Low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves

Surgical Management of Complex Aortic Valve Disease in Young Adults: Repair, Replacement, and Future Alternatives

The ideal aortic valve substitute in young adults remains unknown. Prosthetic valves are associated with a suboptimal survival and carry a significant risk of valve-related complications in young patients, mainly reinterventions with tissue valves and, thromboembolic events and major bleeding with mechanical prostheses. The Ross procedure is the only substitute that restores a survival curve similar to that of a matched general population, and permits a normal life without functional limitations. Though the risk of reintervention is the Achilles' heel of this procedure, it is very low in patients with aortic stenosis and can be mitigated in patients with aortic regurgitation by tailored surgical techniques. Finally, the Ozaki procedure and the transcatheter aortic valve implantation are seen by many as future alternatives but lack evidence and long-term follow-up in this specific patient population.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #61: Anticoagulation in pregnant patients with cardiac disease

Pregnancy in individuals with a mechanical heart valve has been classified as very high risk because of a substantially increased risk of maternal mortality or severe morbidity. Lifelong therapeutic anticoagulation is a principal component of the medical management of mechanical heart valves to prevent valve thrombosis. Anticoagulation regimens indicated outside of pregnancy for patients with mechanical valves should be continued during pregnancy with the possibility of modifications based on the type of valve, the trimester of pregnancy, individual risk tolerance, and circumstances around the time of delivery. The purpose of this document is to provide recommendations regarding the management of anticoagulation for common cardiac conditions complicating pregnancy, including mechanical heart valves, atrial fibrillation, systolic heart failure, and congenital heart disease.

Management of Anticoagulation in Pregnant Women With Mechanical Heart Valves

Importance

Mechanical heart valves (MHVs) pose significant thrombogenic risks to pregnant women and their fetuses, yet the choice of anticoagulation in this clinical setting remains unclear. Various therapeutic strategies carry distinct risk profiles that must be considered when making the decision about optimal anticoagulation.

Objective

We sought to review existing data and offer recommendations for the anticoagulation of pregnant women with MHVs, as well as management of anticoagulation in the peripartum period.

Evidence Acquisition

We performed a literature review of studies examining outcomes in pregnant women receiving systemic anticoagulation for mechanical valves, and also reviewed data on the safety profiles of various anticoagulant strategies in the setting of pregnancy.

Results

Warfarin has been shown to increase rates of embryopathy and fetal demise, although it has traditionally been the favored anticoagulant in this setting. Low-molecular-weight heparin, when dosed appropriately with close therapeutic monitoring, has been shown to be safe for both mother and fetus.

Conclusions

We favor the use of low-molecular-weight heparin with appropriate dosing and monitoring for the anticoagulation of pregnant women with MHVs. Data suggest that this approach minimizes the thrombotic risk associated with the valve while also providing safe and effective anticoagulation that can be easily managed in the peripartum period.

Pregnancy outcome in women with mechanical prosthetic heart valvesat their first trimester of pregnancy treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or enoxaparin: A randomized clinical trial

Introduction: Pregnancy increases the risks of thromboembolism for the mother and fetus in patients with mechanical heart valves. The results of some studies have indicated that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), in comparison with unfractionated heparin (UFH), leads to a lower incidence rate of thrombocytopenia and a decrease in bleeding.

Methods: The present randomized clinical trial involved 31 pregnant women with mechanical heart valves at their first trimester (0-14 weeks) of pregnancy. To perform the study, the patients were divided into two groups, i.e. group A (LMWH group-16 patients) and group B (UFH group-15 patients). The birth weight, mode of delivery, and gestational age at birth as well as the maternal and fetal complications were compared between the two groups.

Results: The mean age of mothers in the UFH and LMWH groups was 32.67±9.11 and 31.50±5.81years, respectively (P value > 0.05). Although the rate of maternal and fetal complications was higher in the UFH group as compared with the LMWH group, the observed difference was not significant (P value > 0.05).

Conclusion: LMWH can be regarded as a safer therapy for both the mother and fetus due to its lower number of refill prescriptions and fewer changes in the blood level.

