Phase I-II study of radiopeptide 177Lu-octreotate in combination with capecitabine and temozolomide in advanced low-grade neuroendocrine tumors

Theranostic Innovation by Humane N-of-One Cancer Care in Real-World Patients

Patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic cancer unresponsive to standard therapies have motivated nuclear physicians to develop innovative radioligands, precisely targeted to tumor molecular receptors, for effective treatment of specific advanced malignancies. Individual practitioners in departments of nuclear medicine across the world have performed first-in-human studies on compassionate patient usage N-of-One protocols. These physician-sponsored studies then evolved into early-phase clinical trials and obtained real-world data to demonstrate real-world evidence of effectiveness in prolonging survival and enhancing quality of life of many so-called "End-Stage" cancer patients. Virtually all the therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals in current clinical oncology have been discovered and developed into effective specific treatments of targetable cancers by individual doctors in the course of their hospital practice. Pharma industry was not involved until many years later when performance of mandated Phase 3 randomized controlled trials became necessary to achieve regulatory agency approval. This article traces the history of several novel theranostic agents developed from compassionate N-of-One studies by hospital physicians over the past 36 years. It acknowledges the collegiality and collaboration of individual nuclear medicine specialists, worldwide, in pioneering effective humane therapy of particular advanced cancers unresponsive to conventional treatments.

Somatostatin Receptor Subtype-2 Targeting System for Specific Delivery of Temozolomide

Temozolomide (TMZ) is a DNA alkylating agent that produces objective responses in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) when the DNA repair enzyme O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is inactivated. At high doses, TMZ therapy exhausts MGMT activity but also produces dose-limiting toxicities. To reduce off-target effects, we converted the clinically approved radiotracer 68Ga-DOTA-TOC into a peptide-drug conjugate (PDC) for targeted delivery of TMZ to somatostatin receptor subtype-2 (SSTR2)-positive tumor cells. We used an integrated radiolabeling strategy for direct quantitative assessment of receptor binding, pharmacokinetics, and tissue biodistribution. In vitro studies revealed selective binding to SSTR2-positive cells with high affinity (5.98 ± 0.96 nmol/L), internalization, receptor-dependent DNA damage, cytotoxicity, and MGMT depletion. Imaging and biodistribution analysis showed preferential accumulation of the PDC in receptor-positive tumors and high renal clearance. This study identified a trackable SSTR2-targeting system for TMZ delivery and utilizes a modular design that could be broadly applied in PDC development.

Cancer Care by Committee to be Superseded by Personal Physician-Patient Partnership Informed by Artificial Intelligence

Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) have become the reference standard of cancer management, founded upon randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence-based guidelines. The inordinate delays inherent in awaiting formal regulatory agency approvals of novel therapeutic agents, and the rigidities and nongeneralizability of this regimented approach, often deny cancer patients timely access to effective innovative treatment. Reluctance of MTBs to accept theranostic care of patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer resulted in decades of delay in the incorporation of 177Lu-octreotate and 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) into routine clinical oncology practice. Recent developments in immunotherapy and molecular targeted precision therapy, based on N-of-One individual multifactorial genome analyses, have greatly increased the complexity of decision-making. Burgeoning specialist workload and tight time frames now threaten to overwhelm the logistically, and emotionally, demanding MTB system. It is hypothesized that the advent of advanced artificial intelligence technology and Chatbot natural language algorithms will shift the cancer care paradigm from a MTB management model toward a personal physician-patient shared-care partnership for real-world practice of precision individualized holistic oncology.

Capecitabine and Temozolomide (CAPTEM) in Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NENs): A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

Background

Retrospective studies and single center experiences suggest a role of capecitabine combined with temozolomide (CAPTEM) in neuroendocrine tumors (NENs).

Methods

We performed a systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of CAPTEM in patients affected with NENs, with the aim to better clarify the role of this regimen in the therapeutic algorithm of NENs.

Results

A total of 42 articles and 1818 patients were included in our review. The overall disease control rate was 77% (range 43.5%-100%). The median progression free survival ranged from 4 to 38.5 months, while the median overall survival ranged from 8 to 103 months. Safety analysis showed an occurrence of G3-G4 toxicities in 16.4% of the entire population. The most common toxicities were hematological (27.2%), gastrointestinal (8.3%,) and cutaneous (3.2%).

