1
|
Waltenberger M, Vogel MME, Bernhardt D, Münch S, Dobiasch S, Redmond KJ, Lo SS, Acker G, Fehlings MG, Ringel F, Vajkoczy P, Meyer B, Combs SE. Radiotherapy concepts for spinal metastases-results from an online survey among radiation oncologists of the German Society for Radiation Oncology. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:159-174. [PMID: 37272996 PMCID: PMC10805849 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02082-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Spinal metastases (SM) are a common radiotherapy (RT) indication. There is limited level I data to drive decision making regarding dose regimen (DR) and target volume definition (TVD). We aim to depict the patterns of care for RT of SM among German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) members. METHODS An online survey on conventional RT and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for SM, distributed via e‑mail to all DEGRO members, was completed by 80 radiation oncologists between February 24 and April 29, 2022. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. RESULTS A variety of DR was frequently used for conventional RT (primary: n = 15, adjuvant: n = 14). 30 Gy/10 fractions was reported most frequently. TVD in adjuvant RT was heterogenous, with a trend towards larger volumes. SBRT was offered in 65% (primary) and 21% (adjuvant) of participants' institutions. A variety of DR was reported (primary: n = 40, adjuvant: n = 27), most commonly 27 Gy/3 fractions and 30 Gy/5 fractions. 59% followed International Consensus Guidelines (ICG) for TVD. CONCLUSION We provide a representative depiction of RT practice for SM among DEGRO members. DR and TVD are heterogeneous. SBRT is not comprehensively practiced, especially in the adjuvant setting. Further research is needed to provide a solid data basis for detailed recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Waltenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany.
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Münch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, Munich, Germany
| | - Kristin J Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA
| | - Güliz Acker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Florian Ringel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kern J, Schilling D, Schneeweis C, Schmid RM, Schneider G, Combs SE, Dobiasch S. Identification of the unfolded protein response pathway as target for radiosensitization in pancreatic cancer. Radiother Oncol 2024; 191:110059. [PMID: 38135186 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Due to the high intrinsic radioresistance of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), radiotherapy (RT) is only beneficial in 30% of patients. Therefore, this study aimed to identify targets to improve the efficacy of RT in PDAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Alamar Blue proliferation and colony formation assay (CFA) were used to determine the radioresponse of a cohort of 38 murine PDAC cell lines. A gene set enrichment analysis was performed to reveal differentially expressed pathways. CFA, cell cycle distribution, γH2AX FACS analysis, and Caspase 3/7 SYTOX assay were used to examine the effect of a combination treatment using KIRA8 as an IRE1α-inhibitor and Ceapin-A7 as an inhibitor against ATF6. RESULTS The unfolded protein response (UPR) was identified as a pathway highly expressed in radioresistant cell lines. Using the IRE1α-inhibitor KIRA8 or the ATF6-inhibitor Ceapin-A7 in combination with radiation, a radiosensitizing effect was observed in radioresistant cell lines, but no substantial alteration of the radioresponse in radiosensitive cell lines. Mechanistically, increased apoptosis by KIRA8 in combination with radiation and a cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase after ATF6 inhibition and radiation have been observed in radioresistant cell lines. CONCLUSION So, our data show evidence that the UPR is involved in radioresistance of PDAC. Increased apoptosis and a G1 cell cycle arrest seem to be responsible for the radiosensitizing effect of UPR inhibition. These findings are supportive for developing novel combination treatment concepts in PDAC to overcome radioresistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Kern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Daniela Schilling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Christian Schneeweis
- Department of Medicine II, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Roland M Schmid
- Department of Medicine II, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Günter Schneider
- Department of Medicine II, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany; Department of General Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Neuherberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Neuherberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gkika E, Kostyszyn D, Fechter T, Moustakis C, Ernst F, Boda-Heggemann J, Sarria G, Dieckmann K, Dobiasch S, Duma MN, Eberle F, Kroeger K, Häussler B, Izaguirre V, Jazmati D, Lautenschläger S, Lohaus F, Mantel F, Menzel J, Pachmann S, Pavic M, Radlanski K, Riesterer O, Gerum S, Röder F, Willner J, Barczyk S, Imhoff D, Blanck O, Wittig A, Guckenberger M, Grosu AL, Brunner TB. Interobserver agreement on definition of the target volume in stereotactic radiotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma using different imaging modalities. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:973-981. [PMID: 37268767 PMCID: PMC10598103 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02085-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate interobserver agreement (IOA) on target volume definition for pancreatic cancer (PACA) within the Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Radiotherapy Working Group of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) and to identify the influence of imaging modalities on the definition of the target volumes. METHODS Two cases of locally advanced PACA and one local recurrence were selected from a large SBRT database. Delineation was based on either a planning 4D CT with or without (w/wo) IV contrast, w/wo PET/CT, and w/wo diagnostic MRI. Novel compared to other studies, a combination of four metrics was used to integrate several aspects of target volume segmentation: the Dice coefficient (DSC), the Hausdorff distance (HD), the probabilistic distance (PBD), and the volumetric similarity (VS). RESULTS For all three GTVs, the median DSC was 0.75 (range 0.17-0.95), the median HD 15 (range 3.22-67.11) mm, the median PBD 0.33 (range 0.06-4.86), and the median VS was 0.88 (range 0.31-1). For ITVs and PTVs the results were similar. When comparing the imaging modalities for delineation, the best agreement for the GTV was achieved using PET/CT, and for the ITV and PTV using 4D PET/CT, in treatment position with abdominal compression. CONCLUSION Overall, there was good GTV agreement (DSC). Combined metrics appeared to allow a more valid detection of interobserver variation. For SBRT, either 4D PET/CT or 3D PET/CT in treatment position with abdominal compression leads to better agreement and should be considered as a very useful imaging modality for the definition of treatment volumes in pancreatic SBRT. Contouring does not appear to be the weakest link in the treatment planning chain of SBRT for PACA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Robert Koch Str 3, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - D Kostyszyn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Robert Koch Str 3, Freiburg, Germany
| | - T Fechter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Robert Koch Str 3, Freiburg, Germany
| | - C Moustakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - F Ernst
- Institute for Robotics and Cognitive Systems, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
| | - J Boda-Heggemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - G Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - K Dieckmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Departments of the MedUni Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, TU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M N Duma
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - F Eberle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - K Kroeger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - B Häussler
- Radiation Oncology Dr. Häussler/Dr. Schorer, Munich, Germany
| | - V Izaguirre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - D Jazmati
- Proton Therapy Centre, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - S Lautenschläger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Marburg, Germany
| | - F Lohaus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - F Mantel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - J Menzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - S Pachmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weilheim Clinic, Weilheim, Germany
| | - M Pavic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - K Radlanski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charite, University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - O Riesterer
- Centre for Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - S Gerum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Clinic, Paracelsus Medical University (PMU), Salzburg, Austria
| | - F Röder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Clinic, Paracelsus Medical University (PMU), Salzburg, Austria
| | - J Willner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - S Barczyk
- Center for Radiation Oncology, Belegklinik am St. Agnes-Hospital, Bocholt, Germany
| | - D Imhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saphir Radiosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - O Blanck
- Saphir Radiosurgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - A Wittig
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Robert Koch Str 3, Freiburg, Germany
| | - T B Brunner
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rotgerink LL, Burkhardt R, Groll T, Felchle H, Nefzger SM, Walther CN, Gissibl J, Timnik VR, Dobiasch S, Steiger K, Combs SE, Wilkens J, Fischer J. Experimental Investigation of Lung Toxicity after Radiation Therapy Combined with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e243-e244. [PMID: 37784956 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) The combination of radiation therapy (RT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has resulted in prolonged survival in patients with locally advanced lung cancer (NSCLC). However, RT and ICIs carry the risk of inflammatory and irreversible lung damage and might have synergistic effects on these adverse events. Importantly, only little is known about the risk of enhanced side effects of the lung and which factors modulate such toxicity. In addition, there is a need for sensitive diagnostics for the early detection of lung injury after combined radioimmunotherapy. Recently, experimental x-ray dark-field radiography was able to detect radiation-induced lung injury earlier than conventional radiography in mice. MATERIALS/METHODS The right thorax of mice was irradiated with unfractionated RT (1x15 Gy or 1x30 Gy) or fractionated RT (5x9 Gy). In addition, indicated experimental groups received ICIs (a-PD1, a-CTLA4 or combination) for one month. After four months, the mice were analyzed using different methods to quantify lung damage: lung coefficient as surrogate marker for lung fibrosis, histopathological staining of fibrosis, conventional x-ray, and dark-field radiography. RESULTS We found enhanced signs of lung fibrosis (lung coefficient and histopathological score) after unfractionated RT in combination with ICIs. Surprisingly, combination of ICIs with RT resulted in opposite effects. Specifically, concomitant combination of ICIs with fractionated RT resulted in reduced lung coefficients and lower histopathological signs of lung fibrosis in mice treated in this way. Importantly, in vivo x-ray dark-field radiographs showed the same trend as the ex vivo assessment of the lungs. CONCLUSION To the best of our knowledge, this is the first experimental study to find that the combination of RT with ICIs has an impact on the risk of pulmonary fibrosis. Strikingly, ICIs (a-PD1 + a-CTLA4) combined with unfractionated RT resulted in increased lung damage, while concomitant use of ICIs (a-PD1 + a-CTLA4) with fractionated RT resulted in reduced lung toxicity. In the field of radioimmunotherapy, such studies are of great value for the interpretation of clinical studies and of importance for the design of further clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Lansink Rotgerink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - R Burkhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany; Physics Department, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - T Groll
- Comparative Experimental Pathology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - H Felchle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - S M Nefzger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - C N Walther
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - J Gissibl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - V R Timnik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - S Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - K Steiger
