In VitroActivities of Daptomycin, Linezolid, and Quinupristin-Dalfopristin against a Challenge Panel of Staphylococci and Enterococci, Including Vancomycin-IntermediateStaphylococcus aureusand Vancomycin-ResistantEnterococcus faecium

Meeting the Unmet Need in the Management of MDR Gram-Positive Infections with Oral Bactericidal Agent Levonadifloxacin

Levonadifloxacin (intravenous) and its oral prodrug alalevonadifloxacin are broad-spectrum antibacterial agents developed for the treatment of difficult-to-treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria, especially methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, atypical bacteria, anaerobic bacteria, and biodefence pathogens as well as Gram-negative bacteria. Levonadifloxacin has a well-defined mechanism of action involving a strong affinity for DNA gyrase as well as topoisomerase IV. Alalevonadifloxacin with widely differing solubility and oral bioavailability has pharmacokinetic profile identical to levonadifloxacin. Unlike existing MRSA drugs such as vancomycin and linezolid, which cause unfavorable side effects like nephrotoxicity, bone-marrow toxicity, and muscle toxicity, levonadifloxacin/alalevonadifloxacin has demonstrated superior safety and tolerability features with no serious adverse events. Levonadifloxacin/alalevonadifloxacin could be a useful weapon in the battle against infections caused by resistant microorganisms and could be a preferred antibiotic of choice for empirical therapy in the future.

The global prevalence of Daptomycin, Tigecycline, Quinupristin/Dalfopristin, and Linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci strains: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (MRCoNS) are among the main causes of nosocomial infections, which have caused major problems in recent years due to continuously increasing spread of various antibiotic resistance features. Apparently, vancomycin is still an effective antibiotic for treatment of infections caused by these bacteria but in recent years, additional resistance phenotypes have led to the accelerated introduction of newer agents such as linezolid, tigecycline, daptomycin, and quinupristin/dalfopristin (Q/D). Due to limited data availability on the global rate of resistance to these antibiotics, in the present study, the resistance rates of S. aureus, Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and CoNS to these antibiotics were collected.

Method

Several databases including web of science, EMBASE, and Medline (via PubMed), were searched (September 2018) to identify those studies that address MRSA, and CONS resistance to linezolid, tigecycline, daptomycin, and Q/D around the world.

Result

Most studies that reported resistant staphylococci were from the United States, Canada, and the European continent, while African and Asian countries reported the least resistance to these antibiotics. Our results showed that linezolid had the best inhibitory effect on S. aureus. Although resistances to this antibiotic have been reported from different countries, however, due to the high volume of the samples and the low number of resistance, in terms of statistical analyzes, the resistance to this antibiotic is zero. Moreover, linezolid, daptomycin and tigecycline effectively (99.9%) inhibit MRSA. Studies have shown that CoNS with 0.3% show the lowest resistance to linezolid and daptomycin, while analyzes introduced tigecycline with 1.6% resistance as the least effective antibiotic for these bacteria. Finally, MRSA and CoNS had a greater resistance to Q/D with 0.7 and 0.6%, respectively and due to its significant side effects and drug-drug interactions; it appears that its use is subject to limitations.

Conclusion

The present study shows that resistance to new agents is low in staphylococci and these antibiotics can still be used for treatment of staphylococcal infections in the world.

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Diabetic Foot Infection in India: A Growing Menace

Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a serious and common complication of diabetes mellitus. These infections are potentially disastrous and rapidly progress to deeper spaces and tissues. If not treated promptly and appropriately, DFI can be incurable or even lead to septic gangrene, which may require foot amputation. Mostly, these infections are polymicrobial, where Gram-positive pathogens mainly Staphylococcus aureus play a dominant causative role. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is present in 10% to 32% of diabetic infections and is associated with a higher rate of treatment failure, morbidity, and hospitalization cost in patients with DFIs. The increasing resistance of bacteria and the adverse effects pertaining to the safety and tolerability towards currently available anti-MRSA agents have limited the available treatment options for patients with DFI. Infection control, antimicrobial stewardship, and rapid diagnostics based on the microbiological culture and the antimicrobial susceptibility testing results are important components in helping curb this disturbing trend. Emphasis to revisit a vigorous research effort in order to improve the therapeutic options for the increasingly resistant and highly adaptable MRSA is the need of hour. Through this review article, we have made an attempt to explore the ongoing therapeutic trends in the management of DFI and highlighted the challenges in treatment of DFI. We have also given a brief overview of a few novel drugs that are under development to treat MRSA infections.

Dalbavancin is active in vitro against biofilms formed by dalbavancin-susceptible enterococci

We tested the in vitro activity of dalbavancin, vancomycin and daptomycin against 83 enterococcal isolates in planktonic and biofilm states. The MIC₉₀ for vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis was 0.125 and 4μg/mL for dalbavancin and daptomycin, respectively. For vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, the MIC₉₀ was >16 and 2μg/mL for dalbavancin and daptomycin, respectively. Dalbavancin minimum biofilm inhibitory concentrations (MBICs) for vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant isolates were ≤0.25 and >16μg/mL, respectively. The daptomycin MBIC₉₀ for all isolates was 4μg/mL. For E. faecalis and E. faecium, dalbavancin minimum biofilm bactericidal concentrations (MBBCs) for vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant isolates were ≤4 and >16μg/mL, respectively, whereas vancomycin MBBCs were >128μg/mL for all isolates, and daptomycin MBBC₉₀ values for both species were 128μg/mL. In summary, dalbavancin exhibited in vitro activity against all tested isolates of vancomycin-susceptible, but not against vancomycin-resistant enterococci; activity was observed in both the planktonic and biofilm states.

