Management of candidaemia with reference to the European confederation of medical mycology quality indicators

Adjunctive Diagnostic Studies Completed Following Detection of Candidemia in Children: Secondary Analysis of Observed Practice From a Multicenter Cohort Study Conducted by the Pediatric Fungal Network

BACKGROUND

Adjunctive diagnostic studies (aDS) are recommended to identify occult dissemination in patients with candidemia. Patterns of evaluation with aDS across pediatric settings are unknown.

METHODS

Candidemia episodes were included in a secondary analysis of a multicenter comparative effectiveness study that prospectively enrolled participants age 120 days to 17 years with invasive candidiasis (predominantly candidemia) from 2014 to 2017. Ophthalmologic examination (OE), abdominal imaging (AbdImg), echocardiogram, neuroimaging, and lumbar puncture (LP) were performed per clinician discretion. Adjunctive diagnostic studies performance and positive results were determined per episode, within 30 days from candidemia onset. Associations of aDS performance with episode characteristics were evaluated via mixed-effects logistic regression.

RESULTS

In 662 pediatric candidemia episodes, 490 (74%) underwent AbdImg, 450 (68%) OE, 426 (64%) echocardiogram, 160 (24%) neuroimaging, and 76 (11%) LP; performance of each aDS per episode varied across sites up to 16-fold. Longer durations of candidemia were associated with undergoing OE, AbdImg, and echocardiogram. Immunocompromised status (58% of episodes) was associated with undergoing AbdImg (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.38; 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] 1.51-3.74). Intensive care at candidemia onset (30% of episodes) was associated with undergoing echocardiogram (aOR 2.42; 95% CI 1.51-3.88). Among evaluated episodes, positive OE was reported in 15 (3%), AbdImg in 30 (6%), echocardiogram in 14 (3%), neuroimaging in 9 (6%), and LP in 3 (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show heterogeneity in practice, with some clinicians performing aDS selectively, potentially influenced by clinical factors. The low frequency of positive results suggests that targeted application of aDS is warranted.

A Dedicated Mycosis Flask Increases the Likelihood of Identifying Candidemia Sepsis

Introduction: Candidemia is a severe condition associated with high mortality, and fungi are often not covered by empiric antimicrobial regimes for sepsis. Therefore, the shortest possible time to detection of yeast in the blood is of the essence. Materials and methods: We performed a cohort study of blood culture flasks drawn from patients aged 18 or older in the capital region of Denmark. In 2018 a blood cultures set consisted of two aerobic and two anaerobic flasks. This was changed in 2020 to two aerobic, one anaerobic, and one mycosis flask. We used time-to-event statistics to model time to positivity and compared 2018 with 2020; further, we stratified analyses on the blood culture system used (BacTAlert™ vs. BACTEC™) and high-risk vs. low-risk departments. Results: We included 175,416 blood culture sets and 107,077 unique patients. We found an absolute difference in the likelihood of identifying fungi in a blood culture set of 1.2 (95% CI: 0.72; 1.6) pr. 1.000 blood culture sets corresponding to the number needed to treat 853 (617; 1382). In high-risk departments, the absolute difference was profound, whereas it was negligible and statistically non-significant in low-risk departments 5.2 (95% CI: 3.4; 7.1) vs. 0.16 (−0.17; 0.48) pr. 1.000 blood culture sets. Conclusions: We found that including a mycosis flask in a blood culture set increases the likelihood of identifying candidemia. The effect was mainly seen in high-risk departments.

EQUAL CPA Score 2022: a tool to measure guideline adherence for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis

BACKGROUND

Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) can complicate underlying pulmonary diseases, and clinical management of CPA is challenging. Guidelines support clinicians but due to the complexity of the disease they can be difficult to adhere to.

OBJECTIVES

To map current guideline recommendations for the clinical management of CPA into a scoring tool to facilitate and quantify guideline adherence in clinical practice.

