Analysis of muscle protein expression in polyethylene glycol-induced chicken: rat myoblast heterokaryons

Biological implications of cell fusion

Until recently, cells were thought to be integral and discrete components of tissues, and their state was determined by cell differentiation. However, under some conditions, stem cells or their progeny can fuse with cells of other types, mixing cytoplasmic and even genetic material of different (heterotypic) origins. The fusion of heterotypic cells could be of central importance for development, repair of tissues and the pathogenesis of disease.

Spontaneous fusion of cells between species yields transdifferentiation and retroviral transfer in vivo

Human cells can fuse with damaged or diseased somatic cells in vivo. Whether human cells fuse in vivo in the absence of disease and with cells of disparate species is unknown. Such a question is of current interest because blood exchanges between species through direct physical contact, via insect vectors or parasitism, are thought to underlie the transmission of zoonotic agents. In a model of human-pig chimerism, we show that some human hematopoietic stem cells engrafted in pigs contain both human and porcine chromosomal DNA. These hybrid cells divide, express human and porcine proteins, and contribute to porcine nonhematopoietic tissues. In addition, the hybrid cells contain porcine endogenous retroviral DNA sequences and are able to transmit this virus to uninfected human cells in vitro. Thus, spontaneous fusion can occur in vivo between the cells of disparate species and in the absence of disease. The ability of these cell hybrids to acquire and transmit retroviral elements together with their ability to integrate into tissues could explain genetic recombination and generation of novel pathogens. * differentiation * fusion * retrovirus

Characterization of heterokaryons between skeletal myoblasts and somatic cells formed by fusion with HVJ (Sendai virus); effects on myogenic differentiation

In skeletal myogenic differentiation, myoblasts fuse with myogenic cells spontaneously, but do not fuse with non-myogenic cells either in vivo or in vitro, suggesting that the fusion of myoblasts with non-myogenic cells is unsuitable for differentiation. To understand the inevitability of the fusion among myoblasts, we prepared heterokaryons in crosses between quail myoblasts transformed with a temperature-sensitive mutant of Rous sarcoma virus (QM-RSV cells) and rodent non-myogenic cells, such as tumor cells, fibroblasts, or neurogenic cells by HVJ (Sendai virus) and examined how myogenic differentiation was influenced in the prepared heterokaryons, focusing on myogenin expression and myofibril formation as markers of differentiation. When presumptive QM-RSV cells were fused with non-myogenic cells by HVJ and induced to differentiate, both myogenin expression and myofibril formation were suppressed. When myotubes of QM-RSV cells that had already expressed myogenin and formed myofibrils were fused with non-myogenic cells, both myogenin and myofibrils disappeared. Especially, fibrous structures of myofibrils were significantly lost and dots or aggregations of F-actin were formed within 24 hr after formation of heterokaryons. However, the fusion of presumptive or differentiated QM-RSV cells with rodent myoblasts did not disturb myogenin expression or myofibril formation. These results suggest that mutual fusion of myoblasts is indispensable for normal myogenic differentiation irrespective of the species, and that some factors inhibiting myogenic differentiation exist in the cytoplasm of non-myogenic cells, but not in myoblasts.

Myotube formation is delayed but not prevented in MyoD-deficient skeletal muscle: studies in regenerating whole muscle grafts of adult mice

We compared the time course of myogenic events in vivo in regenerating whole muscle grafts in MyoD(-/-) and control BALB/c adult mice using immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy. Immunohistochemistry with antibodies to desmin and myosin revealed a striking delay by about 3 days in the formation of myotubes in MyoD(-/-) autografts compared with BALB/c mice. However, myotube formation was not prevented, and autografts in both strains appeared similar by 8 days. Electron microscopy confirmed myotube formation in 8- but not 5-day MyoD(-/-) grafts. This pattern was not influenced by cross-transplantation experiments between strains examined at 5 days. Antibodies to proliferating cell nuclear antigen demonstrated an elevated level of replication by MyoD(-/-) myoblasts in autografts, and replication was sustained for about 3 days compared with controls. These data indicate that the delay in the onset of differentiation and hence fusion is related to extended proliferation of the MyoD(-/-) myoblasts. Overall, although muscle regeneration was delayed it was not impaired in MyoD(-/-) mice in this model.