- Comparative Experimental Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - J Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany; Physics Department, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Fischer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dobiasch S, Kessler C, Cadacio F, Maurer C, Schilling D, Steiger K, Schmid RM, Reichert M, Combs SE. Radiobiological Characterization of Pancreatic Cancer Patient-Derived Organoids. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e226-e227. [PMID: 37784915 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most aggressive and lethal tumors with a 5-year survival rate of less than 10%. Neoadjuvant radio(chemo)therapy aiming tumor downsizing fails in about 70% due to high heterogeneity, strong desmoplastic stroma and intrinsic radioresistance. In this project, pancreatic cancer patient-derived organoids (PDOs) are characterized regarding radioresponse, DNA-damage, proliferation and hypoxia, and clinical patients' outcome is correlated with the preclinical radiobiological data. In contrast to 2D monolayer cultures, PDOs maintain similar appearance, organization and functionality as the original tissue and therefore might have the potential as advanced preclinical model in radiation oncology. MATERIALS/METHODS The radiation response of nine different pancreatic cancer PDO lines was determined by 3D cell viability assay. PDOs were irradiated with 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 Gy (CellRad, Precision, USA) 24h after seeding and the ATP-dependent viability assay was performed 72h and 7d after irradiation (RT). Changes in morphology, number, and size were investigated by microscopy at different time points after RT. PDOs were characterized immunohistochemically by y-H2AX (DNA damage), and Ki-67 (proliferation) staining. RNA sequencing data of treatment-naive PDOs were analyzed by gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) regarding radioresistance. Preclinical results were correlated with corresponding clinical data of PDAC patients. RESULTS After optimization of the experimental set-up, PDOs showed a dose-dependent decrease in viability 7d after RT and heterogeneity in radioresponse. PDO lines were classified into radiosensitive, -intermediate, and -resistant subclasses. Immunohisto-chemical staining showed a significant increase in DNA double-strand breaks after RT. A correlation between radiosensitivity and enhanced proliferation index Ki67 was observed. Based on RNA sequencing data, OXPHOS- and hypoxia-dependent genes, amongst others, were identified as pathways significantly differentially regulated between the subclasses by GSEA. Preclinical radioresistance was associated with worse survival and poor clinical outcome. CONCLUSION The results of the preclinical experiments demonstrate the heterogeneity among PDOs in response to RT reflecting the clinical situation of patients with PDAC. The findings from the GSEA show promising aspects for further experiments to understand the role of hypoxia in PDAC and its effect on radioresistance. PDOs have the potential as a novel translational research platform in radiation oncology. Prospectively, we aim to implement the screening of the radiosensitivity of PDOs in clinical practice for the realization of truly personalized radiotherapy in PDAC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - C Kessler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - F Cadacio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - C Maurer
- Medical Clinic and Polyclinic II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - D Schilling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - K Steiger
- Comparative Experimental Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - R M Schmid
- Medical Clinic and Polyclinic II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - M Reichert
- Medical Clinic and Polyclinic II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany; Center for Organoid Systems (COS), Technical University of Munich (TUM), Garching, Germany
| | - S E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ruhle A, Roesch J, Oertel M, Fabian A, Wegen S, Trommer M, Hering D, Maeurer M, Dobiasch S, von der Grün J, Medenwald D, Süß C, Hoeck M, Fleischmann DF, Löser A, Heß S, Tamaskovic B, Vinsensia M, Hecht M, Nicolay NH. MRI, FDG-PET/CT and Image-Guidance for Re-Irradiation of Locoregionally Recurrent or Second Primary Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients - Results of a Multicenter Cohort Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e619-e620. [PMID: 37785856 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.2002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) To investigate patterns of care and prognostic benefits of MRI, FDG-PET/CT and image-guidance in re-irradiation of locoregionally recurrent or second primary head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas (r/s HNSCCs) within a multicenter cohort study. MATERIALS/METHODS Patients receiving re-irradiation for r/s HNSCC between 2009 and 2020 at 16 tertiary cancer centers in Germany were retrospectively analyzed in terms of MRI and FDG-PET/CT usage for treatment planning and regarding image-guidance frequency during re-irradiation. Patterns of use of these modalities over time were analyzed by binary logistic regression analysis, and the association between the usage of these modalities and best locoregional treatment response was analyzed with chi-square tests. Cumulative incidence analyses of locoregional failures with death as competing event were performed. RESULTS In the total cohort of 297 patients, 226 (76%) were male, median age was 62 years (IQR, 56-70), and median ECOG was 1 (IQR, 1-2). There were 260 locoregionally recurrent HNSCCs, and 37 second primary HNSCCs; 44 patients (15%) had distant metastases at the time of re-irradiation. MRI and FDG-PET/CT was used for re-irradiation planning in 117 (39%) and 71 patients (24%), respectively. In median, image guidance (IGRT) was performed twice weekly (IQR, 1-5), usually with cone beam CTs or megavolt-CTs, and 85 patients (29%) received daily IGRT during re-irradiation. Usage of MRI (OR = 0.967; 95% CI, 0.892-1.048; p = .416), FDG-PET/CT (OR = 1.053; 95% CI, 0.960-1.156; p = .274), or daily IGRT (OR = 1.057; 95% CI, 0.968-1.115; p = .218) did not increase in frequency over time within the analyzed time span but was significantly dependent on the treatment center (χ2(15), P<.001 for all modalities). Daily IGRT was associated with a higher rate of at least stable disease after re-irradiation as assessed by RECIST criteria (χ2(1) = 4.011, p<.05). There was a trend towards better RECIST-assessed treatment response for MRI (χ2(1) = 3.223, p = .073) and FDG-PET/CT (χ2(1) = 2.792, p = .095) as part of the re-irradiation planning process. Incidence of locoregional failures was not dependent on MRI (SHR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.67-1.33; p = 0.741, Fine-Gray), FDG-PET/CT (SHR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.59-1.33; p = 0.552) or daily IGRT (SHR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.51-1.14, p = 0.182), There was a trend towards lower acute grade 3/4-toxicities in patients receiving daily IGRT (χ2(1) = 3.354, p = 0.067). CONCLUSION Our data suggest that daily IGRT may increase disease control and should be regularly applied for re-irradiation of r/s HNSCCs. MRI and FDG-PET/CT usage were not associated with the incidence of locoregional failures after re-irradiation. However, prospective trials with multiparametric MRI and/or FDG-PET/CT for optimal re-irradiation planning are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ruhle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - J Roesch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - M Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - A Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - S Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - M Trommer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - D Hering
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - M Maeurer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - S Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - J von der Grün
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - D Medenwald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - C Süß
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - M Hoeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - D F Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - A Löser
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Outpatient Center of the UKE GmbH, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - S Heß
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Julius-Maximilians-University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - B Tamaskovic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - M Vinsensia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - M Hecht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany
| | - N H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Strand Z, Schrickel F, Dobiasch S, Thomsen AR, Steiger K, Gempt J, Meyer B, Combs SE, Schilling D. Establishment of a 3D Model to Characterize the Radioresponse of Patient-Derived Glioblastoma Cells. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4051. [PMID: 37627079 PMCID: PMC10452456 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Despite modern, multimodal therapeutic options of surgery, chemotherapy, tumor-treating fields (TTF), and radiotherapy, the 5-year survival is below 10%. In order to develop new therapies, better preclinical models are needed that mimic the complexity of a tumor. In this work, we established a novel three-dimensional (3D) model for patient-derived GBM cell lines. To analyze the volume and growth pattern of primary GBM cells in 3D culture, a CoSeedisTM culture system was used, and radiation sensitivity in comparison to conventional 2D colony formation assay (CFA) was analyzed. Both culture systems revealed a dose-dependent reduction in survival, but the high variance in colony size and shape prevented reliable evaluation of the 2D cultures. In contrast, the size of 3D spheroids could be measured accurately. Immunostaining of spheroids grown in the 3D culture system showed an increase in the DNA double-strand-break marker γH2AX one hour after irradiation. After 24 h, a decrease in DNA damage was observed, indicating active repair mechanisms. In summary, this new translational 3D model may better reflect the tumor complexity and be useful for analyzing the growth, radiosensitivity, and DNA repair of patient-derived GBM cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe Strand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Finn Schrickel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas R. Thomsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Katja Steiger
- Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- Comparative Experimental Pathology (CEP), Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Daniela Schilling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kampfer S, Dobiasch S, Combs SE, Wilkens JJ. Development of a PTV margin for preclinical irradiation of orthotopic pancreatic tumors derived from a well-known recipe for humans. Z Med Phys 2023:S0939-3889(23)00042-9. [PMID: 37225604 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
In human radiotherapy a safety margin (PTV margin) is essential for successful irradiation and is usually part of clinical treatment planning. In preclinical radiotherapy research with small animals, most uncertainties and inaccuracies are present as well, but according to the literature a margin is used only scarcely. In addition, there is only little experience about the appropriate size of the margin, which should carefully be investigated and considered, since sparing of organs at risk or normal tissue is affected. Here we estimate the needed margin for preclinical irradiation by adapting a well-known human margin recipe from van Herck et al. to the dimensions and requirements of the specimen on a small animal radiation research platform (SARRP). We adjusted the factors of the described formula to the specific challenges in an orthotopic pancreatic tumor mouse model to establish an appropriate margin concept. The SARRP was used with its image-guidance irradiation possibility for arc irradiation with a field size of 10 × 10 mm2 for 5 fractions. Our goal was to irradiate the clinical target volume (CTV) of at least 90% of our mice with at least 95% of the prescribed dose. By carefully analyzing all relevant factors we gain a CTV to planning target volume (PTV) margin of 1.5 mm for our preclinical setup. The stated safety margin is strongly dependent on the exact setting of the experiment and has to be adjusted for other experimental settings. The few stated values in literature correspond well to our result. Even if using margins in the preclinical setting might be an additional challenge, we think it is crucial to use them to produce reliable results and improve the efficacy of radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Severin Kampfer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany; Physics Department, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Garching, Germany.
