Immunogenicity of pneumococcal vaccine in heart transplant recipients

COVID-Related Chronic Allograft Dysfunction in Lung Transplant Recipients: Long-Term Follow-up Results from Infections Occurring in the Pre-vaccination Era

Introduction: We report on characteristics and lung function outcomes among lung transplant recipients (LTRs) after COVID-19 with infections occurring in the first year of the coronavirus pandemic prior to introduction of the vaccines. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 18 LTRs who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between 1 February 2020 and 1 March 2021. The mean age was 49.9 (22–68) years; 12 patients (67%) were male. Two patients died due to severe COVID-19. Results: During the study period, there were 18 lung transplant recipients with a community-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this cohort, seven had mild, nine had moderate, and two had severe COVID-19. All patients with mild and moderate COVID-19 survived, but the two patients with severe COVID-19 died in the intensive care unit while intubated and on mechanical ventilation. Most patients with moderate COVID-19 showed a permanent lung function decrease that did not improve after 12 months. Conclusion: A majority of LTRs in the current cohort did not experience an alteration in the trajectory of FEV1 evolution after developing SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, in the patients with moderate COVID-19, most patients had a decline in the FEV1 that was present after 1 month after recovery and did not improve or even deteriorated further after 12 months. In LTRs, COVID-19 can have long-lasting effects on pulmonary function. Treatment strategies that influence this trajectory are needed.

Antibiotic Management of Patients with Hematologic Malignancies: From Prophylaxis to Unusual Infections

Purpose of Review

Patients with hematological malignancies are recognized for their high susceptibility and increased risk of developing infections associated with immunosuppression that can be caused by the infection itself or by the treatments that condition a decrease in the humoral and T lymphocyte response, so this review attempts to gather the main bacterial, viral, parasitic, and fungal agents that affect them and give recommendations for their approach and diagnosis.

Recent Findings

In recent years, with the discovery and use of new therapies including immunological and targeted treatments, it has been possible to improve the survival and response of patients with hematological malignancies; however, antimicrobial resistance has also increased; we have faced new and unknown microorganisms, such as the SARS-CoV-2 that caused the COVID-19 pandemic in the past year, and therefore, new risks and more severe infections are presented.

Summary

We present a review of the different circumstances where hematological malignancies increased the risk of infections and which microorganisms affect these patients, their characteristics, and the suggested prophylaxis.

Safety and recommendations for vaccinations of children with inborn errors of metabolism

Inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) are genetic disorders due to a defective metabolic pathway. The incidence of each disorder is variable and depends on the respective population. Some disorders such as urea cycle disorders (UCD) and organic acidurias, pose a high risk for a metabolic crisis culminating in a life-threatening event, especially during infections; thus, vaccines may play a crucial role in prevention. However, there are different triggers for decompensations including the notion that vaccines themselves can activate fever and malaise. Additionally, many of the IEM include immunodeficiency, placing the patients at an increased risk for infectious diseases and possibly a weaker response to immunizations. Since metabolic crises and vaccine regimens intersect in the first years of life, the question whether to vaccinate the child occupies parents and medical staff. Many metabolic experts hesitate to vaccinate IEM patients, disregarding the higher risk from the direct infections. In this paper we summarize the published data regarding the safety and recommendations for vaccinations in IEM patients, with reference to the risk for decompensations and to the immunogenic component.

The Importance of Prioritizing Pre and Posttransplant Immunizations in an Era of Vaccine Refusal and Epidemic Outbreaks

Vaccine-preventable infections are occurring at epidemic rates both nationally and internationally. At the same time, rates of vaccine hesitancy and refusal are increasing across the country leading to decreased herd immunity. For immunosuppressed transplant recipients, this situation poses great risk. Currently, 1 in 6 pediatric solid organ transplant recipients is hospitalized with a vaccine-preventable infection in the first 5 years posttransplant. For many recipients, these infections result in significant morbidity, mortality, and increased hospitalization costs. Surprisingly, despite this risk many transplant recipients are not up-to-date on age appropriate immunizations at the time of transplant and thereafter. As a transplant community, we must prioritize immunizations in both pre and posttransplant care. Research is needed to understand how to monitor immune response to vaccines in immunosuppressed patients and when to optimally immunize patients posttransplant. Finally, recommendations about administration of live vaccines posttransplant may need to be reevaluated in the setting of measles outbreaks and decreased herd immunity.

Under-immunization of pediatric transplant recipients: a call to action for the pediatric community

Vaccine-preventable infections (VPIs) are a common and serious complication following transplantation. One in six pediatric solid organ transplant recipients is hospitalized with a VPI in the first 5 years following transplant and these hospitalizations result in significant morbidity, mortality, graft injury, and cost. Immunizations are a minimally invasive, cost-effective approach to reducing the incidence of VPIs. Despite published recommendations for transplant candidates to receive all age-appropriate immunizations, under-immunization remains a significant problem, with the majority of transplant recipients not up-to-date on age-appropriate immunizations at the time of transplant. This is extremely concerning as the rate for non-medical vaccine exemptions in the United States (US) is increasing, decreasing the reliability of herd immunity to protect patients undergoing transplant from VPIs. There is an urgent need to better understand barriers to vaccinating this population of high-risk children and to develop effective interventions to overcome these barriers and improve immunization rates. Strengthened national policies requiring complete age-appropriate immunization for non-emergent transplant candidates, along with improved multi-disciplinary immunization practices and tools to facilitate and ensure complete immunization delivery to this high-risk population, are needed to ensure that we do everything possible to prevent infectious complications in pediatric transplant recipients.