Plasticity of cell fate: insights from heterokaryons

Experiments with somatic cell hybrids and stable heterokaryons have demonstrated that differentiated cells exhibit a remarkable capacity to change. Heterokaryons have been particularly useful in determining the extent to which the differentiated state of a cell is plastic. Cell fate can be altered by a change in the balance of positive and negative trans-acting regulators. Although a single regulator may be sufficient in certain environments to trigger a change in cell fate, that regulator may be ineffective in other cell contexts where it encounters a different composition of regulators.

Limitations of nls beta-galactosidase as a marker for studying myogenic lineage or the efficacy of myoblast transfer

BACKGROUND

Nuclear localizing beta-galactosidase (nls beta-gal) is used as a marker for studying myoblast cell lineage and for evaluating myoblast survival after myoblast transfer, a procedure with potential use for gene complementation for muscular dystrophy. Usefulness of this construct depends on the establishment of the extent to which nls beta-gal or its mRNA may be translocated from the nucleus that encodes it to other non-coding myonuclei in hybrid myofibers and the ease with which the encoding and non-coding myonuclei can be distinguished. Previous in vitro studies (Ralston and Hall 1989. Science, 244:1066-1068) have suggested limited translocation of the fusion protein. We re-examined the extent to which nls beta-gal is translocated in hybrid myofibers, both in vitro and in vivo, and evaluated the extent to which one can rely on histochemistry to distinguish encoding from non-coding nuclei in these myofibers.

METHODS

Myotubes formed in co-cultures of a myoblast line (MM14 cells), stably transfected with a construct consisting of a nls beta-gal under the control of the myosin light chain 3F promoter and 3' enhancer (3FlacZ10 cells), and [3H]-thymidine-labeled parental MM14 cells (plated at ratios of 1:6 or 1:20, respectively) were reacted with X-gal. After autoradiography, the distance over which nls beta-gal was translocated in hybrid myotubes was determined. In vivo translocation of nls beta-gal was evaluated by injecting [3H]-thymidine-labeled 3FlacZ10 myoblasts into the regenerating extensor digitorum longus muscle of immunosuppressed normal and mdx (dystrophin deficient) mice. Sections stained with X-gal and subjected to autoradiography permitted determination of the extent of nls beta-gal translocation in hybrid myofibers.

RESULTS

In vitro: All nuclei in > 92% of hybrid myotubes showed evidence of nls beta-gal after exposure to X-gal, suggesting extensive translocation. Within hybrid myotubes, MM14-derived myonuclei approximately 350 microns from a 3FlacZ10-derived myonucleus showed evidence of nls beta-gal. In vivo: Similar translocation of nls beta-gal was observed in vivo. One week after myoblast transfer, donor-derived myonuclei were distinguishable from host-derived myonuclei containing nls beta-gal by the greater accumulation of reaction product in donor myonuclei after X-gal staining. However, 2 weeks after injection, host myonuclei often contained a significant amount of nls beta-gal, and accumulation of reaction product could not be used as the criterion for identification of donor myonuclei.

CONCLUSIONS

Translocation of nls beta-gal (or its mRNA) is significantly greater than previously reported (Ralston and Hall 1989), resulting in large numbers of nls beta-gal positive non-coding myonuclei in hybrid myofibers. One week after myoblast transfer, distinguishing between nls beta-gal encoding and non-coding myonuclei in hybrid myofibers after X-gal staining of sectioned muscle is feasible; however, by 2 weeks, nls beta-gal increases in host myonuclei, making identification of donor-derived myonuclei problematic. Translocation of nls beta-gal to non-coding myonuclei in hybrid myofibers must be considered when nls beta-gal is used for studies of myogenic lineage or the efficacy of myoblast transfer therapy, particularly if long-term survival of hybrid myotubes is required.