Combination Therapy With Vancomycin and Ceftaroline for Refractory Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Case Series

PURPOSE

Although vancomycin has been the mainstay of therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, its effectiveness has been challenged. Combination therapy may be used for patients with persistent MRSA bacteremia refractory to initial therapy. Studies have reported in vitro synergy between vancomycin and ceftaroline; however, clinical experience with this therapy is limited. Here, we report our experience with 5 cases of vancomycin-refractory MRSA bacteremia treated with the combination of vancomycin and ceftaroline.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and August 2016, 5 patients were identified who received vancomycin and ceftaroline combination therapy due to persistent bacteremia or deterioration of their clinical status on vancomycin alone (despite a vancomycin MIC within the susceptible range).

FINDINGS

Five patients presented with MRSA bacteremia secondary to endocarditis (n = 2), epidural abscess (n = 2), or left iliopsoas abscess (n = 1). Four of the 5 patients experienced microbiologic cure, and 1 patient transitioned to palliative care.

IMPLICATIONS

This case series serves to describe additional clinical experience with vancomycin and ceftaroline combination therapy. This combination may be considered when vancomycin monotherapy does not lead to microbiological and/or clinical improvement in patients with metastatic MRSA bacteremia. Additional studies are warranted to further define its role in salvage therapy for persistent MRSA bacteremia.

Newer antibiotics for the treatment of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis

Peritonitis is a debilitating infectious complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Drug-resistant bacterial peritonitis typically has a lower response rate to antibiotics. In the past 15 years, newer antibiotics with activities against drug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria have been developed. In most circumstances, peritonitis due to methicillin-resistant staphylococci responds to vancomycin. If vancomycin cannot be used due to allergy and/or non-susceptibility, there is increasing evidence that linezolid and daptomycin are the drugs of choice. It is reasonable to start linezolid orally or intravenously, but subsequent dose reduction may be necessary in case of myelosuppression. Daptomycin can be given intravenously or intraperitoneally and has excellent anti-biofilm activity. Other treatment options for drug-resistant Gram-positive bacterial peritonitis include teicoplanin, tigecycline and quinupristin/dalfopristin. Teicoplanin is not available in some countries (e.g. the USA). Tigecycline can only be given intravenously. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is ineffective against Enterococcus faecalis and there is only low-quality evidence to support its efficacy in the treatment of peritonitis. Effective newer antibiotics against drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are lacking. Polymyxins can be considered, but evidence on its efficacy is limited. In this review, we will discuss the potential use of newer antibiotics in the treatment of drug-resistant bacterial peritonitis in PD patients.

In-vitro antimicrobial activity of marine actinobacteria against multidrug resistance Staphylococcus aureus

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the antibacterial activity of marine actinobacteria against multidrug resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MDRSA).

METHODS

Fifty one actinobacterial strains were isolated from salt pans soil, costal area in Kothapattanam, Ongole, Andhra Pradesh. Primary screening was done using cross-streak method against MDRSA. The bioactive compounds are extracted from efficient actinobacteria using solvent extraction. The antimicrobial activity of crude and solvent extracts was performed using Kirby-Bauer method. MIC for ethyl acetate extract was determined by modified agar well diffusion method. The potent actinobacteria are identified using Nonomura key, Shirling and Gottlieb 1966 with Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology.

RESULTS

Among the fifty one isolates screened for antibacterial activity, SRB25 were found efficient against MDRSA. The ethyl acetate extracts showed high inhibition against test organism. MIC test was performed with the ethyl acetate extract against MDRSA and found to be 1 000 µg/mL. The isolated actinobacteria are identified as Streptomyces sp with the help of Nonomura key.

CONCLUSIONS

The current investigation reveals that the marine actinobacteria from salt pan environment can be able to produce new drug molecules against drug resistant microorganisms.

A current perspective on daptomycin for the clinical microbiologist

Daptomycin is a lipopeptide antimicrobial with in vitro bactericidal activity against Gram-positive bacteria that was first approved for clinical use in 2004 in the United States. Since this time, significant data have emerged regarding the use of daptomycin for the treatment of serious infections, such as bacteremia and endocarditis, caused by Gram-positive pathogens. However, there are also increasing reports of daptomycin nonsusceptibility, in Staphylococcus aureus and, in particular, Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis. Such nonsusceptibility is largely in the context of prolonged treatment courses and infections with high bacterial burdens, but it may occur in the absence of prior daptomycin exposure. Nonsusceptibility in both S. aureus and Enterococcus is mediated by adaptations to cell wall homeostasis and membrane phospholipid metabolism. This review summarizes the data on daptomycin, including daptomycin's unique mode of action and spectrum of activity and mechanisms for nonsusceptibility in key pathogens, including S. aureus, E. faecium, and E. faecalis. The challenges faced by the clinical laboratory in obtaining accurate susceptibility results and reporting daptomycin MICs are also discussed.

