Signal sequence recognition in cotranslational translocation by protein components of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane

Structural analysis of the dynamic ribosome-translocon complex

The protein translocon at the endoplasmic reticulum comprises the Sec61 translocation channel and numerous accessory factors that collectively facilitate the biogenesis of secretory and membrane proteins. Here, we leveraged recent advances in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and structure prediction to derive insights into several novel configurations of the ribosome-translocon complex. We show how a transmembrane domain (TMD) in a looped configuration passes through the Sec61 lateral gate during membrane insertion; how a nascent chain can bind and constrain the conformation of ribosomal protein uL22; and how the translocon-associated protein (TRAP) complex can adjust its position during different stages of protein biogenesis. Most unexpectedly, we find that a large proportion of translocon complexes contains RAMP4 intercalated into Sec61's lateral gate, widening Sec61's central pore and contributing to its hydrophilic interior. These structures lead to mechanistic hypotheses for translocon function and highlight a remarkably plastic machinery whose conformations and composition adjust dynamically to its diverse range of substrates.

The Molecular Biodiversity of Protein Targeting and Protein Transport Related to the Endoplasmic Reticulum

Looking at the variety of the thousands of different polypeptides that have been focused on in the research on the endoplasmic reticulum from the last five decades taught us one humble lesson: no one size fits all. Cells use an impressive array of components to enable the safe transport of protein cargo from the cytosolic ribosomes to the endoplasmic reticulum. Safety during the transit is warranted by the interplay of cytosolic chaperones, membrane receptors, and protein translocases that together form functional networks and serve as protein targeting and translocation routes. While two targeting routes to the endoplasmic reticulum, SRP (signal recognition particle) and GET (guided entry of tail-anchored proteins), prefer targeting determinants at the N- and C-terminus of the cargo polypeptide, respectively, the recently discovered SND (SRP-independent) route seems to preferentially cater for cargos with non-generic targeting signals that are less hydrophobic or more distant from the termini. With an emphasis on targeting routes and protein translocases, we will discuss those functional networks that drive efficient protein topogenesis and shed light on their redundant and dynamic nature in health and disease.

Transmembrane Domain Recognition during Membrane Protein Biogenesis and Quality Control

One-fourth of eukaryotic genes code for integral membrane proteins, nearly all of which are inserted and assembled at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The defining feature of membrane proteins is one or more transmembrane domains (TMDs). During membrane protein biogenesis, TMDs are selectively recognized, shielded, and chaperoned into the lipid bilayer, where they often assemble with other TMDs. If maturation fails, exposed TMDs serve as a cue for engagement of degradation pathways. Thus, TMD-recognition factors in the cytosol and ER are essential for membrane protein biogenesis and quality control. Here, we discuss the growing assortment of cytosolic and membrane-embedded TMD-recognition factors, the pathways within which they operate, and mechanistic principles of recognition.

Structure of the Sec61 channel opened by a signal sequence

Secreted and integral membrane proteins compose up to one-third of the biological proteome. These proteins contain hydrophobic signals that direct their translocation across or insertion into the lipid bilayer by the Sec61 protein-conducting channel. The molecular basis of how hydrophobic signals within a nascent polypeptide trigger channel opening is not understood. Here, we used cryo-electron microscopy to determine the structure of an active Sec61 channel that has been opened by a signal sequence. The signal supplants helix 2 of Sec61α, which triggers a rotation that opens the central pore both axially across the membrane and laterally toward the lipid bilayer. Comparisons with structures of Sec61 in other states suggest a pathway for how hydrophobic signals engage the channel to gain access to the lipid bilayer.

Co-translational protein targeting to the bacterial membrane

Co-translational protein targeting by the Signal Recognition Particle (SRP) is an essential cellular pathway that couples the synthesis of nascent proteins to their proper cellular localization. The bacterial SRP, which contains the minimal ribonucleoprotein core of this universally conserved targeting machine, has served as a paradigm for understanding the molecular basis of protein localization in all cells. In this review, we highlight recent biochemical and structural insights into the molecular mechanisms by which fundamental challenges faced by protein targeting machineries are met in the SRP pathway. Collectively, these studies elucidate how an essential SRP RNA and two regulatory GTPases in the SRP and SRP receptor (SR) enable this targeting machinery to recognize, sense and respond to its biological effectors, i.e. the cargo protein, the target membrane and the translocation machinery, thus driving efficient and faithful co-translational protein targeting. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Protein trafficking and secretion in bacteria. Guest Editors: Anastassios Economou and Ross Dalbey.

SecYEG activates GTPases to drive the completion of cotranslational protein targeting

SecYEG drives conformational changes in the cotranslational targeting complex to activate it for GTP hydrolysis and the handover of the translating ribosome.

Signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor (SR) comprise a highly conserved cellular machine that cotranslationally targets proteins to a protein-conducting channel, the bacterial SecYEG or eukaryotic Sec61p complex, at the target membrane. Whether SecYEG is a passive recipient of the translating ribosome or actively regulates this targeting machinery remains unclear. Here we show that SecYEG drives conformational changes in the cargo-loaded SRP–SR targeting complex that activate it for GTP hydrolysis and for handover of the translating ribosome. These results provide the first evidence that SecYEG actively drives the efficient delivery and unloading of translating ribosomes at the target membrane.

Activated GTPase movement on an RNA scaffold drives co-translational protein targeting

Roughly one third of the proteome is initially destined for the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum or the bacterial plasma membrane¹. The proper localization of these proteins is mediated by a universally conserved protein targeting machinery, the signal recognition particle (SRP), which recognizes ribosomes carrying signal sequences^2–4 and, via interactions with the SRP receptor^5,6, delivers them to the protein translocation machinery on the target membrane⁷. The SRP is an ancient ribonucleoprotein particle containing an essential, elongated SRP RNA whose precise functions have remained elusive. Here, we used single molecule fluorescence microscopy to demonstrate that the SRP-receptor GTPase complex, after initial assembly at the tetraloop end of SRP RNA, travels over 100 Å to the distal end of this RNA where rapid GTP hydrolysis occurs. This movement is negatively regulated by the translating ribosome and, at a later stage, positively regulated by the SecYEG translocon, providing an attractive mechanism to ensure the productive exchange of the targeting and translocation machineries at the ribosome exit site with exquisite spatial and temporal accuracy. Our results show that large RNAs can act as molecular scaffolds that enable the facile exchange of distinct factors and precise timing of molecular events in a complex cellular process; this concept may be extended to similar phenomena in other ribonucleoprotein complexes.

