GTP hydrolysis by complexes of the signal recognition particle and the signal recognition particle receptor

Membrane protein biogenesis at the ER: the highways and byways

The Sec61 complex is the major protein translocation channel of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where it plays a central role in the biogenesis of membrane and secretory proteins. Whilst Sec61-mediated protein translocation is typically coupled to polypeptide synthesis, suggestive of significant complexity, an obvious characteristic of this core translocation machinery is its surprising simplicity. Over thirty years after its initial discovery, we now understand that the Sec61 complex is in fact the central piece of an elaborate jigsaw puzzle, which can be partly solved using new research findings. We propose that the Sec61 complex acts as a dynamic hub for co-translational protein translocation at the ER, proactively recruiting a range of accessory complexes that enhance and regulate its function in response to different protein clients. It is now clear that the Sec61 complex does not have a monopoly on co-translational insertion, with some transmembrane proteins preferentially utilising the ER membrane complex instead. We also have a better understanding of post-insertion events, where at least one membrane-embedded chaperone complex can capture the newly inserted transmembrane domains of multi-span proteins and co-ordinate their assembly into a native structure. Having discovered this array of Sec61-associated components and competitors, our next challenge is to understand how they act together in order to expand the range and complexity of the membrane proteins that can be synthesised at the ER. Furthermore, this diversity of components and pathways may open up new opportunities for targeted therapeutic interventions designed to selectively modulate protein biogenesis at the ER.

Targeting and Insertion of Membrane Proteins

The insertion and assembly of proteins into the inner membrane of bacteria are crucial for many cellular processes, including cellular respiration, signal transduction, and ion and pH homeostasis. This process requires efficient membrane targeting and insertion of proteins into the lipid bilayer in their correct orientation and proper conformation. Playing center stage in these events are the targeting components, signal recognition particle (SRP) and the SRP receptor FtsY, as well as the insertion components, the Sec translocon and the YidC insertase. Here, we will discuss new insights provided from the recent high-resolution structures of these proteins. In addition, we will review the mechanism by which a variety of proteins with different topologies are inserted into the inner membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. Finally, we report on the energetics of this process and provide information on how membrane insertion occurs in Gram-positive bacteria and Archaea. It should be noted that most of what we know about membrane protein assembly in bacteria is based on studies conducted in Escherichia coli.

Anionic Phospholipids and the Albino3 Translocase Activate Signal Recognition Particle-Receptor Interaction during Light-harvesting Chlorophyll a/b-binding Protein Targeting

The universally conserved signal recognition particle (SRP) co-translationally delivers newly synthesized membrane and secretory proteins to the target cellular membrane. The only exception is found in the chloroplast of green plants, where the chloroplast SRP (cpSRP) post-translationally targets light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins (LHCP) to the thylakoid membrane. The mechanism and regulation of this post-translational mode of targeting by cpSRP remain unclear. Using biochemical and biophysical methods, here we show that anionic phospholipids activate the cpSRP receptor cpFtsY to promote rapid and stable cpSRP54·cpFtsY complex assembly. Furthermore, the stromal domain of the Alb3 translocase binds with high affinity to and regulates GTP hydrolysis in the cpSRP54·cpFtsY complex, suggesting that cpFtsY is primarily responsible for initial recruitment of the targeting complex to Alb3. These results suggest a new model for the sequential recruitment, remodeling, and unloading of the targeting complex at membrane translocase sites in the post-translational cpSRP pathway.

Consequences of impaired purine recycling on the proteome in a cellular model of Lesch-Nyhan disease

The importance of specific pathways of purine metabolism for normal brain function is highlighted by several inherited disorders, such as Lesch-Nyhan disease (LND). In this disorder, deficiency of the purine recycling enzyme, hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HGprt), causes severe neurological and behavioral abnormalities. Despite many years of research, the mechanisms linking the defect in purine recycling to the neurobehavioral abnormalities remain unclear. In the current studies, an unbiased approach to the identification of potential mechanisms was undertaken by examining changes in protein expression in a model of HGprt deficiency based on the dopaminergic rat PC6-3 line, before and after differentiation with nerve growth factor (NGF). Protein expression profiles of 5 mutant sublines carrying different mutations affecting HGprt enzyme activity were compared to the HGprt-competent parent line using the method of stable isotopic labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) followed by denaturing gel electrophoresis with liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) of tryptic digests, and subsequent identification of affected biochemical pathways using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) functional annotation chart analysis. The results demonstrate that HGprt deficiency causes broad changes in protein expression that depend on whether the cells are differentiated or not. Several of the pathways identified reflect predictable consequences of defective purine recycling. Other pathways were not anticipated, disclosing previously unknown connections with purine metabolism and novel insights into the pathogenesis of LND.

Protein translocation across the rough endoplasmic reticulum

The rough endoplasmic reticulum is a major site of protein biosynthesis in all eukaryotic cells, serving as the entry point for the secretory pathway and as the initial integration site for the majority of cellular integral membrane proteins. The core components of the protein translocation machinery have been identified, and high-resolution structures of the targeting components and the transport channel have been obtained. Research in this area is now focused on obtaining a better understanding of the molecular mechanism of protein translocation and membrane protein integration.

Inhibitors of MAPK pathway ERK1/2 or p38 prevent the IL-1{beta}-induced up-regulation of SRP72 autoantigen in Jurkat cells

Phosphorylation is the most important post-translational event at a cellular level that is regulated by protein kinases. MAPK is a key player in the important cellular signaling pathway. It has been hypothesized that phosphorylation might have a role in the induction of break tolerance against some autoantigens such as SRP72. The aim of this study was to explore the pathways of phosphorylation and overexpression of the SRP72 polypeptide, using an in vitro model of Jurkat cells stimulated by recombinant human (rh)IL-1β in the presence of MAPK inhibitors. We used Jurkat cells as a substrate stimulated with rhIL-1β in the presence of MAPK inhibitors at different concentrations in a time course in vitro experiment by immunoprecipitation, immunoprecipitation-Western blotting, and real time PCR. Our results showed that rhIL-1β causes up-regulation of protein expression and phosphorylation of SRP72 in Jurkat cells. Inhibitors of the MAPK pathway ERK1/2 or p38α/β down-regulate the expression of SRP72 autoantigen in Jurkat cells stimulated by rhIL-1β. Our results highlight the importance of studying the pathways of activation and overexpression of autoantigens. It will be necessary to perform careful research on various kinases pathways, including MAPK in dermatomyositis and other rheumatic diseases, to help to explain the routes of activation and inhibition of autoantigens. The understanding of this process may help to develop new therapies to prevent and control the loss of tolerance toward own normal proteins.

