Clonal analysis of T-cell responses to the HIV-1 envelope proteins in AIDS vaccine recipients

Evaluation of a lipopeptide immunogen as a therapeutic in HIV type 1-seropositive individuals

A 32-amino acid HIV-1 Gag immunogen was assessed for its ability to augment existing virus-specific CTL responses in chronically HIV-1-infected individuals. The immunogen was an HIV-1 synthetic lipopeptide conjugate composed of an N-palmitoyl-S-[2,3-bis(palmitoyloxy)-(2R)-propyl-N-(R)-cysteinyl] group covalently coupled to a synthetic 32-amino acid Gag peptide containing at least 5 CTL epitopes known to be restricted by HLA-A33, -B8, -B27, -B35, and -Bw62. This potential immunotherapeutic was first determined to be safe in six HIV-1-seropositive subjects, with no adverse clinical effects noted during a 182-day period after administration of a dose of 350 microg. The immunogenicity of this lipopeptide conjugate was then assessed in a pilot study in nine HIV-1-seropositive volunteers with peripheral blood CD4+ lymphocyte counts of >500/microl. Three groups of individuals were studied: HLA-selected subjects who received 350 microg of the immunogen on days 0, 28, and 56 (four subjects); HLA-selected subjects who received a placebo according to a similar inoculation schedule (three subjects); and HLA-mismatched subjects who received the experimental immunogen (two subjects). All subjects were monitored for 26 weeks. After treatment, PBLs from two of the four HLA-selected subjects who received the experimental immunogen showed a transient increase in Gag peptide-specific bulk CTL activity. None of the placebo-vaccinated or vaccinated HLA-mismatched subjects showed any change in bulk Gag peptide-specific CTL activity. However, no consistent decrease in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels was noted in any of the subjects. The present study illustrates that this peptide formulation may not be a sufficiently potent immunogen to significantly augment HIV-1-specific CTLs and to decrease virus load in HIV-1-seropositive individuals.

T(h)1 but not T(h)0 cell help is efficient to induce cytotoxic T lymphocytes by immunization with short synthetic peptides

Immunization of BALB/c mice with peptide HVSGHRMAWDMMMNWA, encompassing residues 121-135 from hepatitis C virus E1 protein, induced CD4(+) T(h)1 cells as well as a long-lasting CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response in vivo when the peptide was administered s.c. with or without incomplete Freund's adjuvant. Using truncated peptides from this sequence it was shown that the determinant recognized by cytotoxic T cells was encompassed by residues SGHRMAWDM. Deletion of residues from the N-terminus or the C-terminus of the wild-type peptide abrogated its helper character. When Val122 of the wild peptide was replaced by Ala, the ability to induce a cytotoxic response was lost concomitantly with the loss of the T(h)1 pattern of cytokine production. Interestingly, the Ala-modified peptide, when co-immunized with a peptide encompassing residues 323-329 from ovalbumin (OVA), which is able to induce a T(h)1 response in BALB/c mice, restored the capacity of the modified peptide to induce CTL. However, co-immunization of the Ala-modified peptide with a peptide encompassing residues 106-118 from sperm whale myoglobin, which induces a T(h)0 cytokine profile in BALB/c mice, was much less efficient than the OVA peptide to restore CTL induction. These results demonstrate that CTL induction with a short synthetic peptide requires that this peptide contains domains recognized by T(c) cells as well as by T(h)1 cells. For those peptides that do not contain this type of T(h) domain, competent T cell help can be provided by co-immunization with a distinct peptide that is able to stimulate a T(h)1 response.

Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant HIV type 1 glycoprotein 160 boosted by a V3 synthetic peptide in HIV-negative volunteers

