/kg) 30 min prior to single intraperitoneal injection of harmaline (20 mg/kg). The percent duration, intensity and frequency of tremor and locomotor activity were evaluated by a custom-built tremor and locomotion analysis system. Pretreatment with agmatine reduced the percent tremor duration and intensity of tremor induced by harmaline, without affecting the tremor frequency. However, it did not affect the decreased spontaneous locomotor activity due to harmaline. This pattern of ameliorating effects of agmatine on harmaline-induced tremor provide the first evidence for being considered as a treatment option for ET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Özlem Akman
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Demiroglu Bilim University, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Tijen Utkan
- Kocaeli University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Kocaeli, Turkey.
| | - Feyza Arıcıoğlu
- Marmara University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology and Psychopharmacology Research Unit, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Kemal Güllü
- Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, İzmir Bakircay University, İzmir, Turkey.
| | - Nurbay Ateş
- Kocaeli University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Kocaeli, Turkey.
| | - Ayşe Karson
- Kocaeli University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Kocaeli, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mo J, Priefer R. Medical Devices for Tremor Suppression: Current Status and Future Directions. BIOSENSORS-BASEL 2021; 11:bios11040099. [PMID: 33808056 PMCID: PMC8065649 DOI: 10.3390/bios11040099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Tremors are the most prevalent movement disorder that interferes with the patient’s daily living, and physical activities, ultimately leading to a reduced quality of life. Due to the pathophysiology of tremor, developing effective pharmacotherapies, which are only suboptimal in the management of tremor, has many challenges. Thus, a range of therapies are necessary in managing this progressive, aging-associated disorder. Surgical interventions such as deep brain stimulation are able to provide durable tremor control. However, due to high costs, patient and practitioner preference, and perceived high risks, their utilization is minimized. Medical devices are placed in a unique position to bridge this gap between lifestyle interventions, pharmacotherapies, and surgical treatments to provide safe and effective tremor suppression. Herein, we review the mechanisms of action, safety and efficacy profiles, and clinical applications of different medical devices that are currently available or have been previously investigated for tremor suppression. These devices are primarily noninvasive, which can be a beneficial addition to the patient’s existing pharmacotherapy and/or lifestyle intervention.
Collapse
|
24
|
Parameters for subthalamic deep brain stimulation in patients with dystonia: a systematic review. J Neurol 2021; 269:197-204. [PMID: 33385242 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-10372-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used for treating dystonia, commonly targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Optimal stimulation parameters are required to achieve satisfying results. However, recommended parameters for STN-DBS remain to be identified. In this review, we aimed to assess the optimal stimulation parameters by analyzing previously published STN-DBS data of patients with dystonia. METHODS We examined the STN-DBS stimulation parameters used in studies on dystonia selected on the PubMed/Medline database. RESULTS Of the 86 publications retrieved from the PubMed/Medline database, we included 24, which consisted of data from 94 patients and 160 electrodes. Overall, the following average stimulation parameters were observed: amplitude, 2.59 ± 0.67 V; pulse width, 83.87 ± 34.70 μs; frequency, 142.08 ± 37.81 Hz. The average improvement rate was 64.72 ± 24.74%. The improvement rate and stimulation parameters were linearly dependent. The average improvement rate increased by 3.58% at each 10-Hz increase in frequency. In focal and segmental dystonia, the improvement rate and stimulation parameters were linearly dependent. The improvement rate increased by 6.06% and decreased by 2.14% at each 10-Hz increase in frequency and pulse width, respectively. Seventeen publications (83 patients) mentioned stimulation-related adverse effects, including dyskinesia (17), depression (8), transient dysarthria (5), weight gain (4), transient dysphasia (3), transient paresthesia (2), and sustained hyperkinesia (2). CONCLUSIONS The optimal stimulation parameter for STN-DBS varies across patients. Our findings may be useful for DBS programming based on the specific dystonia subtypes, especially for patients with focal and segmental dystonia.
