1
|
Winter SF, Vaios EJ, Shih HA, Grassberger C, Parsons MW, Gardner MM, Ehret F, Kaul D, Boehmerle W, Endres M, Dietrich J. Mitigating Radiotoxicity in the Central Nervous System: Role of Proton Therapy. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:1524-1549. [PMID: 37728819 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01131-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Central nervous system (CNS) radiotoxicity remains a challenge in neuro-oncology. Dose distribution advantages of protons over photons have prompted increased use of brain-directed proton therapy. While well-recognized among pediatric populations, the benefit of proton therapy among adults with CNS malignancies remains controversial. We herein discuss the role of protons in mitigating late CNS radiotoxicities in adult patients. Despite limited clinical trials, evidence suggests toxicity profile advantages of protons over conventional radiotherapy, including retention of neurocognitive function and brain volume. Modelling studies predict superior dose conformality of protons versus state-of-the-art photon techniques reduces late radiogenic vasculopathies, endocrinopathies, and malignancies. Conversely, potentially higher brain tissue necrosis rates following proton therapy highlight a need to resolve uncertainties surrounding the impact of variable biological effectiveness of protons on dose distribution. Clinical trials comparing best photon and particle-based therapy are underway to establish whether protons substantially improve long-term treatment-related outcomes in adults with CNS malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian F Winter
- Department of Neurology and MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Junior Clinician Scientist Program, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Eugene J Vaios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Helen A Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Clemens Grassberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael W Parsons
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychology Assessment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melissa M Gardner
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychology Assessment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Felix Ehret
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Junior Clinician Scientist Program, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Boehmerle
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Endres
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- ExcellenceCluster NeuroCure, Berlin, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Department of Neurology and MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Omiya S, Komatsu S, Terashima K, Yamasaki N, Matsuo Y, Toyama H, Tokumaru S, Okimoto T, Fukumoto T. Hepatic Resection vs Particle Therapy as an Initial Treatment for Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Bi-institutional Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. J Am Coll Surg 2023; 236:972-981. [PMID: 36537706 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is limited to hepatic resection (HR), radiofrequency ablation, and liver transplantation, but the value of particle therapy (PT) as an initial treatment remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of HR and PT for single HCC. STUDY DESIGN A total of 554 patients with single HCC without vascular invasion were enrolled from January 2000 to December 2015. Patients underwent either HR (n = 279) or PT (n = 275) as initial treatments. A one-to-one propensity score-matching analysis was performed to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival after dividing patients according to liver function as assessed by the modified albumin-bilirubin grade. RESULTS The median OS (130 vs 85 months, p = 0.001) and progression-free survival (47 vs 30 months HR, p = 0.004) of HR were also significantly better than that of PT in the propensity score-matching cohort with modified albumin-bilirubin grade 1/2a (n = 145 per group). Meanwhile, in a propensity score-matching cohort with modified albumin-bilirubin grade 2b/3 (n = 53 per group), there were no significant differences in median OS and progression-free survival between HR and PT. CONCLUSIONS HR may be preferable as an initial treatment for patients with single HCC without vascular invasion, especially those with preserved liver function. PT can be an acceptable alternative to HR for patients without surgical indication and/or impaired liver function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Omiya
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan (Omiya, Komatsu, Yamasaki, Toyama, Fukumoto)
| | - Shohei Komatsu
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan (Omiya, Komatsu, Yamasaki, Toyama, Fukumoto)
| | - Kazuki Terashima
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan (Terashima, Matsuo, Tokumaru, Okimoto)
| | - Nobuaki Yamasaki
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan (Omiya, Komatsu, Yamasaki, Toyama, Fukumoto)
| | - Yoshiro Matsuo
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan (Terashima, Matsuo, Tokumaru, Okimoto)
| | - Hirochika Toyama
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan (Omiya, Komatsu, Yamasaki, Toyama, Fukumoto)
| | - Sunao Tokumaru
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan (Terashima, Matsuo, Tokumaru, Okimoto)
| | - Tomoaki Okimoto
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan (Terashima, Matsuo, Tokumaru, Okimoto)
| | - Takumi Fukumoto
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan (Omiya, Komatsu, Yamasaki, Toyama, Fukumoto)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jalbout W, Jbara R, Rizk C, Youssef B. On the risk of secondary cancer from thymoma radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac7c50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. This study aims at quantifying the lifetime attributable risk of secondary fatal cancer (LARFAC) to patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy treatment for thymoma, a neoplasm where cure rates and life expectancy are relatively high, patient age at presentation relatively low and indications for radiotherapy controversial depending on the disease stage. Approach. An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned, organs were contoured and a standard 6 MV 3DCRT treatment plan was produced for thymoma treatment. The phantom was loaded with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and treated by linear accelerator per plan. The TLDs were subsequently read for out-of-field dose distribution while in-field dose distribution was obtained from the planning system. Sex and age-specific lifetime radiogenic cancer risk was calculated as the sum of in-field risk and out-of-field risk. The latter risk was estimated using hybrid ICRP 2007 103-BEIR VII tables of organ-specific risks based on the linear-no threshold (LNT) model and applicable at low doses, while the former using mathematical risk models applicable at high doses. Main results. The LARFAC associated with a prescribed dose of 50 Gy to target volume in 25 fractions was in the approximate range of 1%–3%. The risk was higher for young and female patients. The largest contributing organ to this risk were the lungs by far. Using the LNT model inappropriately to calculate risk at therapeutic doses (in-field) would overestimate the risk up to tenfold. Significance. The LARFAC to patient from thymoma radiotherapy was quantified taking into consideration the inapplicability of the LNT model at therapeutic doses. The risk is not negligible; the information may be relevant to patients and clinicians.