The membrane-binding motif of the chloroplast signal recognition particle receptor (cpFtsY) regulates GTPase activity

The chloroplast signal recognition particle (cpSRP) and its receptor (cpFtsY) function in thylakoid biogenesis to target integral membrane proteins to thylakoids. Unlike cytosolic SRP receptors in eukaryotes, cpFtsY partitions between thylakoid membranes and the soluble stroma. Based on sequence alignments, a membrane-binding motif identified in Escherichia coli FtsY appears to be conserved in cpFtsY, yet whether the proposed motif is responsible for the membrane-binding function of cpFtsY has yet to be shown experimentally. Our studies show that a small N-terminal region in cpFtsY stabilizes a membrane interaction critical to cpFtsY function in cpSRP-dependent protein targeting. This membrane-binding motif is both necessary and sufficient to direct cpFtsY and fused passenger proteins to thylakoids. Our results demonstrate that the cpFtsY membrane-binding motif may be functionally replaced by the corresponding region from E. coli, confirming that the membrane-binding motif is conserved among organellar and prokaryotic homologs. Furthermore, the capacity of cpFtsY for lipid binding correlates with liposome-induced GTP hydrolysis stimulation. Mutations that debilitate the membrane-binding motif in cpFtsY result in higher rates of GTP hydrolysis, suggesting that negative regulation is provided by the intact membrane-binding region in the absence of a bilayer. Furthermore, NMR and CD structural studies of the N-terminal region and the analogous region in the E. coli SRP receptor revealed a conformational change in secondary structure that takes place upon lipid binding. These studies suggest that the cpFtsY membrane-binding motif plays a critical role in the intramolecular communication that regulates cpSRP receptor functions at the membrane.

The GTPase cycle of the chloroplast import receptors Toc33/Toc34: implications from monomeric and dimeric structures

Transport of precursor proteins across chloroplast membranes involves the GTPases Toc33/34 and Toc159 at the outer chloroplast envelope. The small GTPase Toc33/34 can homodimerize, but the regulation of this interaction has remained elusive. We show that dimerization is independent of nucleotide loading state, based on crystal structures of dimeric Pisum sativum Toc34 and monomeric Arabidopsis thaliana Toc33. An arginine residue is--in the dimer--positioned to resemble a GAP arginine finger. However, GTPase activation by dimerization is sparse and active site features do not explain catalysis, suggesting that the homodimer requires an additional factor as coGAP. Access to the catalytic center and an unusual switch I movement in the dimeric structure support this finding. Potential binding sites for interactions within the Toc translocon or with precursor proteins can be derived from the structures.

Conformational changes in the GTPase modules of the signal reception particle and its receptor drive initiation of protein translocation

During cotranslational protein targeting, two guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) in the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor (SR) form a unique complex in which hydrolyses of both guanosine triphosphates (GTP) are activated in a shared active site. It was thought that GTP hydrolysis drives the recycling of SRP and SR, but is not crucial for protein targeting. Here, we examined the translocation efficiency of mutant GTPases that block the interaction between SRP and SR at specific stages. Surprisingly, mutants that allow SRP–SR complex assembly but block GTPase activation severely compromise protein translocation. These mutations map to the highly conserved insertion box domain loops that rearrange upon complex formation to form multiple catalytic interactions with the two GTPs. Thus, although GTP hydrolysis is not required, the molecular rearrangements that lead to GTPase activation are essential for protein targeting. Most importantly, our results show that an elaborate rearrangement within the SRP–SR GTPase complex is required to drive the unloading and initiate translocation of cargo proteins.

The archaeal signal recognition particle: steps toward membrane binding

Signal recognition particles and their receptors target ribosome nascent chain complexes of preproteins toward the protein translocation apparatus of the cell. The discovery of essential SRP components in the third urkingdom of the phylogenetic tree, the archaea (Woese, C. R., and Fox, G. E. (1977). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 5088-5090) raises questions concerning the structure and composition of the archaeal signal recognition particle as well as the functions that route nascent prepoly peptide chains to the membrane. Investigations of the archaeal SRP pathway could therefore identify novel aspects of this process not previously reported or unique to archaea when compared with the respective eukaryal and bacterial systems.

Membrane binding of SRP pathway components in the halophilic archaea Haloferax volcanii

Across evolution, the signal recognition particle pathway targets extra-cytoplasmic proteins to membranous translocation sites. Whereas the pathway has been extensively studied in Eukarya and Bacteria, little is known of this system in Archaea. In the following, membrane association of FtsY, the prokaryal signal recognition particle receptor, and SRP54, a central component of the signal recognition particle, was addressed in the halophilic archaea Haloferax volcanii. Purified H. volcanii FtsY, the FtsY C-terminal GTP-binding domain (NG domain) or SRP54, were combined separately or in different combinations with H. volcanii inverted membrane vesicles and examined by gradient floatation to differentiate between soluble and membrane-bound protein. Such studies revealed that both FtsY and the FtsY NG domain bound to H. volcanii vesicles in a manner unaffected by proteolytic pretreatment of the membranes, implying that in Archaea, FtsY association is mediated through the membrane lipids. Indeed, membrane association of FtsY was also detected in intact H. volcanii cells. The contribution of the NG domain to FtsY binding in halophilic archaea may be considerable, given the low number of basic charges found at the start of the N-terminal acidic domain of haloarchaeal FtsY proteins (the region of the protein thought to mediate FtsY-membrane association in Bacteria). Moreover, FtsY, but not the NG domain, was shown to mediate membrane association of H. volcanii SRP54, a protein that did not otherwise interact with the membrane.