Prevention and Management of Thromboembolism in Pregnancy When Heparins Are Not an Option

Heparins, unfractionated heparin, and low molecular weight heparin, are the preferred anticoagulants in pregnancy. There are circumstances, however, in which an alternative to heparin should be considered. These circumstances include, the presence of heparin resistance, a heparin allergy manifesting as heparin-induced skin reactions or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and the presence of a mechanical heart valve. From time to time, the obstetrician is called on to make recommendations about anticoagulants in pregnancy, including in circumstances in which an alternative to heparin has been suggested or is necessary. In this article, these circumstances are reviewed and alternative anticoagulants are discussed.

Antithrombotic Management of Patients With Prosthetic Heart Valves

Valvular heart disease is a major public health issue. The prevalence of valvular heart disease is expected to increase due to an aging population. Valve dysfunction manifests as valve stenosis, regurgitation, or both due to various etiologies. Valve repair and replacement are the main treatment options for severe valve dysfunction. Valve replacement is achieved by using either a mechanical or a bioprosthetic valve. Mechanical valves are more durable but require lifelong anticoagulation with associated complications. Bioprosthetic valves usually require anticoagulation only transiently after implantation but are less durable and degenerate more rapidly. In this article, we discuss antithrombotic regimens in persons after valve operations. We discuss general issues and antithrombotic recommendations for patients undergoing surgical bioprosthetic valve replacement, mechanical valve replacement (including different regimens for different positions and types of mechanical valves), mitral valve repair, and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. In addition, we discuss the antithrombotic management of patients in special circumstances, including patients with mechanical valves who have recurrent bleeding or thrombotic events, patients with mechanical valves undergoing surgery, and pregnant women with mechanical valves.

Congenital and Acquired Valvular Heart Disease in Pregnancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The number of pregnancies complicated by valvular heart disease is increasing. This review describes the hemodynamic effects of clinically important valvular abnormalities during pregnancy and reviews current guideline-driven management strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Valvular heart disease in women of childbearing age is most commonly caused by congenital abnormalities and rheumatic heart disease. Regurgitant lesions are well tolerated, while stenotic lesions are associated with a higher risk of pregnancy-related complications. Management of symptomatic disease during pregnancy is primarily medical, with percutaneous interventions considered for refractory symptoms. Most guidelines addressing the management of valvular heart disease during pregnancy are based on case reports and observational studies. Additional investigation is required to further advance the care of this growing patient population.

Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of Anticoagulation in Pregnant Women With Mechanical Heart Valves

Background

Anticoagulation for mechanical heart valves during pregnancy is essential to prevent thromboembolic events. Each regimen has drawbacks with regard to maternal or fetal risk.

Objectives

This meta-analysis sought to estimate and compare the risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves who received different methods of anticoagulation.

Methods

Studies were identified using a Medline search including all publications up to June 5, 2016. Study inclusion required reporting of maternal death, thromboembolism, and valve failure, and/or fetal spontaneous abortion, death, and congenital defects in pregnant women treated with any of the following: 1) a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) throughout pregnancy; 2) low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) throughout pregnancy; 3) LMWH for the first trimester, followed by a VKA (LMWH and VKA); or 4) unfractionated heparin for the first trimester, followed by a VKA (UFH and VKA).

Results

A total of 800 pregnancies from 18 publications were included. Composite maternal risk was lowest with VKA (5%), compared with LMWH (16%; ratio of averaged risk [RAR]: 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5 to 7.5), LMWH and VKA (16%; RAR: 3.1; 95% CI: 1.2 to 7.5), or UFH and VKA (16%; RAR: 3.1; 95% CI: 1.5 to 7.1). Composite fetal risk was lowest with LMWH (13%; RAR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.8), compared with VKA (39%), LMWH and VKA (23%), or UFH and VKA (34%). No significant difference in fetal risk was observed between women taking ≤5 mg daily warfarin and those with an LMWH regimen (RAR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.3 to 2.4).

Conclusions

VKA treatment was associated with the lowest risk of adverse maternal outcomes, whereas the use of LMWH throughout pregnancy was associated with the lowest risk of adverse fetal outcomes. Fetal risk was similar between women taking ≤5 mg warfarin daily and women treated with LMWH.