Practical Guide to Vaccination in All Stages of CKD, Including Patients Treated by Dialysis or Kidney Transplantation

Infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), including those receiving maintenance dialysis or with a kidney transplant. Although responses to vaccines are impaired in these populations, immunizations remain an important component of preventative care due to their favorable safety profiles and the high rate of infection in these patients. Most guidelines for patients with CKD focus on the importance of the hepatitis B, influenza, and pneumococcal vaccines in addition to age-appropriate immunizations. More data are needed to determine the clinical efficacy of these immunizations and others in this population and define optimal dosing and timing for administration. Studies have suggested that there may be a benefit to immunization before the onset of dialysis or transplantation because patients with early-stage CKD generally have higher rates of seroconversion. Because nephrologists often serve as primary care physicians for patients with CKD, it is important to understand the role of vaccinations in the preventive care of this patient population.

Usefulness of a systematic approach at listing for vaccine prevention in solid organ transplant candidates

Solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates may not be immune against potentially vaccine-preventable diseases because of insufficient immunizations and/or limited vaccine responses. We evaluated the impact on vaccine immunity at transplant of a systematic vaccinology workup at listing that included (1) pneumococcal with and without influenza immunization, (2) serology-based vaccine recommendations against measles, varicella, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis A virus, and tetanus, and (3) the documentation of vaccines and serology tests in a national electronic immunization registry (www.myvaccines.ch). Among 219 SOT candidates assessed between January 2014 and November 2015, 54 patients were transplanted during the study. Between listing and transplant, catch-up immunizations increased the patients' immunity from 70% to 87% (hepatitis A virus, P = .008), from 22% to 41% (hepatitis B virus, P = .008), from 77% to 91% (tetanus, P = .03), and from 78% to 98% (Streptococcus pneumoniae, P = .002). Their immunity at transplant was significantly higher against S. pneumoniae (P = .006) and slightly higher against hepatitis A virus (P = .07), but not against hepatitis B virus, than that of 65 SOT recipients transplanted in 2013. This demonstrates the value of a systematic multimodal serology-based approach of immunizations of SOT candidates at listing and the need for optimized strategies to increase their hepatitis B virus vaccine responses.

Immunization of Solid Organ Transplant Candidates and Recipients: A 2018 Update

This article discusses the recommended vaccines used before and after solid organ transplant period, including data regarding vaccine safety and efficacy and travel-related vaccines. Vaccination is an important part of the preparation for solid organ transplantation, because vaccine-preventable diseases contribute to the morbidity and mortality of these patients. A pretransplantation protocol should be encouraged in every transplant center. The main goal of vaccination is to provide seroprotection before transplantation, because iatrogenically immunosuppressed patients posttransplant have a lower seroresponse to vaccines.

Vaccines in pediatric transplant recipients-Past, present, and future

Infections significantly impact outcomes for solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children. Vaccine-preventable diseases contribute to morbidity and mortality in both early and late posttransplant time periods. Several infectious diseases and transplantation societies have published recommendations and guidelines that address immunization in adult and pediatric transplant recipients. In many cases, pediatric-specific studies are limited in size or quality, leading to recommendations being based on adult data or mixed adult-pediatric studies. We therefore review the current state of evidence for selected immunizations in pediatric transplant recipients and highlight areas for future investigation. Specific attention is given to studies that enrolled only children.

Pneumococcal vaccination in adult solid organ transplant recipients: A review of current evidence

This narrative review summarizes the current literature relating to pneumococcal vaccination in adult solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, who are at risk of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) with its attendant high morbidity and mortality. The effect of the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine has been examined in several small cohort studies in SOT recipients, most of which were kidney transplant recipients. The outcomes for these studies have been laboratory seroresponses or functional antibody titers. Overall, in most of these studies the transplant recipients were capable of generating measurable serological responses to pneumococcal vaccination but these responses were less than those of healthy controls. A mathematical model estimated the effectiveness of polysaccharide vaccination in SOT recipients to be one third less than those of patients with HIV. The evidence for the efficacy of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in SOT is based on a small number of randomized controlled trials in liver and kidney transplant recipients. These trials demonstrated that SOT recipients mounted a serological response following vaccination however there was no benefit to the use of prime boosting (conjugate vaccine followed by polysaccharide vaccine). Currently there are no randomized studies investigating the clinical protection rate against IPD after pneumococcal vaccination by either vaccine type or linked to vaccine titers or other responses against pneumococcus. Concerns that vaccination may increase the risk of adverse alloresponses such as rejection and generation of donor specific antibodies are not supported by studies examining this aspect of vaccine safety. Pneumococcal vaccination is a potentially important strategy to reduce IPD in SOT recipients and is associated with excellent safety. Current international recommendations are based on expert opinion from conflicting data, hence there is a clear need for further high-quality studies in this high-risk population examining optimal vaccination regimens. Such studies should focus on strategies to optimize functional immune responses.