Defining the specificity of cotranslationally acting chaperones by systematic analysis of mRNAs associated with ribosome-nascent chain complexes

Polypeptides exiting the ribosome must fold and assemble in the crowded environment of the cell. Chaperones and other protein homeostasis factors interact with newly translated polypeptides to facilitate their folding and correct localization. Despite the extensive efforts, little is known about the specificity of the chaperones and other factors that bind nascent polypeptides. To address this question we present an approach that systematically identifies cotranslational chaperone substrates through the mRNAs associated with ribosome-nascent chain-chaperone complexes. We here focused on two Saccharomyces cerevisiae chaperones: the Signal Recognition Particle (SRP), which acts cotranslationally to target proteins to the ER, and the Nascent chain Associated Complex (NAC), whose function has been elusive. Our results provide new insights into SRP selectivity and reveal that NAC is a general cotranslational chaperone. We found surprising differential substrate specificity for the three subunits of NAC, which appear to recognize distinct features within nascent chains. Our results also revealed a partial overlap between the sets of nascent polypeptides that interact with NAC and SRP, respectively, and showed that NAC modulates SRP specificity and fidelity in vivo. These findings give us new insight into the dynamic interplay of chaperones acting on nascent chains. The strategy we used should be generally applicable to mapping the specificity, interplay, and dynamics of the cotranslational protein homeostasis network.

Discovery of functional motifs in h-regions of trypanosome signal sequences

N-terminal signal peptides direct secretory proteins into the ER (endoplasmic reticulum) of eukaryotes or the periplasmic space of prokaryotes. A hydrophobic core (h-region) is important for signal sequence function; however, the mechanism of h-region action is not resolved. To gain new insight into signal sequences, bioinformatic analysis of h-regions from humans, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Trypanosoma brucei and Escherichia coli was performed. Each species contains a unique set of peptide motifs (h-motifs) characterized by identity components (i.e. sequence of conserved amino acids) joined by spacers. Human h-motifs have four identity components, whereas those from the other species utilize three identity components. Example of h-motifs are human Hs3 {L-x(2)-[AGILPV]-L-x(0,2)-L}, S. cerevisiae Sc1 [L-x(0,2)-S-x(0,3)-A], T. brucei Tb2 {L-x(1,2)-L-[AILV]} and E. coli Ec1 [A-x(0,2)-L-x(0,3)-A]. The physiological relevance of h-motifs was tested with a T. brucei microsomal system for translocation of a VSG (variant surface glycoprotein)-117 signal peptide. Disruption of h-motifs by scrambling of sequences in h-regions produced defective signal peptides, although the hydrophobicity of the peptide was not altered. We conclude that: (i) h-regions harbour h-motifs, and are not random hydrophobic amino acids; (ii) h-regions from different species contain unique sets of h-motifs; and (iii) h-motifs contribute to the biological activity of ER signal peptides. h-Regions are ‘scaffolds’ in which functional h-motifs are embedded. A hypothetical model for h-motif interactions with a Sec61p protein translocon is presented.

Structure of monomeric yeast and mammalian Sec61 complexes interacting with the translating ribosome

The trimeric Sec61/SecY complex is a protein-conducting channel (PCC) for secretory and membrane proteins. Although Sec complexes can form oligomers, it has been suggested that a single copy may serve as an active PCC. We determined subnanometer-resolution cryo-electron microscopy structures of eukaryotic ribosome-Sec61 complexes. In combination with biochemical data, we found that in both idle and active states, the Sec complex is not oligomeric and interacts mainly via two cytoplasmic loops with the universal ribosomal adaptor site. In the active state, the ribosomal tunnel and a central pore of the monomeric PCC were occupied by the nascent chain, contacting loop 6 of the Sec complex. This provides a structural basis for the activity of a solitary Sec complex in cotranslational protein translocation.

Sec-dependent protein translocation across biological membranes: evolutionary conservation of an essential protein transport pathway (Review)

All living organisms, no matter how simple or complex, possess the ability to translocate proteins across biological membranes and into different cellular compartments. Although a range of membrane transport processes exist, the major pathway used to translocate proteins across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane or the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum membrane is conserved and is known as the Sec or Sec61 pathway, respectively. Over the past two decades the Sec and Sec61 pathways have been studied extensively and are well characterised at the genetic and biochemical levels. However, it is only now with the recent structural determination of a number of the key elements of the pathways that the translocation complex is beginning to give up its secrets in exquisite molecular detail. This article will focus on the routes of Sec- and Sec61-dependent membrane targeting and the nature of the translocation channel in bacteria and eukaryotes.

Inhibition of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Cotranslational Translocation by the Cyclopeptolide CAM741

The cyclopeptolide CAM741 inhibits cotranslational translocation of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM1), which is dependent on its signal peptide. We now describe the identification of the signal peptide of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as the second target of CAM741. The mechanism by which the compound inhibits translocation of VEGF is very similar or identical to that of VCAM1, although the signal peptides share no obvious sequence similarities. By mutagenesis of the VEGF signal peptide, two important regions, located in the N-terminal and hydrophobic segments, were identified as critical for compound sensitivity. CAM741 alters positioning of the VEGF signal peptide at the translocon, and increasing hydrophobicity in the h-region reduces compound sensitivity and causes a different, possibly more efficient, interaction with the translocon. Although CAM741 is effective against translocation of both VEGF and VCAM1, the derivative NFI028 is able to inhibit only VCAM1, suggesting that chemical derivatization can alter not only potency, but also the specificity of the compounds.

