A combination of ceftaroline and daptomycin has synergistic and bactericidal activity in vitro against daptomycin nonsusceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

Phage-antibiotic synergy against daptomycin-nonsusceptible MRSA in an ex vivo simulated endocardial pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model

Phage-antibiotic combinations (PAC) offer a potential solution for treating refractory daptomycin-nonsusceptible (DNS) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. We examined PAC activity against two well-characterized DNS MRSA strains (C4 and C37) in vitro and ex vivo. PACs comprising daptomycin (DAP) ± ceftaroline (CPT) and a two-phage cocktail (Intesti13 + Sb-1) were evaluated for phage-antibiotic synergy (PAS) against high MRSA inoculum (109 CFU/mL) using (i) modified checkerboards (CB), (ii) 24-h time-kill assays (TKA), and (iii) 168-h ex vivo simulated endocardial vegetation (SEV) models. PAS was defined as a fractional inhibitory concentration ≤0.5 in CB minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) or a ≥2 log10 CFU/mL reduction compared to the next best regimen in time-kill assays and SEV models. Significant differences between regimens were assessed by analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc modification (α = 0.05). CB assays revealed PAS with Intesti13 + Sb-1 + DAP ± CPT. In 24-h time-kill assays against C4, Intesti13 + Sb-1 + DAP ± CPT demonstrated synergistic activity (-Δ7.21 and -Δ7.39 log10 CFU/mL, respectively) (P < 0.05 each). Against C37, Intesti13 + Sb-1 + CPT ± DAP was equally effective (-Δ7.14 log10 CFU/mL each) and not significantly different from DAP + Intesti13 + Sb-1 (-Δ6.65 log10 CFU/mL). In 168-h SEV models against C4 and C37, DAP ± CPT + the phage cocktail exerted synergistic activities, significantly reducing bio-burdens to the detection limit [2 log10 CFU/g (-Δ7.07 and -Δ7.11 log10 CFU/g, respectively)] (P < 0.001). At 168 h, both models maintained stable MICs, and no treatment-emergent phage resistance occurred with DAP or DAP + CPT regimens. The two-phage cocktail demonstrated synergistic activity against two DNS MRSA isolates in combination with DAP + CPT in vitro and ex vivo. Further in vivo PAC investigations are needed.

Right-sided infective endocarditis or thrombus? Report of two cases diagnosed by transthoracic echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Right-sided infective endocarditis (RSIE) is a relatively uncommon condition which is difficult to distinguish from thrombus, particularly when the site of infection or the patient's symptoms are atypical. There have been few reports exploring the differential diagnostic and analytical features between RSIE and thrombus.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, we presented two cases of RSIE-one involving the tricuspid valve and the other affecting the pulmonary artery. Notably, the second case was initially misdiagnosed as thrombus based on the findings of by computed tomography angiography(CTA).

CONCLUSIONS

Vegetation and thrombus can be distinguished according to the nature of the mass, its attachment location, and the clinical manifestation. Echocardiography can observe both the location and size of the mass, and the dynamic changes in cardiac hemodynamics and cardiac morphology, thereby facilitating an effective distinction between vegetation and thrombus.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling to inform combination dosing regimens of ceftaroline and daptomycin in special populations

AIMS

The combination of daptomycin and ceftaroline used as salvage therapy is associated with higher survival and decreased clinical failure in complicated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections that are resistant to standard MRSA treatment. This study aimed to evaluate dosing regimens for coadministration of daptomycin and ceftaroline in special populations including paediatrics, renally impaired (RI), obese and geriatrics that generate sufficient coverage against daptomycin-resistant MRSA.

METHODS

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models were developed from pharmacokinetic studies of healthy adults, geriatric, paediatric, obese and RI patients. The predicted profiles were used to evaluate joint probability of target attainment (PTA), as well as tissue-to-plasma ratios.

