1
|
Ahmed M, Bicher S, Combs SE, Lindner R, Raulefs S, Schmid TE, Spasova S, Stolz J, Wilkens JJ, Winter J, Bartzsch S. In Vivo Microbeam Radiation Therapy at a Conventional Small Animal Irradiator. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:581. [PMID: 38339332 PMCID: PMC11154279 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is a still pre-clinical form of spatially fractionated radiotherapy, which uses an array of micrometer-wide, planar beams of X-ray radiation. The dose modulation in MRT has proven effective in the treatment of tumors while being well tolerated by normal tissue. Research on understanding the underlying biological mechanisms mostly requires large third-generation synchrotrons. In this study, we aimed to develop a preclinical treatment environment that would allow MRT independent of synchrotrons. We built a compact microbeam setup for pre-clinical experiments within a small animal irradiator and present in vivo MRT application, including treatment planning, dosimetry, and animal positioning. The brain of an immobilized mouse was treated with MRT, excised, and immunohistochemically stained against γH2AX for DNA double-strand breaks. We developed a comprehensive treatment planning system by adjusting an existing dose calculation algorithm to our setup and attaching it to the open-source software 3D-Slicer. Predicted doses in treatment planning agreed within 10% with film dosimetry readings. We demonstrated the feasibility of MRT exposures in vivo at a compact source and showed that the microbeam pattern is observable in histological sections of a mouse brain. The platform developed in this study will be used for pre-clinical research of MRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mabroor Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (M.A.); (S.B.); (S.E.C.); (S.R.); (T.E.S.); (S.S.); (J.S.); (J.J.W.); (J.W.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Medicine, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany;
- Department of Physics, School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - Sandra Bicher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (M.A.); (S.B.); (S.E.C.); (S.R.); (T.E.S.); (S.S.); (J.S.); (J.J.W.); (J.W.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Medicine, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany;
| | - Stephanie Elisabeth Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (M.A.); (S.B.); (S.E.C.); (S.R.); (T.E.S.); (S.S.); (J.S.); (J.J.W.); (J.W.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Medicine, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany;
| | - Rainer Lindner
- Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Medicine, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany;
| | - Susanne Raulefs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (M.A.); (S.B.); (S.E.C.); (S.R.); (T.E.S.); (S.S.); (J.S.); (J.J.W.); (J.W.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Medicine, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany;
| | - Thomas E. Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (M.A.); (S.B.); (S.E.C.); (S.R.); (T.E.S.); (S.S.); (J.S.); (J.J.W.); (J.W.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Medicine, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany;
| | - Suzana Spasova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (M.A.); (S.B.); (S.E.C.); (S.R.); (T.E.S.); (S.S.); (J.S.); (J.J.W.); (J.W.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Medicine, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany;
- Department of Physics, School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - Jessica Stolz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (M.A.); (S.B.); (S.E.C.); (S.R.); (T.E.S.); (S.S.); (J.S.); (J.J.W.); (J.W.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Medicine, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany;
| | - Jan Jakob Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (M.A.); (S.B.); (S.E.C.); (S.R.); (T.E.S.); (S.S.); (J.S.); (J.J.W.); (J.W.)
- Department of Physics, School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - Johanna Winter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (M.A.); (S.B.); (S.E.C.); (S.R.); (T.E.S.); (S.S.); (J.S.); (J.J.W.); (J.W.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Medicine, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany;
- Department of Physics, School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany
- Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (MLZ), 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; (M.A.); (S.B.); (S.E.C.); (S.R.); (T.E.S.); (S.S.); (J.S.); (J.J.W.); (J.W.)
- Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Medicine, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany;
- Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (MLZ), 85748 Garching, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mentzel F, Kroninger K, Lerch M, Nackenhorst O, Paino J, Rosenfeld A, Saraswati A, Tsoi AC, Weingarten J, Hagenbuchner M, Guatelli S. Fast and accurate dose predictions for novel radiotherapy treatments in heterogeneous phantoms using conditional 3D‐UNet generative adversarial networks. Med Phys 2022; 49:3389-3404. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.15555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Mentzel
- Department of Physics TU Dortmund University Dortmund 44225 Germany
| | - Kevin Kroninger
- Department of Physics TU Dortmund University Dortmund 44225 Germany
| | - Michael Lerch
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics University of Wollongong Wollongong NSW 2522 Australia
- Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute University of Wollongong Wollongong NSW 2522 Australia
| | - Olaf Nackenhorst
- Department of Physics TU Dortmund University Dortmund 44225 Germany
| | - Jason Paino
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics University of Wollongong Wollongong NSW 2522 Australia
- Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute University of Wollongong Wollongong NSW 2522 Australia
| | - Anatoly Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics University of Wollongong Wollongong NSW 2522 Australia
- Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute University of Wollongong Wollongong NSW 2522 Australia
| | - Ayu Saraswati
- School of Computing and Information Technology University of Wollongong Wollongong NSW 2522 Australia
| | - Ah Chung Tsoi
- School of Computing and Information Technology University of Wollongong Wollongong NSW 2522 Australia
| | - Jens Weingarten
- Department of Physics TU Dortmund University Dortmund 44225 Germany
| | - Markus Hagenbuchner
- School of Computing and Information Technology University of Wollongong Wollongong NSW 2522 Australia
| | - Susanna Guatelli
- Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute University of Wollongong Wollongong NSW 2522 Australia
- School of Computing and Information Technology University of Wollongong Wollongong NSW 2522 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alfuraih AA. Simulation of Gamma-Ray Transmission Buildup Factors for Stratified Spherical Layers. Dose Response 2022; 20:15593258211068625. [PMID: 35197813 PMCID: PMC8859677 DOI: 10.1177/15593258211070911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Deterministic particle transport codes usually take into account scattered photons with correct attenuation laws and application of buildup factor to incident beam. Transmission buildup factors for adipose, bone, muscle, and skin human tissues, as well as for various combinations of these media for point isotropic photon source with energies of .15, 1.5 and 15 MeV, for different thickness of layers, were carried out using Geant4 (version 10.5) simulation toolkit. Also, we performed the analysis of existing multilayered shield fitting models (Lin and Jiang, Kalos, Burke and Beck) of buildup factor and the proposition of a new model. We found that the model combining those of Burke and Beck, for low atomic number (Z) followed by high Z materials and Kalos 1 for high Z followed by low Z materials, accurately reproduces simulation results with approximated deviation of 3 ± 3%, 2 ± 2%, and 3 ± 2% for 2, 3, and 4 layers, respectively. Since buildup factors are the key parameter for point kernel calculations, a correct study can be of great interest to the large community of radiation physicists, in general, and to medical imaging and radiotreatment physicists, especially.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulrahman A. Alfuraih
- Department of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wright MD, Romanelli P, Bravin A, Le Duc G, Brauer-Krisch E, Requardt H, Bartzsch S, Hlushchuk R, Laissue JA, Djonov V. Non-conventional Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Microbeam Radiotherapy Provides Superior Normal Tissue Sparing in Rat Lung Compared to Non-conventional Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy. Cureus 2021; 13:e19317. [PMID: 35223216 PMCID: PMC8864723 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Conventional radiotherapy is a widely used non-invasive form of treatment for many types of cancer. However, due to a low threshold in the lung for radiation-induced normal tissue damage, it is of less utility in treating lung cancer. For this reason, surgery is the preferred treatment for lung cancer, which has the detriment of being highly invasive. Non-conventional ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy is currently of great interest in the radiotherapy community due to demonstrations of reduced normal tissue toxicity in lung and other anatomy. This study investigates the effects of FLASH microbeam radiotherapy, which in addition to ultra-high dose rate incorporates a spatial segmentation of the radiation field, on the normal lung tissue of rats. With a focus on fibrotic damage, this work demonstrates that FLASH microbeam radiotherapy provides an order of magnitude increase in normal tissue radio-resistance compared to FLASH radiotherapy. This result suggests FLASH microbeam radiotherapy holds promise for much improved non-invasive control of lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Wright
- Ginzton Technology Center, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, USA.,Research & Development Center, Avail Medical Devices, Roseville, USA
| | | | - Alberto Bravin
- Biomedical Beamline, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, FRA
| | - Geraldine Le Duc
- Biomedical Beamline, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, FRA.,Pharmaceutics, NH TherAguix, Lyon, FRA
| | - Elke Brauer-Krisch
- Biomedical Beamline, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, FRA
| | - Herwig Requardt