Invasive pneumococcal infections in pediatric liver-small bowel-pancreas transplant recipients

Children undergoing LSBPTx are at increased risk of IPI due to splenectomy. We aimed to describe the clinical features and outcomes of IPI in pediatric LSBPTx recipients. Between 2008 and 2016, 122 LSBPTx children at our center were retrospectively reviewed. Nine patients had 12 episodes of IPI; the median age at first infection was 3.5 years (range: 1.5-7.1 years). The median time from transplant to first infection was 3 years (range: 0.8-5.8 years). Clinical presentation included as follows: pneumonia (n = 1), bacteremia/sepsis (n = 7), pneumonia with sepsis (n = 1), meningitis with sepsis (n = 2), pneumonia and meningitis with sepsis (n = 1). The overall risk for IPI was 7.4% or 0.9% per year. The mortality rate was 22%. Seven (78%) children had received at least one dose of PCV13, four (44%) patients had received 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine prior to IPI. All patients were on oral penicillin prophylaxis. In conclusion, despite partial or complete pneumococcal immunization and reported antimicrobial prophylaxis, IPI in LSBPTx children can have a fatal outcome. Routine monitoring of pneumococcal serotype antibodies to determine the timing for revaccination might be warranted to ensure protective immunity in these transplant recipients.

Seroresponses and safety of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccination in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Conjugated pneumococcal vaccine is recommended for kidney transplant recipients, however, their immunogenicity and potential to trigger allograft rejection though generation of de novo anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies has not been well studied.

METHODS

Clinically stable kidney transplant recipients participated in a prospective cohort study and received a single dose of 13-valent conjugate pneumococcal vaccine. Anti-pneumococcal IgG was measured for the 13 vaccine serotypes pre and post vaccination and functional anti-pneumococcal IgG for 4 serotypes post vaccination. Anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies antibodies were measured before and after vaccination. Kidney transplant recipients were followed clinically for 12 months for episodes of allograft rejection or invasive pneumococcal disease.

RESULTS

Forty-five kidney transplant recipients participated. Median days between pre and post vaccination serology was 27 (range 21-59). Post vaccination, there was a median 1.1 to 1.7-fold increase in anti-pneumococcal IgG antibody concentrations for all 13 serotypes. Kidney transplant recipients displayed a functional antibody titer ≥1:8 for a median of 3 of the 4 serotypes. Post vaccination, there were no de novo anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies, no episodes of biopsy proven rejection or invasive pneumococcal disease.

CONCLUSION

A single dose of 13-valent conjugate pneumococcal vaccine elicits increased titers and breadth of functional anti-pneumococcal antibodies in kidney transplant recipients without stimulating rejection or donor-specific antibodies.

Discrepant serological assays for Pneumococcus in renal transplant recipients - a prospective study

Vaccine immunoprotection for Streptococcus pneumoniae is mediated by opsonizing antibodies targeting serotype-specific capsular polysaccharides. Quantitative antibody levels enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and antibody-mediated opsonophagocytic assays (OPA) measure vaccine-induced protection; correlation of these assays in transplantation requires investigation. This study examines the laboratory assessment of antibody titers in vaccinated renal recipients. Streptococcus pneumoniae 19A is common in immunocompromised hosts and is represented in protein-conjugate vaccines (PCV) and polysaccharide vaccines (PSV). Antibodies to 19A in serial sera from 30 vaccinated renal transplant recipients were compared using ELISA and OPA assays. Subject titers were classified as protected or not by ELISA (>0.35 μg/ml) and OPA titer (>1:8). Antibody titers analyzed using McNemar's test indicate that protection measured by the two assays are not the same (P = 0.0078); simple linear regression of within-subject geometric means of 19A enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) antibody levels versus 19A opsonophagocytic assays (OPA) titers demonstrates significant correlation between the two assays (P < 0.001). Vaccination is increasingly important given increasing antimicrobial resistance worldwide. OPA and ELISA antibody assays do not correlate well using current values for protective immunity against the Pneumococcus in immunosuppressed transplant recipients. Future studies of vaccination in transplant recipients should evaluate protective antibody levels using both functional antibody assays and standard ELISA antibody titers. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00307125).

CONDITION OF ANTI-MEASLES IMMUNITY IN PATIENTS ON WAITING-LIST FOR LUNG TRANSPLANTATION

Aim. Determination of intensity of immunity against measles in patients on waiting-list for lung transplantation. Materials and methods. IgG levels against measles virus were studied in blood sera of 80 adult patients (mean age 35.8± 11.4 years) on waiting-list of lung transplantation, without history of this disease. Determination of IgG levels against measles virus was carried out by ELISA using a standard kit from «Vektor-Best» (VectoMeasles-IgG). Results. Protective level of IgG against measles virus (above 0.18 I U/ml) was registered in 83.3% of examined patients. Mean level of anti-measles antibodies was within protective values - 1.53 IU/ml (95% confidence interval 1.17 - 1.89). Medium level of anti-measles antibodies (1 - 5 IU/ml) was registered in most of the analyzed samples (55.2%). A positive correlation between values of antibodies and age of patients (r=0.43) was detected. Dependence between levels of antibodies and previously executed hormonal and cytostatic therapy was not detected. Conclusion. Patients on waiting-list of solid organ transplantation are a group of risk for development of severe course of measles infection, that dictates the necessity of execution of vaccination at short terms before or after registration on the waiting-list.

