Megestrol acetate: promises and pitfalls

Enhanced antitumor activity of combined megestrol acetate and arsenic trioxide treatment in liver cancer cells

Liver cancer is an aggressive malignancy with a very high fatality rate. Although megestrol acetate (MA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) have shown an antitumor effect in liver cancer cells, the therapeutic benefits of MA or ATO alone in patients with liver cancer were limited. The aim of the present study was to elucidate whether the co-treatment of MA/ATO could enhance antitumor efficacy in liver cancer cell lines (Hep G2 and BEL 7402) and explore the underlying anti-cancer mechanisms. The cell viability, apoptotic response and expression levels of associated proteins were detected by Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, flow cytometry and western blotting, respectively. An xenograft model in nude mice bearing a Hep G2 tumor was used to estimate tumor growth in vivo. Co-treatment with MA/ATO markedly improved the inhibition of cell viability, enhanced apoptosis, and increased the phosphorylation of p38, c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1/2 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 on liver cancer cell lines. Furthermore, the tumor growth in the murine Hep G2 cancer xenograft model was significantly inhibited by combined treatment with MA/ATO. The results indicated that MA/ATO combined treatment enhanced antitumor efficacy and possessed potential application for treating liver cancer.

Megestrol acetate for treatment of anorexia-cachexia syndrome

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of a previously published review in The Cochrane Library (2005, Issue 2) on 'Megestrol acetate for the treatment of anorexia-cachexia syndrome'. Megestrol acetate (MA) is currently used to improve appetite and to increase weight in cancer-associated anorexia. In 1993, MA was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of anorexia, cachexia or unexplained weight loss in patients with AIDS. The mechanism by which MA increases appetite is unknown and its effectiveness for anorexia and cachexia in neoplastic and AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) patients is under investigation.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of MA in palliating anorexia-cachexia syndrome in patients with cancer, AIDS and other underlying pathologies.

SEARCH METHODS

We sought studies through an extensive search of electronic databases, journals, reference lists, contact with investigators and other search strategies outlined in the methods. The most recent search for this update was carried out in May 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included in the review if they assessed MA compared to placebo or other drug treatments in randomised controlled trials of patients with a clinical diagnosis of anorexia-cachexia syndrome related to cancer, AIDS or any other underlying pathology.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent review authors conducted data extraction and evaluated methodological quality. We performed quantitative analyses using appetite and quality of life as a dichotomous variable, and analysed weight gain as continuous and dichotomous variables.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 35 trials in this update, the same number but not the same trials as in the previous version of the review. The trials comprised 3963 patients for effectiveness and 3180 for safety. Sixteen trials compared MA at different doses with placebo, seven trials compared different doses of MA with other drug treatments and 10 trials compared different doses of MA. Meta-analysis showed a benefit of MA compared with placebo, particularly with regard to appetite improvement and weight gain in cancer, AIDS and other underlying conditions, and lack of benefit in the same patients when MA was compared to other drugs. There was insufficient information to define the optimal dose of MA, but higher doses were more related to weight improvement than lower doses. Quality of life improvement in patients was seen only when comparing MA versus placebo but not other drugs in both subcategories: cancer and AIDS. Oedema, thromboembolic phenomena and deaths were more frequent in the patients treated with MA. More than 40 side effects were studied.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review shows that MA improves appetite and is associated with slight weight gain in cancer, AIDS and in patients with other underlying pathology. Despite the fact that these patients are receiving palliative care they should be informed of the risks involved in taking MA.

Progesterone and related compounds in hepatocellular carcinoma: basic and clinical aspects

Primary liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third most common cause of cancer mortality. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 85% to 90% of primary liver cancers. Major risk factors for HCC include infection with HBV or HCV, alcoholic liver disease, and most probably nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. In general, men are two to four times more often associated with HCC than women. It can be suggested that sex hormones including progesterone may play some roles in HCC. Rather, very limited information discusses its potential involvement in HCC. This paper thus collects some recent studies of the potential involvement of progesterone and related compounds in HCC from basic and clinical aspects. In addition, two synthetic progestins, megestrol acetate (MA) and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), will be discussed thoroughly. It is noted that progesterone can also serve as the precursor for androgens and estrogens produced by the gonadal and adrenal cortical tissues, while men have a higher incidence of HCC than women might be due to the stimulatory effects of androgen and the protective effects of estrogen. Eventually, this paper suggests a new insight on the associations of progesterone and related compounds with HCC development and treatment.

Comparing Megestrol Acetate Therapy with Oxandrolone Therapy for HIV‐Related Weight Loss: Similar Results in 2 Months

Weight loss is known to impact survival among patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) even in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). In a randomized trial, we compared the effects of 2 months of treatment with either megestrol acetate (800 mg every day) or oxandrolone (10 mg twice per day) on body weight and composition in patients with weight loss of > or =5 kg who were receiving HAART. The mean weight was 66 kg, and the mean body mass index was 21. Mean weight gain in the megestrol acetate and the oxandrolone arms were 2.8 kg (4.6% of the baseline value) and 2.5 kg (3.9% of the baseline value), respectively (P=.80). Lean body mass accounted for 39% of weight gain in the megestrol acetate arm and 56% in the oxandrolone arm (P=.38). Seven patients in the megestrol acetate arm and 5 patients in the oxandrolone arm reported minor adverse events (P=.74). In conclusion, megestrol acetate therapy and oxandrolone therapy have similar effects on body weight and composition and are safe and well-tolerated during HAART.

Increased body weight and improved quality of life in AIDS patients following V-1 Immunitor administration

OBJECTIVES

Development of affordable and safe therapy to reverse the loss of body mass is of critical importance since AIDS-related wasting is associated with increased mortality.

METHOD

We have demonstrated earlier that oral therapeutic HIV vaccine, V-1 Immunitor (V1), tested in a small group of AIDS patients in Thailand not only increases T-cell counts and decreases the viral load but also results in weight gain and prolonged survival. To further expand this observation, we retrospectively analyzed 650 HIV-positive patients who were followed for an average of 23 weeks.

RESULTS

The treatment with V1 resulted in a sustained and statistically significant increase in body mass across the whole population (mean+/-s.e.; 1.5+/-0.4 kg; P=6.5E-015). Among them, 384 (59%) patients gained an average of 4.2+/-0.2 kg; 107 (17%) had unchanged weight; and 159 (24%) had lost 3.8+/-0.3 kg. Thus, the prevailing majority of patients (76%) were able to gain or maintain weight. Treatment was well tolerated; in a survey of health status in a comparable but separate group of 382 patients, about 85% reported subjective improvement after V1 treatment, 6% reported no difference, and 9% of the patients reported minor adverse reactions, which did not last more than 1 week. Subjective improvement coincides with the reduction or clearance of oral thrush or mucocutaneous candidiasis in 87.5% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In an open label setting, V1 increases body weight, subjective assessment of quality of life, and is safe and effective for HIV patients with weight loss. These data provide the impetus of using V-1 Immunitor as an affordable and easy-to-administer means of treating AIDS-associated wasting and opportunistic infections.