XIST expression in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos

Gene regulation in time and space during X-chromosome inactivation

X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is the epigenetic mechanism that ensures X-linked dosage compensation between cells of females (XX karyotype) and males (XY). XCI is essential for female embryos to survive through development and requires the accurate spatiotemporal regulation of many different factors to achieve remarkable chromosome-wide gene silencing. As a result of XCI, the active and inactive X chromosomes are functionally and structurally different, with the inactive X chromosome undergoing a major conformational reorganization within the nucleus. In this Review, we discuss the multiple layers of genetic and epigenetic regulation that underlie initiation of XCI during development and then maintain it throughout life, in light of the most recent findings in this rapidly advancing field. We discuss exciting new insights into the regulation of X inactive-specific transcript (XIST), the trigger and master regulator of XCI, and into the mechanisms and dynamics that underlie the silencing of nearly all X-linked genes. Finally, given the increasing interest in understanding the impact of chromosome organization on gene regulation, we provide an overview of the factors that are thought to reshape the 3D structure of the inactive X chromosome and of the relevance of such structural changes for XCI establishment and maintenance.

LncRNA XIST Prevents Tendon Adhesion and Promotes Tendon Repair Through the miR-26a-5p/COX2 Pathway

Tendon adhesion is the biggest obstacle to repair of tendon injury. Long-chain non-coding RNA X-inactive specific transcript (lncRNA XIST) is highly expressed in populations at high risk of tendon injury. However, whether XIST participates in tendon injury and the specific mechanism remain unknown. Here, we aimed to explore the effects and underlying mechanism of XIST in tendon injury. A mouse model of tendon injury was constructed by the transection method in vivo. XIST and COX2 were highly expressed in tendon tissues of mice with tendon injury, while miR-26a-5p was lowly expressed. Fibroblasts were isolated from tendon injury mice. Overexpression of XIST promoted fibroblast proliferation and upregulated α-SMA and Collagen I protein expression, while silencing XIST indicated the opposite effects. Further dual-luciferase reporter gene assay and RIP assay verified a targeting relationship between XIST and miR-26a-5p, as well as miR-26a-5p and COX2, and XIST targeted miR-26a-5p to act on COX2 expression. miR-26a-5p inhibition and COX2 overexpression reversed the decrease in fibroblast proliferation and the downregulation of α-SMA and Collagen I expression caused by XIST silencing, while interference with si-COX2 eliminated the effects of miR-26a-5p inhibitor. This study revealed that XIST promoted fibroblast proliferation and the formation of tendon adhesion through miR-26a-5p/COX2 pathway, suggesting that XIST/miR-26a-5p/COX2 may be a potential target for the treatment of tendon injury.

An improved method for specific-target preamplification PCR analysis of single blastocysts useful for embryo sexing and high-throughput gene expression analysis

Gene expression analysis in preimplantation embryos has been used for answering fundamental questions related to development, prediction of pregnancy outcome, and other topics. Limited amounts of mRNA in preimplantation embryos hinders progress in studying the preimplantation embryo. Here, a method was developed involving direct synthesis and specific-target preamplification (STA) of cDNA for gene expression analysis in single blastocysts. Effective cell lysis and genomic DNA removal steps were incorporated into the method. In addition, conditions for real-time PCR of cDNA generated from these processes were improved. By using this system, reliable embryo sexing results based on expression of sex-chromosome linked genes was demonstrated. Calibration curve analysis of PCR results using the Fluidigm Biomark microfluidic platform (Fluidigm, South San Francisco, CA) was performed to evaluate 96 STA cDNA from single blastocysts. In total, 93.75% of the genes were validated. Robust amplification was detected even when STA cDNA from a single blastocyst was diluted 1,024-fold. Further analysis showed that within-assay variation increased when cycle threshold values exceeded 18. Overall, STA quantitative real-time PCR analysis was shown to be useful for analysis of gene expression of multiple specific targets in single blastocysts.

X chromosome inactivation in human development

X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is a key developmental process taking place in female mammals to compensate for the imbalance in the dosage of X-chromosomal genes between sexes. It is a formidable example of concerted gene regulation and a paradigm for epigenetic processes. Although XCI has been substantially deciphered in the mouse model, how this process is initiated in humans has long remained unexplored. However, recent advances in the experimental capacity to access human embryonic-derived material and in the laws governing ethical considerations of human embryonic research have allowed us to enlighten this black box. Here, we will summarize the current knowledge of human XCI, mainly based on the analyses of embryos derived from in vitro fertilization and of pluripotent stem cells, and highlight any unanswered questions.

A primate-specific retroviral enhancer wires the XACT lncRNA into the core pluripotency network in humans

Transposable elements (TEs) have been proposed to play an important role in driving the expansion of gene regulatory networks during mammalian evolution, notably by contributing to the evolution and function of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). XACT is a primate-specific TE-derived lncRNA that coats active X chromosomes in pluripotent cells and may contribute to species-specific regulation of X-chromosome inactivation. Here we explore how different families of TEs have contributed to shaping the XACT locus and coupling its expression to pluripotency. Through a combination of sequence analysis across primates, transcriptional interference, and genome editing, we identify a critical enhancer for the regulation of the XACT locus that evolved from an ancestral group of mammalian endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), prior to the emergence of XACT. This ERV was hijacked by younger hominoid-specific ERVs that gave rise to the promoter of XACT, thus wiring its expression to the pluripotency network. This work illustrates how retroviral-derived sequences may intervene in species-specific regulatory pathways.

RNA-seq as a tool for evaluating human embryo competence

The majority of embryos created through in vitro fertilization (IVF) do not implant. It seems plausible that rates of implantation would improve if we had a better understanding of molecular factors affecting embryo competence. Currently, the process of selecting an embryo for uterine transfer uses an ad hoc combination of morphological criteria, the kinetics of development, and genetic testing for aneuploidy. However, no single criterion can ensure selection of a viable embryo. In contrast, RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) of embryos could yield high-dimensional data, which may provide additional insight and illuminate the discrepancies among current selection criteria. Recent advances enabling the production of RNA-seq libraries from single cells have facilitated the application of this technique to the study of transcriptional events in early human development. However, these studies have not assessed the quality of their constituent embryos relative to commonly used embryological criteria. Here, we perform proof-of-principle advancement to embryo selection procedures by generating RNA-seq libraries from a trophectoderm biopsy as well as the remaining whole embryo. We combine state-of-the-art embryological methods with low-input RNA-seq to develop the first transcriptome-wide approach for assessing embryo competence. Specifically, we show the capacity of RNA-seq as a promising tool in preimplantation screening by showing that biopsies of an embryo can capture valuable information available in the whole embryo from which they are derived. Furthermore, we show that this technique can be used to generate a RNA-based digital karyotype and to identify candidate competence-associated genes. Together, these data establish the foundation for a future RNA-based diagnostic in IVF.