Substrate-specific translocational attenuation during ER stress defines a pre-emptive quality control pathway

Eukaryotic proteins entering the secretory pathway are translocated into the ER by signal sequences that vary widely in primary structure. We now provide a functional rationale for this long-observed sequence diversity by demonstrating that differences among signals facilitate substrate-selective modulation of protein translocation. We find that during acute ER stress, translocation of secretory and membrane proteins is rapidly and transiently attenuated in a signal sequence-selective manner. Their cotranslational rerouting to the cytosol for degradation reduces the burden of misfolded substrates entering the ER and represents a pathway for pre-emptive quality control (pQC). Bypassing the pQC pathway for the prion protein increases its rate of aggregation in the ER lumen during prolonged stress and renders cells less capable of viable recovery. Conversely, pharmacologically augmenting pQC during ER stress proved protective. Thus, protein translocation is a physiologically regulated process that is utilized for pQC as part of the ER stress response.

The translocation inhibitor CAM741 interferes with vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 signal peptide insertion at the translocon

The cyclopeptolide CAM741 selectively inhibits cotranslational translocation of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM1), a process that is dependent on its signal peptide. In this study we identified the C-terminal (C-) region upstream of the cleavage site of the VCAM1 signal peptide as most critical for inhibition of translocation by CAM741, but full sensitivity to the compound also requires residues of the hydrophobic (h-) region and the first amino acid of the VCAM1 mature domain. The murine VCAM1 signal peptide, which is less susceptible to translocation inhibition by CAM741, can be converted into a fully sensitive signal peptide by two amino acid substitutions identified as critical for compound sensitivity of the human VCAM1 signal peptide. Using cysteine substitutions of non-critical residues in the human VCAM1 signal peptide and chemical cross-linking of targeted short nascent chains we show that, in the presence of CAM741, the N- and C-terminal segments of the VCAM1 signal peptide could be cross-linked to the cytoplasmic tail of Sec61beta, indicating altered positioning of the VCAM1 signal peptide relative to this translocon component. Moreover, translocation of a tag fused N-terminal to the VCAM1 signal peptide is selectively inhibited by CAM741. Our data indicate that the compound inhibits translocation of VCAM1 by interfering with correct insertion of its signal peptide into the translocon.

Protein translocation by the Sec61/SecY channel

The conserved protein-conducting channel, referred to as the Sec61 channel in eukaryotes or the SecY channel in eubacteria and archaea, translocates proteins across cellular membranes and integrates proteins containing hydrophobic transmembrane segments into lipid bilayers. Structural studies illustrate how the protein-conducting channel accomplishes these tasks. Three different mechanisms, each requiring a different set of channel binding partners, are employed to move polypeptide substrates: The ribosome feeds the polypeptide chain directly into the channel, a ratcheting mechanism is used by the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum chaperone BiP, and a pushing mechanism is utilized by the bacterial ATPase SecA. We review these translocation mechanisms, relating biochemical and genetic observations to the structures of the protein-conducting channel and its binding partners.

Biogenesis of inner membrane proteins in Escherichia coli

Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli are surrounded by two membranes, the inner membrane and the outer membrane. The biogenesis of most inner membrane proteins (IMPs), typical alpha-helical proteins, appears to follow a partly conserved cotranslational pathway. Targeting involves a relatively simple signal recognition particle (SRP) and SRP-receptor. Insertion of most IMPs into the membrane occurs via the Sec-translocon, which is also used for the vectorial transport of secretory proteins. Similar to eukaryotic systems, little is known about the later stages of biogenesis of IMPs, the folding and assembly in the lipid bilayer. Recently, YidC has been identified as a factor that assists in the integration, folding, and assembly of IMPs both in association with the Sec-translocon and separately. This review deals mainly with recent structural and biochemical data from various experimental systems that offer new insight into the different stages of biogenesis of E. coli IMPs.

A eukaryotic carboxyl-terminal signal sequence translocating large hydrophilic domains across membranes

Yeast Golgi ecto-ATPase Ynd1p is an unusual type III membrane protein with the longest translocated N-terminus reported. Sequential deletion analysis reveals that translocation of this 500-residue-long hydrophilic domain across the membranes requires the C-terminal transmembrane domain of Ynd1p and its flanking regions. Additional studies indicate that the topogenic sequence of Ynd1p overrides the effect of a reverse signal-anchor sequence present at the N-terminus of Ynd1p, while it is not affected by a classic signal sequence at the N-terminus. When placed at the C-terminal end, the sequence can translocate large extracellular domains of two membrane proteins across the membranes. The data demonstrate the existence of a true eukaryotic C-terminal signal sequence.

An energy-dependent maturation step is required for release of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator from early endoplasmic reticulum biosynthetic machinery

Polytopic proteins are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by ribosomes docked at the Sec61 translocation channel. It is generally assumed that, upon termination of translation, polypeptides are spontaneously released into the ER membrane where final stages of folding and assembly are completed. Here we investigate early interactions between the ribosome-translocon complex and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), a multidomain ABC transporter, and demonstrate that this is not always the case. Using in vitro and Xenopus oocyte expression systems we show that, during and immediately following synthesis, nascent CFTR polypeptides associate with large, heterogeneous, and dynamic protein complexes. Partial-length precursors were quantitatively isolated in a non-covalent, puromycin-sensitive complex (>3,500 kDa) that contained the Sec61 ER translocation machinery and the cytosolic chaperone Hsc70. Following the completion of synthesis, CFTR was gradually released into a smaller (600-800 kDa) ATP-sensitive complex. Surprisingly, release of full-length CFTR from the ribosome and translocon was significantly delayed after translation was completed. Moreover, this step required both nucleotide triphosphates and cytosol. Release of control proteins varied depending on their size and domain complexity. These studies thus identify a novel energy-dependent step early in the CFTR maturation pathway that is required to disengage nascent CFTR from ER biosynthetic machinery. We propose that, contrary to current models, the final stage of membrane integration is a regulated process that can be influenced by the state of nascent chain folding, and we speculate that this step is influenced by the complex multidomain structure of CFTR.