Membrane Binding of Ribosomes Occurs at SecYE-based Sites in the Archaea Haloferax volcanii

Whereas ribosomes bind to membranes at eukaryal Sec61alphabetagamma and bacterial SecYEG sites, ribosomal membrane binding has yet to be studied in Archaea. Accordingly, functional ribosomes and inverted membrane vesicles were prepared from the halophilic archaea Haloferax volcanii. The ability of the ribosomes to bind to the membranes was determined using a flotation approach. Proteolytic pretreatment of the vesicles, as well as quantitative analyses, revealed the existence of a proteinaceous ribosome receptor, with the affinity of binding being comparable to that found in Eukarya and Bacteria. Inverted membrane vesicles prepared from cells expressing chimeras of SecE or SecY fused to a cytoplasmically oriented cellulose-binding domain displayed reduced ribosome binding due to steric hindrance. Pretreatment with cellulose drastically reduced ribosome binding to chimera-containing but not wild-type vesicles. Thus, as in Eukarya and Bacteria, ribosome binding in Archaea occurs at Sec-based sites. However, unlike the situation in the other domains of Life, ribosome binding in haloarchaea requires molar concentrations of salt. Structural information on ribosome-Sec complexes may provide insight into this high salt-dependent binding.

Translocation of proteins across archaeal cytoplasmic membranes

All cells need to transport proteins across hydrophobic membranes. Several mechanisms have evolved to facilitate this transport, including: (i) the universally-conserved Sec system, which transports proteins in an unfolded conformation and is thought to be the major translocation pathway in most organisms and (ii) the Tat system, which transports proteins that have already obtained some degree of tertiary structure. Here, we present the current understanding of these processes in the domain Archaea, and how they compare to the corresponding pathways in bacteria and eukaryotes.

Dual recognition of the ribosome and the signal recognition particle by the SRP receptor during protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum

We have analyzed the interactions between the signal recognition particle (SRP), the SRP receptor (SR), and the ribosome using GTPase assays, biosensor experiments, and ribosome binding assays. Possible mechanisms that could contribute to an enhanced affinity between the SR and the SRP-ribosome nascent chain complex to promote protein translocation under physiological ionic strength conditions have been explored. Ribosomes or 60S large ribosomal subunits activate the GTPase cycle of SRP54 and SRalpha by providing a platform for assembly of the SRP-SR complex. Biosensor experiments revealed high-affinity, saturable binding of ribosomes or large ribosomal subunits to the SR. Remarkably, the SR has a 100-fold higher affinity for the ribosome than for SRP. Proteoliposomes that contain the SR bind nontranslating ribosomes with an affinity comparable to that shown by the Sec61 complex. An NH2-terminal 319-residue segment of SRalpha is necessary and sufficient for binding of SR to the ribosome. We propose that the ribosome-SR interaction accelerates targeting of the ribosome nascent chain complex to the RER, while the SRP-SR interaction is crucial for maintaining the fidelity of the targeting reaction.

Protein-protein, protein-RNA and protein-lipid interactions of signal-recognition particle components in the hyperthermoacidophilic archaeon Acidianus ambivalens

The signal-recognition particle (SRP) of one of the most acidophilic and hyperthermophilic archaeal cells, Acidianus ambivalens, and its putative receptor component, FtsY (prokaryotic SRP receptor), were investigated in detail. A. ambivalens Ffh (fifty-four-homologous protein) was shown to be a soluble protein with strong affinity to membranes. In its membrane-residing form, Ffh was extracted from plasma membranes with chaotropic agents like urea, but not with agents diminishing electrostatic interactions. Using unilamellar tetraether phospholipid vesicles, both Ffh and FtsY associate independently from each other in the absence of other factors, suggesting an equilibrium of soluble and membrane-bound protein forms under in vivo conditions. The Ffh protein precipitated from cytosolic cell supernatants with anti-Ffh antibodies, together with an 7 S-alike SRP-RNA, suggesting a stable core ribonucleoprotein composed of both components under native conditions. The SRP RNA of A. ambivalens depicted a size of about 309 nucleotides like the SRP RNA of the related organism Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. A stable heterodimeric complex composed of Ffh and FtsY was absent in cytosolic supernatants, indicating a transiently formed complex during archaeal SRP targeting. The FtsY protein precipitated in cytosolic supernatants with anti-FtsY antisera as a homomeric protein lacking accessory protein components. However, under in vitro conditions, recombinantly generated Ffh and FtsY associate in a nucleotide-independent manner, supporting a structural receptor model with two interacting apoproteins.

Molecular mechanism of signal sequence orientation in the endoplasmic reticulum

We have analyzed in vivo how model signal sequences are inserted and oriented in the membrane during cotranslational integration into the endoplasmic reticulum. The results are incompatible with the current models of retention of positive flanking charges or loop insertion of the polypeptide into the translocon. Instead they indicate that these N-terminal signals initially insert head-on with a cytoplasmic C-terminus before they invert their orientation to translocate the C-terminus. The rate of inversion increases with more positive N-terminal charge and is reduced with increasing hydrophobicity of the signal. Inversion may proceed for up to approximately 50 s, when it is terminated by a signal-independent process. These findings provide a mechanism for the topogenic effects of flanking charges as well as of signal hydrophobicity.

Co-translational targeting and translocation of the amino terminus of opsin across the endoplasmic membrane requires GTP but not ATP

The tight coupling between ongoing translation and translocation across the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum has made it difficult to determine the requirements that are specific for translocation. We have developed an in vitro assay that faithfully mimics the co-translational targeting and translocation of the amino terminus of opsin without ongoing translation. Using this system we demonstrate that this post-translational targeting and translocation requires nucleotide triphosphates but not cytosolic proteins. The addition of GTP alone was sufficient to fully restore targeting. The addition of ATP was not specifically required, and non-hydrolyzable analogs of ATP that blocked 90% of the ATPase activity also had no inhibitory effect on translocation.