- Biomedical Beamline, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, FRA
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, DEU.,Institute for Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Centre Munich, Munich, DEU
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ip WY, Yeung FK, Yung SPF, Yu HCJ, So TH, Vardhanabhuti V. Current landscape and potential future applications of artificial intelligence in medical physics and radiotherapy. Artif Intell Med Imaging 2021; 2:37-55. [DOI: 10.35711/aimi.v2.i2.37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has seen tremendous growth over the past decade and stands to disrupts the medical industry. In medicine, this has been applied in medical imaging and other digitised medical disciplines, but in more traditional fields like medical physics, the adoption of AI is still at an early stage. Though AI is anticipated to be better than human in certain tasks, with the rapid growth of AI, there is increasing concerns for its usage. The focus of this paper is on the current landscape and potential future applications of artificial intelligence in medical physics and radiotherapy. Topics on AI for image acquisition, image segmentation, treatment delivery, quality assurance and outcome prediction will be explored as well as the interaction between human and AI. This will give insights into how we should approach and use the technology for enhancing the quality of clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wing-Yan Ip
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Fu-Ki Yeung
- Medical Physics and Research Department, The Hong Kong Sanitorium & Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Shang-Peng Felix Yung
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | | | - Tsz-Him So
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Varut Vardhanabhuti
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Day LRJ, Donzelli M, Pellicioli P, Smyth LML, Barnes M, Bartzsch S, Crosbie JC. A commercial treatment planning system with a hybrid dose calculation algorithm for synchrotron radiotherapy trials. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:055016. [PMID: 33373979 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abd737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Synchrotron Radiotherapy (SyncRT) is a preclinical radiation treatment which delivers synchrotron x-rays to cancer targets. SyncRT allows for novel treatments such as Microbeam Radiotherapy, which has been shown to have exceptional healthy tissue sparing capabilities while maintaining good tumour control. Veterinary trials in SyncRT are anticipated to take place in the near future at the Australian Synchrotron's Imaging and Medical Beamline (IMBL). However, before veterinary trials can commence, a computerised treatment planning system (TPS) is required, which can quickly and accurately calculate the synchrotron x-ray dose through patient CT images. Furthermore, SyncRT TPS's must be familiar and intuitive to radiotherapy planners in order to alleviate necessary training and reduce user error. We have paired an accurate and fast Monte Carlo (MC) based SyncRT dose calculation algorithm with EclipseTM, the most widely implemented commercial TPS in the clinic. Using EclipseTM, we have performed preliminary SyncRT trials on dog cadavers at the IMBL, and verified calculated doses against dosimetric measurement to within 5% for heterogeneous tissue-equivalent phantoms. We have also performed a validation of the TPS against a full MC simulation for constructed heterogeneous phantoms in EclipseTM, and showed good agreement for a range of water-like tissues to within 5%-8%. Our custom EclipseTM TPS for SyncRT is ready to perform live veterinary trials at the IMBL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L R J Day
- School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - M Donzelli
- The European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, ID17 Biomedical Beamline, Grenoble, France.,Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - P Pellicioli
- The European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, ID17 Biomedical Beamline, Grenoble, France.,Inserm UA7 STROBE, Grenoble Alps University, Grenoble, France.,Swansea University Medical School, Singleton Park, Swansea, United Kingdom
| | - L M L Smyth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - M Barnes
- School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.,Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,The Australian Synchrotron, Imaging and Medical Beamline, Melbourne, Australia
| | - S Bartzsch
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.,Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J C Crosbie
- School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Day LRJ, Pellicioli P, Gagliardi F, Barnes M, Smyth LML, Butler D, Livingstone J, Stevenson AW, Lye J, Poole CM, Hausermann D, Rogers PAW, Crosbie JC. A Monte Carlo model of synchrotron radiotherapy shows good agreement with experimental dosimetry measurements: Data from the imaging and medical beamline at the Australian Synchrotron. Phys Med 2020; 77:64-74. [PMID: 32791426 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Experimental measurement of Synchrotron Radiotherapy (SyncRT) doses is challenging, especially for Microbeam Radiotherapy (MRT), which is characterised by very high dynamic ranges with spatial resolutions on the micrometer scale. Monte Carlo (MC) simulation is considered a gold standard for accurate dose calculation in radiotherapy, and is therefore routinely relied upon to produce verification data. We present a MC model for Australian Synchrotron's Imaging and Medical Beamline (IMBL), which is capable of generating accurate dosimetry data to inform and/or verify SyncRT experiments. Our MC model showed excellent agreement with dosimetric measurement for Synchrotron Broadbeam Radiotherapy (SBBR). Our MC model is also the first to achieve validation for MRT, using two methods of dosimetry, to within clinical tolerances of 5% for a 20×20 mm2 field size, except for surface measurements at 5 mm depth, which remained to within good agreement of 7.5%. Our experimental methodology has allowed us to control measurement uncertainties for MRT doses to within 5-6%, which has also not been previously achieved, and provides a confidence which until now has been lacking in MRT validation studies. The MC model is suitable for SyncRT dose calculation of clinically relevant field sizes at the IMBL, and can be extended to include medical beamlines at other Synchrotron facilities as well. The presented MC model will be used as a validation tool for treatment planning dose calculation algorithms, and is an important step towards veterinary SyncRT trials at the Australian Synchrotron.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L R J Day