Consensus Document of the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO), Italian Society of Pediatric Cardiology (SICP), and Italian Society of Gynaecologists and Obstetrics (SIGO): pregnancy and congenital heart diseases

The success of cardiac surgery over the past 50 years has increased numbers and median age of survivors with congenital heart disease (CHD). Adults now represent two-thirds of patients with CHD; in the USA alone the number is estimated to exceed 1 million. In this population, many affected women reach reproductive age and wish to have children. While in many CHD patients pregnancy can be accomplished successfully, some special situations with complex anatomy, iatrogenic or residual pathology are associated with an increased risk of severe maternal and fetal complications. Pre-conception counselling allows women to come to truly informed choices. Risk stratification tools can also help high-risk women to eventually renounce to pregnancy and to adopt safe contraception options. Once pregnant, women identified as intermediate or high risk should receive multidisciplinary care involving a cardiologist, an obstetrician and an anesthesiologist with specific expertise in managing this peculiar medical challenge. This document is intended to provide cardiologists working in hospitals where an Obstetrics and Gynecology Department is available with a streamlined and practical tool, useful for them to select the best management strategies to deal with a woman affected by CHD who desires to plan pregnancy or is already pregnant.

Pregnancy Outcome in Women with Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valves Treated with Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) or Enoxaparin

OBJECTIVE

This study was carried out to determine the maternal (including thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications) and fetal outcomes (including miscarriage, stillbirth, baby death, and live birth) in women with mechanical heart valves managed with therapeutic doses of unfractionated heparin (UFH) versus enoxaparin during pregnancy.

METHODS

This is a prospective comparative, nonrandomized study. Pregnant women with mechanical heart valves presenting to high-risk pregnancy unit of Benha University Hospital, Egypt were treated with UFH 15,000 U/12 h versus enoxaparin (Clexane) 1 mg/kg SC/12 h during pregnancy and the results were analyzed.

RESULTS

40 pregnant women were included in the study. In 20 pregnant women, anticoagulation was with UFH, and 20 pregnant women received enoxaparin. One (3 %) thrombotic complication occurred with enoxaparin treatment. Noncompliance or subtherapeutic levels contributed to this outcome in this case. Antenatal hemorrhage occurred in 4 (10 %) and postpartum hemorrhagic complications in 5 (12.5 %) pregnancies. Of the 32 pregnant women who continued after 20 weeks' gestation, 100 % (17/17) of the women taking predominantly UFH had a surviving infant compared with 93 % (14/15) of the women taking primarily enoxaparin (p = 0.25). One intrauterine fetal death occurred in the enoxaparin group. There was no significant difference in the live birth rates between the two groups (p = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Compliance with therapeutic dose of UFH during pregnancy in women with mechanical heart valves is associated with a low risk of valve thrombosis and good fetal outcomes, but meticulous monitoring is essential.

Postpartum hemorrhage in the setting of a mechanical heart valve

Background:

Therapeutic anticoagulation is required for all patients with prosthetic mitral valves. Anticoagulation with warfarin is recommended; however, warfarin is teratogenic in early pregnancy and therefore alternate anticoagulation regimens are suggested for pregnant patients.

Case:

A 28-year-old gravida 2, para 1 woman at 36 weeks’ gestation with a prosthetic mitral valve and a history of a corrected anomalous origin of the left coronary artery arising from the left pulmonary artery presented in labor. She underwent a spontaneous vaginal delivery complicated by a postpartum hemorrhage necessitating a hysterectomy.

Conclusion:

Management of mechanical valves in pregnancy is controversial. The provider must weigh the risks of life threatening valve thrombosis and malfunction against the risk of significant hemorrhage. This case report reviews peripartum anticoagulation protocols and management of massive hemorrhage in patients with prosthetic mechanical valves.