DNA methylation and functional characterization of the XIST gene during in vitro early embryo development in cattle

XIST, in association with the shorter ncRNA RepA, are essential for the initiation of X chromosome inactivation (XCI) in mice. The molecular mechanisms controlling XIST and RepA expression are well characterized in that specie. However, little is known in livestock. We aimed to characterize the DNA methylation status along the 5' portion of XIST and to characterize its transcriptional profile during early development in cattle. Three genomic regions of XIST named here as promoter, RepA and DMR1 had their DNA methylation status characterized in gametes and embryos. Expression profile of XIST was evaluated, including sense and antisense transcription. Oocytes showed higher levels of methylation than spermatozoa that was demethylated. DMR1 was hypermethylated throughout oogenesis. At the 8-16-cell embryo stage DMR1 was completed demethylated. Interestingly, RepA gain methylation during oocyte maturation and was demethylated at the blastocyst stage, later than DMR1. These results suggest that DMR1 and RepA are transient differentially methylated regions in cattle. XIST RNA was detected in matured oocytes and in single cells from the 2-cell to the morula stage, confirming the presence of maternal and embryonic transcripts. Sense and antisense transcripts were detected along the XIST in blastocyst. In silico analysis identified 63 novel transcript candidates at bovine XIST locus from both the plus and minus strands. Taking together these results improve our understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in XCI initiation in cattle. This information may be useful for the improvement of assisted reproductive technologies in livestock considering that in vitro conditions may impair epigenetic reprogramming.

Determination of single embryo sex in Macaca mulatta and Mus musculus RNA-Seq transcriptome profiles

To account for sex as a biological variable, it is sometimes necessary to identify the sex of an embryo or embryonic cell that was used to generate libraries for RNA sequencing, without the sex being known a priori. The preferred approach for this would take advantage of the mRNA data, rather than relying on other methods that require separation and analysis of genomic DNA or diversion of limiting RNA for other assays. We describe here a method that has been optimized for this purpose in samples of rhesus monkey and mouse embryos. This method is broadly applicable to any species for which a sufficiently well characterized genome and knowledge of polymorphisms are available, and for embryos that are transcriptionally active and expressing their genome.

X chromosome inactivation in human pluripotent stem cells as a model for human development: back to the drawing board?

BACKGROUND

Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSC), both embryonic and induced (hESC and hiPSC), are regarded as a valuable in vitro model for early human development. In order to fulfil this promise, it is important that these cells mimic as closely as possible the in vivo molecular events, both at the genetic and epigenetic level. One of the most important epigenetic events during early human development is X chromosome inactivation (XCI), the transcriptional silencing of one of the two X chromosomes in female cells. XCI is important for proper development and aberrant XCI has been linked to several pathologies. Recently, novel data obtained using high throughput single-cell technology during human preimplantation development have suggested that the XCI mechanism is substantially different from XCI in mouse. It has also been suggested that hPSC show higher complexity in XCI than the mouse. Here we compare the available recent data to understand whether XCI during human preimplantation can be properly recapitulated using hPSC.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

We will summarize what is known on the timing and mechanisms of XCI during human preimplantation development. We will compare this to the XCI patterns that are observed during hPSC derivation, culture and differentiation, and comment on the cause of the aberrant XCI patterns observed in hPSC. Finally, we will discuss the implications of the aberrant XCI patterns on the applicability of hPSC as an in vitro model for human development and as cell source for regenerative medicine.

SEARCH METHODS

Combinations of the following keywords were applied as search criteria in the PubMed database: X chromosome inactivation, preimplantation development, embryonic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, primordial germ cells, differentiation.

OUTCOMES

Recent single-cell RNASeq data have shed new light on the XCI process during human preimplantation development. These indicate a gradual inactivation on both XX chromosomes, starting from Day 4 of development and followed by a random choice to inactivate one of them, instead of the mechanism in mice where imprinted XCI is followed by random XCI. We have put these new findings in perspective using previous data obtained in human (and mouse) embryos. In addition, there is an ongoing discussion whether or not hPSC lines show X chromosome reactivation upon derivation, mimicking the earliest embryonic cells, and the XCI states observed during culture of hPSC are highly variable. Recent studies have shown that hPSC rapidly progress to highly aberrant XCI patterns and that this process is probably driven by suboptimal culture conditions. Importantly, these aberrant XCI states seem to be inherited by the differentiated hPSC-progeny.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

The aberrant XCI states (and epigenetic instability) observed in hPSC throw a shadow on their applicability as an in vitro model for development and disease modelling. Moreover, as the aberrant XCI states observed in hPSC seem to shift to a more malignant phenotype, this may also have important consequences for the safety aspect of using hPSC in the clinic.

Function and evolution of the long noncoding RNA circuitry orchestrating X-chromosome inactivation in mammals

X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is a chromosome-wide regulatory process that ensures dosage compensation for X-linked genes in Theria. XCI is established during early embryogenesis and is developmentally regulated. Different XCI strategies exist in mammalian infraclasses and the regulation of this process varies also among closely related species. In Eutheria, initiation of XCI is orchestrated by a cis-acting locus, the X-inactivation center (Xic), which is particularly enriched in genes producing long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). Among these, Xist generates a master transcript that coats and propagates along the future inactive X-chromosome in cis, establishing X-chromosome wide transcriptional repression through interaction with several protein partners. Other lncRNAs also participate to the regulation of X-inactivation but the extent to which their function has been maintained in evolution is still poorly understood. In Metatheria, Xist is not conserved, but another, evolutionary independent lncRNA with similar properties, Rsx, has been identified, suggesting that lncRNA-mediated XCI represents an evolutionary advantage. Here, we review current knowledge on the interplay of X chromosome-encoded lncRNAs in ensuring proper establishment and maintenance of chromosome-wide silencing, and discuss the evolutionary implications of the emergence of species-specific lncRNAs in the control of XCI within Theria. WIREs RNA 2016, 7:702-722. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1359 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Single-Cell XIST Expression in Human Preimplantation Embryos and Newly Reprogrammed Female Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