In vitro activity of daptomycin against Enterococcus faecalis under various conditions of growth-phases, inoculum and pH

Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) has become a major leading cause of nosocomial endocarditis. Treatment of such infections remains problematic and new therapeutic options are needed. Nine E. faecalis strains were tested: six obtained from patients presenting endocarditis, one with isolated bacteremia, and two reference strains. Antibiotics included daptomycin, alone or in combination, linezolid, tigecycline, rifampicin, gentamicin, teicoplanin, ceftriaxone and amoxicillin. Time-kill studies included colony counts at 1, 4 and 24 h of incubation. Significant bactericidal activity was defined as a decrease of ≥3log₁₀CFU/ml after 24 h of incubation. Antibiotics were tested at a low (10⁶ CFU/ml) and high (10⁹ CFU/ml) inoculum, against exponential- and stationary-phase bacteria. We also performed time kill studies of chemically growth arrested E. faecalis. Various pH conditions were used during the tests. In exponential growth phase and with a low inoculum, daptomycin alone at 60 µg/ml and the combination amoxicillin-gentamicin both achieved a 4-log₁₀ reduction in one hour on all strains. In exponential growth phase with a high inoculum, daptomycin alone was bactericidal at a concentration of 120 µg/ml. All the combinations tested with this drug were indifferent. In stationary phase with a high inoculum daptomycin remained bactericidal but exhibited a pH dependent activity and slower kill rates. All combinations that did not include daptomycin were not bactericidal in conditions of high inoculum, whatever the growth phase. The results indicate that daptomycin is the only antibiotic that may be able of overcoming the effects of growth phase and high inoculum.

Amycolamicin: a novel broad-spectrum antibiotic inhibiting bacterial topoisomerase

The abuse of antibacterial drugs imposes a selection pressure on bacteria that has driven the evolution of multidrug resistance in many pathogens. Our efforts to discover novel classes of antibiotics to combat these pathogens resulted in the discovery of amycolamicin (AMM). The absolute structure of AMM was determined by NMR spectroscopy, X-ray analysis, chemical degradation, and modification of its functional groups. AMM consists of trans-decalin, tetramic acid, two unusual sugars (amycolose and amykitanose), and dichloropyrrole carboxylic acid. The pyranose ring named as amykitanose undergoes anomerization in methanol. AMM is a potent and broad-spectrum antibiotic against Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria by inhibiting DNA gyrase and bacterial topoisomerase IV. The target of AMM has been proved to be the DNA gyrase B subunit and its binding mode to DNA gyrase is different from those of novobiocin and coumermycin, the known DNA gyrase inhibitors.

Clinical update on linezolid in the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections

Gram-positive pathogens are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in both community and health care settings. Glycopeptides have traditionally been the antibiotics of choice for multiresistant Gram-positive pathogens but there are problems with their use, including the emergence of glycopeptide-resistant strains, tissue penetration, and achieving and monitoring adequate serum levels. Newer antibiotics such as linezolid, a synthetic oxazolidinone, are available for the treatment of resistant Gram-positive bacteria. Linezolid is active against a wide range of Gram-positive bacteria and has been generally available for the treatment of Gram-positive infections since 2000. There are potential problems with linezolid use, including its bacteriostatic action and the relatively high incidence of reported adverse effects, particularly with long-term use. Long-term use may also be complicated by the development of resistance. However, linezolid has been shown to be clinically useful in the treatment of several serious infections where traditionally bacteriocidal agents have been required and many of its adverse effects are reversible on cessation. It has also been shown to be a cost-effective treatment option in several studies, with its high oral bioavailability allowing an early change from intravenous to oral formulations with consequent earlier patient discharge and lower inpatient costs.

Relationships between vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration, dosing strategies, and outcomes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

Retrospective study aimed to examine outcomes of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia in relationship to vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (VAN MIC) and serum trough concentrations among subjects who had ≥1 blood culture positive for MRSA between April 2008 and August 2009. Treatment failure occurred in 7/24 (29%) subjects with VAN MIC = 2 mg/L versus 20/94 (21%) subjects with VAN MIC ≤1.5 mg/L (adjusted OR 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-5.14). Among subjects who had documented VAN serum trough concentrations, treatment failure occurred in 5/26 (19%) subjects with concentrations <15 mg/L versus 18/68 (27%) subjects with concentrations ≥15 mg/L (adjusted OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.21-3.84). In conclusion, treatment outcomes were similar regardless of VAN MIC, although there was a non-statistically significant trend towards decreased clinical efficacy among patients with VAN MIC = 2 mg/L. Optimization of VAN pharmacokinetic indices did not appear to correlate with clinical responses.