Heat shock response of warm-incubated barley aleurone layers

Heat shock suppresses secretory protein synthesis in GA(3)-stimulated barley (Hordeum vulgare cv. Himalaya) aleurone layers by selectively destabilizing their mRNAs and dissociating the stacked rough endoplasmic reticulum (ER) lamellae upon which they are translated. Heat shock also increases phosphatidylcholine (PC) synthesis, and these PC molecules have increased levels of fatty acid saturation. This appears to be adaptive, for aleurone layers maintained at heat shock temperatures for 18 h resynthesize secretory protein mRNAs, rebuild stacked ER lamellae, and resume secretory protein synthesis. In the present study aleurone layers were incubated at warmer than normal pre-heat shock temperatures to determine whether this would favor the formation of heat-resistant ER lamellae that could continue secretory protein synthesis during heat shock. Western blot and SDS-PAGE analyses showed that such treatment did not induce heat shock protein (HSP) synthesis, but it preserved significant secretory protein synthesis during heat shock. Northern hybridizations revealed that levels of mRNAs encoding secretory proteins were several-fold elevated as compared to 25°C preincubated controls, and transmission electron microscopic observations revealed stacked ER lamellae. Thin layer and gas chromatography showed that PC molecules in warm-incubated barley aleurone layers had more fatty acid saturation than did controls. These observations indicate that previous incubation temperature influences both the induction of HSP synthesis and the suppression of normal protein synthesis in the heat shock response. However, we found that it does not affect the temperature at which heat shock becomes lethal.

Essential role of the G-domain in targeting of the protein import receptor atToc159 to the chloroplast outer membrane

Two homologous GTP-binding proteins, atToc33 and atToc159, control access of cytosolic precursor proteins to the chloroplast. atToc33 is a constitutive outer chloroplast membrane protein, whereas the precursor receptor atToc159 also exists in a soluble, cytosolic form. This suggests that atToc159 may be able to switch between a soluble and an integral membrane form. By transient expression of GFP fusion proteins, mutant analysis, and biochemical experimentation, we demonstrate that the GTP-binding domain regulates the targeting of cytosolic atToc159 to the chloroplast and mediates the switch between cytosolic and integral membrane forms. Mutant atToc159, unable to bind GTP, does not reinstate a green phenotype in an albino mutant (ppi2) lacking endogenous atToc159, remaining trapped in the cytosol. Thus, the function of atToc159 in chloroplast biogenesis is dependent on an intrinsic GTP-regulated switch that controls localization of the receptor to the chloroplast envelope.

The targeting of the atToc159 preprotein receptor to the chloroplast outer membrane is mediated by its GTPase domain and is regulated by GTP

The multimeric translocon at the outer envelope membrane of chloroplasts (Toc) initiates the recognition and import of nuclear-encoded preproteins into chloroplasts. Two Toc GTPases, Toc159 and Toc33/34, mediate preprotein recognition and regulate preprotein translocation. Although these two proteins account for the requirement of GTP hydrolysis for import, the functional significance of GTP binding and hydrolysis by either GTPase has not been defined. A recent study indicates that Toc159 is equally distributed between a soluble cytoplasmic form and a membrane-inserted form, raising the possibility that it might cycle between the cytoplasm and chloroplast as a soluble preprotein receptor. In the present study, we examined the mechanism of targeting and insertion of the Arabidopsis thaliana orthologue of Toc159, atToc159, to chloroplasts. Targeting of atToc159 to the outer envelope membrane is strictly dependent only on guanine nucleotides. Although GTP is not required for initial binding, the productive insertion and assembly of atToc159 into the Toc complex requires its intrinsic GTPase activity. Targeting is mediated by direct binding between the GTPase domain of atToc159 and the homologous GTPase domain of atToc33, the Arabidopsis Toc33/34 orthologue. Our findings demonstrate a role for the coordinate action of the Toc GTPases in assembly of the functional Toc complex at the chloroplast outer envelope membrane.

Assembly strategies and GTPase regulation of the eukaryotic and Escherichia coli translocons

The translocation of most proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum or bacterial inner membrane occurs through an aqueous pore that spans the membrane. Substrates that are translocated co-translationally across the membrane are directed to the translocation pore via an interaction between the cytosolic signal recognition particle and its membrane-bound receptor. Together the translocation pore and the receptor are referred to as a translocon. By studying the biogenesis of the translocon a number of alternate targeting and membrane-integration pathways have been discovered that operate independently of the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway. The novel assembly strategies of the translocon and the ways in which these components interact to ensure the fidelity and unidirectionality of the targeting and translocation process are reviewed here.Key words: protein translocation, translocon, SRP receptor, GTPases.

The conformation of bound GMPPNP suggests a mechanism for gating the active site of the SRP GTPase

BACKGROUND

The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a phylogenetically conserved ribonucleoprotein that mediates cotranslational targeting of secreted and membrane proteins to the membrane. Targeting is regulated by GTP binding and hydrolysis events that require direct interaction between structurally homologous "NG" GTPase domains of the SRP signal recognition subunit and its membrane-associated receptor, SR alpha. Structures of both the apo and GDP bound NG domains of the prokaryotic SRP54 homolog, Ffh, and the prokaryotic receptor homolog, FtsY, have been determined. The structural basis for the GTP-dependent interaction between the two proteins, however, remains unknown.

RESULTS

We report here two structures of the NG GTPase of Ffh from Thermus aquaticus bound to the nonhydrolyzable GTP analog GMPPNP. Both structures reveal an unexpected binding mode in which the beta-phosphate is kinked away from the binding site and magnesium is not bound. Binding of the GTP analog in the canonical conformation found in other GTPase structures is precluded by constriction of the phosphate binding P loop. The structural difference between the Ffh complex and other GTPases suggests a specific conformational change that must accompany movement of the nucleotide from an "inactive" to an "active" binding mode.

CONCLUSIONS

Conserved side chains of the GTPase sequence motifs unique to the SRP subfamily may function to gate formation of the active GTP bound conformation. Exposed hydrophobic residues provide an interaction surface that may allow regulation of the GTP binding conformation, and thus activation of the GTPase, during the association of SRP with its receptor.