Collapse
|
25
|
Subramaniam S, Blake DT, Constantinidis C. Cholinergic Deep Brain Stimulation for Memory and Cognitive Disorders. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 83:491-503. [PMID: 34334401 PMCID: PMC8543284 DOI: 10.3233/jad-210425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Memory and cognitive impairment as sequelae of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease and age-related dementia are major health issues with increasing social and economic burden. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a potential treatment to slow or halt progression of the disease state. The selection of stimulation target is critical, and structures that have been targeted for memory and cognitive enhancement include the Papez circuit, structures projecting to the frontal lobe such as the ventral internal capsule, and the cholinergic forebrain. Recent human clinical and animal model results imply that DBS of the nucleus basalis of Meynert can induce a therapeutic modulation of neuronal activity. Benefits include enhanced activity across the cortical mantle, and potential for amelioration of neuropathological mechanisms associated with Alzheimer's disease. The choice of stimulation parameters is also critical. High-frequency, continuous stimulation is used for movement disorders as a way of inhibiting their output; however, no overexcitation has been hypothesized in Alzheimer's disease and lower stimulation frequency or intermittent patterns of stimulation (periods of stimulation interleaved with periods of no stimulation) are likely to be more effective for stimulation of the cholinergic forebrain. Efficacy and long-term tolerance in human patients remain open questions, though the cumulative experience gained by DBS for movement disorders provides assurance for the safety of the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saravanan Subramaniam
- Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - David T. Blake
- Brain and Behavior Discovery Institute, Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Christos Constantinidis
- Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Neuroscience Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Essential tremor is one of the most common tremor syndromes. According to the recent tremor classification, tremor as a symptom is defined as an involuntary, rhythmic, oscillatory movement of a body part and is classified along two axes: axis 1-defining syndromes based on the clinical features such as historical features, tremor characteristics, associated signs, and laboratory tests; and axis 2-classifying the etiology (Bhatia et al., Mov Disord 33:75-87, 2018). The management of this condition has two major approaches. The first is to exclude treatable etiologies, as particularly during the onset of this condition the presentation of a variety of etiologies can be with monosymptomatic tremor. Once the few etiologies with causal treatments are excluded, all further treatment is symptomatic. Shared decision-making with enabling the patient to knowledgeably choose treatment options is needed to customize the management. Mild to moderate tremor severity can sometimes be controlled with occupational treatment, speech therapy of psychotherapy, or adaptation of coping strategy. First-line pharmacological treatments include symptomatic treatment with propranolol, primidone, and topiramate. Botulinum toxin is for selected cases. Invasive treatments for essential tremor should be considered for severe tremors. They are generally accepted as the most powerful interventions and provide not only improvement of tremor but also a significant improvement of life quality. The current standard is deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamic and subthalamic region. Focused ultrasound thalamotomy is a new therapy attracting increasing interest. Radiofrequency lesioning is only rarely done if DBS or focused ultrasound is not possible. Radiosurgery is not well established. We present our treatment algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Hopfner
- Department of Neurology, UKSH, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Rosalind-Fraenklinstr. 10, 24105, Kiel, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Günther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology, UKSH, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Rosalind-Fraenklinstr. 10, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pérez-Sánchez JR, Martínez-Álvarez R, Martínez Moreno NE, Torres Diaz C, Rey G, Pareés I, Del Barrio A A, Álvarez-Linera J, Kurtis MM. Gamma Knife® stereotactic radiosurgery as a treatment for essential and parkinsonian tremor: long-term experience. Neurologia 2020; 38:S0213-4853(20)30217-6. [PMID: 32917436 DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2020.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2019] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Unilateral Gamma Knife™ stereotactic radiosurgery on the ventral-intermediate nucleus of the thalamus is a minimally invasive neurosurgical option for refractory tremor. We describe the experience of Gamma Knife™ thalamotomy (GKT) in patients with essential tremor (ET) and tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease (PD) at our specialised stereotactic neurosurgery unit. METHODS We reviewed the cases of patients treated with GKT between January 2014 and February 2018 with a minimum of 12 months' follow-up. We analysed clinical and demographic variables, indication, radiation dose, effectiveness (based on subscales of the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin [FTM] scale and the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [MDS-UPDRS] motor score), and adverse events. RESULTS Thirteen patients were registered, 6 with a diagnosis of tremor-dominant PD, four with refractory ET, and three with ET and PD. Median age was 78 years (range, 62-83), with seven patients aged over 75 years. Four patients were receiving anticoagulants and two had history of stroke. The maximum radiation dose administered was 130 Gy. Mean (standard deviation) follow-up duration was 30.0 (14.5) months. Significant tremor improvement was observed on the FTM subscales: 63.6% at 12 months and 63.5% at the end of follow-up; MDS-UPDRS tremor items showed improvements of 71.3% at 12 months and 60.3% at the end of follow up. Eleven patients reported significant improvements in quality of life, and 3 reported mild and transient adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest series of patients with essential and parkinsonian tremor treated with GKT and followed up in the long term in Spain. GKT can be safe and effective in the long term in patients with refractory tremor, including in elderly patients and those receiving anticoagulants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J R Pérez-Sánchez
- Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, España
| | - R Martínez-Álvarez
- Servicio de Radiocirugía y Neurocirugía funcional, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, España
| | - N E Martínez Moreno
- Servicio de Radiocirugía y Neurocirugía funcional, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, España
| | - C Torres Diaz
- Servicio de Radiocirugía y Neurocirugía funcional, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, España; Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, España
| | - G Rey
- Servicio de Radiocirugía y Neurocirugía funcional, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, España
| | - I Pareés
- Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, España
| | - A Del Barrio A
- Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, España
| | - J Álvarez-Linera
- Servicio de Radiología, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, España
| | - M M Kurtis
- Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, España.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zach H, Dirkx MF, Roth D, Pasman JW, Bloem BR, Helmich RC. Dopamine-responsive and dopamine-resistant resting tremor in Parkinson disease. Neurology 2020; 95:e1461-e1470. [PMID: 32651292 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000010316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We tested the hypothesis that there are 2 distinct phenotypes of Parkinson tremor, based on interindividual differences in the response of resting tremor to dopaminergic medication. We also investigated whether this pattern is specific to tremor by comparing interindividual differences in the dopamine response of tremor to that of bradykinesia. METHODS In this exploratory study, we performed a levodopa challenge in 76 tremulous patients with Parkinson tremor. Clinical scores (Movement Disorders Society-sponsored version of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III) were collected "off" and "on" a standardized dopaminergic challenge (200/50 mg dispersible levodopa-benserazide). In both sessions, resting tremor intensity was quantified using accelerometry, both during rest and during cognitive coactivation. Bradykinesia was quantified using a speeded keyboard test. We calculated the distribution of dopamine-responsiveness for resting tremor and bradykinesia. In 41 patients, a double-blinded, placebo-controlled dopaminergic challenge was repeated after approximately 6 months. RESULTS The dopamine response of resting tremor, but not bradykinesia, significantly departed from a normal distribution. A cluster analysis on 3 clinical and electrophysiologic markers of tremor dopamine-responsiveness revealed 3 clusters: dopamine-responsive, intermediate, and dopamine-resistant tremor. A repeated levodopa challenge after 6 months confirmed this classification. Patients with dopamine-responsive tremor had greater disease severity and tended to have a higher prevalence of dyskinesia. CONCLUSION Parkinson resting tremor can be divided into 3 partially overlapping phenotypes, based on the dopamine response. These tremor phenotypes may be associated with different underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms, requiring a different therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidemarie Zach
- From the Department of Neurology (H.Z., M.F.D., J.W.P., B.R.B., R.C.H.), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; and Departments of Neurology (H.Z.) and Emergency Medicine (D.R.), Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Michiel F Dirkx
- From the Department of Neurology (H.Z., M.F.D., J.W.P., B.R.B., R.C.H.), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; and Departments of Neurology (H.Z.) and Emergency Medicine (D.R.), Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Dominik Roth
- From the Department of Neurology (H.Z., M.F.D., J.W.P., B.R.B., R.C.H.), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; and Departments of Neurology (H.Z.) and Emergency Medicine (D.R.), Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Jaco W Pasman
- From the Department of Neurology (H.Z., M.F.D., J.W.P., B.R.B., R.C.H.), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; and Departments of Neurology (H.Z.) and Emergency Medicine (D.R.), Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Bastiaan R Bloem
- From the Department of Neurology (H.Z., M.F.D., J.W.P., B.R.B., R.C.H.), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; and Departments of Neurology (H.Z.) and Emergency Medicine (D.R.), Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Rick C Helmich
