Repriming by PrimPol is critical for DNA replication restart downstream of lesions and chain-terminating nucleosides

Pold4 subunit of replicative polymerase δ promotes fork slowing at broken templates

Single-strand breaks (SSBs) are the most frequent type of lesion, and replication across such lesions leads to double-strand breaks (DSBs). DSBs that arise during replication are repaired by homologous recombination (HR) and are suppressed by fork reversal. Poly[ADP-ribose] polymerase I (PARP1) and the proofreading exonuclease activity of replicative polymerase ε (Polε) are required for fork reversal when leading strand replication encounters SSBs. However, the mechanism underlying fork reversal at the SSB during lagging-strand replication remains elusive. We here demonstrate that the Pold4 subunit of replicative polymerase δ (Polδ) plays a role in promoting fork reversal during lagging strand replication on a broken template. POLD4-/- cells exhibited heightened sensitivity to camptothecin (CPT) but not to other DNA-damaging agents compared to wild-type cells. This selective CPT sensitivity in POLD4-/- cells suggests that Pold4 suppresses DSBs during replication, as CPT induces significant SSBs during replication, which subsequently lead to DSBs. To explore the functional interactions among Pold4, Polε exonuclease, and PARP1 in DSB suppression, we generated PARP1-/-, POLD4-/-, Polε exonuclease-deficient POLE1exo-/-, PARP1-/-/POLD4-/-, and POLD4-/-/POLE1exo-/- cells. These epistasis analyses showed that Pold4 is involved in the PARP1-Polε exonuclease-mediated fork reversal following CPT treatment. These results suggest that Pold4 aids in fork reversal when lagging strand replication stalls on a broken template. In conclusion, the Pold4 subunit of Polδ has roles in the PARP1-Polε exonuclease-mediated fork reversal, contributing to the suppression of DSBs.

EXO1 and DNA2-mediated ssDNA gap expansion is essential for ATR activation and to maintain viability in BRCA1-deficient cells

DNA replication faces challenges from DNA lesions originated from endogenous or exogenous sources of stress, leading to the accumulation of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) that triggers the activation of the ATR checkpoint response. To complete genome replication in the presence of damaged DNA, cells employ DNA damage tolerance mechanisms that operate not only at stalled replication forks but also at ssDNA gaps originated by repriming of DNA synthesis downstream of lesions. Here, we demonstrate that human cells accumulate post-replicative ssDNA gaps following replicative stress induction. These gaps, initiated by PrimPol repriming and expanded by the long-range resection factors EXO1 and DNA2, constitute the principal origin of the ssDNA signal responsible for ATR activation upon replication stress, in contrast to stalled forks. Strikingly, the loss of EXO1 or DNA2 results in synthetic lethality when combined with BRCA1 deficiency, but not BRCA2. This phenomenon aligns with the observation that BRCA1 alone contributes to the expansion of ssDNA gaps. Remarkably, BRCA1-deficient cells become addicted to the overexpression of EXO1, DNA2 or BLM. This dependence on long-range resection unveils a new vulnerability of BRCA1-mutant tumors, shedding light on potential therapeutic targets for these cancers.

Dominant roles of BRCA1 in cellular tolerance to a chain-terminating nucleoside analog, alovudine

Alovudine is a chain-terminating nucleoside analog (CTNA) that is frequently used as an antiviral and anticancer agent. Generally, CTNAs inhibit DNA replication after their incorporation into nascent DNA during DNA synthesis by suppressing subsequent polymerization, which restricts the proliferation of viruses and cancer cells. Alovudine is a thymidine analog used as an antiviral drug. However, the mechanisms underlying the removal of alovudine and DNA damage tolerance pathways involved in cellular resistance to alovudine remain unclear. Here, we explored the DNA damage tolerance pathways responsible for cellular tolerance to alovudine and found that BRCA1-deficient cells exhibited the highest sensitivity to alovudine. Moreover, alovudine interfered with DNA replication in two distinct mechanisms: first: alovudine incorporated at the end of nascent DNA interfered with subsequent DNA synthesis; second: DNA replication stalled on the alovudine-incorporated template strand. Additionally, BRCA1 facilitated the removal of the incorporated alovudine from nascent DNA, and BRCA1-mediated homologous recombination (HR) contributed to the progressive replication on the alovudine-incorporated template. Thus, we have elucidated the previously unappreciated mechanism of alovudine-mediated inhibition of DNA replication and the role of BRCA1 in cellular tolerance to alovudine.

PrimPol Variant V102A with Altered Primase and Polymerase Activities

PrimPol is a human DNA primase-polymerase which restarts DNA synthesis beyond DNA lesions and non-B DNA structures blocking replication. Disfunction of PrimPol in cells leads to slowing of DNA replication rates in mitochondria and nucleus, accumulation of chromosome aberrations, cell cycle delay, and elevated sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. A defective PrimPol has been suggested to be associated with the development of ophthalmic diseases, elevated mitochondrial toxicity of antiviral drugs and increased cell resistance to chemotherapy. Here, we describe a rare missense PrimPol variant V102A with altered biochemical properties identified in patients suffering from ovarian and cervical cancer. The Val102 to Ala substitution dramatically reduced both the primase and DNA polymerase activities of PrimPol as well as specifically decreased its ability to incorporate ribonucleotides. Structural analysis indicates that the V102A substitution can destabilize the hydrophobic pocket adjacent to the active site, affecting dNTP binding and catalysis.

Exploring RAD18-dependent replication of damaged DNA and discontinuities: A collection of advanced tools

DNA damage tolerance (DDT) pathways mitigate the effects of DNA damage during replication by rescuing the replication fork stalled at a DNA lesion or other barriers and also repair discontinuities left in the newly replicated DNA. From yeast to mammalian cells, RAD18-regulated translesion synthesis (TLS) and template switching (TS) represent the dominant pathways of DDT. Monoubiquitylation of the polymerase sliding clamp PCNA by HRAD6A-B/RAD18, an E2/E3 protein pair, enables the recruitment of specialized TLS polymerases that can insert nucleotides opposite damaged template bases. Alternatively, the subsequent polyubiquitylation of monoubiquitin-PCNA by Ubc13-Mms2 (E2) and HLTF or SHPRH (E3) can lead to the switching of the synthesis from the damaged template to the undamaged newly synthesized sister strand to facilitate synthesis past the lesion. When immediate TLS or TS cannot occur, gaps may remain in the newly synthesized strand, partly due to the repriming activity of the PRIMPOL primase, which can be filled during the later phases of the cell cycle. The first part of this review will summarize the current knowledge about RAD18-dependent DDT pathways, while the second part will offer a molecular toolkit for the identification and characterization of the cellular functions of a DDT protein. In particular, we will focus on advanced techniques that can reveal single-stranded and double-stranded DNA gaps and their repair at the single-cell level as well as monitor the progression of single replication forks, such as the specific versions of the DNA fiber and comet assays. This collection of methods may serve as a powerful molecular toolkit to monitor the metabolism of gaps, detect the contribution of relevant pathways and molecular players, as well as characterize the effectiveness of potential inhibitors.