RESULTS

The adult dosing regimens of 6 mg/kg every (q)24h or q48h daptomycin and 300-600 mg q12h ceftaroline fosamil by RI categories achieved ≥90% joint PTA when the minimum inhibitory concentrations in the combination are at or below 1 and 4 μg/mL against MRSA. In paediatrics, wherein there is no recommended daptomycin dosing regimen for S. aureus bacteraemia, ≥90% joint PTA is achieved when the minimum inhibitory concentrations in the combination are up to 0.5 and 2 μg/mL for standard paediatric dosing regimens of 7 mg/kg q24h daptomycin and 12 mg/kg q8h ceftaroline fosamil. Model predicted tissue-to-plasma ratios of 0.3 and 0.7 in the skin and lung, respectively, for ceftaroline and 0.8 in the skin for daptomycin.

CONCLUSION

Our work illustrates how physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling can inform appropriate dosing of adult and paediatric patients and thereby enable prediction of target attainment in the patients during multitherapies.

Daptomycin synergistic properties from in vitro and in vivo studies: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Daptomycin is a bactericidal lipopeptide antibiotic approved for the treatment of systemic infections (i.e. skin and soft tissue infections, bloodstream infections, infective endocarditis) caused by Gram-positive cocci. It is often prescribed in association with a partner drug to increase its bactericidal effect and to prevent the emergence of resistant strains during treatment; however, its synergistic properties are still under evaluation.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review to offer clinicians an updated overview of daptomycin synergistic properties from in vitro and in vivo studies. Moreover, we reported all in vitro and in vivo data evaluating daptomycin in combination with other antibiotic agents, subdivided by antibiotic classes, and a summary graph presenting the most favourable combinations at a glance.

RESULTS

A total of 92 studies and 1087 isolates (723 Staphylococcus aureus, 68 Staphylococcus epidermidis, 179 Enterococcus faecium, 105 Enterococcus faecalis, 12 Enterococcus durans) were included. Synergism accounted for 30.9% of total interactions, while indifferent effect was the most frequently observed interaction (41.9%). Antagonistic effect accounted for 0.7% of total interactions. The highest synergistic rates against S. aureus were observed with daptomycin in combination with fosfomycin (55.6%). For S. epidermidis and Enterococcus spp., the most effective combinations were daptomycin plus ceftobiprole (50%) and daptomycin plus fosfomycin (63.6%) or rifampicin (62.8%), respectively.

FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

We believe this systematic review could be useful for the future updates of guidelines on systemic infections where daptomycin plays a key role.

Evaluation of the synergistic effect of ceftaroline against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine the synergistic effects of ceftaroline (CPT) in combination with daptomycin (DAP), vancomycin (VAN), or linezolid (LNZ) against various methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains.

METHODS

MRSA strains randomly selected from 2014 to 2018 were studied. Checkerboard titration and in vitro time-kill analyses were used to determine the synergistic activities of the antibiotic combinations.

RESULTS

A total of 10 genetically distinct MRSA strains were included in this study. The checkerboard titration analysis revealed that the CPT-DAP, CPT-VAN, and CPT-LNZ combinations had a synergistic effect against 30%, 10%, and 10% of the selected MRSA strains, respectively. Using time-kill analysis, we showed that CPT-DAP exhibited a significant synergistic and sustained bactericidal effect against both DAP-susceptible (Δ colony-forming units/ml, -5.79; P = 0.0495) and DAP-resistant (Δ colony-forming units/ml, -6.40; P = 0.0463) MRSA strains at a concentration of 0.5 × the minimum inhibitory concentration of CPT plus 0.5 × the minimum inhibitory concentration of DAP. No synergistic bactericidal effects were observed for the CPT-VAN and CPT-LNZ combinations against the selected strains.

CONCLUSION

The CPT-DAP combination showed better synergistic activity than the CPT-VAN and CPT-LNZ combinations against the enrolled MRSA strains. DAP, rather than VAN or LNZ, might be a better choice for CPT combination in the treatment of MRSA infections.

