Event-by-event non-rigid data-driven PET respiratory motion correction methods: comparison of principal component analysis and centroid of distribution

Data-driven gated positron emission tomography/computed tomography for radiotherapy

Purpose

Software-based data-driven gated (DDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has replaced hardware-based 4D PET/CT. The purpose of this article was to review DDG PET/CT, which could improve the accuracy of treatment response assessment, tumor motion evaluation, and target tumor contouring with whole-body (WB) PET/CT for radiotherapy (RT).

Material and methods

This review covered the topics of 4D PET/CT with hardware gating, advancements in PET instrumentation, DDG PET, DDG CT, and DDG PET/CT based on a systematic literature review. It included a discussion of the large axial field-of-view (AFOV) PET detector and a review of the clinical results of DDG PET and DDG PET/CT.

Results

DDG PET matched or outperformed 4D PET with hardware gating. DDG CT was more compatible with DDG PET than 4D CT, which required hardware gating. DDG CT could replace 4D CT for RT. DDG PET and DDG CT for DDG PET/CT can be incorporated in a WB PET/CT of less than 15 min scan time on a PET/CT scanner of at least 25 cm AFOV PET detector.

Conclusions

DDG PET/CT could correct the misregistration and tumor motion artifacts in a WB PET/CT and provide the quantitative PET and tumor motion information of a registered PET/CT for RT.

An objective evaluation method for head motion estimation in PET-Motion corrected centroid-of-distribution

Head motion presents a continuing problem in brain PET studies. A wealth of motion correction (MC) algorithms had been proposed in the past, including both hardware-based methods and data-driven methods. However, in most real brain PET studies, in the absence of ground truth or gold standard of motion information, it is challenging to objectively evaluate MC quality. For MC evaluation, image-domain metrics, e.g., standardized uptake value (SUV) change before and after MC are commonly used, but this measure lacks objectivity because 1) other factors, e.g., attenuation correction, scatter correction and parameters used in the reconstruction, will confound MC effectiveness; 2) SUV only reflects final image quality, and it cannot precisely inform when an MC method performed well or poorly during the scan time period; 3) SUV is tracer-dependent and head motion may cause increases or decreases in SUV for different tracers, so evaluating MC effectiveness is complicated. Here, we present a new algorithm, i.e., motion corrected centroid-of-distribution (MCCOD) to perform objective quality control for measured or estimated rigid motion information. MCCOD is a three-dimensional surrogate trace of the center of tracer distribution after performing rigid MC using the existing motion information. MCCOD is used to inform whether the motion information is accurate, using the PET raw data only, i.e., without PET image reconstruction, where inaccurate motion information typically leads to abrupt changes in the MCCOD trace. MCCOD was validated using simulation studies and was tested on real studies acquired from both time-of-flight (TOF) and non-TOF scanners. A deep learning-based brain mask segmentation was implemented, which is shown to be necessary for non-TOF MCCOD generation. MCCOD is shown to be effective in detecting abrupt translation motion errors in slowly varying tracer distribution caused by the motion tracking hardware and can be used to compare different motion estimation methods as well as to improve existing motion information.

Abbreviated scan protocols to capture 18F-FDG kinetics for long axial FOV PET scanners

PURPOSE

Kinetic parameters from dynamic 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging offer complementary insights to the study of disease compared to static clinical imaging. However, dynamic imaging protocols are cumbersome due to the long acquisition time. Long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET scanners (> 70 cm) have two advantages for dynamic imaging over clinical PET scanners with a standard axial field-of-view (SAFOV; 16-30 cm). The large axial coverage enables multi-organ dynamic imaging in a single bed position, and the high sensitivity may enable clinically routine abbreviated dynamic imaging protocols.

METHODS

In this work, we studied two abbreviated protocols using data from a 65-min dynamic 18F-FDG scan: (A) dynamic imaging immediately post-injection (p.i.) for variable durations, and (B) dynamic imaging immediately p.i. for variable durations plus a 1-h p.i. (5-min-long) datapoint. Nine cancer patients were imaged on the Biograph Vision Quadra (Siemens Healthineers). Time-activity curves over the lesions (N = 39) were fitted using the Patlak graphical analysis and a 2-tissue-compartment (2C, k4 = 0) model for variable scan durations (5-60 min). Kinetic parameters from the complete dataset served as the reference. Lesions from all cancers were grouped into low, medium, and high flux groups, and bias and precision of Ki (Patlak) and Ki, K1, k2, and k3 (2C) were calculated for each group.