Protein translocation across membranes

Cellular membranes act as semipermeable barriers to ions and macromolecules. Specialized mechanisms of transport of proteins across membranes have been developed during evolution. There are common mechanistic themes among protein translocation systems in bacteria and in eukaryotic cells. Here we review current understanding of mechanisms of protein transport across the bacterial plasma membrane as well as across several organelle membranes of yeast and mammalian cells. We consider a variety of organelles including the endoplasmic reticulum, outer and inner membranes of mitochondria, outer, inner, and thylakoid membranes of chloroplasts, peroxisomes, and lysosomes. Several common principles are evident: (a) multiple pathways of protein translocation across membranes exist, (b) molecular chaperones are required in the cytosol, inside the organelle, and often within the organelle membrane, (c) ATP and/or GTP hydrolysis is required, (d) a proton-motive force across the membrane is often required, and (e) protein translocation occurs through gated, aqueous channels. There are exceptions to each of these common principles indicating that our knowledge of how proteins translocate across membranes is not yet complete.

Current awareness on yeast

In order to keep subscribers up-to-date with the latest developments in their field, this current awareness service is provided by John Wiley & Sons and contains newly-published material on yeasts. Each bibliography is divided into 10 sections. 1 Books, Reviews & Symposia; 2 General; 3 Biochemistry; 4 Biotechnology; 5 Cell Biology; 6 Gene Expression; 7 Genetics; 8 Physiology; 9 Medical Mycology; 10 Recombinant DNA Technology. Within each section, articles are listed in alphabetical order with respect to author. If, in the preceding period, no publications are located relevant to any one of these headings, that section will be omitted. (3 weeks journals - search completed 21st June 2000)

Membrane topology and insertion of membrane proteins: search for topogenic signals

Integral membrane proteins are found in all cellular membranes and carry out many of the functions that are essential to life. The membrane-embedded domains of integral membrane proteins are structurally quite simple, allowing the use of various prediction methods and biochemical methods to obtain structural information about membrane proteins. A critical step in the biosynthetic pathway leading to the folded protein in the membrane is its insertion into the lipid bilayer. Understanding of the fundamentals of the insertion and folding processes will significantly improve the methods used to predict the three-dimensional membrane protein structure from the amino acid sequence. In the first part of this review, biochemical approaches to elucidate membrane protein topology are reviewed and evaluated, and in the second part, the use of similar techniques to study membrane protein insertion is discussed. The latter studies search for signals in the polypeptide chain that direct the insertion process. Knowledge of the topogenic signals in the nascent chain of a membrane protein is essential for the evaluation of membrane topology studies.

Role of Sec61alpha in the regulated transfer of the ribosome-nascent chain complex from the signal recognition particle to the translocation channel

Targeting of ribosome-nascent chain complexes to the translocon in the endoplasmic reticulum is mediated by the concerted action of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the SRP receptor (SR). Ribosome-stripped microsomes were digested with proteases to sever cytoplasmic domains of SRalpha, SRbeta, TRAM, and the Sec61 complex. We characterized protein translocation intermediates that accumulate when Sec61alpha or SRbeta is inactivated by proteolysis. In the absence of a functional Sec61 complex, dissociation of SRP54 from the signal sequence is blocked. Experiments using SR proteoliposomes confirmed the assembly of a membrane-bound posttargeting intermediate. These results strongly suggest that the Sec61 complex regulates the GTP hydrolysis cycle of the SRP-SR complex at the stage of signal sequence dissociation from SRP54.

Bacillus subtilis histone-like protein, HBsu, is an integral component of a SRP-like particle that can bind the Alu domain of small cytoplasmic RNA

Small cytoplasmic RNA (scRNA) is metabolically stable and abundant in Bacillus subtilis cells. Consisting of 271 nucleotides, it is structurally homologous to mammalian signal recognition particle RNA. In contrast to 4.5 S RNA of Escherichia coli, B. subtilis scRNA contains an Alu domain in addition to the evolutionarily conserved S domain. In this study, we show that a 10-kDa protein in B. subtilis cell extracts has scRNA binding activity at the Alu domain. The in vitro binding selectivity of the 10-kDa protein shows that it recognizes the higher structure of the Alu domain of scRNA caused by five consecutive complementary sequences in the two loops. Purification and subsequent analyses demonstrated that the 10-kDa protein is HBsu, which was originally identified as a member of the histone-like protein family. By constructing a HBsu-deficient B. subtilis mutant, we showed that HBsu is essential for normal growth. Immunoprecipitating cell lysates using anti-HBsu antibody yielded scRNA. Moreover, the co-precipitation of HBsu with (His)6-tagged Ffh depended on the presence of scRNA, suggesting that HBsu, Ffh, and scRNA make a ternary complex and that scRNA serves as a functional unit for binding. These results demonstrated that HBsu is the third component of a signal recognition particle-like particle in B. subtilis that can bind the Alu domain of scRNA.

Involvement of a chloroplast homologue of the signal recognition particle receptor protein, FtsY, in protein targeting to thylakoids

We isolated an Arabidopsis thaliana cDNA whose translated product shows sequence similarity to the FtsY, a bacterial homologue of SRP receptor protein. The Arabidopsis FtsY homologue contains a typical chloroplast transit peptide. The in vitro-synthesized 37 kDa FtsY homologue was imported into chloroplasts, and the processed 32 kDa polypeptide bound peripherally on the outer surface of thylakoids. Antibodies raised against the FtsY homologue also reacted with a thylakoid-bound 32 kDa protein. The antibodies inhibited the cpSRP-dependent insertion of the light-harvesting chlorophyll alb-binding protein into thylakoid membranes suggesting that the chloroplast FtsY homologue is involved in the cpSRP-dependent protein targeting to the thylakoid membranes.