The process of X chromosome inactivation (XCI) during reprogramming to produce human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), as well as during the extensive programming that occurs in human preimplantation development, is not well‐understood. Indeed, studies of XCI during reprogramming to iPSCs report cells with two active X chromosomes and/or cells with one inactive X chromosome. Here, we examine expression of the long noncoding RNA, XIST, in single cells of human embryos through the oocyte‐to‐embryo transition and in new mRNA reprogrammed iPSCs. We show that XIST is first expressed beginning at the 4‐cell stage, coincident with the onset of embryonic genome activation in an asynchronous manner. Additionally, we report that mRNA reprogramming produces iPSCs that initially express XIST transcript; however, expression is rapidly lost with culture. Loss of XIST and H3K27me3 enrichment at the inactive X chromosome at late passage results in X chromosome expression changes. Our data may contribute to applications in disease modeling and potential translational applications of female stem cells. Stem Cells2015;33:1771–1781

Totipotency: what it is and what it is not

There is surprising confusion surrounding the concept of biological totipotency, both within the scientific community and in society at large. Increasingly, ethical objections to scientific research have both practical and political implications. Ethical controversy surrounding an area of research can have a chilling effect on investors and industry, which in turn slows the development of novel medical therapies. In this context, clarifying precisely what is meant by "totipotency" and how it is experimentally determined will both avoid unnecessary controversy and potentially reduce inappropriate barriers to research. Here, the concept of totipotency is discussed, and the confusions surrounding this term in the scientific and nonscientific literature are considered. A new term, "plenipotent," is proposed to resolve this confusion. The requirement for specific, oocyte-derived cytoplasm as a component of totipotency is outlined. Finally, the implications of twinning for our understanding of totipotency are discussed.

Species-specific differences in X chromosome inactivation in mammals

In female mammals, the dosage difference in X-linked genes between XX females and XY males is compensated for by inactivating one of the two X chromosomes during early development. Since the discovery of the X inactive-specific transcript (XIST) gene in humans and its subsequent isolation of the mouse homolog, Xist, in the early 1990s, the molecular basis of X chromosome inactivation (X-inactivation) has been more fully elucidated using genetically manipulated mouse embryos and embryonic stem cells. Studies on X-inactivation in other mammals, although limited when compared with those in the mice, have revealed that, while their inactive X chromosome shares many features with those in the mice, there are marked differences in not only some epigenetic modifications of the inactive X chromosome but also when and how X-inactivation is initiated during early embryonic development. Such differences raise the issue about what extent of the molecular basis of X-inactivation in the mice is commonly shared among others. Recognizing similarities and differences in X-inactivation among mammals may provide further insight into our understanding of not only the evolutionary but also the molecular aspects for the mechanism of X-inactivation. Here, we reviewed species-specific differences in X-inactivation and discussed what these differences may reveal.

Different flavors of X-chromosome inactivation in mammals

Dosage compensation of X-linked gene products between the sexes in therians has culminated in the inactivation of one of the two X chromosomes in female cells. Over the years, the mouse has been the preferred animal model to study this X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) process in placental mammals (eutherians). Similar to the imprinted inactivation of the paternally inherited X chromosome (Xp) in marsupials (methatherians), the Xp is inactivated during early mouse development. In this eutherian model, cell derivatives of the primitive endoderm (PE) and trophectoderm (TE) will continue to display this imprinted form of XCI. Cells developing from the mouse epiblast will reactivate the Xp, and subsequently initiate XCI of either the Xp or the maternally inherited Xm, in a random manner. Examination of XCI in other eutherians and in metatherians, however, indicates clear differences in the form and timing of XCI. This review highlights and discusses imprinted and random XCI from such a comparative viewpoint.

Concise review: Pluripotency and the transcriptional inactivation of the female Mammalian X chromosome

X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is a striking example of developmentally regulated, wide-range heterochromatin formation that is initiated during early embryonic development. XCI is a mechanism of dosage compensation unique to placental mammals whereby one X chromosome in every diploid cell of the female organism is transcriptionally silenced to equalize X-linked gene levels to XY males. In the embryo, XCI is random with respect to whether the maternal or paternal X chromosome is inactivated and is established in epiblast cells on implantation of the blastocyst. Conveniently, ex vivo differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells recapitulates random XCI and permits mechanistic dissection of this stepwise process that leads to stable epigenetic silencing. Here, we focus on recent studies in mouse models characterizing the molecular players of this female-specific process with an emphasis on those relevant to the pluripotent state. Further, we will summarize advances characterizing XCI states in human pluripotent cells, where surprising differences from the mouse process may have far-reaching implications for human pluripotent cell biology.

Analysis of imprinted gene expression in normal fertilized and uniparental preimplantation porcine embryos

In the present study quantitative real-time PCR was used to determine the expression status of eight imprinted genes (GRB10, H19, IGF2R, XIST, IGF2, NNAT, PEG1 and PEG10) during preimplantation development, in normal fertilized and uniparental porcine embryos. The results demonstrated that, in all observed embryo samples, a non imprinted gene expression pattern up to the 16-cell stage of development was common for most genes. This was true for all classes of embryo, regardless of parental-origins and the direction of imprint. However, several differentially expressed genes (H19, IGF2, XIST and PEG10) were detected amongst the classes at the blastocyst stage of development. Most interestingly and despite the fact that maternally and paternally expressed genes should not be expressed in androgenones and parthenogenones, respectively, both uniparental embryos expressed these genes when tested for in this study. In order to account for this phenomenon, we compared the expression patterns of eight imprinted genes along with the methylation status of the IGF2/H19 DMR3 in haploid and diploid parthenogenetic embryos. Our findings revealed that IGF2, NNAT and PEG10 were silenced in haploid but not diploid parthenogenetic blastocysts and differential methylation of the IGF2/H19 DMR3 was consistently observed between haploid and diploid parthenogenetic blastocysts. These results appear to suggest that there exists a process to adjust the expression status of imprinted genes in diploid parthenogenetic embryos and that this phenomenon may be associated with altered methylation at an imprinting control region. In addition we believe that imprinted expression occurs in at least four genes, namely H19, IGF2, XIST and PEG10 in porcine blastocyst stage embryos.

The single active X in human cells: evolutionary tinkering personified

All mammals compensate for sex differences in numbers of X chromosomes by transcribing only a single X chromosome in cells of both sexes; however, they differ from one another in the details of the compensatory mechanisms. These species variations result from chance mutations, species differences in the staging of developmental events, and interactions between events that occur concurrently. Such variations, which have only recently been appreciated, do not interfere with the strategy of establishing a single active X, but they influence how it is carried out. In an overview of X dosage compensation in human cells, I point out the evolutionary variations. I also argue that it is the single active X that is chosen, rather than inactive ones. Further, I suggest that the initial events in the process-those that precede silencing of future inactive X chromosomes-include randomly choosing the future active X, most likely by repressing its XIST locus.