METHODS

Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of CPA presented in the current ESCMID/ERS/ECMM and CPAnet guidance documents were assembled and weighed on the basis of their strength of recommendation and level of evidence.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven recommendations were identified, resulting in a total maximum EQUAL CPA Score of 51. For diagnostics (ScoreMax = 27), a strong emphasis on expert consultation, culture, direct microscopy, histopathology, serology and imaging was reflected in respective points, whereas molecular techniques and susceptibility testing count into the diagnostics score to a lesser extent.Ten treatment recommendations (ScoreMax = 14), including antifungal therapy, therapeutic drug monitoring and treatment duration, were identified. Surgery, where indicated, adds three points. For refractory disease or intolerance of first-line antifungal treatment, optimal second-line treatment added another two points.During follow-up (ScoreMax = 10), response assessment via imaging gave three points, while culture and serology added two points each to the ScoreMax.

CONCLUSION

The EQUAL CPA Score intents to be used as a comprehensive tool for measuring guideline adherence. If adherence to current guidelines is associated with clinical outcome, this will be assessed in future studies.

The Utility of EQUAL Candida Score in Predicting Mortality in Patients with Candidemia

In an effort to standardize practice, the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) developed the European Confederation of Medical Mycology Quality of Clinical Candidaemia Management (EQUAL) Candida score. This study investigated the utility of the EQUAL Candida score in predicting mortality in patients with candidemia admitted between January 2004 and July 2019. A total of 142 cases were included in the study, and 43.6% died within 30 days of candidemia diagnosis. There were no significant differences between survivors and non-survivors in terms of comorbidities predisposing to candidemia, except for malignancy (p = 0.021). The overall mean EQUAL score was 11.5 in the total population and 11.8 ± 3.82 and 11.03 ± 4.59 in survivors and non-survivors, respectively. When patients with a central venous catheter (CVC) were considered alone, survivors were found to have significantly higher scores than non-survivors (13.1 ± 3.19 vs. 11.3 ± 4.77, p = 0.025). When assessing components of the EQUAL Score separately, only candida speciation (p = 0.013), susceptibility testing (p = 0.012) and echocardiography results (p = 0.012) were significantly associated with a lower case-fatality rate. A higher EQUAL Candida score was able to predict a lower case-fatality rate in patients with a CVC.

EQUAL Candida score, an effective tool for predicting the outcomes of Candida tropicalis candidaemia: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Candida tropicalis is the most common non-albicans Candida species found in Asia-Pacific countries, including Thailand. The pathogen is known for its great virulence, which causes a high case-fatality rate. Associations between case fatality and patient characteristics, infectious disease unit consultation, and EQUAL Candida score were investigated.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted with 160 cases of C. tropicalis bloodstream infection between 2015 and 2019 at a single, large, tertiary centre in Thailand. Clinical characteristics, clinical presentations, patient outcomes (30-day case-fatality rate) and independent predictive factors were analysed.

RESULTS

The 30-day case-fatality rate was 68.1%. The median of the EQUAL Candida score was 8. Independent factors for the prediction of case fatality were septic shock (hazard ratio, 1.84), the use of mechanical ventilation (hazard ratio, 2.03) and the EQUAL Candida score (hazard ratio, 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive factors for 30-day case fatality were septic shock, mechanical ventilation use and the EQUAL Candida score. It is recommended that the EQUAL score be considered for patients infected with C. tropicalis candidaemia to reduce the case-fatality rate.

Attributable Mortality of Candida Bloodstream Infections in the Modern Era: A Propensity Score Analysis

BACKGROUND

This study quantifies the mortality attributable to Candida bloodstream infections (BSI) in the modern era of echinocandins.

DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to Barnes Jewish Hospital, a 1,368-bed tertiary care academic hospital, in Saint Louis, Missouri from 1/2/2012-4/30/2019. We identified 626 adult patients with Candida BSI that were frequency-matched with 6,269 control patients that had similar Candida BSI risk-factors. The 90-day all-cause mortality attributable to Candida BSI was calculated using three methods-propensity score matching, matching by inverse weighting of propensity score, and stratified analysis by quintile.

RESULTS

The 90-day crude mortality was 42.4% (269 patients) for Candida BSI cases and 17.1% (1,083 patients) for frequency-matched controls. Following propensity score-matching, the attributable risk difference for 90-day mortality was 28.4% with hazard ratio (HR) of 2.12 (95% CI, 1.98-2.25, p<0.001). In the stratified analysis, the risk for mortality at 90 days was highest in patients in the lowest risk quintile to develop Candida BSI (HR 3.13 (95% CI, 2.33-4.19). Patients in this lowest risk quintile accounted for 81(61%) of the 130 untreated patients with Candida BSI. Sixty nine percent of untreated patients (57/83) died versus 35% of (49/127) of treated patients (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with Candida BSI continue to experience high mortality. Mortality attributable to Candida BSI was more pronounced in patients at lowest risk to develop Candida BSI. A higher proportion of these low-risk patients went untreated, experienced higher mortality, and should be the target of aggressive interventions to ensure timely, effective treatment.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Invasive infections due to Trichosporon spp. are life-threatening opportunistic fungal infections that require complex clinical management. Guidelines assist clinicians but can be challenging to comply with.