Vaccination strategies in patients with solid organ transplant: evidences and future perspectives

Solid organ transplant recipients need emphases on immunization that result in certainly decrease the risk of vaccine preventable diseases. Organ transplant candidate should complete the recommended full vaccination schedule as early as possible during the courses of underlying disease because the patients with end stage liver or renal disease have reduced immune response to vaccine. Furthermore, live attenuated vaccines are generally contraindicated after transplantation. This review summarizes current information and the evidences regarding the efficacy and safety of immunization in adult solid organ transplant candidates and recipients.

Pneumococcal disease in adult solid organ transplantation recipients

In solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, Streptococcus pneumoniae can cause substantial morbidity and mortality ranging from non-invasive to invasive diseases, including pneumonia, bacteremia, and meningitis, with a risk of invasive pneumococcal disease 12 times higher than that observed in non-immunocompromised patients. Moreover, pneumococcal infection has been related to graft dysfunction. Several factors have been involved in the risk of pneumococcal disease in SOT recipients, such as type of transplant, time since transplantation, influenza activity, and nasopharyngeal colonization. Pneumococcal vaccination is recommended for all SOT recipients with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharides vaccine. Although immunological rate response is appropriate, it is lower than in the rest of the population, decreases with time, and its clinical efficacy is variable. Booster strategy with 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine has not shown benefit in this population. Despite its relevance, there are few studies focused on invasive pneumococcal disease in SOT recipients. Further studies addressing clinical, microbiological, and epidemiological data of pneumococcal disease in the transplant setting as well as new strategies for improving the protection of SOT recipients are warranted.

Travel risk assessment, advice and vaccinations in immunocompromised travellers (HIV, solid organ transplant and haematopoeitic stem cell transplant recipients): A review

International travellers with immunocompromising conditions such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, solid organ transplantation (SOT) and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are at a significant risk of travel-related illnesses from both communicable and non-communicable diseases, depending on the intensity of underlying immune dysfunction, travel destinations and activities. In addition, the choice of travel vaccinations, timing and protective antibody responses are also highly dependent on the underlying conditions and thus pose significant challenges to the health-care providers who are involved in pre-travel risk assessment. This review article provides a framework of understanding and approach to aforementioned groups of immunocompromised travellers regarding pre-travel risk assessment and management; in particular travel vaccinations, infectious and non-infectious disease risks and provision of condition-specific advice; to reduce travel-related mortality and morbidity.

Pneumococcal vaccine and patients with pulmonary diseases

Chronic pulmonary diseases are chronic diseases that affect the airways and lung parenchyma. Examples of common chronic pulmonary diseases include asthma, bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive lung disease, lung fibrosis, sarcoidosis, pulmonary hypertension, and cor pulmonale. Pulmonary infection is considered a significant cause of mortality in patients with chronic pulmonary diseases. Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading isolated bacteria from adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia, the most common pulmonary infection. Vaccination against S. pneumoniae can reduce the risk of mortality, especially from more serious infections in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. Patients with chronic pulmonary diseases who take steroids or immunomodulating therapy (eg, methotrexate, anti-tumor necrosis factor inhibitors), or who have concurrent sickle cell disease or other hemoglobinopathies, primary immunodeficiency disorders, human immunodeficiency virus infection/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, nephrotic syndrome, and hematologic or solid malignancies should be vaccinated with both 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine 23-valent.

Vaccination of the immunocompromised child

The development of vaccination is a major achievement in modern medicine. However, children treated with immunosuppression may not at all, or only in part, receive routine immunization due to uncertainty of its risks and effect. There is a substantial lack of pediatric studies concerning the efficacy and safety of vaccination in this patient group. Experience from similar adult groups and children with HIV infection can be used as a model for other disease categories. With increasing knowledge of the immunologic basis of vaccination and how immunosuppressive drugs interfere with the immune system, improved vaccines could be tailored, and adequate, individualized guidelines issued.

Pneumococcal immunization in immunocompromised hosts: where do we stand?

Immunocompromised patients are all at risk of invasive pneumococcal disease, of different degrees and timings. However, considerable progress in pneumococcal immunization over the last 30 years should benefit these patients. The 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine has been widely evaluated in these populations, but due to its low immunogenicity, its efficacy is sub-optimal, or even low. The principle of the conjugate vaccine is that, through the protein conjugation with the polysaccharide, the vaccine becomes more immunogenic, T-cell dependent, and thus providing a better early response and a boost effect. The 7-valent conjugate vaccine has been the first one to be evaluated in different immunocompromised populations. We review here the efficacy and safety of the different antipneumococcal vaccines in cancer, transplant and HIV-positive patients and propose a critical appraisal of the current guidelines.

2013 IDSA clinical practice guideline for vaccination of the immunocompromised host

An international panel of experts prepared an evidenced-based guideline for vaccination of immunocompromised adults and children. These guidelines are intended for use by primary care and subspecialty providers who care for immunocompromised patients. Evidence was often limited. Areas that warrant future investigation are highlighted.