- School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - P Pellicioli
- The European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, ID17 Biomedical Beamline, Grenoble, France; Inserm UA7 STROBE, Grenoble Alps University, Grenoble, France; Swansea University Medical School, Singleton Park, Swansea, United Kingdom
| | - F Gagliardi
- Radiation Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - M Barnes
- Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Australian Synchrotron, Clayton, Australia
| | - L M L Smyth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - D Butler
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), Melbourne, Australia
| | - J Livingstone
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Australian Synchrotron, Clayton, Australia
| | - A W Stevenson
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Australian Synchrotron, Clayton, Australia
| | - J Lye
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), Melbourne, Australia
| | - C M Poole
- Radiation Analytics, Brisbane, Australia
| | - D Hausermann
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Australian Synchrotron, Clayton, Australia
| | - P A W Rogers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - J C Crosbie
- School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Siddique S, Chow JC. Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:656-666. [PMID: 32617080 PMCID: PMC7321818 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has already been implemented widely in the medical field in the recent years. This paper first reviews the background of AI and radiotherapy. Then it explores the basic concepts of different AI algorithms and machine learning methods, such as neural networks, that are available to us today and how they are being implemented in radiotherapy and diagnostic processes, such as medical imaging, treatment planning, patient simulation, quality assurance and radiation dose delivery. It also explores the ongoing research on AI methods that are to be implemented in radiotherapy in the future. The review shows very promising progress and future for AI to be widely used in various areas of radiotherapy. However, basing on various concerns such as availability and security of using big data, and further work on polishing and testing AI algorithms, it is found that we may not ready to use AI primarily in radiotherapy at the moment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarkar Siddique
- Department of Physics, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
| | - James C.L. Chow
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 1X6, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bartzsch S, Corde S, Crosbie JC, Day L, Donzelli M, Krisch M, Lerch M, Pellicioli P, Smyth LML, Tehei M. Technical advances in x-ray microbeam radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:02TR01. [PMID: 31694009 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab5507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
In the last 25 years microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional radiation therapy at large, third generation synchrotrons. In MRT, a multi-slit collimator modulates a kilovoltage x-ray beam on a micrometer scale, creating peak dose areas with unconventionally high doses of several hundred Grays separated by low dose valley regions, where the dose remains well below the tissue tolerance level. Pre-clinical evidence demonstrates that such beam geometries lead to substantially reduced damage to normal tissue at equal tumour control rates and hence drastically increase the therapeutic window. Although the mechanisms behind MRT are still to be elucidated, previous studies indicate that immune response, tumour microenvironment, and the microvasculature may play a crucial role. Beyond tumour therapy, MRT has also been suggested as a microsurgical tool in neurological disorders and as a primer for drug delivery. The physical properties of MRT demand innovative medical physics and engineering solutions for safe treatment delivery. This article reviews technical developments in MRT and discusses existing solutions for dosimetric validation, reliable treatment planning and safety. Instrumentation at synchrotron facilities, including beam production, collimators and patient positioning systems, is also discussed. Specific solutions reviewed in this article include: dosimetry techniques that can cope with high spatial resolution, low photon energies and extremely high dose rates of up to 15 000 Gy s-1, dose calculation algorithms-apart from pure Monte Carlo Simulations-to overcome the challenge of small voxel sizes and a wide dynamic dose-range, and the use of dose-enhancing nanoparticles to combat the limited penetrability of a kilovoltage energy spectrum. Finally, concepts for alternative compact microbeam sources are presented, such as inverse Compton scattering set-ups and carbon nanotube x-ray tubes, that may facilitate the transfer of MRT into a hospital-based clinical environment. Intensive research in recent years has resulted in practical solutions to most of the technical challenges in MRT. Treatment planning, dosimetry and patient safety systems at synchrotrons have matured to a point that first veterinary and clinical studies in MRT are within reach. Should these studies confirm the promising results