Phosphorylation of components of the ER translocation site

In many eukaryotic cells, protein secretion is regulated by extracellular signalling molecules giving rise to increased intracellular Ca2+ and activation of kinases and phosphatases. To test whether components involved in the first step of secretion, the translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane, are regulated by Ca2+-dependent phosphorylation and dephosphorylation, we have investigated the effect of Ca2+ on kinases associated with the rough ER. Using purified rough microsomes from dog pancreas we found that Ca2+-dependent isoforms of protein kinase C (PKC) are associated with the rough ER and phosphorylate essential components of the protein translocation machinery. Phosphorylation of microsomal proteins by PKCs increased protein translocation efficiency in vitro. We also found that proteins of the translocation machinery became phosphorylated in intact cells. This suggests a further level of regulation of protein translocation across the ER membrane.

Yarrowia lipolytica TSR1 gene product. A novel endoplasmic reticulum membrane component involved in the signal recognition particle-dependent translocation pathway

The tsr1-1 mutation has been initially identified as an extragenic suppressor of the scr2.II-13 mutation that alters the 7SL RNA component of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and results in severe defects in protein translocation and SRP stability. We showed previously that the TSR1 gene was essential and that the tsr1-1 mutation allowed complete recovery of scr2.II-13-associated secretory defects. We show here that the tsr1-1 mutation also restores SRP stability in an scr2.II-13 context. The TSR1 gene product (Tsr1p) is stably associated with rapidly sedimenting material and cofractionates with the lumenal protein Kar2p of the endoplasmic reticulum; it behaves in protease protection assays as a transmembrane component. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments revealed a physical interaction with Kar2p and with ribosomal components associated to the 5.8S rRNA as well as with SRP components like Sec65p and 7SL RNA. We propose that Tsr1p is an important component of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, interacting both with the SRP-ribosome complex in the cytosol and with Kar2p in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum.

Empty site forms of the SRP54 and SR alpha GTPases mediate targeting of ribosome-nascent chain complexes to the endoplasmic reticulum

The SRP54 and SR alpha subunits of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the SRP receptor (SR) undergo a tightly coupled GTPase cycle that mediates the signal sequence-dependent attachment of ribosomes to the Sec61 complex. Here, we show that SRP54 and SR alpha are in the empty site conformation prior to contact between the SRP-ribosome complex and the membrane-bound SR. Cooperative binding of GTP to SRP54 and SR alpha stabilizes the SRP-SR complex and initiates signal sequence transfer from SRP54 to Sec61 alpha. The GTP-bound conformations of SR alpha and SRP54 perform distinct roles, with SR alpha performing a predominant role in complex stabilization. Hydrolysis by both SRP54 and SR alpha is a prerequisite for dissociation of the SRP-SR complex.

The signal recognition particle receptor alpha subunit of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Acidianus ambivalens exhibits an intrinsic GTP-hydrolyzing activity

Two adjacent genes of the acidophilic and hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon Acidianus ambivalens were cloned and sequenced. The 1.6 kb genomic nucleotide sequence under investigation consists of the 1.12 kb SRa gene encoding the putative signal recognition particle receptor alpha subunit (SR alpha, 42.2 kDa) and the 186 basepair secE gene coding for the putative secretory component secE subunit (6800 Da). The SR alpha protein is structured by three distinct regions: the N-terminal hydrophilic H-region, the following X-region and the C-terminal GTP-binding domain. A polyclonal anti-E. coli lacZ/A. ambivalens SR alpha antiserum detects a 51 kDa cell protein (p51) on immunoblots. Proteolysis of the recombinant SR alpha protein by Proteinase K produces a 31.6 kDa protease-resistant protein fragment comprising X-region and G-domain. The protein binds tightly to the GTP-agarose affinity matrix in a temperature-dependent manner. It hydrolyzes GTP readily at higher temperatures only in the presence of Mg2+. Point mutations (T326N) and (D329A) in the G-4 element of A. ambivalens SR alpha G-domain diminish the GTPase activity significantly. In contrast, the deletion mutant protein SR alpha (delta1-92) lacking the hydrophilic H-region displays a higher GTP-hydrolyzing activity when compared to the unmodified recombinant protein. Addition of GDP greatly inhibits GTP hydrolysis in mutant and unmodified A. ambivalens SR alpha.

Transport of proteins in eukaryotic cells: more questions ahead

Some newly synthesized proteins contain signals that direct their transport to their final location within or outside of the cell. Targeting signals are recognized by specific protein receptors located either in the cytoplasm or in the membrane of the target organelle. Specific membrane protein complexes are involved in insertion and translocation of polypeptides across the membranes. Often, additional targeting signals are required for a polypeptide to be further transported to its site of function. In this review, we will describe the trafficking of proteins to various cellular organelles (nucleus, chloroplasts, mitochondria, peroxisomes) with emphasis on transport to and through the secretory pathway.

Approaching the mechanism of protein transport across the ER membrane

Since the identification of essential protein-translocation components in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, research efforts have concentrated on the elucidation of the molecular mechanism of protein transport across this membrane. Recent results have provided new information as to how proteins are targeted to, and inserted into, the translocation site during translation. Post-translational translocation has also been examined and is distinct from cotranslational translocation with respect to the mechanism and membrane protein components involved.

Influence of specific signal peptide mutations on the expression and secretion of the alpha-amylase inhibitor tendamistat in Streptomyces lividans

The Streptomyces alpha-amylase inhibitor tendamistat is secreted by a signal peptide with an amino-terminal charge of +3. To elucidate the influence of the charged residues on protein secretion in Streptomyces, the amino-terminal charge was varied from +6 to neutral net charge. The effects of charge variation were analyzed in combination with three Streptomyces promoters and two transcriptional terminators. Introduction of additional positive charges significantly decreased the amount of secreted tendamistat. On the contrary, a charge reduction to +2 resulted in the doubling of inhibitor production. After exclusion of transcriptional effects, the observed alterations of inhibitor secretion by the mutants with a charge of +6 to +2 were attributed to a modulation of precursor synthesis. Furthermore, a tight coupling of synthesis and export was stated. Charge reduction to +1 or neutral charge generally reduced the yield of secreted tendamistat, yet remarkable differences were found for mutants with identical net charge. Elimination of the positive charge at a defined position resulted in the release of tendamistat precursor protein, which suggested a specific uncoupling of synthesis and translocation.