PRIMPOL ensures robust handoff between on-the-fly and post-replicative DNA lesion bypass

The primase/polymerase PRIMPOL restarts DNA synthesis when replication is arrested by template impediments. However, we do not have a comprehensive view of how PRIMPOL-dependent repriming integrates with the main pathways of damage tolerance, REV1-dependent 'on-the-fly' lesion bypass at the fork and PCNA ubiquitination-dependent post-replicative gap filling. Guided by genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screens to survey the genetic interactions of PRIMPOL in a non-transformed and p53-proficient human cell line, we find that PRIMPOL is needed for cell survival following loss of the Y-family polymerases REV1 and POLη in a lesion-dependent manner, while it plays a broader role in promoting survival of cells lacking PCNA K164-dependent post-replicative gap filling. Thus, while REV1- and PCNA K164R-bypass provide two layers of protection to ensure effective damage tolerance, PRIMPOL is required to maximise the effectiveness of the interaction between them. We propose this is through the restriction of post-replicative gap length provided by PRIMPOL-dependent repriming.

DNA replication and replication stress response in the context of nuclear architecture

The DNA replication process needs to be coordinated with other DNA metabolism transactions and must eventually extend to the full genome, regardless of chromatin status, gene expression, secondary structures and DNA lesions. Completeness and accuracy of DNA replication are crucial to maintain genome integrity, limiting transformation in normal cells and offering targeting opportunities for proliferating cancer cells. DNA replication is thus tightly coordinated with chromatin dynamics and 3D genome architecture, and we are only beginning to understand the underlying molecular mechanisms. While much has recently been discovered on how DNA replication initiation is organised and modulated in different genomic regions and nuclear territories-the so-called "DNA replication program"-we know much less on how the elongation of ongoing replication forks and particularly the response to replication obstacles is affected by the local nuclear organisation. Also, it is still elusive how specific components of nuclear architecture participate in the replication stress response. Here, we review known mechanisms and factors orchestrating replication initiation, and replication fork progression upon stress, focusing on recent evidence linking genome organisation and nuclear architecture with the cellular responses to replication interference, and highlighting open questions and future challenges to explore this exciting new avenue of research.

Coordination of Primer Initiation Within the Catalytic Domain of Human PrimPol

To facilitate the eukaryotic repriming pathway of DNA damage tolerance, PrimPol synthesises de novo oligonucleotide primers downstream of polymerase-stalling obstacles. These primers enable replicative polymerases to resume synthesis and ensure the timely completion of DNA replication. Initiating synthesis de novo requires the coordination of single-stranded DNA, initiating nucleotides, and metal ions within PrimPol's active site to catalyze the formation of the first phosphodiester bond. Here we examine the interactions between human PrimPol's catalytic domain, nucleotides, and DNA template during each of the various catalytic steps to determine the 'choreography' of primer synthesis, where substrates bind in an ordered manner. Our findings show that the ability of PrimPol to conduct de novo primer synthesis is underpinned by a network of stabilising interactions between the enzyme, template, and nucleotides, as we previously observed for related primase CRISPR-Associated Prim-Pol (CAPP). Together, these findings establish a detailed model for the initiation of DNA synthesis by human PrimPol, which appears highly conserved.

The proofreading exonuclease of leading-strand DNA polymerase epsilon prevents replication fork collapse at broken template strands

Leading-strand DNA replication by polymerase epsilon (Polϵ) across single-strand breaks (SSBs) causes single-ended double-strand breaks (seDSBs), which are repaired via homology-directed repair (HDR) and suppressed by fork reversal (FR). Although previous studies identified many molecules required for hydroxyurea-induced FR, FR at seDSBs is poorly understood. Here, we identified molecules that specifically mediate FR at seDSBs. Because FR at seDSBs requires poly(ADP ribose)polymerase 1 (PARP1), we hypothesized that seDSB/FR-associated molecules would increase tolerance to camptothecin (CPT) but not the PARP inhibitor olaparib, even though both anti-cancer agents generate seDSBs. Indeed, we uncovered that Polϵ exonuclease and CTF18, a Polϵ cofactor, increased tolerance to CPT but not olaparib. To explore potential functional interactions between Polϵ exonuclease, CTF18, and PARP1, we created exonuclease-deficient POLE1exo-/-, CTF18-/-, PARP1-/-, CTF18-/-/POLE1exo-/-, PARP1-/-/POLE1exo-/-, and CTF18-/-/PARP1-/- cells. Epistasis analysis indicated that Polϵ exonuclease and CTF18 were interdependent and required PARP1 for CPT tolerance. Remarkably, POLE1exo-/- and HDR-deficient BRCA1-/- cells exhibited similar CPT sensitivity. Moreover, combining POLE1exo-/- with BRCA1-/- mutations synergistically increased CPT sensitivity. In conclusion, the newly identified PARP1-CTF18-Polϵ exonuclease axis and HDR act independently to prevent fork collapse at seDSBs. Olaparib inhibits this axis, explaining the pronounced cytotoxic effects of olaparib on HDR-deficient cells.

The Response of the Replication Apparatus to Leading Template Strand Blocks

Duplication of the genome requires the replication apparatus to overcome a variety of impediments, including covalent DNA adducts, the most challenging of which is on the leading template strand. Replisomes consist of two functional units, a helicase to unwind DNA and polymerases to synthesize it. The helicase is a multi-protein complex that encircles the leading template strand and makes the first contact with a leading strand adduct. The size of the channel in the helicase would appear to preclude transit by large adducts such as DNA: protein complexes (DPC). Here we discuss some of the extensively studied pathways that support replication restart after replisome encounters with leading template strand adducts. We also call attention to recent work that highlights the tolerance of the helicase for adducts ostensibly too large to pass through the central channel.

Response of PRIMPOL-Knockout Human Lung Adenocarcinoma A549 Cells to Genotoxic Stress

Human DNA primase/polymerase PrimPol synthesizes DNA primers de novo after replication fork stalling at the sites of DNA damage, thus contributing to the DNA damage tolerance. The role of PrimPol in response to the different types of DNA damage is poorly understood. We knocked out the PRIMPOL gene in the lung carcinoma A549 cell line and characterized the response of the obtained cells to the DNA damage caused by hydrogen peroxide, methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), cisplatin, bleomycin, and ionizing radiation. The PRIMPOL knockout reduced the number of proliferating cells and cells in the G2 phase after treatment with MMS and caused a more pronounced delay of the S phase in the cisplatin-treated cells. Ionizing radiation at a dose of 10 Gy significantly increased the content of apoptotic cells among the PRIMPOL-deficient cells, while the proportion of cells undergoing necroptosis increased in both parental and knockout cells at any radiation dose. The viability of PRIMPOL-deficient cells upon the hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress increased compared to the control cells, as determined by the methyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay. The obtained data indicate the involvement of PRIMPOL in the modulation of adaptive cell response to various types of genotoxic stress.

The plant organellar primase-helicase directs template recognition and primosome assembly via its zinc finger domain

BACKGROUND

The mechanisms and regulation for DNA replication in plant organelles are largely unknown, as few proteins involved in replisome assembly have been biochemically studied. A primase-helicase dubbed Twinkle (T7 gp4-like protein with intramitochondrial nucleoid localization) unwinds double-stranded DNA in metazoan mitochondria and plant organelles. Twinkle in plants is a bifunctional enzyme with an active primase module. This contrast with animal Twinkle in which the primase module is inactive. The organellar primase-helicase of Arabidopsis thaliana (AtTwinkle) harbors a primase module (AtPrimase) that consists of an RNA polymerase domain (RPD) and a Zn + + finger domain (ZFD).