A substrate-specific inhibitor of protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum

The segregation of secretory and membrane proteins to the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum is mediated by remarkably diverse signal sequences that have little or no homology with each other. Despite such sequence diversity, these signals are all recognized and interpreted by a highly conserved protein-conducting channel composed of the Sec61 complex. Signal recognition by Sec61 is essential for productive insertion of the nascent polypeptide into the translocation site, channel gating and initiation of transport. Although subtle differences in these steps can be detected between different substrates, it is not known whether they can be exploited to modulate protein translocation selectively. Here we describe cotransin, a small molecule that inhibits protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum. Cotransin acts in a signal-sequence-discriminatory manner to prevent the stable insertion of select nascent chains into the Sec61 translocation channel. Thus, the range of substrates accommodated by the channel can be specifically and reversibly modulated by a cell-permeable small molecule that alters the interaction between signal sequences and the Sec61 complex.

Probing the Environment of Signal−Anchor Sequences during Topogenesis in the Endoplasmic Reticulum

Signal sequences for insertion of protein into the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum orient themselves in the translocon on the basis of their flanking charges. It has recently been shown that hydrophobic N-terminal signals initially insert head-on before they invert their orientation to translocate the C-terminus. The rate of inversion is reduced with the increasing hydrophobicity of the signal due to an increased affinity for the initial bound state at the translocon. To probe the environment of the signal while its orientation is determined, different hydrophobic residues were inserted at various positions throughout a uniform oligoleucine signal sequence and the constructs were expressed in transfected COS-7 cells. The resulting topologies revealed a strikingly symmetric position dependence specifically for bulky aromatic amino acids, reflecting the structure of a lipid bilayer. Maximal N-translocation was observed when the guest residues were placed at the N- or C-terminus of the hydrophobic sequence or in the very center, corresponding to the positions of highest expected affinity of the signal sequence as a membrane-spanning helix for the bilayer. The results support the model that during topogenesis in vivo the signal sequence is exposed to the lipid membrane.

Topogenesis of membrane proteins at the endoplasmic reticulum

Most eukaryotic membrane proteins are cotranslationally integrated into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane by the Sec61 translocation complex. They are targeted to the translocon by hydrophobic signal sequences, which induce the translocation of either their N- or their C-terminal sequence. Signal sequence orientation is largely determined by charged residues flanking the apolar sequence (the positive-inside rule), folding properties of the N-terminal segment, and the hydrophobicity of the signal. Recent in vivo experiments suggest that N-terminal signals initially insert into the translocon head-on to yield a translocated N-terminus. Driven by a local electrical potential, the signal may invert its orientation and translocate the C-terminal sequence. Increased hydrophobicity slows down inversion by stabilizing the initial bound state. In vitro cross-linking studies indicate that signals rapidly contact lipids upon entering the translocon. Together with the recent crystal structure of the homologous SecYEbeta translocation complex of Methanococcus jannaschii, which did not reveal an obvious hydrophobic binding site for signals within the pore, a model emerges in which the translocon allows the lateral partitioning of hydrophobic segments between the aqueous pore and the lipid membrane. Signals may return into the pore for reorientation until translation is terminated. Subsequent transmembrane segments in multispanning proteins behave similarly and contribute to the overall topology of the protein.

Membrane-protein integration and the role of the translocation channel

Most eukaryotic membrane proteins are integrated into the lipid bilayer during their synthesis at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Their integration occurs with the help of a protein-conducting channel formed by the heterotrimeric Sec61 membrane-protein complex. The crystal structure of an archaeal homolog of the complex suggests mechanisms that enable the channel to open across the membrane and to release laterally hydrophobic transmembrane segments of nascent membrane proteins into lipid. Many aspects of membrane-protein integration remain controversial and poorly understood, but new structural data provide testable hypotheses. We propose a model of how the channel recognizes transmembrane segments, orients them properly with respect to the plane of the membrane and releases them into lipid. We also discuss how the channel would prevent small molecules from crossing the lipid bilayer while it is integrating proteins.

Signal Sequences Influence Membrane Integration of the Prion Protein

Biosynthesis of the prion protein at the endoplasmic reticulum generates multiple topological forms. The topology of an individual chain is determined first by the localization of the N terminus and then by potential integration of the transmembrane domain into the lipid bilayer. Here, we provide the first evidence that signal sequences affect the latter of these events by demonstrating that some but not other signal sequences and signal sequence mutations result in significant increases in the fraction of prion protein nascent chains that integrate into the lipid bilayer. Through analysis of the prolactin signal sequence, an especially poor integration effector, we find that the N terminal and hydrophobic regions of the signal sequence affect integration most significantly. Mutations in either region result in a considerable increase in the number of chains that integrate. The effect of the signal sequence cannot be attributed to timing of signal cleavage or the state of the ribosome membrane junction, parameters previously found to affect protein biogenesis. We also present evidence that signal sequences that are poor integration effectors can promote integration under experimental conditions that allow the nascent chain more time to integrate. These findings reveal a previously unappreciated relationship between signal sequences and transmembrane integration.

Sec61p contributes to signal sequence orientation according to the positive-inside rule

Protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum is mediated by signal or signal-anchor sequences. They also play an important role in protein topogenesis, because their orientation in the translocon determines whether their N- or C-terminal sequence is translocated. Signal orientation is primarily determined by charged residues flanking the hydrophobic core, whereby the more positive end is predominantly positioned to the cytoplasmic side of the membrane, a phenomenon known as the "positive-inside rule." We tested the role of conserved charged residues of Sec61p, the major component of the translocon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, in orienting signals according to their flanking charges by site-directed mutagenesis by using diagnostic model proteins. Mutation of R67, R74, or E382 in Sec61p reduced C-terminal translocation of a signal-anchor protein with a positive N-terminal flanking sequence and increased it for signal-anchor proteins with positive C-terminal sequences. These mutations produced a stronger effect on substrates with greater charge difference across the hydrophobic core of the signal. For some of the substrates, a charge mutation in Sec61p had a similar effect as one in the substrate polypeptides. Although these three residues do not account for the entire charge effect in signal orientation, the results show that Sec61p contributes to the positive-inside rule.