Substitution of fifty four homologue (Ffh) in Escherichia coli with the mammalian 54-kDa protein of signal-recognition particle

The fifty four homologue (Ffh) of Escherichia coli promotes the translocation of a subset of periplasmic, membrane and secreted proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane. The ffh gene product is essential for cell viability and efficient protein export. Here we show that the mammalian homologue signal-recognition particle (SRP) 54 kDa is not able to suppress the translocation defect in an Ffh conditional mutant Wam 113 [Phillips, G.J. & Silhavy, T.J. (1992) Nature 359, 744-746]. The expression of SRP 54kDa, which is increased when Ffh is suppressed in the Wam 113 strain, causes a pleiotropic defect characterised by cell elongation, and increased accumulation of precursor proteins. The accumulation of precursors of outer membrane protein A (Omp A) and maltose-binding protein (MBP), See-B dependent pre-proteins, was less than the Ffh-dependent proteins ribose-binding protein (RBP) and beta-lactamase. Sec B expression was suppressed by Ffh expression. The recombinant SRP 54 kDa, which forms a ribonucleoprotein complex in E coli, was shown to bind to precursor proteins, but is unable to interact with the filamentous temperature-sensitive Y (Fts Y) membrane receptor of the translocation machinery.

Regulation by the ribosome of the GTPase of the signal-recognition particle during protein targeting

The signal-recognition particle (SRP) is important for the targeting of many secretory and membrane proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Targeting is regulated by three GTPases, the 54K subunit of SRP (SRP54), and the alpha- and beta-subunits of the SRP receptor. When a signal sequence emerges from the ribosome, SRP interacts with it and targets the resulting complex to the ER membrane by binding to the SRP receptor. Subsequently, SRP releases the signal sequence into the translocation channel. Here we use a complex of a ribosome with a nascent peptide chain, the SRP and its receptor, to investigate GTP binding to SRP54, and GTP hydrolysis. Our findings indicate that a ribosomal component promotes GTP binding to the SRP54 subunit of SRP. GTP-bound SRP54 is essential for high-affinity interaction between SRP and its receptor in the ER membrane. This interaction induces the release of the signal sequence from SRP, the insertion of the nascent polypeptide chain into the translocation channel, and GTP hydrolysis. The contribution of the ribosome had previously escaped detection because only synthetic signal peptides were used in the analysis.

Signal recognition particle (SRP), a ubiquitous initiator of protein translocation

In higher eukaryotes, most secretory and membrane proteins are synthesised by ribosomes which are attached to the membrane of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER). This allows the proteins to be translocated across that membrane already during their synthesis. The ribosomes are directed to the RER membrane by a cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein particle, the signal recognition particle (SRP). SRP fulfills its task by virtue of three distinguishable activities: the binding of a signal sequence which, being part of the nascent polypeptide to be translocated, is exposed on the surface of a translating ribosome; the retardation of any further elongation; and the SRP-receptor-mediated binding of the complex of ribosome, nascent polypeptide and SRP to the RER membrane which results in the detachment of SRP from the signal sequence and the ribosome and the insertion of the nascent polypeptide into the membrane. Evidence is accumulating that SRP is not restricted to eukaryotes: SRP-related particles and SRP-receptor-related molecules are found ubiquitously and may function in protein translocation in every living organism. This review focuses on the mammalian SRP. A brief discussion of its overall structure is followed by a detailed description of the structures of its RNA and protein constituents and the requirements for their assembly into the particle. Homologues of SRP components from organisms other than mammals are mentioned to emphasize the components' conserved or less conserved features. Subsequently, the functions of each of the SRP constituents are discussed. This sets the stage for a presentation of a model for the mechanism by which SRP cyclically assembles and disassembles with translating ribosomes and the RER membrane. It may be expected that similar mechanisms are used by SRP homologues in organisms other than mammals. However, the mammalian SRP-mediated translocation mechanism may not be conserved in its entirety in organisms like Escherichia coli whose SRP lack components required for the function of the mammalian SRP. Possible translocation pathways involving the rudimentary SRP are discussed in view of the existence of alternative, chaperone-mediated translocation pathways with which they may intersect. The concluding two sections deal with open questions in two areas of SRP research. One formulates basic questions regarding the little-investigated biogenesis of SRP. The other gives an outlook over the insights into the mechanisms of each of the known activities of the SRP that are to be expected in the short and medium-term future.

The Srp54 GTPase is essential for protein export in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Signal recognition particle (SRP) is a cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein required for targeting a subset of presecretory proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. Here we report the results of a series of experiments to define the function of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe homolog of the 54-kDa subunit of mammalian SRP. One-step gene disruption reveals that the Srp54 protein, like SRP RNA, is essential for viability in S. pombe. Precursor to the secretory protein acid phosphatase accumulates in cells in which Srp54 synthesis has been repressed under the control of a regulated promoter, indicating that S. pombe SRP functions in protein targeting. In common with other Srp54 homologs, the S. pombe protein has a modular structure consisting of an amino-terminal G (GTPase) domain and a carboxyl-terminal M (methionine-rich) domain. We have analyzed the effects of 17 site-specific mutations designed to alter the function of each of the four GTPase consensus motifs individually. Several alleles, including some with relatively conservative amino acid substitutions, confer lethal or conditional phenotypes, indicating that GTP binding and hydrolysis are critical to the in vivo role of the protein. Two mutations (R to L at position 194 [R194L] and R194H) which were designed, by analogy to oncogenic mutations in rats, to dramatically decrease the catalytic rate and one (T248N) predicted to alter nucleotide binding specificity produce proteins that are unable to support growth at 18 degrees C. Consistent with its design, the R194L mutant hydrolyzes GTP at a reduced rate relative to wild-type Srp54 in enzymatic assays on immunoprecipitated proteins. In strains that also contain wild-type srp54, this mutant protein, as well as others designed to be locked in a GTP-bound conformation, exhibits temperature-dependent dominant inhibitory effects on growth, while a mutant predicted to be GDP locked does not interfere with the function of the wild-type protein. These results form the basis of a simple model for the role of GTP hydrolysis by Srp54 during the SRP cycle.

