Similar hematologic effects of long-term linezolid and vancomycin therapy in a prospective observational study of patients with orthopedic infections

Linezolid vs Vancomycin in Induced Thrombocytopenia

INTRODUCTION

Linezolid and vancomycin have an important place among therapeutic antimicrobial options for multidrug-resistant gram-positive infections. Thrombocytopenia is an adverse effect reported with both and can lead to treatment interruption. Our objective was to compare the incidence of thrombocytopenia in patients receiving linezolid or vancomycin and to identify risk factors associated with thrombocytopenia.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational cohort study that involved patients who received linezolid (intravenously or orally) or vancomycin (intravenously) at a tertiary care hospital, between January 2016 and October 2019, for a minimum of 5 days and in whom platelet values were measured during treatment. Data on platelet count were collected during therapy in each group to identify the incidence of thrombocytopenia.

RESULTS

A total of 453 patients fulfilled the study criteria; 241 patients received linezolid and 212 patients vancomycin. The main logistic regression analysis revealed that patients in the linezolid group had approximately a four times higher incidence of thrombocytopenia (OR 4.39; 95% CI 2.38-8.08) compared to vancomycin. An increased incidence of thrombocytopenia was associated with advanced age, baseline platelet count and vasopressor use.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians considering vancomycin or linezolid for a susceptible infection should weigh the higher risk of thrombocytopenia that may be observed with linezolid vs. vancomycin in their decision.

Comparison of linezolid step-down therapy to standard parenteral therapy in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections

Data supporting oral step-down therapy in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection (BSI) are sparse; linezolid offers potential in this setting. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of oral step-down linezolid compared with standard parenteral therapy (SPT) in MRSA-BSI. This was a retrospective cohort performed in adults receiving step-down/outpatient linezolid or SPT (vancomycin, daptomycin) for MRSA-BSI from 2011-2019. Primary outcome was 90-day infection-related re-admission (IRR) from clinical worsening/relapse or infection recurrence. 215 patients included (54 linezolid, 161 SPT). Infection sources were skin (34%), bone/joint (15%), endocarditis (13%), other (32%), multiple (6%). Patients receiving SPT more commonly had complicated bacteraemia (72% vs. 41%; P < 0.0001) and metastatic foci (45% vs. 20%; P = 0.001). 90-day IRR occurred in 17% and 26% of linezolid and SPT groups, respectively (P = 0.159). When accounting for disease severity, linezolid use was not independently associated with 90-day IRR (adjOR, 1.0, 95% CI 0.24-4.3; P = 0.986). There were no differences in all-cause 90-day mortality (4% vs. 6%, P = 0.487) or overall incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) (17% vs. 16%; P = 0.843) between the groups. More patients in the SPT group developed an AE requiring re-hospitalisation (12% vs. 2%; P = 0.024), most commonly line-related complications. Oral step-down linezolid demonstrated similar clinical and safety outcomes compared with SPT for MRSA-BSI, except linezolid was associated with fewer AEs requiring re-hospitalisation. Additional research is needed exploring step-down linezolid in MRSA-BSI, particularly in patients requiring shorter durations of outpatient therapy.

Vancomycin-induced thrombocytopenia in endocarditis: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Thrombocytopenia is a serious complication in the medical practice of numerous drugs. Vancomycin is frequently used for the prophylaxis and treatment of suspected or identified methicillin-resistant positive infections. Several cases with vancomycin-induced thrombocytopenia (VIT) have been reported. However, these have rarely been extensively reviewed. The present report describes a case of VIT in endocarditis, and reviews all VIT cases reported in the literature.

CASE SUMMARY

A 26-year-old male diagnosed with infective endocarditis was admitted. The patient was treated with multiple drugs, including vancomycin, which was initially intravenously given at 1000 mg every 12 h and subsequently at 500 mg every 8 h on day 3. On day 11, the platelet count decreased to 51 × 10⁹/L, vancomycin was switched to 500 mg every 12 h, and platelet transfusion was given. On day 17, the platelet count dropped to 27 × 10⁹/L, and platelet transfusion was administered again. On day 23, vancomycin was adjusted to 500 mg every 8 h as the trough concentration dropped to the minimum effective concentration. On day 33, the platelet count declined to approximately 40 × 10⁹/L. After platelet transfusion, the platelet count rebounded to 90 × 10⁹/L on day 35 but dropped again to 42 × 10⁹/L on day 43. Based on the time-to-platelet count curve and Naranjo’s Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale score, VIT was suspected. After vancomycin discontinuation and platelet transfusion, the platelet count gradually normalized.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of VIT can be achieved through the time-to-platelet count curve and Naranjo’s Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale score. The platelet count cannot be normalized simply by platelet transfusion alone, and vancomycin discontinuation is essential.

Reversible myelosuppression suspected to be secondary to linezolid in a cat with infected subcutaneous ureteral bypass systems

CASE SUMMARY

A 5-year-old castrated male domestic shorthair cat was presented for a multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium urinary tract infection within its bilateral subcutaneous ureteral bypass systems. After considerable consultation, the cat was treated with oral linezolid (10 mg/kg q12h) for two separate 2-week courses over 5 weeks. Over this time period, the cat became progressively neutropenic and thrombocytopenic, but was otherwise clinically stable. Upon cessation of the linezolid, the bicytopenia resolved within 12 days.

RELEVANCE AND NOVEL INFORMATION

The reversible myelosuppression in this case is suspected to be secondary to linezolid administration. While previously reported in people, this effect has not been reported at therapeutic doses in veterinary species. This report demonstrates the potential for adverse drug reaction development in cats treated with prolonged linezolid therapy and highlights the need for extreme caution when utilizing linezolid in patients with renal insufficiency. Linezolid is the only drug currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat vancomycin-resistant enterococci infections in people; however, resistance to this antibiotic appears to be increasing. Multidrug-resistant organisms continue to be a real global public health threat in both human and veterinary medicine. Third-tier antibiotics should only be considered under extreme circumstances and after considerable consultation with a specialist. Please note that the authors of this manuscript followed American Veterinary Medical Association policies on stewardship and International Society for Companion Animal Infectious Diseases guidelines, and do not promote or encourage the use in daily practice.