Use of Ceftaroline in Hospitalized Patients with and without COVID-19: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study

A single-center cross-sectional study was conducted to describe the use of ceftaroline in a large teaching hospital in Northern Italy, during a period also including the first months of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The primary objective was to describe the use of ceftaroline in terms of indications and characteristics of patients. A secondary objective was to describe the rate of favorable clinical response in patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA-BSI) receiving ceftaroline. Overall, 200 patients were included in the study. Most of them had COVID-19 (83%, 165/200) and were hospitalized in medical wards (78%, 155/200). Included patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were given empirical ceftaroline in the suspicion of bacterial co-infection or superinfection. Among patients with MRSA-BSI, ceftaroline was used as a first-line therapy and salvage therapy in 25% (3/12) and 75% (9/12) of cases, respectively, and as a monotherapy or in combination with daptomycin in 58% (7/12) and 42% (5/12) of patients, respectively. A favorable response was registered in 67% (8/12) of patients. Improving etiological diagnosis of bacterial infections is essential to optimize the use of ceftaroline in COVID-19 patients. The use of ceftaroline for MRSA-BSI, either as a monotherapy or in combination with other anti-MRSA agents, showed promising rates of favorable response.

New-Generation Antibiotics for Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections: A Review with Focus on Endocarditis and Osteomyelitis

Infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and osteosynthesis-associated infections are mostly caused by Gram-positive bacteria. They are often difficult to treat and are associated with a poor prognosis. In the past 20 years, nine antibiotic drugs with predominant activity against Gram-positive bacteria have been introduced and approved by the Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicines Agency: ceftaroline, daptomycin, telavancin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, linezolid, tedizolid, delafloxacin, and omadacycline. This narrative review aims to provide an overview on these antibiotics with a special focus on their use in infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and osteosynthesis-associated infections. Although some of these approved antibiotics are promising, they should not be used as first- or second-line therapy, awaiting more clinical data.

Vancomycin or Daptomycin Plus a β-Lactam Versus Vancomycin or Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aims: Several in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that adding a β-lactam to vancomycin (VAN) or daptomycin (DAP) can provide synergy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, the results from clinical studies were controversial. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of using VAN or DAP plus a β-lactam (combination therapy) and using VAN or DAP alone (monotherapy) in MRSA bloodstream infections. Methods: We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies evaluating whether combination therapy can improve clinical and microbiological outcomes and safety compared to monotherapy with VAN or DAP in MRSA-related bacteremia. Results: Literature search identified 3 randomized clinical trials and 10 observational studies involving at least 1,796 patients. There were no significant associations between the combination therapy and risk of mortality within 30 days (risk ratios [RRs], 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.46), in-hospital mortality (RR, 0.59, 95% CI, 0.31-1.13) and mortality within 60-90 days (RR, 0.91, 95% CI, 0.64-1.29). There was also no evidence that there was a difference in length of hospital stay between the combination therapy and monotherapy (mean difference, -0.41 days, 95% CI, -3.41 to 2.59). However, compared with monotherapy, combination therapy seemed to have a shorter duration of bacteremia(mean difference, -1.06 days, 95% CI, -1.53 to -0.60), a lower risk of persistent bacteremia (RR, 0.63, 95% CI, 0.51-0.79) and a lower risk of bacteremia recurrence within 60-90 days (RR, 0.61, 95% CI, 0.40-0.92). There were no statistically significant differences in the total number of adverse events, including acute kidney injury (AKI) (RR, 1.52, 95% CI, 0.84-2.73), thrombocytopenia (RR, 1.13, 95% CI, 0.74-1.73), and diarrhea (RR, 1.36, 95% CI, 0.70-2.65), between patients with combination therapy and monotherapy. In subgroup analysis, when the analysis was limited to the studies comparing using DAP plus ceftaroline with monotherapy, we found that the former had a lower risk of mortality within 30 days. In addition, a subgroup analysis limited to randomized clinical trials showed that the combination therapy was associated with a higher risk of AKI compared with using VAN or DAP alone. Conclusions: Although adding a β-lactam to standard therapy seemed to experience a higher clearance compared with monotherapy in patients with MRSA bacteremia, the combination therapy did not increase survival benefits. Based on the available evidence, the combination therapy was not supported as the routine management of MRSA-related bacteremia, and both its harms and benefits should be taken into account.

