Managing cognitive symptoms and fatigue in cholestatic liver disease

Treatment in primary biliary cholangitis: Beyond ursodeoxycholic acid

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a rare cholestatic immune-mediated liver disease. The clinical course varies from mild to severe, with a substantial group of patients developing cirrhosis within a decade. These patients are at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, decompensation and liver failure. First line Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment improves the cholestatic surrogate markers, and was recently associated with a favorable survival free of liver transplantation, even in case of an incomplete biochemical response. However, despite adequate UDCA therapy, patients remain at risk of liver disease progression. Therefore, on-treatment multifactor-based risk stratification is necessary to identify patients in need of additional therapy. This requires a personalized approach; especially as recent studies suggest that complete biochemical normalization as most stringent response criterion might be preferred in selected patients to optimize their outcome. Today, stricter biochemical goals might actually be reachable with the addition of farnesoid X receptor or peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, or, in highly-selected cases, use of corticosteroids. Randomized controlled trials showed improvements in the key biochemical surrogate markers with the addition of these drugs, which have also been associated with improved clinical outcome. Considering this evolving PBC landscape, with more versatile treatment options and treatment goals, this review recapitulates the recent insight in UDCA therapy, the selection of patients with a residual risk of liver disease progression and the results of the currently available second line treatment options.

New Therapies on the Horizon for Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease that can progress to cirrhosis and hepatic failure if left untreated. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) was introduced as a first-line drug for PBC around 1990; it remarkably improved patient outcomes, leading to the nomenclature change of PBC in 2015, from primary biliary "cirrhosis" to primary biliary "cholangitis." Nevertheless, 20-30% of patients exhibit an incomplete response to UDCA, resulting in significantly worse outcomes compared to those with a complete response. Therefore, improving the long-term outcomes of patients with an incomplete response to UDCA has been recognized as an unmet need. In addition, patients with PBC often suffer from a variety of debilitating symptoms, such as pruritus, fatigue and sicca syndrome, which significantly impair their health-related quality of life. Thus, appropriate management of these symptoms is currently regarded as another unmet need for PBC treatment. In this review, several compounds and drugs under clinical trials that can potentially solve these unmet needs are comprehensively discussed, and future directions of treatment policy of PBC are proposed for significantly improving long-term outcome as well as health-related quality of life of patients.

New Treatment Paradigms in Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an archetypal autoimmune disease. Chronic lymphocytic cholangitis is associated with interface hepatitis, ductopenia, cholestasis, and progressive biliary fibrosis. People living with PBC are frequently symptomatic, experiencing a quality-of-life burden dominated by fatigue, itch, abdominal pain, and sicca complex. Although the female predominance, specific serum autoantibodies, immune-mediated cellular injury, as well as genetic (HLA and non-HLA) risk factors, identify PBC as autoimmune, to date treatment has focused on cholestatic consequences. Biliary epithelial homeostasis is abnormal and contributes to disease. The impact of cholangiocyte senescence, apoptosis, and impaired bicarbonate secretion enhances chronic inflammation and bile acid retention. First-line therapy is a non-specific anti-cholestatic agent, ursodeoxycholic acid. For those with residual cholestasis biochemically, obeticholic acid is introduced, and this semisynthetic farnesoid X receptor agonist adds choleretic, anti-fibrotic, and anti-inflammatory activity. Future PBC licensed therapy will likely include peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) pathway agonists, including specific PPAR-delta agonism (seladelpar), as well as elafibrinor and saroglitazar (both with broader PPAR agonism). These agents dovetail the clinical and trial experience for off-label bezafibrate and fenofibrate use. Symptom management is essential, and encouragingly, PPAR agonists reduce itch; IBAT inhibition (eg, linerixibat) also appears promising for pruritus. For those where liver fibrosis is the target, NOX inhibition is being evaluated. Earlier stage therapies in development include therapy to impact immunoregulation in patients, as well other approaches to treating pruritus (eg, antagonists of MrgprX4). Collectively the PBC therapeutic landscape is exciting. Therapy goals are increasingly proactive and individualized and aspire to rapidly achieve normal serum tests and quality of life with prevention of end-stage liver disease.

Regulation of mild cognitive impairment associated with liver disease by humoral factors derived from the gastrointestinal tract and MRI research progress: a literature review

Patients with liver disease are prone to various cognitive impairments. It is undeniable that cognitive impairment is often regulated by both the nervous system and the immune system. In this review our research focused on the regulation of mild cognitive impairment associated with liver disease by humoral factors derived from the gastrointestinal tract, and revealed that its mechanisms may be involved with hyperammonemia, neuroinflammation, brain energy and neurotransmitter metabolic disorders, and liver-derived factors. In addition, we share the emerging research progress in magnetic resonance imaging techniques of the brain during mild cognitive impairment associated with liver disease, in order to provide ideas for the prevention and treatment of mild cognitive impairment in liver disease.