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany.
| | - Jan J Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany; Physics Department, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Garching, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Roesch J, Oertel M, Wegen S, Trommer M, Schleifenbaum J, Hering D, Mäurer M, Knippen S, Dobiasch S, Waltenberger M, von der Grün J, Medenwald D, Süß C, Hoeck M, Käsmann L, Fleischmann DF, Rühle A, Nicolay NH, Fabian A, Löser A, Heß S, Tamaskovics B, Vinsensia M, Hecht M. Dose-escalated re-irradiation improves outcome in locally recurrent head and neck cancer - Results of a large multicenter analysis. Radiother Oncol 2023; 181:109380. [PMID: 36273736 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
To determine efficacy and prognostic parameters of definitive re-irradiation of locoregionally recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with locoregionally recurrent or second primary HNSCC undergoing re-irradiation with modern radiotherapy technique were eligible for this multicentric retrospective analysis. Main endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and locoregional control (LC). Univariate analyses were performed using the Kaplan Meier Method (log-rank). For multivariable analysis, Cox regression was used. RESULTS A total of 253 patients treated between 2009 and 2020 at 16 university hospitals in Germany were included. The median follow up was 27.4 months (range 0.5-130). The median OS and PFS were 13.2 (CI: 10.7 - 15.7) months and 7.9 (CI: 6.7 - 9.1) months, respectively, corresponding to two-year OS and PFS rates of 29 % and 19 %. Rates of locoregional progression and "in-field-failure" were 62 % and 51 % after two years. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified good ECOG performance status and high radiation dose as independent prognostic parameters for OS. Doses above 50 Gy (EQD2) achieved longer median OS of 17.8 months (vs 11.7 months, p < 0.01) and longer PFS of 9.6 months (vs 6.8 months, p < 0.01). In addition, there was a trend for worse survival in patients with tracheostomy (multivariable, p = 0.061). Concomitant systemic therapy did not significantly impact PFS or OS. CONCLUSION Re-irradiation of locally recurrent or second primary HNSCC is efficient, especially if doses above 50 Gy (EQD2) are delivered. ECOG performance score was the strongest prognostic parameter for OS and PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Roesch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Michael Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Maike Trommer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Julia Schleifenbaum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dominik Hering
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Matthias Mäurer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Stefan Knippen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Waltenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens von der Grün
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Daniel Medenwald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - Christoph Süß
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michael Hoeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Lukas Käsmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel F Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Anastassia Löser
- Outpatient Center of the University Medical Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology) and Department of Oncology, Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with the Section Pneumology (Centre for Oncology), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Heß
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Julius-Maximilians-University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Bálint Tamaskovics
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Maria Vinsensia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Markus Hecht
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Verhaegen F, Butterworth KT, Chalmers AJ, Coppes RP, de Ruysscher D, Dobiasch S, Fenwick JD, Granton PV, Heijmans SHJ, Hill MA, Koumenis C, Lauber K, Marples B, Parodi K, Persoon LCGG, Staut N, Subiel A, Vaes RDW, van Hoof S, Verginadis IL, Wilkens JJ, Williams KJ, Wilson GD, Dubois LJ. Roadmap for precision preclinical x-ray radiation studies. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:06RM01. [PMID: 36584393 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acaf45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This Roadmap paper covers the field of precision preclinical x-ray radiation studies in animal models. It is mostly focused on models for cancer and normal tissue response to radiation, but also discusses other disease models. The recent technological evolution in imaging, irradiation, dosimetry and monitoring that have empowered these kinds of studies is discussed, and many developments in the near future are outlined. Finally, clinical translation and reverse translation are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Verhaegen
- MAASTRO Clinic, Radiotherapy Division, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- SmART Scientific Solutions BV, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Karl T Butterworth
- Patrick G. Johnston, Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony J Chalmers
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1QH, United Kingdom
| | - Rob P Coppes
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences of Cells & Systems, Section Molecular Cell Biology and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 AD Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk de Ruysscher
- MAASTRO Clinic, Radiotherapy Division, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Germany
| | - John D Fenwick
- Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering University College LondonMalet Place Engineering Building, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Mark A Hill
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, ORCRB Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom
| | - Constantinos Koumenis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Kirsten Lauber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU München, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Munich, Germany
| | - Brian Marples
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, NY, United States of America
| | - Katia Parodi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Munich, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Garching b. Munich, Germany
| | | | - Nick Staut
- SmART Scientific Solutions BV, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Subiel
- National Physical Laboratory, Medical Radiation Science Hampton Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LW, United Kingdom
| | - Rianne D W Vaes
- MAASTRO Clinic, Radiotherapy Division, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ioannis L Verginadis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Jan J Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Germany
- Physics Department, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | - Kaye J Williams
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - George D Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, MI, United States of America
- Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| | - Ludwig J Dubois
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dapper H, Diehl C, Knebel C, Mogler C, Borm K, Dobiasch S, Combs SE, Peeken JC. Outcome of patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and trunk treated by (neo)adjuvant intensity modulated radiation therapy with curative intent. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:44. [PMID: 36869396 PMCID: PMC9985237 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02238-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a relatively rare group of malignant tumors. Currently, there is very little published clinical data, especially in the context of curative multimodal therapy with image-guided, conformal, intensity-modulated radiotherapy. METHODS Patients who received preoperative or postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy for STS of the extremities or trunk with curative intent were included in this single centre retrospective analysis. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate survival endpoints. Multivariable proportional hazard models were used to investigate the association between survival endpoints and tumour-, patient-, and treatment-specific characteristics. RESULTS 86 patients were included in the analysis. The most common histological subtypes were undifferentiated pleomorphic high-grade sarcoma (UPS) (27) and liposarcoma (22). More than two third of the patients received preoperative radiation therapy (72%). During the follow-up period, 39 patients (45%) suffered from some type of relapse, mainly remote (31%). The two-years overall survival rate was 88%. The median DFS was 48 months and the median DMFS was 51 months. Female gender (HR 0.460 (0.217; 0.973)) and histology of liposarcomas compared to UPS proved to be significantly more favorable in terms of DFS (HR 0.327 (0.126; 0.852)). CONCLUSION Conformal, intensity-modulated radiotherapy is an effective treatment modality in the preoperative or postoperative management of STS. Especially for the prevention of distant metastases, the establishment of modern systemic therapies or multimodal therapy approaches is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hendrik Dapper
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Public Hospital of Bielefeld, University Medical Center East Westphalia-Lippe, Bielefeld, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Christian Diehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carolin Knebel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carolin Mogler
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kai Borm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium Für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site , Munich, Germany.,Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium Für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site , Munich, Germany.,Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Jan C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium Für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site , Munich, Germany.,Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kampfer S, Dobiasch S, Combs SE, Wilkens JJ. Comparison of 3 Positioning Techniques for Fractionated High-precision Radiotherapy in an Orthotopic Mouse Model of Pancreatic Cancer. Comp Med 2022; 72:336-341. [PMID: 36127130 PMCID: PMC9827594 DOI: 10.30802/aalas-cm-22-000060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Small-animal irradiators are widely used in oncologic research, and many experiments use mice to mimic radiation treatments in humans. To improve fractionated high-precision irradiation in mice with orthotopic pancreatic tumors, we evaluated 3 positioning methods: no positioning aid, skin marker, and immobilization devices (immobilization masks). We retrospectively evaluated the translation vector needed for optimal tumor alignment (by shifting the mouse in left-right, in cranio-caudal, and in anterior-posterior direction) on cone-beam CT from our small-animal radiotherapy system. Of the 3 methods, the skin marker method yielded the smallest mean translation vector (3.8 mm) and was the most precise method overall for most of the mice. In addition, the skin marker method required supplemental rotation (that is, roll, pitch, and yaw) for optimal tumor alignment only half as often as positioning without a positioning aid. Finally, the skin marker method had the highest scores for the quality of the fusion results. Overall, we preferred the skin marker method over the other 2 positioning methods with regard to optimal treatment planning and radiotherapy in an orthotopic mouse model of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Severin Kampfer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany and,Physics Department, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Garching, Germany;,Corresponding author:
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany and,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany; and
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany and,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany; and,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Jan J Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany and,Physics Department, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Garching, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Duda MA, Grad A, Kampfer S, Dobiasch S, Combs SE, Wilkens JJ. Dual energy CT for a small animal radiation research platform using an empirical dual energy calibration. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac7770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. Dual energy computed tomography (DECT) has been shown to provide additional image information compared to conventional CT and has been used in clinical routine for several years. The objective of this work is to present a DECT implementation for a Small Animal Radiation Research Platform (SARRP) and to verify it with a quantitative analysis of a material phantom and a qualitative analysis with an ex-vivo mouse measurement. Approach. For dual energy imaging, two different spectra are required, but commercial small animal irradiators are usually not optimized for DECT. We present a method that enables dual energy imaging on a SARRP with sequential scanning and an Empirical Dual Energy Calibration (EDEC). EDEC does not require the exact knowledge of spectra and attenuation coefficients; instead, it is based on a calibration. Due to the SARRP geometry and reconstruction algorithm, the calibration is done using an artificial CT image based on measured values. The calibration yields coefficients to convert the measured images into material decomposed images. Main results. To analyze the method quantitatively, the electron density and the effective atomic number of a material phantom were calculated and compared with theoretical values. The electron density showed a maximum deviation from the theoretical values of less than 5% and the atomic number of slightly more than 6%. For use in mice, DECT is particularly useful in distinguishing iodine contrast agent from bone. A material decomposition of an ex-vivo mouse with iodine contrast agent was material decomposed to show that bone and iodine can be distinguished and iodine-corrected images can be calculated. Significance. DECT is capable of calculating electron density images and effective atomic number images, which are appropriate parameters for quantitative analysis. Furthermore, virtual monochromatic images can be obtained for a better differentiation of materials, especially bone and iodine contrast agent.
Collapse
|
14
|
Giansanti P, Samaras P, Bian Y, Meng C, Coluccio A, Frejno M, Jakubowsky H, Dobiasch S, Hazarika RR, Rechenberger J, Calzada-Wack J, Krumm J, Mueller S, Lee CY, Wimberger N, Lautenbacher L, Hassan Z, Chang YC, Falcomatà C, Bayer FP, Bärthel S, Schmidt T, Rad R, Combs SE, The M, Johannes F, Saur D, de Angelis MH, Wilhelm M, Schneider G, Kuster B. Mass spectrometry-based draft of the mouse proteome. Nat Methods 2022; 19:803-811. [PMID: 35710609 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-022-01526-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
The laboratory mouse ranks among the most important experimental systems for biomedical research and molecular reference maps of such models are essential informational tools. Here, we present a quantitative draft of the mouse proteome and phosphoproteome constructed from 41 healthy tissues and several lines of analyses exemplify which insights can be gleaned from the data. For instance, tissue- and cell-type resolved profiles provide protein evidence for the expression of 17,000 genes, thousands of isoforms and 50,000 phosphorylation sites in vivo. Proteogenomic comparison of mouse, human and Arabidopsis reveal common and distinct mechanisms of gene expression regulation and, despite many similarities, numerous differentially abundant orthologs that likely serve species-specific functions. We leverage the mouse proteome by integrating phenotypic drug (n > 400) and radiation response data with the proteomes of 66 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cell lines to reveal molecular markers for sensitivity and resistance. This unique atlas complements other molecular resources for the mouse and can be explored online via ProteomicsDB and PACiFIC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piero Giansanti
- Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Patroklos Samaras
- Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Yangyang Bian
- Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.,College of Life Science, Northwest University, Xi'an, China
| | - Chen Meng
- Bavarian Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry Center, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Andrea Coluccio
- Division of Translational Cancer Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Chair of Translational Cancer Research and Institute for Experimental Cancer Therapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Center for Translational Cancer Research (TranslaTUM), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Frejno
- Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Hannah Jakubowsky
- Division of Translational Cancer Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Chair of Translational Cancer Research and Institute for Experimental Cancer Therapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Center for Translational Cancer Research (TranslaTUM), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rashmi R Hazarika
- Population epigenetics and epigenomics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.,Institute of Advanced Study (IAS), Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Julia Rechenberger
- Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Julia Calzada-Wack
- Institute of Experimental Genetics, German Mouse Clinic, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Krumm
- Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Sebastian Mueller
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Center for Translational Cancer Research (TranslaTUM), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Molecular Oncology and Functional Genomics, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Chien-Yun Lee
- Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Nicole Wimberger
- Division of Translational Cancer Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Chair of Translational Cancer Research and Institute for Experimental Cancer Therapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Center for Translational Cancer Research (TranslaTUM), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ludwig Lautenbacher
- Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Zonera Hassan
- Medical Clinic and Policlinic II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Yun-Chien Chang
- Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Chiara Falcomatà
- Division of Translational Cancer Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Chair of Translational Cancer Research and Institute for Experimental Cancer Therapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Center for Translational Cancer Research (TranslaTUM), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian P Bayer
- Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Stefanie Bärthel
- Division of Translational Cancer Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Chair of Translational Cancer Research and Institute for Experimental Cancer Therapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Center for Translational Cancer Research (TranslaTUM), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tobias Schmidt
- Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Roland Rad
- Division of Translational Cancer Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Center for Translational Cancer Research (TranslaTUM), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Molecular Oncology and Functional Genomics, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthew The
- Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Frank Johannes
- Population epigenetics and epigenomics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.,Institute of Advanced Study (IAS), Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Dieter Saur
- Division of Translational Cancer Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Chair of Translational Cancer Research and Institute for Experimental Cancer Therapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Center for Translational Cancer Research (TranslaTUM), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Hrabe de Angelis
- Institute of Experimental Genetics, German Mouse Clinic, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.,Chair of Experimental Genetics, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.,German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Mathias Wilhelm
- Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.,Computational Mass Spectrometry, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Günter Schneider
- Medical Clinic and Policlinic II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Kuster
- Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany. .,Bavarian Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry Center, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany. .,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Institute of Advanced Study (IAS), Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kampfer S, Duda MA, Dobiasch S, Combs SE, Wilkens JJ. A comprehensive and efficient quality assurance program for an image-guided small animal irradiation system. Z Med Phys 2022; 32:261-272. [PMID: 35370028 PMCID: PMC9948878 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In the field of preclinical radiotherapy, many new developments were driven by technical innovations. To make research of different groups comparable in that context and reliable, high quality has to be maintained. Therefore, standardized protocols and programs should be used. Here we present a guideline for a comprehensive and efficient quality assurance program for an image-guided small animal irradiation system, which is meant to test all the involved subsystems (imaging, treatment planning, and the irradiation system in terms of geometric accuracy and dosimetric aspects) as well as the complete procedure (end-to-end test) in a time efficient way. The suggestions are developed on a Small Animal Radiation Research Platform (SARRP) from Xstrahl (Xstrahl Ltd., Camberley, UK) and are presented together with proposed frequencies (from monthly to yearly) and experiences on the duration of each test. All output and energy related measurements showed stable results within small variation. Also, the motorized parts (couch, gantry) and other geometrical alignments were very stable. For the checks of the imaging system, the results are highly dependent on the chosen protocol and differ according to the settings. We received nevertheless stable and comparably good results for our mainly used protocol. All investigated aspects of treatment planning were exactly fulfilled and also the end-to-end test showed satisfying values. The mean overall time we needed for our checks to have a well monitored machine is less than two hours per month.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Severin Kampfer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich, Germany; Physics Department, Technical University of Munich (TUM), James-Franck-Str. 1, 85748, Garching, Germany.