A Complex of Chaperones and Disulfide Isomerases Occludes the Cytosolic Face of the Translocation Protein Sec61p and Affects Translocation of the Prion Protein†

Secretion of newly synthesized proteins across the mammalian rough endoplasmic reticulum (translocation) is supported by the membrane proteins Sec61p and TRAM, but may also include accessory factors, depending on the particular translocation substrate. Studies designed to investigate the binding of anti-peptide antibodies to the carboxyl terminus of the alpha-subunit of Sec61 (Sec61palpha) lead us to the isolation of a complex of proteins that occlude the cytosolic face of Sec61palpha in microsomes that have been prepared by standard protocols used to study translocation in vitro [Walter, P., and Blobel, G. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 96, 84-93]. This complex was shown by nanospray tandem mass spectrometry to be composed of protein disulfide isomerase (PDI), calcium binding protein 1 (CABP1/P5), 72 kDa endoplasmic reticulum protein (ERp72), and BiP (heat shock protein A5/HSPA5), and has been named TR-PDI for "translocon-resident protein disulfide isomerase complex". This constitutes a novel location for these proteins, which are known to be major constituents of the lumen of the rough endoplasmic reticulum. We have not established the function of TR-PDI at this location, but did observe that the absence of this complex results in a relative loss of correct topology of prion protein insertion across RER membranes, indicating the possibility of a functional role in vivo.

A phaseolin domain involved directly in trimer assembly is a determinant for binding by the chaperone BiP

The binding protein (BiP; a member of the heat-shock 70 family) is a major chaperone of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Interactions with BiP are believed to inhibit unproductive aggregation of newly synthesized secretory proteins during folding and assembly. In vitro, BiP has a preference for peptide sequences enriched in hydrophobic amino acids, which are expected to be exposed only in folding and assembly intermediates or in defective proteins. However, direct information regarding sequences recognized in vivo by BiP on real proteins is very limited. We have shown previously that newly synthesized monomers of the homotrimeric storage protein phaseolin associate with BiP and that phaseolin trimerization in the ER abolishes such interactions. Using different phaseolin constructs and green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion proteins, we show here that one of the two alpha-helical regions of polypeptide contact in phaseolin trimers (35 amino acids located close to the C terminus and containing three potential BiP binding sites) effectively promotes BiP association with phaseolin and with secretory GFP fusions expressed in transgenic tobacco or in transfected protoplasts. We also show that overexpressed BiP transiently sequesters phaseolin polypeptides. We conclude that one of the regions of monomer contact is a BiP binding determinant and suggest that during the synthesis of phaseolin, the association with BiP and trimer formation are competing events. Finally, we show that the other, internal region of contact between monomers is necessary for phaseolin assembly in vivo and contains one potential BiP binding site.

Signal sequences initiate the pathway of maturation in the endoplasmic reticulum lumen

An interaction between an N-terminal signal sequence and the translocon leads to the initiation of protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum lumen. Subsequently, folding and modification of the substrate rapidly ensue. The close temporal coordination of these processes suggests that they may be structurally and functionally coordinated as well. Here we show that information encoded in the hydrophobic domain of a signal sequence influences the timing and efficiency of at least two steps in maturation, namely N-linked glycosylation and signal sequence cleavage. We demonstrate that these consequences correlate with and likely stem from the nature of the initial association made between the signal sequence and the translocon during the initiation of translocation. We propose a model by which these maturational events are controlled by the signal sequence-translocon interaction. Our work demonstrates that the pathway taken by a nascent chain through post-translational maturation depends on information encoded in its signal sequence.

Molecular mechanism of signal sequence orientation in the endoplasmic reticulum

We have analyzed in vivo how model signal sequences are inserted and oriented in the membrane during cotranslational integration into the endoplasmic reticulum. The results are incompatible with the current models of retention of positive flanking charges or loop insertion of the polypeptide into the translocon. Instead they indicate that these N-terminal signals initially insert head-on with a cytoplasmic C-terminus before they invert their orientation to translocate the C-terminus. The rate of inversion increases with more positive N-terminal charge and is reduced with increasing hydrophobicity of the signal. Inversion may proceed for up to approximately 50 s, when it is terminated by a signal-independent process. These findings provide a mechanism for the topogenic effects of flanking charges as well as of signal hydrophobicity.

Co-translational, intraribosomal cleavage of polypeptides by the foot-and-mouth disease virus 2A peptide

During co-translational protein import into the endoplasmic reticulum ribosomes are docked onto the translocon. This prevents inappropriate exposure of nascent chains to the cytosol and, conversely, cytosolic factors from gaining access to the nascent chain. We exploited this property of co-translational translocation to examine the mechanism of polypeptide cleavage by the 2A peptide of the foot-and-mouth disease virus. We find that the scission reaction is unaffected by placing 2A into a co-translationally targeted protein. Moreover, the portion of the polypeptide C-terminal to the cleavage site remains in the cytosol unless it contains its own signal sequence. The pattern of cleavage is consistent with the proposal that the 2A-mediated cleavage reaction occurs within the ribosome itself. In addition, our data indicate that the ribosome-translocon complex detects the break in the nascent chain and prevents any downstream protein lacking a signal sequence from gaining access to the endoplasmic reticulum.

Substrate-specific function of the translocon-associated protein complex during translocation across the ER membrane

Although the transport of model proteins across the mammalian ER can be reconstituted with purified Sec61p complex, TRAM, and signal recognition particle receptor, some substrates, such as the prion protein (PrP), are inefficiently or improperly translocated using only these components. Here, we purify a factor needed for proper translocation of PrP and identify it as the translocon-associated protein (TRAP) complex. Surprisingly, TRAP also stimulates vectorial transport of many, but not all, other substrates in a manner influenced by their signal sequences. Comparative analyses of several natural signal sequences suggest that a dependence on TRAP for translocation is not due to any single physical parameter, such as hydrophobicity of the signal sequence. Instead, a functional property of the signal, efficiency of its post-targeting role in initiating substrate translocation, correlates inversely with TRAP dependence. Thus, maximal translocation independent of TRAP can only be achieved with a signal sequence, such as the one from prolactin, whose strong interaction with the translocon mediates translocon gating shortly after targeting. These results identify the TRAP complex as a functional component of the translocon and demonstrate that it acts in a substrate-specific manner to facilitate the initiation of protein translocation.

