1
|
Schneider M, Schilz JD, Schürer M, Gantz S, Dreyer A, Rothe G, Tillner F, Bodenstein E, Horst F, Beyreuther E. SAPPHIRE -establishment of small animal proton and photon image-guided radiation experiments. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:095020. [PMID: 38537301 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad3887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Thein vivoevolution of radiotherapy necessitates innovative platforms for preclinical investigation, bridging the gap between bench research and clinical applications. Understanding the nuances of radiation response, specifically tailored to proton and photon therapies, is critical for optimizing treatment outcomes. Within this context, preclinicalin vivoexperimental setups incorporating image guidance for both photon and proton therapies are pivotal, enabling the translation of findings from small animal models to clinical settings. TheSAPPHIREproject represents a milestone in this pursuit, presenting the installation of the small animal radiation therapy integrated beamline (SmART+ IB, Precision X-Ray Inc., Madison, Connecticut, USA) designed for preclinical image-guided proton and photon therapy experiments at University Proton Therapy Dresden. Through Monte Carlo simulations, low-dose on-site cone beam computed tomography imaging and quality assurance alignment protocols, the project ensures the safe and precise application of radiation, crucial for replicating clinical scenarios in small animal models. The creation of Hounsfield lookup tables and comprehensive proton and photon beam characterizations within this system enable accurate dose calculations, allowing for targeted and controlled comparison experiments. By integrating these capabilities,SAPPHIREbridges preclinical investigations and potential clinical applications, offering a platform for translational radiobiology research and cancer therapy advancements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Schneider
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiation Physics, Dresden, Germany
| | - Joshua D Schilz
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiation Physics, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Schürer
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Medizinische Fakultät and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Sebastian Gantz
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Anne Dreyer
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gert Rothe
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Falk Tillner
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Bodenstein
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Felix Horst
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elke Beyreuther
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiation Physics, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Volz L, Graeff C, Durante M, Collins-Fekete CA. Focus stacking single-event particle radiography for high spatial resolution images and 3D feature localization. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:024001. [PMID: 38056016 PMCID: PMC10777170 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad131a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Objective.We demonstrate a novel focus stacking technique to improve spatial resolution of single-event particle radiography (pRad), and exploit its potential for 3D feature detection.Approach.Focus stacking, used typically in optical photography and microscopy, is a technique to combine multiple images with different focal depths into a single super-resolution image. Each pixel in the final image is chosen from the image with the largest gradient at that pixel's position. pRad data can be reconstructed at different depths in the patient based on an estimate of each particle's trajectory (called distance-driven binning; DDB). For a given feature, there is a depth of reconstruction for which the spatial resolution of DDB is maximal. Focus stacking can hence be applied to a series of DDB images reconstructed from a single pRad acquisition for different depths, yielding both a high-resolution projection and information on the features' radiological depth at the same time. We demonstrate this technique with Geant4 simulated pRads of a water phantom (20 cm thick) with five bone cube inserts at different depths (1 × 1 × 1 cm3) and a lung cancer patient.Main results.For proton radiography of the cube phantom, focus stacking achieved a median resolution improvement of 136% compared to a state-of-the-art maximum likelihood pRad reconstruction algorithm and a median of 28% compared to DDB where the reconstruction depth was the center of each cube. For the lung patient, resolution was visually improved, without loss in accuracy. The focus stacking method also enabled to estimate the depth of the cubes within few millimeters accuracy, except for one shallow cube, where the depth was underestimated by 2.5 cm.Significance.Focus stacking utilizes the inherent 3D information encoded in pRad by the particle's scattering, overcoming current spatial resolution limits. It further opens possibilities for 3D feature localization. Therefore, focus stacking holds great potential for future pRad applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lennart Volz
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Christian Graeff
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Marco Durante
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
- Department of Condensed Matter Physics, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aehle M, Alme J, Gábor Barnaföldi G, Blühdorn J, Bodova T, Borshchov V, van den Brink A, Eikeland V, Feofilov G, Garth C, Gauger NR, Grøttvik O, Helstrup H, Igolkin S, Keidel R, Kobdaj C, Kortus T, Kusch L, Leonhardt V, Mehendale S, Ningappa Mulawade R, Harald Odland O, O'Neill G, Papp G, Peitzmann T, Pettersen HES, Piersimoni P, Pochampalli R, Protsenko M, Rauch M, Ur Rehman A, Richter M, Röhrich D, Sagebaum M, Santana J, Schilling A, Seco J, Songmoolnak A, Sudár Á, Tambave G, Tymchuk I, Ullaland K, Varga-Kofarago M, Volz L, Wagner B, Wendzel S, Wiebel A, Xiao R, Yang S, Zillien S. Exploration of differentiability in a proton computed tomography simulation framework. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:244002. [PMID: 37949060 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0bdd] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Gradient-based optimization using algorithmic derivatives can be a useful technique to improve engineering designs with respect to a computer-implemented objective function. Likewise, uncertainty quantification through computer simulations can be carried out by means of derivatives of the computer simulation. However, the effectiveness of these techniques depends on how 'well-linearizable' the software is. In this study, we assess how promising derivative information of a typical proton computed tomography (pCT) scan computer simulation is for the aforementioned applications.Approach.This study is mainly based on numerical experiments, in which we repeatedly evaluate three representative computational steps with perturbed input values. We support our observations with a review of the algorithmic steps and arithmetic operations performed by the software, using debugging techniques.Main results.The model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) subprocedure (at the end of the software pipeline) and the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation (at the beginning) were piecewise differentiable. However, the observed high density and magnitude of jumps was likely to preclude most meaningful uses of the derivatives. Jumps in the MBIR function arose from the discrete computation of the set of voxels intersected by a proton path, and could be reduced in magnitude by a 'fuzzy voxels' approach. The investigated jumps in the MC function arose from local changes in the control flow that affected the amount of consumed random numbers. The tracking algorithm solves an inherently non-differentiable problem.Significance.Besides the technical challenges of merely applying AD to existing software projects, the MC and MBIR codes must be adapted to compute smoother functions. For the MBIR code, we presented one possible approach for this while for the MC code, this will be subject to further research. For the tracking subprocedure, further research on surrogate models is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Aehle
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Johan Alme
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Johannes Blühdorn
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Tea Bodova
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | | | | | - Viljar Eikeland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Christoph Garth
- Scientific Visualization Lab, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Nicolas R Gauger
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Ola Grøttvik
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Håvard Helstrup
- Department of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Ralf Keidel
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Chinorat Kobdaj
- Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
| | - Tobias Kortus
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Lisa Kusch
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Viktor Leonhardt
- Scientific Visualization Lab, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Shruti Mehendale
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Raju Ningappa Mulawade
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Odd Harald Odland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, NO-5021 Bergen, Norway
| | - George O'Neill
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Gábor Papp
- Institute for Physics, Eötvös Loránd University, 1/A Pázmány P. Sétány, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Thomas Peitzmann
- Institute for Subatomic Physics, Utrecht University/Nikhef, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Pierluigi Piersimoni
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
- FSN Department, ENEA, Frascati Research Center, I-00044, Frascati, Italy
| | - Rohit Pochampalli
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Maksym Protsenko
- Research and Production Enterprise 'LTU' (RPE LTU), Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - Max Rauch
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Attiq Ur Rehman
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Dieter Röhrich
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Max Sagebaum
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Joshua Santana
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Alexander Schilling
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- Department of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, DKFZGerman Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arnon Songmoolnak
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
- Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
| | - Ákos Sudár
- Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ganesh Tambave
- Center for Medical and Radiation Physics (CMRP), National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER), Bhubaneswar, India
| | - Ihor Tymchuk
- Research and Production Enterprise 'LTU' (RPE LTU), Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - Kjetil Ullaland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Lennart Volz
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Boris Wagner
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Steffen Wendzel
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Alexander Wiebel
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - RenZheng Xiao
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
- College of Mechanical & Power Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, People's Republic of China
| | - Shiming Yang
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Sebastian Zillien
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lovatti G, Nitta M, Javad Safari M, Gianoli C, Pinto M, Dedes G, Zoglauer A, Thirolf PG, Parodi K. Design study of a novel geometrical arrangement for an in-beam small animal positron emission tomography scanner. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:235005. [PMID: 37906973 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
Objective.We designed a geometrical solution for a small animal in-beam positron emission tomography (PET) scanner to be used in the project SIRMIO (Small animal proton irradiator for research in molecular image-guided radiation-oncology). The system is based on 56 scintillator blocks of pixelated LYSO crystals. The crystals are arranged providing a pyramidal-step shape to optimize the geometrical coverage in a spherical configuration.Approach.Different arrangements have been simulated and compared in terms of spatial resolution and sensitivity. The chosen setup enables us to reach a good trade-off between a solid angle coverage and sufficient available space for the integration of additional components of the first design prototype of the SIRMIO platform. The possibility of moving the mouse holder inside the PET scanner furthermore allows for achieving the optimum placement of the irradiation area for all the possible tumor positions in the body of the mouse. The work also includes a study of the scintillator material where LYSO and GAGG are compared with a focus on the random coincidence noise due to the natural radioactivity of Lutetium in LYSO, justifying the choice of LYSO for the development of the final system.Main results.The best imaging performance can be achieved with a sub-millimeter spatial resolution and sensitivity of 10% in the center of the scanner, as verified in thorough simulations of point sources. The simulation of realistic irradiation scenarios of proton beams in PMMA targets with/without air gaps indicates the ability of the proposed PET system to detect range shifts down to 0.2 mm.Significance.The presented results support the choice of the identified optimal design for a novel spherical in-beam PET scanner which is currently under commissioning for application to small animal proton and light ion irradiation, and which might find also application, e.g. for biological image-guidance in x-ray irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Lovatti