XCI in preimplantation mouse and human embryos: first there is remodelling…

Female eutherians silence one of their X chromosomes to accomplish an equal dose of X-linked gene expression compared with males. The mouse is the most widely used animal model in XCI research and has proven to be of great significance for understanding the complex mechanism of X-linked dosage compensation. Although the basic principles of XCI are similar in mouse and humans, differences exist in the timing of XCI initiation, the genetic elements involved in XCI regulation and the form of XCI in specific tissues. Therefore, the mouse has its limitations as a model to understand early human XCI and analysis of human tissues is required. In this review, we describe these differences with respect to initiation of XCI in human and mouse preimplantation embryos, the extra-embryonic tissues and the in vitro model of the epiblast: the embryonic stem cells.

Linking X chromosome inactivation to pluripotency: Necessity or fate?

Silencing one X chromosome is essential for the development of female mammals, but the regulation of this process appears to vary between species. In the mouse, which has thus far been the leading model system in the field, X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is tightly coupled to pluripotency and the underlying mechanisms have just begun to be deciphered. However, mechanistic aspects of XCI regulation in other species have yet to be thoroughly investigated. Here we review current knowledge of the developmental regulation of XCI in mice and humans and discuss the extent to which the intimate link between XCI and pluripotency extends beyond rodents.

A comparative genome analysis of gene expression reveals different regulatory mechanisms between mouse and human embryo pre-implantation development

BACKGROUND

Pre-implantation development is a crucial step in successful implantation and pregnancy in mammals. It has been studied in depth, but mostly in laboratory animal models. Less is known about the regulatory mechanism involved in the pre-implantation development in humans and about the comparative aspects.

METHODS

Here, we employed the microarray datasets from the public database library of GEO and applied comparative analysis of genome wide temporal gene expression data based on statistical analysis and functional annotation for both mouse and human, demonstrating the discordance between the regulatory mechanisms of both mouse and human pre-implantation development.

RESULTS

There were differences between mouse and human pre-implantation development both in the global gene expression pattern and in the expression changes of individual genes at each stage, including different major transient waves of transcription profiles and some stage-specific genes and significantly related pathways. There also appeared to be different functional changes from one stage to another between mouse and human.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis presented here lead to interesting and complementary conclusions that the regulatory mechanism of human pre-implantation development is not completely the same as the mouse. Not as the fact that 1-cell to 2-cell stage is important for mouse pre-implantation development, the 4-cell stage and 8-cell stage are both essential for human. Unlike in mouse, of which most of pathways found were related to energy, RNA and protein metabolism, the identified pathways in human were mostly disease-related and associated with human pre-implantation embryonic development. All of these suggest that a further comparative analysis should be required for applying the result of mouse expression data to human research or therapy, particularly in pre-implantation developments. Our study provides several potential targets of genes and pathways for studying the regulatory mechanism of human pre-implantation development using mouse model.

Getting to the center of X-chromosome inactivation: the role of transgenes

X-chromosome inactivation is a fascinating epigenetic phenomenon that is initiated by expression of a noncoding (nc)RNA, XIST, and results in transcriptional silencing of 1 female X. The process requires a series of events that begins even before XIST expression, and culminates in an active and a silent X within the same nucleus. We will focus on the role that transgenic systems have served in the current understanding of the process of X-chromosome inactivation, both in the initial delineation of an active and inactive X, and in the function of the XIST RNA. X inactivation is strictly cis-limited; recent studies have revealed elements within the X-inactivation center, the region required for inactivation, that are critical for the initial regulation of Xist expression and chromosome pairing. It has been revealed that the X-inactivation center contains a remarkable compendium of cis-regulatory elements, ncRNAs, and trans-acting pairing regions. We review the functional componentry of the X-inactivation center and discuss experiments that helped to dissect the XIST/Xist RNA and its involvement in the establishment of facultative heterochromatin.

X chromosome inactivation and embryonic stem cells

X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is a process required to equalize the dosage of X-encoded genes between female and male cells. XCI is initiated very early during female embryonic development or upon differentiation of female embryonic stem (ES) cells and results in inactivation of one X chromosome in every female somatic cell. The regulation of XCI involves factors that also play a crucial role in ES cell maintenance and differentiation and the XCI process therefore provides a beautiful paradigm to study ES cell biology. In this chapter we describe the important cis and trans acting regulators of XCI and introduce the models that have been postulated to explain initiation of XCI in female cells only. We also discuss the proteins involved in the establishment of the inactive X chromosome and describe the different chromatin modifications associated with the inactivation process. Finally, we describe the potential of mouse and human ES and induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells as model systems to study the XCI process.

Resetting the epigenome beyond pluripotency in the germline

Germ cells undergo comprehensive epigenetic reprogramming toward acquiring fitness for pluripotency and totipotency. Notably, the full extent of the epigenetic reprogramming experienced by germ cells remains unmatched by attempts to experimentally restore pluripotency in somatic cells. We propose that the defects present in experimentally generated cells are corrected upon differentiation into the germ cell lineage, as has been observed in cases of germline transmission. Unraveling the mechanisms responsible for germ cell-specific epigenetic reprogramming will likely have important implications for both basic and clinical stem cell research.

X chromosome inactivation is initiated in human preimplantation embryos

X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is the mammalian mechanism that compensates for the difference in gene dosage between XX females and XY males. Genetic and epigenetic regulatory mechanisms induce transcriptional silencing of one X chromosome in female cells. In mouse embryos, XCI is initiated at the preimplantation stage following early whole-genome activation. It is widely thought that human embryos do not employ XCI prior to implantation. Here, we show that female preimplantation embryos have a progressive accumulation of XIST RNA on one of the two X chromosomes, starting around the 8-cell stage. XIST RNA accumulates at the morula and blastocyst stages and is associated with transcriptional silencing of the XIST-coated chromosomal region. These findings indicate that XCI is initiated in female human preimplantation-stage embryos and suggest that preimplantation dosage compensation is evolutionarily conserved in placental mammals.

