1
|
Pecker LH, Cameron K. Sickle cell disease and infertility risks: implications for counseling and care of affected girls and women. Expert Rev Hematol 2024; 17:493-504. [PMID: 38913857 PMCID: PMC11293988 DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2024.2372320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sickle cell disease (SCD), its treatments and cures present infertility risks. Fertility counseling is broadly indicated for affected girls and women and fertility preservation may appeal to some. Several streams of evidence suggest that the reproductive lifespan of women with SCD is reduced. Pregnancy is associated with high miscarriage rates. There are enduring questions about the effects of highly effective hydroxyurea treatment on female fertility. Current conditioning regimens for gene therapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplant are gonadotoxic. Fertility preservation methods exist as non-experimental standards of care for girls and women. Clinicians are challenged to overcome multifactorial barriers to incorporate fertility counseling and fertility preservation care into routine SCD care. AREAS COVERED Here we provide a narrative review of existing evidence regarding fertility and infertility risks in girls and women with SCD and consider counseling implications of existing evidence. EXPERT OPINION Addressing fertility for girls and women with SCD requires engaging concerns that emerge across the lifespan, acknowledging uncertainty and identifying barriers to care, some of which may be insurmountable without public policy changes. The contemporary SCD care paradigm can offer transformative SCD treatments alongside comprehensive counselling that addresses fertility risks and fertility preservation opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia H. Pecker
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Katie Cameron
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Affdal AO, Salama M, Ravitsky V. Ethical, legal, social, and policy issues of ovarian tissue cryopreservation in prepubertal girls: a critical interpretive review. J Assist Reprod Genet 2024; 41:999-1026. [PMID: 38430324 PMCID: PMC11052756 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03059-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite the increasing number of childhood cancer survivors, significant advances in ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) technique and medical societies' recommendations, fertility preservation (FP) and FP discussions are not always offered as a standard of care in the pediatric context. The aim of this literature review is to understand what ethical, legal, social, and policy issues may influence the provision of FP by OTC in prepubertal girls with cancer. METHODS A critical interpretive review of peer-reviewed papers published between 2000 and January 2023 was conducted, guided by the McDougall's version of the critical interpretive synthesis (Dixon-Woods), to capture recurring concepts, principles, and arguments regarding FP by OTC for prepubertal girls. RESULTS Of 931 potentially relevant papers, 162 were included in our analysis. Data were grouped into seven thematic categories: (1) risks of the procedure, (2) unique decision-making issues in pediatric oncofertility, (3) counseling, (4) cultural and cost issues, and (5) disposition of cryopreserved reproductive tissue. CONCLUSION This first literature review focusing on ethical, legal, social, and policy issues surrounding OTC in prepubertal girls highlights concerns in the oncofertility debate. Although OTC is no longer experimental as of December 2019, these issues could limit its availability and the child's future reproductive autonomy. This review concludes that specific actions must be provided to enable the offer of FP, such as supporting families' decision-making in this unique and complex context, and providing pediatric patients universal and full access to free or highly subsidized OTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Vardit Ravitsky
- University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
- The Hastings Center, Garrison, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pecker LH, Oteng-Ntim E, Nero A, Lanzkron S, Christianson MS, Woolford T, Meacham LR, Mishkin AD. Expecting more: the case for incorporating fertility services into comprehensive sickle cell disease care. Lancet Haematol 2023; 10:e225-e234. [PMID: 36708736 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(22)00353-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are not yet systematically available to people with sickle cell disease or their parents. Fertility care for these groups requires addressing sickle cell disease-associated infertility risks, fertility preservation options, pregnancy possibilities and outcomes, and, when needed, infertility treatment. People with a chance of having a child with sickle cell disease can use in-vitro fertilisation with preimplantation genetic testing to conceive a child unaffected by sickle cell disease. Also, parents of children with sickle cell disease can use this technology to identify embryos to become potential future matched sibling donors for stem cell transplant. In the USA, disparities in fertility care for the sickle cell disease community are especially stark. Universal screening of newborn babies' identifies sickle cell disease and sickle cell trait, guidelines direct preconception genetic carrier screening, and standard-of-care fertility preserving options exist. However, potentially transformative treatments and cures for patients with sickle cell disease are not used due to iatrogenic infertility concerns. In diversely resourced care settings, obstacles to providing fertility care to people affected by sickle cell disease persist. In this Viewpoint, we contend that fertility care should be incorporated into the comprehensive care model for sickle cell disease, supporting alignment of treatment goals with reproductive life plans and delivering on the promise of individualised high-quality care for people with sickle cell disease and their families. We consider the obligation to provide fertility care in light of medical evidence, with acknowledgment of formidable obstacles to optimising care, and powerful historical and ethical considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia H Pecker
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Eugene Oteng-Ntim
- Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London, London, UK; Women's Services, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Alecia Nero
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Sophie Lanzkron
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mindy S Christianson
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Teonna Woolford
- Sickle Cell Reproductive Health Education Directive, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Lillian R Meacham
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center Children's Healthcare of Atlanta; Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Pediatrics Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Adrienne D Mishkin
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cell Therapy Program, Division of Hematology & Oncology and Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Incorporating gonadal health counseling into pediatric care of sickle cell patients. HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2022; 2022:442-449. [PMID: 36485118 PMCID: PMC9820063 DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2022000382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Discussions regarding gonadal function and possible disease or treatment-related ovarian or testicular dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, and possible future infertility can be challenging in the sickle cell disease (SCD) pediatric care setting. A construct that stratifies topics into those that are time sensitive and those that require reproductive care expertise vs address gonadal health as a part of normal SCD care may be helpful. Pediatric health care discussions of gonadal function/dysfunction for patients with SCD can include (1) time-sensitive fertility consults preceding the start of gonadotoxic therapy and (2) targeted discussions at key time points during normally scheduled hematology clinic visits. The former conversations are best led by individuals with expertise in the risk for treatment-related infertility and fertility preservation. The latter discussions can be incorporated into targeted regularly scheduled visits with hematologists. These topics can be addressed as a part of planned education in pediatric care for adolescents and incorporated into transition plans as young adults transfer care to adult providers. Although the topics of puberty and gonadal health can be uncomfortable and many complex interdisciplinary and ethical issues arise in this process, these discussions can be aided by the collaterals and teaching handouts presented in this article.