Discerning the role of polymicrobial biofilms in the ascent, prevalence, and extent of heteroresistance in clinical practice

Antimicrobial therapy is facing a worrisome and underappreciated challenge, the phenomenon of heteroresistance (HR). HR has been gradually documented in clinically relevant pathogens (e.g. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Burkholderia spp., Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Candida spp.) towards several drugs and is believed to complicate the clinical picture of chronic infections. This type of infections are typically mediated by polymicrobial biofilms, wherein microorganisms inherently display a wide range of physiological states, distinct metabolic pathways, diverging refractory levels of stress responses, and a complex network of chemical signals exchange. This review aims to provide an overview on the relevance, prevalence, and implications of HR in clinical settings. Firstly, related terminologies (e.g. resistance, tolerance, persistence), sometimes misunderstood and overlapped, were clarified. Factors generating misleading HR definitions were also uncovered. Secondly, the recent HR incidences reported in clinically relevant pathogens towards different antimicrobials were annotated. The potential mechanisms underlying such occurrences were further elucidated. Finally, the link between HR and biofilms was discussed. The focus was to recognize the presence of heterogeneous levels of resistance within most biofilms, as well as the relevance of polymicrobial biofilms in chronic infectious diseases and their role in resistance spreading. These topics were subject of a critical appraisal, gaining insights into the ascending clinical implications of HR in antimicrobial resistance spreading, which could ultimately help designing effective therapeutic options.

Single nucleotide polymorphism leads to daptomycin resistance causing amino acid substitution-T345I in MprF of clinically isolated MRSA strains

Daptomycin (DAP) is one of the most potent antibiotics used for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Due to an increase in its administration for combating MRSA infections, DAP non-susceptible (DAP-NS) MRSA strains have recently been reported in clinical settings. The presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the multiple peptide resistance factor (mprF) gene is the most frequently reported cause for the evolution of DAP-NS MRSA strains; however, there are some variations of SNPs that could lead to DAP-NS. In this study, we used two clinical MRSA strains, including DAP susceptible (DAP-S) and DAP-NS, isolated from the same patient at different time points. We introduced T345I SNP to mprF of the DAP-S MRSA strain using the gene exchange method with pIMAY vector. Further, we investigated the phenotype of the mutant strain, including drug susceptibility, cell surface positive charge, and growth speed. The mutant strain exhibited (i) resistance to DAP, (ii) up-regulation of positive surface charge, (iii) slower growth speed, and (iv) thickened cell walls. Hence, the SNP in mprF may have caused an up-regulation in MprF function, with a subsequent increase in positive surface charge. Cumulatively, these results demonstrated that the T345I amino acid substitution in mprF represents one of the primary causes of DAP-NS in MRSA strains.

Potentials of nanotechnology in treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Abuse of antibiotics has led to the emergence of drug-resistant pathogens. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was reported just two years after the clinical use of methicillin, which can cause severe infections with high morbidity and mortality in both community and hospital. The treatment of MRSA infection is greatly challenging since it has developed the resistance to almost all types of antibiotics. As such, it is of great significance and importance to develop novel therapeutic approaches. The fast development of nanotechnology provides a promising solution to this dilemma. Functional nanomaterials and nanoparticles can act either as drug carriers or as antibacterial agents for antibacterial therapy. Herein, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the drug resistance mechanisms of MRSA and discuss the potential applications of some functionalized nanomaterials in anti-MRSA therapy. Also, the concerns and possible solutions for the nanomaterials-based anti-MRSA therapy are discussed.