| | - Manuela A. Duda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich, Germany,Physics Department, Technical University of Munich (TUM), James-Franck-Str. 1, 85748, Garching, Germany
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich, Germany,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Jan J. Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich, Germany,Physics Department, Technical University of Munich (TUM), James-Franck-Str. 1, 85748, Garching, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dobiasch S, Kampfer S, Steiger K, Schilling D, Fischer JC, Schmid TE, Weichert W, Wilkens JJ, Combs SE. Histopathological Tumor and Normal Tissue Responses after 3D-Planned Arc Radiotherapy in an Orthotopic Xenograft Mouse Model of Human Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5656. [PMID: 34830813 PMCID: PMC8616260 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal human cancers. Innovative treatment concepts may enhance oncological outcome. Clinically relevant tumor models are essential in developing new therapeutic strategies. In the present study, we used two human PDAC cell lines for an orthotopic xenograft mouse model and compared treatment characteristics between this in vivo tumor model and PDAC patients. Tumor-bearing mice received stereotactic high-precision irradiation using arc technique after 3D-treatment planning. Induction of DNA damage in tumors and organs at risk (OARs) was histopathologically analyzed by the DNA damage marker γH2AX and compared with results after unprecise whole-abdomen irradiation. Our mouse model and preclinical setup reflect the characteristics of PDAC patients and clinical RT. It was feasible to perform stereotactic high-precision RT after defining tumor and OARs by CT imaging. After stereotactic RT, a high rate of DNA damage was mainly observed in the tumor but not in OARs. The calculated dose distributions and the extent of the irradiation field correlate with histopathological staining and the clinical example. We established and validated 3D-planned stereotactic RT in an orthotopic PDAC mouse model, which reflects the human RT. The efficacy of the whole workflow of imaging, treatment planning, and high-precision RT was proven by longitudinal analysis showing a significant improved survival. Importantly, this model can be used to analyze tumor regression and therapy-related toxicity in one model and will allow drawing clinically relevant conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (S.K.); (D.S.); (J.C.F.); (T.E.S.); (J.J.W.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany;
| | - Severin Kampfer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (S.K.); (D.S.); (J.C.F.); (T.E.S.); (J.J.W.); (S.E.C.)
- Physics Department, Technical University of Munich (TUM), James-Franck-Str. 1, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - Katja Steiger
- Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Trogerstr. 18, 81675 Munich, Germany;
- Comparative Experimental Pathology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Trogerstr. 18, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Daniela Schilling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (S.K.); (D.S.); (J.C.F.); (T.E.S.); (J.J.W.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Julius C. Fischer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (S.K.); (D.S.); (J.C.F.); (T.E.S.); (J.J.W.); (S.E.C.)
| | - Thomas E. Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (S.K.); (D.S.); (J.C.F.); (T.E.S.); (J.J.W.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Wilko Weichert
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany;
- Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Trogerstr. 18, 81675 Munich, Germany;
| | - Jan J. Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (S.K.); (D.S.); (J.C.F.); (T.E.S.); (J.J.W.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Physics Department, Technical University of Munich (TUM), James-Franck-Str. 1, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (S.K.); (D.S.); (J.C.F.); (T.E.S.); (J.J.W.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Burkhardt R, Gora T, Fingerle AA, Sauter AP, Meurer F, Gassert FT, Dobiasch S, Schilling D, Feuchtinger A, Walch AK, Multhoff G, Herzen J, Noël PB, Rummeny EJ, Combs SE, Schmid TE, Pfeiffer F, Wilkens JJ. In-vivo X-ray dark-field computed tomography for the detection of radiation-induced lung damage in mice. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 20:11-16. [PMID: 34611553 PMCID: PMC8476771 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2021.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation-induced lung damage was observed using X-ray dark-field tomography. In this pre-clinical study, mouse lungs were irradiated and subsequently imaged. We report increased sensitivity of X-ray dark-field tomography over absorption-based tomography.
Background and Purpose Radiotherapy of thoracic tumours can lead to side effects in the lung, which may benefit from early diagnosis. We investigated the potential of X-ray dark-field computed tomography by a proof-of-principle murine study in a clinically relevant radiotherapeutic setting aiming at the detection of radiation-induced lung damage. Material and Methods Six mice were irradiated with 20 Gy to the entire right lung. Together with five unirradiated control mice, they were imaged using computed tomography with absorption and dark-field contrast before and 16 weeks post irradiation. Mean pixel values for the right and left lung were calculated for both contrasts, and the right-to-left-ratio R of these means was compared. Radiologists also assessed the tomograms acquired 16 weeks post irradiation. Sensitivity, specificity, inter- and intra-reader accuracy were evaluated. Results In absorption contrast the group-average of R showed no increase in the control group and increased by 7% (p = 0.005) in the irradiated group. In dark-field contrast, it increased by 2% in the control group and by 14% (p = 0.005) in the irradiated group. Specificity was 100% for both contrasts but sensitivity was almost four times higher using dark-field tomography. Two cases were missed by absorption tomography but were detected by dark-field tomography. Conclusions The applicability of X-ray dark-field computed tomography for the detection of radiation-induced lung damage was demonstrated in a pre-clinical mouse model. The presented results illustrate the differences between dark-field and absorption contrast and show that dark-field tomography could be advantageous in future clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rico Burkhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.,Physics Department, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Thomas Gora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander A Fingerle
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas P Sauter
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Felix Meurer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian T Gassert
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Daniela Schilling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Annette Feuchtinger
- Abteilung Analytische Pathologie, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Axel K Walch
- Abteilung Analytische Pathologie, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Gabriele Multhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.,TranslaTUM, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Herzen
- Physics Department, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.,Chair of Biomedical Physics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.,Munich School of BioEngineering (MSB), Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Peter B Noël
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Ernst J Rummeny
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas E Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Franz Pfeiffer
- Physics Department, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Chair of Biomedical Physics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.,Munich School of BioEngineering (MSB), Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Jan J Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Physics Department, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.,Chair of Biomedical Physics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Roesch J, Oertel M, Fabian A, Höck M, von der Grün J, Löser A, Süss C, Vinsensia M, Tamaskovics B, Heß S, Waltenberger M, Wegen S, Trommer M, Mäurer M, Medenwald D, Rühle A, Käsmann L, Fleischmann D, Dobiasch S, Hecht M. PH-0054 Re-Irradiation in head & neck cancer - a pooled analysis of 253 individual cases. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)07236-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
19
|
Nguyen L, Dobiasch S, Schneider G, Schmid RM, Azimzadeh O, Kanev K, Buschmann D, Pfaffl MW, Bartzsch S, Schmid TE, Schilling D, Combs SE. Impact of DNA repair and reactive oxygen species levels on radioresistance in pancreatic cancer. Radiother Oncol 2021; 159:265-276. [PMID: 33839203 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.03.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radioresistance in pancreatic cancer patients remains a critical obstacle to overcome. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying radioresistance may achieve better response to radiotherapy and thereby improving the poor treatment outcome. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the mechanisms leading to radioresistance by detailed characterization of isogenic radioresistant and radiosensitive cell lines. METHODS The human pancreatic cancer cell lines, Panc-1 and MIA PaCa-2 were repeatedly exposed to radiation to generate radioresistant (RR) isogenic cell lines. The surviving cells were expanded, and their radiosensitivity was measured using colony formation assay. Tumor growth delay after irradiation was determined in a mouse pancreatic cancer xenograft model. Gene and protein expression were analyzed using RNA sequencing and Western blot, respectively. Cell cycle distribution and apoptosis (Caspase 3/7) were measured by FACS analysis. Reactive oxygen species generation and DNA damage were analyzed by detection of CM-H2DCFDA and γH2AX staining, respectively. Transwell chamber assays were used to investigate cell migration and invasion. RESULTS The acquired radioresistance of RR cell lines was demonstrated in vitro and validated in vivo. Ingenuity pathway analysis of RNA sequencing data predicted activation of cell viability in both RR cell lines. RR cancer cell lines demonstrated greater DNA repair efficiency and lower basal and radiation-induced reactive oxygen species levels. Migration and invasion were differentially affected in RR cell lines. CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that repeated exposure to irradiation increases the expression of genes involved in cell viability and thereby leads to radioresistance. Mechanistically, increased DNA repair capacity and reduced oxidative stress might contribute to the radioresistant phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lily Nguyen
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany; Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Günter Schneider
- Department of Medicine II, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany; Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roland M Schmid
- Department of Medicine II, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | - Omid Azimzadeh
- Institute of Radiation Biology (ISB), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Kristiyan Kanev
- Division of Animal Physiology and Immunology, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Freising, Germany
| | - Dominik Buschmann
- Division of Animal Physiology and Immunology, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Freising, Germany
| | - Michael W Pfaffl
- Division of Animal Physiology and Immunology, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Freising, Germany
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | - Thomas E Schmid
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | - Daniela Schilling
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany; Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ostheimer C, Mäurer M, Ebert N, Schmitt D, Krug D, Baumann R, Henkenberens C, Giordano FA, Sautter L, López G, Fleischmann DF, Niyazi M, Käsmann L, Kaul D, Thieme AH, Billiet C, Dobiasch S, Arnold CR, Oertel M, Haussmann J, Gauer T, Goy Y, Suess C, Ziegler S, Panje CM, Baues C, Trommer M, Skripcak T, Medenwald D. Correction to: Prognostic impact of gross tumor volume during radical radiochemotherapy of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer-results from the NCT03055715 multicenter cohort study of the Young DEGRO Trial Group. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:560-561. [PMID: 33674905 PMCID: PMC8154766 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01750-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C Ostheimer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06110, Halle (Saale), Germany.