RESULTS

Herein, we investigate the mechanisms by which AtTwinkle recognizes its templating sequence and how primer synthesis and coupling to the organellar DNA polymerases occurs. Biochemical data show that the ZFD of the AtPrimase module is responsible for template recognition, and this recognition is achieved by residues N163, R166, and K168. The role of the ZFD in template recognition was also corroborated by swapping the RPDs of bacteriophage T7 primase and AtPrimase with their respective ZFDs. A chimeric primase harboring the ZFD of T7 primase and the RPD of AtPrimase synthesizes ribonucleotides from the T7 primase recognition sequence and conversely, a chimeric primase harboring the ZFD of AtPrimase and the RPD of T7 primase synthesizes ribonucleotides from the AtPrimase recognition sequence. A chimera harboring the RPDs of bacteriophage T7 and the ZBD of AtTwinkle efficiently synthesizes primers for the plant organellar DNA polymerase.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the ZFD is responsible for recognizing a single-stranded sequence and for primer hand-off into the organellar DNA polymerases active site. The primase activity of plant Twinkle is consistent with phylogeny-based reconstructions that concluded that Twinkle´s last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA) was an enzyme with primase and helicase activities. In plants, the primase domain is active, whereas the primase activity was lost in metazoans. Our data supports the notion that AtTwinkle synthesizes primers at the lagging-strand of the organellar replication fork.

The role of catalytic and regulatory domains of human PrimPol in DNA binding and synthesis

Human PrimPol possesses DNA primase and DNA polymerase activities and restarts stalled replication forks protecting cells against DNA damage in nuclei and mitochondria. The zinc-binding motif (ZnFn) of the C-terminal domain (CTD) of PrimPol is required for DNA primase activity but the mechanism is not clear. In this work, we biochemically demonstrate that PrimPol initiates de novo DNA synthesis in cis-orientation, when the N-terminal catalytic domain (NTD) and the CTD of the same molecule cooperate for substrates binding and catalysis. The modeling studies revealed that PrimPol uses a similar mode of initiating NTP coordination as the human primase. The ZnFn motif residue Arg417 is required for binding the 5'-triphosphate group that stabilizes the PrimPol complex with a DNA template-primer. We found that the NTD alone is able to initiate DNA synthesis, and the CTD stimulates the primase activity of NTD. The regulatory role of the RPA-binding motif in the modulation of PrimPol binding to DNA is also demonstrated.

Regulation of Human DNA Primase-Polymerase PrimPol

Transmission of genetic information depends on successful completion of DNA replication. Genomic DNA is subjected to damage on a daily basis. DNA lesions create obstacles for DNA polymerases and can lead to the replication blockage, formation of DNA breaks, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis. Cells have evolutionary adapted to DNA damage by developing mechanisms allowing elimination of lesions prior to DNA replication (DNA repair) and helping to bypass lesions during DNA synthesis (DNA damage tolerance). The second group of mechanisms includes the restart of DNA synthesis at the sites of DNA damage by DNA primase-polymerase PrimPol. Human PrimPol was described in 2013. The properties and functions of this enzyme have been extensively studied in recent years, but very little is known about the regulation of PrimPol and association between the enzyme dysfunction and diseases. In this review, we described the mechanisms of human PrimPol regulation in the context of DNA replication, discussed in detail interactions of PrimPol with other proteins, and proposed possible pathways for the regulation of human PrimPol activity. The article also addresses the association of PrimPol dysfunction with human diseases.

Primase-polymerases: how to make a primer from scratch

To pass on genetic information to the next generation, cells must faithfully replicate their genomes to provide copies for each daughter cell. To synthesise these duplicates, cells employ specialised enzymes called DNA polymerases, which rapidly and accurately replicate nucleic acid polymers. However, most polymerases lack the ability to directly initiate DNA synthesis and required specialised replicases called primases to make short polynucleotide primers, from which they then extend. Replicative primases (eukaryotes and archaea) belong to a functionally diverse enzyme superfamily known as Primase-Polymerases (Prim-Pols), with orthologues present throughout all domains of life. Characterised by a conserved catalytic Prim-Pol domain, these enzymes have evolved various roles in DNA metabolism, including DNA replication, repair, and damage tolerance. Many of these biological roles are fundamentally underpinned by the ability of Prim-Pols to generate primers de novo. This review examines our current understanding of the catalytic mechanisms utilised by Prim-Pols to initiate primer synthesis.

The Adaptive Mechanisms and Checkpoint Responses to a Stressed DNA Replication Fork

DNA replication is a tightly controlled process that ensures the faithful duplication of the genome. However, DNA damage arising from both endogenous and exogenous assaults gives rise to DNA replication stress associated with replication fork slowing or stalling. Therefore, protecting the stressed fork while prompting its recovery to complete DNA replication is critical for safeguarding genomic integrity and cell survival. Specifically, the plasticity of the replication fork in engaging distinct DNA damage tolerance mechanisms, including fork reversal, repriming, and translesion DNA synthesis, enables cells to overcome a variety of replication obstacles. Furthermore, stretches of single-stranded DNA generated upon fork stalling trigger the activation of the ATR kinase, which coordinates the cellular responses to replication stress by stabilizing the replication fork, promoting DNA repair, and controlling cell cycle and replication origin firing. Deregulation of the ATR checkpoint and aberrant levels of chronic replication stress is a common characteristic of cancer and a point of vulnerability being exploited in cancer therapy. Here, we discuss the various adaptive responses of a replication fork to replication stress and the roles of ATR signaling that bring fork stabilization mechanisms together. We also review how this knowledge is being harnessed for the development of checkpoint inhibitors to trigger the replication catastrophe of cancer cells.

CTF18-RFC contributes to cellular tolerance against chain-terminating nucleoside analogs (CTNAs) in cooperation with proofreading exonuclease activity of DNA polymerase ε

Chemotherapeutic nucleoside analogs, such as cytarabine (Ara-C), are incorporated into genomic DNA during replication. Incorporated Ara-CMP (Ara-cytidine monophosphate) serves as a chain terminator and inhibits DNA synthesis by replicative polymerase epsilon (Polε). The proofreading exonuclease activity of Polε removes the misincorporated Ara-CMP, thereby contributing to the cellular tolerance to Ara-C. Purified Polε performs proofreading, and it is generally believed that proofreading in vivo does not need additional factors. In this study, we demonstrated that the proofreading by Polε in vivo requires CTF18, a component of the leading-strand replisome. We found that loss of CTF18 in chicken DT40 cells and human TK6 cells results in hypersensitivity to Ara-C, indicating the conserved function of CTF18 in the cellular tolerance of Ara-C. Strikingly, we found that proofreading-deficient POLE1^D269A/-, CTF18^-/-, and POLE1^D269A/-/CTF18^-/- cells showed indistinguishable phenotypes, including the extent of hypersensitivity to Ara-C and decreased replication rate with Ara-C. This observed epistatic relationship between POLE1^D269A/- and CTF18^-/- suggests that they are interdependent in removing mis-incorporated Ara-CMP from the 3' end of primers. Mechanistically, we found that CTF18^-/- cells have reduced levels of chromatin-bound Polε upon Ara-C treatment, suggesting that CTF18 contributes to the tethering of Polε on fork at the stalled end and thereby facilitating the removal of inserted Ara-C. Collectively, these data reveal the previously unappreciated role of CTF18 in Polε-exonuclease-mediated maintenance of the replication fork upon Ara-C incorporation.