Collapse
|
4
|
Shimizu S, Mizumoto M, Okumura T, Li Y, Baba K, Murakami M, Ishida T, Nakamura M, Hiroshima Y, Iizumi T, Saito T, Numajiri H, Nakai K, Hata M, Sakurai H. Proton beam therapy for a giant hepatic hemangioma: A case report and literature review. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 27:152-156. [PMID: 33665385 PMCID: PMC7902997 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Hepatic hemangiomas are benign tumors with a favorable prognosis, but giant hepatic hemangiomas can cause abdominal symptoms and are indicated for treatment. Most cases are treated with surgery, but radiotherapy has also been used. However, to date, there have been no reports of proton beam therapy for a hepatic hemangioma. Case presentation A 46-year-old woman had a tumor of 80 × 80 mm in the left medial lobe of the liver, which was diagnosed as a giant hemangioma based on the contrast pattern. Therapy was required for a giant hepatic hemangioma with symptoms, but the patient refused blood transfusion due to religious reasons, which made surgical resection difficult. Therefore, she was referred to our hospital for proton beam therapy. At her first visit, liver function was Child-Pugh A (5 points) and there was no elevation of tumor markers. Proton beam therapy of 28.6 Gy (RBE) given in 13 fractions was performed without interruption. The only observed acute radiation toxicity was Grade 1 dermatitis. One year after proton beam therapy, the hemangioma had significantly decreased, and a complete response has been maintained for 15 years based on ultrasound and MRI. Conclusion This case is the first reported use of proton beam therapy for a hepatic hemangioma. The outcome suggests that this treatment may be effective for a giant liver hemangioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shosei Shimizu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Okumura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Yinuo Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Keiichirou Baba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Motohiro Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Toshiki Ishida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Yuichi Hiroshima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Takashi Iizumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Takashi Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Haruko Numajiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Kei Nakai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Masaharu Hata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chadha AS, Gunther JR, Hsieh CE, Aliru M, Mahadevan LS, Venkatesulu BP, Crane CH, Das P, Herman JM, Koay EJ, Taniguchi C, Holliday EB, Minsky BD, Suh Y, Park P, Sawakuchi G, Beddar S, Odisio BC, Gupta S, Loyer E, Kaur H, Raghav K, Javle MM, Kaseb AO, Krishnan S. Proton beam therapy outcomes for localized unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2019; 133:54-61. [PMID: 30935582 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2018] [Revised: 10/21/2018] [Accepted: 10/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This study documents the utilization and efficacy of proton beam therapy (PBT) in western patients with localized unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS AND METHODS Forty-six patients with HCC, Child-Pugh class of A or B, no prior radiotherapy history, and ECOG performance status 0-2 received PBT at our institution from 2007 to 2016. Radiographic control within the PBT field (local control, LC) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the start of PBT. RESULTS Most (83%) patients had Child-Pugh class A. Median tumor size was 6 cm (range, 1.5-21.0 cm); 22% of patients had multiple tumors and 28% had tumor vascular thrombosis. Twenty-five (54%) patients received prior treatment. Median biologically effective dose (BED) was 97.7 GyE (range, 33.6-144 GyE) administered in 15 fractions. Actuarial 2-year LC and OS rates were 81% and 62% respectively; median OS was 30.7 months. Out-of-field intrahepatic failure was the most common site of disease progression. Patients receiving BED ≥90 GyE had a significantly better OS than those receiving BED <90 GyE (49.9 vs. 15.8 months, p = 0.037). A trend toward 2-year LC improvement was observed in patients receiving BED ≥90 GyE compared with those receiving BED <90 GyE (92% vs. 63%, p = 0.096). On multivariate analysis, higher BED (p = 0.023; hazard ratio = 0.308) significantly predicted improved OS. Six (13%) patients experienced acute grade 3 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS High-dose PBT is associated with high rates of LC and OS for unresectable HCC. Dose escalation may further improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Awalpreet S Chadha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Jillian R Gunther
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Cheng-En Hsieh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States; Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Maureen Aliru
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Lakshmi S Mahadevan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Bhanu P Venkatesulu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Cullen Taniguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Emma B Holliday
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Yelin Suh
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Peter Park
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Gabriel Sawakuchi
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Sam Beddar
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Bruno C Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Sanjay Gupta
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Evelyne Loyer
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Harmeet Kaur
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Kanwal Raghav
- Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Milind M Javle
- Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Ahmed O Kaseb
- Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Apisarnthanarax S, Bowen SR, Combs SE. Proton Beam Therapy and Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Semin Radiat Oncol 2018; 28:309-320. [PMID: 30309641 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2018.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Charged particle therapy with proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has emerged as a promising radiation modality to minimize radiation hepatotoxicity while maintaining high rates of tumor local control. Both PBT and CIRT deposit the majority of their dose at the Bragg peak with little to no exit dose, resulting in superior sparing of normal liver tissue. CIRT has an additional biological advantage of increased relative biological effectiveness, which may allow for increased hypofractionation regimens. Retrospective and prospective studies have demonstrated encouragingly high rates of local control and overall survival and low rates of hepatotoxicity with PBT and CIRT. Ongoing randomized trials will evaluate the value of PBT over photons and other standard liver-directed therapies and future randomized trials are needed to assess the value of CIRT over PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephen R Bowen
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University München, Munich, Germany; Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy, Helmholtzzentrum München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shibata S, Takamatsu S, Yamamoto K, Mizuhata M, Bou S, Sato Y, Kawamura M, Asahi S, Tameshige Y, Maeda Y, Sasaki M, Kumano T, Kobayashi S, Tamamura H, Gabata T. Proton Beam Therapy without Fiducial Markers Using Four-Dimensional CT Planning for Large Hepatocellular Carcinomas. Cancers (Basel) 2018; 10:E71. [PMID: 29538310 PMCID: PMC5876646 DOI: 10.3390/cancers10030071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Revised: 03/07/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
We evaluated the effectiveness and toxicity of proton beam therapy (PBT) for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) >5 cm without fiducial markers using four-dimensional CT (4D-CT) planning. The subjects were 29 patients treated at our hospital between March 2011 and March 2015. The median total dose was 76 Cobalt Gray Equivalents (CGE) in 20 fractions (range; 66-80.5 CGE in 10-32 fractions). Therapy was delivered with end-expiratory phase gating. An internal target volume (ITV) margin was added through the analysis of respiratory movement with 4D-CT. Patient age ranged from 38 to 87 years (median, 71 years). Twenty-four patients were Child-Pugh class A and five patients were class B. Tumor size ranged from 5.0 to 13.9 cm (median, 6.9 cm). The follow-up period ranged from 2 to 72 months (median; 27 months). All patients completed PBT according to the treatment protocol without grade 4 (CTCAE v4.03 (draft v5.0)) or higher adverse effects. The two-year local tumor control (LTC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 95%, 22%, and 61%, respectively. The LTC was not inferior to that of previous reports using fiducial markers. Respiratory-gated PBT with 4D-CT planning without fiducial markers is a less invasive and equally effective treatment for large HCCs as PBT with fiducial markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Shibata
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui 910-8526, Japan.