Conclusion

This systematic review demonstrated that CAPTEM was an effective and relatively safe treatment for patients with advanced well-moderate differentiated NENs of gastroenteropancreatic, lung and unknown origin.

Optimisation of radioligand therapy in neuroendocrine tumours: Current and evolving evidence

Treatment of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) with radioligand therapy (RLT) for example, ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE is generally well-tolerated and prolongs time to progression in most patients. However, approximately 20% of patients are nonresponders. In addition, complete responses are rare (<5% of patients), and durable responses beyond 3-4 years are uncommon. This article will discuss factors which may improve the outcomes of PRRT by using biomarkers to identify patients at high risk to be nonresponders (imaging and liquid biomarkers) and will examine mechanisms to potentially improve/optimise current RLT treatment strategies. These include mechanisms to potentiate the effects of RLT, increase tumour absorbed dose, overcoming radio-resistance and upregulation of somatostatin receptors, although larger studies will be required to demonstrate which techniques are going to be most efficacious in clinical practice.

Therapy Resistant Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are a heterogenous group of malignancies originating from neuroendocrine cells of the gastrointestinal tract, the incidence of which has been increasing for several decades. While there has been significant progress in the development of therapeutic options for patients with advanced or metastatic disease, these remain limited both in quantity and durability of benefit. This review examines the latest research elucidating the mechanisms of both up-front resistance and the eventual development of resistance to the primary systemic therapeutic options including somatostatin analogues, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with lutetium Lu 177 dotatate, everolimus, sunitinib, and temozolomide-based chemotherapy. Further, potential strategies for overcoming these mechanisms of resistance are reviewed in addition to a comprehensive review of ongoing and planned clinical trials addressing this important challenge.

Clinical Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Clinical Practice: A Formal Consensus Exercise

Simple Summary

Well-structured international guidelines are currently available regarding the management of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). However, in relation to the multiplicity of treatments and the relative rarity and heterogeneity of NENs, there are many controversial issues in which clinical evidence is insufficient and for which expert opinion can be of help. A group of experts selected 14 relevant topics and formulated relative statements concerning controversial issues in several areas on diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutic strategies, and patient follow-up. Specific statements have also been formulated regarding patient management on radioligand therapy (RLT), as well as in the presence of co-morbidities or bone metastases. All the statements were drafted, discussed, modified, and then approved. The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) method was used to obtain consensus. The results of this paper can facilitate the clinical approach of patients with NENs in daily practice in areas where there is scarcity or absence of clinical evidence.

Abstract

Many treatment approaches are now available for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). While several societies have issued guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of NENs, there are still areas of controversy for which there is limited guidance. Expert opinion can thus be of support where firm recommendations are lacking. A group of experts met to formulate 14 statements relative to diagnosis and treatment of NENs and presented herein. The nominal group and estimate-talk-estimate techniques were used. The statements covered a broad range of topics from tools for diagnosis to follow-up, evaluation of response, treatment efficacy, therapeutic sequence, and watchful waiting. Initial prognostic characterization should be based on clinical information as well as histopathological analysis and morphological and functional imaging. It is also crucial to optimize RLT for patients with a NEN starting from accurate characterization of the patient and disease. Follow-up should be patient/tumor tailored with a shared plan about timing and type of imaging procedures to use to avoid safety issues. It is also stressed that patient-reported outcomes should receive greater attention, and that a multidisciplinary approach should be mandatory. Due to the clinical heterogeneity and relative lack of definitive evidence for NENs, personalization of diagnostic–therapeutic work-up is crucial.

In patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours, there is no apparent benefit of somatostatin analogues after disease control by peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

PURPOSE

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and somatostatin analogues (SSAs) are commonly combined as primary treatment for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), and SSAs given as maintenance. We sought to evaluate whether sequential therapy with PRRT followed by SSAs has progression or survival benefits in patients with NEN after disease control by PRRT.