Assessment of DNA fibers to track replication dynamics

DNA replication is a complex and tightly regulated process that must proceed accurately and completely if the cell is to faithfully transmit genetic material to its progeny. Organisms have thus evolved complex mechanisms to deal with the myriad exogenous and endogenous sources of replication impediments to which the cell is subject. These mechanisms are of particular relevance to cancer biology, given that such "replication stress" frequently foreshadows genome instability during cancer pathogenesis, and that many traditional chemotherapies and a number of precision medicines function by interfering with the progress of DNA replication. Visualization of the progress and dynamics of DNA replication in living cells was historically a major challenge, neatly surmounted by the development of DNA fiber assays that utilize the fluorescent detection of halogenated nucleotides to track replication forks at single-molecule resolution. This methodology has been widely applied to study the dynamics of unperturbed DNA replication, as well as the cellular responses to various replication stress scenarios. In recent years, subtle modifications to DNA fiber assays have facilitated assessment of the stability of nascent DNA at stalled replication forks, as well as the detection of single-stranded DNA gaps and their subsequent filling by error-prone polymerases. Here, we present and discuss several iterations of the fiber assay and suggest methodologies for the analysis of the data obtained.

Leveraging the replication stress response to optimize cancer therapy

High-fidelity DNA replication is critical for the faithful transmission of genetic information to daughter cells. Following genotoxic stress, specialized DNA damage tolerance pathways are activated to ensure replication fork progression. These pathways include translesion DNA synthesis, template switching and repriming. In this Review, we describe how DNA damage tolerance pathways impact genome stability, their connection with tumorigenesis and their effects on cancer therapy response. We discuss recent findings that single-strand DNA gap accumulation impacts chemoresponse and explore a growing body of evidence that suggests that different DNA damage tolerance factors, including translesion synthesis polymerases, template switching proteins and enzymes affecting single-stranded DNA gaps, represent useful cancer targets. We further outline how the consequences of DNA damage tolerance mechanisms could inform the discovery of new biomarkers to refine cancer therapies.

Deletion of the primase-polymerases encoding gene, located in a mobile element in Thermus thermophilus HB27, leads to loss of function mutation of addAB genes

DNA primase-polymerases (Ppol) have been shown to play active roles in DNA repair and damage tolerance, both in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. The ancestral thermophilic bacterium Thermus thermophilus strain HB27 encodes a Ppol protein among the genes present in mobile element ICETh2, absent in other T. thermophilus strains. Using different strategies we ablated the function of Ppol in HB27 cells, either by knocking out the gene through insertional mutagenesis, markerless deletion or through abolition of its catalytic activity. Whole genome sequencing of this diverse collection of Ppol mutants showed spontaneous loss of function mutation in the helicase-nuclease AddAB in every ppol mutant isolated. Given that AddAB is a major player in recombinational repair in many prokaryotes, with similar activity to the proteobacterial RecBCD complex, we have performed a detailed characterization of the ppol mutants in combination with addAB mutants. The results show that knockout addAB mutants are more sensitive to DNA damage agents than the wild type, and present a dramatic three orders of magnitude increase in natural transformation efficiencies with both plasmid and lineal DNA, whereas ppol mutants show defects in plasmid stability. Interestingly, DNA-integrity comet assays showed that the genome of all the ppol and/or addAB mutants was severely affected by widespread fragmentation, however, this did not translate in neat loss of viability of the strains. All these data support that Ppol appears to keep in balance the activity of AddAB as a part of the DNA housekeeping maintenance in T. thermophilus HB27, thus, playing a key role in its genome stability.

Translesion Synthesis across the N2-Ethyl-deoxyguanosine Adduct by Human PrimPol

Primase-DNA polymerase (PrimPol) is involved in reinitiating DNA synthesis at stalled replication forks. PrimPol also possesses DNA translesion (TLS) activity and bypasses several endogenous nonbulky DNA lesions in vitro. Little is known about the TLS activity of PrimPol across bulky carcinogenic adducts. We analyzed the DNA polymerase activity of human PrimPol on DNA templates with seven N²-dG lesions of different steric bulkiness. In the presence of Mg²⁺ ions, bulky N²-isobutyl-dG, N²-benzyl-dG, N²-methyl(1-naphthyl)-dG, N²-methyl(9-anthracenyl)-dG, N²-methyl(1-pyrenyl)-dG, and N²-methyl(1,3-dimethoxyanthraquinone)-dG adducts fully blocked PrimPol activity. At the same time, PrimPol incorporated complementary deoxycytidine monophosphate (dCMP) opposite N²-ethyl-dG with moderate efficiency but did not extend DNA beyond the lesion. We also demonstrated that mutation of the Arg288 residue abrogated dCMP incorporation opposite the lesion in the presence of Mn²⁺ ions. When Mn²⁺ replaced Mg²⁺, PrimPol carried out DNA synthesis on all DNA templates with N²-dG adducts in standing start reactions with low efficiency and accuracy, possibly utilizing a lesion "skipping" mechanism. The TLS activity of PrimPol opposite N²-ethyl-dG but not bulkier adducts was stimulated by accessory proteins, polymerase delta-interacting protein 2 (PolDIP2), and replication protein A (RPA). Molecular dynamics studies demonstrated the absence of stable interactions with deoxycytidine triphosphate (dCTP), large reactions, and C1'-C1' distances for the N²-isobutyl-dG and N²-benzyl-dG PrimPol complexes, suggesting that the size of the adduct is a limiting factor for efficient TLS across minor groove adducts by PrimPol.

Identification and Validation of a DNA Damage Repair-Related Signature for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in adults, whose prognostic scoring system remains to be improved. Dysfunction of DNA repair genes is closely associated with the development and prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The aim of this study was to establish and validate a DNA repair-related gene signature associated with the prognosis of DLBCL and to investigate the clinical predictive value of this signature.

METHODS

DLBCL cases were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. One hundred ninety-nine DNA repair-related gene sets were retrieved from the GeneCards database. The LASSO Cox regression was used to generate the DNA repair-related gene signature. Subsequently, the level of immune cell infiltration and the correlation between the gene signature and immune cells were analyzed using the CIBERSORT algorithm. Based on the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database, the relationship between the signature and drug sensitivity was analyzed, and together with the nomogram and gene set variation analysis (GSVA), the value of the signature for clinical application was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 14 DNA repair genes were screened out and included in the final risk model. Subgroup analysis of the training and validation cohorts showed that the risk model accurately predicted overall survival of DLBCL patients, with patients in the high-risk group having a worse prognosis than patients in the low-risk group. Subsequently, the risk score was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor by multivariate analysis. Furthermore, by CIBERSORT analysis, we discovered that immune cells, such as regulatory T cells (Tregs), activated memory CD4+ T cells, and gamma delta T cells showed significant differences between the high- and low-risk groups. In addition, we found some interesting associations of our signature with immune checkpoint genes (CD96, TGFBR1, and TIGIT). By analyzing drug sensitivity data in the GDSC database, we were able to identify potential therapeutics for DLBCL patients stratified according to our signature.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified and validated a 14-DNA repair-related gene signature for stratification and prognostic prediction of DLBCL patients, which might guide clinical personalization of treatment.