Movement of Ca(2+)-ATPase molecules within the sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum in skeletal muscle

The endoplasmic reticulum undergoes rapid, microscopic changes in its structure, including extension and anastomosis of tubular elements. Such dynamism is expected to manifest itself also as rapid intermixing of membrane components, at least within subdomains of the endoplasmic reticulum. Here we present evidence of a similar dynamism in the sarcoplasmic reticulum of developing skeletal muscle. The sarcoplasmic reticulum is sometimes considered a specialized type of endoplasmic reticulum, but it appears to be a rather static set of membrane-bound elements, repetitively arranged to enwrap each sarcomere of each myofibril. Both endoplasmic reticulum and sarcoplasmic reticulum contain P-type Ca(2+)-ATPases that transport calcium from the cytosol into their lumen. In the experiments reported here, chicken and mouse cells were fused by polyethylene glycol, natural myogenic cell fusion, or Sendai virus. The redistribution of Ca(2+)-ATPase molecules between chick and mouse endoplasmic reticulum/sarcoplasmic reticulum was followed by immunofluorescence microscopy in which species-specific monoclonal antibodies to chick and mouse Ca(2+)-ATPases were used. Redistribution was time- and temperature-dependent but independent of protein synthesis as well as the method of cell fusion. Intermixing occurred on a time scale of tens of minutes at 37 degrees C. These results verify the dynamic nature of the sarcoplasmic reticulum and illustrate an aspect of the special relationship between endoplasmic reticulum and sarcoplasmic reticulum.

Uncoupling of muscle-specific protein expression in myocyte x myoblast heterokaryons

The inducibility of several rat skeletal muscle proteins was examined in heterokaryons formed by fusing differentiated chick myocytes to undifferentiated rat myoblasts. Chicken and rat proteins were distinguished using species-specific antibodies or by their different migrations in polyacrylamide or agarose gels. Both rat skeletal myosin light chain 1 and rat alpha-tropomyosin were induced in the heterokaryons. In contrast, neither rat acetylcholine receptors nor creatine kinase could be detected. These results suggest that chick myocytes may contain quantities of regulatory factors that are sufficient for the activation of some but not all of these rat muscle-specific proteins within the cellular context of the heterokaryon.

How fixed is the differentiated state? Lessons from heterokaryons

The differentiated state is highly stable in vivo. Yet, in response to nuclear transplantation, tissue regeneration or cell fusion, the nuclei of differentiated cells exhibit a remarkable capacity to change. I review here the utility of heterokaryons, multinucleated cell hybrids, in elucidating the mechanisms that establish and maintain the differentiated state and yet allow such plasticity.

Heterokaryon analysis of muscle differentiation: regulation of the postmitotic state

MM14 mouse myoblasts withdraw irreversibly from the cell cycle and become postmitotic within a few hours of being deprived of fibroblast growth factor (Clegg, C. H., T. A. Linkhart, B. B. Olwin, and S. D. Hauschka, 1987, J. Cell Biol., 105:949-956). To examine the mechanisms that may regulate this developmental state of skeletal muscle, we tested the mitogen responsiveness of various cell types after their polyethylene glycol-mediated fusion with post-mitotic myocytes. Heterokaryons containing myocytes and quiescent nonmyogenic cells such as 3T3, L cell, and a differentiation-defective myoblast line (DD-1) responded to mitogen-rich medium by initiating DNA synthesis. Myonuclei replicated DNA and reexpressed thymidine kinase. In contrast, (myocyte x G1 myoblast) heterokaryons failed to replicate DNA in mitogen-rich medium and became postmitotic. This included cells with a nuclear ratio of three myoblasts to one myocyte. Proliferation dominance in (myocyte x 3T3 cell) and (myocyte x DD-1) heterokaryons was conditionally regulated by the timing of mitogen treatment; such cells became postmitotic when mitogen exposure was delayed for as little as 6 h after cell fusion. In addition, (myocyte x DD-1) heterokaryons expressed a muscle-specific trait and lost epidermal growth factor receptors when they became postmitotic. These results demonstrate that DNA synthesis is not irreversibly blocked in skeletal muscle; myonuclei readily express proliferation-related functions when provided with a mitogenic signal. Rather, myocyte-specific repression of DNA synthesis in heterokaryons argues that the postmitotic state of skeletal muscle is regulated by diffusible factors that inhibit processes of cellular mitogenesis.