METHODS

This prospective, randomised, single-centre study had as principal eligibility criteria: unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic, histologically confirmed well-differentiated NEN; no symptoms/biochemical diagnosis of carcinoid syndrome; no SSAs or ≤ 3 months of SSAs before PRRT; and stable disease or partial or complete response after PRRT. Altogether, 115 patients were randomised 2:1 to an SSA group (n = 74) given octreotide acetate LAR every 4 weeks, or a control group (n = 41) receiving only best supportive care. Octreotide treatment was to stop upon intolerable toxicity or patient refusal, or, at physician/patient discretion, upon NEN progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), the secondary endpoint, and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median (25th-75th percentile) follow-up from the first PRRT activity to death or latest observation was 6.6 (3.18-10.22) years. During that time, 71/115 patients (62%) progressed, 52/74 (70%) in the SSA group, and 19/41 (46%) in the control group (p = 0.01). Eighty-eight/115 patients (76%) died, 58/74 (78%) in the SSA group, and 30/41 (73%) in the control group (p = 0.52). Median (95% CI) PFS was 4.7 (2.8-7.7) years in the SSA group, and 6.4 (4.1-not reached) years in controls. Overall, median OS was 6.6 years. Neither PFS nor OS differed between groups (p = 0.129, p = 0.985, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with disease control after PRRT, subsequent SSA treatment appeared not to be associated with better PFS or OS. Whether to continue SSA administration upon progression after PRRT requires evaluation in a prospective, randomised, controlled multicentre study with a relatively homogeneous sample.

Long-term survival and toxicity in patients with neuroendocrine tumors treated with 177 Lu-octreotate peptide radionuclide therapy

BACKGROUND

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has shown favorable results in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Long-term safety and efficacy data for ¹⁷⁷ Lu-octreotate PRRT, particularly in combination with chemotherapy, is lacking.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of the long-term toxicity and survival outcomes of 104 patients with advanced NETs treated on 4 phase 2 clinical trials with Lutetium-177-octreotate (¹⁷⁷ Lu-octreotate) PRRT, mostly in combination with chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 68 months, which represents the longest follow-up study of ¹⁷⁷ Lu-octreotate PRRT for NETs to date.

RESULTS

Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 37 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 71 months. Five- and 10-year OS were 62% and 29%, and 5- and 10-year PFS were 36% and 21%, respectively, demonstrating ¹⁷⁷ Lu-octreotate can provide durable responses. PRRT was well tolerated with 1.9% of patients developing chronic renal impairment and 1% of patients developing long-term thrombocytopenia. Interestingly, there was a relatively high rate of myelodysplasia (MDS)/leukemia (6.7%), possibly attributable to the longer follow-up (with all except 1 case occurring more than 4 years after PRRT treatment) or to the addition of concurrent chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Lutetium-177-Octreotate PRRT remains an efficacious and well tolerated treatment in long-term follow-up. For clinicians deciding on the timing of PRRT for individual patients, the 6.7% long-term risk of MDS/leukemia needs to be balanced against the 21% PFS at 10 years.

Therapeutic strategies for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: State-of-the-art and future perspectives

Although gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) have always been considered rare tumors, their incidence has risen over the past few decades. They represent a highly heterogeneous group of neoplasms with several prognostic factors, including disease stage, proliferative index (Ki67), and tumor differentiation. Most of these neoplasms express somatostatin receptors on the cell surface, a feature that has important implications in terms of prognosis, diagnosis, and therapy. Although International Guidelines propose algorithms aimed at guiding therapeutic strategies, GEP-NEN patients are still very different from one another, and the need for personalized treatment continues to increase. Radical surgery is always the best option when feasible; however, up to 80% of cases are metastatic upon diagnosis. Regarding medical treatments, as GEP-NENs are characterized by relatively long overall survival, multiple therapy lines are adopted during the lifetime of these patients, but the optimum sequence to be followed has never been clearly defined. Furthermore, although new molecular markers aimed at predicting the response to therapy, as well as prognostic scores, are currently being studied, their application is still far from being part of daily clinical practice. As they represent a complex disease, with therapeutic protocols that are not completely standardized, GEP-NENs require a multidisciplinary approach. This review will provide an overview of the available therapeutic options for GEP-NENs and attempts to clarify the possible approaches for the management of these patients and to discuss future perspectives in this field.

Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogues for Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Simple Summary

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare and heterogeneous tumors, presenting in often challenging clinical scenarios, and require multidisciplinary discussion for optimal care. The theranostic approach (DOTA peptides labelled with ⁶⁸Ga for imaging well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors NETs, and labelled with ⁹⁰Y or ¹⁷⁷Lu for therapy) plays a crucial role in the management of NENs to assess disease extension and criteria for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) eligibility of based on somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression. The present paper is an overview of currently employed radiolabeled SSTR analogues used for both diagnosis and therapy of NENs. Further emerging radiopharmaceuticals targeting SSTRs (e.g., fluorinated SSTR agonists, radiolabeled SSTR antagonists) as well as strategies to improve PRRT efficacy (by means of implementation of personalized treatment schemes, dosimetry, amelioration of response assessment strategies, and optimization of treatment sequencing) are also discussed. Finally, although very preliminary, some studies employing radiomic features in various kinds of NET are reported.

Abstract

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare and heterogeneous tumors that require multidisciplinary discussion for optimal care. The theranostic approach (DOTA peptides labelled with ⁶⁸Ga for diagnosis and with ⁹⁰Y or ¹⁷⁷Lu for therapy) plays a crucial role in the management of NENs to assess disease extension and as a criteria for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) eligibility based on somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression. On the diagnostic side, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA peptides PET/CT (SSTR PET/CT) is the gold standard for imaging well-differentiated SSTR-expressing neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT is useful in higher grade NENs (NET G2 with Ki-67 > 10% and NET G3; NEC) for more accurate disease characterization and prognostication. Promising emerging radiopharmaceuticals include somatostatin analogues labelled with ¹⁸F (to overcome the limits imposed by ⁶⁸Ga), and SSTR antagonists (for both diagnosis and therapy). On the therapeutic side, the evidence gathered over the past two decades indicates that PRRT is to be considered as an effective and safe treatment option for SSTR-expressing NETs, and is currently included in the therapeutic algorithms of the main scientific societies. The positioning of PRRT in the treatment sequence, as well as treatment personalization (e.g., tailored dosimetry, re-treatment, selection criteria, and combination with other alternative treatment options), is warranted in order to improve its efficacy while reducing toxicity. Although very preliminary (being mostly hampered by lack of methodological standardization, especially regarding feature selection/extraction) and often including small patient cohorts, radiomic studies in NETs are also presented. To date, the implementation of radiomics in clinical practice is still unclear. The purpose of this review is to offer an overview of radiolabeled SSTR analogues for theranostic use in NENs.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Targeting the Somatostatin Receptor: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Optimization Strategies

Simple Summary

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a systemic treatment consisting of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. This will subsequently cause lethal DNA damage to the tumor cell. The only target that is currently used in widespread clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor, which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review focuses on the basic principles and clinical applications of PRRT, and discusses several PRRT-optimization strategies.

Abstract

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) consists of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. The only target that is currently used in clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor (SSTR), which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review provides a summary of the treatment efficacy (e.g., response rates and symptom-relief), impact on patient outcome and toxicity profile of PRRT performed with different generations of SSTR-targeting radiopharmaceuticals, including the landmark randomized-controlled trial NETTER-1. In addition, multiple optimization strategies for PRRT are discussed, i.e., the dose–effect concept, dosimetry, combination therapies (i.e., tandem/duo PRRT, chemoPRRT, targeted molecular therapy, somatostatin analogues and radiosensitizers), new radiopharmaceuticals (i.e., SSTR-antagonists, Evans-blue containing vector molecules and alpha-emitters), administration route (intra-arterial versus intravenous) and response prediction via molecular testing or imaging. The evolution and continuous refinement of PRRT resulted in many lessons for the future development of radionuclide therapy aimed at other targets and tumor types.

Myeloid Toxicity of Radionuclide Cancer Therapy

Emergent genomic analytic techniques in patients with cancer offer the potential to define the risk of myelo dysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute leukemia (AL) manifesting following targeted radionuclide therapy of metastatic lymphoma, neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and prostate cancer. Characterization of the genetic profile will allow risk stratification of patients before theranostic radionuclide management of advanced cancers and offers the opportunity to minimize toxicity while preserving optimal individualized efficacy in the practice of personalized precision nuclear oncology. Our review of a single-center experience of prospective radionuclide theranostic management of metastatic non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), NETs, and castration-resistant prostate cancer (metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer [mCRPC]) over the past decade, and comparison with published studies, shows that while the risk of significant myelotoxicity is generally low, at <3%, the consequences in the small minority of patients who develop MDS or AL are substantial, and survival is poor. Timely identification of patients at heightened risk of hematologic toxic complication, using novel genomic technology before institution of radionuclide therapy, will facilitate amelioration of myelotoxicity. In current clinical practice, the minimal hematological toxicity of chemo-free theranostic management of advanced cancer is significantly less compared with newly adopted chemotherapy -immunotherapy regimens, and the financial toxicity associated with these novel agents is avoided.