- From the Department of Neurology (H.Z., M.F.D., J.W.P., B.R.B., R.C.H.), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; and Departments of Neurology (H.Z.) and Emergency Medicine (D.R.), Medical University Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Oishi K, Mori S, Troncoso JC, Lenz FA. Mapping tracts in the human subthalamic area by 11.7T ex vivo diffusion tensor imaging. Brain Struct Funct 2020; 225:1293-1312. [PMID: 32303844 PMCID: PMC7584118 DOI: 10.1007/s00429-020-02066-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical feedback loops that consist of distinct white matter pathways are important for understanding in vivo imaging studies of functional and anatomical connectivity, and for localizing subthalamic white matter structures in surgical approaches for movement disorders, such as Parkinson's disease. Connectomic analysis in animals has identified fiber connections between the basal ganglia and thalamus, which pass through the fields of Forel, where other fiber pathways related to motor, sensory, and cognitive functions co-exist. We now report these pathways in the human brain on ex vivo mesoscopic (250 μm) diffusion tensor imaging and on tractography. The locations of the tracts were identified relative to the adjacent gray matter structures, such as the internal and external segments of the globus pallidus; the zona incerta; the subthalamic nucleus; the substantia nigra pars reticulata and compacta; and the thalamus. The connectome atlas of the human subthalamic region may serve as a resource for imaging studies and for neurosurgical planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenichi Oishi
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 208 Traylor Building, 720 Rutland Ave., Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
| | - Susumu Mori
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 208 Traylor Building, 720 Rutland Ave., Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Juan C Troncoso
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Frederick A Lenz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Meyer 8181 Neurosurgery, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kosmowska B, Ossowska K, Konieczny J, Lenda T, Berghauzen-Maciejewska K, Wardas J. Inhibition of Excessive Glutamatergic Transmission in the Ventral Thalamic Nuclei by a Selective Adenosine A1 Receptor Agonist, 5′-Chloro-5′-Deoxy-(±)-ENBA Underlies its Tremorolytic Effect in the Harmaline-Induced Model of Essential Tremor. Neuroscience 2020; 429:106-118. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.12.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
31
|
Halpern CH, Santini V, Lipsman N, Lozano AM, Schwartz ML, Shah BB, Elias WJ, Cosgrove GR, Hayes MT, McDannold N, Aldrich C, Eisenberg HM, Gandhi D, Taira T, Gwinn R, Ro S, Witt J, Jung NY, Chang JW, Rosenberg J, Ghanouni P. Three-year follow-up of prospective trial of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor. Neurology 2019; 93:e2284-e2293. [PMID: 31748250 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000008561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Accepted: 06/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that transcranial magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (tcMRgFUS) thalamotomy is effective, durable, and safe for patients with medication-refractory essential tremor (ET), we assessed clinical outcomes at 3-year follow-up of a controlled multicenter prospective trial. METHODS Outcomes were based on the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor, including hand combined tremor-motor (scale of 0-32), functional disability (scale of 0-32), and postural tremor (scale of 0-4) scores, and total scores from the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (scale of 0-100). Scores at 36 months were compared with baseline and at 6 months after treatment to assess for efficacy and durability. Adverse events were also reported. RESULTS Measured scores remained improved from baseline to 36 months (all p < 0.0001). Range of improvement from baseline was 38%-50% in hand tremor, 43%-56% in disability, 50%-75% in postural tremor, and 27%-42% in quality of life. When compared to scores at 6 months, median scores increased for hand tremor (95% confidence interval [CI] 0-2, p = 0.0098) and disability (95% CI 1-4, p = 0.0001). During the third follow-up year, all previously noted adverse events remained mild or moderate, none worsened, 2 resolved, and no new adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS Results at 3 years after unilateral tcMRgFUS thalamotomy for ET show continued benefit, and no progressive or delayed complications. Patients may experience mild degradation in some treatment metrics by 3 years, though improvement from baseline remains significant. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER NCT01827904. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with severe ET, unilateral tcMRgFUS thalamotomy provides durable benefit after 3 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey H Halpern
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Veronica Santini
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Nir Lipsman
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Andres M Lozano
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Michael L Schwartz
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Binit B Shah
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - W Jeff Elias
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Garth R Cosgrove
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Michael T Hayes
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Nathan McDannold
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Christina Aldrich
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Howard M Eisenberg
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dheeraj Gandhi
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Takaomi Taira
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ryder Gwinn
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Susie Ro
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jennifer Witt
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Na Young Jung
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Woo Chang
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jarrett Rosenberg
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Pejman Ghanouni