| | - M Mäurer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - N Ebert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
| | - D Schmitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - D Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - C Henkenberens
- Department of Radiation and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - F A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - L Sautter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Guerra López
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - D F Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,partner site Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,partner site Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - L Käsmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - D Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité School of Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Campus Virchow-Klinikum, University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - A H Thieme
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité School of Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - C Billiet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Kankernetwerk, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - S Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - C R Arnold
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - M Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - J Haussmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - T Gauer
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Y Goy
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - C Suess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - S Ziegler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - C M Panje
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - C Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - M Trommer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - T Skripcak
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany
| | - D Medenwald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06110, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ostheimer C, Mäurer M, Ebert N, Schmitt D, Krug D, Baumann R, Henkenberens C, Giordano FA, Sautter L, López G, Fleischmann DF, Niyazi M, Käsmann L, Kaul D, Thieme AH, Billiet C, Dobiasch S, Arnold CR, Oertel M, Haussmann J, Gauer T, Goy Y, Suess C, Ziegler S, Panje CM, Baues C, Trommer M, Skripcak T, Medenwald D. Prognostic impact of gross tumor volume during radical radiochemotherapy of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer-results from the NCT03055715 multicenter cohort study of the Young DEGRO Trial Group. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:385-395. [PMID: 33410959 PMCID: PMC8062351 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01727-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In radical radiochemotherapy (RCT) of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) typical prognostic factors include T- and N-stage, while there are still conflicting data on the prognostic relevance of gross tumor volume (GTV) and particularly its changes during RCT. The NCT03055715 study of the Young DEGRO working group of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) evaluated the prognostic impact of GTV and its changes during RCT. METHODS A total of 21 university centers for radiation oncology from five different European countries (Germany, Switzerland, Spain, Belgium, and Austria) participated in the study which evaluated n = 347 patients with confirmed (biopsy) inoperable NSCLC in UICC stage III A/B who received radical curative-intent RCT between 2010 and 2013. Patient and disease data were collected anonymously via electronic case report forms and entered into the multi-institutional RadPlanBio platform for central data analysis. GTV before RCT (initial planning CT, GTV1) and at 40-50 Gy (re-planning CT for radiation boost, GTV2) was delineated. Absolute GTV before/during RCT and relative GTV changes were correlated with overall survival as the primary endpoint. Hazard ratios (HR) of survival analysis were estimated by means of adjusted Cox regression models. RESULTS GTV1 was found to have a mean of 154.4 ml (95%CI: 1.5-877) and GTV2 of 106.2 ml (95% CI: 0.5-589.5), resulting in an estimated reduction of 48.2 ml (p < 0.001). Median overall survival (OS) was 18.8 months with a median of 22.1, 20.9, and 12.6 months for patients with high, intermediate, and low GTV before RT. Considering all patients, in one survival model of overall mortality, GTV2 (2.75 (1.12-6.75, p = 0.03) was found to be a stronger survival predictor than GTV1 (1.34 (0.9-2, p > 0.05). In patients with available data on both GTV1 and GTV2, absolute GTV1 before RT was not significantly associated with survival (HR 0-69, 0.32-1.49, p > 0.05) but GTV2 significantly predicted OS in a model adjusted for age, T stage, and chemotherapy, with an HR of 3.7 (1.01-13.53, p = 0.04) per 300 ml. The absolute decrease from GTV1 to GTV2 was correlated to survival, where every decrease by 50 ml reduced the HR by 0.8 (CI 0.64-0.99, p = 0.04). There was no evidence for a survival effect of the relative change between GTV1 and GTV2. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that independently of T stage, the re-planning GTV during RCT is a significant and superior survival predictor compared to baseline GTV before RT. Patients with a high absolute (rather than relative) change in GTV during RT show a superior survival outcome after RCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Ostheimer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06110, Halle (Saale), Germany.
| | - M Mäurer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - N Ebert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
| | - D Schmitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - D Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - C Henkenberens
- Department of Radiation and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - F A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - L Sautter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Guerra López
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - D F Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,partner site Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,partner site Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - L Käsmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - D Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité School of Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Campus Virchow-Klinikum, University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - A H Thieme
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité School of Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - C Billiet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Kankernetwerk, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - S Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - C R Arnold
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - M Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - J Haussmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - T Gauer
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Y Goy
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - C Suess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - S Ziegler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - C M Panje
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - C Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - M Trommer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - T Skripcak
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany
| | - D Medenwald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06110, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nguyen L, Schilling D, Dobiasch S, Raulefs S, Santiago Franco M, Buschmann D, Pfaffl MW, Schmid TE, Combs SE. The Emerging Role of miRNAs for the Radiation Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12123703. [PMID: 33317198 PMCID: PMC7763922 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive disease with a high mortality rate. Radiotherapy is one treatment option within a multimodal therapy approach for patients with locally advanced, non-resectable pancreatic tumors. However, radiotherapy is only effective in about one-third of the patients. Therefore, biomarkers that can predict the response to radiotherapy are of utmost importance. Recently, microRNAs, small non-coding RNAs regulating gene expression, have come into focus as there is growing evidence that microRNAs could serve as diagnostic, predictive and prognostic biomarkers in various cancer entities, including pancreatic cancer. Moreover, their high stability in body fluids such as serum and plasma render them attractive candidates for non-invasive biomarkers. This article describes the role of microRNAs as suitable blood biomarkers and outlines an overview of radiation-induced microRNAs changes and the association with radioresistance in pancreatic cancer. Abstract Today, pancreatic cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide with a five-year overall survival rate of less than 7%. Only 15–20% of patients are eligible for curative intent surgery at the time of diagnosis. Therefore, neoadjuvant treatment regimens have been introduced in order to downsize the tumor by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. To further increase the efficacy of radiotherapy, novel molecular biomarkers are urgently needed to define the subgroup of pancreatic cancer patients who would benefit most from radiotherapy. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) could have the potential to serve as novel predictive and prognostic biomarkers in patients with pancreatic cancer. In the present article, the role of miRNAs as blood biomarkers, which are associated with either radioresistance or radiation-induced changes of miRNAs in pancreatic cancer, is discussed. Furthermore, the manuscript provides own data of miRNAs identified in a pancreatic cancer mouse model as well as radiation-induced miRNA changes in the plasma of tumor-bearing mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lily Nguyen
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (L.N.); (D.S.); (S.D.); (S.R.); (M.S.F.); (T.E.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Daniela Schilling
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (L.N.); (D.S.); (S.D.); (S.R.); (M.S.F.); (T.E.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (L.N.); (D.S.); (S.D.); (S.R.); (M.S.F.); (T.E.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Susanne Raulefs
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (L.N.); (D.S.); (S.D.); (S.R.); (M.S.F.); (T.E.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Marina Santiago Franco
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (L.N.); (D.S.); (S.D.); (S.R.); (M.S.F.); (T.E.S.)
| | - Dominik Buschmann
- Division of Animal Physiology and Immunology, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 85354 Freising, Germany; (D.B.); (M.W.P.)
| | - Michael W. Pfaffl
- Division of Animal Physiology and Immunology, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 85354 Freising, Germany; (D.B.); (M.W.P.)