Collapse
|
5
|
OUP accepted manuscript. Hum Reprod Update 2022; 28:747-762. [DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmac019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
6
|
Pediatric and Adolescent Oncofertility in Male Patients-From Alpha to Omega. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:genes12050701. [PMID: 34066795 PMCID: PMC8150386 DOI: 10.3390/genes12050701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
This article reviews the latest information about preserving reproductive potential that can offer enhanced prospects for future conception in the pediatric male population with cancer, whose fertility is threatened because of the gonadotoxic effects of chemotherapy and radiation. An estimated 400,000 children and adolescents aged 0–19 years will be diagnosed with cancer each year. Fertility is compromised in one-third of adult male survivors of childhood cancer. We present the latest approaches and techniques for fertility preservation, starting with fertility preservation counselling, a clinical practice guideline used around the world and finishing with recent advances in basic science and translational research. Improving strategies for the maturation of germ cells in vitro combined with new molecular techniques for gene editing could be the next scientific keystone to eradicate genetic diseases such as cancer related mutations in the offspring of cancer survivors.
Collapse
|
7
|
Woodruff TK, Ataman-Millhouse L, Acharya KS, Almeida-Santos T, Anazodo A, Anderson RA, Appiah L, Bader J, Becktell K, Brannigan RE, Breech L, Bourlon MT, Bumbuliene Ž, Burns K, Campo-Engelstein L, Campos JR, Centola GM, Chehin MB, Chen D, De Vos M, Duncan FE, El-Damen A, Fair D, Famuyiwa Y, Fechner PY, Fontoura P, Frias O, Gerkowicz SA, Ginsberg J, Gracia CR, Goldman K, Gomez-Lobo V, Hazelrigg B, Hsieh MH, Hoyos LR, Hoyos-Martinez A, Jach R, Jassem J, Javed M, Jayasinghe Y, Jeelani R, Jeruss JS, Kaul-Mahajan N, Keim-Malpass J, Ketterl TG, Khrouf M, Kimelman D, Kusuhara A, Kutteh WH, Laronda MM, Lee JR, Lehmann V, Letourneau JM, McGinnis LK, McMahon E, Meacham LR, Mijangos MFV, Moravek M, Nahata L, Ogweno GM, Orwig KE, Pavone ME, Peccatori FA, Pesce RI, Pulaski H, Quinn G, Quintana R, Quintana T, de Carvalho BR, Ramsey-Goldman R, Reinecke J, Reis FM, Rios J, Rhoton-Vlasak AS, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Roeca C, Rotz SJ, Rowell E, Salama M, Saraf AJ, Scarella A, Schafer-Kalkhoff T, Schmidt D, Senapati S, Shah D, Shikanov A, Shnorhavorian M, Skiles JL, Smith JF, Smith K, Sobral F, Stimpert K, Su HI, Sugimoto K, Suzuki N, Thakur M, Victorson D, Viale L, Vitek W, Wallace WH, Wartella EA, Westphal LM, Whiteside S, Wilcox LH, Wyns C, Xiao S, Xu J, Zelinski M. A View from the past into our collective future: the oncofertility consortium vision statement. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:3-15. [PMID: 33405006 PMCID: PMC7786868 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01983-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Today, male and female adult and pediatric cancer patients, individuals transitioning between gender identities, and other individuals facing health extending but fertility limiting treatments can look forward to a fertile future. This is, in part, due to the work of members associated with the Oncofertility Consortium. Methods The Oncofertility Consortium is an international, interdisciplinary initiative originally designed to explore the urgent unmet need associated with the reproductive future of cancer survivors. As the strategies for fertility management were invented, developed or applied, the individuals for who the program offered hope, similarly expanded. As a community of practice, Consortium participants share information in an open and rapid manner to addresses the complex health care and quality-of-life issues of cancer, transgender and other patients. To ensure that the organization remains contemporary to the needs of the community, the field designed a fully inclusive mechanism for strategic planning and here present the findings of this process. Results This interprofessional network of medical specialists, scientists, and scholars in the law, medical ethics, religious studies and other disciplines associated with human interventions, explore the relationships between health, disease, survivorship, treatment, gender and reproductive longevity. Conclusion The goals are to continually integrate the best science in the service of the needs of patients and build a community of care that is ready for the challenges of the field in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa K Woodruff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Lauren Ataman-Millhouse
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kelly S Acharya
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Duke Fertility Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Teresa Almeida-Santos
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal.,Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia.,Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard A Anderson
- Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Leslie Appiah
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Joy Bader
- ReproTech, Ltd., Saint Paul, MN, USA
| | | | - Robert E Brannigan
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Lesley Breech
- Department of Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Maria T Bourlon
- Hemato-Oncology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Žana Bumbuliene
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Karen Burns
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Division of Oncology, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Lisa Campo-Engelstein
- Institute for the Medical Humanities, Department of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | | | - Grace M Centola
- Dadi, Inc., Brooklyn, NY, USA.,Phoenix Sperm Bank of Seattle Sperm Bank, Phoenix, AZ, USA.,New England Cryogenic Center/New England Cord Blood Bank, Marlborough, MA, USA
| | | | - Diane Chen
- Potocsnak Family Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine and Pritzker Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.,Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, and Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michel De Vos
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Follicle Biology Laboratory (FOBI), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, Perinatology and Reproductology, Institute of Professional Education, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Francesca E Duncan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ahmed El-Damen
- IVIRMA Middle East Fertility Clinic, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.,Division of Embryology and Comparative Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Douglas Fair
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Utah, Primary Children's Hospital, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Yemi Famuyiwa
- Montgomery Fertility Center, Rockville, MD, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Patricia Y Fechner
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Olivia Frias
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | - Jill Ginsberg
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Clarisa R Gracia
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kara Goldman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Veronica Gomez-Lobo
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Michael H Hsieh
- Department of Urology, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Luis R Hoyos
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alfonso Hoyos-Martinez
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Diabetes and Endocrinology, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert Jach
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Jacek Jassem
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Murid Javed
- OriginElle Fertility Clinic and Women's Health Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Yasmin Jayasinghe
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Roohi Jeelani
- Vios Fertility Institute, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jacqueline S Jeruss
- Departments of Surgery, Pathology, and Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nalini Kaul-Mahajan
- Mother & Child Hospital, New Delhi, India.,Ferticity Fertility Clinics, New Delhi, India
| | - Jessica Keim-Malpass
- School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Tyler G Ketterl
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Dana Kimelman
- Centro de Esterilidad Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Atsuko Kusuhara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - William H Kutteh
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.,Department of Surgery, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Monica M Laronda
- Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jung Ryeol Lee
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Fertility Preservation and Enhancement Research Laboratory, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Vicky Lehmann
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph M Letourneau
- University of Utah Center for Reproductive Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Lynda K McGinnis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Eileen McMahon
- Sinai Health System, Mount Sinai Fertility, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lillian R Meacham
- Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer Center of Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Monserrat Fabiola Velez Mijangos
- Biology of Human Reproduction Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Molly Moravek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Leena Nahata
- Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - George Moses Ogweno
- Reproductive Endocrinology and Fertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Nairobi Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.,Esis Health Services (EHS), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Kyle E Orwig
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mary Ellen Pavone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
- Fertility & Procreation Unit, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Romina Ileana Pesce
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Hanna Pulaski
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Gwendolyn Quinn
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Medical Ethics, Population Health, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman
- Department of Medicine/Division of Rheumatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Fernando M Reis
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Julie Rios
- Department of Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Alice S Rhoton-Vlasak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Cassandra Roeca
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Seth J Rotz
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Erin Rowell
- Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mahmoud Salama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Amanda J Saraf
- Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Anibal Scarella
- Centro de Reproducción Humana, Facultad Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.,Departamento de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
| | | | - Deb Schmidt
- Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Suneeta Senapati
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Divya Shah
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ariella Shikanov
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Margarett Shnorhavorian
- Department of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jodi L Skiles
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - James F Smith
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kristin Smith
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Fabio Sobral
- Pregna Medicina Reproductiva, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Kyle Stimpert
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - H Irene Su
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Kouhei Sugimoto
- International Center for Reproductive Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Nao Suzuki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Mili Thakur
- Reproductive Genomics Program, The Fertility Center, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - David Victorson
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Wendy Vitek
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - W Hamish Wallace
- Paediatric Oncology, University of Edinburgh & Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Ellen A Wartella
- Center on Media and Human Development, School of Communication, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Lynn M Westphal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Stacy Whiteside
- Fertility & Reproductive Health Program, Department of Hematology/Oncology/BMT, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Christine Wyns
- Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Shuo Xiao
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Environmental Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Jing Xu
- Division of Reproductive & Developmental Sciences, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, OR, USA.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Mary Zelinski
- Division of Reproductive & Developmental Sciences, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, OR, USA.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Linkeviciute A, Buonomo B, Fazio N, Spada F, Peccatori FA. Discussing motherhood when the oncological prognosis is dire: ethical considerations for physicians. ESMO Open 2020; 5:e000956. [PMID: 33172958 PMCID: PMC7656910 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Physicians are increasingly open to discussing and supporting pregnancy after cancer treatment. However, counselling patients who are seeking pregnancy despite advanced oncological disease and/or uncertain prognosis is still challenging. Two paradigmatic cases are presented and analysed to illustrate the ethical uneasiness faced by treating physicians when seriously ill patients seek fertility preservation and/or pregnancy. Review of ethical issues is built around the four principles of biomedical ethics. Respect for patients autonomy in relation to managing realistic expectations and avoiding giving patients false hopes opens the analysis. It is followed by considering fair allocation of resources and meaningful distinction between protecting patients from harm and contributing to their welfare. Responsibilities towards the unborn child are discussed in a light of maternal and fetal interdependency. Respecting personal autonomy requires abstaining from controlling inferences to the individual patient's choices, but it does not mean that patients should be left on their own to pick and choose their disease management approaches without advice and guidance from healthcare professionals. Physicians should reason evaluating the potential harms and checking if benefits will outweigh the risks and if costs will produce the best overall results. Responsibilities towards the unborn child can be managed by balancing the respect for maternal autonomy and beneficence for pregnant woman and her fetus. The oncologist cannot determine how patients should view their disease but with empathy and compassion can help them understand the logical rationale behind clinical advice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alma Linkeviciute
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Barbara Buonomo
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Nicola Fazio
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Francesca Spada
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Fedro A Peccatori
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Affdal AO, Ravitsky V. Chapitre 9. Oncofertilité et jeunes filles prépubères : Un « droit à un avenir ouvert » ? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; Vol. 30:159-177. [PMID: 32372595 DOI: 10.3917/jibes.303.0159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Chemotherapy and radiotherapy have increased the life expectancy of cancer patients but may cause premature ovarian failure and irreversible loss of fertility. In the context of childhood cancers, it is now acknowledged that possible negative effects of treatment on future reproductive autonomy are a major concern. While a few options are open to patients post-puberty, the only option currently open to prepubescent girls is cryopreservation of ovarian tissue and subsequent transplantation. Yet, this procedure raises ethical concerns related to its experimental nature and to risks involved in surgery and general anesthesia. In addition, the risk of malignant cells being reintroduced in the future following autologous transplantation of the ovarian tissue is still poorly evaluated. A number of ethical issues arise surrounding this procedure. While the girl's future reproductive autonomy is at stake, it is important to also consider risks associated with the procedure. Fertility preservation through cryopreservation of ovarian tissue thus raises a conflict between the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence. We argue that the ethical complexity surrounding fertility preservation for prepubescent girls should be resolved by applying the principle of "the child's right to an open future". We propose to consider 'beneficence' through the lens of the reproductive autonomy and her potentialin becoming a genetic parent.