X chromosome dosage compensation: how mammals keep the balance

The development of genetic sex determination and cytologically distinct sex chromosomes leads to the potential problem of gene dosage imbalances between autosomes and sex chromosomes and also between males and females. To circumvent these imbalances, mammals have developed an elaborate system of dosage compensation that includes both upregulation and repression of the X chromosome. Recent advances have provided insights into the evolutionary history of how both the imprinted and random forms of X chromosome inactivation have come about. Furthermore, our understanding of the epigenetic switch at the X-inactivation center and the molecular aspects of chromosome-wide silencing has greatly improved recently. Here, we review various facets of the ever-expanding field of mammalian dosage compensation and discuss its evolutionary, developmental, and mechanistic components.

Genomic imprinting mechanisms in mammals

Genomic imprinting is a form of epigenetic gene regulation that results in expression from a single allele in a parent-of-origin-dependent manner. This form of monoallelic expression affects a small but growing number of genes and is essential to normal mammalian development. Despite extensive studies and some major breakthroughs regarding this intriguing phenomenon, we have not yet fully characterized the underlying molecular mechanisms of genomic imprinting. This is in part due to the complexity of the system in that the epigenetic markings required for proper imprinting must be established in the germline, maintained throughout development, and then erased before being re-established in the next generation's germline. Furthermore, imprinted gene expression is often tissue or stage-specific. It has also become clear that while imprinted loci across the genome seem to rely consistently on epigenetic markings of DNA methylation and/or histone modifications to discern parental alleles, the regulatory activities underlying these markings vary among loci. Here, we discuss different modes of imprinting regulation in mammals and how perturbations of these systems result in human disease. We focus on the mechanism of genomic imprinting mediated by insulators as is present at the H19/Igf2 locus, and by non-coding RNA present at the Igf2r and Kcnq1 loci. In addition to imprinting mechanisms at autosomal loci, what is known about imprinted X-chromosome inactivation and how it compares to autosomal imprinting is also discussed. Overall, this review summarizes many years of imprinting research, while pointing out exciting new discoveries that further elucidate the mechanism of genomic imprinting, and speculating on areas that require further investigation.

X-inactivation reveals epigenetic anomalies in most hESC but identifies sublines that initiate as expected

The clinical and research value of human embryonic stem cells (hESC) depends upon maintaining their epigenetically naïve, fully undifferentiated state. Inactivation of one X chromosome in each cell of mammalian female embryos is a paradigm for one of the earliest steps in cell specialization through formation of facultative heterochromatin. Mouse ES cells are derived from the inner cell mass (ICM) of blastocyst stage embryos prior to X-inactivation, and cultured murine ES cells initiate this process only upon differentiation. Less is known about human X-inactivation during early development. To identify a human ES cell model for X-inactivation and study differences in the epigenetic state of hESC lines, we investigated X-inactivation in all growth competent, karyotypically normal, NIH approved, female hESC lines and several sublines. In the vast majority of undifferentiated cultures of nine lines examined, essentially all cells exhibit hallmarks of X-inactivation. However, subcultures of any hESC line can vary in X-inactivation status, comprising distinct sublines. Importantly, we identified rare sublines that have not yet inactivated Xi and retain competence to undergo X-inactivation upon differentiation. Other sublines exhibit defects in counting or maintenance of XIST expression on Xi. The few hESC sublines identified that have not yet inactivated Xi may reflect the earlier epigenetic state of the human ICM and represent the most promising source of NIH hESC for study of human X-inactivation. The many epigenetic anomalies seen indicate that maintenance of fully unspecialized cells, which have not formed Xi facultative heterochromatin, is a delicate epigenetic balance difficult to maintain in culture.

Impact of in vitro production techniques on the expression of X-linked genes in bovine (bos taurus) oocytes and pre-attachment embryos

Our previous studies showed that expression patterns of X-linked genes in cultured cells are different from those of their tissues of origin. This investigation analyses the transcription pattern of the X-linked genes BIRC4, GAB3, MECP2, RPS4X, SLC25A6, and XIST in bovine in vitro matured oocytes and in vitro fertilized embryos, and their in vivo counterparts. In vitro-derived pools of mature oocytes and pre-attachment embryos were obtained by: (a) TCM-199/serum with bovine oviductal epithelial cells as co-culture, and (b) synthetic oviductal fluid/BSA. Pools of in vivo-derived morulae and blastocysts were provided by a commercial embryo transfer operation. Total RNA was extracted for quantification of gene-specific transcript levels using real-time quantitative PCR. Statistical analysis was performed using a mixed model factorial ANOVA with alpha = 0.05. The effect of the in vitro environmental conditions on X-linked gene transcription was most evident during the fourth cell cycle, at the period of activation of the embryonic genome, and seemed to be less pronounced at later developmental stages, with the exception of BIRC4. The levels of X-linked genes transcripts in in vivo-derived embryos were lower relative to their in vitro counterparts for all genes tested. Finally, the pattern of expression of XIST in bovine oocytes and embryos was similar to that reported in humans. These results highlight the possibility that X-linked gene expression analysis is a useful tool to monitor the impact of reproductive biotechnologies on the developmental potential of embryos and aid in their improvement.

Limited evolutionary conservation of imprinting in the human placenta

The epigenetic phenomenon of genomic imprinting provides an additional level of gene regulation that is confined to a limited number of genes, frequently, but not exclusively, important for embryonic development. The evolution and maintenance of imprinting has been linked to the balance between the allocation of maternal resources to the developing fetus and the mother's well being. Genes that are imprinted in both the embryo and extraembryonic tissues show extensive conservation between a mouse and a human. Here we examine the human orthologues of mouse genes imprinted only in the placenta, assaying allele-specific expression and epigenetic modifications. The genes from the KCNQ1 domain and the isolated human orthologues of the imprinted genes Gatm and Dcn all are expressed biallelically in the human, from first-trimester trophoblast through to term. This lack of imprinting is independent of promoter CpG methylation and correlates with the absence of the allelic histone modifications dimethylation of lysine-9 residue of H3 (H3K9me2) and trimethylation of lysine-27 residue of H3 (H3K27me3). These specific histone modifications are thought to contribute toward regulation of imprinting in the mouse. Genes from the IGF2R domain show polymorphic concordant expression in the placenta, with imprinting demonstrated in only a minority of samples. Together these findings have important implications for understanding the evolution of mammalian genomic imprinting. Because most human pregnancies are singletons, this absence of competition might explain the comparatively relaxed need in the human for placental-specific imprinting.