| | - Shigeyuki Takamatsu
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui 910-8526, Japan.
- Department of Radiotherapy, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8641, Japan.
| | - Kazutaka Yamamoto
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui 910-8526, Japan.
| | - Miu Mizuhata
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui 910-8526, Japan.
| | - Sayuri Bou
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui 910-8526, Japan.
| | - Yoshitaka Sato
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui 910-8526, Japan.
| | - Mariko Kawamura
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8560, Japan.
| | - Satoko Asahi
- Department of Radiology, University of Fukui Hospital, Eiheiji, Fukui 910-1193, Japan.
| | - Yuji Tameshige
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui 910-8526, Japan.
| | - Yoshikazu Maeda
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui 910-8526, Japan.
| | - Makoto Sasaki
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui 910-8526, Japan.
| | - Tomoyasu Kumano
- Department of Radiotherapy, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8641, Japan.
| | - Satoshi Kobayashi
- Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8641, Japan.
| | - Hiroyasu Tamamura
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui 910-8526, Japan.
| | - Toshifumi Gabata
- Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8641, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Proceedings of the National Cancer Institute Workshop on Charged Particle Radiobiology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 100:816-831. [PMID: 29485053 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2017] [Revised: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 12/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
In April 2016, the National Cancer Institute hosted a multidisciplinary workshop to discuss the current knowledge of the radiobiological aspects of charged particles used in cancer therapy to identify gaps in that knowledge that might hinder the effective clinical use of charged particles and to propose research that could help fill those gaps. The workshop was organized into 10 topics ranging from biophysical models to clinical trials and included treatment optimization, relative biological effectiveness of tumors and normal tissues, hypofractionation with particles, combination with immunotherapy, "omics," hypoxia, and particle-induced second malignancies. Given that the most commonly used charged particle in the clinic currently is protons, much of the discussion revolved around evaluating the state of knowledge and current practice of using a relative biological effectiveness of 1.1 for protons. Discussion also included the potential advantages of heavier ions, notably carbon ions, because of their increased biological effectiveness, especially for tumors frequently considered to be radiation resistant, increased effectiveness in hypoxic cells, and potential for differentially altering immune responses. The participants identified a large number of research areas in which information is needed to inform the most effective use of charged particles in the future in clinical radiation therapy. This unique form of radiation therapy holds great promise for improving cancer treatment.