How effective is vaccination in preventing pneumococcal disease?

Vaccination with a preparation that currently contains 23 pneumococcal capsular polysaccharides (PPV23) successfully reduces the risk of serious pneumococcal infection by an estimated 50% to 80%. Because infants and young children do not respond to polysaccharide antigens, a conjugated polysaccharide vaccine that first contained 7 capsule types (PCV7) and now contains 13 capsule types (PCV13) was developed for use in them. A single study in patients with AIDS showed protection against pneumococcal disease by PCV13, but not after PPV23. Based on these observations, the CDC has now recommended that immunocompromized adults receive PCV13 followed 8 weeks later by PPV23.

Serologic vaccination response after solid organ transplantation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Infectious diseases after solid organ transplantation (SOT) are one of the major complications in transplantation medicine. Vaccination-based prevention is desirable, but data on the response to active vaccination after SOT are conflicting.

METHODS

In this systematic review, we identify the serologic response rate of SOT recipients to post-transplantation vaccination against tetanus, diphtheria, polio, hepatitis A and B, influenza, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitides, tick-borne encephalitis, rabies, varicella, mumps, measles, and rubella.

RESULTS

Of the 2478 papers initially identified, 72 were included in the final review. The most important findings are that (1) most clinical trials conducted and published over more than 30 years have all been small and highly heterogeneous regarding trial design, patient cohorts selected, patient inclusion criteria, dosing and vaccination schemes, follow up periods and outcomes assessed, (2) the individual vaccines investigated have been studied predominately only in one group of SOT recipients, i.e. tetanus, diphtheria and polio in RTX recipients, hepatitis A exclusively in adult LTX recipients and mumps, measles and rubella in paediatric LTX recipients, (3) SOT recipients mount an immune response which is for most vaccines lower than in healthy controls. The degree to which this response is impaired varies with the type of vaccine, age and organ transplanted and (4) for some vaccines antibodies decline rapidly.

CONCLUSION

Vaccine-based prevention of infectious diseases is far from satisfactory in SOT recipients. Despite the large number of vaccination studies preformed over the past decades, knowledge on vaccination response is still limited. Even though the protection, which can be achieved in SOT recipients through vaccination, appears encouraging on the basis of available data, current vaccination guidelines and recommendations for post-SOT recipients remain poorly supported by evidence. There is an urgent need to conduct appropriately powered vaccination trials in well-defined SOT recipient cohorts.

Randomized, single blind, controlled trial to evaluate the prime-boost strategy for pneumococcal vaccination in renal transplant recipients

Renal transplant recipients are at increased risk of developing invasive pneumococcal diseases but may have poor response to the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV). It may be possible to enhance immunogenicity by priming with 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (7vPnC) and boosting with PPV 1 year later. In a randomized single-blind, controlled study, adult recipients of renal transplants received either 7nPVC or PPV followed by PPV 1 year later. The vaccine response was defined as 2-fold increase in antibody concentration from baseline and an absolute post-vaccination values ≥1 µg/ml. The primary endpoint was vaccine response of the primed group (7vPnC/PPV) compared with single PPV vaccination. Antibody concentrations for 10 serotypes were measured at baseline, 8 weeks after first vaccination, before second vaccination, and 8 weeks after second vaccination. Of 320 screened patients, 80 patients were randomized and 62 completed the study. Revaccination with PPV achieved no significant increase of immune response in the 7vPnC/PPV group compared with the single PPV recipients A response to at least 1 serotype was seen in 77.1% of patients who received 7vPnC and 93.1% of patients who received PPV (P = 0.046). After second vaccination response to at least 1 serotype was seen in 87.5% patients of 7vPnC/PPV group and 87.1% patients of PPV group (non significant p). The median number of serotypes eliciting a response was 3.5 (95% CI 2.5–4.5) in the 7vPnC/PPV group versus 5 (95% CI 3.9–6.1) in the PPV group (non-significant p). Immunogenicity of pneumococcal vaccination was not enhanced by the prime–boost strategy compared with vaccination with PPV alone. Administration of a single dose of PPV should continue to be the standard of care for adult recipients of renal transplants.

Trial Registration

EudraCT 2007-004590-25.

Infections in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Infectious complications are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in children undergoing solid organ transplantation. Knowledge gained over the last 30 years provides a growing understanding of these infections. This review identifies risk factors for and timing of infections describes the common infectious syndromes and pathogens seen in children undergoing solid organ transplantation, and reviews preventive strategies.

Immunogenicity of a combined schedule of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine followed by a 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine in adult recipients of heart or lung transplants

A combined schedule of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) followed by 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) was evaluated retrospectively in 26 adult recipients of heart or lung transplants. PCV7 was immunogenic in these patients but there appeared to be no benefit from the additional PPV23 dose.