Objectives

To develop a scoring tool to facilitate and quantify adherence to current guideline recommendations for invasive trichosporonosis.

Methods

We reviewed the current guideline for managing rare yeast infections (ECMM, ISHAM and ASM). The most important recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up were assembled and weighted according to their strength of recommendation and level of evidence. Additional items considered highly relevant for clinical management were also included.

Results

The resulting EQUAL Trichosporon Score 2022 comprises 18 items, with a maximum score of 39 points. For diagnostics, seven or eight items, depending on whether organ involvement is present or not, apply, resulting in a maximum of 18 or 21 points. Recommendations on diagnostics include imaging, infectious diseases expert consultation, culture, microscopy, molecular techniques, histopathology, and susceptibility testing. For treatment, six recommendations with a maximum of ten points were identified, with two additional points for organ involvement and one point for second-line treatment in uncontrolled disease. Treatment recommendations include immediate initiation, source control, pharmacological treatment, therapeutic drug monitoring, treatment duration and surgical intervention. Follow-up comprises two items with five points maximum, covering follow-up blood cultures and imaging.

Conclusions

The EQUAL Trichosporon Score weighs and aggregates factors recommended for optimal management of Trichosporon infections. It provides a tool for antifungal stewardship as well as for measuring guideline adherence, but remains to be correlated with patient outcomes.

EQUAL Score Scedosporiosis/Lomentosporiosis 2021: a European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) tool to quantify guideline adherence

Background

Invasive scedosporiosis and lomentosporiosis are life-threatening fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with complex diagnostic and treatment patterns.

Objectives

To develop a scoring tool to facilitate and quantify adherence to current guideline recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of invasive scedosporiosis and lomentosporiosis.

Methods

Experts from European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) excellence centres reviewed current guidelines for scedosporiosis and lomentosporiosis. Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up were summarized, assembled and weighted according to their strength of recommendation and level of evidence (strongly recommended = 3 points; moderately recommended = 2 points; marginally recommended = 1 point; recommended against = 0 points). Additional items considered of high importance for clinical management were also weighted.

Results

A total of 170 recommendations were identified. A 21-item tool was developed and embedded into the EQUAL score card. Nine items for diagnosis with 18 achievable points were assembled. For treatment, three general recommendation items with a maximal score of 9 were identified, while for specific antifungal treatment the two fungal pathogens were separated. Three and four items were established for scedosporiosis and lomentosporiosis, respectively, with a maximum achievable score of 3 due to the separation of different treatment options with the maximum point value of 3 for voriconazole-based treatment. Follow-up comprised two items (4 points maximum). Key recommendations for clinical outcome were weighted accordingly.

Conclusions

We propose the EQUAL Score Scedosporiosis/Lomentosporiosis to quantify adherence to current guideline recommendations for management of these rare infections. The score remains to be validated in real-life patient cohorts and correlated with patient outcome.

Risk factors of septic shock development and thirty-day mortality with a predictive model in adult candidemia patients in intensive care units

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate factors associated with septic shock development and 30-day mortality outcome with a prediction model among adult candidemia patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted among patients admitted to the ICU from 2009 to 2018 at a tertiary care medical centre. The study subjects included adult patients ≥ 19 years with candidemia treated with antifungal agent for ≥ 3 days. Clinical variables were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were included in the study. Of these patients, 32 patients (25.4%) had septic shock. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that chronic liver disease was associated with septic shock (odds ratio [OR] 3.372, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.057 - 10.057). The rate of 30-day mortality was 35.7% and the associated mortality risk factors were malignancy (OR 8.251, 95% CI 2.227 - 30.573), chronic liver disease (OR 3.605, 95% CI 0.913 - 14.227), haemodialysis (OR 8.479, 95% CI 1.801 - 39.924), mycological failure (OR 29.675, 95% CI 7.012 - 125.578), and septic shock (OR 3.980, 95% CI 1.238 - 12.796). A predictive model for 30-day mortality was created based on the mortality risk factor scores, which had an area of 0.862 under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

CONCLUSIONS

Adult candidemia patients in the ICU who have chronic liver disease may be at higher risk of developing septic shock. Furthermore, our predictive model for 30-day mortality based on the mortality risk factors may be useful for clinical assessment.