RESULTS

Using only early dynamic data with the 2C (or Patlak) model, accurate quantification of Ki required at least 50 (or 55) min of dynamic data for low flux lesions, at least 30 (or 40) min for medium flux lesions, and at least 15 (or 20) min for high flux lesions to achieve both 10% bias and precision. The addition of the final (5-min) datapoint allowed for accurate quantification of Ki with a bias and precision of 10% using only 10-15 min of early dynamic data for either model.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic imaging for 10-15 min immediately p.i. followed by a 5-min scan at 1-h p.i can accurately and precisely quantify 18F-FDG on a long axial FOV scanner, potentially allowing for more widespread use of dynamic 18F-FDG imaging.

Perspectives of brain imaging with PET systems

In this partial review and partial attempt at vision of what may be the future of dedicated brain PET scanners, the key implementations of the PET technique, we postulate that we are still on a development path and there is still a lot to be done in order to develop optimal brain imagers. Optimized for particular imaging tasks and protocols, and also mobile, that can be used outside the PET center, in addition to the expected improvements in sensitivity and resolution. For this multi-application concept to be more practical, flexible, adaptable designs are preferred. This task is greatly facilitated by the improved TOF performance that allows for more open, adjustable, limited angular coverage geometries without creating image artifacts. As achieving uniform very high resolution in the whole body is not practical due to technological limits and high costs, hybrid systems using a moderate-resolution total body scanner (such as J-PET) combined with a very high performing brain imager could be a very attractive approach. As well, as using magnification inserts in the total body or long-axial length imagers to visualize selected targets with higher resolution. In addition, multigamma imagers combining PET with Compton imaging should be developed to enable multitracer imaging.

PET respiratory motion correction: quo vadis?

Positron emission tomography (PET) respiratory motion correction has been a subject of great interest for the last twenty years, prompted mainly by the development of multimodality imaging devices such as PET/computed tomography (CT) and PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PET respiratory motion correction involves a number of steps including acquisition synchronization, motion estimation and finally motion correction. The synchronization steps include the use of different external device systems or data driven approaches which have been gaining ground over the last few years. Patient specific or generic motion models using the respiratory synchronized datasets can be subsequently derived and used for correction either in the image space or within the image reconstruction process. Similar overall approaches can be considered and have been proposed for both PET/CT and PET/MRI devices. Certain variations in the case of PET/MRI include the use of MRI specific sequences for the registration of respiratory motion information. The proposed review includes a comprehensive coverage of all these areas of development in field of PET respiratory motion for different multimodality imaging devices and approaches in terms of synchronization, estimation and subsequent motion correction. Finally, a section on perspectives including the potential clinical usage of these approaches is included.

Advances in PET-CT technology: An update

This article reviews the current evolution and future directions in PET-CT technology focusing on three areas: time of flight, image reconstruction, and data-driven gating. Image reconstruction is considered with advances in point spread function modelling, Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction, and artificial intelligence approaches. Data-driven gating is examined with reference to respiratory motion, cardiac motion, and head motion. For each of these technological advancements, theory will be briefly discussed, benefits of their use in routine practice will be detailed and potential future developments will be discussed. Representative clinical cases will be presented, demonstrating the huge opportunities given to the PET community by hardware and software advances in PET technology when it comes to lesion detection, disease characterization, accurate quantitation and quicker scans. Through this review, hospitals are encouraged to embrace, evaluate and appropriately implement the wide range of new PET technologies that are available now or in the near future, for the improvement of patient care.

Motion estimation and correction in SPECT, PET and CT

Patient motion impacts single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET) and X-ray computed tomography (CT) by giving rise to projection data inconsistencies that can manifest as reconstruction artifacts, thereby degrading image quality and compromising accurate image interpretation and quantification. Methods to estimate and correct for patient motion in SPECT, PET and CT have attracted considerable research effort over several decades. The aims of this effort have been two-fold: to estimate relevant motion fields characterizing the various forms of voluntary and involuntary motion; and to apply these motion fields within a modified reconstruction framework to obtain motion-corrected images. The aims of this review are to outline the motion problem in medical imaging and to critically review published methods for estimating and correcting for the relevant motion fields in clinical and preclinical SPECT, PET and CT. Despite many similarities in how motion is handled between these modalities, utility and applications vary based on differences in temporal and spatial resolution. Technical feasibility has been demonstrated in each modality for both rigid and non-rigid motion, but clinical feasibility remains an important target. There is considerable scope for further developments in motion estimation and correction, and particularly in data-driven methods that will aid clinical utility. State-of-the-art machine learning methods may have a unique role to play in this context.