Collapse
|
9
|
Yeung RH, Chapman TR, Bowen SR, Apisarnthanarax S. Proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2017; 17:911-924. [PMID: 28825506 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1368392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiation therapy is an effective treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. However, radiotherapy for HCC still has limited recognition as a standard treatment option in international consensus guidelines due to a paucity of randomized controlled trials and the risk of hepatotoxicity, which is primarily mediated by baseline liver function and dose delivered to non-tumor liver cells. Proton beam therapy (PBT) may offer advantages over photon-based radiation treatments through its dosimetric characteristic of sparing more liver volume at low to moderate doses. PBT has the potential to reduce radiation-related hepatotoxicity and allow for tumor dose escalation. Areas covered: This article reviews the clinical rationale for using PBT for HCC patients and clinical outcome and toxicity data from retrospective and prospective studies. PBT-specific technical challenges for these tumors and appropriate selection of patients to be treated with PBT are discussed. Expert commentary: Local control, overall survival, and toxicity results are promising for liver PBT. Future studies, including ongoing randomized cooperative group trials, will aim to determine the incremental benefit of PBT over photons and which patients are most suitable for PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosanna H Yeung
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , University of Washington , Seattle WA , USA
| | - Tobias R Chapman
- b Department of Radiation Oncology , Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School , Boston MA , USA
| | - Stephen R Bowen
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , University of Washington , Seattle WA , USA.,c Department of Radiology , University of Washington , Seattle WA , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kry SF, Bednarz B, Howell RM, Dauer L, Followill D, Klein E, Paganetti H, Wang B, Wuu CS, George Xu X. AAPM TG 158: Measurement and calculation of doses outside the treated volume from external-beam radiation therapy. Med Phys 2017; 44:e391-e429. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 164] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2016] [Revised: 05/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen F. Kry
- Department of Radiation Physics; MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX 77054 USA
| | - Bryan Bednarz
- Department of Medical Physics; University of Wisconsin; Madison WI 53705 USA
| | - Rebecca M. Howell
- Department of Radiation Physics; MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX 77054 USA
| | - Larry Dauer
- Departments of Medical Physics/Radiology; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; New York NY 10065 USA
| | - David Followill
- Department of Radiation Physics; MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX 77054 USA
| | - Eric Klein
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Washington University; Saint Louis MO 63110 USA
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Boston MA 02114 USA
| | - Brian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University of Louisville; Louisville KY 40202 USA
| | - Cheng-Shie Wuu
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Columbia University; New York NY 10032 USA
| | - X. George Xu
- Department of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Nuclear Engineering; Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy NY 12180 USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Comparative study of the calculated risk of radiation-induced cancer after photon- and proton-beam based radiosurgery of liver metastases. Phys Med 2017; 42:263-270. [PMID: 28366554 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2016] [Revised: 02/21/2017] [Accepted: 03/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The potential of proton therapy to improve the sparing of the healthy tissue has been demonstrated in several studies. However, even small doses delivered to the organs at risk (OAR) may induce long-term detriments after radiotherapy. In this study, we investigated the possibility to reduce the risk of radiation-induced secondary cancers with intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), when used for radiosurgery of liver metastases. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ten patients, previously treated for liver metastases with photon-beam based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) were retrospectively planned for radiosurgery with IMPT. A treatment plan comparison was then performed in terms of calculated risk of radiation-induced secondary cancer. The risks were estimated using two distinct models (Dasu et al., 2005; Schneider et al., 2005, 2009). The plans were compared pairwise with a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS Reduced risks for induction of fatal and other types of cancers were estimated for the IMPT plans (p<0.05) with the Dasu et al. MODEL Using the Schneider et al. model, lower risks for carcinoma-induction with IMPT were estimated for the skin, lungs, healthy part of the liver, esophagus and the remaining part of the body (p<0.05). The risk of observing sarcomas in the bone was also reduced with IMPT (p<0.05). CONCLUSION The findings of this study indicate that the risks of radiation-induced secondary cancers after radiosurgery of liver metastases may be reduced, if IMPT is used instead of photon-beam based SBRT.
Collapse
|
12
|
Homann K, Howell R, Eley J. The need for individualized studies to compare radiogenic second cancer (RSC) risk in proton versus photon Hodgkin Lymphoma patient treatments. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016. [DOI: 10.14319/jpt.11.8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
13
|
Rechner LA, Eley JG, Howell RM, Zhang R, Mirkovic D, Newhauser WD. Risk-optimized proton therapy to minimize radiogenic second cancers. Phys Med Biol 2015; 60:3999-4013. [PMID: 25919133 PMCID: PMC4443860 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/10/3999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Proton therapy confers substantially lower predicted risk of second cancer compared with photon therapy. However, no previous studies have used an algorithmic approach to optimize beam angle or fluence-modulation for proton therapy to minimize those risks. The objectives of this study were to demonstrate the feasibility of risk-optimized proton therapy and to determine the combination of beam angles and fluence weights that minimizes the risk of second cancer in the bladder and rectum for a prostate cancer patient. We used 6 risk models to predict excess relative risk of second cancer. Treatment planning utilized a combination of a commercial treatment planning system and an in-house risk-optimization algorithm. When normal-tissue dose constraints were incorporated in treatment planning, the risk model that incorporated the effects of fractionation, initiation, inactivation, repopulation and promotion selected a combination of anterior and lateral beams, which lowered the relative risk by 21% for the bladder and 30% for the rectum compared to the lateral-opposed beam arrangement. Other results were found for other risk models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A. Rechner
- The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Present Address: Department of Radiation Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 København Ø, Denmark
| | - John G. Eley
- The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Rebecca M. Howell
- The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Rui Zhang
- The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, 202 Nicholson Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
| | - Dragan Mirkovic
- The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Wayne D. Newhauser
- The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, 202 Nicholson Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
- Department of Medical Physics, Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, 4950 Essen Lane, Baton Rouge, LA 70809, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
The physics of proton therapy has advanced considerably since it was proposed in 1946. Today analytical equations and numerical simulation methods are available to predict and characterize many aspects of proton therapy. This article reviews the basic aspects of the physics of proton therapy, including proton interaction mechanisms, proton transport calculations, the determination of dose from therapeutic and stray radiations, and shielding design. The article discusses underlying processes as well as selected practical experimental and theoretical methods. We conclude by briefly speculating on possible future areas of research of relevance to the physics of proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wayne D Newhauser
- Medical Physics Program, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, 202 Nicholson Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA
- Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, 4950 Essen Lane, Baton Rouge, LA, 70809, USA
| | - Rui Zhang
- Medical Physics Program, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, 202 Nicholson Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA
- Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, 4950 Essen Lane, Baton Rouge, LA, 70809, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Implementation of an analytical model for leakage neutron equivalent dose in a proton radiotherapy planning system. Cancers (Basel) 2015; 7:427-38. [PMID: 25768061 PMCID: PMC4381266 DOI: 10.3390/cancers7010427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2014] [Revised: 02/12/2015] [Accepted: 03/02/2015] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Equivalent dose from neutrons produced during proton radiotherapy increases the predicted risk of radiogenic late effects. However, out-of-field neutron dose is not taken into account by commercial proton radiotherapy treatment planning systems. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing an analytical model to calculate leakage neutron equivalent dose in a treatment planning system. Passive scattering proton treatment plans were created for a water phantom and for a patient. For both the phantom and patient, the neutron equivalent doses were small but non-negligible and extended far beyond the therapeutic field. The time required for neutron equivalent dose calculation was 1.6 times longer than that required for proton dose calculation, with a total calculation time of less than 1 h on one processor for both treatment plans. Our results demonstrate that it is feasible to predict neutron equivalent dose distributions using an analytical dose algorithm for individual patients with irregular surfaces and internal tissue heterogeneities. Eventually, personalized estimates of neutron equivalent dose to organs far from the treatment field may guide clinicians to create treatment plans that reduce the risk of late effects.