European confederation of medical mycology quality of clinical candidaemia management score: A review of the points based best practice recommendations

Candidaemia is associated with high mortality. In the last few years, several guidelines have been published on the management of Candida bloodstream infection. However, adherence to the practice guidelines has been suboptimal. In order to facilitate and objectively measure the adherence to good practice recommendations, a scoring criterion was published by the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM). The ECMM Quality (EQUAL) of Clinical Candidaemia Management is an audit tool that comprises of 10 quality indicators. Each quality indicator is allotted between 1 and 3 points. The maximum achievable score is 22 or 19 in patients with or without a central venous catheter, respectively. This paper reviews each of the 10 quality indicators and provides the context for improving quality within the individual domains. The review also suggests areas that are in need of further clarity or areas which merit attention in the future updates of the EQUAL scoring system so that clinicians are able to derive maximum benefit from the audit tool. The EQUAL scoring tool is an important milestone in the quality improvement aspect of the management of candidaemia and contributes to the various components of clinical governance in the management of Candida infection of the bloodstream.

Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 12: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2020

The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) was developed to provide a generic safety evaluation for biological agents to support EFSA's Scientific Panels. It is based on an assessment of the taxonomic identity, the body of knowledge, safety concerns and antimicrobial resistance. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit (TU) are where possible to be confirmed at strain or product level, reflected by 'qualifications'. No new information was found that would change the previously recommended QPS TUs of the 39 microorganisms notified to EFSA between October 2019 and March 2020, 33 were excluded, including five filamentous fungi, five Escherichia coli, two Enterococcus faecium, two Streptomyces spp. and 19 TUs already evaluated. Six TUs were evaluated. Akkermansia muciniphila was not recommended for QPS status due to safety concerns. Clostridium butyricum was not recommended because some strains contain pathogenicity factors. This TU was excluded for further QPS evaluation. Galdieria sulphuraria and Pseudomonas chlororaphis were also rejected due to a lack of body of knowledge. The QPS status of Corynebacterium ammoniagenes (with the qualification 'for production purposes only') and of Komagataella pastoris (with the qualification 'for enzyme production') was confirmed. In relation to the taxonomic revision of the Lactobacillus genus, previously designated Lactobacillus species will be reassigned to the new species and both the old and new names will be retained in the QPS list.

Usefulness of EQUAL Candida Score for predicting outcomes in patients with candidaemia: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) Quality of Clinical Candidaemia Management (EQUAL) score is a tool designed by the ECMM to measure guideline adherence. The current study investigated the association between EQUAL scores and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in three hospitals in Taiwan. Patients with candidaemia between January 2014 and July 2018 were enrolled. Guideline adherence was evaluated using EQUAL score indicators. Clinical outcomes and predictors of 30-day mortality were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 384 patients were enrolled. The overall mean EQUAL score was 8.91 ± 3.42 (9.42 ± 3.60 in survivors vs. 8.10 ± 2.94 in non-survivors, p < 0.001). Higher scores were positively correlated with survival (p < 0.001). Scores of 16-22 indicated the highest survival rates (p for trend <0.001). The Kaplan-Meier plot revealed that patients with EQUAL scores ≥10 exhibited significantly higher survival rates (p < 0.001) than those with scores <10. Multivariable analysis revealed that EQUAL scores ≥10 (odds ratio (OR) 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19-0.74), advanced age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04), septic shock (OR 4.42, 95% CI 2.09-9.36), high sequential organ failure assessment scores (OR 4.28, 95% CI 2.15-8.52), intravascular catheter-related source (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.94) and central venous catheter retention (OR 5.41, 95% CI 2.06-14.24) were independent predictors of 30-day mortality.

DISCUSSION

Greater guideline adherence with a higher EQUAL score was significantly associated with survival. An EQUAL score cutoff point <10 predicted 30-day mortality.