Collapse
|
10
|
Moravek MB, Appiah LC, Anazodo A, Burns KC, Gomez-Lobo V, Hoefgen HR, Frias OJ, Laronda MM, Levine J, Meacham LR, Pavone ME, Quinn GP, Rowell EE, Strine AC, Woodruff TK, Nahata L. Development of a Pediatric Fertility Preservation Program: A Report From the Pediatric Initiative Network of the Oncofertility Consortium. J Adolesc Health 2019; 64:563-573. [PMID: 30655118 PMCID: PMC6478520 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.10.297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2018] [Revised: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Infertility is known to decrease quality of life among adults. In some cases, infertility is caused by medical conditions and/or treatments prescribed in childhood, and using methods to protect or preserve fertility may expand future reproductive possibilities. Structured programs to offer counseling about infertility risk and fertility preservation options are essential in the care of pediatric patients facing fertility-threatening conditions or treatments, yet multiple barriers to program development exist. This report was developed from the institutional experiences of members of the Pediatric Initiative Network of the Oncofertility Consortium, with the intent of providing guidance for health care providers aiming to establish programs at institutions lacking pediatric fertility preservation services. The mechanics of building a fertility preservation program are discussed, including essential team members, target populations, fertility preservation options (both established and experimental), survivorship issues, research opportunities, and ethical considerations. Common barriers to program development and utilization, including low referral rates and financial concerns, are also discussed, and recommendations made for overcoming such barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly B Moravek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Leslie C Appiah
- The Ohio State University/Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio;,James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia;,Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia;,University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Karen C Burns
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Veronica Gomez-Lobo
- Washington Hospital Center/Children’s National Medical Center/Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | | | | | - Monica M. Laronda
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital, Chicago, Illinois;,Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Lillian R Meacham
- Aflac Cancer Center/Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta/Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Erin E. Rowell
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital, Chicago, Illinois;,Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Andrew C Strine
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | - Leena Nahata
- The Ohio State University/Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pecker LH, Maher JY, Law JY, Beach MC, Lanzkron S, Christianson MS. Risks associated with fertility preservation for women with sickle cell anemia. Fertil Steril 2019; 110:720-731. [PMID: 30196969 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Revised: 05/14/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To highlight the risk of complications among women with sickle cell anemia (SCA) receiving fertility preservation treatment (FPT) before hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). DESIGN Single-center case series. SETTING Academic fertility center. PATIENT(S) Women aged 15-32 years with SCA undergoing FPT before HSCT. INTERVENTION(S) Retrospective, systematic review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) FPT modality, SCA complications during FPT. RESULT(S) Over an 8-year period (2009-2017), seven women with SCA ages 15-32 years (mean 28.5 years) underwent FPT with embryo cryopreservation (n = 1), oocyte cryopreservation (n = 4), and ovarian tissue cryopreservation (n = 2). The five women subjects who underwent oocyte or embryo cryopreservation were treated with an antagonist controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol and individualized gonadotropin dosing. The trigger medications included leuprolide acetate (n = 2), and human chorionic gonadotropin (n = 3). Most patients (n = 5) received a disease-modifying therapy for SCA (hydroxyurea or chronic transfusions) before FPT. Three patients experienced periprocedural SCA complications that included life-threatening respiratory failure, painful crisis requiring interruption of a stimulation cycle, and severe postharvest painful crisis. CONCLUSION(S) Women with SCA may choose to undergo diverse FPT strategies before HSCT and are at risk for serious SCA-related complications. Evidence-based strategies to mitigate SCA-related morbidity and to optimize fertility preservation outcomes are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia H Pecker
- Division of Pediatric Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Jacqueline Y Maher
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jennie Y Law
- Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mary Catherine Beach
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sophie Lanzkron
- Division of Adult Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mindy S Christianson
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Quinn GP, Sampson A, Campo-Engelstein L. Familial Discordance Regarding Fertility Preservation for a Transgender Teen: An Ethical Case Study. THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ETHICS 2018. [DOI: 10.1086/jce2018294261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
13
|
Smith BM, Duncan FE, Ataman L, Smith K, Quinn GP, Chang RJ, Finlayson C, Orwig K, Valli-Pulaski H, Moravek MB, Zelinski MB, Irene Su H, Vitek W, Smith JF, Jeruss JS, Gracia C, Coutifaris C, Shah D, Nahata L, Gomez-Lobo V, Appiah LC, Brannigan RE, Gillis V, Gradishar W, Javed A, Rhoton-Vlasak AS, Kondapalli LA, Neuber E, Ginsberg JP, Muller CH, Hirshfeld-Cytron J, Kutteh WH, Lindheim SR, Cherven B, Meacham LR, Rao P, Torno L, Sender LS, Vadaparampil ST, Skiles JL, Schafer-Kalkhoff T, Frias OJ, Byrne J, Westphal LM, Schust DJ, Klosky JL, McCracken KA, Ting A, Khan Z, Granberg C, Lockart B, Scoccia B, Laronda MM, Mersereau JE, Marsh C, Pavone ME, Woodruff TK. The National Physicians Cooperative: transforming fertility management in the cancer setting and beyond. Future Oncol 2018; 14:3059-3072. [PMID: 30474429 PMCID: PMC6331694 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2018-0278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Once unimaginable, fertility management is now a nationally established part of cancer care in institutions, from academic centers to community hospitals to private practices. Over the last two decades, advances in medicine and reproductive science have made it possible for men, women and children to be connected with an oncofertility specialist or offered fertility preservation soon after a cancer diagnosis. The Oncofertility Consortium's National Physicians Cooperative is a large-scale effort to engage physicians across disciplines – oncology, urology, obstetrics and gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, and behavioral health – in clinical and research activities to enable significant progress in providing fertility preservation options to children and adults. Here, we review the structure and function of the National Physicians Cooperative and identify next steps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigid M Smith
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Francesca E Duncan
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Lauren Ataman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Kristin Smith
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Gwendolyn P Quinn
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - R Jeffrey Chang
- Department of OB/GYN & Reproductive Sciences, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Courtney Finlayson
- Division of Endocrinology, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611 USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Kyle Orwig
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.,Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Hanna Valli-Pulaski
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.,Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Molly B Moravek
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Mary B Zelinski