The Srp54 GTPase is essential for protein export in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Signal recognition particle (SRP) is a cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein required for targeting a subset of presecretory proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. Here we report the results of a series of experiments to define the function of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe homolog of the 54-kDa subunit of mammalian SRP. One-step gene disruption reveals that the Srp54 protein, like SRP RNA, is essential for viability in S. pombe. Precursor to the secretory protein acid phosphatase accumulates in cells in which Srp54 synthesis has been repressed under the control of a regulated promoter, indicating that S. pombe SRP functions in protein targeting. In common with other Srp54 homologs, the S. pombe protein has a modular structure consisting of an amino-terminal G (GTPase) domain and a carboxyl-terminal M (methionine-rich) domain. We have analyzed the effects of 17 site-specific mutations designed to alter the function of each of the four GTPase consensus motifs individually. Several alleles, including some with relatively conservative amino acid substitutions, confer lethal or conditional phenotypes, indicating that GTP binding and hydrolysis are critical to the in vivo role of the protein. Two mutations (R to L at position 194 [R194L] and R194H) which were designed, by analogy to oncogenic mutations in rats, to dramatically decrease the catalytic rate and one (T248N) predicted to alter nucleotide binding specificity produce proteins that are unable to support growth at 18 degrees C. Consistent with its design, the R194L mutant hydrolyzes GTP at a reduced rate relative to wild-type Srp54 in enzymatic assays on immunoprecipitated proteins. In strains that also contain wild-type srp54, this mutant protein, as well as others designed to be locked in a GTP-bound conformation, exhibits temperature-dependent dominant inhibitory effects on growth, while a mutant predicted to be GDP locked does not interfere with the function of the wild-type protein. These results form the basis of a simple model for the role of GTP hydrolysis by Srp54 during the SRP cycle.

Signal sequence recognition and targeting of ribosomes to the endoplasmic reticulum by the signal recognition particle do not require GTP

The identification of GTP-binding sites in the 54-kDa subunit of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and in both the alpha and beta subunits of the SRP receptor has complicated the task of defining the step in the protein translocation reaction that is controlled by the GTP-binding site in the SRP. Ribonucleotide binding assays show that the purified SRP can bind GDP or GTP. However, crosslinking experiments show that SRP54 can recognize the signal sequence of a nascent polypeptide in the absence of GTP. Targeting of SRP-ribosome-nascent polypeptide complexes, formed in the absence of GTP, to microsomal membranes likewise proceeds normally. To separate the GTPase cycles of SRP54 and the alpha subunit of the SRP receptor (SR alpha), we employed an SR alpha mutant that displays a markedly reduced affinity for GTP. We observed that the dissociation of SRP54 from the signal sequence and the insertion of the nascent polypeptide into the translocation site could only occur when GTP binding to SR alpha was permitted. These data suggest that the GTP binding and hydrolysis cycles of both SRP54 and SR alpha are initiated upon formation of the SRP-SRP receptor complex.

Protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum

In the past year, dramatic progress has been made in our understanding of protein biogenesis at the initial steps of the eukaryotic secretory pathway. New insights have refined our view of protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane and provided the best glimpse so far of the subsequent translocation step. The interactions of three GTP-binding proteins have been found to result in a novel cycle of GTP binding and hydrolysis to regulate protein targeting. Experiments with fluorescent probes have revealed that the nascent chain enters an aqueous environment within the membrane sealed off from the cytosol. In vitro reconstitution experiments have shown surprising simplicity in the number of polypeptides required to facilitate translocation across a synthetic membrane and to promote the integration of membrane proteins. Furthermore, new genetic and functional similarities between divergent organisms have been discovered, providing convincing evidence of the evolutionary conservation of strategies used in the targeting and translocation of polypeptides.

Molecular evolution of SRP cycle components: functional implications

Signal recognition particle (SRP) is a cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein that targets a subset of nascent presecretory proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. We have considered the SRP cycle from the perspective of molecular evolution, using recently determined sequences of genes or cDNAs encoding homologs of SRP (7SL) RNA, the Srp54 protein (Srp54p), and the alpha subunit of the SRP receptor (SR alpha) from a broad spectrum of organisms, together with the remaining five polypeptides of mammalian SRP. Our analysis provides insight into the significance of structural variation in SRP RNA and identifies novel conserved motifs in protein components of this pathway. The lack of congruence between an established phylogenetic tree and size variation in 7SL homologs implies the occurrence of several independent events that eliminated more than half the sequence content of this RNA during bacterial evolution. The apparently non-essential structures are domain I, a tRNA-like element that is constant in archaea, varies in size among eucaryotes, and is generally missing in bacteria, and domain III, a tightly base-paired hairpin that is present in all eucaryotic and archeal SRP RNAs but is invariably absent in bacteria. Based on both structural and functional considerations, we propose that the conserved core of SRP consists minimally of the 54 kDa signal sequence-binding protein complexed with the loosely base-paired domain IV helix of SRP RNA, and is also likely to contain a homolog of the Srp68 protein. Comparative sequence analysis of the methionine-rich M domains from a diverse array of Srp54p homologs reveals an extended region of amino acid identity that resembles a recently identified RNA recognition motif. Multiple sequence alignment of the G domains of Srp54p and SR alpha homologs indicates that these two polypeptides exhibit significant similarity even outside the four GTPase consensus motifs, including a block of nine contiguous amino acids in a location analogous to the binding site of the guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator (GDS) for E. coli EF-Tu. The conservation of this sequence, in combination with the results of earlier genetic and biochemical studies of the SRP cycle, leads us to hypothesize that a component of the Srp68/72p heterodimer serves as the GDS for both Srp54p and SR alpha. Using an iterative alignment procedure, we demonstrate similarity between Srp68p and sequence motifs conserved among GDS proteins for small Ras-related GTPases. The conservation of SRP cycle components in organisms from all three major branches of the phylogenetic tree suggests that this pathway for protein export is of ancient evolutionary origin.