Collapse
|
16
|
Inter-Institutional Comparison of Personalized Risk Assessments for Second Malignant Neoplasms for a 13-Year-Old Girl Receiving Proton versus Photon Craniospinal Irradiation. Cancers (Basel) 2015; 7:407-26. [PMID: 25763928 PMCID: PMC4381265 DOI: 10.3390/cancers7010407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2014] [Revised: 02/18/2015] [Accepted: 02/19/2015] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Children receiving radiotherapy face the probability of a subsequent malignant neoplasm (SMN). In some cases, the predicted SMN risk can be reduced by proton therapy. The purpose of this study was to apply the most comprehensive dose assessment methods to estimate the reduction in SMN risk after proton therapy vs. photon therapy for a 13-year-old girl requiring craniospinal irradiation (CSI). We reconstructed the equivalent dose throughout the patient’s body from therapeutic and stray radiation and applied SMN incidence and mortality risk models for each modality. Excluding skin cancer, the risk of incidence after proton CSI was a third of that of photon CSI. The predicted absolute SMN risks were high. For photon CSI, the SMN incidence rates greater than 10% were for thyroid, non-melanoma skin, lung, colon, stomach, and other solid cancers, and for proton CSI they were non-melanoma skin, lung, and other solid cancers. In each setting, lung cancer accounted for half the risk of mortality. In conclusion, the predicted SMN risk for a 13-year-old girl undergoing proton CSI was reduced vs. photon CSI. This study demonstrates the feasibility of inter-institutional whole-body dose and risk assessments and also serves as a model for including risk estimation in personalized cancer care.
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Starke RM, Yen CP, Chen CJ, Ding D, Mohila CA, Jensen ME, Kassell NF, Sheehan JP. An Updated Assessment of the Risk of Radiation-Induced Neoplasia After Radiosurgery of Arteriovenous Malformations. World Neurosurg 2014; 82:395-401. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2012] [Revised: 09/17/2012] [Accepted: 02/01/2013] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
19
|
Joosten A, Bochud F, Moeckli R. A critical evaluation of secondary cancer risk models applied to Monte Carlo dose distributions of 2-dimensional, 3-dimensional conformal and hybrid intensity-modulated radiation therapy for breast cancer. Phys Med Biol 2014; 59:4697-722. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/16/4697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
20
|
Kim DW, Chung K, Chung WK, Bae SH, Shin DO, Hong S, Park SH, Park SY, Hong CS, Lim YK, Shin D, Lee SB, Lee HH, Sung J, Yoon M. Risk of secondary cancers from scattered radiation during intensity-modulated radiotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9:109. [PMID: 24886163 PMCID: PMC4030012 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-9-109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2013] [Accepted: 03/17/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate and compare the risks of secondary cancers from therapeutic doses received by patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), and tomotherapy (TOMO). METHODS Treatments for five patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were planned using IMRT, VMAT, and TOMO. Based on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII method, the excess relative risk (ERR), excess absolute risk (EAR), and lifetime attributable risk (LAR) were evaluated from therapeutic doses, which were measured using radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeters (RPLGDs) for each organ inside a humanoid phantom. RESULTS The average organ equivalent doses (OEDs) of 5 patients were measured as 0.23, 1.18, 0.91, 0.95, 0.97, 0.24, and 0.20 Gy for the thyroid, lung, stomach, liver, small intestine, prostate (or ovary), and rectum, respectively. From the OED measurements, LAR incidence were calculated as 83, 46, 22, 30, 2 and 6 per 10(4) person for the lung, stomach, normal liver, small intestine, prostate (or ovary), and rectum. CONCLUSIONS We estimated the secondary cancer risks at various organs for patients with HCC who received different treatment modalities. We found that HCC treatment is associated with a high secondary cancer risk in the lung and stomach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Myonggeun Yoon
- Department of Radiological Science, College of Health Science, Korea University, Jeongneung 3-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dionisi F, Widesott L, Lorentini S, Amichetti M. Is there a role for proton therapy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma? A systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2014; 111:1-10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2013] [Revised: 01/28/2014] [Accepted: 02/02/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
22
|
Taddei PJ, Jalbout W, Howell RM, Khater N, Geara F, Homann K, Newhauser WD. Analytical model for out-of-field dose in photon craniospinal irradiation. Phys Med Biol 2013; 58:7463-79. [PMID: 24099782 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/21/7463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The prediction of late effects after radiotherapy in organs outside a treatment field requires accurate estimations of out-of-field dose. However, out-of-field dose is not calculated accurately by commercial treatment planning systems (TPSs). The purpose of this study was to develop and test an analytical model for out-of-field dose during craniospinal irradiation (CSI) from photon beams produced by a linear accelerator. In two separate evaluations of the model, we measured absorbed dose for a 6 MV CSI using thermoluminescent dosimeters placed throughout an anthropomorphic phantom and fit the measured data to an analytical model of absorbed dose versus distance outside of the composite field edge. These measurements were performed in two separate clinics-the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MD Anderson) and the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC)-using the same phantom but different linear accelerators and TPSs commissioned for patient treatments. The measurement at AUBMC also included in-field locations. Measured dose values were compared to those predicted by TPSs and parameters were fit to the model in each setting. In each clinic, 95% of the measured data were contained within a factor of 0.2 and one root mean square deviation of the model-based values. The root mean square deviations of the mathematical model were 0.91 cGy Gy(-1) and 1.67 cGy Gy(-1) in the MD Anderson and AUBMC clinics, respectively. The TPS predictions agreed poorly with measurements in regions of sharp dose gradient, e.g., near the field edge. At distances greater than 1 cm from the field edge, the TPS underestimated the dose by an average of 14% ± 24% and 44% ± 19% in the MD Anderson and AUBMC clinics, respectively. The in-field measured dose values of the measurement at AUBMC matched the dose values calculated by the TPS to within 2%. Dose algorithms in TPSs systematically underestimated the actual out-of-field dose. Therefore, it is important to use an improved model based on measurements when estimating out-of-field dose. The model proposed in this study performed well for this purpose in two clinics and may be applicable in other clinics with similar treatment field configurations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillip J Taddei