Valve disease in pregnancy

Maternal cardiac disease is a major cause of non-obstetric morbidity and accounts for 10-25% of maternal mortality. Valvular heart disease may result from congenital abnormalities or acquired lesions, some of which may involve more than one valve. Maternal and fetal risks in pregnant patients with valve disease vary according to the type and severity of the valve lesion along with resulting abnormalities of functional capacity, left ventricular function, and pulmonary artery pressure. Certain high-risk conditions are considered contraindications to pregnancy, while others may be successfully managed with observation, medications, and, in refractory cases, surgical intervention. Communication between the patient׳s obstetrician, maternal-fetal medicine specialist, obstetrical anesthesiologist, and cardiologist is critical in managing a pregnancy with underlying maternal cardiac disease. The management of the various types of valve diseases in pregnancy will be reviewed here, along with a discussion of related complications including mechanical prosthetic valves and infective endocarditis.

Cardiac, obstetric, and fetal outcomes during pregnancy after biological or mechanical aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess pregnancy-related cardiac, maternal, and fetal outcomes in women who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR).

METHODS

From 1978-2011, 67 women < 40 years of age underwent 74 isolated AVRs (52 mechanical prostheses and 22 bioprostheses). All patients were prospectively followed at our dedicated valve clinic. Patients with Turner syndrome, previous hysterectomy, or tubal ligation were excluded. Cardiovascular, obstetric, and fetal outcomes were gathered from medical records and telephone interviews.

RESULTS

A total of 27 pregnancies were reported in 14 patients (bioprosthetic AVR, n = 20; mechanical AVR, n = 7). In the bioprosthetic AVR group, the following adverse events occurred: hospitalizations for syncope (n = 2), prosthetic valve deterioration after pregnancy necessitating reintervention 6 months postpartum (n = 1), miscarriages (n = 9), and preterm birth (n = 1). In the mechanical AVR group, the following adverse events occurred: embolic myocardial infarctions with a decrease in systolic function (n = 2; 1 pregnancy was terminated and 1 was completed), miscarriage (n = 1), postpartum bleeding (n = 1), urgent cesarean section for placental abruption (n = 1), and preterm birth (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study suggest that pregnancies in women with mechanical AVRs are associated with a higher risk of cardiac and obstetric adverse events. Thus, from this limited cohort, it appears that pregnancies in women with bioprostheses are safer than those in patients with mechanical AVRs.

Effect of lipid composition of cationic SUV liposomes on materno-fetal transfer of warfarin across the perfused human term placenta

INTRODUCTION

Use of drugs that cross the placenta freely are currently avoided during pregnancy. We investigated whether cationic small unilamellar (SUV) liposomes of different lipid compositions could prevent the transfer and uptake of warfarin across human term placenta.

METHODS

Cationic liposomes encapsulated warfarin was prepared by using lecithin (F-SUV) or sterylamine (S-SUV) with cholesterol and stearylamine. The size distribution, encapsulation efficiency, and stability were determined in blood-based media. The transfer kinetics of free and liposomally encapsulated warfarin were studied in a dually perfused isolated lobule of human term placenta with creatinine. Concentrations of warfarin were measured by fluorimetry. Data are expressed as % of initial dose added and given as mean ± sd.

RESULTS

Warfarin crossed the placenta freely (14.9 ± 1.1%). Trans placental transfer of warfarin was significantly reduced by F-SUV (6.4 ± 0.6%; P < 0.001) and S-SUV liposomes (5.0 ± 0.8%; P < 0.001). Placental uptake of F-SUV (6.3 ± 1.7%; P < 0.001) was greater than that of S-SUV liposomes (2.2 ± 0.5%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that cationic liposomes reduce trans placental transfer of warfarin. If confirmed "in vivo", liposomes might provide an alternative non-invasive method of drug delivery to the mother.

Is there a suitable method of anticoagulation in pregnant patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves?