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Munetaka Nitta
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Mohammad Javad Safari
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Chiara Gianoli
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Marco Pinto
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Georgios Dedes
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Zoglauer
- Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, United States of America
| | - Peter G Thirolf
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Palaniappan P, Knudsen Y, Meyer S, Gianoli C, Schnürle K, Würl M, Bortfeldt J, Parodi K, Riboldi M. Multi-stage image registration based on list-mode proton radiographies for small animal proton irradiation: A simulation study. Z Med Phys 2023:S0939-3889(23)00045-4. [PMID: 37353464 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Abstract
We present a multi-stage and multi-resolution deformable image registration framework for image-guidance at a small animal proton irradiation platform. The framework is based on list-mode proton radiographies acquired at different angles, which are used to deform a 3D treatment planning CT relying on normalized mutual information (NMI) or root mean square error (RMSE) in the projection domain. We utilized a mouse X-ray micro-CT expressed in relative stopping power (RSP), and obtained Monte Carlo simulations of proton images in list-mode for three different treatment sites (brain, head and neck, lung). Rigid transformations and controlled artificial deformation were applied to mimic position misalignments, weight loss and breathing changes. Results were evaluated based on the residual RMSE of RSP in the image domain including the comparison of extracted local features, i.e. between the reference micro-CT and the one transformed taking into account the calculated deformation. The residual RMSE of the RSP showed that the accuracy of the registration framework is promising for compensating rigid (>97% accuracy) and non-rigid (∼95% accuracy) transformations with respect to a conventional 3D-3D registration. Results showed that the registration accuracy is degraded when considering the realistic detector performance and NMI as a metric, whereas the RMSE in projection domain is rather insensitive. This work demonstrates the pre-clinical feasibility of the registration framework on different treatment sites and its use for small animal imaging with a realistic detector. Further computational optimization of the framework is required to enable the use of this tool for online estimation of the deformation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prasannakumar Palaniappan
- Department of Medical Physics - Experimental Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
| | - Yana Knudsen
- Department of Medical Physics - Experimental Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Meyer
- Department of Medical Physics - Experimental Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Chiara Gianoli
- Department of Medical Physics - Experimental Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Katrin Schnürle
- Department of Medical Physics - Experimental Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Würl
- Department of Medical Physics - Experimental Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Jonathan Bortfeldt
- Department of Medical Physics - Experimental Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics - Experimental Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Marco Riboldi
- Department of Medical Physics - Experimental Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Verhaegen F, Butterworth KT, Chalmers AJ, Coppes RP, de Ruysscher D, Dobiasch S, Fenwick JD, Granton PV, Heijmans SHJ, Hill MA, Koumenis C, Lauber K, Marples B, Parodi K, Persoon LCGG, Staut N, Subiel A, Vaes RDW, van Hoof S, Verginadis IL, Wilkens JJ, Williams KJ, Wilson GD, Dubois LJ. Roadmap for precision preclinical x-ray radiation studies. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:06RM01. [PMID: 36584393 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acaf45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This Roadmap paper covers the field of precision preclinical x-ray radiation studies in animal models. It is mostly focused on models for cancer and normal tissue response to radiation, but also discusses other disease models. The recent technological evolution in imaging, irradiation, dosimetry and monitoring that have empowered these kinds of studies is discussed, and many developments in the near future are outlined. Finally, clinical translation and reverse translation are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Verhaegen
- MAASTRO Clinic, Radiotherapy Division, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- SmART Scientific Solutions BV, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Karl T Butterworth
- Patrick G. Johnston, Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony J Chalmers
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1QH, United Kingdom
| | - Rob P Coppes
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences of Cells & Systems, Section Molecular Cell Biology and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 AD Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk de Ruysscher
- MAASTRO Clinic, Radiotherapy Division, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Germany
| | - John D Fenwick
- Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering University College LondonMalet Place Engineering Building, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Mark A Hill
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, ORCRB Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom
| | - Constantinos Koumenis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Kirsten Lauber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU München, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Munich, Germany
| | - Brian Marples
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, NY, United States of America
| | - Katia Parodi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Munich, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Garching b. Munich, Germany
| | | | - Nick Staut
- SmART Scientific Solutions BV, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Subiel
- National Physical Laboratory, Medical Radiation Science Hampton Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LW, United Kingdom
| | - Rianne D W Vaes
- MAASTRO Clinic, Radiotherapy Division, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ioannis L Verginadis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Jan J Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Germany
- Physics Department, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | - Kaye J Williams