of pre-clinical studies, the authors are confident that MRT will become an effective new radiotherapy option for certain patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany. Helmholtz Centre Munich, Institute for Radiation Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Donzelli M, Bräuer-Krisch E, Oelfke U, Wilkens JJ, Bartzsch S. Hybrid dose calculation: a dose calculation algorithm for microbeam radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:045013. [PMID: 29324439 PMCID: PMC5964549 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaa705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2017] [Revised: 12/07/2017] [Accepted: 01/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is still a preclinical approach in radiation oncology that uses planar micrometre wide beamlets with extremely high peak doses, separated by a few hundred micrometre wide low dose regions. Abundant preclinical evidence demonstrates that MRT spares normal tissue more effectively than conventional radiation therapy, at equivalent tumour control. In order to launch first clinical trials, accurate and efficient dose calculation methods are an inevitable prerequisite. In this work a hybrid dose calculation approach is presented that is based on a combination of Monte Carlo and kernel based dose calculation. In various examples the performance of the algorithm is compared to purely Monte Carlo and purely kernel based dose calculations. The accuracy of the developed algorithm is comparable to conventional pure Monte Carlo calculations. In particular for inhomogeneous materials the hybrid dose calculation algorithm out-performs purely convolution based dose calculation approaches. It is demonstrated that the hybrid algorithm can efficiently calculate even complicated pencil beam and cross firing beam geometries. The required calculation times are substantially lower than for pure Monte Carlo calculations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Donzelli
- The European
Synchrotron Radiation Facility, 71 Avenue des Martyrs 38000,
Grenoble, France
- The Institute of
Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London SM2 5NG,
United Kingdom
- Author to whom any correspondence should be
addressed
| | - Elke Bräuer-Krisch
- The European
Synchrotron Radiation Facility, 71 Avenue des Martyrs 38000,
Grenoble, France
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- The Institute of
Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London SM2 5NG,
United Kingdom
| | - Jan J Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts
der Isar, Technical University of
Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich,
Germany
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- The Institute of
Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London SM2 5NG,
United Kingdom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts
der Isar, Technical University of
Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich,
Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fardone E, Pouyatos B, Bräuer-Krisch E, Bartzsch S, Mathieu H, Requardt H, Bucci D, Barbone G, Coan P, Battaglia G, Le Duc G, Bravin A, Romanelli P. Synchrotron-generated microbeams induce hippocampal transections in rats. Sci Rep 2018; 8:184. [PMID: 29317649 PMCID: PMC5760574 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18000-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Synchrotron-generated microplanar beams (microbeams) provide the most stereo-selective irradiation modality known today. This novel irradiation modality has been shown to control seizures originating from eloquent cortex causing no neurological deficit in experimental animals. To test the hypothesis that application of microbeams in the hippocampus, the most common source of refractory seizures, is safe and does not induce severe side effects, we used microbeams to induce transections to the hippocampus of healthy rats. An array of parallel microbeams carrying an incident dose of 600 Gy was delivered to the rat hippocampus. Immunohistochemistry of phosphorylated γ-H2AX showed cell death along the microbeam irradiation paths in rats 48 hours after irradiation. No evident behavioral or neurological deficits were observed during the 3-month period of observation. MR imaging showed no signs of radio-induced edema or radionecrosis 3 months after irradiation. Histological analysis showed a very well preserved hippocampal cytoarchitecture and confirmed the presence of clear-cut microscopic transections across the hippocampus. These data support the use of synchrotron-generated microbeams as a novel tool to slice the hippocampus of living rats in a minimally invasive way, providing (i) a novel experimental model to study hippocampal function and (ii) a new treatment tool for patients affected by refractory epilepsy induced by mesial temporal sclerosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erminia Fardone
- European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), Grenoble, France.,Department of Biological Science and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | - Benoît Pouyatos
- Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Inserm U836, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hervè Mathieu
- Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Inserm U836, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France
| | - Herwig Requardt
- European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), Grenoble, France
| | | | - Giacomo Barbone
- Department of Physics, Ludwig Maximilians University, Garching, Germany
| | - Paola Coan
- Department of Physics, Ludwig Maximilians University, Garching, Germany.,Department of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Geraldine Le Duc
- European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), Grenoble, France
| | - Alberto Bravin
- European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), Grenoble, France
| | - Pantaleo Romanelli
- Brain Radiosurgery, Cyberknife Center, Centro Diagnostico Italiano (CDI), Milano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|