A review of daptomycin for injection (Cubicin) in the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections

Daptomycin is a novel bactericidal antibiotic with excellent activity against gram-positive organisms. It is a large cyclic lipopeptide with a unique mechanism of action. Daptomycin is given once a day and is renally cleared, requiring dose adjustment in patients with impaired renal function. Unfortunately, there have been case reports of resistant gram-positive organisms. Daptomycin is generally well tolerated, though myopathy has been reported. 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors should be stopped in patients on daptomycin. Daptomycin shows promise in experimental models of endocarditis, meningitis, ventriculitis, and peritonitis, and is currently approved for use in skin and soft-tissue infections. Daptomycin is a welcome newcomer to the gram-positive antimicrobial arsenal.

Antibiotics for gram-positive bacterial infection: vancomycin, teicoplanin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, oxazolidinones, daptomycin, telavancin, and ceftaroline

An overview of the mechanism of action, dosing, clinical indications, and toxicities of the glycopeptide vancomycin is provided. The emerging gram-positive bacterial resistance to antimicrobials and its mechanisms are reviewed. Strategies to control this emergence of resistance are expected to be proposed. Newer antimicrobial agents that have activity against vancomycin-resistant organisms are now available and play a critical role in the treatment of life-threatening infections.

Differences in daptomycin and vancomycin ex vivo behaviour can lead to false interpretation of negative blood cultures

In clinical studies on bacteraemia, the negativity of blood cultures is an important endpoint for comparing the efficacy of different therapeutic regimens. In FAN anaerobic blood culture medium (BacT/ALERT system), daptomycin displayed increased MIC against Staphylococcus aureus and improved abolishment of its carryover effect in charcoal when compared with vancomycin. Differences between these two drugs can lead to a false interpretation of negative blood cultures. To compare different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of bacteraemia, preliminary studies are mandatory to ensure that ex vivo antibiotic behaviour is similar in the blood-culture system used.

Rising incidence of Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and susceptibility to antibiotics: a global analysis 2004-2009

During 2004-2009, 20004 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus were collected from the Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial (T.E.S.T.). Of these isolates, 8249 (41.2%) were meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 11755 (58.8%) were meticillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). A total of 4.0%, 5.3% and 3.0% of all S. aureus, MRSA and MSSA isolates, respectively, exhibited vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ≥ 2 μg/mL. Whilst no vancomycin-resistant S. aureus were encountered in this study and the majority of these isolates remained susceptible to vancomycin at the Clinical and Laboratory Standards (CLSI) breakpoint of 2 μg/mL, the total number of isolates with MICs creeping up to 2 μg/mL and above increased in all S. aureus from 4.0% in 2004 to 7.7% in 2009 (P < 0.001). Moreover, in MRSA this phenotype increased from 5.6% in 2004 to 11.1% in 2009 (P < 0.001). The increase was also notable for MSSA, which rose from 2.6% in 2004 to 5.6% in 2009 (P < 0.001). Of the 12 antibiotics tested, linezolid, minocycline, tigecycline and vancomycin were the most active agents by susceptibility against all S. aureus, all MRSA and all MSSA isolates. Against MRSA isolates with vancomycin MICs ≥ 2 μg/mL, susceptibility to vancomycin decreased from 100% in 2004 to 95.77% in 2009 (P > 0.05). Similarly, in MSSA isolates susceptibility to vancomycin decreased from 100% in 2004 to 91.07% in 2009 (P > 0.05). These data suggest that although the number of isolates of S. aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin has increased significantly from 2004 to 2009, this upward creep of MICs has not yet impacted significantly on the overall susceptibility of vancomycin against either MRSA or MSSA.

Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus, including vancomycin-intermediate and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate strains: resistance mechanisms, laboratory detection, and clinical implications

The emergence of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) over the past decade has provided a challenge to diagnostic microbiologists to detect these strains, clinicians treating patients with infections due to these strains, and researchers attempting to understand the resistance mechanisms. Recent data show that these strains have been detected globally and in many cases are associated with glycopeptide treatment failure; however, more rigorous clinical studies are required to clearly define the contribution of hVISA to glycopeptide treatment outcomes. It is now becoming clear that sequential point mutations in key global regulatory genes contribute to the hVISA and VISA phenotypes, which are associated predominately with cell wall thickening and restricted vancomycin access to its site of activity in the division septum; however, the phenotypic features of these strains can vary because the mutations leading to resistance can vary. Interestingly, changes in the staphylococcal surface and expression of agr are likely to impact host-pathogen interactions in hVISA and VISA infections. Given the subtleties of vancomycin susceptibility testing against S. aureus, it is imperative that diagnostic laboratories use well-standardized methods and have a framework for detecting reduced vancomycin susceptibility in S. aureus.

Limitations of antibiotic options for invasive infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: is combination therapy the answer?

Invasive infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), particularly those involving persistent bacteraemia, necrotizing pneumonia, osteomyelitis and other deep-seated sites of infections, are associated with high mortality and are often difficult to treat. The response to treatment of severe MRSA infection with currently available antibiotics active against MRSA is often unsatisfactory, leading some physicians to resort to combination antibiotic therapy. Now, with the emergence of community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) clones that display enhanced virulence potentially related to up-regulated toxin production, the use of adjuvant protein synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics to reduce toxin production also has been advocated by some experts. In this review, we discuss the limitations of antibiotics currently available for the treatment of serious invasive MRSA infections and review the existing literature that examines the potential role of combination therapy in these infections.