Primary biliary cholangitis: Epidemiology, prognosis, and treatment

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic autoimmune liver disease characterized by a destructive, small duct, and lymphocytic cholangitis, and marked by the presence of antimitochondrial antibodies. The incidence and prevalence of PBC vary widely in different regions and time periods, and although disproportionally more common among White non-Hispanic females, contemporary data show a higher prevalence in males and racial minorities than previously described. Outcomes largely depend on early recognition of the disease and prompt institution of treatment, which, in turn, are directly influenced by provider bias and socioeconomic factors. Ursodeoxycholic acid remains the initial treatment of choice for PBC, with obeticholic acid and fibrates (off-label therapy) reserved as add-on therapy for the management of inadequate responders or those with ursodeoxycholic acid intolerance. Novel and repurposed drugs are currently at different stages of clinical development not only for the treatment of PBC but also for its symptomatic management. Here, we summarize the most up-to-date data regarding the epidemiology, prognosis, and treatment of PBC, providing clinically useful information for its holistic management.

Is fatigue related to the severity of liver inflammation in patients with chronic liver disease? A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

Fatigue is common in patients with chronic liver disease; however, its pathogenesis is unclear. This study aimed to provide insights into the pathogenesis of chronic liver disease-related fatigue by assessing the relationship between fatigue and the degree of inflammation in chronic liver disease.

DESIGN

We performed a cross-sectional study of 1374 patients with pathologically proven chronic liver disease diagnosed at the Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University in Hangzhou, China.

SETTING

Primary single-centre study.

PARTICIPANTS

One thousand three hundred and seventy-four patients with liver biopsy-proven chronic liver disease.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were divided into fatigue and non-fatigue groups according to the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire. Propensity score matching was used to match the baseline features of the patients in the two groups.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Liver steatosis, ballooning, inflammation and fibrosis were measured according to the pathological results of liver biopsy. Fatigue was measured using the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of the 1374 patients, 262 (19.67%) experienced fatigue. There were 242 and 484 patients with and without fatigue, respectively, who were successfully matched for sex, age and classification of chronic liver disease by propensity score matching. After matching, the fatigue group showed higher liver enzyme levels, inflammation grades and fibrosis stages than the non-fatigue group (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that age (OR: 2.026; p=0.003), autoimmune liver disease (OR: 2.749; p=0.002) and active inflammation (OR: 1.587; p=0.003) were independent risk factors for fatigue after adjusting for confounders. The OR of the risk for fatigue increased in a stepwise manner with increasing inflammation grade in young-aged and middle-aged patients (p<0.05). This tendency was not observed in elderly patients (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with chronic liver disease were burdened by fatigue, which increased progressively with rising liver inflammation severity in young-aged and middle-aged rather than elderly patients.

New IMB16-4 Hot-Melt Extrusion Preparation Improved Oral Bioavailability and Enhanced Anti-Cholestatic Effect on Rats

Background

Cholestasis is challenging to treat due to lacked effective drugs. N-(3,4,5-trichlorophenyl)-2 (3-nitrobenzenesulfonamido) benzamide, abbreviated as IMB16-4, which may be effective for the treatment of cholestasis. However, its poor solubility and bioavailability seriously obstruct the research programs.

Methods

A hot-melt extrusion (HME) preparation was first applied to increase the bioavailability of IMB16-4, the oral bioavailability, anti-cholestatic effect and vitro cytotoxicity of IMB16-4 and IMB16-4-HME were evaluated. Meanwhile, the molecular docking and qRT-PCR were used to validate the mechanism behind.

Results

The oral bioavailability of IMB16-4-HME improved 65-fold compared with that of pure IMB16-4. Pharmacodynamics results demonstrated that IMB16-4-HME prominently decreased the serum levels of total bile acid (TBA) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), but elevated the level of total bilirubin (TBIL) and direct bilirubin (DBIL). Histopathology revealed that IMB16-4-HME at lower dose exhibited stronger anti-cholestatic effect compared with pure IMB16-4. In addition, molecular docking demonstrated that IMB16-4 has great affinity with PPARα, and qRT-PCR results revealed that IMB16-4-HME significantly elevated the mRNA expression level of PPARα, but decreased the mRNA level of CYP7A1. Cytotoxicity assays demonstrated that the hepatotoxicity of IMB16-4-HME was absolutely attributed to IMB16-4, and the excipients of IMB16-4-HME may increase the drug load within HepG2 cells.

Conclusion

The HME preparation significantly increased the oral bioavailability and anti-cholestatic effect of pure IMB16-4, but caused liver injury at high dose, which require a dose balance between the curative effect and safety in the future research.