SILENCING OF THE MAMMALIAN X CHROMOSOME

Mammalian X chromosome inactivation is one of the most striking examples of epigenetic gene regulation. Early in development one of the pair of approximately 160-Mb X chromosomes is chosen to be silenced, and this silencing is then stably inherited through subsequent somatic cell divisions. Recent advances have revealed many of the chromatin changes that underlie this stable silencing of an entire chromosome. The key initiator of these changes is a functional RNA, XIST, which is transcribed from, and associates with, the inactive X chromosome, although the mechanism of association with the inactive X and recruitment of facultative heterochromatin remain to be elucidated. This review describes the unique evolutionary history and resulting genomic structure of the X chromosome as well as the current understanding of the factors and events involved in silencing an X chromosome in mammals.

X-inactivation status varies in human embryonic stem cell lines

Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) derived from human blastocysts have an apparently unlimited proliferative capacity and can differentiate into ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. As such, hESC lines have enormous potential for use in cell replacement therapies. It must first be demonstrated, however, that hESCs maintain a stable karyotype and phenotype and that gene expression is appropriately regulated. To date, different hESC lines exhibit similar patterns of expression of markers associated with pluripotent cells. However, the evaluation of epigenetic status of hESC lines has only recently been initiated. One example of epigenetic gene regulation is dosage compensation of the X chromosome in mammalian females. This is achieved through an epigenetic event referred to as X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), an event initiated upon cellular differentiation. We provide the first evidence that undifferentiated hESC lines exhibit different patterns of XCI.

Co-evolution of X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting in mammals

Recent studies have revealed mechanistic parallels between imprinted X-chromosome inactivation and autosomal imprinting. We suggest that neither mechanism was present in ancestral egg-laying mammals, and that both arose when the evolution of the placenta exerted selective pressure to imprint growth-related genes. We also propose that non-coding RNAs and histone modifications were adopted for the imprinting of growth suppressors on the X chromosome and on autosomes. This provides a unified hypothesis for the evolution of X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting.

Beyond sense: the role of antisense RNA in controlling Xist expression

The Xist RNA is a critical component of X inactivation, and Tsix is a non-coding antisense RNA to the Xist gene. We review the data from mouse that demonstrates that Tsix serves to regulate Xist expression. TSIX antisense transcripts have also been detected in humans, but without a manipulatable system to study the inactivation process in humans it remains unknown whether these antisense transcripts are functional in regulating human XIST. After a review of the differences between the human and mouse antisense, we discuss how the question of whether or not the human TSIX is functional impacts models of Tsix function.

Characterization of expression at the human XIST locus in somatic, embryonal carcinoma, and transgenic cell lines

X inactivation requires XIST, a functional RNA that is expressed exclusively from, and localizes to, the inactive X in female somatic cells. In mouse, low-level unstable transcription of Xist is observed prior to the time of inactivation, and an antisense transcript, Tsix, is a critical regulator of early Xist expression. To examine the presence and impact of an antisense transcript in humans we have characterized the extent of sense and antisense transcription in human somatic, transgenic, and embryonal carcinoma (EC) cell lines. Downstream antisense expression at the human XIST locus was not detected in somatic cells, but was detected in the EC line N-Tera2D1 and in somatic cells with an ectopic XIST locus. Presence of the antisense did not disrupt the stability or localization of the sense transcript. We have also identified additional sense transcripts in EC and female somatic cells and demonstrate that the 5' flanking JPX/ENOX gene is expressed from both the active and the inactive X chromosome in somatic cell hybrids, delimiting the extent of inactive X-specific transcriptional control in somatic cells. These analyses reveal similarities to and differences from the murine Xist and Tsix transcripts and generate a complex picture of developmentally regulated transcription through the region.

Xist RNA and the mechanism of X chromosome inactivation

Dosage compensation in mammals is achieved by the transcriptional inactivation of one X chromosome in female cells. From the time X chromosome inactivation was initially described, it was clear that several mechanisms must be precisely integrated to achieve correct regulation of this complex process. X-inactivation appears to be triggered upon differentiation, suggesting its regulation by developmental cues. Whereas any number of X chromosomes greater than one is silenced, only one X chromosome remains active. Silencing on the inactive X chromosome coincides with the acquisition of a multitude of chromatin modifications, resulting in the formation of extraordinarily stable facultative heterochromatin that is faithfully propagated through subsequent cell divisions. The integration of all these processes requires a region of the X chromosome known as the X-inactivation center, which contains the Xist gene and its cis-regulatory elements. Xist encodes an RNA molecule that plays critical roles in the choice of which X chromosome remains active, and in the initial spread and establishment of silencing on the inactive X chromosome. We are now on the threshold of discovering the factors that regulate and interact with Xist to control X-inactivation, and closer to an understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underlie this complex process.

X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) patterns in placental tissues of a paternally derived bal t(X;20) case

Non-random X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is often seen in female carriers of balanced X-autosome translocations and is generally attributed to a selective growth of cells that inactivate the normal X chromosome. However, little is known concerning when in development the selection acts, and thus whether skewed XCI would also be seen in placental tissues. Furthermore, as males with X-autosome translocations are normally infertile, all translocations studied to date for XCI-skewing have been either maternal or de novo in origin. We now present an analysis of XCI status in cord blood, umbilical cord and four different extraembryonic tissues from a female carrier of a paternally derived balanced (X;20) translocation. Using methylation based assays to determine XCI status, we found preferential inactivation of the non-translocated X in cord blood, umbilical cord and amnion samples of the propositus. Remarkably, random XCI was evident in several placental tissues analyzed (chorion, and chorionic villi trophoblast and mesenchyme). While these findings support the hypothesis of strong selection against cells with an inactive translocated X-chromosome in most embryonic/fetal tissues, they also suggest weaker selective forces taking place during placental development. Additionally, the finding of normal placental development in the present case, rules out the possibility of a parental bias to XCI in human extraembryonic tissues as a requisite for normal development. The finding of hypomethylation in extraembryonic tissues for two out of three markers used in the study is consistent with previous findings demonstrating low levels of methylation in these tissues.

Developmentally-regulated changes of Xist RNA levels in single preimplantation mouse embryos, as revealed by quantitative real-time PCR

Xist RNA localizes to the inactive X chromosome in cells of late cleavage stage female mouse embryos (Sheardown et al., 1997: Cell 91:99-107). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), however, does not quantify the number of Xist transcripts per nucleus. We have used real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to measure Xist RNA levels in single preimplantation embryos and to establish developmental profiles in both female and male samples. The gender of each embryo was readily established based on Xist RNA levels, by counting Xist gene copies per cell, and by independent detection of the presence/absence of Sry, a Y chromosome-specific gene. Xist expression in males was found to be very low at all stages, as suggested by FISH. In contrast, female embryos contained measurable levels of Xist mRNA starting at the late 2-cell stage and rapidly accumulated Xist transcripts until morula stage. Xist RNA accumulation per embryo then reached a plateau, while cell division continued. We propose that during early cleavage high enough levels of Xist mRNA are transcribed to generate a pool of unbound molecules. This pool would serve to temporarily maintain X chromosome inactivation without additional transcription while the trophectoderm and inner cell mass (ICM) differentiate. The ICM would then loose the paternally imprinted pattern of X inactivation originally present in all embryonic cells.