Stress-triggered hematopoietic stem cell proliferation relies on PrimPol-mediated repriming

Stem cell division is linked to tumorigenesis by yet-elusive mechanisms. The hematopoietic system reacts to stress by triggering hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) proliferation, which can be accompanied by chromosomal breakage in activated hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). However, whether these lesions persist in their downstream progeny and induce a canonical DNA damage response (DDR) remains unclear. Inducing HSPC proliferation by simulated viral infection, we report that the associated DNA damage is restricted to HSCs and that proliferating HSCs rewire their DDR upon endogenous and clastogen-induced damage. Combining transcriptomics, single-cell and single-molecule assays on murine bone marrow cells, we found accelerated fork progression in stimulated HSPCs, reflecting engagement of PrimPol-dependent repriming, at the expense of replication fork reversal. Ultimately, competitive bone marrow transplantation revealed the requirement of PrimPol for efficient HSC amplification and bone marrow reconstitution. Hence, fine-tuning replication fork plasticity is essential to support stem cell functionality upon proliferation stimuli.

Mitochondrial DNA Instability in Mammalian Cells

Significance: The small, multicopy mitochondrial genome (mitochondrial DNA [mtDNA]) is essential for efficient energy production, as alterations in its coding information or a decrease in its copy number disrupt mitochondrial ATP synthesis. However, the mitochondrial replication machinery encounters numerous challenges that may limit its ability to duplicate this important genome and that jeopardize mtDNA stability, including various lesions in the DNA template, topological stress, and an insufficient nucleotide supply. Recent Advances: An ever-growing array of DNA repair or maintenance factors are being reported to localize to the mitochondria. We review current knowledge regarding the mitochondrial factors that may contribute to the tolerance or repair of various types of changes in the mitochondrial genome, such as base damage, incorporated ribonucleotides, and strand breaks. We also discuss the newly discovered link between mtDNA instability and activation of the innate immune response. Critical Issues: By which mechanisms do mitochondria respond to challenges that threaten mtDNA maintenance? What types of mtDNA damage are repaired, and when are the affected molecules degraded instead? And, finally, which forms of mtDNA instability trigger an immune response, and how? Future Directions: Further work is required to understand the contribution of the DNA repair and damage-tolerance factors present in the mitochondrial compartment, as well as the balance between mtDNA repair and degradation. Finally, efforts to understand the events underlying mtDNA release into the cytosol are warranted. Pursuing these and many related avenues can improve our understanding of what goes wrong in mitochondrial disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 36, 885-905.

CHK1 phosphorylates PRIMPOL to promote replication stress tolerance

Replication-coupled DNA repair and damage tolerance mechanisms overcome replication stress challenges and complete DNA synthesis. These pathways include fork reversal, translesion synthesis, and repriming by specialized polymerases such as PRIMPOL. Here, we investigated how these pathways are used and regulated in response to varying replication stresses. Blocking lagging-strand priming using a POLα inhibitor slows both leading- and lagging-strand synthesis due in part to RAD51-, HLTF-, and ZRANB3-mediated, but SMARCAL1-independent, fork reversal. ATR is activated, but CHK1 signaling is dampened compared to stalling both the leading and lagging strands with hydroxyurea. Increasing CHK1 activation by overexpressing CLASPIN in POLα-inhibited cells promotes replication elongation through PRIMPOL-dependent repriming. CHK1 phosphorylates PRIMPOL to promote repriming irrespective of the type of replication stress, and this phosphorylation is important for cellular resistance to DNA damage. However, PRIMPOL activation comes at the expense of single-strand gap formation, and constitutive PRIMPOL activity results in reduced cell fitness.

PrimPol: A Breakthrough among DNA Replication Enzymes and a Potential New Target for Cancer Therapy

DNA replication can encounter blocking obstacles, leading to replication stress and genome instability. There are several mechanisms for evading this blockade. One mechanism consists of repriming ahead of the obstacles, creating a new starting point; in humans, PrimPol is responsible for carrying out this task. PrimPol is a primase that operates in both the nucleus and mitochondria. In contrast with conventional primases, PrimPol is a DNA primase able to initiate DNA synthesis de novo using deoxynucleotides, discriminating against ribonucleotides. In vitro, PrimPol can act as a DNA primase, elongating primers that PrimPol itself sythesizes, or as translesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerase, elongating pre-existing primers across lesions. However, the lack of evidence for PrimPol polymerase activity in vivo suggests that PrimPol only acts as a DNA primase. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of human PrimPol covering its biochemical properties and structure, in vivo function and regulation, and the processes that take place to fill the gap-containing lesion that PrimPol leaves behind. Finally, we explore the available data on human PrimPol expression in different tissues in physiological conditions and its role in cancer.

PLK1 regulates the PrimPol damage tolerance pathway during the cell cycle

Replication stress and DNA damage stall replication forks and impede genome synthesis. During S phase, damage tolerance pathways allow lesion bypass to ensure efficient genome duplication. One such pathway is repriming, mediated by Primase-Polymerase (PrimPol) in human cells. However, the mechanisms by which PrimPol is regulated are poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that PrimPol is phosphorylated by Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) at a conserved residue between PrimPol’s RPA binding motifs. This phosphorylation is differentially modified throughout the cell cycle, which prevents aberrant recruitment of PrimPol to chromatin. Phosphorylation can also be delayed and reversed in response to replication stress. The absence of PLK1-dependent regulation of PrimPol induces phenotypes including chromosome breaks, micronuclei, and decreased survival after treatment with camptothecin, olaparib, and UV-C. Together, these findings establish that deregulated repriming leads to genomic instability, highlighting the importance of regulating this damage tolerance pathway following fork stalling and throughout the cell cycle.

Temporally distinct post-replicative repair mechanisms fill PRIMPOL-dependent ssDNA gaps in human cells

PRIMPOL repriming allows DNA replication to skip DNA lesions, leading to ssDNA gaps. These gaps must be filled to preserve genome stability. Using a DNA fiber approach to directly monitor gap filling, we studied the post-replicative mechanisms that fill the ssDNA gaps generated in cisplatin-treated cells upon increased PRIMPOL expression or when replication fork reversal is defective because of SMARCAL1 inactivation or PARP inhibition. We found that a mechanism dependent on the E3 ubiquitin ligase RAD18, PCNA monoubiquitination, and the REV1 and POLζ translesion synthesis polymerases promotes gap filling in G2. The E2-conjugating enzyme UBC13, the RAD51 recombinase, and REV1-POLζ are instead responsible for gap filling in S, suggesting that temporally distinct pathways of gap filling operate throughout the cell cycle. Furthermore, we found that BRCA1 and BRCA2 promote gap filling by limiting MRE11 activity and that simultaneously targeting fork reversal and gap filling enhances chemosensitivity in BRCA-deficient cells.

REV1-Polζ maintains the viability of homologous recombination-deficient cancer cells through mutagenic repair of PRIMPOL-dependent ssDNA gaps

BRCA1/2 mutant tumor cells display an elevated mutation burden, the etiology of which remains unclear. Here, we report that these cells accumulate ssDNA gaps and spontaneous mutations during unperturbed DNA replication due to repriming by the DNA primase-polymerase PRIMPOL. Gap accumulation requires the DNA glycosylase SMUG1 and is exacerbated by depletion of the translesion synthesis (TLS) factor RAD18 or inhibition of the error-prone TLS polymerase complex REV1-Polζ by the small molecule JH-RE-06. JH-RE-06 treatment of BRCA1/2-deficient cells results in reduced mutation rates and PRIMPOL- and SMUG1-dependent loss of viability. Through cellular and animal studies, we demonstrate that JH-RE-06 is preferentially toxic toward HR-deficient cancer cells. Furthermore, JH-RE-06 remains effective toward PARP inhibitor (PARPi)-resistant BRCA1 mutant cells and displays additive toxicity with crosslinking agents or PARPi. Collectively, these studies identify a protective and mutagenic role for REV1-Polζ in BRCA1/2 mutant cells and provide the rationale for using REV1-Polζ inhibitors to treat BRCA1/2 mutant tumors.