Maintenance immunosuppressive therapy with everolimus preserves humoral immune responses

While the guidelines for vaccination in renal transplant recipients recommend the use of pneumococcal polysaccharide (PPS) and tetanus toxoid (TT), their efficacy in immunocompromised renal transplant recipients is not known. Here we tested the effect of everolimus on immune responses after vaccination by measuring the capacity of 36 stable renal transplant recipients to mount cellular and humoral responses after vaccination. Twelve patients in each treatment arm received immunosuppressive therapy consisting of prednisolone (P) plus cyclosporine (CsA), mycophenolate sodium (MPA), or everolimus. Patients were vaccinated with the T-cell-dependent antigens immunocyanin and TT, and the T-cell-independent PPS. Treatment with CsA partially inhibited and MPA completely abolished the capacity to mount a primary humoral response, whereas everolimus left this largely intact. Recall responses were inhibited by MPA only. All drug combinations inhibited cellular responses against TT. In patients treated with MPA, B-cell numbers were severely reduced. Thus, combined with P, treatment with MPA completely disturbed primary and secondary humoral responses. Everolimus or CsA allowed the boosting of T-cell-dependent and -independent secondary humoral responses. Treatment with everolimus allowed a primary response.

Infections in pediatric transplant recipients: not just small adults

Transplantation increasingly is being used as treatment for children with end-stage organ diseases, hematopoietic rescue from therapy used to treat malignancies, and as cure for primary immune deficiencies. This article reviews some of the major concepts regarding infections that complicate pediatric transplantation, highlighting differences in epidemiology, evaluation, treatment and prevention for children compared with adult recipients.

Primary care of the transplant patient

A total of 153,245 patients are living with a solid organ transplant in the US. In addition, patients are experiencing high 5-year survival rates after transplantation. Thus, primary care physicians will be caring for transplanted patients. The aim of this review is to update primary care physicians on chronic diseases, screening for malignancy, immunizations, and contraception in the transplant patient. Several studies on the treatment of hypertension and hyperlipidemia demonstrate that most agents used to treat the general population also can be used to treat transplant recipients. Little information exists on the medical management of diabetes in the transplant population, but experts in the area believe that the treatment of diabetes should be similar. Transplant recipients are at increased risk for all malignancies. Aggressive screening should be employed for all cancers with a proven screening benefit. Killed immunizations are safe for the transplant population, but live virus vaccines should be avoided. Women of childbearing age should be counseled about the impact of immunosuppressants on the efficacy and side effects of contraception.

[Vaccination against Streptococcus pneumoniae in solid organ transplant recipients]

The risk of developing invasive pneumococcal disease in transplant patients is estimated at 28 to 36 per 1000 patients/year according to the type of organ transplanted. This rate is much higher than the estimated incidence in the general population. This study reviews the current experience regarding the different types of vaccinations against Streptococcus pneumoniae in transplant patients, the immunogenic response to pneumococcal vaccine in these patients, the clinical experience to date with the use of pneumococcal vaccines, and the utility of a sequential vaccination regime including the heptavalent vaccine and vaccine for the 23 serogroups. The immunogenicity produced by pneumococcal vaccines in transplant patients is lower and not as long-lasting as in immunocompetent individuals, and the revaccination regimen inducing the most favorable immunological response is unknown. Nonetheless, pneumococcal vaccination provides clear benefits to transplant recipients and should be given before transplantation whenever possible.

Response to booster hepatitis B vaccines in liver-transplanted children primarily vaccinated in infancy

BACKGROUND

A hepatitis B virus (HBV) universal vaccination program for infants was implemented for 24 years in Taiwan. Most of the children who received organ transplantation were primarily vaccinated before transplantation. This study investigated the efficacy of HBV vaccination and booster responses in children after liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

Totally 31 children were enrolled. They were clinically stable for more than 1 year after LT. Twenty of them kept a titer of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) more than 10 mIU/mL and received no booster, while 11 received one booster because their anti-HBs titers were less than 10 mIU/mL. Cellular immunity was checked by enzyme-linked immunospot assay with interferon-gamma surrogated for T-helper 1 cells and interleukin-5 for T-helper 2 before and after booster vaccine.

RESULTS

One of the non-boosters had de novo HBV infection after LT and recovered to be anti-HBs positive. The first booster restored an adequate titer in 64% (7/11) of those with anti-HBs titer less than 10 mIU/mL after LT. The four patients who failed the first booster responded well to the second dose. After the booster, the mononuclear cells of all 11 had more than one spot-forming cell for interferon-gamma or interleukin-5. Transplanted girls maintained a higher antibody titer than boys.

CONCLUSION

Primary HBV vaccination or the booster dose(s) of HBV vaccine could provide adequate humoral and cellular immunity in children with LT.

Vaccination of the solid organ transplant recipient

Active immunization is the most important way to protect immunocompromised patients from vaccine-preventable infectious diseases. Although live vaccines are contraindicated for most immunocompromised patients, many inactivated or conjugate vaccines are safe and generally recommended. Some vaccines are known to be of suboptimal immunogenicity in transplant recipients. As a consequence, this may be associated with an impaired ability to mount protective immunity. Nevertheless, even partial protection has been shown to confer significant benefit to this vulnerable patient group. To increase efficacy in generating protective immunity, patients should complete the full complement of recommended vaccinations early in the course of disease before transplantation. This review summarizes the general recommendations for vaccinations of adult transplant recipients and candidates including special considerations for household contacts and health care workers.