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Krausch M, Raffel A, Anlauf M, Schott M, Lehwald N, Krieg A, Kröpil F, Cupisti K, Knoefel WT. Secondary malignancy in patients with sporadic neuroendocrine neoplasia. Endocrine 2013; 44:510-6. [PMID: 23494366 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-013-9911-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2012] [Accepted: 02/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasias (NENs), especially of the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP), system relatively increased over the past decades, as a result of advanced diagnostic tools, a better clinical awareness, and distinguished pathological diagnostic recognition. Previous reports hypothesized an increased risk for secondary malignancies in patients with NEN especially in GEP-NENs. The present study was designed to investigate the coincidence of NENs and secondary malignancies in a large patient collective. A retrospective analysis was performed on 161 patients (85 female and 76 male) with NEN of various origins. Clinical data of these patients, different classification systems (TNM/WHO), proliferations-based grading, and clinical follow-up were collected and analyzed. Out of 143 patients with a sporadic NEN, 15 (10.49 %) patients were identified with secondary malignant tumors. Median age at the time of the primary operation for NEN was 65 years, whereas the median age of initial diagnosis of associated tumors was 59 years. Mean follow-up time was 61 months. The risk of developing a secondary malignancy was most elevated for patients with an NEN of the lung, the stomach, and the ileum (60, 50 and 20 %, respectively). The spectrum of secondary malignancies included various types of cancer. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis shows a difference suggesting that patients with a secondary malignancy demonstrate a worse survival compared to patients without a secondary tumor; no significance was detected (p = 0.349). Our data suggest that secondary malignancies in patients with NEN's especially in GEP-NENs are found more frequently than in general population. Therefore, patients with NEN need a continuous and detailed follow-up. The reason for the increased incidence of secondary malignancies in patients with NENs remains to be elucidated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Krausch
- Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ghosh S, Kumar A, Tripathi RP, Chandna S. Connexin-43 regulates p38-mediated cell migration and invasion induced selectively in tumour cells by low doses of γ-radiation in an ERK-1/2-independent manner. Carcinogenesis 2013; 35:383-95. [PMID: 24045413 DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgt303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy exposes certain regions of solid tumours to low sublethal doses of γ-radiation that may cause secondary malignancies. Therefore, evaluating low-dose-γ-radiation-induced alterations in tumorigenic potential and understanding their mechanisms could help in improving radiotherapy outcome. Limited studies have indicated connexin (Cx) up-regulation by low doses, whereas Cxs are independently shown to alter cell migration in unirradiated cells. We investigated low-dose-γ-radiation-induced alterations in Cx43 expression and cell proliferation/migration/invasion in various tumour cell lines, along with the putative molecular pathways such as p38 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 (ERK-1/2)-mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). Interestingly, a narrow range of low doses (10-20 cGy) enhanced Cx43 expression and also selectively induced glioma cell migration without altering cell proliferation, accompanied by sustained activation of p38 and up-regulation of p21(waf1/cip1), whereas the lowest (5 cGy) dose induced cell proliferation coupled with enhanced p-ERK1/2, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and p-H3 levels without inducing cell migration. Most importantly, low-dose-γ-radiation-induced cell migration and p38 activation was strongly inhibited by knocking down Cx43 expression, thereby demonstrating latter's upstream role, whereas the knock-down had no effect on ERK-1/2 or cell proliferation. Silencing Cx43 caused near-complete inhibition of radiation-induced cell migration/invasion in all tumour cell lines (U87, BMG-1, A549 and HeLa), whereas no cell migration/invasiveness was induced in the γ-irradiated primary VH10 or transformed AA8 fibroblasts. Our study demonstrates for the first time that low-dose γ-radiation induces p38-MAPK mediated cell migration selectively in tumour cells. Further, this effect is regulated by Cx43, which could thus be an important mediator in radiation-induced secondary malignancies and/or metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soma Ghosh
- Natural Radiation Response Mechanisms Group, Division of Radiation Biosciences with
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhang R, Howell RM, Homann K, Giebeler A, Taddei PJ, Mahajan A, Newhauser WD. Predicted risks of radiogenic cardiac toxicity in two pediatric patients undergoing photon or proton radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2013; 8:184. [PMID: 23880421 PMCID: PMC3751146 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-8-184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2013] [Accepted: 07/21/2013] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Hodgkin disease (HD) and medulloblastoma (MB) are common malignancies found in children and young adults, and radiotherapy is part of the standard treatment. It was reported that these patients who received radiation therapy have an increased risk of cardiovascular late effects. We compared the predicted risk of developing radiogenic cardiac toxicity after photon versus proton radiotherapies for a pediatric patient with HD and a pediatric patient with MB. Methods In the treatment plans, each patient’s heart was contoured in fine detail, including substructures of the pericardium and myocardium. Risk calculations took into account both therapeutic and stray radiation doses. We calculated the relative risk (RR) of cardiac toxicity using a linear risk model and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) values using relative seriality and Lyman models. Uncertainty analyses were also performed. Results The RR values of cardiac toxicity for the HD patient were 7.27 (proton) and 8.37 (photon), respectively; the RR values for the MB patient were 1.28 (proton) and 8.39 (photon), respectively. The predicted NTCP values for the HD patient were 2.17% (proton) and 2.67% (photon) for the myocardium, and were 2.11% (proton) and 1.92% (photon) for the whole heart. The predicted ratios of NTCP values (proton/photon) for the MB patient were much less than unity. Uncertainty analyses revealed that the predicted ratio of risk between proton and photon therapies was sensitive to uncertainties in the NTCP model parameters and the mean radiation weighting factor for neutrons, but was not sensitive to heart structure contours. The qualitative findings of the study were not sensitive to uncertainties in these factors. Conclusions We conclude that proton and photon radiotherapies confer similar predicted risks of cardiac toxicity for the HD patient in this study, and that proton therapy reduced the predicted risk for the MB patient in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Zhang
