Towards a consensus LC-MS/MS method for the determination of acrylamide in food that prevents overestimation due to interferences

Determination of Acrylamide in Coffee, Cereals, Baby Food, Cocoa, Dry Pet Food, Potato Products, Vegetable Crisps, Biscuits, Tea, Nuts, and Spices by LC-MS/MS in a Single-Laboratory Validation: First Action 2023.01

BACKGROUND

Acrylamide (AA) is a process contaminant naturally formed during the cooking of starchy food at high temperatures. Considering existing risks of misquantification inherent to the analysis of AA, an AOAC initiative raised the need for a consensus standard to determine AA in a broad variety of food.

OBJECTIVE

A quantitative LC-MS/MS method for AA determination in food was validated in a single-laboratory study. Targeted performance requirements in terms of target matrixes, limit of quantification, recovery, and precision were as defined per Standard Method Performance Requirement (SMPR®) 2022.006.

METHOD

The proposed method derives from EN 16618:2015 standard pending modifications brought to the (1) sample preparation (simplified, potentially automated); (2) scope of application (significantly extended); and (3) LC conditions (improved selectivity). Confirmatory detection of AA is conducted by LC-MS/MS in the Selected Reaction Monitoring mode (SRM), and isotopic dilution was applied for quantification approach using either 2,3,3-d3-acrylamide (d3-AA), or 13C3-2,3,3-d3-acrylamide (13C3-d3-AA) as labeled internal standard.

RESULTS

A total of 16 laboratory samples from nine matrix categories were included in the validation process. A full validation was conducted on coffee (instant, roast), infant cereal, cocoa powder, pet food (croquettes), tea (green tea), spices (black pepper), and nuts (roasted almonds) with satisfactory performances both in terms of recovery (97-108%) and precision (RSDr and RSDiR <12%). The method applicability was further demonstrated through the analysis of quality control materials and reference materials including French fries, potato crisps, vegetable crisps, instant coffee, infant food, and biscuits (cookies), with accuracy values determined within a 94-107% range.

CONCLUSIONS

The performances of the presented method are in agreement with the acceptance criteria stipulated in SMPR 2022.006.

HIGHLIGHTS

The Expert Review Panel for acrylamide approved the present method as AOAC Official First Action 2023.01.

A green-footprint approach for parallel multiclass analysis of contaminants in roasted coffee via LC-HRMS

The development and validation of a simple, comprehensive, and environment-friendly procedure to determine pesticide residues, naturally occurring and processing contaminants in roasted coffee is presented. A solid-liquid extraction of pesticides and mycotoxins with ethyl acetate and the concurrent partition of acrylamide to an aqueous phase follows a parallel analytical strategy that requires a single analytical portion to determine contaminants that are typically analyzed by dedicated single residue methods. The partition rules the lipids out of the aqueous extract before an "in-tube" dispersive solid phase microextraction (dSPME) for acrylamide retention. This is followed by the elution with buffer prior to injection. This extract is independently introduced into the system front end followed by the injection of the compounds from the organic phase, yet all spotted in the same run. A novel liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) method setup enables the quantification of 186 compounds at 10 µg/kg, 226 at 5 µg/kg, and the acrylamide at 200 µg/kg for a total of 414 molecules, with acceptable recoveries (70-120%) and precision (RSD < 20%) making this strategy significantly faster and cost-effective than the dedicated single residue methods. Even though the presence of chlorpyrifos, acrylamide, and ochratoxin A was confirmed on samples of different origins, the findings were below the limit of quantification. During the storage of raw coffee, no proof of masking of OTA was found; however, condensation with glucose was evidenced during thermal processing experiments with sucrose by using stable isotope labeling (SIL). No detected conjugates were found in roasted nor in commercial sugar-added torrefacto samples, an industrial processing usually carried out above the decomposition temperature of the disaccharide.

Two decades of research in dietary acrylamide: What do we know today

After nearly two decades since acrylamide was first raised as a potential safety issue in foods, significant progress has been made in understanding its formation during cooking, how to reduce levels in the most concerned foods, and the possible cancer risk to humans. Despite the huge wealth of knowledge gathered on this topic over the past years, a few new discoveries in occurrence, mitigation, analysis and risk assessment are worthy to note. This short review highlights the salient novelties pertaining to acrylamide, particularly in the areas of formation & analysis, existing and possible future regulations in the European Union, and finally considerations that may lead to possibly revisiting the toxicity of acrylamide and the main metabolite, glycidamide.

Acrylamide bioaccessibility in potato and veggie chips. Impact of in vitro colonic fermentation on the non-bioaccessible fraction

Potato-based products contribute largely to the daily intake of acrylamide. In addition to potato crisps, the European Commission has included veggie crisps in the list of foods that should be monitored for their acrylamide content. In the present study, acrylamide content in potato and veggie chips (sweet potato, beetroot and carrot) and their bioaccessibility after in vitro digestion was assessed. The non-bioaccessible fraction was also submitted to in vitro fermentation under colonic conditions. Faecal samples from volunteers of three age groups (children, adolescents and adults) were used to evaluate the microbiota effect on the acrylamide availability. Sweet potato chips exhibited the highest acrylamide content (2342 µg/kg), followed by carrot (1279 µg/kg), beetroot (947 µg/kg) and potato chips (524 µg/kg). After in vitro digestion, acrylamide bioaccessibility was significantly lower in veggie chips (59.7-60.4 %) than in potato chips (71.7 %). Potato and sweet potato chips showed the significantly lowest acrylamide content in the non-bioaccessible fraction (22.8 and 24.1 %, respectively) as compared with beetroot chips (28.4 %). After the fermentation step, acrylamide percentage in the soluble fraction of veggie chips ranged from 43.03 to 71.89 %, the highest values being observed in sweet potato chips fermented with microbiota from children. This fact would involve that the acrylamide was released from the non-bioaccessible fractions by the microbiota. These findings point out that the levels of potentially absorbable acrylamide after the complete gastrointestinal process could be modulated by both the food matrix composition and the microbiota. These factors should be further considered for a more precise risk assessment of dietary acrylamide in humans.

Flour on Gluten-Free Muffins from Different Edible Cassava Varieties in Thailand

In Thailand new edible cassava varieties have been developed to be used in the food industry. The aim of this research was to analyze the difference between flour from three cassava varieties and to evaluate the suitability and quality of flour for gluten-free muffins. The physico-chemical properties of flour from three varieties were studied. The results showed the moisture content of flour was between 10.65 ± 0.01 and 10.85 ± 0.45%. Total protein content was highly significant with a difference of 1.97 ± 0.00%, 2.15 ± 0.01%, and 2.18 ± 0.01%, respectively. Moreover, ash and fat in each flour were highly significant. Amylose content was 19.93 ± 0.47%, and the viscosity was 6286.00 ± 1.52 mPa.s. The color of flour values of L* a* b* value was not statistically different in each variety of flour. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis was used for the biochemical change in flour. The PCA and cluster analysis results revealed that cassava flour from Pirun 6 was different from Pirun 2 and Pirun 4. After that, the test using selected cassava flour from Pirun 6 to test the physical properties and sensory attributes of gluten-free muffins compared with wheat flour found that gluten-free muffins were overall better than basic muffins.