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (C.H.H.), Neurology (V.S.), and Radiology (J.R., P.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (N.L., A.M.L., M.L.S.), University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Neurology (B.B.S., W.J.E.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Departments of Neurosurgery (G.R.C.), Neurology (M.T.H.), and Radiology (N.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Departments of Neurosurgery (C.A., H.M.E.) and Radiology (D.G.), University of Maryland, Baltimore; Department of Neurosurgery (T.T.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.G.) and Neurology (S.R., J.W.), Swedish Hospital Seattle, WA; and Department of Neurosurgery (N.Y.J., J.W.C.), Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Elble RJ. Estimating Change in Tremor Amplitude Using Clinical Ratings: Recommendations for Clinical Trials. TREMOR AND OTHER HYPERKINETIC MOVEMENTS (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2019; 8:600. [PMID: 31637097 PMCID: PMC6802602 DOI: 10.7916/d89c8f3c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Tremor rating scales are the standard method for assessing tremor severity and clinical change due to treatment or disease progression. However, ratings and their changes are difficult to interpret without knowing the relationship between ratings and tremor amplitude (displacement or angular rotation), and the computation of percentage change in ratings relative to baseline is misleading because of the ordinal nature of these scales. For example, a reduction in tremor from rating 2 to rating 1 (0-4 scale) should not be interpreted as a 50% reduction in tremor amplitude, nor should a reduction in rating 4 to rating 3 be interpreted as a 25% reduction in tremor. Studies from several laboratories have found a logarithmic relationship between tremor ratings R and tremor amplitude T, measured with a motion transducer: logT = α·R + β, where α ≈ 0.5, β ≈ -2, and log is base 10. This relationship is consistent with the Weber-Fechner law of psychophysics, and from this equation, the fractional change in tremor amplitude for a given change in clinical ratings is derived: (Tf-Ti)/Ti=10α(Rf-(Ri)-1, where the subscripts i and f refer to the initial and final values. For a 0-4 scale and α = 0.5, a 1-point reduction in tremor ratings is roughly a 68% reduction in tremor amplitude, regardless of the baseline tremor rating (e.g., 2 or 4). Similarly, a 2-point reduction is roughly a 90% reduction in tremor amplitude. These Weber-Fechner equations should be used in clinical trials for computing and interpreting change in tremor, assessed with clinical ratings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodger J Elble
- Department of Neurology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA.,Yale University, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Berardelli I, Pasquini M, Conte A, Bologna M, Berardelli A, Fabbrini G. Treatment of psychiatric disturbances in common hyperkinetic movement disorders. Expert Rev Neurother 2018; 19:55-65. [DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2019.1555475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Berardelli
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Suicide Prevention Center, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Pasquini
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Conte
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- IRCCS Neuromed
| | - Matteo Bologna
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- IRCCS Neuromed
| | - Alfredo Berardelli
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- IRCCS Neuromed
| | - Giovanni Fabbrini
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- IRCCS Neuromed
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Niemann N, Jankovic J. Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Hand Tremor. Toxins (Basel) 2018; 10:E299. [PMID: 30029483 PMCID: PMC6070882 DOI: 10.3390/toxins10070299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 07/14/2018] [Accepted: 07/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study is to review our longitudinal experience with onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A) injections for medically refractory hand tremor. We performed a retrospective review of our database of patients treated with onaBoNT-A for hand tremor evaluated between 2010 and 2018 in at least 2 sessions with follow-up. The majority were injected into the forearm flexors (FF), although treatment was individualized. During the specified period, 91 patients (53 essential tremor, 31 dystonic tremor, 6 Parkinson's disease tremor, and 1 cerebellar outflow tremor) met our inclusion criteria. The mean age (SD) was 64.8 years (12.8), and mean duration of follow-up was 29.6 months (25.1) with mean of 7.7 (6.3) treatment visits. FF were injected in 89 (97.8%) patients, exclusively in 74 (81.3%), and 15 (16.5%) were injected in FF and other muscles. EMG guidance was used in 5 patients (5.5%). On a 0⁻4 "peak effect" rating scale (0 = no effect, 4 = marked improvement in severity and function), 80.2% and 85.7% of patients reported moderate or marked improvement (score 3 or 4) at their first and last follow-up visit, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the outcomes between first and last visit: average "peak effect" rating score (3.2 versus 3.4), "global" rating score (3.0 versus 3.2), latency of response (4.5 versus 3.8 days), and total duration of response (12.7 versus 12.8 weeks), except onaBoNT-A dose (65.0 versus 78.6 U/limb, p = 0.002). Of 1095 limb injections, there were 134 (12.2%) non-disabling and transient (mean 36 days) adverse events (132 limb weakness, 2 pain). OnaBoNT-A injections are safe and effective in the treatment of hand tremor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicki Niemann
- Parkinson's Disease Center and Movement Disorders Clinic, Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Joseph Jankovic
- Parkinson's Disease Center and Movement Disorders Clinic, Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|