- Division of Reproductive & Developmental Science, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, OR 97006, USA.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - H Irene Su
- Department of Reproductive Medicine & Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Wendy Vitek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
| | - James F Smith
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
| | - Jacqueline S Jeruss
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Clarisa Gracia
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Christos Coutifaris
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Divya Shah
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Leena Nahata
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine/Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.,Center for Behavioral Health, the Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA
| | - Veronica Gomez-Lobo
- Division of Pediatric & Adolescent Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC 20010, USA
| | - Leslie Coker Appiah
- The James Cancer Center, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Robert E Brannigan
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Valerie Gillis
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - William Gradishar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Asma Javed
- Department of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine, Division of Pediatric & Adolescent Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Alice S Rhoton-Vlasak
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | | | - Evelyn Neuber
- Center for Advanced Reproductive Services, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06032, USA
| | - Jill P Ginsberg
- Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Charles H Muller
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | | | - William H Kutteh
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.,Department of Surgery, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.,Fertility Associates of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38120, USA
| | - Steven R Lindheim
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wright State University, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH 45435, USA
| | - Brooke Cherven
- Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA 30342, USA
| | - Lillian R Meacham
- Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center & Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology & Division of Endocrinology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Pooja Rao
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - Lilibeth Torno
- Division of Oncology, CHOC Children's Hospital, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Leonard S Sender
- Division of Oncology, CHOC Children's Hospital, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Susan T Vadaparampil
- Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.,Department of Health Outcomes and Behaviors, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Jodi L Skiles
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.,Riley Hospital for Children at IU Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Tara Schafer-Kalkhoff
- Division of Pediatric & Adolescent Gynecology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - Oliva J Frias
- Division of Pediatric & Adolescent Gynecology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - Julia Byrne
- Children's Research Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Lynn M Westphal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Danny J Schust
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO 65212, USA
| | - James L Klosky
- Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center & Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology & Division of Endocrinology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30307, USA
| | - Kate A McCracken
- Section of Pediatric & Adolescent Gynecology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Alison Ting
- Division of Reproductive & Developmental Science, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, OR 97006, USA.,21st Century Medicine, Inc., Fontana, CA 92336, USA
| | - Zaraq Khan
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.,Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | - Barbara Lockart
- Division of Hematology, Oncology & Stem Cell Transplant, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.,Division of General Pediatric Surgery, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Bert Scoccia
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA
| | - Monica M Laronda
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.,Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Jennifer E Mersereau
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, University of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC 27599, USA
| | - Courtney Marsh
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Mary Ellen Pavone
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Teresa K Woodruff
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lau GA, Schaeffer AJ. Current standing and future directions in pediatric oncofertility: a narrative review. Transl Androl Urol 2018; 7:S276-S282. [PMID: 30159233 PMCID: PMC6087837 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.05.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2018] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
In this narrative review, we discuss the epidemiology and pathophysiology of infertility in childhood and adolescent cancer. We also review the current guidelines and ethical issues related to pediatric oncofertility. Finally, we present recent advances in basic science and translational research in pediatric fertility preservation (FP).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glen A Lau
- Division of Urology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
McDougall RJ, Gillam L, Delany C, Jayasinghe Y. Ethics of fertility preservation for prepubertal children: should clinicians offer procedures where efficacy is largely unproven? JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2018; 44:27-31. [PMID: 29084865 PMCID: PMC5749308 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-104042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2016] [Revised: 04/24/2017] [Accepted: 07/11/2017] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Young children with cancer are treated with interventions that can have a high risk of compromising their reproductive potential. 'Fertility preservation' for children who have not yet reached puberty involves surgically removing and cryopreserving reproductive tissue prior to treatment in the expectation that strategies for the use of this tissue will be developed in the future. Fertility preservation for prepubertal children is ethically complex because the techniques largely lack proven efficacy for this age group. There is professional difference of opinion about whether it is ethical to offer such 'experimental' procedures. The question addressed in this paper is: when, if ever, is it ethically justifiable to offer fertility preservation surgery to prepubertal children? We present the ethical concerns about prepubertal fertility preservation, drawing both on existing literature and our experience discussing this issue with clinicians in clinical ethics case consultations. We argue that offering the procedure is ethically justifiable in certain circumstances. For many children, the balance of benefits and burdens is such that the procedure is ethically permissible but not ethically required; when the procedure is medically safe, it is the parents' decision to make, with appropriate information and guidance from the treating clinicians. We suggest that clinical ethics support processes are necessary to assist clinicians to engage with the ethical complexity of prepubertal fertility preservation and describe the framework that has been integrated into the pathway of care for patients and families attending the Royal Children's Hospital in Melbourne, Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalind J McDougall
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Children's Bioethics Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lynn Gillam
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Children's Bioethics Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clare Delany
- Children's Bioethics Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yasmin Jayasinghe