Human PrimPol Discrimination against Dideoxynucleotides during Primer Synthesis

PrimPol is required to re-prime DNA replication at both nucleus and mitochondria, thus facilitating fork progression during replicative stress. ddC is a chain-terminating nucleotide that has been widely used to block mitochondrial DNA replication because it is efficiently incorporated by the replicative polymerase Polγ. Here, we show that human PrimPol discriminates against dideoxynucleotides (ddNTP) when elongating a primer across 8oxoG lesions in the template, but also when starting de novo synthesis of DNA primers, and especially when selecting the 3′nucleotide of the initial dimer. PrimPol incorporates ddNTPs with a very low efficiency compared to dNTPs even in the presence of activating manganese ions, and only a 40-fold excess of ddNTP would significantly disturb PrimPol primase activity. This discrimination against ddNTPs prevents premature termination of the primers, warranting their use for elongation. The crystal structure of human PrimPol highlights Arg²⁹¹ residue as responsible for the strong dNTP/ddNTP selectivity, since it interacts with the 3′-OH group of the incoming deoxynucleotide, absent in ddNTPs. Arg²⁹¹, shown here to be critical for both primase and polymerase activities of human PrimPol, would contribute to the preferred binding of dNTPs versus ddNTPs at the 3′elongation site, thus avoiding synthesis of abortive primers.

Translesion activity of PrimPol on DNA with cisplatin and DNA-protein cross-links

Human PrimPol belongs to the archaeo-eukaryotic primase superfamily of primases and is involved in de novo DNA synthesis downstream of blocking DNA lesions and non-B DNA structures. PrimPol possesses both DNA/RNA primase and DNA polymerase activities, and also bypasses a number of DNA lesions in vitro. In this work, we have analyzed translesion synthesis activity of PrimPol in vitro on DNA with an 1,2-intrastrand cisplatin cross-link (1,2-GG CisPt CL) or a model DNA–protein cross-link (DpCL). PrimPol was capable of the 1,2-GG CisPt CL bypass in the presence of Mn²⁺ ions and preferentially incorporated two complementary dCMPs opposite the lesion. Nucleotide incorporation was stimulated by PolDIP2, and yeast Pol ζ efficiently extended from the nucleotides inserted opposite the 1,2-GG CisPt CL in vitro. DpCLs significantly blocked the DNA polymerase activity and strand displacement synthesis of PrimPol. However, PrimPol was able to reach the DpCL site in single strand template DNA in the presence of both Mg²⁺ and Mn²⁺ ions despite the presence of the bulky protein obstacle.

Motif WFYY of human PrimPol is crucial to stabilize the incoming 3'-nucleotide during replication fork restart

PrimPol is the second primase in human cells, the first with the ability to start DNA chains with dNTPs. PrimPol contributes to DNA damage tolerance by restarting DNA synthesis beyond stalling lesions, acting as a TLS primase. Multiple alignment of eukaryotic PrimPols allowed us to identify a highly conserved motif, WxxY near the invariant motif A, which contains two active site metal ligands in all members of the archeo-eukaryotic primase (AEP) superfamily. In vivo and in vitro analysis of single variants of the WFYY motif of human PrimPol demonstrated that the invariant Trp⁸⁷ and Tyr⁹⁰ residues are essential for both primase and polymerase activities, mainly due to their crucial role in binding incoming nucleotides. Accordingly, the human variant F88L, altering the WFYY motif, displayed reduced binding of incoming nucleotides, affecting its primase/polymerase activities especially during TLS reactions on UV-damaged DNA. Conversely, the Y89D mutation initially associated with High Myopia did not affect the ability to rescue stalled replication forks in human cells. Collectively, our data suggest that the WFYY motif has a fundamental role in stabilizing the incoming 3′-nucleotide, an essential requisite for both its primase and TLS abilities during replication fork restart.

Mechanisms for Maintaining Eukaryotic Replisome Progression in the Presence of DNA Damage

The eukaryotic replisome coordinates template unwinding and nascent-strand synthesis to drive DNA replication fork progression and complete efficient genome duplication. During its advancement along the parental template, each replisome may encounter an array of obstacles including damaged and structured DNA that impede its progression and threaten genome stability. A number of mechanisms exist to permit replisomes to overcome such obstacles, maintain their progression, and prevent fork collapse. A combination of recent advances in structural, biochemical, and single-molecule approaches have illuminated the architecture of the replisome during unperturbed replication, rationalised the impact of impediments to fork progression, and enhanced our understanding of DNA damage tolerance mechanisms and their regulation. This review focusses on these studies to provide an updated overview of the mechanisms that support replisomes to maintain their progression on an imperfect template.

Repriming DNA synthesis: an intrinsic restart pathway that maintains efficient genome replication

To bypass a diverse range of fork stalling impediments encountered during genome replication, cells possess a variety of DNA damage tolerance (DDT) mechanisms including translesion synthesis, template switching, and fork reversal. These pathways function to bypass obstacles and allow efficient DNA synthesis to be maintained. In addition, lagging strand obstacles can also be circumvented by downstream priming during Okazaki fragment generation, leaving gaps to be filled post-replication. Whether repriming occurs on the leading strand has been intensely debated over the past half-century. Early studies indicated that both DNA strands were synthesised discontinuously. Although later studies suggested that leading strand synthesis was continuous, leading to the preferred semi-discontinuous replication model. However, more recently it has been established that replicative primases can perform leading strand repriming in prokaryotes. An analogous fork restart mechanism has also been identified in most eukaryotes, which possess a specialist primase called PrimPol that conducts repriming downstream of stalling lesions and structures. PrimPol also plays a more general role in maintaining efficient fork progression. Here, we review and discuss the historical evidence and recent discoveries that substantiate repriming as an intrinsic replication restart pathway for maintaining efficient genome duplication across all domains of life.

Consequences and Resolution of Transcription-Replication Conflicts

Transcription–replication conflicts occur when the two critical cellular machineries responsible for gene expression and genome duplication collide with each other on the same genomic location. Although both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have evolved multiple mechanisms to coordinate these processes on individual chromosomes, it is now clear that conflicts can arise due to aberrant transcription regulation and premature proliferation, leading to DNA replication stress and genomic instability. As both are considered hallmarks of aging and human diseases such as cancer, understanding the cellular consequences of conflicts is of paramount importance. In this article, we summarize our current knowledge on where and when collisions occur and how these encounters affect the genome and chromatin landscape of cells. Finally, we conclude with the different cellular pathways and multiple mechanisms that cells have put in place at conflict sites to ensure the resolution of conflicts and accurate genome duplication.