Antibiotics for gram-positive bacterial infections: vancomycin, teicoplanin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, oxazolidinones, daptomycin, dalbavancin, and telavancin

An overview of the mechanism of action, dosing, clinical indications, and toxicities of the glycopeptide vancomycin is provided. The emerging gram-positive bacterial resistance to antimicrobials and its mechanisms are reviewed. Strategies to control this emergence of resistance are expected to be proposed. Newer antimicrobial agents that have activity against vancomycin-resistant organisms are now available and play a critical role in the treatment of life-threatening infections.

Infective endocarditis caused by daptomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis: A case report

Daptomycin is a first-in-class antibiotic with efficacy against Gram-positive bacteria. We document the second report of daptomycin resistance in a clinical isolate of Enterococcus faecalis.

Characterisation of a Staphylococcus aureus strain with progressive loss of susceptibility to vancomycin and daptomycin during therapy

Following an initial response to vancomycin therapy, a patient with meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia developed endocarditis, failed a second course of vancomycin and then failed daptomycin therapy. An increase in the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations of four consecutive MRSA blood isolates from 2 microg/mL to 8 microg/mL was shown by Etest. Population analysis of four successive blood culture isolates recovered over the 10-week period showed that the MRSA strain became progressively less susceptible to both vancomycin and daptomycin. Retrospectively, the macro Etest method using teicoplanin indicated a decrease in vancomycin susceptibility in the second blood isolate. The patient improved after treatment with various courses of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, quinupristin/dalfopristin and linezolid. Early detection of vancomycin-heteroresistant S. aureus isolates, which appeared to have clinical significance in this case, continues to be a challenge for the clinical laboratory. Development of suitable practical methods for this should be given priority. Concurrent development of resistance to vancomycin and daptomycin, whilst rare, must be considered in a patient who is unresponsive to daptomycin following vancomycin therapy.

Pre-clinical experience with daptomycin

Daptomycin is a broad-spectrum, bactericidal agent active against Gram-positive bacteria, acting largely and unusually through membrane depolarization. Activity is markedly affected in vitro by the availability of calcium ions, and its high molecular weight with associated poor diffusion means that conventional disc diffusion testing is not reliable (and as a consequence not available). In order to allow susceptibility categorization, it is recommended that the MIC be determined in the presence of a defined calcium concentration. The activity of daptomycin is concentration-dependent with a prolonged post-antibiotic effect. It has linear pharmacokinetics, with a half-life of 8-9 h, the primary route of excretion is renal, it exhibits serum protein binding of approximately 92% and there is no interaction with the P450 cytochrome. Daptomycin is inactivated by surfactant in the lung and, in consequence, is not recommended for the treatment of respiratory infections. Daptomycin is currently licensed for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections and for bacteraemia and right-sided endocarditis due to methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus. To date, daptomycin-resistant bacteria have rarely been isolated from patients, although increases in vancomycin MIC may be linked to reduced susceptibility to daptomycin. Close monitoring of resistance is essential to maintain the clinical utility of the drug. Using once-daily dosing, daptomycin has been generally well tolerated; however, weekly monitoring of creatinine phosphokinase is recommended, as myopathy in skeletal muscles has been seen, albeit rarely. The rapid bactericidal action of daptomycin makes it a useful addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for the treatment of Gram-positive infections, providing a valuable alternative to vancomycin when it is inappropriate or resistance is a problem.

In vitro activity of daptomycin against Gram-positive cocci: the first multicentre study in Greece

A total of 10420 Gram-positive cocci (including staphylococci, enterococci and various groups of streptococci) collected from clinically significant specimens in ten Greek hospitals during 2006--2007 were tested for their susceptibility to daptomycin. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by the broth microdilution method. Daptomycin demonstrated very high activity against Enterococcus faecalis (MIC at which 50% of the isolates were inhibited (MIC50) = 1mg/L and MIC at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited (MIC90) = 1.36 mg/L), Enterococcus faecium (MIC50 = 1.36 mg/L and MIC90 = 1.90 mg/L), Streptococcus pyogenes (MIC50 = 0.12 mg/L and MIC90 = 0.50mg/L), Streptococcus agalactiae (MIC50 = 0.09 mg/L and MIC90 = 0.12 mg/L), Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC50 = 0.24 mg/L and MIC90 = 0.5 mg/L) and viridans group streptococci (MIC50 = 0.50 mg/L and MIC90 = 0.89 mg/L). Resistance to linezolid and vancomycin for enterococci and to penicillin for streptococci appears to be independent of reduced susceptibility to daptomycin. On the other hand, daptomycin was also active against meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MIC50 = 0.44 mg/L and MIC90 = 0.78 mg/L) and meticillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MIC50 = 0.24 mg/L and MIC90 = 0.44 mg/L); however, 0.9% of the staphylococci tested had an MIC > 1mg/L, which is the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoint proposed for susceptibility. For all tested organism groups, resistance to daptomycin was not associated with glycopeptide resistance.