- The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Berrington de Gonzalez A, Gilbert E, Curtis R, Inskip P, Kleinerman R, Morton L, Rajaraman P, Little MP. Second solid cancers after radiation therapy: a systematic review of the epidemiologic studies of the radiation dose-response relationship. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 86:224-33. [PMID: 23102695 PMCID: PMC3816386 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 202] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2012] [Revised: 08/30/2012] [Accepted: 09/01/2012] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Rapid innovations in radiation therapy techniques have resulted in an urgent need for risk projection models for second cancer risks from high-dose radiation exposure, because direct observation of the late effects of newer treatments will require patient follow-up for a decade or more. However, the patterns of cancer risk after fractionated high-dose radiation are much less well understood than those after lower-dose exposures (0.1-5 Gy). In particular, there is uncertainty about the shape of the dose-response curve at high doses and about the magnitude of the second cancer risk per unit dose. We reviewed the available evidence from epidemiologic studies of second solid cancers in organs that received high-dose exposure (>5 Gy) from radiation therapy where dose-response curves were estimated from individual organ-specific doses. We included 28 eligible studies with 3434 second cancer patients across 11 second solid cancers. Overall, there was little evidence that the dose-response curve was nonlinear in the direction of a downturn in risk, even at organ doses of ≥60 Gy. Thyroid cancer was the only exception, with evidence of a downturn after 20 Gy. Generally the excess relative risk per Gray, taking account of age and sex, was 5 to 10 times lower than the risk from acute exposures of <2 Gy among the Japanese atomic bomb survivors. However, the magnitude of the reduction in risk varied according to the second cancer. The results of our review provide insights into radiation carcinogenesis from fractionated high-dose exposures and are generally consistent with current theoretical models. The results can be used to refine the development of second solid cancer risk projection models for novel radiation therapy techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Buchsbaum JC, Besemer A, Simmons J, Hoene T, Simoneaux V, Sandefur A, Wolanski M, Li Z, Cheng CW. Supine proton beam craniospinal radiotherapy using a novel tabletop adapter. Med Dosim 2013; 38:70-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2012.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2011] [Revised: 05/31/2012] [Accepted: 07/23/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
28
|
Kumar S. Second malignant neoplasms following radiotherapy. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2012; 9:4744-59. [PMID: 23249860 PMCID: PMC3546788 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph9124744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2012] [Revised: 12/06/2012] [Accepted: 12/06/2012] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
More than half of all cancer patients receive radiotherapy as a part of their treatment. With the increasing number of long-term cancer survivors, there is a growing concern about the risk of radiation induced second malignant neoplasm [SMN]. This risk appears to be highest for survivors of childhood cancers. The exact mechanism and dose-response relationship for radiation induced malignancy is not well understood, however, there have been growing efforts to develop strategies for the prevention and mitigation of radiation induced cancers. This review article focuses on the incidence, etiology, and risk factors for SMN in various organs after radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanath Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rechner LA, Howell RM, Zhang R, Newhauser WD. Impact of margin size on the predicted risk of radiogenic second cancers following proton arc therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer. Phys Med Biol 2012; 57:N469-79. [PMID: 23154795 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/23/n469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
We previously determined that the predicted risk of radiogenic second cancer in the bladder and rectum after proton arc therapy (PAT) was less than or equal to that after volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with photons, but we did not consider the impact of margin size on that risk. The current study was thus conducted to evaluate margin size's effect on the predicted risks of second cancer for the two modalities and the relative risk between them. Seven treatment plans with margins ranging from 0 mm in all directions to 6 mm posteriorly and 8 mm in all other directions were considered for both modalities. We performed risk analyses using three risk models with varying amounts of cell sterilization and calculated ratios of risk for the corresponding PAT and VMAT plans. We found that the change in risk with margin size depended on the risk model but that the relative risk remained nearly constant with margin size, regardless of the amount of cell sterilization modeled. We conclude that while margin size influences the predicted risk of a second cancer for a given modality, it appears to affect both modalities in roughly equal proportions so that the relative risk between PAT and VMAT is approximately equivalent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Rechner
