Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and wedge resection for the treatment of renal malignancy

Outcomes and Techniques of Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) for Renal Hilar Masses: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Background: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly being employed in the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and it is expanding in the field of complex renal tumors. The aim of this systematic review was to consolidate and assess the results of RAPN when dealing with entirely central hilar masses and to examine the various methods used to address the surgical difficulties associated with them. Methods: A thorough literature search in September 2023 across various databases focused on RAPN for renal hilar masses, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The primary goal was to evaluate RAPN's surgical and functional outcomes, with a secondary aim of examining different surgical techniques. Out of 1250 records, 13 full-text manuscripts were reviewed. Results: Evidence is growing in favor of RAPN for renal hilar masses. Despite a predominance of retrospective studies and a lack of long-term data, RAPN shows positive surgical outcomes and preserves renal function without compromising cancer treatment effectiveness. Innovative suturing and clamping methods are emerging in surgical management. Conclusions: RAPN is a promising technique for managing renal hilar masses in RCC, offering effective surgical outcomes and renal function preservation. The study highlights the need for more long-term data and prospective studies to further validate these findings.

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumors: Report of 32 cases

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility and clinical efficacy of retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumors.

METHODS

Between June 2002 and February 2004, 11 cases of renal benign tumor and 21 cases of renal malignant tumor underwent enucleation of the tumor and wedge resection of the tumor through retroperitoneal laparoscopy, respectively. Tumor resection and hemostasis were mainly achieved by harmonic scalpel. Follow-up studies were performed with an evaluation using renal spiral computed tomography.

RESULTS

All procedures were technically successful. The mean operating time was 70 minutes for enucleation and 96 minutes for wedge resection. The mean estimated blood loss was 35 mL for enucleation and 65.5 mL for wedge resection. The mean hospital stay after surgery was 6.5 days. No intraoperative complications occurred. The pathologic examination confirmed renal cell carcinoma in 21 patients and angiomyolipoma in 11. The pathologic stage was pT1a in the 21 patients with renal cell carcinoma. All resected tumor specimens had negative surgical margins for cancer. No local recurrence or trocar site metastasis was observed during a mean follow-up period of 13 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery represents a feasible option for patients with localized renal tumors. This procedure could offer precise and complete tumor excision while minimizing morbidity, improving cosmesis, and shortening convalescence.

NECESSITY OF URETERAL CATHETER DURING LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is a relatively recently introduced method of treating renal tumors and, as such, surgical technique is evolving. In open series urinary fistula formation represents a common postoperative complication. In the laparoscopic approach investigators have advocated the placement of a ureteral catheter with retrograde dye injection to visualize caliceal entry to aid in closure. In this study we assessed the necessity of ureteral catheter placement during LPN in decreasing urinary leakage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From February 1998 until November 2002 laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was performed in 103 patients with renal tumors. The patients were assessed retrospectively and divided into 2 groups according to placement (group 1) or no placement (group 2) of an external ureteral catheter. Group 1 included 54 patients (mean age +/- SD 57.4 +/- 13.4 years) and group 2 included 49 patients (mean age +/- SD 57.5 +/- 10.9). Intraoperative and postoperative parameters including blood loss, operative time, ischemia time, mass size, complications and hospital stay were reviewed and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the 2 groups in mean estimated blood loss (group 1, 394.7 cc vs group 2, 291.5 cc, p = 0.07), postoperative serum creatinine (group 1, 0.95 mg/dl vs group 2, 0.89 mg/dl, p = 0.12), requirement for pain medication (group 1, 8.9 mg vs group 2, 4.9 mg morphine equivalents, p = 0.12), hospital stay (group 1, 3.1 vs group 2, 2.9, p = 0.29) and warm ischemia time (group 1, 28 minutes vs group 2, 26.5 minutes, p = 0.18). Mean total operative time was significantly longer for group 1 compared to group 2 (191.1 vs 149.4 minutes, respectively, p = 0.001). Postoperative urinary leakage requiring prolonged drainage occurred in 1 patient in group 1 and 1 in group 2. In both cases caliceal entry was identified and sutured.

CONCLUSIONS

With experience caliceal entry can be identified without the need for a ureteral catheter in patients undergoing LPN for a tumor less than 4.5 cm. Urinary fistula may occur despite caliceal entry and repair. A ureteral catheter may not decrease urinary fistula in patients undergoing LPN.

MR techniques for renal imaging

This article describes the principles, attributes, and pitfalls of the many MR imaging approaches available for assessment of renal-related disorders. Tables 1 and 2 summarize the specific approach and rationale.