A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol in order to identify the mode of anticoagulation that has the best safety profile for both the mother and the foetus in pregnant patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves. A total of 281 papers were identified using the reported search, of which eight represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, date, journal, study type, population, main outcome measures and results are tabulated. The reported measures were foetal mortality, maternal mortality, congenital abnormalities and embryopathy, and maternal thromboembolic and haemorrhagic complications. The medical orthodoxy has warned of the combination of oral anticoagulation and pregnancy due to the well-documented warfarin embryopathy. Yet only one of the reported papers identified a greater incidence of foetal aberrations among warfarin use, with the highest reported rate being 6.4% and two of the assessed papers reporting no embryopathy at all. Foetal mortality with oral anticoagulation use ranged from 1.52 to 76%. All reported publications demonstrated a superior maternal outcome with warfarin use, with a range of thromboembolic events from 0 to 10% in comparison with 4 to 48% where heparin was used. Thus, it is concluded that warfarin is a more durable anticoagulant with a better maternal outcome despite it carrying a greater foetal risk. Although, in contrast to previous teaching, the risks of embryopathy are not the major drawback of oral anticoagulation. Heparin is consistently less effective, but may be preferred for the superior foetal outcome. Heparin usage during the first trimester reduces the foetal risk but is still associated with an adverse maternal outcome. While the focus for clinicians looking after pregnant women with mechanical heart valves may be to prevent maternal thromboembolic complications, the overriding concern for many women is to avoid any harm to their unborn child, even when this places their health at risk. Thus women with mechanical heart valves must be fully informed of the risks involved with different anticoagulation for an informed decision to be made.

An audit of pregnant women with prosthetic heart valves at a tertiary hospital in South Africa: a five-year experience

BACKGROUND

Cardiac disease in pregnancy is a common problem in under-resourced countries and a significant cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. A large proportion of patients with cardiac disease have prosthetic mechanical heart valve replacements, warranting prophylactic anticoagulation.

AIM

To evaluate obstetric outcomes in women with prosthetic heart valves in an under-resourced country.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of 61 pregnant patients with prosthetic valve prostheses referred to our tertiary hospital over a five-year period.

RESULTS

Sixty-one (6%) of 1 021 pregnant women with A diagnosis of cardiac disease had prosthetic heart valves. Fifty-nine had mechanical valves and were on prophylactic anticoagulation therapy, three had stopped their medication prior to pregnancy and two had bioprosthetic valves. There were forty-one (67%) live births, two (3%) early neonatal deaths, 12 (20%) miscarriages and six (10%) stillbirths. Maternal complications included mitral valve thrombosis (n = 4), atrial fibrillation (n = 8), infective endocarditis (n = 6), caesarean section wound haematomas (n = 7), broad ligament haematoma (n = 1) and warfarin embryopathy (n = 4). Haemorrhagic complications occurred in five patients and all five required blood transfusions.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic anticoagulation with warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses was associated with high rates of maternal and neonatal complications, including significant foetal wastage in the first and early second trimesters of pregnancy. Health professionals providing care for pregnant women with prosthetic heart valves must consistently advise on family planning matters, adherence to anticoagulation regimes and consider the use of prophylactic anticoagulant regimens other than warfarin, particularly during the first trimester of pregnancy.

VTE, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

The use of anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy is challenging because of the potential for both fetal and maternal complications. This guideline focuses on the management of VTE and thrombophilia as well as the use of antithrombotic agents during pregnancy.

METHODS

The methods of this guideline follow the Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines in this supplement.

RESULTS

We recommend low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention and treatment of VTE in pregnant women instead of unfractionated heparin (Grade 1B). For pregnant women with acute VTE, we suggest that anticoagulants be continued for at least 6 weeks postpartum (for a minimum duration of therapy of 3 months) compared with shorter durations of treatment (Grade 2C). For women who fulfill the laboratory criteria for antiphospholipid antibody (APLA) syndrome and meet the clinical APLA criteria based on a history of three or more pregnancy losses, we recommend antepartum administration of prophylactic or intermediate-dose unfractionated heparin or prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin combined with low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg/d) over no treatment (Grade 1B). For women with inherited thrombophilia and a history of pregnancy complications, we suggest not to use antithrombotic prophylaxis (Grade 2C). For women with two or more miscarriages but without APLA or thrombophilia, we recommend against antithrombotic prophylaxis (Grade 1B).

CONCLUSIONS

Most recommendations in this guideline are based on observational studies and extrapolation from other populations. There is an urgent need for appropriately designed studies in this population.