Expression of myoblast and myocyte antigens in relation to differentiation and the cell cycle

Cell cycle parameters and expression of myoblast and myocyte antigens were investigated during exponential growth and during the differentiation phase of rat L8( E63 ) myoblasts by an integrated approach involving microspectrophotometry with DNA fluorochromes, [3H]thymidine autoradiography, and immunofluorescent staining with monoclonal antibodies. In addition to the majority of cells which are recruited into myotubes, two distinct populations of mononucleate cells were resolved in cultures of rat myoblasts undergoing differentiation. These mononucleate cells consist of (1) a population of proliferating cells with a prolonged G1 transit time; (2) a population of non-proliferating cells which remain arrested in G1 for more than 72 h. The latter group was examined with respect to the expression of two marker antigens recognized by two monoclonal antibodies: antibody B58 reacts with a macromolecular component present in undifferentiated myoblasts but not in mature myotubes, and antibody XMlb reacts with a muscle-specific isoform of myosin. All four possible combinations of expression of these antigens by single cells were found: B58 +XM1b -, B58 +XM1b +, B58 - XM1b -, and B58 - XMlb +. The implication of these findings with respect to the transition from the proliferative to the differentiative phase of myogenesis is discussed.

Extinction of muscle-specific properties in somatic cell heterokaryons

In studies of gene regulation using somatic cell fusion techniques, the analysis of heterokaryons circumvents several problematic aspects of the more traditional approach utilizing proliferating hybrid cells. We have analyzed the expression of muscle specific properties in heterokaryons between muscle and nonmuscle cells in order to investigate whether differentiating cells contain regulatory factors that repress the expression of alternative developmental pathways. Heterokaryons and cybrids were derived from polyethylene glycol-mediated fusion of differentiated mononucleate chicken myocytes with mouse melanoma cells, mouse melanoma cytoplasts, chicken fibroblasts, or other chicken myocytes. Our results demonstrate that fusion of a myocyte with a nonmyogenic cell generally results in extinction of muscle-specific properties in the immediate fusion product. Myocyte X melanoma heterokaryons ceased to express the skeletal muscle forms of myosin, desmin and creatine kinase, reinitiated DNA synthesis, and showed a loss of spontaneous fusion competence within 96 hr after their formation. Although chicken myocyte X mouse melanoma heterokaryons showed extinction of muscle specific properties, they continued to synthesize protein and to incorporate [3H]hypoxanthine, presumably due to the continued production of constitutive chicken HPRT. That presence of the melanoma nucleus was required for extinction to be observed was demonstrated by the continued expression of muscle proteins in cybrids between chicken myocytes and melanoma cytoplasts. Significantly, heterokaryons between chicken myocytes and chicken fibroblasts also exhibited extinction of muscle proteins, demonstrating for the first time that extinction is not restricted to fusions in which at least one parental cell type was derived from an established cell line. Our results strongly support the notion that extinction reflects cell-type specific gene regulatory mechanisms operative during development.

Do hydrophobic sequences cleaved from cellular polypeptides induce membrane fusion reactions in vivo?

The concept that a direct interaction between Ca2+ and phospholipids is a major factor in membrane fusion reactions is questioned. Attention is drawn to a number of findings on associations between fusion and the proteolysis of membrane proteins. It is proposed that hydrophobic polypeptides, which are functionally comparable to the fusogenic proteins of certain viruses but which are produced in cells by the endogenous proteolysis of membrane and cellular proteins, may induce membrane fusion reactions in vivo.