Initial experience in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor with clamping of renal vessels

PURPOSE

To describe our initial experience with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) with clamping of the renal vessels before tumor excision and suturing of the renal parenchyma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between July 2001 and April 2002, 19 consecutive patients underwent transperitoneal LPN in our institution, 14 for tumors <4 cm with suspicion of renal-cell cancer and 5 for suspicion of angiomyolipoma at CT with one tumor confirmed histopathologically by percutaneous needle biopsy. We divided these patients into the first 10 cases (Group 1) and the last 9 cases (Group 2). One patient had end-stage renal disease but was not on dialysis; the remaining patients had elective partial nephrectomy. Initially, a ureteral catheter was placed. The partial nephrectomy was performed with clamping of the renal vessels, so that the tumor was excised with cold scissors. Intracorporeal cooling of the kidney was achieved by a ureteral catheter connected to a 4 degrees C solution flowing to the renal pelvis during the whole procedure until the clamps were released. Intracorporeal free-hand suturing was exclusively used to close the collecting system (when opened) and to approximate the renal parenchyma.

RESULTS

All procedures were completed laparoscopically. The mean renal warm ischemia time was 28.5+/-7 minutes (range 15-47 minutes). The mean laparoscopic operating time was 125+/-37 minutes (range 90-390 minutes). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 290+/-276 mL (range 25-1200 mL). Two patients required blood transfusion, and four had complications. There was immediate deterioration in renal function (creatinine 1.42+/-0.56 mg/dL), but improvement was seen at 1 month (1.17+/-0.34 mg/dL). There were no statistically significant differences in operative features and outcomes in Groups 1 and 2, but there were improvements in the mean operating time by 30 minutes, the mean intraoperative blood loss by 113 mL without any transfusion, and the mean renal warm ischemia time by 6 minutes. There was only one patient in Group 2 with a complication. The surgical margin was negative for tumor for all patients. Postoperative pathology examination showed renal-cell cancer in 11 patients (pT1), oncocytoma in 3 patients, and angiomyolipoma in 5 patients. The mean tumor grade was 2. The mean tumor size was 25.8+/-11.6 mm with a mean tumor-free margin of 2.6+/-2.4 mm. The median follow-up is 3 months, so oncologic outcome cannot be assessed.

CONCLUSION

The technique of LPN can be standardized and should be proposed for small tumors when they are not invading the hilum. Clamping the renal pedicle allows better vision for more accurate tumor excision with a safety margin and hemostatic suturing of the parenchymal defect, resulting in less blood loss and shorter operative time, parameters that improve with experience.

Laparoscopic partial kidney ablation with high intensity focused ultrasound

PURPOSE

High intensity focused ultrasound has been performed for transrectal and extracorporeal thermal ablation of tissues. We developed and tested a laparoscopic probe that allows real-time ultrasound imaging during partial renal ablation using high intensity focused ultrasound.

METHODS

A Sonablate 200 (Focus Surgery, Indianapolis, Indiana) high intensity focused ultrasound system with a modified 18 mm. laparoscopic probe was used in all experiments. In 13 Yucatan mini-pigs a 5Fr ureteral catheter was inserted into the renal pelvis and 10 cc air were instilled into the collecting system. The kidney was laparoscopically dissected, the high intensity focused ultrasound probe was inserted through a 33 mm. laparoscopic port and the targeted renal pole was treated.

RESULTS

Renal lesions were created in 12 of 13 treated kidneys under real-time ultrasound visualization. Median operative time was 180 minutes, average high intensity focused ultrasound activation time was 18.3 minutes and lesion size was 23 x 17 x 11 mm. At 4 and 14 days 4 (acute group) and 6 (subacute group) animals were available for renal functional and anatomical evaluation, respectively. No difference in renal function was seen in treated and untreated kidneys. Pathological examination at 14 days revealed homogenous and complete tissue necrosis throughout the whole volume of the lesion with sharp demarcation from adjacent normal tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to refine a probe for laparoscopic high intensity focused ultrasound delivery capable of simultaneous ultrasound imaging. Partial renal ablation using this probe is feasible and safe, and resulted in homogenous, complete and reproducible lesions.

Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma

Since the first reported case of laparoscopic nephrectomy by Clayman et al. in 1991, laparoscopy is gaining acceptance as a viable alternative to open surgery for renal cell carcinoma. The benefits of laparoscopy include improved quality of life and lower incidence of perioperative morbidity. The perceived risks of laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma include port-site metastasis, increased operative time, and the concern for inadequate surgical resection. The preliminary data concerning laparoscopy in renal cell carcinoma, however, indicate that rates of tumor recurrence are equivalent to open surgery while resulting in better cosmesis, decreased level of perioperative analgesic use, and decreased length of time to full convalescence.