NRF2 and FXR dual signaling pathways cooperatively regulate the effects of oleanolic acid on cholestatic liver injury

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that the anti-cholestatic effect of oleanolic acid (OA) is associated with FXR and NRF2. However, how the two signaling pathways cooperate to regulate the anti-cholestatic effect of OA remains unclear.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to further demonstrate the effect of OA on alpha-naphthyl isothiocyanate (ANIT)-induced cholestatic liver injury and the interaction mechanism between NRF2 and FXR signaling pathways in maintaining bile acid homeostasis.

METHODS

Gene knockout animals and cell models, metabolomics analysis, and co-immunoprecipitation were used to investigate the mechanism of OA against cholestatic liver injury.

RESULTS

The effect of OA against ANIT-induced liver injury in rats was dramatically reduced after Nrf2 gene knockdown. With the silencing of Fxr, the hepatoprotective effect of OA was weakened, but it still effectively alleviated cholestatic liver injury in rats. In L02 cells, OA can up-regulate the levels of NRF2, FXR, BSEP and UGT1A1, and reduce the expression of CYP7A1. Silencing of NRF2 or FXR significantly attenuated the protective effect of OA on ANIT-induced L02 cell injury and its regulation on downstream target genes, and the influence of NRF2 gene silencing on OA appeared to be greater. The NRF2 activator sulforaphane, and the FXR activator GW4064 both remarkably promoted NRF2 binding to P300 and FXR to RXRα, but reduced β-catenin binding to P300 and β-catenin binding to FXR.

CONCLUSION

The effect of OA on cholestatic liver injury is closely related to the simultaneous activation of NRF2 and FXR dual signaling pathways, in which NRF2 signaling pathway plays a more important role. The dual signaling pathways of NRF2 and FXR cooperatively regulate bile acid metabolic homeostasis through the interaction mechanism with β-catenin/P300.

Guidelines for the Management of Cholestatic Liver Diseases (2021)

In 2015, the Chinese Society of Hepatology and the Chinese Society of Gastroenterology issued a consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of cholestatic liver diseases. More clinical data on this topic have appeared during recent years. The Autoimmune Liver Disease Group of the Chinese Society of Hepatology organized an expert group to review recent evidence and provide an update to these previous guidelines. Herein, we provide 22 recommendations as a working reference for the management of cholestatic liver diseases by clinical practitioners.

Oleanolic acid alleviates ANIT-induced cholestatic liver injury by activating Fxr and Nrf2 pathways to ameliorate disordered bile acids homeostasis

BACKGROUND

Cholestasis is a clinical syndrome with high incidence and few effective treatments. Oleanolic acid (OA) is a triterpenoid compound with anti-cholestatic effects. Studies using bile duct ligation or lithocholic acid modeling have shown that the alleviating effect of OA on cholerosis is related to the regulation of nuclear factor erythroid 2 related factor (Nrf2) or farnesoid X receptor (Fxr).

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate the underlying mechanism of OA against alpha-naphthylisothiocyanate (ANIT)-induced cholestatic liver injury based on Nrf2 and Fxr dual signaling pathways.

METHODS

The ANIT-induced rats model was used with or without OA treatment. Serum biochemical indexes, liver histopathological changes and glutathione level were examined. Bile acids (BAs) targeted metabolomics based on UHPLC-MS/MS were performed. siRNA, RT-qPCR and western blot analysis were used to prove the role of Fxr and Nrf2 pathway in OA's anti-cholestatic liver injury in vivo and in vitro.

RESULTS

OA significantly alleviated ANIT-induced liver injury in rats, reduced primary bile acids, accelerated metabolism of BAs and reduced the intrahepatic accumulation of BAs. The expressions of bile salt export pump (Bsep), Na+-taurocholic cotransport polypeptide (Ntcp), UDP-glucuronyl transferase 1a1 (Ugt1a1) and Fxr in rat liver were markedly up-regulated, the activation of Nrf2 was promoted, and the expression of cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase (Cyp7a1) was decreased after OA treatment. Moreover, Fxr or Nrf2 silencing attenuated the regulation of OA on BAs homeostasis related transporters and enzymes in rat primary hepatocytes.

CONCLUSION

OA may regulate BAs-related transporters and metabolic enzymes by activating Fxr and Nrf2 pathways, thus alleviating the cholestatic liver injury induced by ANIT.

Primary biliary cholangitis: advances in understanding and management

Recent years have seen major advances in our understanding of primary biliary cholangitis, with the condition now renamed to reflect the majority of patients who do not have cirrhosis. Data from large multicentre studies have greatly increased our knowledge of the natural history of primary biliary cholangitis, making the identification of higher risk patients clearer and facilitating the development of new medications. Recent guidelines have emphasised the importance of risk stratification, targeted treatment of symptoms and early prioritisation for second line therapies. The review summarises recent major developments in our understanding of primary biliary cholangitis and its management.