A unique arginine cluster in PolDIP2 enhances nucleotide binding and DNA synthesis by PrimPol

Replication forks often stall at damaged DNA. To overcome these obstructions and complete the DNA duplication in a timely fashion, replication can be restarted downstream of the DNA lesion. In mammalian cells, this repriming of replication can be achieved through the activities of primase and polymerase PrimPol. PrimPol is stimulated in DNA synthesis through interaction with PolDIP2, however the exact mechanism of this PolDIP2-dependent stimulation is still unclear. Here, we show that PrimPol uses a flexible loop to interact with the C-terminal ApaG-like domain of PolDIP2, and that this contact is essential for PrimPol's enhanced processivity. PolDIP2 increases primer-template and dNTP binding affinities of PrimPol, which concomitantly enhances its nucleotide incorporation efficiency. This stimulation is dependent on a unique arginine cluster in PolDIP2. Since the polymerase activity of PrimPol alone is very limited, this mechanism, where the affinity for dNTPs gets increased by PolDIP2 binding, might be critical for the in vivo function of PrimPol in tolerating DNA lesions at physiological nucleotide concentrations.

To skip or not to skip: choosing repriming to tolerate DNA damage

Accurate DNA replication is constantly threatened by DNA lesions arising from endogenous and exogenous sources. Specialized DNA replication stress response pathways ensure replication fork progression in the presence of DNA lesions with minimal delay in fork elongation. These pathways broadly include translesion DNA synthesis, template switching, and replication fork repriming. Here, we discuss recent advances toward our understanding of the mechanisms that regulate the fine-tuned balance between these different replication stress response pathways. We also discuss the molecular pathways required to fill single-stranded DNA gaps that accumulate throughout the genome after repriming and the biological consequences of using repriming instead of other DNA damage tolerance pathways on genome integrity and cell fitness.

Translesion DNA Synthesis and Reinitiation of DNA Synthesis in Chemotherapy Resistance

Many chemotherapy drugs block tumor cell division by damaging DNA. DNA polymerases eta (Pol η), iota (Pol ι), kappa (Pol κ), REV1 of the Y-family and zeta (Pol ζ) of the B-family efficiently incorporate nucleotides opposite a number of DNA lesions during translesion DNA synthesis. Primase-polymerase PrimPol and the Pol α-primase complex reinitiate DNA synthesis downstream of the damaged sites using their DNA primase activity. These enzymes can decrease the efficacy of chemotherapy drugs, contribute to the survival of tumor cells and to the progression of malignant diseases. DNA polymerases are promising targets for increasing the effectiveness of chemotherapy, and mutations and polymorphisms in some DNA polymerases can serve as additional prognostic markers in a number of oncological disorders.

Pold4, the fourth subunit of replicative polymerase δ, suppresses gene conversion in the immunoglobulin-variable gene in avian DT40 cells

The replicative polymerase δ (Polδ), consisting of four subunits, plays a pivotal role in chromosomal replication. Pold4, the smallest subunit of Polδ, is believed to contribute to the regulation of replication by facilitating repair in response to DNA damage. However, that contribution has not been fully elucidated. We here show that Pold4 contributes to the suppression of gene conversion in immunoglobulin-variable (IgV) gene diversification in the chicken DT40 lymphocyte cell line, where gene conversion diversifies the IgV gene through intragenic homologous recombination (HR) between diverged pseudo-V segments. IgV gene conversion is initiated by activation-induced cytidine deaminase-mediated uracil formation in the IgV gene, which in turn converts into an abasic site, leading to replication arrest. POLD4^-/- cells exhibited an increased rate of IgV gene conversion. Moreover, the gene-conversion tract was lengthened and the usage of pseudo-V segments was altered, showing a preference, to use the diverged sequence as a donor in POLD4^-/- cells. These data suggest that Pold4 is involved in the regulation of HR-mediated gene conversion in IgV diversification. By contrast, the rate in HR-mediated, sister-chromatid exchange and gene-targeting induced by an I-SceI endonclease-mediated DNA double-strand break exhibited by POLD4^-/- cells was indistinguishable from that by wild-type cells. These findings indicate that the functionality of general HR is preserved in POLD4^-/- cells. In conclusion, Pold4 is involved in the suppression of IgV-gene conversion without affecting the general functionality of HR.

PRIMPOL ready, set, reprime!

DNA replication forks are constantly challenged by DNA lesions induced by endogenous and exogenous sources. DNA damage tolerance mechanisms ensure that DNA replication continues with minimal effects on replication fork elongation either by using specialized DNA polymerases, which have the ability to replicate through the damaged template, or by skipping the damaged DNA, leaving it to be repaired after replication. These mechanisms are evolutionarily conserved in bacteria, yeast, and higher eukaryotes, and are paramount to ensure timely and faithful duplication of the genome. The Primase and DNA-directed Polymerase (PRIMPOL) is a recently discovered enzyme that possesses both primase and polymerase activities. PRIMPOL is emerging as a key player in DNA damage tolerance, particularly in vertebrate and human cells. Here, we review our current understanding of the function of PRIMPOL in DNA damage tolerance by focusing on the structural aspects that define its dual enzymatic activity, as well as on the mechanisms that control its chromatin recruitment and expression levels. We also focus on the latest findings on the mitochondrial and nuclear functions of PRIMPOL and on the impact of loss of these functions on genome stability and cell survival. Defining the function of PRIMPOL in DNA damage tolerance is becoming increasingly important in the context of human disease. In particular, we discuss recent evidence pointing at the PRIMPOL pathway as a novel molecular target to improve cancer cell response to DNA-damaging chemotherapy and as a predictive parameter to stratify patients in personalized cancer therapy.

The DNA ligands Arg47 and Arg76 are crucial for catalysis by human PrimPol

Human primase and DNA polymerase PrimPol re-starts stalled replication forks by repriming downstream DNA lesions and protects cells against DNA damage. Structure of the catalytic core of PrimPol with DNA primer, template and incoming dATP was solved but the mechanisms of DNA polymerase and primase activities of PrimPol are not fully understood. In this work, using site-directed mutagenesis we biochemically analyzed the role of active site residues Arg47 and Arg76 contacting DNA template in DNA polymerase and primase activities of PrimPol. The substitution R47A diminished the DNA polymerase and primase activities of PrimPol whereas the single amino acid substitution R76A caused almost complete loss of catalytic activities. Both amino acid substitutions affected the spectrum of dNMPs incorporation on undamaged DNA templates and opposite 8-oxoguanine. Finally, substitutions of the Arg47 and Arg76 residues attenuated the formation of the stable PrimPol:DNA complex in the presence of ATP/dNTPs. Together, these findings suggest a key role of the Arg47 and Arg76 in DNA synthesis by PrimPol.

The deubiquitinase USP36 Regulates DNA replication stress and confers therapeutic resistance through PrimPol stabilization

PrimPol has been recently identified as a DNA damage tolerant polymerase that plays an important role in replication stress response. However, the regulatory mechanisms of PrimPol are not well defined. In this study, we identify that the deubiquitinase USP36 interferes with degradation of PrimPol to regulate the replication stress response. Mechanistically, USP36 is deubiquitinated following DNA replication stress, which in turn facilitates its upregulation and interaction with PrimPol. USP36 deubiquitinates K29-linked polyubiquitination of PrimPol and increases its protein stability. Depletion of USP36 results in replication stress-related defects and elevates cell sensitivity to DNA-damage agents, such as cisplatin and olaparib. Moreover, USP36 expression positively correlates with the level of PrimPol protein and poor prognosis in patient samples. These findings indicate that the regulation of PrimPol K29-linked ubiquitination by USP36 plays a critical role in DNA replication stress and chemotherapy response.