Safety and Tolerability of More than Six Days of Tedizolid Treatment

Tedizolid has demonstrated its efficacy and safety in clinical trials; however, data concerning its tolerability in long-term treatments are scarce. The aim of the study was to assess the indications and to describe the long-term safety profile of tedizolid. A multicentric retrospective study of patients who received tedizolid for more than 6 days was conducted. Adverse events (AEs) were identified from patients' medical records and laboratory data. The World Health Organization causality categories were used to discern AEs that were probably associated with tedizolid. Eighty-one patients, treated with tedizolid 200 mg once daily for a median (interquartile range [IQR]) duration of 28 (14 to 59) days, were included; 36 (44.4%) had previously received linezolid. The most common reasons for selecting tedizolid were to avoid linezolid potential toxicities or interactions (53.1%) or due to previous linezolid-related toxicities (27.2%). The most common indications were off-label, including prosthetic joint infections, osteomyelitis, and respiratory infections (77.8%). Overall, 9/81 patients (11.1%) experienced a probably associated AE. Two patients (2.5%) developed gastrointestinal disorders, 1 (1.2%) developed anemia, and 6 developed thrombocytopenia (7.4%) after a median (IQR) duration of treatment of 26.5 (17 to 58.5) days. Four (5%) patients discontinued tedizolid due to AEs. Among 23 patients with chronic renal failure (CRF), the rate of myelotoxicity was 17.4%, and only 8.7% had to stop tedizolid; 20 out of 22 with previous linezolid-associated toxicity had no AE. Long-term tedizolid treatments had good tolerance with rates of gastrointestinal AE and hematological toxicity lower than those reported with linezolid, particularly in patients with CRF and in those with a history of linezolid-associated toxicity.

Linezolid in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) is increasingly common and is sometimes treated with off-label use of linezolid. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with PJI caused by CoNS treated with surgical intervention and orally administrated linezolid during the period 1995-2014 (n = 28). Clinical outcomes and adverse events related to linezolid administration were evaluated. Mean time to follow-up was 4.3 years (range: 0.2-12). Results: Twenty-two of 28 patients were infection-free at follow-up. No CoNS strain was resistant to vancomycin, but 16 of 28 were resistant to rifampicin, 23 of 28 to clindamycin and 20 of 27 to quinolones. The mean duration of linezolid treatment was 4.2 weeks (range: 1-12). Eleven of 28 patients had an adverse event related to the antimicrobial treatment, and four had to discontinue linezolid, but all adverse events were reversible within 2 months after discontinuation. Conclusions: Oral linezolid administration combined with adequate surgical treatment may be useful for the treatment of PJIs caused by CoNS.

Real-Life Frequency of New-Onset Thrombocytopenia during Linezolid Treatment

BACKGROUND

Thrombocytopenia is a well-recognized adverse effect of linezolid; however, the frequency of this adverse effect during therapy has been variable across previous studies, and the associated risk factors are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the real-life frequency of new-onset thrombocytopenia due to linezolid and to determine the associated risk factors.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted among consecutive inpatients at a tertiary care hospital who received linezolid for a minimum of 5 days between January 2013 and August 2017. Data were extracted from electronic medical records obtained from a hospital database. Thrombocytopenia was defined as platelet count less than 100 × 10⁹/L or a 50% reduction from baseline (i.e., before linezolid initiation). Risk factors were identified by comparing the characteristics of patients who experienced the adverse effect during linezolid therapy with those of patients who did not experience the adverse effect. Continuous data were analyzed with the t test and categorical data with the χ² test.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients were included (38 women, 64 men; overall mean age 50 years, standard deviation [SD] 21). The mean duration of linezolid therapy was 14 (SD 10) days. Thrombocytopenia occurred in 18 patients (17.6%). Risk factors for the development of thrombocytopenia included mean duration of therapy (22 [SD 18] days versus 12 [SD 7] days; p = 0.023), renal replacement therapy (17% versus 4%; p = 0.032), renal impairment (61% versus 32%; p = 0.021), and concomitant administration of unfractionated heparin (50% versus 21%; p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The real-life frequency of new-onset of thrombocytopenia in patients receiving linezolid for a minimum of 5 days was 17.6%. Risk factors for linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia included prolonged duration of therapy, renal impairment, and concomitant unfractionated heparin.

Risk factors for linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia in patients without haemato-oncologic diseases

This study aimed to describe the occurrence and to evaluate the predictive factors of thrombocytopenia caused by parenteral linezolid in hospitalised patients without haemato-oncologic diseases. Using electronic medical records, a retrospective safety evaluation was performed among all hospitalised adult patients who received parenteral linezolid therapy between January 2005 and June 2016. Of all identified 264 patients with an average age of 63.4 (SD 15.8) years, thrombocytopenia occurred at a rate of 29.2% after an average of 11.2 (SD 7.4) days of the initiation of linezolid therapy. Significant predictive factors for thrombocytopenia included the duration of linezolid therapy longer than or equal to 7 days (adjusted odds ratios [ORs] 7.25, 19.51 and 28.80; 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 1.92-27.38, 4.76-79.95 and 6.48-127.92 for 7-13 days, 14-20 days and ≥21 days, respectively; P < 0.01 for all values), baseline platelet count <150 × 10³ /mm³ (adjusted OR, 5.08; 95% CI, 2.06-12.55; P < 0.001), creatinine clearance <30 mL/min (adjusted OR, 4.19; 95% CI, 1.59-11.06; P = 0.004) and concurrent low-dose aspirin therapy (adjusted OR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.26-7.08; P = 0.013). Baseline platelet count less than 150 × 10³ /mm³ was an independent predictor of early-onset (≤6 days) thrombocytopenia (adjusted OR, 5.07; 95% CI, 1.46-17.58; P = 0.011). Closer monitoring of platelet count is required in patients who receive parenteral linezolid therapy for 7 days or more, and have low baseline platelet counts or impaired renal function.

Linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia increases mortality risk in intensive care unit patients, a 10 year retrospective study

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia is one of the many confounding conditions in critically ill patients. It is rare but prognostic importance of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia in ICU population has not been well investigated. The study is to assess the incidence and risk factors of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia in ICU patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study with ICU patients treated with linezolid between January 2005 and December 2015 at the adult medical, surgical, emergency, and neurological ICUs at 1500-bed tertiary university medical center.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

There were 60 patients (mean age: 69.8 ± 11.9), 29 (48.3%) who developed linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia determined by the Naranjo algorithm on a case-by-case basis during the study period. The patients with linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia had a higher rate of any malignancy (41.4% vs 9.7%, P = 0.007), elevated baseline creatinine levels (median [interquartile range; IQR]: 1.7 mg/dL [0.9-2.5] vs 0.9 mg/dL [0.6-1.3]; P = 0.042), and lower baseline platelet counts (median [IQR] 160 × 10⁹ /L [128-230] vs 194 × 10⁹ /L [118-285]; P = 0.296) than patients without linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia. The patients who developed thrombocytopenia received more platelet transfusions (34.5% vs 6.5%, P = 0.009) and had higher ICU mortality rates (62.1% vs 32.3%, P = 0.037). Logistic regression analysis revealed the following significant risk factors for linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia: presence of any malignancy (odds ratio; OR [95% confidence interval; CI]: 8.667 [1.986-37.831]) and an elevated baseline serum creatinine level (OR: 1.673, CI: 1.046-2.675]).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Critically ill patients with any malignancy or an elevated baseline creatinine level who were treated with linezolid in the ICU were more likely to develop thrombocytopenia. More importantly, mortality increased with patients who developed linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia compared to those did not.

Vancomycin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Narrative Review

Thrombocytopenia has been reported as an adverse reaction of numerous drugs. Vancomycin is often overlooked as a culprit but has been associated with several cases of thrombocytopenia that were not well described in the literature. A literature search was conducted to find reports of thrombocytopenia induced by vancomycin. Biomedical databases including 'PubMed', 'Scopus', and 'Web of Science' were searched using terms 'vancomycin', 'platelet', 'pancytopenia', 'thrombocytopenia', and 'bleeding'. English language articles published before July 2015 were included. Thirty-nine papers including 29 case reports (30 cases), five observational studies, two clinical trials, two letters, and one case series remained for final analysis. The main route of administration was intravenous infusion. This adverse reaction seems to be duration dependent with the mean time to platelet nadir count of 8 days in reported cases. The interval may be significantly shorter in re-exposure to the drug. Platelet nadir counts ranged from 2000 to 100,000/mL in patients who experienced bleeding. Vancomycin-specific antibodies were detected in 13 of 17 patients who were tested in the case reports. Based on the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale, reaction was 'definite', 'probable', and 'possible' in 1, 15, and 14 patients, respectively. Among 30 cases, vancomycin was discontinued in 29 patients and platelets returned to normal counts within 5-6 days in 17 of them; in one patient, vancomycin was not discontinued, but platelet count recovered 11 days after the nadir time. Transfusion might be recommended if severe thrombocytopenia and bleeding occurs. Intravenous immunoglobulins, corticosteroids, rituximab, and plasma exchange should be reserved for patients with resistant thrombocytopenia and severe bleeding as mentioned in a number of reports.

Drug-induced immune-mediated thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit

A 62-year-old woman with prosthetic mitral valve was admitted for explant of an infected prosthetic knee. Perioperatively, she was bridged with heparin and started on empiric vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam. Platelet counts dropped precipitously within 2 days reaching a nadir of 6000/μL, without any bleeding. Decline persisted despite substituting heparin with bivalirudin. Antiplatelet factor 4 and anti-PLA1 antigen were negative. Schistocytes were absent. Antibiotics were substituted with daptomycin for suspected drug-induced thrombocytopenia. Pulse dose of intravenous immunoglobulin was initiated with rapid normalization of platelet count. She tested positive for IgG antiplatelet antibodies to vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam thereby confirming the diagnosis. Drug-induced immune-mediated thrombocytopenia is an underrecognized cause of thrombocytopenia in the intensive care units. Clinicians should be cognizant of this entity, and a definitive diagnosis should be sought if feasible.

Thrombocytopenia Associated with Linezolid Therapy in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Linezolid is associated infrequently with bone marrow suppression in immunocompetent patients, but hematologic complications from linezolid in transplant recipients are understudied. This study evaluated the hematologic safety of linezolid in solid organ transplant recipients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of inpatients at our institution treated with linezolid from June 1, 2009 until June 6, 2012. The solid organ transplant cohort (TP) was compared with the non-transplant cohort (NTP) using parameters related to linezolid safety. Outcomes included incidences of leukopenia or thrombocytopenia at the end of linezolid treatment (EOT), lengths of stay, and blood product requirements.

RESULTS

The TP cohort included 110 patients; the NTP cohort included 583 patients. Baseline parameters were similar between the TP and NTP cohorts. Non-transplant patients were more likely to have methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), whereas TP patients received more doses of linezolid (17.0 vs. 11.3, p<0.001) and were more likely to receive other drugs associated with thrombocytopenia (91.7% vs. 11.3%, p<0.0001). Transplant patients with normal platelet counts at baseline were more likely to have EOT thrombocytopenia (29.3% vs. 10.7%, p=0.005), and multivariable regression analysis confirmed only a beginning platelet count less than 150,000 platelets per micoliter to be significantly different between groups: 43% TP versus 26.9% NTP (p=0.0009) making it the only independent predictor of EOT thrombocytopenia. Finally, TP patients were more likely to require platelet transfusions compared with the NTP cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Transplant patients who received linezolid had a higher incidence of EOT thrombocytopenia and platelet transfusions, compared with NTP. Transplant patients who are thrombocytopenic at baseline are at the greatest risk. These findings may relate to more frequent use of drugs associated with marrow suppression or greater linezolid exposure in the TP cohort. Clinicians caring for transplant patients should take into account this higher risk of thrombocytopenia and need for platelets when considering use of linezolid in this population.

The association between risk factors and time of onset for thrombocytopenia in Japanese patients receiving linezolid therapy: a retrospective analysis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Linezolid (LZD) is an oxazolidinone antibiotic that is active against Gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. The major adverse effect related to its use in humans is reversible myelosuppression, which mostly manifests as thrombocytopenia. This retrospective study was conducted to identify risk factors that might contribute towards the development of thrombocytopenia due to intravenous administration of LZD.

METHOD

Patients who were administered LZD between January 2008 and March 2013 were included. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a decrease in platelet count of ≥10 × 10(4) cell/μL from baseline or of ≥30%.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were included in this study. These patients were divided into two groups: 22 patients (46·8%) were assigned to a non-thrombocytopenia group and 25 patients (53·2%) to a thrombocytopenia group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed significant intergroup differences in duration of LZD treatment [odds ratio (OR) = 1·278; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1·068-1·529; P = 0·007] and white blood cell (WBC) count (>12000 cells/μL; OR = 10·399; 95% CI = 1·667-64·882; P = 0·012).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

This finding suggests that duration of LZD treatment and WBC count (>12000 cells/μL) are risk factors associated with thrombocytopenia resulting from LZD administration.

Linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia in impaired renal function: is it time for a dose adjustment? A case report and review of literature

PURPOSE

Thrombocytopenia is a common complication in the intensive care unit (ICU), but the incidence of drug-induced thrombocytopenia (DIT) is not well defined. We investigate linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with impaired renal function. Since recent studies suggest that linezolid clearance is reduced in these patients and there are no precise data confirming that dose-adjustment should be required, we performed a systematic analysis in order to establish whether it is necessary to consider a dose adjustment and promote studies to confirm this concept.

METHODS

We report a case of thrombocytopenia (nadir 32 × 10(3)/μl) in a patient with acute kidney injury who was treated with linezolid for a MRSA pulmonary infection. We performed a systematic review of the literature through PubMed with the aim to include every case report, case series, prospective and retrospective clinical study reporting linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia with concomitant impaired renal function.

RESULTS

An increasing number of clinical studies suggest a correlation between the onset of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia and renal dysfunction. Close monitoring of platelet count and hemoglobin is recommended in patients treated with linezolid, especially in those with impaired renal function because the reduction of its clearance causes drug accumulation, as some studies have reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should consider the potential risk of this complication, especially in elderly patients with end-stage renal disease. Further studies should be encouraged to determine if the incidence of linezolid-related thrombocytopenia could be reduced by a dose adjustment according to renal function, for which currently there is still no specific recommendation.

Risk factors for linezolid-associated thrombocytopenia in adult patients

Objectives

Thrombocytopenia (TP) is a common adverse effect of linezolid (LZD). However, risk factors for LZD-associated TP have been reported in Western patients with relatively heavy body weight. The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for LZD-associated TP in Asian population.

Materials and methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 101 consecutive patients who received LZD therapy (1,200 mg/day) between July 2003 and December 2013 at a tertiary referral hospital in Tokyo, Japan. The patients with obvious other causes for TP were excluded. The information of target infectious disease, patients’ age, gender, body weight, body mass index, baseline serum creatinine (SCr), baseline platelet count, and treatment duration was collected retrospectively. TP was defined as ≥50 % decrease in platelet count from baseline. Bi- and multi-variate analyses were performed.

Results

A total of 101 patients were included (mean age [SD] 64 [18]; male gender [%], 57 [56]). Median duration [range] of LZD therapy was 14 days [1–67]. LZD-associated TP was identified in 42 patients (42 %). For TP, adjusted odds ratio (OR) [95 % CI] of daily per kg dose (DPKD) and SCr was 1.14 [1.05–1.26] and 1.51 [1.01–2.50], respectively.

Conclusions

Higher DPKD and elevated SCr are significantly associated with LZD-associated TP. These findings suggest that daily dose of LZD should be adjusted using body weight, as typically done in pediatrics, in adults as well. Renal function also should be considered for dose adjustment.

Drug-Induced Thrombocytopenia in the Critically Ill

Background:Drugs are suspected when obvious causes of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired thrombocytopenia have been excluded. It has been estimated that 10% to 25% of cases may be drug induced. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the risk of thrombocytopenia associated with drug classes commonly used in the ICU. Methods: Data concerning patients admitted for more than 48 hours between 1997 and 2011 were extracted from a research-purpose database. Patients with thrombocytopenia within the first 72 hours of admission and with diagnoses or interventions considered strongly associated with thrombocytopenia were excluded. Drug exposures were compared and adjusted for confounders using conditional logistic regression. Results: A total of 238 cases were identified after exclusions. Each case was matched according to sex, age, admission year, and admission unit with 1 control. In univariate analysis, quinolones (odds ratio [OR] = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.01-2.40) and extended spectrum β-lactams (OR = 1.71; 95% CI = 1.00-2.93) were significantly associated with an increased risk of thrombocytopenia. After adjusting for confounders, exposure to quinolones was the only drug class with a statistically significant increase in risk of thrombocytopenia (OR = 1.697; 95% CI = 1.002-2.873; P = 0.049). Conclusion: In this study of ICU-acquired thrombocytopenia, we found no association between the exposures to several antibiotic classes, anticonvulsants, antiplatelet agents, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, and heparins and thrombocytopenia. As linezolid was not studied, no conclusions can be drawn concerning this agent. The statistically significant association between quinolones and thrombocytopenia warrants further investigation.

Use of linezolid in children: an overview of recent advances

Linezolid is the first member of a new generation of antibiotics, the synthetic oxazolidinones, to become available, with a broad spectrum of in vitro activity against gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and vancomycin-resistant E. faecium. Linezolid is showing great promise currently for the treatment of multiresistant gram-positive bacterial infections, especially complicated skin infections, catheter-induced bacteremia or nosocomial pneumonia both in the community and in a hospital setting, in children and in adults. Although most recent reports are favorable and anticipatory of a more extensive use of linezolid in appropriately selected pediatric population groups in the near future, following treatment failure of conventional antimicrobial agents, more clinical trials are, however, required to investigate the safety profile and tolerability of this new antibiotic in the pediatric population.

Treatment of infections due to resistant Staphylococcus aureus

This chapter reviews data on the treatment of infections caused by drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, particularly methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). This review covers findings reported in the English language medical literature up to January of 2013. Despite the emergence of resistant and multidrug-resistant S. aureus, we have seven effective drugs in clinical use for which little resistance has been observed: vancomycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, linezolid, tigecycline, telavancin, ceftaroline, and daptomycin. However, vancomycin is less effective for infections with MRSA isolates that have a higher MIC within the susceptible range. Linezolid is probably the drug of choice for the treatment of complicated MRSA skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs); whether it is drug of choice in pneumonia remains debatable. Daptomycin has shown to be non-inferior to either vancomycin or β-lactams in the treatment of staphylococcal SSTIs, bacteremia, and right-sided endocarditis. Tigecycline was also non-inferior to comparator drugs in the treatment of SSTIs, but there is controversy about whether it is less effective than other therapeutic options in the treatment of more serious infections. Telavancin has been shown to be non-inferior to vancomycin in the treatment of SSTIs and pneumonia, but has greater nephrotoxicity. Ceftaroline is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against MRSA; it is non-inferior to vancomycin in the treatment of SSTIs. Clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline, rifampin, moxifloxacin, and minocycline are oral anti-staphylococcal agents that may have utility in the treatment of SSTIs and osteomyelitis, but the clinical data for their efficacy is limited. There are also several drugs with broad-spectrum activity against Gm-positive organisms that have reached the phase II and III stages of clinical testing that will hopefully be approved for clinical use in the upcoming years: oritavancin, dalbavancin, omadacycline, tedizolid, delafloxacin, and JNJ-Q2. Thus, there are currently many effective drugs to treat resistant S. aureus infections and many promising agents in the pipeline. Nevertheless, S. aureus remains a formidable adversary, and despite our deep bullpen of potential therapies, there are still frequent treatment failures and unfortunate clinical outcomes. The following discussion summarizes the clinical challenges presented by MRSA, the clinical experience with our current anti-MRSA antibiotics, and the gaps in our knowledge on how to use these agents to most effectively combat MRSA infections.

The Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Linezolid for the Primary and Secondary Treatment of Osteomyelitis

The pharmacokinetic profile of oral linezolid makes it an attractive alternative for the treatment of osteomyelitis. Few studies have described the efficacy of linezolid in the treatment of osteomyelitis. A retrospective, observational analysis was conducted at Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital. Patients who received oral linezolid from June 2000 to December 2002 were identified from pharmacy records. Forty-two patients who received oral linezolid for osteomyelitis at our institution were identified. Only patients who had received at least six weeks of linezolid therapy were evaluated for clinical effectiveness. Patients were also evaluated for adverse drug reactions due to linezolid. The clinical cure rate was 55% for the 20 patients who received at least six weeks of therapy. Adverse events included gastrointestinal disturbances (15%), thrombocytopenia (10%), anemia (10%), neutropenia (5%) and rash (5%). The authors conclude that oral linezolid is an alterative to intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of osteomyelitis.

Thrombocytopenia in the Intensive Care Unit

Thrombocytopenia is a common laboratory finding in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Potential etiologies of thrombocytopenia are myriad, ranging from acute disease processes and concomitant conditions to exposures and drugs. The mechanism of decreased platelet counts can also be varied: laboratory measurement may be spurious, platelet production may be decreased, or platelet destruction or sequestration may be increased. In addition to evaluation for the cause of thrombocytopenia, the clinician must also guard against spontaneous bleeding due to thrombocytopenia, prophylax against bleeding resulting from an invasive procedure performed in the setting of thrombocytopenia, and treat active bleeding related to thrombocytopenia.

A comparative evaluation of adverse platelet outcomes among Veterans' Affairs patients receiving linezolid or vancomycin

OBJECTIVES

The primary objectives were to compare the incidences of severe thrombocytopenia, critical thrombocytopenia and a relative decline in platelets from baseline (≥50% decline) between patients receiving linezolid and those receiving vancomycin. The secondary objective was to assess the relationship between vancomycin trough concentration and adverse platelet outcomes.

METHODS

A matched cohort study was performed at the Upstate New York Veterans' Affairs Healthcare Network from January 2005 until February 2008. Eligibility criteria were: (i) receipt of linezolid or vancomycin therapy for ≥48 h; (ii) initiation of therapy as an inpatient; and (iii) baseline platelets available for evaluation. Patients who received linezolid were matched 1:1 to patients who received vancomycin. Cumulative incidences and times to event for (i) platelet count ≤50,000 cells/mm(3), (ii) platelet count ≤20,000 cells/mm(3) and (iii) ≥50% decline in platelets from baseline were evaluated. Multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The study included 502 patients (251 matched pairs). The occurrences of platelet counts ≤50,000 cells/mm(3) and ≤20,000 cells/mm(3) did not differ significantly between linezolid and vancomycin patients. A ≥50% decline in platelets from baseline was observed in 78 (31.1%) patients receiving vancomycin and 43 (17.1%) patients receiving linezolid (risk ratio 0.55; 95% CI 0.40-0.77). A clear exposure-response relationship was observed between vancomycin trough concentration and ≥50% decline in platelets from baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of thrombocytopenia was low and did not differ significantly among vancomycin and linezolid patients.

Staged custom, intramedullary antibiotic spacers for severe segmental bone loss in infected total hip arthroplasty

Introduction. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) infections with severe bone loss pose significant reconstructive challenges. We present our experience with two-stage hip reimplantation using an intramedullary, antibiotic-impregnated nail. Methods. Three patients with infected THA with severe proximal femoral bone loss (Mallory type IIIB or greater) were treated using a custom antibiotic spacer. Clinical outcomes and any complications were recorded. Average followup was 49 months from final reimplantation. Results. Mean age at spacer placement (stage 1) was 53 years. The mean Harris Hip Score at final followup was 80. Two patients had asymptomatic heterotopic ossification, and one patient had a 2 cm leg-length discrepancy. Conclusions. A custom intramedullary nail antibiotic spacer is a reliable option in the staged management of the infected THA with severe proximal femoral bone loss. Benefits of this technique include limb salvage with maintenance of leg length, soft tissue tension, and functional status.

Systemic antimicrobial therapy in osteomyelitis

Appropriately designed antibiotic regimens are critical to the management of all stages of osteomyelitis, although goals of therapy may vary in different stages of infection. The most important consideration for antibiotic selection is spectrum of action. Route of administration by intravenous or oral route is less important than drug levels that are achievable at the site of infection. Outpatient parenteral therapy and use of oral agents has simplified delivery of long-term treatment regimens. There are few high-quality studies that compare specific treatment regimens or durations of therapy, and recommendations for drugs and duration of antibiotic therapy are based on expert opinion, case series, and extrapolations from animal models. Intravenous beta-lactams are the treatment of choice for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, but there are also oral options available. Vancomycin has been the treatment of choice for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis, but there are several newer parenteral and oral agents for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus including linezolid and daptomycin. Rifampin combined with other staphylococcal agents may increase cure rates, especially for device-associated infections. Oral fluoroquinolones and parenteral beta-lactam agents can be used for treatment of gram-negative osteomyelitis, but increasing resistance has complicated management of these infections.

Clinical Experience with Linezolid at a Large Academic Medical Center: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Purpose

The objectives of this study were to evaluate current patterns of use, microbiologic cure rates, and hematologic toxicities, including identification of risk factors, associated with linezolid utilization at our institution.

Methods

Utilization, clinical, microbiological, and toxicity data were collected prospectively over an 8-month period (August 1, 2006 to March 31, 2007). Binary logistic and multivariate stepwise regression analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors for linezolid-associated thrombocytopenia and anemia.