The effect of warfarin dosage on maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with prosthetic heart valves

There are several challenges in the management of pregnant women with mechanical heart valves. Pregnancy increases the risk of thromboembolism and there is currently no consensus on the safest anticoagulation method during pregnancy. The objective of the study was to determine the correlation between the warfarin dose and pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with prosthetic heart valves. Warfarin in pregnancy was associated with a low risk of valve thrombosis or maternal death. The risk for fetal abnormalities was not related to the maternal warfarin dosage. However, the risk for stillbirth was significantly increased with increasing doses of warfarin.

Fluctuations in anti-factor Xa levels with therapeutic enoxaparin anticoagulation in pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate anti-factor Xa levels with therapeutic enoxaparin anticoagulation in pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 15 pregnant subjects on therapeutic doses of enoxaparin (1 mg/kg +/-20% subcutaneously (s.c.) twice daily (b.i.d.)) were enrolled prospectively in this cross-sectional pilot project. Three blood levels for anti-factor Xa activity were examined: before the enoxaparin dose (trough), 3- to 4-h later (peak) and 8-h later. Anti-factor Xa activity level between 0.5 and 1.2 U/ml was considered therapeutic.

RESULT

Mean anti-factor Xa activity levels were: trough 0.45+/-0.18, peak 0.9+/-0.25 and 8-h after dose 0.72+/-0.23 U/ml. All peak levels were therapeutic; 20% (3/15) of the 8 h and 73% (11/15) of the trough levels were sub-therapeutic.

CONCLUSION

Trough and 8-h post-dose anti-factor Xa activity levels were sub-therapeutic in a substantial number of patients receiving a b.i.d. regimen of therapeutic enoxaparin.

Use of high intensity adjusted dose low molecular weight heparin in women with mechanical heart valves during pregnancy: a single-center experience

The use of standard dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to anticoagulate women with mechanical valves in pregnancy is associated with morbidity and mortality. We conducted a prospective audit of the use of adjusted dose high intensity LMWH in 12 pregnancies in 11 women with prosthetic heart valves. LMWH +/- low-dose aspirin was started at therapeutic-dose with monitoring of anti-Xa levels to achieve a target level of 1.0-1.2 IU/mL (0.8-1.2 in the first 3/12 pregnancies). This necessitated a mean increase in the dose of LMWH of 54.4% (SD+/-33.2) over initial dose. Eleven of 12 pregnancies resulted in live births, with one intrauterine fetal death at 37 weeks. One non-fatal valve thrombosis occurred at 26 weeks gestation associated with subtherapeutic anti-Xa levels. Three patients experienced major bleeding. This regime provides a therapeutic option for women with mechanical heart valves during pregnancy, provided anti-Xa levels are kept within the target range. These patients require close surveillance for bleeding and thrombotic complications within a multi-disciplinary setting.

Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy

The purpose of this review is to summarize the epidemiology of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pregnancy and describe strategies used to prevent and treat it. The main reason for the increased risk of VTE in pregnancy is hypercoagulability. The hypercoagulability of pregnancy, which has likely evolved to protect women from the bleeding challenges of miscarriage and childbirth, is present as early as the first trimester and so is the increased risk of VTE. Other risk factors include a history of thrombosis, inherited and acquired thrombophilia, certain medical conditions, and complications of pregnancy and childbirth. Candidates for anticoagulation are women with a current thrombosis, a history of thrombosis, thrombophilia, and a history of poor pregnancy outcome, or postpartum risk factors for VTE. For fetal reasons, the preferred agents for anticoagulation in pregnancy are heparins. There are no large trials of anticoagulants in pregnancy and recommendations are based on case series and the opinion of experts. Nonetheless, anticoagulants are believed to improve the outcome of pregnancy for women who have or have had VTE.

Where do we go now with low molecular weight heparin use in obstetric care?

The use of low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) in obstetric care has grown considerably since their introduction into clinical practice in the early 1990s. However, because of the physiological changes of pregnancy, the predictable pharmacokinetic profile of LMWH is lost and some uncertainty exists around the optimal dosing regimen for LMWH in obstetric care. Two recent United Kingdom prospective surveys of the management of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) suggest that despite recommendations from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) for a twice daily LMWH regimen, a once daily regimen is acceptable for the treatment of venous thromboembolism; and that accepted thromboprophylactic doses licensed for non-pregnant individuals may not be applicable during the second and third trimester for VTE thromboprophylaxis. Accepting that randomized clinical studies are difficult in obstetric care, future advances could be made through population-based multi-center studies, coupled with pharmacokinetic modeling studies, which have the potential to determine the optimal dosing regimen for the various obstetric indications.