Update on immunizations in solid organ transplant recipients: what clinicians need to know

Vaccine-preventable diseases remain a major source of morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. Since the publication of the American Society of Transplantation's guidelines for vaccination of solid organ transplant recipients in 2004 (1), several new vaccines have been licensed. Transplant clinicians have been inundated by questions from patients and colleagues regarding the utility and safety of these vaccines in transplant candidates and recipients. In addition, new data has appeared regarding utility of some established vaccines, lack of rejection after vaccination and newer adjuvant strategies. Literature published between 2004 and 2007 was reviewed in a Medline search. Guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices are reviewed and summarized, with particular attention to vaccines for human papillomavirus, varicella and varicella-zoster, tetanus-reduced diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) and hepatitis B, as well as conjugated meningococcal and conjugated pneumococcal vaccines. Although randomized controlled trials in transplant recipients have not been performed for most new licensed vaccines, preliminary recommendations can be formulated based on current data and guidelines. Further studies will be important to determine the indications and optimal timing of newer immunizations and immunization strategies.

The effect of sirolimus therapy on vaccine responses in transplant recipients

Different immunosuppressant regimens vary in their effects on antibody responses to vaccination. The combination of prednisolone and azathioprine has only a minor effect, whereas the addition of ciclosporin attenuates protective antibody responses to influenza vaccination. The effect of sirolimus, a new immunosuppressant, on vaccine responses has been little studied. Thirty-two hepatic or renal transplant patients randomized to calcineurin inhibitor-based or sirolimus-based immunosuppression were vaccinated against influenza and pneumococcus. Following tri-valent influenza vaccination, a similar rise in antibody titer occurred in sirolimus and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) treated patients, though sirolimus treated patients developed a 'protective' titer to more influenza antigens. The pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine was equally effective in both groups. Hence, vaccination guidelines in place for CNI treated patients are likely to be appropriate for transplant recipients maintained on sirolimus.

Invasive pneumococcal disease in solid organ transplant recipients--10-year prospective population surveillance

Prospective population-based surveillance to assess the incidence and impact of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in organ transplant patients is lacking. By using a population-based Invasive Bacterial Diseases Network surveillance program, we studied the incidence, clinical significance, serotypes and antimicrobial resistance pattern of IPD in a large cohort of adult transplant patients and the general population. Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates and patient data were collected prospectively from 1995 to 2004. We identified 21 cases of IPD (based on sterile-site isolates) in our organ transplant population over a 10-year period. This translated to an incidence rate of 146 infections per 100,000 persons per year. This compared to an incidence of 11.5 per 100,000 persons per year in the general population (R(R)=12.8; 95% CI 8.1-19.9, p<0.00001). If nonsterile-site isolates (respiratory tract) were included, the incidence rate in transplant patients was 419 of 100 000 persons per year. Serotypes 23F and 22F were most common, and 85.0% had a serotype included in the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine. The antimicrobial resistance rates were high, especially for penicillin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), but were not significantly different from the general population. Solid organ transplant recipients are at significantly greater risk for IPD than the general population. Preventative strategies are necessary.

Immunogenicity of pneumococcal vaccine in renal transplant recipients--three year follow-up of a randomized trial

Routine pneumococcal vaccination is recommended at regular intervals posttransplant. However, there is limited data on durability of vaccine response and the impact of vaccine type on antibody persistence. We determined the durability of response for patients enrolled in a randomized trial of conjugate (PCV7) versus polysaccharide (PPV23) pneumococcal vaccination. Response was defined as a twofold increase from baseline and a titer > or =0.35 microg/mL using a pneumococcal ELISA for seven serotypes (measured at 8 weeks and 3 years). Forty-seven patients were evaluated and had received either PPV23 (n = 24) or PCV7 (n = 23). Response rates and geometric mean titers varied by serotype but declined significantly at 3-years for 6 of 7 serotypes (p < 0.001). No significant difference in durability was found in patients that had received PPV23 versus PCV7. Compared to the 8-week response, 20.6% fewer patients had a response to at least one serotype by 3 years. The largest relative declines were seen for serotype 4 (response dropped from 40.4% at 8 weeks to 17.0% at 3 years) and serotype 9V (44.7% dropping to 21.3%). The only factor predictive of response durability was a strong multiserotype initial response (p < 0.001). In conclusion, vaccine responses decline significantly by 3 years and conjugate vaccine does not improve the durability of response.

Impaired anti-pneumococcal polysaccharide antibody production and invasive pneumococcal infection following heart transplantation

An increased risk of invasive pneumococcal infection has been described among adult heart transplant (HT) recipients. Vaccination has been recommended before HT but the appropriate time for revaccination is not known. In a preliminary analysis of a prospective study involving a cohort of 32 HT recipients receiving daclizumab and triple immunosuppresion therapy, a progressive decline in pneumococcal polysaccharide antibody (anti-PPS) levels was observed during the first year after HT. One of the patients who was found to have a decrease in the levels of anti-PPS developed severe pneumococcal meningitis 20 months after HT. Before HT he had received non-conjugated 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine and showed a normal post-immunization anti-PPS production. The data suggest that long-term immunologic monitoring might be useful to recognize impairment of antibody responses under immunosuppressive therapy in HT.