Comparing the Outcomes of Ceftaroline Plus Vancomycin or Daptomycin Combination Therapy Versus Monotherapy in Adults with Complicated and Prolonged Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia Initially Treated with Supplemental Ceftaroline

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia confers considerable morbidity and mortality. Although vancomycin or daptomycin monotherapy is usually curative, prolonged bacteremia necessitating supplemental ceftaroline has occurred. The practice has led to the question of whether to continue with ceftaroline following bacteremia resolution.

METHODS

Adult patients hospitalized with MRSA bacteremia at the University of Kentucky Medical Center between January 2015 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Study subjects required supplemental ceftaroline due to 4 or more days of bacteremia despite vancomycin or daptomycin. They additionally had accompanying native valve infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, or brain abscess. Patients were divided into two cohorts. One group continued with ceftaroline plus vancomycin or daptomycin following bacteremia resolution (combination therapy group). The other group received vancomycin or daptomycin alone (monotherapy group). All involved received 6-8 weeks of therapy. Patients' Pitt bacteremia score (PBS) and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) values were calculated. Treatment outcomes of inpatient mortality, recurrence of bacteremia, 30-day readmission, acute kidney injury, and leukopenia were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients comprised the study population. 15 patients were assigned to each cohort. The median PBS value of the combination therapy group was 2, compared with 1 among the monotherapy group. The median CCI score of both groups was 0. No statistically significant difference in the aforementioned treatment outcomes was seen between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In subjects with complicated and prolonged MRSA bacteremia requiring supplemental ceftaroline, clinical outcomes did not differ among patients prescribed vancomycin or daptomycin alone following bacteremia resolution versus patients who continued combination therapy.

Adjunctive ceftaroline in combination with daptomycin or vancomycin for complicated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia after monotherapy failure

Background:

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSA-B) may fail to improve with standard monotherapy, particularly in patients with multifocal infection, incomplete source control, or persistent bacteremia. Synergy observed in vitro between ceftaroline (CPT) and daptomycin (DAP) or vancomycin (VAN) may translate into clinical benefit. Here, we describe our experience with DAP/CPT and VAN/CPT for complicated MRSA-B after monotherapy failure.

Methods:

Single-center, retrospective review of consecutive patients treated with DAP/CPT or VAN/CPT for MRSA-B after monotherapy failure from 1 January 2016 to 30 November 2018.

Results:

We identified 11 instances of combination therapy in 10 patients (DAP/CPT = 6, VAN/CPT = 5) with 1 patient receiving VAN/CPT followed by DAP/CPT. Rates of multifocal infection, incomplete source control, persistent bacteremia, and infective endocarditis were high (100%, 80%, 60%, and 60%, respectively). Combination therapy was initiated most commonly for persistent bacteremia (60%). When patients were persistently bacteremic, median preceding duration was 13 days and median time to clearance was 3 days. Total microbiologic cure rate was 100%. There were zero instances of bacteremia relapse at 30 days (30D) or 60 days (60D). All-cause 30D and 60D mortality rates were 11.1% and 33.3%, respectively.

Conclusions:

Combination therapy demonstrated success in diverse cases of refractory MRSA-B, including instances of persistent bacteremia paired with incomplete source control. Optimal timing and therapeutic cadence for combination therapy remain unclear. Our findings suggest that DAP/CPT and VAN/CPT can be considered for complicated MRSA bacteremia when other treatment options fail or are unavailable. We propose persistent bacteremia with incomplete source control to be a clinical niche particularly worthy of further investigation.

Genotypic analysis of Italian MRSA strains exhibiting low-level ceftaroline and ceftobiprole resistance

The aim of this study was to address the involvement of PBP mutations in the bactericidal activity to novel cephalosporins, alone and in combination with daptomycin, in not-related multidrug-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated during a nationwide Italian survey. MICs determination and time-killing assays were performed and mecA, pbp1, pbp2, pbp3, pbp4, and gdpP genes were sequenced. Ten strains showed low-level resistance to ceftaroline and ceftobiprole. PBP2a sequence analysis identified four different mutations (N146K; N204K; T235I; E239K) uniquely present in the non-penicillin-binding domain (nPBD). Epidemiologically, this resistance was associated with the most widespread MDR Italian clone ST228-SCCmecI-t001/t041, confirming its proclivity to accumulate mutations, and it is also associated to substitutions in the GdpP signaling protein, involved in the maintenance of di-AMP balance, recently associated with resistance to beta-lactams. Despite these mutations, both drugs retained their potent in vitro bactericidal activity and showed a synergistic effect towards difficult-to-treat isolates.