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection With Intermediate Sensitivity to Vancomycin: A Case Report and Literature Review

Staphylococcus aureus is a major cause of bacteremia and endocarditis in adults. Vancomycin is the standard therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. Although clinical failure associated with the development of reduced susceptibility to vancomycin during the course of treatment for MRSA bacteremia has been reported infrequently, such an occurrence is very serious. We report a case of 43-year-old woman with of MRSA bacteremia, who relapsed after initial, apparently successful vancomycin treatment and developed left-sided endocarditis and vertebral osteomyelitis. Two weeks into her second admission, the vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration rose from ≤ 2 µg/mL (susceptible) to 4 µg/mL (intermediate). The antibiotic was changed to daptomycin. Subsequent blood cultures were negative and sepsis resolved.

Evaluation of endocarditis caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus developing nonsusceptibility to daptomycin

We examined sequential methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates from a patient with mitral valve endocarditis recovered during persistent bacteremia on standard therapy and relapse after treatment with daptomycin. An isolate obtained after 5 days of antimicrobial therapy, but before exposure to daptomycin, showed subtle physiological changes in response to daptomycin, with significant regrowth in the daptomycin killing assay compared to the treatment-naive strain. Once daptomycin was started, the population became more heterogeneous and tested as nonsusceptible. These organisms were examined in a simulated-vegetation in vitro pharmacodynamic model, which confirmed progressive decreases in killing with daptomycin concentrations that simulate those attained in humans with 6-mg/kg of body weight daily dosing. Early surgical intervention or combination therapy or both might have prevented the loss of daptomycin susceptibility.

Accuracy of six antimicrobial susceptibility methods for testing linezolid against staphylococci and enterococci

A challenge panel of enterococci (n = 50) and staphylococci (n = 50), including 17 and 15 isolates that were nonsusceptible to linezolid, respectively, were tested with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution and disk diffusion reference methods. In addition, all 100 isolates were tested in parallel by Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden), MicroScan WalkAway (Dade, West Sacramento, CA), BD Phoenix (BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, MD), VITEK (bioMérieux, Durham, NC), and VITEK 2 (bioMérieux) by using the manufacturers' protocols. Compared to the results of the broth microdilution method for detecting linezolid-nonsusceptible staphylococci and enterococci, MicroScan results showed the highest category agreement (96.0%). The overall categorical agreement levels for VITEK 2, Etest, Phoenix, disk diffusion, and VITEK were 93.0%, 90.0%, 89.6%, 88.0%, and 85.9%, respectively. The essential agreement levels (results within +/-1 doubling dilution of the MIC determined by the reference method) for MicroScan, Phoenix, VITEK 2, Etest, and VITEK were 99.0%, 95.8%, 92.0%, 92.0%, and 85.9%, respectively. The very major error rates for staphylococci were the highest for VITEK (35.7%), Etest (40.0%), and disk diffusion (53.3%), although the total number of resistant isolates tested was small. The very major error rate for enterococci with VITEK was 20.0%. Three systems (MicroScan, VITEK, and VITEK 2) provided no interpretations of nonsusceptible results for staphylococci. These data, from a challenge panel of isolates, illustrate that the recent emergence of linezolid-nonsusceptible staphylococci and enterococci is providing a challenge for many susceptibility testing systems.

Daptomycin antimicrobial activity tested against methicillin-resistant staphylococci and vancomycin-resistant enterococci isolated in European medical centers (2005)

BACKGROUND

Daptomycin is a cyclic lipopeptide with potent activity and broad spectrum against Gram-positive bacteria currently used for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections and bacteremia, including right sided endocarditis. We evaluated the in vitro activity of this compound and selected comparator agents tested against clinical strains of staphylococci and enterococci collected in European medical centers in 2005.

METHODS

A total of 4,640 strains from 23 medical centers located in 10 European countries, Turkey and Israel (SENTRY Program platform) were tested for susceptibility by reference broth microdilution methods according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines and interpretative criteria. Mueller-Hinton broth was supplemented to 50 mg/L Ca++ for testing daptomycin. Results for oxacillin (methicillin)-resistant staphylococci and vancomycin-resistant enterococci were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

Oxacillin resistance rates among Staphylococcus aureus varied from 2.1% in Sweden to 42.5% in the United Kingdom (UK) and 54.7% in Ireland (29.1% overall), while vancomycin resistance rates varied from 0.0% in France, Sweden and Switzerland to 66.7% in the UK and 71.4% in Ireland among Enterococcus faecium (17.9% overall). All S. aureus strains were inhibited at daptomycin MIC of 1 mg/L (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5 mg/L; 100.0% susceptible) and only one coagulase-negative staphylococci strain (0.1%) showed an elevated (>1 mg/L) daptomycin MIC value (4 mg/L). Among E. faecalis (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 mg/L; 100% susceptible) the highest daptomycin MIC value was 2 mg/L; while among E. faecium (MIC50/90, 2/4 mg/L; 100% susceptible) the highest MIC result was 4 mg/L.

CONCLUSION

Daptomycin showed excellent in vitro activity against staphylococci and enterococci collected in European medical centers in 2005 and resistance to oxacillin, vancomycin or quinupristin/dalfopristin did not compromise its activity overall against these pathogens. Based on these results and those of previous publications, daptomycin appears to be an excellent therapeutic option for serious infections caused by oxacillin-resistant staphylococci and vancomycin-resistant enterococci in Europe.