- Paediatric and Adolescent Gynaecology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Saraf AJ, Nahata L. Fertility counseling and preservation: considerations for the pediatric endocrinologist. Transl Pediatr 2017; 6:313-322. [PMID: 29184812 PMCID: PMC5682384 DOI: 10.21037/tp.2017.07.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Infertility is a distressing consequence of numerous pediatric medical conditions and treatments. The field of pediatric fertility preservation has expanded rapidly over the past decade, and clinical guidelines emphasize the importance of discussing infertility risk and fertility preservation options with patients and families in a timely manner. Understanding the various mechanisms and presentations of fertility issues across diagnoses is imperative to provide counseling to patients and families, and identify individuals who may benefit from fertility preservation. The goals of this manuscript are to outline current fertility preservation options in pediatrics, review populations at-risk for infertility that are seen in pediatric endocrinology, and discuss other important issues related to fertility preservation including ethical considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J Saraf
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Leena Nahata
- Division of Endocrinology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.,Center for Biobehavioral Health, the Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Campo-Engelstein L, Chen D, Baratz AB, Johnson EK, Finlayson C. The Ethics of Fertility Preservation for Pediatric Patients With Differences (Disorders) of Sex Development. J Endocr Soc 2017; 1:638-645. [PMID: 28944319 PMCID: PMC5607629 DOI: 10.1210/js.2017-00110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Differences (disorders) of sex development are diverse conditions with variations in chromosomal, gonadal, and/or genital development. Fertility potential in this population is variable. Recent investigations into fertility potential in those previously thought to be infertile suggest that the majority may have fertility potential through experimental protocols. Fertility preservation may be more successful if pursued in childhood. As fertility research and techniques advance, it is important to carefully consider pediatric ethical issues specific to this population, including gonadectomy, consent/assent, experimental treatment and false hope, cost and insurance coverage, genetic transmission to offspring, and gender dysphoria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Campo-Engelstein
- Alden March Bioethics Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York 12208
| | - Diane Chen
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60611.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611
| | - Arlene B Baratz
- Division of Breast Imaging, West Penn Allegheny Health System, Temple University School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212
| | - Emilie K Johnson
- Division of Urology, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60611.,Department of Urology and Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611
| | - Courtney Finlayson
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60611.,Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Graber A. Autism, intellectual disability, and a challenge to our understanding of proxy consent. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2017; 20:229-236. [PMID: 27785587 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-016-9745-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
This paper focuses on a hypothetical case that represents an intervention request familiar to those who work with individuals with intellectual disability. Stacy has autism and moderate intellectual disability. Her parents have requested treatment for her hand flapping. Stacy is not competent to make her own treatment decisions; proxy consent is required. There are three primary justifications for proxy consent: the right to an open future, substituted judgment, and the best interest standard. The right to an open future justifies proxy consent on the assumption of future autonomy whereas substituted judgment justifies proxy consent via reference to past autonomy. Neither applies. Stacy has not been, nor will she be, competent to make her own treatment decisions. The best interest standard justifies proxy consent on the grounds of beneficence. It is unlikely that hand flapping harms Stacy. None of the three primary means of justifying proxy consent apply to Stacy's case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abraham Graber
- University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Should Parents Take Active Steps to Preserve Their Children’s Fertility? PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE CONTEXT OF NEUROSCIENCE AND GENETICS 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42834-5_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
20
|
Balkenende EME, Dondorp W, Ploem MC, Lambalk CB, Goddijn M, Mol F. A mother's gift of life: exploring the concerns and ethical aspects of fertility preservation for mother-to-daughter oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 2016; 32:2-6. [PMID: 27816926 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2016] [Revised: 09/27/2016] [Accepted: 10/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
With the introduction of oocyte vitrification, a special form of intergenerational intrafamilial medically assisted reproduction (IMAR) has now become feasible: fertility preservation for mother-to-daughter oocyte donation (FPMDD). For girls diagnosed with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), banking of their mothers' oocytes can preserve the option of having genetically related offspring. Since policy documents on IMAR do not discuss specific concerns raised by FPMDD, clinicians can feel at a loss for guidance with regard to handling these requests. Through a comparison of FPMDD with reproductive practices in which similar concerns were raised, proportionality of cryopreservation for self-use and pressure to use the oocytes in fertility preservation in minors, we argue that FPMDD can be acceptable under conditions. The paper ends with recommendations for handling FPMDD-requests, including different options for the legal construction of this form of oocyte donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M E Balkenende
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society Research schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M C Ploem
- Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C B Lambalk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Goddijn
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F Mol
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Voultsos P, Raikos N, Vasileiadis N, Spiliopoulou C, Tarlatzis B. Ethico-legal issues related to ovarian tissue transplantation. MEDICINE, SCIENCE, AND THE LAW 2016; 56:293-304. [PMID: 27381404 DOI: 10.1177/0025802416657685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT) is a promising experimental method which may soon become well-established. In cases of minor oncology, where patients' fertility is seriously threatened by treatment, it may be applied as a unique fertility preservation option. OTT has a dual nature ('organ' and 'gamete'). Many stakeholders are involved, including donor, recipient, child, health-care providers and society at large. There is considerable uncertainty about the long-term consequences of the application of OTT and OT cryopreservation (OTC). Thus, application of OTT gives rise to a number of very different ethico-legal issues and dilemmas which are hard to solve coherently through a principlism-based bioethical approach. This study focuses on such dilemmas and attempts to review them. The role of virtue ethics, which may be combined with principlism, is essential to solve such dilemmas coherently and reasonably. Dealing with conflicts of ethical principles equivalent between them, or moral dilemmas without available answers and mind-sharing in a difficult interpersonal process of decision making, requires a virtue-based ethical approach. Besides, ethico-legal issues related to OTC/OTT are complex issues requiring a multidisciplinary approach (ethical considerations, medical, psychological and social evaluations etc.). We stress the crucial role of multidisciplinary Ethics Committee which is considered indispensable for each reproductive health-care unit practicing OTC/OTT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Voultsos
- 1 Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - N Raikos
- 1 Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - N Vasileiadis
- 1 Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Ch Spiliopoulou
- 2 Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - B Tarlatzis
