High Acceptability and Perceived Feasibility of Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Treatment Among People Living with HIV Who Are Viremic and Health Workers in Uganda

The potential promise and pitfalls of point-of-care viral load monitoring to expedite HIV treatment decision-making in rural Uganda: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

HIV treatment programs in Africa have implemented centralized testing for routine viral load monitoring (VLM), which may result in specimen processing delays inhibiting timely return of viral load results. Decentralized, point-of-care (PoC) VLM is a promising tool for expediting HIV clinical decision-making but remains unavailable in most African settings. We qualitatively explored the perceived feasibility and appropriateness of PoC VLM to address gaps along the viral load monitoring continuum in rural Uganda.

METHODS

Between May and September 2022, we conducted 15 in-depth interviews with HIV clinicians (facility in-charges, clinical officers, nurses, counselors) and six focus group discussions with 47 peer health workers from three south-central Ugandan districts. Topics explored centralized VLM implementation and opportunities/challenges to optimizing routine VLM implementation with PoC testing platforms. We explored perspectives on PoC VLM suitability and feasibility using iterative thematic analysis. Applying the Framework Method, we then mapped salient constraints and enablers of PoC VLM to constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

RESULTS

Clinicians and peers alike emphasized centralized viral load monitoring's resource-intensiveness and susceptibility to procedural/infrastructural bottlenecks (e.g., supply stockouts, testing backlogs, community tracing of clients with delayed VLM results), inhibiting timely clinical decision-making. Participants reacted enthusiastically to the prospect of PoC VLM, anticipating accelerated turnarounds in specimen processing, shorter and/or fewer client encounters with treatment services, and streamlined efficiencies in HIV care provision (including expedited VLM-driven clinical decision-making). Anticipated constraints to PoC VLM implementation included human resource requirements for processing large quantities of specimens (especially when machinery require repair), procurement and maintenance costs, training needs in the existing health workforce for operating point-of-care technology, and insufficient space in lower-tier health facilities to accommodate installation of new laboratory equipment.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticipated implementation challenges, primarily clustering around resource requirements, did not diminish enthusiasm for PoC VLM monitoring among rural Ugandan clinicians and peer health workers, who perceived PoC platforms as potential solutions to existing inefficiencies within the centralized VLM ecosystem. Prioritizing PoC VLM rollout in facilities with available resources for optimal implementation (e.g., adequate physical and fiscal infrastructure, capacity to manage high specimen volumes) could help overcome anticipated barriers to decentralizing viral load monitoring.

Long-acting injectable antiretroviral treatment: experiences of people with HIV and their healthcare providers in Uganda

INTRODUCTION

Long-acting injectable antiretroviral treatment (LAI-ART) has emerged as a novel alternative to the burden of daily oral pills. The bi-monthly intramuscular injectable containing cabotegravir and rilpivirine holds the promise of improving adherence to ART. The perspectives of potential users of LAI-ART, the majority of whom reside in Eastern and Southern Africa, are still largely unexplored. We set out to understand the experiences of people with HIV (PWH) who received LAI-ART at Fort Portal Regional Referral Hospital in mid-Western Uganda for at least 12 months.

METHODS

This qualitative study, conducted between July and August 2023, was nested within a larger study. We conducted four focus groups with 32 (out of 69) PWH who received intramuscular injections of cabotegravir and rilpivirine. In-depth interviews were held with six health workers who delivered LAI-ART to PWH. Data were analyzed by thematic approach broadly modeled on the five domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

RESULTS

There was high acceptability of LAI-ART (30 /32 or 94%) participants requested to remain on LAI-ART even after the end of the 12-month trial. Adherence to ART was reportedly improved when compared to daily oral treatment. Participants credited LAI-ART with; superior viral load suppression, redemption from the daily psychological reminder of living with HIV, enhanced privacy in HIV care and treatment, reduced HIV-related stigma associated with taking oral pills and that it absolved them from carrying bulky medication packages. Conversely, nine participants reported pain around the injection site and a transient fever soon after administering the injection as side effects of LAI-ART. Missed appointments for receiving the bi-monthly injection were common. Providers identified health system barriers to the prospective scale-up of LAI-ART which include the perceived high cost of LAI-ART, stringent cold chain requirements, physical space limitations, and workforce skills gaps in LAI-ART delivery as potential drawbacks.

CONCLUSION

Overall, PWH strongly preferred LAI-ART and expressed a comparatively higher satisfaction with this treatment alternative. Health system barriers to potential scale-up are essential to consider if a broader population of PWH will benefit from this novel HIV treatment option in Uganda and other resource-limited settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial Registry Number PACTR ID PACTR202104874490818 (registered on 16/04/2021).