Evaluation of the in vitro activity of daptomycin against 19615 clinical isolates of Gram-positive cocci collected in North American hospitals (2002-2005)

We evaluated the antimicrobial activity of daptomycin against 19,615 clinical strains consecutively collected by numerous centers located across the United States and Canada (2002-2005). Daptomycin was very active against all indicated species (>99% susceptible), with the highest MIC results being 2, 8, 0.5, and 1 microg/mL for staphylococci, enterococci, beta-hemolytic streptococci, and viridans group streptococci, respectively, and no significant loss in potency was observed over the period studied.

Anti-MRSA agents: under investigation, in the exploratory phase and clinically available

Staphylococcal infections are difficult to treat due to the rapid emergence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci and, unfortunately, vancomycin-intermediate or -resistant staphylococci. Numerous alternative treatments are urgently required. In this special report, intensive research of new molecules is highlighted--in known antibacterial families and new medicinal chemical entities.

Multicenter evaluation of the Etest and disk diffusion methods for differentiating daptomycin-susceptible from non-daptomycin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates

Daptomycin is a novel cyclic lipopeptide that is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections associated with Staphylococcus aureus and other gram-positive pathogens and also staphylococcal bacteremia, including right-sided endocarditis. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) established "susceptible-only" interpretive criteria for broth microdilution (BMD) and disk diffusion (DD) testing of daptomycin in 2005. However, a series of S. aureus isolates have been recovered with daptomycin MICs in the nonsusceptible range (i.e., MICs of >1 microg/ml). The objective of this study was to determine the ability of the Etest and DD methods to differentiate daptomycin-susceptible from nonsusceptible isolates of S. aureus compared to the results of the CLSI BMD reference method. There was a good correlation between Etest MIC results and the results of BMD among laboratories (r = 0.86 to 0.88), with 95.3% of the Etest MICs within a +/-1 log(2) dilution of the BMD MIC result. A total of 92 of 102 (90.2%) non-daptomycin-susceptible isolates of S. aureus identified by BMD in two participating laboratories were also classified as nonsusceptible by Etest. However, the very major and major error rates reported by one of the participating laboratories were 13.5 and 4.0%, respectively, primarily due to the absence of an intermediate category. The DD method, however, did not reliably differentiate daptomycin-susceptible from non-daptomycin-susceptible isolates. In 2005, daptomycin disks were voluntarily removed from the market by Cubist Pharmaceuticals. The disk diffusion breakpoints were subsequently removed from the CLSI M100 standard in 2006.

Daptomycin in the treatment of skin, soft-tissue and invasive infections due to Gram-positive bacteria

Daptomycin is a lipopeptide antibiotic that exhibits bactericidal activity against a range of Gram-positive bacterial pathogens including strains resistant to other antibiotics, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Daptomycin is licensed both in the USA and Europe for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections and in the USA this has recently been expanded to include bacteremia and right-sided endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus. A marketing authorization application for this indication is currently under consideration by the European Medicines Agency. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of daptomycin allow for once-daily dosing, although it is recommended that the dosing interval be increased to 2 days in patients with renal impairment. Clinical data generally indicate that daptomycin is well tolerated, but nonetheless concerns persist regarding potential muscle toxicity. Emergence of resistance to daptomycin has been reported, highlighting the need for prospective surveillance to determine the extent of this potential problem.

Assessment of two commercial susceptibility test methods for determination of daptomycin MICs

Daptomycin is a lipopeptide antibiotic with activity against several important gram-positive bacterial pathogens, including drug-resistant staphylococci and enterococci. Because the mechanism of action of daptomycin is calcium-dependent depolarization of the cell membrane, susceptibility testing requires medium supplemented with a physiological level of calcium. This study assessed two Food and Drug Administration-cleared commercial test devices for determination of daptomycin MICs, Etest and JustOne. A collection of 220 selected isolates, including Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Enterococcus faecalis, E. faecium, E. avium, E. durans, E. casseliflavus, and E. gallinarum, were tested by both methods. Included in the collection were 22 S. aureus and 14 Enterococcus sp. isolates that were recovered from patients and were nonsusceptible on the basis of the daptomycin MICs. As the reference method for comparison, all isolates were tested by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method incorporating cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth with 50 microg/ml calcium. Daptomycin MICs agreed, within 1 twofold dilution, for 97% of the isolates by Etest and for 100% by JustOne. However, daptomycin MICs determined by Etest were 1 dilution lower than the reference MICs for 65% of the Enterococcus sp. isolates tested. This resulted in 28.5% very major (VM) errors (4/14) with enterococci (all E. faecium) but none (0/22) with staphylococci. Use of JustOne yielded MICs that were 1 dilution lower than the reference MICs for 69% of the staphylococci and 25% of the enterococci. This resulted in 13.6% VM errors (3/22) with staphylococci and 14.3% VM errors (2/14) with enterococci. The manufacturer-recommended JustOne inoculum preparation resulted in mean colony counts of only 5 x 10(4) to 1 x 10(5) CFU/ml in the wells of the strip. Increasing the inoculum to 3 x 10(5) to 4 x 10(5) CFU/ml eliminated two of five VM errors upon retesting. No major interpretive errors occurred with either device. In summary, daptomycin MICs generated by the Etest or JustOne method generally agreed within 1 dilution of the reference daptomycin MICs. However, both devices produced slightly lower MICs that resulted in some VM errors.