Results

A total of 116 linezolid courses (102 patients) were identified with a mean duration of therapy of 12.3 days. Appropriate infectious disease service approval and consults were found in 87.9% and 62.1% of the cases, respectively. Bloodstream, urinary tract, and respiratory tract infections accounted for 29%, 21%, and 16% of clinical indications, respectively. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and coagulase-negative staphylococci accounted for 43%, 24%, and 7% of clinical isolates, respectively. Overall, the microbiologic cure rate among evaluable patients was 83.8%. Development of thrombocytopenia was found in approximately 30% of linezolid-treated patients. Risk factors for linezolid-associated thrombocytopenia included female gender (OR 5.66, P = .002), serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 2 mg/dL (OR 4.48, P = .009), intensive care unit admission (OR 3.06, P = .038), and duration of therapy ≥ 28 days (OR 3.76, P = .049).

Conclusion

Utilization patterns may suggest strategies for conserving linezolid, including improved compliance with current approval policies and clinical pathway development. Linezolid microbiological cure rates were similar to those found in the primary literature. Linezolid-associated thrombocytopenia was common and risk factors were identified. Further well-designed prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. Hosp Pharm-2010;45(12):916-926

Drug-induced thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients

Thrombocytopenia occurs in 15% to 58% of intensive care unit patients. The incidence varies based upon patient population, timing and frequency of platelet monitoring, and definition of thrombocytopenia. Up to 25% of acutely ill patients develop drug-induced thrombocytopenia. When drug-induced thrombocytopenia is suspected, nondrug related causes must be evaluated and excluded. Establishing the diagnosis of drug-induced thrombocytopenia is challenging, as hundreds of medications have been implicated. Medications commonly associated with drug-induced thrombocytopenia include glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, cinchona alkaloids, antibiotics, anticonvulsants, and heparin. Once the diagnosis is suspected, clinicians should identify the start date of medications to assess the timeline of development. The likelihood of each medication causing thrombocytopenia must be evaluated. The risk vs. benefit of discontinuing the suspected medication and availability of alternative medications must be assessed. The role of corticosteroids, immune globulin, and plasmapheresis is uncertain. Once the offending agent has been discontinued, the overall prognosis is excellent. In the case of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, an alternative anticoagulant should be initiated. Drug-induced thrombocytopenia should be documented in the medical record and reported according to institutional and national standards. This review focuses on immune-mediated drug-induced thrombocytopenia from medications commonly utilized in the critically ill patient.

Clinical Experience of Linezolid in Bone Marrow Transplantation Patients

Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic that has been associated with myelosuppression, including leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Few studies have assessed the use of linezolid in bone marrow transplantation (BMT) patients. The authors evaluated patients who were admitted to the BMT service at their institution from 2001 to 2002 and had undergone ≥3 days of linezolid therapy. These patients (cases) were matched with BMT patients who had not undergone linezolid therapy (controls). Forty-nine patients were evaluated; 25 cases and 24 controls. The authors found no significant differences in the duration of neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, but there was a trend toward a difference in time to engraftment ( P = .16). More bleeding episodes were seen and more platelet transfusions were needed in cases than in controls (16% vs 8%; P = .35 and 54.5 ± 55.0 units vs 19.9 ± 20.0 units, respectively). Patients who had undergone linezolid therapy for >10 days (n = 10) had longer thrombocytopenia (102.2 ± 98.0 vs 62.0 ± 61.0 days; P = .27) and time to engraftment (20.5 ± 20.0 vs 10.7 ± 2.0 days; P = .16) and required more platelet transfusions (83.6 ± 76.0 vs 35.1 ± 23.0 units). None of these observations reached statistical significance. The authors conclude that linezolid therapy can be used safely in BMT patients for up to 10 days. However, when therapy is needed for >10 days, monitoring of platelet counts, bleeding time, and time to engraftment are recommended.

Retrospective cohort chart review study of factors associated with the development of thrombocytopenia in adult Japanese patients who received intravenous linezolid therapy

BACKGROUND

Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic agent active against Gram-positive bacteria. It has been associated with hematologic adverse effects such as thrombocytopenia. Little is known about the mechanism underlying thrombocytopenia in patients who receive intravenous linezolid.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the risk factors associated with the development of thrombocytopenia in adult Japanese patients who received intravenous linezolid therapy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of the medical charts of patients who were treated with linezolid 600 mg IV BID (q12h) between June 2006 and March 2008 at Gifu University Hospital in Gifu, Japan. Data were extracted from the electronic medical records obtained from a central database in the hospital. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a decrease in platelet count of > or = 25% and a final platelet count of <100 x 10(3)/mm3. Risk factors associated with thrombocytopenia in patients who received linezolid were identified via logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 42 patients (31 men and 11 women; mean [SD] age, 59.6 [12.8] years [range, 33-85 years]) were included in the study. The mean duration of linezolid therapy was 13.6 (10.1) days, with a range of 3 to 48 days. Seven patients with renal insufficiency received hemodialysis before linezolid infusion. Thrombocytopenia occurred in 7 patients (16.7%). Among the 7 patients with renal insufficiency, 2 patients (28.6%) developed severe thrombocytopenia, requiring platelet transfusion. In univariate analysis, a high daily dose of > or = 22 mg/kg (odds ratio [OR] = 20.25; 95% CI, 2.115-193.9; P = 0.009), low baseline platelet count of <200 x 10(3)/mm3 (OR = 8.437; 95% CI, 1.367-52.06), and lowered creatinine clearance of <30 mL/min (OR = 6.444; 95% CI, 1.136-36.57) were significant factors for thrombocytopenia associated with linezolid therapy; however, in multivariate analysis, only daily dose (> or = 22 mg/kg) was a significant risk factor for thrombocytopenia associated with linezolid therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The daily dose of > or = 22 mg/kg was a significant risk factor associated with thrombocytopenia in patients who received linezolid therapy. Prospective studies comparing the efficacy and safety profile of linezolid in patients receiving a conventional dose (600 mg q12h) and those receiving a weight-adjusted dose are needed to determine an adequate dose of linezolid, particularly in patients with renal insufficiency or low baseline platelet count.

Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus mycotic aneurysm

Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) continues to emerge as a cause of serious infections. We present the first case of abdominal mycotic aneurysm caused by Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive CA-MRSA. This case adds another presentation to the clinical spectrum of CA-MRSA infections, and highlights the problem encountered in the choice of the therapy of serious community-acquired infections in an era of increasing CA-MRSA infections.