- Department of Radiation Physics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Khan HA, Alhomida AS. A review of the logistic role of L-carnitine in the management of radiation toxicity and radiotherapy side effects. J Appl Toxicol 2011; 31:707-13. [PMID: 21818761 DOI: 10.1002/jat.1716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2011] [Revised: 06/10/2011] [Accepted: 06/10/2011] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Radiation therapy is a key modality in the treatment of different cancer types. Fatigue is the most common side effect of radiotherapy, while others include nausea, hair loss, skin irritation, anemia, infertility, cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment and even the development of second cancers. Studies in experimental animals have shown protective effects of carnitine against exposure of various organs to ionizing radiation, whereas carnitine deficiency is known to enhance radiation-induced toxicity. This report summarizes the recent literature on the adverse effects of radiotherapy and the impact of radiation on carnitine homeostasis. Although some studies have demonstrated the prophylactic benefits of carnitine against the toxic effects of chemotherapy, the role of carnitine in the prognosis and management of cancer patients receiving radiotherapy is not clear and needs to be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haseeb Ahmad Khan
- Department of Biochemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Historically, the use of external-beam radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been limited by toxicity to the uninvolved liver and surrounding structures. Advances in photon radiotherapy have improved dose conformality to the tumor and facilitated dose escalation, a key contributor to improved HCC radiation treatment outcomes. However, despite these advances in photon radiotherapy, significant volumes of liver still receive low doses of radiation that can preclude dose escalation, particularly in patients with limited functional liver reserves. By capitalizing on the lack of exit dose along the beam path beyond the tumor and higher biological effectiveness, charged-particle therapy offers the promise of maximizing tumor control via dose escalation without excessive liver toxicity. In this review, we discuss the distinctive biophysical attributes of both proton and carbon ion radiotherapy, particularly as they pertain to treatment of HCC. We also review the available literature regarding clinical outcomes and the toxicity of using charged particles for the treatment of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heath D. Skinner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Theodore S. Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ren ZG, Zhao JD, Gu K, Wang J, Jiang GL. Hepatic proliferation after partial liver irradiation in Sprague-Dawley rats. Mol Biol Rep 2011; 39:3829-36. [PMID: 21766183 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-011-1161-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2011] [Accepted: 06/30/2011] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
The liver has powerful capability to proliferate in response to various injuries, but little is known as to liver proliferation after irradiation (IR) injury. This study investigated whether liver proliferation could be stimulated in low-dose irradiated liver by partial liver IR injury with high dose radiation. Sprague-Dawley rats were irradiated by 6-MV X-ray with single dose of 25 Gy to the right-half liver, while the left-half liver was shielded (0.7 Gy) or irradiated with single doses of 3.2, 5.6, and 8.0 Gy, respectively. Hepatic proliferation in the shielded and low-dose irradiated left-half liver was evaluated by serum hepatic growth factor (HGF), proliferating cell nuclei antigen (PCNA), liver proliferation index (PI), hepatocyte mitosis index (MI). The observation time was 0 day (before IR), 30, 60, 90, and 120 days after IR. Our results showed that serum HGF and hepatocyte HGF mRNA increased after IR with HGF mRNA peak on day 30 in the shielded and low-dose irradiated left-half livers, and their values increased as the dose increased to the left-half liver. Liver PI and PCNA mRNA peaked on day 60 with stronger expressions in higher doses-irradiated livers. MI increased after IR, with the peak noted on day 60 in the shielded and on day 90 in the low-dose irradiated left-half livers. There was a 30 day delay between MI peaks in the shielded and low-dose irradiated livers. In conclusion, 25 Gy partial liver IR injury could stimulate the shielded liver and low-dose irradiated liver to proliferate. In the livers receiving a dose range of 3.2-8.0 Gy, the proliferation was stronger in higher doses-irradiated liver than the low-dose irradiated. However, IR delayed hepatocyte mitosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Gang Ren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Recent advances in radiotherapy have enabled the use of different types of particles, such as protons and heavy ions, as well as refinements to the treatment of tumours with standard sources (photons). However, the risk of second cancers arising in long-term survivors continues to be a problem. The long-term risks from treatments such as particle therapy have not yet been determined and are unlikely to become apparent for many years. Therefore, there is a need to develop risk assessments based on our current knowledge of radiation-induced carcinogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wayne D Newhauser
- MD Anderson Cancer Center Radiation Oncology, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard Houston, Texas 77030-4009, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Howell RM, Scarboro SB, Taddei PJ, Krishnan S, Kry SF, Newhauser WD. Methodology for determining doses to in-field, out-of-field and partially in-field organs for late effects studies in photon radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55:7009-23. [PMID: 21076193 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/23/s04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
An important but little examined aspect of radiation dosimetry studies involving organs outside the treatment field is how to assess dose to organs that are partially within a treatment field; this question is particularly important for studies intended to measure total absorbed dose in order to predict the risk of radiogenic late effects, such as second cancers. The purpose of this investigation was therefore to establish a method to categorize organs as in-field, out-of-field or partially in-field that would be applicable to both conventional and modern radiotherapy techniques. In this study, we defined guidelines to categorize the organs based on isodose inclusion criteria, developed methods to assess doses to partially in-field organs, and then tested the methods by applying them to a case of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma based on actual patient data. For partially in-field organs, we recommend performing a sensitivity test to determine whether potential inaccuracies in low-dose regions of the DVH (from the treatment planning system) have a substantial effect on the mean organ dose, i.e. >5%. In such cases, we suggest supplementing calculated DVH data with measured dosimetric data using a volume-weighting technique to determine the mean dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca M Howell
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|