- 3 Infertility and IVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cutas D, Hens K. Preserving children's fertility: two tales about children's right to an open future and the margins of parental obligations. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2015; 18:253-60. [PMID: 25189425 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-014-9596-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
The sources, extent and margins of parental obligations in taking decisions regarding their children's medical care are subjects of ongoing debates. Balancing children's immediate welfare with keeping their future open is a delicate task. In this paper, we briefly present two examples of situations in which parents may be confronted with the choice of whether to authorise or demand non-therapeutic interventions on their children for the purpose of fertility preservation. The first example is that of children facing cancer treatment, and the second of children with Klinefelter syndrome. We argue that, whereas decisions of whether to preserve fertility may be prima facie within the limits of parental discretion, the right to an open future does not straightforwardly put parents under an obligation to take actions that would detect or relieve future infertility in their children-and indeed in some cases taking such actions is problematic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Cutas
- Department of Historical, Philosophical and Religious Studies, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden,
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
As medical advances improve survival, reduce disease-related morbidity, and improve quality of life, reproductive issues will take higher priority in the sickle cell disease (SCD) community. A wide variety of topics are addressed in this chapter, including fertility, gonadal failure, erectile dysfunction, and menstrual issues in SCD. Etiologies of impaired male fertility are multifactorial and include hypogonadism, erectile dysfunction, sperm abnormalities, and complications of medical therapies. Much less is known about the prevalence and etiology of infertility in women with SCD. Other reproductive issues in women included in this review are pain and the menstrual cycle, contraception, and preconception counseling. Finally, long-term therapies for SCD and their impact on fertility are presented. Transfusional iron overload and gonadal failure are addressed, followed by options for fertility preservation after stem cell transplantation. Focus is placed on hydroxyurea therapy given its benefits and increasing use in SCD. The impact of this agent on spermatogenesis, azoospermia, and the developing fetus is discussed.
Collapse
|
24
|
Smith-Whitley K. Reproductive issues in sickle cell disease. HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2014; 2014:418-24. [PMID: 25696888 DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2014.1.418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
As medical advances improve survival, reduce disease-related morbidity, and improve quality of life, reproductive issues will take higher priority in the sickle cell disease (SCD) community. A wide variety of topics are addressed in this chapter, including fertility, gonadal failure, erectile dysfunction, and menstrual issues in SCD. Etiologies of impaired male fertility are multifactorial and include hypogonadism, erectile dysfunction, sperm abnormalities, and complications of medical therapies. Much less is known about the prevalence and etiology of infertility in women with SCD. Other reproductive issues in women included in this review are pain and the menstrual cycle, contraception, and preconception counseling. Finally, long-term therapies for SCD and their impact on fertility are presented. Transfusional iron overload and gonadal failure are addressed, followed by options for fertility preservation after stem cell transplantation. Focus is placed on hydroxyurea therapy given its benefits and increasing use in SCD. The impact of this agent on spermatogenesis, azoospermia, and the developing fetus is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Smith-Whitley
- Division of Hematology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Preserving children's fertility: two tales about children's right to an open future and the margins of parental obligations. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2014. [PMID: 25189425 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-014-9596-3.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/29/2022]
Abstract
The sources, extent and margins of parental obligations in taking decisions regarding their children's medical care are subjects of ongoing debates. Balancing children's immediate welfare with keeping their future open is a delicate task. In this paper, we briefly present two examples of situations in which parents may be confronted with the choice of whether to authorise or demand non-therapeutic interventions on their children for the purpose of fertility preservation. The first example is that of children facing cancer treatment, and the second of children with Klinefelter syndrome. We argue that, whereas decisions of whether to preserve fertility may be prima facie within the limits of parental discretion, the right to an open future does not straightforwardly put parents under an obligation to take actions that would detect or relieve future infertility in their children-and indeed in some cases taking such actions is problematic.
Collapse
|
26
|
Richie C. Global Health Care Justice, Delivery Doctors and Assisted Reproduction: Taking a Note From Catholic Social Teachings. Dev World Bioeth 2014; 15:179-90. [PMID: 24750593 DOI: 10.1111/dewb.12060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
This article will examine the Catholic concept of global justice within a health care framework as it relates to women's needs for delivery doctors in the developing world and women's demands for assisted reproduction in the developed world. I will first discuss justice as a theory, situating it within Catholic social teachings. The Catholic perspective on global justice in health care demands that everyone have access to basic needs before elective treatments are offered to the wealthy. After exploring specific discrepancies in global health care justice, I will point to the need for delivery doctors in the developing world to provide basic assistance to women who hazard many pregnancies as a priority before offering assisted reproduction to women in the developed world. The wide disparities between maternal health in the developing world and elective fertility treatments in the developed world are clearly unjust within Catholic social teachings. I conclude this article by offering policy suggestions for moving closer to health care justice via doctor distribution.
Collapse
|
27
|
Clinical guide to fertility preservation in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2014; 49:477-84. [PMID: 24419521 DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2013.211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2013] [Revised: 09/27/2013] [Accepted: 10/08/2013] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
With broadening indications, more options for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and improvement in survival, the number of long-term HCT survivors is expected to increase steadily. Infertility is a frequent problem that long-term HCT survivors and their partners face and it can negatively impact on the quality of life. The most optimal time to address fertility issues is before the onset of therapy for the underlying disease; however, fertility preservation should also be addressed before HCT in all children and patients of reproductive age, with referral to a reproductive specialist for patients interested in fertility preservation. In vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation and ovarian tissue banking are acceptable methods for fertility preservation in adult women/pubertal females. Sperm banking is the preferred method for adult men/pubertal males. Frequent barriers to fertility preservation in HCT recipients may include the perception of lack of time to preserve fertility given an urgency to move ahead with transplant, lack of patient-physician discussion because of several factors (for example, time constraints, lack of knowledge), inadequate access to reproductive specialists, and costs and lack of insurance coverage for fertility preservation. There is a need to raise awareness in the medical community about fertility preservation in HCT recipients.