Cotranslational partitioning of nascent prion protein into multiple populations at the translocation channel

The decisive events that direct a single polypeptide such as the prion protein (PrP) to be synthesized at the endoplasmic reticulum in both fully translocated and transmembrane forms are poorly understood. In this study, we demonstrate that the topological heterogeneity of PrP is determined cotranslationally, while at the translocation channel. By evaluating sequential intermediates during PrP topogenesis, we find that signal sequence-mediated initiation of translocation results in an interaction between nascent PrP and endoplasmic reticulum chaperones, committing the N terminus to the lumen. Synthesis of the transmembrane domain before completion of this step allows it to direct the generation of (Ctm)PrP, a transmembrane form with its N terminus in the cytosol. Thus, segregation of nascent PrP into different topological configurations is critically dependent on the precise timing of signal-mediated initiation of N-terminus translocation. Consequently, this step could be experimentally tuned to modify PrP topogenesis, including complete reversal of the elevated (Ctm)PrP caused by disease-associated mutations in the transmembrane domain. These results delineate the sequence of events involved in PrP biogenesis, explain the mechanism of action of (Ctm)PrP-favoring mutations associated with neurodegenerative disease, and more generally, reveal that translocation substrates can be cotranslationally partitioned into multiple populations at the translocon.

Endoplasmic reticulum-bound ribosomes reside in stable association with the translocon following termination of protein synthesis

In current views, translation-coupled ribosome binding to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane is transient, with association occurring via the signal recognition particle pathway and dissociation occurring upon the termination of protein synthesis. Recent studies indicate, however, that ribosomal subunits remain membrane-bound following the termination of protein synthesis. To define the mechanism of post-termination ribosome association with the ER membrane, membrane-bound ribosomes were detergent-solubilized from tissue culture cells at different stages of the protein synthesis cycle, and the composition of the ribosome-associated membrane protein fraction was determined. We report that ribosomes reside in stable association with the Sec61alpha-translocon following the termination stage of protein synthesis. Additionally, in vitro experiments revealed that solubilized, gradient-purified ribosome-translocon complexes were able to initiate the translation of secretory and cytosolic proteins and were functional in assays of signal sequence recognition. Using this experimental system, synthesis of signal sequence-bearing polypeptides yielded a tight ribosome-translocon junction; synthesis of nascent polypeptides lacking a signal sequence resulted in a disruption of this junction. On the basis of these data, we propose that in situ, ribosomes reside in association with the translocon throughout the cycle of protein synthesis, with membrane release occurring upon translation of proteins lacking topogenic signals.

Topological changes in the transmembrane domains of hepatitis C virus envelope glycoproteins

Hepatitis C virus proteins are synthesized as a polyprotein cleaved by a signal peptidase and viral proteases. The behaviour of internal signal sequences at the C-terminus of the transmembrane domains of hepatitis C virus envelope proteins E1 and E2 is essential for the topology of downstream polypeptides. We determined the topology of these transmembrane domains before and after signal sequence cleavage by tagging E1 and E2 with epitopes and by analysing their accessibility in selectively permeabilized cells. We showed that, after cleavage by signal peptidase in the endoplasmic reticulum, the C-terminal orientation of these transmembrane domains changed from luminal to cytosolic. The dynamic behaviour of these transmembrane domains is unique and it is linked to their multifunctionality. By reorienting their C-terminus toward the cytosol and being part of a transmembrane domain, the signal sequences at the C-terminus of E1 and E2 contribute to new functions: (i) membrane anchoring; (ii) E1E2 heterodimerization; and (iii) endoplasmic reticulum retention.

Signal sequences control gating of the protein translocation channel in a substrate-specific manner

N-terminal signal sequences mediate targeting of nascent chains to the endoplasmic reticulum and facilitate opening of the protein translocation channel to the passage of substrate. We have assessed each of these steps for a diverse set of mammalian signals. While minimal differences were seen in their targeting function, signal sequences displayed a remarkable degree of variation in initiating nascent chain access to the lumenal environment. Such substrate-specific properties of signals were evolutionarily conserved, functionally matched to their respective mature domains, and important for the proper biogenesis of some proteins. Thus, the sequence variations of signals do not simply represent functional degeneracy, but instead encode critical differences in translocon gating that are coordinated with their respective passengers to facilitate efficient translocation.

Architecture of the protein-conducting channel associated with the translating 80S ribosome

In vitro assembled yeast ribosome-nascent chain complexes (RNCs) containing a signal sequence in the nascent chain were immunopurified and reconstituted with the purified protein-conducting channel (PCC) of yeast endoplasmic reticulum, the Sec61 complex. A cryo-EM reconstruction of the RNC-Sec61 complex at 15.4 A resolution shows a tRNA in the P site. Distinct rRNA elements and proteins of the large ribosomal subunit form four connections with the PCC across a gap of about 10-20 A. Binding of the PCC influences the position of the highly dynamic rRNA expansion segment 27. The RNC-bound Sec61 complex has a compact appearance and was estimated to be a trimer. We propose a binary model of cotranslational translocation entailing only two basic functional states of the translating ribosome-channel complex.

Topogenesis of membrane proteins: determinants and dynamics

For targeting and integration of proteins into the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum, two types of signals can be distinguished: those that translocate their C-terminal sequence (cleavable signals and signal-anchors) and those that translocate their N-terminus (reverse signal-anchors). In addition to the well established effect of flanking charges, also the length and hydrophobicity of the apolar core of the signal as well as protein folding and glycosylation contribute to orienting the signal in the translocon. In multi-spanning membrane proteins, topogenic determinants are distributed throughout the sequence and may even compete with each other. During topogenesis, segments of up to 60 residues may move back and forth through the translocon, emphasizing unexpected dynamic aspects of topogenesis.

Effects of 'hydrophobic mismatch' on the location of transmembrane helices in the ER membrane

We have studied the effects of 'hydrophobic mismatch' between a poly-Leu transmembrane helix (TMH) and the ER membrane using a glycosylation mapping approach. The simplest interpretation of our results is that the lumenal end of the TMH is located deeper in the membrane for both short (negative mismatch) and long (positive mismatch) TMHs than for poly-Leu segments of intermediate length. We further find that the position-specific effect of Lys residues on the location of short TMHs in the membrane varies with an apparent helical periodicity when the Lys residue is moved along the poly-Leu stretch. We discuss these findings in the context of models for peptide-lipid interactions during hydrophobic mismatch.