Translesion DNA Synthesis and Carcinogenesis

Tens of thousands of DNA lesions are formed in mammalian cells each day. DNA translesion synthesis is the main mechanism of cell defense against unrepaired DNA lesions. DNA polymerases iota (Pol ι), eta (Pol η), kappa (Pol κ), and zeta (Pol ζ) have active sites that are less stringent toward the DNA template structure and efficiently incorporate nucleotides opposite DNA lesions. However, these polymerases display low accuracy of DNA synthesis and can introduce mutations in genomic DNA. Impaired functioning of these enzymes can lead to an increased risk of cancer.

Strand Displacement Activity of PrimPol

Human PrimPol is a unique enzyme possessing DNA/RNA primase and DNA polymerase activities. In this work, we demonstrated that PrimPol efficiently fills a 5-nt gap and possesses the conditional strand displacement activity stimulated by Mn²⁺ ions and accessory replicative proteins RPA and PolDIP2. The DNA displacement activity of PrimPol was found to be more efficient than the RNA displacement activity and FEN1 processed the 5′-DNA flaps generated by PrimPol in vitro.

PrimPol-dependent single-stranded gap formation mediates homologous recombination at bulky DNA adducts

Stalled replication forks can be restarted and repaired by RAD51-mediated homologous recombination (HR), but HR can also perform post-replicative repair after bypass of the obstacle. Bulky DNA adducts are important replication-blocking lesions, but it is unknown whether they activate HR at stalled forks or behind ongoing forks. Using mainly BPDE-DNA adducts as model lesions, we show that HR induced by bulky adducts in mammalian cells predominantly occurs at post-replicative gaps formed by the DNA/RNA primase PrimPol. RAD51 recruitment under these conditions does not result from fork stalling, but rather occurs at gaps formed by PrimPol re-priming and resection by MRE11 and EXO1. In contrast, RAD51 loading at double-strand breaks does not require PrimPol. At bulky adducts, PrimPol promotes sister chromatid exchange and genetic recombination. Our data support that HR at bulky adducts in mammalian cells involves post-replicative gap repair and define a role for PrimPol in HR-mediated DNA damage tolerance.

Time for remodeling: SNF2-family DNA translocases in replication fork metabolism and human disease

Over the course of DNA replication, DNA lesions, transcriptional intermediates and protein-DNA complexes can impair the progression of replication forks, thus resulting in replication stress. Failure to maintain replication fork integrity in response to replication stress leads to genomic instability and predisposes to the development of cancer and other genetic disorders. Multiple DNA damage and repair pathways have evolved to allow completion of DNA replication following replication stress, thus preserving genomic integrity. One of the processes commonly induced in response to replication stress is fork reversal, which consists in the remodeling of stalled replication forks into four-way DNA junctions. In normal conditions, fork reversal slows down replication fork progression to ensure accurate repair of DNA lesions and facilitates replication fork restart once the DNA lesions have been removed. However, in certain pathological situations, such as the deficiency of DNA repair factors that protect regressed forks from nuclease-mediated degradation, fork reversal can cause genomic instability. In this review, we describe the complex molecular mechanisms regulating fork reversal, with a focus on the role of the SNF2-family fork remodelers SMARCAL1, ZRANB3 and HLTF, and highlight the implications of fork reversal for tumorigenesis and cancer therapy.

HLTF Promotes Fork Reversal, Limiting Replication Stress Resistance and Preventing Multiple Mechanisms of Unrestrained DNA Synthesis

DNA replication stress can stall replication forks, leading to genome instability. DNA damage tolerance pathways assist fork progression, promoting replication fork reversal, translesion DNA synthesis (TLS), and repriming. In the absence of the fork remodeler HLTF, forks fail to slow following replication stress, but underlying mechanisms and cellular consequences remain elusive. Here, we demonstrate that HLTF-deficient cells fail to undergo fork reversal in vivo and rely on the primase-polymerase PRIMPOL for repriming, unrestrained replication, and S phase progression upon limiting nucleotide levels. By contrast, in an HLTF-HIRAN mutant, unrestrained replication relies on the TLS protein REV1. Importantly, HLTF-deficient cells also exhibit reduced double-strand break (DSB) formation and increased survival upon replication stress. Our findings suggest that HLTF promotes fork remodeling, preventing other mechanisms of replication stress tolerance in cancer cells. This remarkable plasticity of the replication fork may determine the outcome of replication stress in terms of genome integrity, tumorigenesis, and response to chemotherapy.

Identifying the role of PrimPol in TDF-induced toxicity and implications of its loss of function mutation in an HIV+ patient

A key component of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV patients is the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) is tenofovir. Recent reports of tenofovir toxicity in patients taking ART for HIV cannot be explained solely on the basis of off-target inhibition of mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma (Polγ). PrimPol was discovered as a primase-polymerase localized to the mitochondria with repriming and translesion synthesis capabilities and, therefore, a potential contributor to mitochondrial toxicity. We established a possible role of PrimPol in tenofovir-induced toxicity in vitro and show that tenofovir-diphosphate incorporation by PrimPol is dependent on the n-1 nucleotide. We identified and characterized a PrimPol mutation, D114N, in an HIV+ patient on tenofovir-based ART with mitochondrial toxicity. This mutant form of PrimPol, targeting a catalytic metal ligand, was unable to synthesize primers, likely due to protein instability and weakened DNA binding. We performed cellular respiration and toxicity assays using PrimPol overexpression and shRNA knockdown strains in renal proximal tubular epithelial cells. The PrimPol-knockdown strain was hypersensitive to tenofovir treatment, indicating that PrimPol protects against tenofovir-induced mitochondrial toxicity. We show that a major cellular role of PrimPol is protecting against toxicity caused by ART and individuals with inactivating mutations may be predisposed to these effects.

Replication Fork Remodeling and Therapy Escape in DNA Damage Response-Deficient Cancers

Most cancers have lost a critical DNA damage response (DDR) pathway during tumor evolution. These alterations provide a useful explanation for the initial sensitivity of tumors to DNA-targeting chemotherapy. A striking example is dysfunctional homology-directed repair (HDR), e.g., due to inactivating mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Extensive efforts are being made to develop novel targeted therapies exploiting such an HDR defect. Inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) are an instructive example of this approach. Despite the success of PARP inhibitors, the presence of primary or acquired therapy resistance remains a major challenge in clinical oncology. To move the field of precision medicine forward, we need to understand the precise mechanisms causing therapy resistance. Using preclinical models, various mechanisms underlying chemotherapy resistance have been identified. Restoration of HDR seems to be a prevalent mechanism but this does not explain resistance in all cases. Interestingly, some factors involved in DNA damage response (DDR) have independent functions in replication fork (RF) biology and their loss causes RF instability and therapy sensitivity. However, in BRCA-deficient tumors, loss of these factors leads to restored stability of RFs and acquired drug resistance. In this review we discuss the recent advances in the field of RF biology and its potential implications for chemotherapy response in DDR-defective cancers. Additionally, we review the role of DNA damage tolerance (DDT) pathways in maintenance of genome integrity and their alterations in cancer. Furthermore, we refer to novel tools that, combined with a better understanding of drug resistance mechanisms, may constitute a great advance in personalized diagnosis and therapeutic strategies for patients with HDR-deficient tumors.