Pregnancy and adult congenital heart disease

Increasing numbers of women with complex congenital heart disease are reaching childbearing age. Pregnancy is a major issue in the management of adult congenital heart disease. Cardiac disease is one of the most common causes of maternal morbidity and mortality. Complications, such as growth retardation, preterm and premature birth and even fetal and neonatal mortality, are more frequent among children of women with congenital heart disease. The risk of complications is determined by the severity of the cardiac lesion, the presence of cyanosis, the maternal functional class and the use of anticoagulation. However, the pathophysiology of these complications is not completely understood and may be related to a diminished increase in cardiac output and/or endothelial dysfunction. The management of pregnant cardiac patients is based on limited clinical information. This article reviews pre-pregnancy counseling and management during pregnancy in patients with congenital heart disease.

Thromboembolism in pregnancy: recurrence and its prevention

Fifteen to 25% of thromboembolic events in pregnancy are recurrent events. Women with a history of thrombosis have a three- to fourfold increased risk of recurrence when they are pregnant compared with when they are not. The risks are even higher postpartum. The rate of recurrent venous thromboembolic events without anticoagulation is 2.4% to 12.2%, whereas the rate with anticoagulation is 0% to 2.4%. Because the rates of recurrent thromboembolism can be reduced with anticoagulation, women with a history of thrombosis who are not on lifelong anticoagulation will likely require anticoagulation during pregnancy, or at least during the postpartum period. Women who are already on lifelong warfarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism should be counseled about the teratogenic effects of warfarin and offered the opportunity to be converted to heparin before conception. During pregnancy, low-molecular-weight heparin, with fewer side effects and a longer half-life, is generally preferred over unfractionated heparin. Unfractionated heparin with its shorter half-life is generally preferred around the time of delivery. Women on antiplatelet medication for prevention of arterial thromboembolism may be converted to low-dose aspirin after conception and supplemented with low-dose heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin during pregnancy. Because current recommendations rely on case series and expert opinion, additional studies including randomized trials might enhance our ability to prevent recurrent thromboembolism in pregnancy.

Challenges in managing anticoagulant therapy in patients with heart valve prostheses

There is a wide array of recommendations for the management of anticoagulant therapy in patients with mechanical heart valves. The optimal intensity of vitamin K antagonists, management of patients during noncardiac surgery and use of anticoagulants during pregnancy are all ongoing matters of debate. In this review, we discuss the various studies on these topics and the different guidelines. Based on these, literature recommendations for daily clinical practice are formulated.

Effect of electrical stimulus parameters on the development and propagation of action potentials in short excitable fibres

Intracellular action potentials (IAPs) produced by short fibres in response to their electrical stimulation were analysed. IAPs were calculated on the basis of the Hodgkin-Huxley (1952) model by the method described by Joyner et al. (1978). Principal differences were found in processes of activation of short (semilength L less than 5 lambda) and long fibres under near-threshold stimulation. The shorter the fibre, the lower was the threshold value (Ithr). Dependence of the latency on the stimulus strength (Ist) was substantially non-linear and was affected by the fibre length. Both fibre length and stimulus strength influenced the IAP amplitude, the instantaneous propagation velocity (IPV) and the site of the first origin of the IAP (and, consequently, excitability of the short fibre membrane). With L less than or equal to 2 lambda and Ithr less than or equal to Ist less than or equal to 1.1Ithr, IPV could reach either very high values (so that all the fibre membrane fired practically simultaneously) or even negative values. The latter corresponded to the first origin of the propagated IAP, not at the site of stimulation but at the fibre termination or at a midpoint. The characters of all the above dependencies were unchanged irrespective of the manner of approaching threshold (variation of stimulus duration or its strength). Reasons for differences in processes of activation of short and long fibres are discussed in terms of electrical load and latency. Applications of the results to explain an increased jitter, velocity recovery function and velocity-diameter relationship are also discussed.