| | - Thomas E. Schmid
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (L.N.); (D.S.); (S.D.); (S.R.); (M.S.F.); (T.E.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (L.N.); (D.S.); (S.D.); (S.R.); (M.S.F.); (T.E.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-89-4140-4501
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kampfer S, Dobiasch S, Combs S, Wilkens J. PO-1314: Creation of a 3D-printed plastic mouse phantom for pre-clinical dosimetry and quality assurance. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)01332-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
24
|
Wiechmann S, Saupp E, Schilling D, Heinzlmeir S, Schneider G, Schmid RM, Combs SE, Kuster B, Dobiasch S. Radiosensitization by Kinase Inhibition Revealed by Phosphoproteomic Analysis of Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Mol Cell Proteomics 2020; 19:1649-1663. [PMID: 32651227 PMCID: PMC8014995 DOI: 10.1074/mcp.ra120.002046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive cancers and known for its extensive genetic heterogeneity, high therapeutic resistance, and strong variation in intrinsic radiosensitivity. To understand the molecular mechanisms underlying radioresistance, we screened the phenotypic response of 38 PDAC cell lines to ionizing radiation. Subsequent phosphoproteomic analysis of two representative sensitive and resistant lines led to the reproducible identification of 7,800 proteins and 13,000 phosphorylation sites (p-sites). Approximately 700 p-sites on 400 proteins showed abundance changes after radiation in all cell lines regardless of their phenotypic sensitivity. Apart from recapitulating known radiation response phosphorylation markers such as on proteins involved in DNA damage repair, the analysis uncovered many novel members of a radiation-responsive signaling network that was apparent only at the level of protein phosphorylation. These regulated p-sites were enriched in potential ATM substrates and in vitro kinase assays corroborated 10 of these. Comparing the proteomes and phosphoproteomes of radiosensitive and -resistant cells pointed to additional tractable radioresistance mechanisms involving apoptotic proteins. For instance, elevated NADPH quinine oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) expression in radioresistant cells may aid in clearing harmful reactive oxygen species. Resistant cells also showed elevated phosphorylation levels of proteins involved in cytoskeleton organization including actin dynamics and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activity and one resistant cell line showed a strong migration phenotype. Pharmacological inhibition of the kinases FAK by Defactinib and of CHEK1 by Rabusertib showed a statistically significant sensitization to radiation in radioresistant PDAC cells. Together, the presented data map a comprehensive molecular network of radiation-induced signaling, improves the understanding of radioresistance and provides avenues for developing radiotherapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svenja Wiechmann
- Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elena Saupp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniela Schilling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie Heinzlmeir
- Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Günter Schneider
- Medical Clinic and Polyclinic II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, München, Germany
| | - Roland M Schmid
- Medical Clinic and Polyclinic II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, München, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Kuster
- Chair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Bavarian Center for Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- German Cancer Consortium, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Schwarz K, Dobiasch S, Nguyen L, Schilling D, Combs SE. Modification of radiosensitivity by Curcumin in human pancreatic cancer cell lines. Sci Rep 2020; 10:3815. [PMID: 32123256 PMCID: PMC7052161 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60765-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive malignancies and is characterized by a low 5-year survival rate, a broad genetic diversity and a high resistance to conventional therapies. As a result, novel therapeutic agents to improve the current situation are needed urgently. Curcumin, a polyphenolic colorant derived from Curcuma longa root, showed pleiotropic influences on cellular pathways in vitro and amongst others anti-cancer properties including sensitization of tumor cells to chemo- and radiation-therapy. In this study, we evaluated the impact of Curcumin on the radiosensitivity of the established human pancreatic cancer cell lines Panc-1 and MiaPaCa-2 in vitro. In contrast to MiaPaCa-2 cells, we found a significant radiosensitization by Curcumin in the more radioresistant Panc-1 cells, possibly caused by cell cycle arrest in the most radiation-sensitive G2/M-phase at the time of irradiation. Furthermore, a significant enhancement of radiation-induced apoptosis, DNA-double-strand breaks and G2/M-arrest after curcumin treatment was observed in both cell lines. These in vitro findings suggest that especially patients with more radioresistant tumors could benefit from a radiation-concomitant, phytotherapeutic therapy with Curcumin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Schwarz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. .,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Lily Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Daniela Schilling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sammer M, Zahnbrecher E, Dobiasch S, Girst S, Greubel C, Ilicic K, Reindl J, Schwarz B, Siebenwirth C, Walsh DWM, Combs SE, Dollinger G, Schmid TE. Proton pencil minibeam irradiation of an in-vivo mouse ear model spares healthy tissue dependent on beam size. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0224873. [PMID: 31765436 PMCID: PMC6876838 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton radiotherapy using minibeams of sub-millimeter dimensions reduces side effects in comparison to conventional proton therapy due to spatial fractionation. Since the proton minibeams widen with depth, the homogeneous irradiation of a tumor can be ensured by adjusting the beam distances to tumor size and depth to maintain tumor control as in conventional proton therapy. The inherent advantages of protons in comparison to photons like a limited range that prevents a dosage of distal tissues are maintained by proton minibeams and can even be exploited for interlacing from different beam directions. A first animal study was conducted to systematically investigate and quantify the tissue-sparing effects of proton pencil minibeams as a function of beam size and dose distributions, using beam widths between σ = 95, 199, 306, 411, 561 and 883 μm (standard deviation) at a defined center-to-center beam distance (ctc) of 1.8 mm. The average dose of 60 Gy was distributed in 4x4 minibeams using 20 MeV protons (LET ~ 2.7 keV/μm). The induced radiation toxicities were measured by visible skin reactions and ear swelling for 90 days after irradiation. The largest applied beam size to ctc ratio (σ/ctc = 0.49) is similar to a homogeneous irradiation and leads to a significant 3-fold ear thickness increase compared to the control group. Erythema and desquamation was also increased significantly 3–4 weeks after irradiation. With decreasing beam sizes and thus decreasing σ/ctc, the maximum skin reactions are strongly reduced until no ear swelling or other visible skin reactions should occur for σ/ctc < 0.032 (extrapolated from data). These results demonstrate that proton pencil minibeam radiotherapy has better tissue-sparing for smaller σ/ctc, corresponding to larger peak-to-valley dose ratios PVDR, with the best effect for σ/ctc < 0.032. However, even quite large σ/ctc (e.g. σ/ctc = 0.23 or 0.31, i.e. PVDR = 10 or 2.7) show less acute side effects than a homogeneous dose distribution. This suggests that proton minibeam therapy spares healthy tissue not only in the skin but even for dose distributions appearing in deeper layers close to the tumor enhancing its benefits for clinical proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Sammer
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Esther Zahnbrecher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Oberschleißheim, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Girst
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Greubel
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Katarina Ilicic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Oberschleißheim, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Judith Reindl
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Schwarz
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Christian Siebenwirth
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Dietrich W M Walsh
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Oberschleißheim, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Günther Dollinger
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Thomas E Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dobiasch S, Kampfer S, Schilling D, Wilkens J, Combs S. Radiation Response after High-Precision Radiotherapy in an Orthotopic Pancreatic Tumor Mouse Model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
28
|
Ostheimer C, Baues C, Baumann R, Billiet C, Dobiasch S, Ebert N, Fleischmann D, Gauer T, Goy Y, Haussmann J, Henkenberens C, Kaessmann L, López guerra J, Kaul D, Krug D, Maeurer M, Niyazi M, Oertel M, Panje C, Sautter L, Schmitt D, Suess C, Trommer-Nestler M, Ziegler S, Medenwald D. OC-0329: Predictive value of GTV in radiotherapy of NSCLC - early results of the NCT03055715 trial. Radiother Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)30639-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
29
|