In vitro production and nuclear transfer affect dosage compensation of the X-linked gene transcripts G6PD, PGK, and Xist in preimplantation bovine embryos

Equal expression of X-linked genes such as G6PD and PGK in females and males and the initiation of X-chromosome inactivation are critically dependent on the expression of the X-inactive specific transcript (Xist). The objective of the present study was to determine the effects of in vitro production (IVP) and nuclear transfer (NT) on the relative abundance (RA) of the X-linked transcripts G6PD, PGK, and Xist in preimplantation bovine embryos. In experiment 1, sex-determined IVP or in vivo-produced embryos were analyzed for mRNA expression of the 3 genes. The sex ratio was 36% vs. 64% in IVP blastocysts and thus deviated significantly from the expected ratio of 50% in the vivo control group. The RA of G6PD transcripts was significantly higher in female IVP embryos than in male embryos. In contrast, no significant differences were seen between in vivo-derived female embryos and their male counterparts. At the morula stage, female IVP embryos transcribed significantly more PGK mRNA than did male embryos. However, blastocysts did not exhibit significant differences in PGK transcripts. No differences were observed for in vivo-derived embryos with regard to the RA of PGK transcripts. The RA of Xist mRNA was significantly higher in all female embryos than in their male counterparts. In experiment 2, IVP, in vivo-developed, NT-derived, and parthenogenetic embryos carrying two X chromosomes of either maternal and paternal origin or of maternal origin only (parthenogenotes) were analyzed for the RA of the 3 genes. In NT-derived morulae, the RA of G6PD transcripts was significantly increased compared with their IVP and in vivo-generated counterparts. G6PD transcript levels were significantly increased in IVP blastocysts compared with in vivo-generated and parthenogenetic embryos. At the morula stage, PGK transcripts were similar in all groups, but the RA of PGK transcripts was significantly higher in IVP blastocysts than in their in vivo-generated, parthenogenetic, and NT-derived counterparts. The RA of Xist was significantly elevated in NT-derived morulae compared with IVP, in vivo-generated, and parthenogenetic embryos. NT-derived blastocysts showed an increased Xist expression compared with that of IVP, in vivo-generated, and parthenogenetic embryos. Results of the present study show for the first time that differences in X-chromosome-linked gene transcript levels are related to a perturbed dosage compensation in female and male IVP and female NT-derived embryos. This finding warrants further studies to improve IVP systems and NT protocols to ensure the production of embryos with normal gene expression patterns.

Mouse Xist expression begins at zygotic genome activation and is timed by a zygotic clock

The imprinted mouse Xist (X-inactive specific transcript) gene is involved in the initiation of X-chromosome inactivation. Only the paternal Xist is expressed in preimplantation development beginning from the 4-cell stage, preceding and in correlation with paternal X-inactivation in the extraembryonic lineage of the blastocyst. To better understand the mechanisms regulating Xist expression in early development, we investigated the precise timing of its onset. We set up a single-cell RT-PCR for the simultaneous analysis on single embryos of Xist and Hprt (internal control) cDNAs and a Y-chromosome specific DNA sequence, Zfy (for embryo sexing). Applying this procedure, we demonstrate that Xist expression begins at the G2-phase of 2-cell female embryos, earlier than previously reported and at the same time of the major wave of zygotic genome activation (ZGA). We then examined, if Xist expression at the 2-cell stage is dependent on the lapse of time spent since fertilization, as previously reported for zygotic genes. One-cell embryos at the G2-phase of the first cell-cycle were cultured with cytochalasin D (inhibitor of cytokinesis but not of DNA synthesis or nuclear progression) for a time equivalent to the 4-cell stage in control, untreated embryos. We show that Xist activation occurs at a scheduled time following fertilization despite the embryos being blocked at the 1-cell stage, suggesting the existence of a zygotic clock involved in the regulation of the transcription of this imprinted gene.

Characterization of the genomic Xist locus in rodents reveals conservation of overall gene structure and tandem repeats but rapid evolution of unique sequence

The Xist locus plays a central role in the regulation of X chromosome inactivation in mammals, although its exact mode of action remains to be elucidated. Evolutionary studies are important in identifying conserved genomic regions and defining their possible function. Here we report cloning, sequence analysis, and detailed characterization of the Xist gene from four closely related species of common vole (field mouse), Microtus arvalis. Our analysis reveals that there is overall conservation of Xist gene structure both between different vole species and relative to mouse and human Xist/XIST. Within transcribed sequence, there is significant conservation over five short regions of unique sequence and also over Xist-specific tandem repeats. The majority of unique sequences, however, are evolving at an unexpectedly high rate. This is also evident from analysis of flanking sequences, which reveals a very high rate of rearrangement and invasion of dispersed repeats. We discuss these results in the context of Xist gene function and evolution.

Effects of X chromosome number and parental origin on X-linked gene expression in preimplantation mouse embryos

Diploid androgenetic mouse embryos, possessing two sets of paternally inherited chromosomes, and control fertilized embryos were used to examine the relative effects of X chromosome number and parental chromosome origin on androgenone viability and X-linked gene expression. A significant difference in efficiency of blastocyst formation was observed between XX and XY androgenones in some experiments, but this difference was not uniformly observed. Significant effects of both X chromosome number and parental origin on X-linked gene expression were observed. Male and female control embryos expressed the XIST: RNA initially. This expression was followed by a preferential reduction in XIST: RNA abundance in male embryos, indicating that dosage compensation for the X chromosome may normally require the downregulation of XIST: RNA expression in male embryos, in conjunction with the production of stable XIST: transcripts in female embryos. By the late blastocyst stage, XX control embryos expressed significantly more XIST: RNA than did XY embryos. Unlike their normal counterparts, XX androgenones did not express significantly more XIST: RNA than did XY androgenones at the late blastocyst stage. Androgenones exhibited severe repression of the Pgk1 gene, but during development to the late blastocyst stage Pgk1 mRNA expression increased in XX androgenones and decreased in XY androgenones. Thus, the initial repression of the Pgk1 gene in XX androgenones was lost as the XIST: RNA declined in abundance, and this loss was correlated with a failure of XX androgenones to express significantly more XIST: RNA than did XY androgenones. These results indicate that androgenones may lack a factor that is expressed from the maternal genome and required for dosage compensation in preimplantation embryos. The results also indicate that early dosage compensation in preimplantation embryos may normally be reversible, thus providing flexibility to meet different developmental requirements of the embryonic and extraembryonic lineages.