New treatments for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a dynamic pathogen. Rates of MRSA are increasing worldwide. In some centers, MRSA is becoming less susceptible to vancomycin, and these strains have been associated with worse clinical outcomes. Intermediate or fully resistant vancomycin strains of MRSA have emerged clinically, whereas MRSA acquired in the community has become epidemic. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide clinicians with an evidence-based review on new treatments for MRSA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Linezolid, daptomycin and tigecycline have been approved during the last decade to treat infections due to MRSA. Although these agents are extremely valuable in the fight against MRSA, each one has limitations. New lypoglycopeptides (telavancin, dalbavancin and oritavancin) are in advanced phase of clinical development. Similarly, new broad-spectrum cephalosporins active against MRSA (e.g. ceftobiprole and ceftaroline) and a new dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor (iclaprim) are in or have completed phase 3 studies.

SUMMARY

Here, we review the most relevant information on new drugs to treat MRSA. New studies with available agents and upcoming studies with investigational drugs will help to better understand the role of each compound in the treatment of patients infected with MRSA and assist the clinician in keeping pace with this challenging pathogen.

Linezolid: a review of safety and tolerability

Linezolid has demonstrated activity against antibiotic-susceptible and antibiotic-resistant aerobic Gram-positive cocci. The availability of intravenous and oral formulations, with near 100% bioavailability of the latter, is hoped to facilitate the management of multiply drug-resistant Gram-positive infections. Linezolid was approved for clinical use in the United States in April 2000 and has subsequently been approved in other countries for the management of community-acquired and nosocomial pneumonia, complicated and uncomplicated skin and soft-tissue infections, and infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci, including cases with concurrent bacteremia. Additional studies have demonstrated potential use in febrile cancer patients with neutropenia, and case reports have documented some efficacy in the management of infective endocarditis, tuberculosis, nocardiosis, and in anaerobic infections. Given the potential for significantly increased use of linezolid, a thorough review and update of its tolerability and safety profile is warranted.

An overview of harms associated with beta-lactam antimicrobials: where do the carbapenems fit in?

The US Institute of Medicine's focus on patient safety has motivated hospital administrators to facilitate a culture of safety. As a result, subcommittees of the pharmacy and therapeutics committee have emerged in many hospitals to focus on adverse events and patient safety. Antimicrobial harms have gained the attention of practicing clinicians and hospital formulary committees, because they top the list of drugs that are associated with adverse events and because of certain serious harms that have ultimately led to the withdrawal of some antimicrobial agents. In the near future, several antimicrobials in the late phase of development will become available for clinical use (ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, and telavancin), and others (doripenem and dalbavancin) have recently joined the armamentarium. Because new antimicrobials will become part of the treatment armamentarium, it is important to discuss our current understanding of antimicrobial harms in general. Although not thought of as traditional adverse events, Clostridium difficile infection and development of resistance during therapy are adverse events that occur as a result of antimicrobial exposure and therefore are discussed. In addition, a distillation of our current understanding of β-lactam specific adverse events will be provided. Finally, new methods of administration are being evaluated that may influence peak concentration-related antimicrobial adverse events.

The use of linezolid in the treatment of infected total joint arthroplasty

Fourteen patients with a diagnosis of infected total joint arthroplasty treated by 1 or 2-stage revision and a course of oral linezolid were reviewed. Patients were assessed according to McPherson stage, inflammatory markers, nature of surgery, use of antibiotics, pathogen isolated, and outcome at follow-up. Pathogens isolated were coagulase-negative staphylococcus, multiresistant Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacter cloacae, and mixed growth. McPherson stages were 1 IB2, 1 IA3, 1 II A2, 3IIIA2, 2 IIIB1, 3 IIIB2, 1 IIIB3, 1 IIIC2, and 1 IIIC3. All patients showed resolution of infection, with normalization of inflammatory markers after treatment. Mean length of follow-up is 32.7 months (range, 9-44 months). Comparison is drawn with previous studies highlighting the good results achievable with the use of this antibiotic. Although no substitute for adequate surgical management, it does allow oral treatment and therefore avoids the difficulties associated with long-term intravenous antibiotic therapy.

Efficacy and safety of linezolid for Gram-positive orthopedic infections: a prospective case series

Linezolid is an attractive alternative for orthopedic infections because of oral bioavailability and activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. To determine efficacy and safety, we prospectively monitored 51 consecutive adults who were not vancomycin candidates and who received linezolid for 53 Gram-positive orthopedic infections, usually chronic osteomyelitis (n = 25) or prosthetic joint infection (n = 23). Pathogens were usually Staphylococcus aureus (n = 27) or coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 19); 38 were methicillin resistant. After remission, 17 infections required long-term suppression, usually because of retained hardware. Clinical and microbiologic failure occurred in only one patient. The most common adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n = 5) and anemia (n = 5), necessitating treatment discontinuation in 3 patients. One patient developed reversible optic and irreversible peripheral neuropathy after 24 months of linezolid. Linezolid, with surgery, may be a reasonable alternative for Gram-positive orthopedic infections. We recommend weekly hematologic monitoring, and, if therapy lasts >2 months, periodic ophthalmologic monitoring.

New antimicrobial agents as therapy for resistant gram-positive cocci

Vancomycin- and methicillin-resistant gram-positive cocci have emerged as an increasingly problematic cause of hospital-acquired infections. We conducted a literature review of newer antibiotics with activity against vancomycin-resistant and methicillin-resistant gram-positive cocci. Quinupristin/dalfopristin, linezolid, daptomycin, and tigecycline have in vitro activity for methicillin-resistant staphylococci and are superior to vancomycin for vancomycin-resistant isolates. Dalbavancin, telavancin, and oritavancin are new glycopeptides that have superior pharmacodynamic properties compared to vancomycin. We review the antibacterial spectrum, clinical indications and contraindications, pharmacologic properties, and adverse events associated with each of these agents. Daptomycin has rapid bactericidal activity for Staphylococcus aureus and is approved for use in bacteremia and right-sided endocarditis. Linezolid is comparable to vancomycin in patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) pneumonia and has pharmacoeconomic advantages given its oral formulation. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is the drug of choice for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium infections but has no activity against Enterococcus faecalis. Tigecycline has activity against both enterococcus species and MRSA; it is also active against Enterobacteriaceae and anaerobes which allows for use in intra-abdominal and diabetic foot infections. A review of numerous in vitro and animal model studies shows that interaction between these newer agents and other antistaphylococcal agents for S. aureus are usually indifferent (additive).