Signal peptide cleavage of a type I membrane protein, HCMV US11, is dependent on its membrane anchor

The human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) US11 polypeptide is a type I membrane glycoprotein that targets major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules for destruction in a proteasome-dependent manner. Although the US11 signal sequence appears to be a classical N-terminal signal peptide in terms of its sequence and cleavage site, a fraction of newly synthesized US11 molecules retain the signal peptide after the N-linked glycan has been attached and translation of the US11 polypeptide has been completed. Delayed cleavage of the US11 signal peptide is determined by the first four residues, the so-called n-region of the signal peptide. Its replacement with the four N-terminal residues of the H-2K(b) signal sequence eliminates delayed cleavage. Surprisingly, a second region that affects the rate and extent of signal peptide cleavage is the transmembrane region close to the C-terminus of US11. Deletion of the transmembrane region of US11 (US11-180) significantly delays processing, a delay overcome by replacement with the H-2K(b) signal sequence. Thus, elements at a considerable distance from the signal sequence affect its cleavage.

In vivo kinetics of protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum determined by site-specific phosphorylation

We have developed a novel assay to detect the cytosolic localization of protein domains by inserting a short consensus sequence for phosphorylation by protein kinase A. In transfected COS-1 cells, this sequence was labeled efficiently with [(32)P]phosphate only when exposed to the cytosol and not when translocated into the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum. The phosphorylation state of this sequence can therefore be used to determine the topology of membrane proteins. This assay is sufficiently sensitive to detect even the transient cytosolic exposure of the N-terminal domain of a membrane protein with a reverse signal-anchor sequence. The extent of phosphorylation per newly synthesized polypeptide was shown to reflect the time of exposure to the cytosol, which depends on translation, targeting and translocation of the N-terminus. By altering the length of the N-terminal domain or manipulating the translation rate, it was determined that protein targeting is rapid and requires only a few seconds. The rate of N-terminal translocation was estimated to be approximately 1.6 times the rate of translation.

The Sec61p complex mediates the integration of a membrane protein by allowing lipid partitioning of the transmembrane domain

We have investigated how the transmembrane (TM) domain of a membrane protein is cotranslationally integrated into the endoplasmic reticulum. We demonstrate that the Sec61p channel allows the TM domain to bypass the barrier posed by the polar head groups of the lipid bilayer and come into contact with the hydrophobic interior of the membrane. Together with the TRAM protein, Sec61p provides a site in the membrane, at the interface of channel and lipid, through which a TM domain can dynamically equilibrate between the lipid and aqueous phases, depending on the hydrophobicity of the TM domain and the length of the polypeptide segment tethering it to the ribosome. Our results suggest a unifying, lipid-partitioning model which can explain the general behavior of hydrophobic topogenic sequences.

The topogenic contribution of uncharged amino acids on signal sequence orientation in the endoplasmic reticulum

Signal sequences for insertion of proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum induce translocation of either the C- or the N-terminal sequence across the membrane. The end that is translocated is primarily determined by the flanking charges and the hydrophobic domain of the signal. To characterize the hydrophobic contribution to topogenesis, we have challenged the translocation machinery in vivo in transfected COS cells with model proteins differing exclusively in the apolar segment of the signal. Homo-oligomers of hydrophobic amino acids as different in size and shape as Val(19), Trp(19), and Tyr(22) generated functional signal sequences with similar topologies in the membrane. The longer a homo-oligomeric sequence of a given residue, the more N-terminal translocation was obtained. To determine the topogenic contribution of all uncharged amino acids in the context of a hydrophobic signal sequence, two residues in a generic oligoleucine signal were exchanged for all uncharged amino acids. The resulting scale resembles a hydrophobicity scale with the more hydrophobic residues promoting N-terminal translocation. In addition, the helix breakers glycine and proline showed a position-dependent effect, which raises the possibility of a conformational contribution to topogenesis.

Roles of molecular chaperones in pancreatic secretion and their involvement in intestinal absorption

This review focuses on the contribution of molecular chaperones in the secretory process of digestive enzymes and their interaction with enterocytes. By using biochemistry and immunocytochemistry, we have shown that Grp94, Cpn10, Cpn60, and protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) are present all along the rough endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi-granule secretory pathway of the pancreatic acinar cells and are secreted into the acinar lumen. Two other molecular chaperones, Grp78 and the Hsp70, appear to be restricted to the rough endoplasmic reticulum and the trans-Golgi apparatus, respectively. We have found that chaperones can be associated with pancreatic enzymes along the secretory pathway. Indeed, double immunogold and immunocoprecipitation revealed an association between Cpn60 and the colipase-dependent lipase (CDL) and between Grp94 and the bile salt-dependent lipase (BSDL). These complexes are secreted into the acinar lumen and diverted to the duodenal lumen. These findings led us to investigate these enzyme-chaperone complexes in intestinal tissue. Grp94, Cpn60, and PDI are present on microvilli and on the endosomal compartment of enterocytes. Furthermore, we have shown that the Grp94-BSDL complexes are internalized by enterocytes through classical endocytosis. Upon dissociation of the BSDL-Grp94 complex in the late endosome, BSDL is transferred to the basolateral membrane. We propose that Grp94 interacts with specific receptors and/or could force the associated protein to adopt a specific conformation that allows its binding to corresponding membrane receptors and its internalization by enterocytes. These two hypotheses need not to be exclusive. The existence of such a pancreatic secretion-intestinal absorption link speaks in favor of a coordinated functional connection between these two entities, through molecular chaperones, in order to optimize intestinal activities.