Kessel KA, Vogel MM, Alles A, Dobiasch S, Fischer H, Combs SE. Mobile App Delivery of the EORTC QLQ-C30 Questionnaire to Assess Health-Related Quality of Life in Oncological Patients: Usability Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018; 6:e45. [PMID: 29463489 PMCID: PMC5840479 DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.9486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2017] [Revised: 12/27/2017] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Mobile apps are evolving in the medical field. However, ongoing discussions have questioned whether such apps are really valuable and whether patients will accept their use in day-to-day clinical life. Therefore, we initiated a usability study in our department. Objective We present our results of the first app prototype and patient testing of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment in oncological patients. Methods We developed an app prototype for the iOS operating system within eight months in three phases: conception, initial development, and pilot testing. For the HRQoL assessment, we chose to implement only the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30; German version 3). Usability testing was conducted for three months. Participation was voluntary and pseudonymized. After completion of the QLQ-C30 questionnaire using iPads provided by our department, we performed a short survey with 10 questions. This survey inquired about patients’ opinions regarding general aspects, including technical advances in medicine, mobile and app assistance during cancer treatment, and the app-specific functions (eg, interface and navigation). Results After logging into the app, the user can choose between starting a questionnaire, reviewing answers (administrators only), and logging out. The questionnaire is displayed with the same information, questions, and answers as on the original QLQ-C30 sheet. No alterations in wording were made. Usability was tested with 81 patients; median age was 55 years. The median time for completing the HRQoL questionnaire on the iPad was 4.0 minutes. Of all participants, 84% (68/81) owned a mobile device. Similarly, 84% (68/81) of participants would prefer a mobile version of the HRQoL questionnaire instead of a paper-based version. Using the app in daily life during and after cancer treatment would be supported by 83% (67/81) of participants. In the prototype version of the app, data were stored on the device; in the future, 79% (64/81) of the patients would agree to transfer data via the Internet. Conclusions Our usability test showed good results regarding attractiveness, operability, and understandability. Moreover, our results demonstrate a high overall acceptance of mobile apps and telemedicine in oncology. The HRQoL assessment via the app was accepted thoroughly by patients, and individuals are keen to use it in clinical routines, while data privacy and security must be ensured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin A Kessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute for Innovative Radiotherapy, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Marco Me Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute for Innovative Radiotherapy, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Anna Alles
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Hanna Fischer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute for Innovative Radiotherapy, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Dobiasch S, Szanyi S, Kjaev A, Werner J, Strauss A, Weis C, Grenacher L, Kapilov-Buchman K, Israel LL, Lellouche JP, Locatelli E, Franchini MC, Vandooren J, Opdenakker G, Felix K. Synthesis and functionalization of protease-activated nanoparticles with tissue plasminogen activator peptides as targeting moiety and diagnostic tool for pancreatic cancer. J Nanobiotechnology 2016; 14:81. [PMID: 27993133 PMCID: PMC5168863 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-016-0236-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Accepted: 12/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Functionalized nanoparticles (NPs) are one promising tool for detecting specific molecular targets and combine molecular biology and nanotechnology aiming at modern imaging. We aimed at ligand-directed delivery with a suitable target-biomarker to detect early pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Promising targets are galectins (Gal), due to their strong expression in and on PDAC-cells and occurrence at early stages in cancer precursor lesions, but not in adjacent normal tissues. Results Molecular probes (10-29 AA long peptides) derived from human tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) were selected as binding partners to galectins. Affinity constants between the synthesized t-PA peptides and Gal were determined by microscale thermophoresis. The 29 AA-long t-PA-peptide-1 with a lactose-functionalized serine revealed the strongest binding properties to Gal-1 which was 25-fold higher in comparison with the native t-PA protein and showed additional strong binding to Gal-3 and Gal-4, both also over-expressed in PDAC. t-PA-peptide-1 was selected as vector moiety and linked covalently onto the surface of biodegradable iron oxide nanoparticles (NPs). In particular, CAN-doped maghemite NPs (CAN-Mag), promising as contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), were selected as magnetic core and coated with different biocompatible polymers, such as chitosan (CAN-Mag-Chitosan NPs) or polylactic co glycolic acid (PLGA) obtaining polymeric nanoparticles (CAN-Mag@PNPs), already approved for drug delivery applications. The binding efficacy of t-PA-vectorized NPs determined by exposure to different pancreatic cell lines was up to 90%, as assessed by flow cytometry. The in vivo targeting and imaging efficacy of the vectorized NPs were evaluated by applying murine pancreatic tumor models and assessed by 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The t-PA-vectorized NPs as well as the protease-activated NPs with outer shell decoration (CAN-Mag@PNPs-PEG-REGAcp-PEG/tPA-pep1Lac) showed clearly detectable drop of subcutaneous and orthotopic tumor staining-intensity indicating a considerable uptake of the injected NPs. Post mortem NP deposition in tumors and organs was confirmed by Fe staining of histopathology tissue sections. Conclusions The targeted NPs indicate a fast and enhanced deposition of NPs in the murine tumor models. The CAN-Mag@PNPs-PEG-REGAcp-PEG/tPA-pep1Lac interlocking steps strategy of NPs delivery and deposition in pancreatic tumor is promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Szilard Szanyi
- Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aleko Kjaev
- Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Werner
- Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of General-, Visceral-, Transplantations-, Vascular- and Thorax-Surgery LMU Munich, München, Germany
| | - Albert Strauss
- Department of Radiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Weis
- Department of Radiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lars Grenacher
- Department of Radiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Diagnostik München, Diagnostic Imaging and Prevention Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Katya Kapilov-Buchman
- Nanomaterials Research Center, Institute for Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Liron-Limor Israel
- Nanomaterials Research Center, Institute for Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Jean-Paul Lellouche
- Nanomaterials Research Center, Institute for Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Erica Locatelli
- Department of Industrial Chemistry Toso Montanari, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mauro Comes Franchini
- Department of Industrial Chemistry Toso Montanari, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Jennifer Vandooren
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ghislain Opdenakker
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Klaus Felix
- Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rosenberger I, Strauss A, Dobiasch S, Weis C, Szanyi S, Gil-Iceta L, Alonso E, González Esparza M, Gómez-Vallejo V, Szczupak B, Plaza-García S, Mirzaei S, Israel LL, Bianchessi S, Scanziani E, Lellouche JP, Knoll P, Werner J, Felix K, Grenacher L, Reese T, Kreuter J, Jiménez-González M. Targeted diagnostic magnetic nanoparticles for medical imaging of pancreatic cancer. J Control Release 2015; 214:76-84. [PMID: 26192099 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Revised: 07/14/2015] [Accepted: 07/15/2015] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Highly aggressive cancer types such as pancreatic cancer possess a mortality rate of up to 80% within the first 6months after diagnosis. To reduce this high mortality rate, more sensitive diagnostic tools allowing an early stage medical imaging of even very small tumours are needed. For this purpose, magnetic, biodegradable nanoparticles prepared using recombinant human serum albumin (rHSA) and incorporated iron oxide (maghemite, γ-Fe2O3) nanoparticles were developed. Galectin-1 has been chosen as target receptor as this protein is upregulated in pancreatic cancer and its precursor lesions but not in healthy pancreatic tissue nor in pancreatitis. Tissue plasminogen activator derived peptides (t-PA-ligands), that have a high affinity to galectin-1 have been chosen as target moieties and were covalently attached onto the nanoparticle surface. Improved targeting and imaging properties were shown in mice using single photon emission computed tomography-computer tomography (SPECT-CT), a handheld gamma camera, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Rosenberger
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Biocenter Niederursel, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Wilhelimnenspital, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Montleartstr. 37, 1160 Wien, Austria
| | - A Strauss
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Dobiasch
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Weis
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Szanyi
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - L Gil-Iceta
- CIC biomaGUNE, Molecular Imaging Unit, Paseo Miramón No 182, Parque Tecnológico de San Sebastián, 20009 San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, Spain
| | - E Alonso
- CIC biomaGUNE, Molecular Imaging Unit, Paseo Miramón No 182, Parque Tecnológico de San Sebastián, 20009 San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, Spain
| | - M González Esparza
- CIC biomaGUNE, Molecular Imaging Unit, Paseo Miramón No 182, Parque Tecnológico de San Sebastián, 20009 San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, Spain
| | - V Gómez-Vallejo
- CIC biomaGUNE, Molecular Imaging Unit, Paseo Miramón No 182, Parque Tecnológico de San Sebastián, 20009 San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, Spain
| | - B Szczupak
- CIC biomaGUNE, Molecular Imaging Unit, Paseo Miramón No 182, Parque Tecnológico de San Sebastián, 20009 San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, Spain
| | - S Plaza-García
- CIC biomaGUNE, Molecular Imaging Unit, Paseo Miramón No 182, Parque Tecnológico de San Sebastián, 20009 San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, Spain
| | - S Mirzaei
- Wilhelimnenspital, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Montleartstr. 37, 1160 Wien, Austria
| | - L L Israel
- Department of Chemistry & Institute of Nanotechnology & Advanced Materials, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 5290002, Israel
| | - S Bianchessi
- Fondazione Filarete, Viale Ortles 22/4, 20139 Milano, Italy
| | - E Scanziani
- Fondazione Filarete, Viale Ortles 22/4, 20139 Milano, Italy
| | - J-P Lellouche
- Department of Chemistry & Institute of Nanotechnology & Advanced Materials, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 5290002, Israel
| | - P Knoll
- Wilhelimnenspital, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Montleartstr. 37, 1160 Wien, Austria
| | - J Werner
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Department of General-, Visceral-, Transplantation-, Vascular- and Thorax-Surgery LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - K Felix
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - L Grenacher
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Reese
- CIC biomaGUNE, Molecular Imaging Unit, Paseo Miramón No 182, Parque Tecnológico de San Sebastián, 20009 San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, Spain
| | - J Kreuter
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Biocenter Niederursel, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
| | - M Jiménez-González
- CIC biomaGUNE, Molecular Imaging Unit, Paseo Miramón No 182, Parque Tecnológico de San Sebastián, 20009 San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, Spain
| |
Collapse
|