Emergence of a clinical daptomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolate during treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and osteomyelitis

The emergence of a clinically daptomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolate occurred during treatment of methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacteremia and probable vertebral osteomyelitis. The breakthrough isolate was indistinguishable from pretreatment daptomycin-susceptible isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Daptomycin nonsusceptibility was confirmed by MIC and time-kill curve analyses.

High rate of resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin in Enterococcus faecium clinical isolates from Korea

We tested the in vitro susceptibilities of 603 enterococcal isolates from eight tertiary-care hospitals in Korea. The quinupristin-dalfopristin resistance rate in Enterococcus faecium was very high (25 isolates, 10.0%). It was suggested that both clonal spread and the sporadic emergence of quinupristin-dalfopristin-resistant isolates may explain the high prevalence of quinupristin-dalfopristin resistance in Korea.

Clinical progression of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus vertebral osteomyelitis associated with reduced susceptibility to daptomycin

Daptomycin, a novel cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic, exhibits rapid bactericidal activity in vitro against most clinically relevant gram-positive organisms, including drug-resistant pathogens. Herein we describe a patient in whom methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to daptomycin was responsible for bacteremia and progressive vertebral osteomyelitis during daptomycin therapy.

Considerations for the Management of Gram-Positive Pathogens in the Intensive Care Unit

Surveillance data demonstrate that the majority of gram-positive bacterial isolates obtained in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting are staphylococci and enterococci. Staphylococci, mainly Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, compose the majority of clinical isolates. Data from 25 North American ICUs reported methicillin-resistant Saureus (MRSA) in more than 50% of the Saureus organisms isolated mainly from a respiratory source. In addition to MRSA, Saureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin has been reported. Enterococci are typically considered opportunistic pathogens, infecting immunocompromised hosts. Resistance of enterococci to vancomycin, along with the newer gram-positive antimicrobials, is an increasing problem. Investigators have demonstrated that nearly 30% of enterococci isolated in the ICU are resistant to vancomycin. The high level of resistance and limited therapeutic options make treating resistant gram-positive organisms such as MRSA and vancomycin-resistant enterococci particularly problematic. While vancomycin has long been considered the gold standard for the treatment of resistant gram-positive infections, newer agents (eg, quinupristin-dalfopristin, linezolid, and daptomycin) offer therapeutic alternatives.

Antimicrobial activity of daptomycin against multidrug-resistant Gram-positive strains collected worldwide

Daptomycin is a cyclic lipopeptide recently released for clinical use in the treatment of serious Gram-positive infections in hospitalized patients. We evaluated the in vitro activity of daptomycin tested against recently isolated multidrug-resistant Gram-positive clinical strains. A total of 386 isolates were selected from a large collection of strains from more than 70 centers located in Europe, North America, and South America. The strains were tested by reference broth microdilution methods in Mueller-Hinton broth with 50 mg/L Ca++ against daptomycin. Daptomycin was the most potent compound tested against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae with MIC50/90 values at < or =0.12 and 0.25 microg/mL, respectively. Daptomycin was also highly active against vancomycin-resistant enterococci and staphylococcal strains with various resistance patterns. Enterococcus faecium showed higher daptomycin MIC values (MIC90, 4 microg/mL) when compared to E. faecalis (MIC90, 1 microg/mL). In summary, resistance to vancomycin, teicoplanin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, or penicillin among the Gram-positive isolates did not adversely influence daptomycin activity. Daptomycin showed a significant potency and spectrum against Gram-positive species, including multidrug-resistant strains, and may represent a reasonable therapeutic option for infections caused by these important pathogens.

Approaches to vancomycin-resistant enterococci

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews recent publications regarding new antimicrobial drugs for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

RECENT FINDINGS

Newer drugs against vancomycin-resistant enterococci are now available or will soon be available. Quinupristin-dalfopristin, a streptogramin, and linezolid, an oxazolidinone, are effective and safe but only bacteriostatic against enterococi. Bacterial isolates resistant to either antibiotic have been described. Daptomycin, a lipopeptide antimicrobial, has good in-vitro bactericidal activity against enterococci, but very limited clinical data exist regarding the treatment of serious enterococcal infection with this compound. Ramoplanin, the first glycolipodepsipeptide antimicrobial in clinical trials, is not systemically absorbed after oral administration, and is being evaluated for the prevention of bloodstream infection in patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Oritavancin and dalbavancin (both glycopeptides) and tigecycline (a monocycline derivative) are being evaluated in phase II and III trials and are not yet commercially available.

SUMMARY

Treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococci continues to be problematical although these new drugs offer some hope. The rational use of antibiotics, strict guidelines for the use of new compounds, and adherence to infection control practices continue to be essential components of the management of vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization and infection.