Quantitative PET in the 2020s: a roadmap

Positron emission tomography (PET) plays an increasingly important role in research and clinical applications, catalysed by remarkable technical advances and a growing appreciation of the need for reliable, sensitive biomarkers of human function in health and disease. Over the last 30 years, a large amount of the physics and engineering effort in PET has been motivated by the dominant clinical application during that period, oncology. This has led to important developments such as PET/CT, whole-body PET, 3D PET, accelerated statistical image reconstruction, and time-of-flight PET. Despite impressive improvements in image quality as a result of these advances, the emphasis on static, semi-quantitative 'hot spot' imaging for oncologic applications has meant that the capability of PET to quantify biologically relevant parameters based on tracer kinetics has not been fully exploited. More recent advances, such as PET/MR and total-body PET, have opened up the ability to address a vast range of new research questions, from which a future expansion of applications and radiotracers appears highly likely. Many of these new applications and tracers will, at least initially, require quantitative analyses that more fully exploit the exquisite sensitivity of PET and the tracer principle on which it is based. It is also expected that they will require more sophisticated quantitative analysis methods than those that are currently available. At the same time, artificial intelligence is revolutionizing data analysis and impacting the relationship between the statistical quality of the acquired data and the information we can extract from the data. In this roadmap, leaders of the key sub-disciplines of the field identify the challenges and opportunities to be addressed over the next ten years that will enable PET to realise its full quantitative potential, initially in research laboratories and, ultimately, in clinical practice.

A data-driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time-of-flight weighted positron emission particle tracking

Purpose

Respiratory motion of patients during positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging affects both image quality and quantitative accuracy. Hardware‐based motion estimation, which is the current clinical standard, requires initial setup, maintenance, and calibration of the equipment, and can be associated with patient discomfort. Data‐driven techniques are an active area of research with limited exploration into lesion‐specific motion estimation. This paper introduces a time‐of‐flight (TOF)‐weighted positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) algorithm that facilitates lesion‐specific respiratory motion estimation from raw listmode PET data.

Methods

The TOF‐PEPT algorithm was implemented and investigated under different scenarios: (a) a phantom study with a point source and an Anzai band for respiratory motion tracking; (b) a phantom study with a point source only, no Anzai band; (c) two clinical studies with point sources and the Anzai band; (d) two clinical studies with point sources only, no Anzai band; and (e) two clinical studies using lesions/internal regions instead of point sources and no Anzai band. For studies with radioactive point sources, they were placed on patients during PET/CT imaging. The motion tracking was performed using a preselected region of interest (ROI), manually drawn around point sources or lesions on reconstructed images. The extracted motion signals were compared with the Anzai band when applicable. For the purposes of additional comparison, a center‐of‐mass (COM) algorithm was implemented both with and without the use of TOF information. Using the motion estimate from each method, amplitude‐based gating was applied, and gated images were reconstructed.

Results

The TOF‐PEPT algorithm is shown to successfully determine the respiratory motion for both phantom and clinical studies. The derived motion signals correlated well with the Anzai band; correlation coefficients of 0.99 and 0.94‐0.97 were obtained for the phantom study and the clinical studies, respectively. TOF‐PEPT was found to be 13–38% better correlated with the Anzai results than the COM methods. Maximum Standardized Uptake Values (SUVs) were used to quantitatively compare the reconstructed‐gated images. In comparison with the ungated image, a 14–39% increase in the max SUV across several lesion areas and an 8.7% increase in the max SUV on the tracked lesion area were observed in the gated images based on TOF‐PEPT. The distinct presence of lesions with reduced blurring effect and generally sharper images were readily apparent in all clinical studies. In addition, max SUVs were found to be 4–10% higher in the TOF‐PEPT‐based gated images than in those based on Anzai and COM methods.

Conclusion

A PEPT‐ based algorithm has been presented for determining movement due to respiratory motion during PET/CT imaging. Gating based on the motion estimate is shown to quantifiably improve the image quality in both a controlled point source phantom study and in clinical data patient studies. The algorithm has the potential to facilitate true motion correction where the reconstruction algorithm can use all data available.