Collapse
|
28
|
Rodriguez SB, Campo-Engelstein L, Clayman ML, Knapp C, Quinn G, Zoloth L, Emanuel L. Pathways toward the future: points to consider for oncofertility oversight. J Cancer Surviv 2013; 7:140-5. [PMID: 23229088 PMCID: PMC3568233 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-012-0255-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2012] [Accepted: 11/09/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In September 2007, Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine received a $21.1 million dollar, 5-year grant from the National Institutes of Health to fund the Oncofertility Consortium (OFC). Over the course of the grant, those engaged with the psychological, legal, social, and ethical issues arising from oncofertility provided recommendations to the OFC. The inclusion of serious, real-time consideration of ethical issues as a funded focus of the grant and the work of scholars in law, bioethics, and economics was a key part of the process of research. Now that this grant has ended, this commentary points to some of the issues that came forward during the 5 years of this project. Because of the emerging status of oncofertility, these issues are ones that need continued discussion and clarification, prompting our call for an oversight mechanism to provide guidance for how this technology should proceed. METHODS An initial draft of this commentary arose from notes taken during a small colloquium held to discuss the oversight of oncofertility following the conclusion of the grant. This colloquium occurred in the fall of 2011. Using these notes as a starting point, the draft was then sent to other researchers who had been involved with the OFC in considering the psychological, legal, social, and ethical issues related to fertility preservation for cancer patients during the course of the grant. Finally, this commentary was further framed by the authors' review of existing published and gray literature regarding issues concerning fertility preservation for cancer patients. RESULTS We provide several points to consider and then offer two suggestions for an oversight mechanism for research as it continues. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS We assert the need not just for guidelines for the clinical practice of oncofertility, but also for oversight of the scope of this emerging technology because of its profound implications. We recognize that many long to a have a child and form a family and that, for some, cancer interrupts this path. With the conclusion of this grant, we call for the creation of a permanent oversight mechanism to thoughtfully and earnestly consider how to guide oncofertility to allow this emerging technology to be carefully considered as it develops. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS The circumstances in which fertility preservation should be discussed and the patients for whom fertility preservation would be most suitable are important guideline issues for people who survive cancer and for their treatment team. Oversight of the field of oncofertility would strengthen the rights of cancer patients and help protect them from abuses as well as alert health care professionals to their correlative duties to these vulnerable patients and families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah B. Rodriguez
- Research Assistant Professor, Medical Humanities + Bioethics Program, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, 312-503-2887
| | - Lisa Campo-Engelstein
- Assistant Professor, Alden March Bioethics Institute & Department of OBGYN, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Avenue, MC 153, Albany, New York 12208, P: 518.262.0239, F: 518.262.6856
| | - Marla L. Clayman
- Assistant Professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 251 East Huron Street, Galter Suite 3-150, Chicago, IL 60611, (312) 926-6895
| | - Caprice Knapp
- Associate Professor, Department of Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1329 SW 16th Street, Room 5130, Gainesville, Florida 32610, (352) 265-2517, (352) 265-7299 (Fax)
| | | | - Laurie Zoloth
- McCormick Professor 2009, Professor of Medical Humanities and Bioethics, Professor of Religious Studies, Director, The Brady Program in Ethics and Public Life, Crowe Hall 4140, Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Feinberg College of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 847-644 8807 cell, 847-491-2615 office
| | - Linda Emanuel
- Director of the Buehler Center on Aging, 750 North Lake Shore Drive Suite 601, Chicago, IL 60611, 312-503-3087, 312-503-5868 (fax)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rogers A. Restricting access to reproductive uses of minors' stored gonadal tissue. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2013; 13:41-42. [PMID: 23428038 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.760681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alix Rogers
- Yale Law School, 127 Wall Street New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wasserman D, Asch A. Reproductive medicine and Turner syndrome: ethical issues. Fertil Steril 2012; 98:792-6. [PMID: 23020911 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2012] [Revised: 08/17/2012] [Accepted: 08/20/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
This article discusses the ethical issues raised by the medical responses to Turner syndrome (TS). It explores the issues and challenges faced by women with Turner, and by prospective parents of a child with Turner. It focuses on four issues: the use of GH to increase height; the use of third-party oocytes to enable women with Turner to become pregnant; the parental decision to remove and cryopreserve ovarian tissue from a child with Turner; and the termination of fetuses diagnosed with Turner. Many of the challenges associated with TS are directly or indirectly related to social attitudes and practices, from harsh teasing in school to health professionals' assumption that a woman will abort a fetus diagnosed with Turner. All the interventions designed to alleviate the difficulties faced by women with TS should be employed with caution, in part because they raise significant concerns about risk and consent; in part because they offer a medical response to problems that are to some extent social.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Wasserman
- Center for Ethics at Yeshiva University, New York, New York 10033, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jayne C Lucke
- The University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ungar LDJ, Ladd JM. The ethical status of prophylactic interventions in children: ovarian tissue cryopreservation and vaccination. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2012; 12:50-52. [PMID: 22650465 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.671899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Leo D J Ungar
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford, CA, 94305 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Crozier GKD, Michaud B. Juvenile ovarian tissue cryopreservation and social justice: an imperative to broaden the discussion. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2012; 12:46-47. [PMID: 22650463 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.671897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
|
34
|
|
35
|
Affiliation(s)
- Thom Brooks
- Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
McGowan ML, Redding J. Reframing the justice implications of preserving the right to future children. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2012; 12:53-55. [PMID: 22650467 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.672622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
|