Translation of maternal messenger ribonucleic acids encoding transcription factors during genome activation in early mouse embryos

Embryonic genome activation (EGA) in mice is sensitive to treatment with cycloheximide, indicating that protein synthesis plays an important role in mediating EGA. We hypothesized that regulated maternal mRNA recruitment may control the time of EGA by controlling the time of appearance of certain transcription factors (TFs). We also hypothesized that synthesis of other TFs may contribute to EGA independently of controlling the timing of EGA. To test these hypotheses, we used sucrose density gradient fractionation coupled to a quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction method to compare polysomal mRNA abundances of specific TF mRNAs between metaphase II oocytes, 1-cell-stage embryos, and 2-cell-stage embryos. We observed a 2-cell-stage-specific increase in polysomal abundance of mouse TEA DNA binding domain 2 (mTEAD-2) mRNA, coincident with the first appearance of mTEAD activity in the early embryo. The mRNAs encoding Sp1, TATA binding protein, and cyclic AMP response element binding protein did not undergo translational recruitment, but exhibited differences in polysomal abundance. We also observed a continuous, high proportion in the polysomal fraction for the mRNA encoding ribosomal protein L23 mRNA, which contrasted with the patterns observed for other maternal transcripts. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that regulated recruitment of maternal TF mRNAs may control the time of activation of some genes during EGA, and that continuous synthesis of other TFs, like Sp1, may facilitate EGA.

Identification of genes expressed in human primordial germ cells at the time of entry of the female germ line into meiosis

In mammals, primordial germ cells (PGCs) are first observed in the extraembryonic mesoderm from where they migrate through the hindgut and its mesentery to the genital ridge to colonize the developing gonads. Soon after reaching the gonads, the female PGCs enter meiosis, while the male PGCs are arrested in mitosis and enter meiosis postnatally. To gain an insight into the molecular events controlling human germ cell development, we determined specific profiles of gene expression using cDNA prepared from PGCs isolated from male and female fetal gonads at 10 weeks gestation, when female PGCs start to enter meiosis. The identity of the isolated PGCs, and the cDNA molecules prepared from them, was confirmed respectively, by alkaline phosphatase staining and by the presence of transcripts of OCT4, a marker gene for PGCs and pluripotent stem cells in mice. Using differential display to compare the profiles of gene expression of male and female germ cells with each other and with that of a whole 10 week old fetus, we have identified eight transcripts differentially expressed in male and/or female germ cells. Among these transcripts, we have identified a member of the olfactory receptor gene family, which contains genes known to be germline-specific in the dog and possibly associated with chemotactic function. Another transcript is common to a previously isolated sequence from the human testis and we have extended this sequence towards the 5' end for partial characterization. The germline-specific sequences also include two novel sequences not represented in the databases. These findings are highly encouraging for the elucidation of the genetic programming of male and female germ line development.

Human XIST yeast artificial chromosome transgenes show partial X inactivation center function in mouse embryonic stem cells

Initiation of X chromosome inactivation requires the presence, in cis, of the X inactivation center (XIC). The Xist gene, which lies within the XIC region in both human and mouse and has the unique property of being expressed only from the inactive X chromosome in female somatic cells, is known to be essential for X inactivation based on targeted deletions in the mouse. Although our understanding of the developmental regulation and function of the mouse Xist gene has progressed rapidly, less is known about its human homolog. To address this and to assess the cross-species conservation of X inactivation, a 480-kb yeast artificial chromosome containing the human XIST gene was introduced into mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells. The human XIST transcript was expressed and could coat the mouse autosome from which it was transcribed, indicating that the factors required for cis association are conserved in mouse ES cells. Cis inactivation as a result of human XIST expression was found in only a proportion of differentiated cells, suggesting that the events downstream of XIST RNA coating that culminate in stable inactivation may require species-specific factors. Human XIST RNA appears to coat mouse autosomes in ES cells before in vitro differentiation, in contrast to the behavior of the mouse Xist gene in undifferentiated ES cells, where an unstable transcript and no chromosome coating are found. This may not only reflect important species differences in Xist regulation but also provides evidence that factors implicated in Xist RNA chromosome coating may already be present in undifferentiated ES cells.

X inactive-specific transcript (Xist) expression and X chromosome inactivation in the preattachment bovine embryo

Expression of the X inactive-specific transcript (Xist) is thought to be essential for the initiation of X chromosome inactivation and dosage compensation during female embryo development. In the present study, we analyzed the patterns of Xist transcription and the onset of X chromosome inactivation in bovine preattachment embryos. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) revealed the presence of Xist transcripts in all adult female somatic tissues evaluated. In contrast, among the male tissues examined, Xist expression was detected only in testis. No evidence for Xist transcription was observed after a single round of RT-PCR from pools of in vitro-derived embryos at the 2- to 4-cell stage. Xist transcripts were detected as a faint amplicon at the 8-cell stage initially, and consistently thereafter in all stages examined up to and including the expanded blastocyst stage. Xist transcripts, however, were subsequently detected from the 2-cell stage onward after nested RT-PCR. Preferential [3H]thymidine labeling indicative of late replication of one of the X chromosomes was noted in female embryos of different developmental ages as follows: 2 of 7 (28.5%) early blastocysts, 6 of 13 (46.1%) blastocysts, 8 of 11 (72.1%) expanded blastocysts, and 14 of 17 (77.7%) hatched blastocysts. These results suggest that Xist expression precedes the onset of late replication in the bovine embryo, in a pattern compatible with a possible role of bovine Xist in the initiation of X chromosome inactivation.

Genomic imprinting: implications for human disease

Genomic imprinting refers to an epigenetic marking of genes that results in monoallelic expression. This parent-of-origin dependent phenomenon is a notable exception to the laws of Mendelian genetics. Imprinted genes are intricately involved in fetal and behavioral development. Consequently, abnormal expression of these genes results in numerous human genetic disorders including carcinogenesis. This paper reviews genomic imprinting and its role in human disease. Additional information about imprinted genes can be found on the Genomic Imprinting Website at http://www.geneimprint.com.