Successful treatment with daptomycin and ceftaroline of MDR Staphylococcus aureus native valve endocarditis: a case report

OBJECTIVES

The best therapeutic approach for treating MRSA endocarditis remains unknown, particularly in cases of high vancomycin MICs. We report here a case of daptomycin-non-susceptible, ceftaroline-resistant and fosfomycin-resistant MRSA native left valve endocarditis that was successfully treated with valve repair and a combination of high-dose daptomycin and ceftaroline.

METHODS

Antimicrobial testing of the clinical strain was performed using Etest and microdilution broth methods. Time-kill and chequerboard methodologies were used to test the activity of antibiotic combinations.

RESULTS

By Etest, the MIC of vancomycin was 2 mg/L, the MIC of daptomycin was 2 mg/L, the MIC of fosfomycin was 1024 mg/L and the MIC of ceftaroline was 1.5 mg/L. At the standard inoculum (105 cfu/mL), the three combinations of daptomycin plus ceftaroline, cloxacillin or fosfomycin were synergistic and bactericidal. However, when these combinations were tested using a higher inoculum (108 cfu/mL), all combinations were synergistic, but only daptomycin plus ceftaroline had bactericidal activity.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirmed a synergistic effect between daptomycin plus ceftaroline and increased bactericidal activity against MRSA, suggesting that this combination may be effective for the treatment of invasive MRSA infection. Our experience highlights the potential clinical use of synergy testing to guide difficult treatment decisions in patients with MDR MRSA infection.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in solid organ transplantation-Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

These updated guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice review the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in solid organ transplantation. Despite an increasing armamentarium of antimicrobials active against MRSA, improved diagnostic tools, and overall declining rates of infection, MRSA infections remain a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Pre- and post-transplant MRSA colonization is a significant risk factor for post-transplant MRSA infection. The preferred initial treatment of MRSA bacteremia remains vancomycin. Hand hygiene, chlorhexidine bathing in the ICU, central-line bundles that focus on reducing unnecessary catheter use, disinfection of patient equipment, and the environment along with antimicrobial stewardship are all aspects of an infection prevention approach to prevent MRSA transmission and decrease healthcare-associated infections.

Multifunctional Pharmaceutical Effects of the Antibiotic Daptomycin

Daptomycin (DAP), a cyclic lipopeptide produced by Streptomyces roseosporus, is a novel antibiotic to clinically treat various Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria-induced infections. Although DAP has a strong broad-spectrum bactericidal effect, recently rare bacterial antibiotic resistance against DAP gradually arises. The review is to summarize the normal indications of DAP, its off-label usage against several clinical pathogen infections, the unique antibacterial mechanisms of DAP, and the combination of antibiotic therapies for highly DAP-resistant pathogens. More noticeably, rising evidences demonstrate that DAP has new potential activity of anticancer and immunomodulatory effects. So far the multifunctional pharmaceutical effects of DAP deserve to be further explored for future clinical applications.

A Mini-Review on Ceftaroline in Bacteremia Patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infections

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to describe the outcomes of patients treated with ceftaroline in the non-Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved indication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in both pediatric and adult populations.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic overview was conducted by searching PubMed, Medline, and The Cochrane Library up to January 2019.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All English-language clinical trials and case reports related to the efficacy of ceftaroline in new, not-yet-approved FDA indications in MRSA infections in pediatric or adult populations.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In the case of MRSA bacteremia (MRSAB) infections, three different randomized studies in pediatric patients showed effectiveness of ceftaroline. When used in the case of adult populations with MRSA bacteremia, a small trial of 16 patients showed 50% clinical success in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections versus 63% clinical success in patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Another case series of six refractory case reports showed 50% clinical success of ceftaroline in patients with MRSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there are few case reports and limited data to date, ceftaroline fosamil should continue to be studied as an alternative therapy in MRSA infections in both pediatric and adult populations. Clinical success rates of ceftaroline were, in most cases, considered high when treating patients with MRSA infection. More clinical trials need to be studied. In the specific case of MRSA bacteremia, the treatment options remain few and ceftaroline should be extensively studied for the salvage treatment of MRSAB.