The safety and the immunogenicity of a recombinant hybrid envelope glycoprotein MN/LAI (rgp160) followed by booster injections of a V3 (MN) linear peptide were evaluated in HIV-negative adults at low risk for HIV infection. Volunteers received either rgp160 in alum at 0, 1, and 6 months (group A), rgp160 at 0 and 1 months followed by V3 at 3 and 6 months formulated in alum (group B), or in Freund's incomplete adjuvant (FIA) (group C). Local and systemic reactions were mild to moderate and resolved within the first 72 hr after immunization. No significant biological changes (routine tests and autoantibodies) were observed. One month after the last injection in either group, neutralizing antibodies (NAs) against the HIV-1 MN isolate were detected in 4 of 5 (A), 7 of 10 (B), and 10 of 10 (C) subjects with significantly higher geometric mean titers in the latter group. Four of nine sera with the highest NA titers against MN weakly cross-neutralized the HIV-1 SF2 isolate; none had NA against the HIV-1 LAI strain or against a North American primary isolate. Specific lymphocyte T cell proliferation to rgp160 was detected in 92% of the subjects after the second injection of rgp160 and in 80% of them 12 months after the first injection. A weak and short-lived envelope-specific CD(4+)-mediated cytotoxic lymphocyte activity was detected at certain time points in few subjects. This prime-boost vaccine approach using rgp160 followed by a V3 peptide was safe in humans, and was able to elicit high levels of neutralizing antibodies and a strong and persistent T cell lymphoproliferative response to rgp160 and to V3. However, the neutralization response was restricted to the homologous HIV-1 strain and little env-specific cytotoxic activity was induced.

HIV-infected macrophages as efficient stimulator cells for detection of cytotoxic T cell responses to HIV in seronegative and seropositive vaccine recipients

The induction of CD8+ CTL responses is a goal of most HIV-1 vaccine trials, but such potentially protective effector responses have been difficult to evaluate, particularly in these vaccine prevention trials, due to technical obstacles. We report a method to evaluate CTL responses based on the ability to infect autologous macrophages with a monocytotropic strain of HIV-1, and to use these cells as efficient stimulators. This approach does not require the addition of exogenous cytokines, allows detection of class I-restricted CTLs against multiple HIV-1 gene products, and circumvents the problem, often detected using other stimulator cells, of high levels of lytic activity against target cells expressing vaccinia and/or EBV antigens. Adherent monocyte-derived macrophages were infected with HIV-1 Ba-L, and used within 2-3 weeks as autologous stimulators. Fresh PBMCs were cultured with the infected macrophages, harvested after 1 week, replated with fresh infected macrophages and filler cells, and tested after 5-7 days for cytolytic activity. CD8+ CTL responses specific for HIV-1 envelope were detected at an E:T ratio as low as 5:1 in two of four HIV-1-uninfected recipients of an HIV vaccine regimen that included a recombinant live vaccinia virus. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity could be detected > 1 year following vaccination. Similar lytic activity was detected with cryopreserved responder cells. In two HIV-1-infected individuals participating in a blinded therapeutic vaccination trial, the use of infected macrophages as in vitro stimulators permitted detection of the presence of envelope and gag-specific CTLs. No responses were observed in nonimmunized, uninfected controls. Thus, HIV-1-infected macrophages can stimulate in vitro the repertoire of primed HIV-reactive CD8+ precursors from seronegative and seropositive participants in HIV-1 vaccine trials, and should facilitate the identification of potentially effective candidate HIV vaccines.

Induction of humoral and cell-mediated anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) responses in HIV sero-negative volunteers by immunization with recombinant gp160

Development of an effective vaccine for prevention of infection with HIV would provide an important mechanism for controlling the AIDS epidemic. In the current study, the first clinical trial of a candidate HIV-1 vaccine initiated in the United States, the safety and immunogenicity of escalating doses (10-1,280 micrograms) of recombinant gp160 (rgp160), were evaluated in 138 HIV-negative volunteers. Maximal antibody responses, as evaluated by ELISA, were seen after immunization with three doses of 1,280 micrograms rgp160. Responses to some specific epitopes of HIV gp160, including the second conserved domain and the CD4 binding site, were seen more frequently than after natural infection. Neutralizing antibodies to the homologous HIV strain, but not heterologous strains, were induced by this regimen. Blastogenic responses to rgp160 were seen in most volunteers receiving at least two doses of > or = 20 micrograms. These envelope-specific T cell responses were also seen against heterologous strains of HIV. No major adverse reactions were seen after immunization. Thus, rgp160 is a safe and immunogenic candidate HIV vaccine; further studies are needed to determine if it will provide any clinical benefit in preventing HIV infection.