Mammalian Sec61 is associated with Sec62 and Sec63

In yeast, efficient protein transport across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane may occur co-translationally or post-translationally. The latter process is mediated by a membrane protein complex that consists of the Sec61p complex and the Sec62p-Sec63p subcomplex. In contrast, in mammalian cells protein translocation is almost exclusively co-translational. This transport depends on the Sec61 complex, which is homologous to the yeast Sec61p complex and has been identified in mammals as a ribosome-bound pore-forming membrane protein complex. We report here the existence of ribosome-free mammalian Sec61 complexes that associate with two ubiquitous proteins of the ER membrane. According to primary sequence analysis both proteins display homology to the yeast proteins Sec62p and Sec63p and are therefore named Sec62 and Sec63, respectively. The probable function of the mammalian Sec61-Sec62-Sec63 complex is discussed with respect to its abundance in ER membranes, which, in contrast to yeast ER membranes, apparently lack efficient post-translational translocation activity.

Site-specific photocrosslinking to probe interactions of Arf1 with proteins involved in budding of COPI vesicles

ADP-ribosylation factor 1 (Arf1) plays an important role in early and intra-Golgi protein trafficking. During this process, Arf1 interacts with many different proteins and other molecules that regulate its state of activation or are involved in its intracellular function. To determine which of these proteins interact directly with Arf1 during coat protein type I (COPI) vesicle biogenesis, we probed the molecular environment of Arf1 by use of site-specific photocrosslinking. This method was first used successfully in the field of protein trafficking to study the mechanisms involved in protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum during protein synthesis. In such a hydrophobic environment, crosslink yields of up to 30% have been observed. We have now applied this method to study the mechanism of vesicle budding from the cytosolic face of the Golgi apparatus, an aqueous environment. Although the crosslink yield is significantly lower under these conditions, due to predominant reaction of the photolabile probes with water, a specific interaction of Arf1 with subunits of coatomer, the major coat protein of COPI vesicles, could readily be identified.

Cholera toxin is exported from microsomes by the Sec61p complex

After endocytosis cholera toxin is transported to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), from where its A1 subunit (CTA1) is assumed to be transferred to the cytosol by an as-yet unknown mechanism. Here, export of CTA1 from the ER to the cytosol was investigated in a cell-free assay using either microsomes loaded with CTA1 by in vitro translation or reconstituted microsomes containing CTA1 purified from V. cholerae. Export of CTA1 from the microsomes was time- and adenosine triphosphate-dependent and required lumenal ER proteins. By coimmunoprecipitation CTA1 was shown to be associated during export with the Sec61p complex, which mediates import of proteins into the ER. Export of CTA1 was inhibited when the Sec61p complexes were blocked by nascent polypeptides arrested during import, demonstrating that the export of CTA1 depended on translocation-competent Sec61p complexes. Export of CTA1 from the reconstituted microsomes indicated the de novo insertion of the toxin into the Sec61p complex from the lumenal side. Our results suggest that Sec61p complex-mediated protein export from the ER is not restricted to ER-associated protein degradation but is also used by bacterial toxins, enabling their entry into the cytosol of the target cell.

Ribosome-independent regulation of translocon composition and Sec61alpha conformation

In this study, the contributions of membrane-bound ribosomes to the regulation of endoplasmic reticulum translocon composition and Sec61alpha conformation were examined. Following solubilization of rough microsomes (RM) with digitonin, ribosomes co-sedimented in complexes containing the translocon proteins Sec61alpha, ribophorin I, and TRAPalpha, and endoplasmic reticulum phospholipids. Complexes of similar composition were identified in digitonin extracts of ribosome-free membranes, indicating that the ribosome does not define the composition of the digitonin-soluble translocon. Whereas in digitonin solution a highly electrostatic ribosome-translocon junction is observed, no stable interactions between ribosomes and Sec61alpha, ribophorin I, or TRAPalpha were observed following solubilization of RM with lipid-derived detergents at physiological salt concentrations. Sec61alpha was found to exist in at least two conformational states, as defined by mild proteolysis. A protease-resistant form was observed in RM and detergent-solubilized RM. Removal of peripheral proteins and ribosomes markedly enhanced the sensitivity of Sec61alpha to proteolysis, yet the readdition of inactive ribosomes to salt-washed membranes yielded only modest reductions in protease sensitivity. Addition of sublytic concentrations of detergents to salt-washed RM markedly decreased the protease sensitivity of Sec61alpha, indicating that a protease-resistant conformation of Sec61alpha can be conferred in a ribosome-independent manner.

Distinct domains within yeast Sec61p involved in post-translational translocation and protein dislocation

The translocation of secretory polypeptides into and across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) occurs at the translocon, a pore-forming structure that orchestrates the transport and maturation of polypeptides at the ER membrane. Recent data also suggest that misfolded or unassembled polypeptides exit the ER via the translocon for degradation by the cytosolic ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. Sec61p is a highly conserved multispanning membrane protein that constitutes a core component of the translocon. We have found that the essential function of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sec61p is retained upon deletion of either of two internal regions that include transmembrane domains 2 and 3, respectively. However, a deletion mutation encompassing both of these domains was found to be nonfunctional. Characterization of yeast mutants expressing the viable deletion alleles of Sec61p has revealed defects in post-translational translocation. In addition, the transmembrane domain 3 deletion mutant is induced for the unfolded protein response and is defective in the dislocation of a misfolded ER protein. These data demonstrate that the various activities of Sec61p can be functionally dissected. In particular, the transmembrane domain 2 region plays a role in post-translational translocation that is required neither for cotranslational translocation nor for protein dislocation.

The translocon: a dynamic gateway at the ER membrane

Cotranslational protein translocation across and integration into the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) occur at sites termed translocons. Translocons are composed of several ER membrane proteins that associate to form an aqueous pore through which secretory proteins and lumenal domains of membrane proteins pass from the cytoplasm to the ER lumen. These sites are not passive holes in the bilayer, but instead are quite dynamic both structurally and functionally. Translocons cycle between ribosome-bound and ribosome-free states, and convert between translocation and integration modes of operation. These changes in functional state are accompanied by structural rearrangements that alter translocon conformation, composition, and interactions with ligands such as the ribosome and BiP. Recent studies have revealed that the translocon is a complex and sophisticated molecular machine that regulates the movement of polypeptides through the bilayer, apparently in both directions as well as laterally into the bilayer, all while maintaining the membrane permeability barrier.