Current and emerging pharmacotherapy for the treatment of infections following open-heart surgery

INTRODUCTION

Patients undergoing open-heart surgery may suffer from postoperative complications, including severe infections. Antimicrobials to treat infectious complications in this population should be selected thoughtfully, taking into account three different and fundamental issues: (i) the site of infection; (ii) the suspected or proven causative agent and its susceptibility pattern; and (iii) the risk of suboptimal pharmacokinetic characteristics and potential toxicity of the chosen drug/s.

AREAS COVERED

The present narrative review summarizes the current and future antimicrobial options for the treatment of infections developing after open-heart surgery.

EXPERT OPINION

The pharmacological treatment of infections developing in cardiac surgery patients poses peculiar challenges, including the need for an active empirical therapy for severe events such as bloodstream infections, deep sternal wound infections, or early-onset postoperative prosthetic endocarditis. In addition, the risk for multidrug-resistant pathogens should also be taken into account in endemic areas. A multidisciplinary evaluation on a patient-by-patient basis, deeply involving infectious diseases specialists and cardiothoracic surgeons, remains essential for appropriately balancing both short-term and long-term risks and benefits of any possible surgical reintervention in combination with adequate pharmacotherapy.

A successful salvage therapy with daptomycin and linezolid for right-sided infective endocarditis and septic pulmonary embolism caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Although vancomycin administration is recommended for the treatment of infective endocarditis (IE) caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), it is unclear whether an alternative agent, daptomycin, can be used to treat IE with pulmonary complications. A 26-year-old female who had undergone surgical repair of a ventricular septal defect as an early teenager presented with fever, headache, and vomiting. She was admitted to our hospital and diagnosed with right-sided IE with septic pulmonary embolism caused by MRSA. Vancomycin, rifampicin, and gentamicin were administered; however, exacerbation of drug eruption due to the antimicrobial agents on the 11th day led us to switch from vancomycin and rifampicin to daptomycin. Furthermore, we included linezolid to treat lung abscesses that accompanied the septic pulmonary embolism. We confirmed negative blood cultures on the 18th day. On the same day, a patch closure for the ventricular septal defect and tricuspid valve replacement were performed. She was discharged on the 65th day with an uneventful postoperative course. This experience suggests that daptomycin and linezolid are effective salvage therapies for right-sided IE caused by MRSA and accompanied by pulmonary complications.

Incidence, prevalence, and management of MRSA bacteremia across patient populations-a review of recent developments in MRSA management and treatment

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection is still a major global healthcare problem. Of concern is S. aureus bacteremia, which exhibits high rates of morbidity and mortality and can cause metastatic or complicated infections such as infective endocarditis or sepsis. MRSA is responsible for most global S. aureus bacteremia cases, and compared with methicillin-sensitive S. aureus, MRSA infection is associated with poorer clinical outcomes. S. aureus virulence is affected by the unique combination of toxin and immune-modulatory gene products, which may differ by geographic location and healthcare- or community-associated acquisition. Management of S. aureus bacteremia involves timely identification of the infecting strain and source of infection, proper choice of antibiotic treatment, and robust prevention strategies. Resistance and nonsusceptibility to first-line antimicrobials combined with a lack of equally effective alternatives complicates MRSA bacteremia treatment. This review describes trends in epidemiology and factors that influence the incidence of MRSA bacteremia. Current and developing diagnostic tools, treatments, and prevention strategies are also discussed.