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - George D Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, MI, United States of America
- Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| | - Ludwig J Dubois
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meyer S, Pinto M, Parodi K, Gianoli C. The impact of path estimates in iterative ion CT reconstructions for clinical-like cases. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 33765672 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abf1ff] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Ion computed tomography (CT) promises to mitigate range uncertainties inherent in the conversion of x-ray Hounsfield units into ion relative stopping power (RSP) for ion beam therapy treatment planning. To improve accuracy and spatial resolution of ion CT by accounting for statistical multiple Coulomb scattering deflection of the ion trajectories from a straight line path (SLP), the most likely path (MLP) and the cubic spline path (CSP) have been proposed. In this work, we use FLUKA Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the impact of these path estimates in iterative tomographic reconstruction algorithms for proton, helium and carbon ions. To this end the ordered subset simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique was used and coupled with a total variation superiorization (TVS). We evaluate the image quality and dose calculation accuracy in proton therapy treatment planning of cranial patient anatomies. CSP and MLP generally yielded nearly equal image quality with an average RSP relative error improvement over the SLP of 0.6%, 0.3% and 0.3% for proton, helium and carbon ion CT, respectively. Bone and low density materials have been identified as regions of largest enhancement in RSP accuracy. Nevertheless, only minor differences in dose calculation results were observed between the different models and relative range errors of better than 0.5% were obtained in all cases. Largest improvements were found for proton CT in complex scenarios with strong heterogeneities along the beam path. The additional TVS provided substantially reduced image noise, resulting in improved image quality in particular for soft tissue regions. Employing the CSP and MLP for iterative ion CT reconstructions enabled improved image quality over the SLP even in realistic and heterogeneous patient anatomy. However, only limited benefit in dose calculation accuracy was obtained even though an ideal detector system was simulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Meyer
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States of America.,Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Garching b. München, Germany
| | - Marco Pinto
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Garching b. München, Germany
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Garching b. München, Germany.,Shared senior authorship
| | - Chiara Gianoli
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Garching b. München, Germany.,Shared senior authorship
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Parodi K, Assmann W, Belka C, Bortfeldt J, Clevert DA, Dedes G, Kalunga R, Kundel S, Kurichiyanil N, Lämmer P, Lascaud J, Lauber K, Lovatti G, Meyer S, Nitta M, Pinto M, Safari MJ, Schnürle K, Schreiber J, Thirolf PG, Wieser HP, Würl M. Towards a novel small animal proton irradiation platform: the SIRMIO project. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:1470-1475. [PMID: 31271091 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1630752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Background: Precision small animal radiotherapy research is a young emerging field aiming to provide new experimental insights into tumor and normal tissue models in different microenvironments, to unravel complex mechanisms of radiation damage in target and non-target tissues and assess efficacy of novel therapeutic strategies. For photon therapy, modern small animal radiotherapy research platforms have been developed over the last years and are meanwhile commercially available. Conversely, for proton therapy, which holds potential for an even superior outcome than photon therapy, no commercial system exists yet. Material and methods: The project SIRMIO (Small Animal Proton Irradiator for Research in Molecular Image-guided Radiation-Oncology) aims at realizing and demonstrating an innovative portable prototype system for precision image-guided small animal proton irradiation, suitable for installation at existing clinical treatment facilities. The proposed design combines precise dose application with in situ multi-modal anatomical image guidance and in vivo verification of the actual treatment delivery. Results and conclusions: This manuscript describes the status of the different components under development, featuring a dedicated beamline for degradation and focusing of clinical proton beams, along with novel detector systems for in situimaging and range verification. The foreseen workflow includes pre-treatment proton transmission imaging, complemented by ultrasonic tumor localization, for treatment planning and position verification, followed by image-guided delivery with on site range verification by means of ionoacoustics (for pulsed beams) and positron-emission-tomography (PET, for continuous beams). The proposed compact and cost-effective system promises to open a new era in small animal proton therapy research, contributing to the basic understanding of in vivo radiation action to identify areas of potential breakthroughs for future translation into innovative clinical strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Walter Assmann
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jonathan Bortfeldt
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Dirk-André Clevert
- Department of Radiology, Interdisziplinäres Ultraschall-Zentrum, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - George Dedes
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Ronaldo Kalunga
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Sonja Kundel
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Neeraj Kurichiyanil
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Paulina Lämmer
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Julie Lascaud
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Kirsten Lauber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Giulio Lovatti
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Meyer
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Munetaka Nitta
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Marco Pinto
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Mohammad J. Safari
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Katrin Schnürle
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Jörg Schreiber
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Peter G. Thirolf
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Wieser
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Würl
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|