HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Awareness and Use Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Only and Men Who Have Sex with Both Men and Women

Racial Differences of Psychosocial Characteristics, HIV Risk-Taking and HIV Prevention Uptake between Men Who Have Sex with Men Only and Men Who Have Sex with Men and Women: A Community-Based Study in Two US Cities

Bisexual behavior preference plays an important role in shaping HIV risks among men who have sex with men (MSM), yet few studies have examined the racial differences in the patterns of sexual risk and HIV prevention uptake between men who have sex with men and women (MSMW) and men who have sex with men only (MSMO). We conducted a community-based study to identify and compare psychosocial characteristics, sexual risks, HIV testing frequency, and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) engagement between Black and White MSMW and MSMO in two US cities. Findings indicate that White MSMW were most likely to engage in HIV risk-taking behaviors (e.g., alcohol/drug use before sex, condomless/group sex), while Black MSMW were least likely to recently test for HIV or report awareness (aPR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.17-0.61), willingness (aPR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.30-0.98), and use (aPR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.31-0.93) of PrEP. Findings from our study supplement salient information for designing culturally tailored HIV prevention interventions for specific MSM subgroups in the US.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use, anticipated PrEP stigma, and bisexual identity among a Black and Hispanic/Latino sexual and gender diverse sample

Black and Hispanic/Latino sexual minority men and gender diverse (SMMGD) individuals are disproportionately impacted by the HIV epidemic. Uptake and adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is suboptimal among SMMGD Black and Hispanic/Latino individuals, but most research has approached this population as homogenous (e.g., a group operationalized as men who have sex with men). Bisexual men are less likely to disclose their sexual identity and report more mental health problems than their gay counterparts, but there is less attention to the impact of different sexual identities on PrEP use over time. We utilized data from three waves of a national longitudinal study (2020-2021) to characterize Black and Hispanic/Latino SMMGD participants' PrEP use including: 1) PrEP uptake during the study; 2) consistent PrEP use across the study; and 3) discontinuation of PrEP use since study baseline. We found bisexual men were significantly less likely than gay men to be consistent PrEP users and were more likely to discontinue PrEP use over the course of the study. Of the sample who reported PrEP use across surveys, 10% initiated PrEP during the study period, 0% of whom were bisexual. Additionally, bisexual participants reported statistically significantly higher anticipated PrEP stigma relative to gay participants. These findings have implications for HIV prevention interventions. Given the differences in PrEP experiences as a function of sexual identity, researchers and clinicians should consider the disruptive role of stigma (both biphobia and anticipated PrEP stigma) in PrEP care and adherence.