Immunization issues before and after solid organ transplantation in children

Solid-organ transplant recipients are at risk from various infectious diseases, many of which can be prevented by immunizations that could reduce morbidity and mortality. However, it is not uncommon for children requiring transplantation to have received inadequate or no immunizations pre-transplant. Every effort should be made to immunize transplant candidates early in the course of their disease according to recommended schedules prior to transplantation. It is also important to immunize their household contacts and healthcare workers. In this review, we summarize the major immunization issues for children undergoing transplantation, the data currently available on immunization safety and efficacy, and suggest immunization practices to reduce vaccine-preventable disease. There is a real need for a standardized approach to the administration and evaluation of immunizations in this group of patients.

Low Prevalence of Prior Streptococcus pneumoniae Vaccination Among Potential Lung Transplant Candidates

INTRODUCTION

Appropriate vaccination status in the pre-solid organ transplant period is critically important.

METHODS

To determine if lung transplant candidates are adequately vaccinated for Streptococcus pneumoniae, a cross-sectional study was performed. Electronic records of patients referred to our institution for transplantation evaluation between July 2002 and January 2004 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Only 98 of 157 patients (62.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 54.8 to 70.1%) evaluated for lung transplantation reported prior receipt of S pneumoniae vaccine. COPD was the only factor significantly associated with vaccination. Patients with COPD were more likely to have received vaccination compared to patients with other diagnoses (odds ratio, 4.66; 95% CI, 2.26 to 9.60).

CONCLUSIONS

S pneumoniae vaccination rates among potential lung transplant candidates fall substantially short of current recommendations for universal immunization. Transplant programs should thoroughly review vaccination status and develop strategies to ensure that candidates receive all appropriate vaccines before transplantation.

Bacterial and Mycobacterial Pneumonia in Transplant Recipients

Bacteria and myobacteria are important pulmonary pathogens in transplant recipients and are the focus of this article. Although considerable overlap exists, there are significant differences in the epidemiology and clinical presentation of these organisms in solid organ transplant (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. The first section of this article focuses on infections in SOT recipients (predominantly heart, liver, lung, and kidney transplant recipients), and the latter addresses these infections in HSCT recipients.

Recommendations for the use of the 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine in adults: a Belgian consensus report

A multidisciplinary expert panel, appointed by the High Council for Public Health, evaluated the scientific evidence on which the recommendations for the appropriate use of the pneumococcal vaccine was based and reviewed the studies that became available since previous reports. The conclusions of the working group, presented in this manuscript, resulted in an update of the Belgian recommendations for pneumococcal vaccination.

Safety and immunogenicity of the American Academy of Pediatrics--recommended sequential pneumococcal conjugate and polysaccharide vaccine schedule in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

Solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk for invasive pneumococcal disease. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends immunization with sequential pneumococcal vaccines for this group; however, data are lacking. Accordingly, this study was designed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the recommended regimen.

METHODS

Pediatric solid organ transplant recipients (n = 25) between 2 and 18 years of age who had not previously received 7-valent conjugate pneumococcal vaccine (PCV7) were enrolled. These patients received 2 doses of the PCV7 and a single dose of the 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (23V). Each vaccine dose was given 2 months apart. Healthy age-matched controls (n = 23) were enrolled for comparison. Controls received a single dose of PCV7 followed 2 months later by a single dose of 23V. Antibody concentrations to serotypes 1, 4, 5, 6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay prevaccination, 2 months after each vaccine dose and 5 to 7 months after 23V. Local and systemic reactions to each vaccine dose were recorded.

RESULTS

Systemic and injection-site reactions were comparable between the 2 groups. Significant rises in serotype-specific pneumococcal antibody geometric mean concentrations from prevaccination levels were observed in both groups; however, final antibody responses to serotypes 1, 4, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F were significantly lower in solid organ transplant recipients compared with the control group. Antibody concentrations did not increase significantly among solid organ transplant patients after the second dose of PCV7. No additional increase in PCV7-associated serotype-specific antibody levels was observed after the 23V dose in both groups. Heart transplant recipients had lower antibody responses compared with liver transplant recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the pneumococcal vaccine regimen was safe and immunogenic among pediatric solid organ transplant recipients, the patients did not seem to benefit from the second dose of PCV7 or from the 23V dose given 2 months later. Additional studies are needed to determine the number of PCV7 doses and the interval between PCV7 and 23V to induce optimal responses.

Invasive pneumococcal disease in pediatric organ transplant recipients: a high-risk population

There are few studies on invasive pneumococcal disease in pediatric transplant recipients. Given this fact plus the advent of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, we conducted a retrospective study at a major pediatric transplant center. The objectives were to determine the incidence and outcomes of invasive pneumococcal diseases in the patient population and to examine the timing of these infections after transplantation. We determined that invasive disease occurred at a rate that was significantly greater than the rate extrapolated from generally healthy children <5 yr of age (176 episodes per 100 000 children per year vs. 35-68.3 per 100 000 children per year). In addition, disease occurred at a median of approximately 20 months after transplantation, thereby theoretically allowing enough time for vaccination with the 7-valent conjugate vaccine. The study also documented significant missed vaccination opportunities.