Acceptability of Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Treatment for HIV Management: Perspectives of Patients and Physicians in Spain

We assessed the prevalence and factors associated with HIV-infected patients' interest in trying long-acting injectable antiretroviral treatment (LAI-ART) along with its expected benefits and concerns, and evaluated physicians' opinions about LAI-ART. This study was set within the multi-center prospective CoRIS cohort, comprising HIV-positive adults, naïve to antiretroviral treatment (ART) at study entry, recruited from 2004 onward in 48 centers in Spain. In June 2022, we conducted a 2-day cross-sectional survey among patients across 34 CoRIS centers and sent an online questionnaire to all physicians prescribing ART in 39 CoRIS centers. Of the 271 patients included, 83.3% [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 78.0 - 87.0%) expressed interest in receiving LAI-ART. This interest was higher among men (adjusted odds ratio: 2.96; 95% CI: 1.4-6.12), those aged <50 years (2.41; 1.23 - 4.73), and individuals inconvenienced by oral ART (5.03; 1.47 - 17.15), daily intake (14.65; 3.44-62.46), carrying HIV pills constantly (7.19; 2.88 - 17.96), and taking multiple medications (3.94; 1.58 - 9.85). Among the 154 physicians surveyed, 45.5% believed LAI-ART would be the preferred option for patients. Although most physicians (92.9%) thought LAI-ART could improve patients' quality of life (QoL), concerns were raised by 37.7% and 44.2% of them regarding injection site pain and visit rescheduling, respectively. Interest in LAI-ART was higher among men, those aged <50 years, and individuals finding their oral ART inconvenient. Physicians believed LAI-ART could improve QoL and overcome treatment challenges, yet concerns were raised about its potential usage difficulties. Although most patients were interested in receiving LAI-ART, only less than half of the physicians considered it their preferred option, likely owing to concerns about missed visits and injection site pain.

Patient Education and Decision Support for Long-Acting Injectable HIV Antiretroviral Therapy: Protocol for Tool Development and Pilot Testing with Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Medical Case Management Programs in New York

BACKGROUND

Long-acting injectable (LAI) HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) presents a major opportunity to facilitate and sustain HIV viral suppression, thus improving health and survival among people living with HIV and reducing the risk of onward transmission. However, realizing the public health potential of LAI ART requires reaching patients who face barriers to daily oral ART adherence and thus can clinically benefit from alternative treatment modalities. Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Part A medical case management (MCM) programs provide an array of services to address barriers to HIV care and treatment among economically and socially marginalized people living with HIV. These programs have demonstrated effectiveness in improving engagement along the continuum of care, but findings of limited program impact on durable viral suppression highlight the need to further innovate and hone strategies to support long-term ART adherence.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to adapt and expand Ryan White MCM service strategies to integrate LAI ART regimen options, with the larger goal of improving health outcomes in the populations that could most benefit from alternatives to daily oral ART regimens.

METHODS

In 3 phases of work involving patient and provider participants, this study uses role-specific focus groups to elicit perceptions of LAI versus daily oral ART; discrete choice experiment (DCE) surveys to quantify preferences for different ART delivery options and related supports; and a nonrandomized trial to assess the implementation and utility of newly developed tools at 6 partnering Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Part A MCM programs based in urban, suburban, and semirural areas of New York. Findings from the focus groups and DCEs, as well as feedback from advisory board meetings, informed the design and selection of the tools: a patient-facing, 2-page fact sheet, including frequently asked questions and a side-by-side comparison of LAI with daily oral ART; a patient-facing informational video available on YouTube (Google Inc); and a patient-provider decision aid. Implementation outcomes, measured through provider interviews, surveys, and service reporting, will guide further specification of strategies to integrate LAI ART options into MCM program workflows.

RESULTS

The study was funded in late April 2021 and received approval from the institutional review board in May 2021 under protocol 20-096. Focus groups were conducted in late 2021 (n=21), DCEs ran from June 2022 to January 2023 (n=378), and tools for piloting were developed by May 2023. The trial (May 2023 through January 2024) has enrolled >200 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is designed to provide evidence regarding the acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, and utility of a package of patient-oriented tools for comparing and deciding between LAI ART and daily oral ART options. Study strengths include formative work to guide tool development, a mixed methods approach, and the testing of tools in real-world safety-net service settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05833542; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05833542.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/56892.

Long-Acting Injectable Antiretrovirals for HIV Treatment: A Multi-Site Qualitative Study of Clinic-Level Barriers to Implementation in the United States

Long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LAI ART) has the potential to address adherence obstacles associated with daily oral ART, leading to enhanced treatment uptake, adherence, and viral suppression among people living with HIV (PLWH). Yet, its potential may be limited due to ongoing disparities in availability and accessibility. We need a better understanding of the organizational context surrounding the implementation of LAI ART, and to inform its widespread rollout, we conducted 38 in-depth interviews with medical and social service providers who offer HIV care at private and hospital-based clinics across six US cities. Our findings highlight real-world implementation barriers outside of clinical trial settings. Providers described ongoing and anticipated barriers across three stages of LAI ART implementation: (1) Patient enrollment (challenges registering patients and limited insurance coverage), (2) medication delivery (insufficient personnel and resources), and (3) leadership and management (lack of interprofessional coordination and a lack of programming guidelines). Providers described how these barriers would have a disproportionate impact on under-resourced clinics, potentially exacerbating existing disparities in LAI ART access and adherence. Our findings suggest strategies that clinic leadership, policymakers, and other stakeholders can pursue to promote rapid and equitable LAI ART implementation in clinics across the United States. Resource and staffing investments could support clinics to begin, sustain, and scale up LAI ART delivery; additionally, the establishment of guidelines and tools could facilitate wider adoption of LAI ART across clinical settings. These efforts are crucial to promote resourced, standardized, and equitable implementation of LAI ART and maximize its potential to help end the HIV epidemic.