Linezolid in the treatment of implant-related chronic osteomyelitis

New antibiotics have been developed targeting resistant microorganisms; however, limited information is available on their use in implant-related chronic osteomyelitis. We evaluated the infection control rate of linezolid in treating these challenging infections and delineate indications for its use. We retrospectively reviewed 22 consecutive adult patients with chronic implant-related osteomyelitis, treated with linezolid in addition to surgical débridement and implant removal. Osteomyelitis was associated with fracture fixation implants (n = 18) or arthroplasty implants (n = 4). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the most common pathogen (10 of 22 patients). Fourteen patients had one or more comorbidity, including intravenous drug abuse in four patients. Indications for linezolid use included preference for oral administration in 13 patients, presence of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) in five patients, and development of allergic reactions to vancomycin in four patients. Fourteen patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months (mean, 22 months; range, 6-34 months) with no recurrence of infection. Linezolid is a reasonable alternative for treating chronic implant-related osteomyelitis. Our treatment protocol, including linezolid, achieved control of infection in all patients despite the challenging nature of these infections due to patient comorbidities and resistant organisms.

Comparative study of the effects of pyridoxine, rifampin, and renal function on hematological adverse events induced by linezolid

Hematological disturbances that develop during linezolid treatment are a major concern when linezolid is administered for prolonged periods of time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influences of pyridoxine, rifampin, and renal function on hematological adverse events. From January 2002 to April 2006, 52 patients received a long-term course of linezolid. Blood cell counts were monitored weekly. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a decrease to <75% of the baseline platelet count, and anemia was defined when the hemoglobin concentration decreased by > or =2 g/liter from the baseline value. Twenty-four patients received linezolid alone, and 28 patients received linezolid plus 200 mg of pyridoxine. The Kaplan-Meier survival method, followed by the log-rank test, was used to estimate the cumulative probability of adverse events, and Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the independent predictors of toxicity. The baseline characteristics of the patients in both groups were similar. The cumulative probability of thrombocytopenia and anemia in patients who received pyridoxine was not different from that in patients who did not receive it. Hematological adverse events were less frequent in patients taking rifampin and were more frequent in patients with renal failure. However; the Cox regression analysis showed that rifampin was the only independent predictor associated with a lower risk of thrombocytopenia (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.14 to 0.98; P = 0.045). In conclusion, pyridoxine did not prevent linezolid-related hematological adverse events, and the coadministration of rifampin was associated with a lower risk of thrombocytopenia.

Efficacy and tolerability of prolonged linezolid therapy in the treatment of orthopedic implant infections

The aim of the study presented here was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of linezolid in the treatment of orthopedic implant infections (OII). Eighty-five patients with an OII treated with linezolid were prospectively followed up for a minimum of 12 months from the end of antibiotic therapy. Outcome was evaluated in relation to the duration and type of symptoms (acute or chronic) and the retention or removal of the implant. For acute and chronic infections, the respective success rates were 100 and 92.3% when the implant was removed and 72.2 and 42.8% when it was not. The median length of linezolid treatment in acute and chronic infections was 47 and 60 days, respectively. Thrombocytopenia was observed in four (4.7%) patients and anemia in five (5.8%). The results suggest oral linezolid is an effective and well-tolerated alternative for treating OII.

Role of linezolid in the treatment of orthopedic infections

Gram-positive organisms, particularly staphylococci and streptococci, are responsible for the majority of bone and joint infections. The rising incidence of antimicrobial resistance among Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci and enterococci means that novel antibiotics with unique mechanisms of antimicrobial activity are needed, especially in orthopedic infections. Linezolid is the first of the oxazolidinones, a new class of antibacterial agents particularly effective against Gram-positive infections including methicillin- and vancomycin-resistant strains. With an excellent oral bioavailability and acceptable safety profile, linezolid offers a valuable alternative to more traditional therapies, such as glycopeptides. No large randomized trials have been published on its use in patients with orthopedic infections, but early results are encouraging. Reported adverse events, especially bone marrow suppression and optic neuropathy seen with prolonged administration, mean that treatment of such patients must be undertaken with careful follow-up of laboratory tests. Until now, little resistance has been reported.

Temporary antibiotic cement-covered gamma nail spacer for an infected nonunion of the proximal femur

We report the case of an infected nonunion of the proximal femoral in an elderly patient. There was extensive involvement of the entire proximal femur precluding salvage. An impromptu use of a cephalomedullary nail coated with antibiotic-laden bone cement is described, followed by reimplantation with a revision-type proximal femoral prosthesis. The patient had resection of the proximal femur, placement of a temporary functional spacer, and reimplantation after a course of antibiotics, with good success. The method we describe is a reasonable alternative when standard off-the-shelf systems or other methods of temporary spacer creation are not available.

Quality Assurance Assessment of the Use of Linezolid in the Treatment of Thermal Injury Patients at a Community Teaching Hospital

We sought to evaluate the adverse effect profile of linezolid among thermal injury patients requiring treatment for Enterococcus species or other Gram-positive infection warranting treatment with linezolid. Seventy-six inhalation injury and/or thermal injury patients experiencing 94 exposures to linezolid for 48 hours or longer (range, 2-83 days) were included. We evaluated leukocyte count and platelet count for the time period preceding, during, and after therapy with linezolid based on specified time periods of exposure for evaluation of specific adverse effects. Sixty-three of 76 (83%) patient admissions were complicated by inhalation injury. The average TBSA involvement was 34.4% (range, 0-98%). The onset of thrombocytopenia before linezolid therapy was noted in 21 of 57 patients (36.8%), which was attributable to fluid resuscitation and acute platelet consumption. After they were exposure to linezolid, 12 patients developed thrombocytopenia. Platelet counts recovered in 7 of these 12 patients with continued exposure to linezolid; however, thrombocytopenia persisted for more than 9 days after therapy in 9 patients, of whom 6 patients succumbed to sepsis. On average, thrombocytes increased by 102,000/mm3 during linezolid treatment. Leucopenia was rare in thermal injury patients, and persisting thrombocytopenia in this population was associated with sepsis and mortality. Continuing linezolid therapy after the onset of thrombocytopenia among survivors almost always resulted in recovery from thrombocytopenia.