Theragnostic in neuroendocrine tumors

In the last few decades, the incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine tumors has been increasing. The theragnostic approach, that allows the diagnosis and treatment of different neoplasms with the same ligand, is a typical nuclear medicine tool. Applied for years, is also pivotal in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) where it has improved the diagnostic accuracy and the therapeutic efficacy with impact on patient's survival. Theragnostic also allows the identification of important prognostic factors such as tumor location and burden, presence of liver metastases and intensity of somatostatin receptors (SSTR) expression to consider in new and possibly combined studies to ameliorate patient's outcome. Moreover, the possibility to evaluate receptor expression even in non-NET malignancies has de facto widened the possible indications for PRRT. We believe that this innovative therapeutic approach will be implemented in next years by radiomics and biological tumors characterization to better address PRRT applications.

Optimizing the Schedule of PARP Inhibitors in Combination with 177Lu-DOTATATE: A Dosimetry Rationale

¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE for neuroendocrine tumours is considered a low-toxicity treatment and may therefore be combined with other pharmaceuticals to potentiate its efficacy. One approach is to add a poly-[ADP-ribose]-polymerase (PARP) inhibitor to decrease the ability of tumour cells to repair ¹⁷⁷Lu-induced DNA damage. To decrease the risk of side effects, the sequencing should be optimized according to the tumour-to-normal tissue enhanced dose ratio (TNED). The aim of this study was to investigate how to enhance ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE by optimal timing of the addition of a PARP inhibitor. Biokinetic modelling was performed based on the absorbed dose to the bone marrow, kidneys and tumour; determined from SPECT/CT and planar images from 17 patients treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE. To investigate the theoretical enhanced biological effect of a PARP inhibitor during ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE treatment, the concept of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was used, and PARP inhibitor administration was simulated over different time intervals. The absorbed dose rate for the tumour tissue demonstrated an initial increase phase until 12 h after infusion followed by a slow decrease. In contrast, the bone marrow showed a rapid initial dose rate decrease. Twenty-eight days after infusion of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE, the full absorbed dose to the bone marrow and kidney was reached. Using an RBE value of 2 for both the tumour and normal tissues, the TNED was increased compared to ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE alone. According to the modelling, the PARP inhibitor should be introduced approximately 24 h after the start of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE treatment and be continued for up to four weeks to optimize the TNED. Based on these results, a phase I trial assessing the combination of olaparib and ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE in somatostatin receptor-positive tumours was launched in 2020 (NCT04375267).

Combination Therapies with PRRT

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a successful targeted radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, complete responses remain elusive. Combined treatments anticipate synergistic effects and thus better responses by combining ionizing radiation with other anti-tumor treatments. Furthermore, multimodal therapies often have a balanced toxicity profile. To date, few studies have evaluated the effect of combination therapies with PRRT, some of them phase I/II trials. This review will focus on several clinically tested, tailored approaches to improving the effects of PRRT. The aim is to help clinicians in the treatment planning of NETs to choose the most effective and safe treatment for each patient in the sense of personalized medicine. Current promising combination partners of PRRT are somatostatin analogues (SSAs), chemotherapy, molecular targeted treatment, liver radioembolization, and dual radionuclide PRRT (Lutetium-177-PRRT combined with Yttrium-90-PRRT).

Chemotherapy in Neuroendocrine Tumors

The role for cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) remains debated. Compared to patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) where chemotherapy is utilized ubiquitously, chemotherapy may play a more select role in patients with certain types of NETs (e.g., pancreatic tumors, higher grade tumors, and tumors possessing DNA damage repair defects). The primary types of chemotherapy that have been tested in patients with NETs include alkylating agent- and platinum agent-based combinations. Across regimens, chemotherapy appears to elicit greater antitumor activity in patients with pancreatic or grade 3 NETs. The role for chemotherapy in lower grade extra-pancreatic NETs remains undefined. Furthermore, while chemotherapy has demonstrated clinically meaningful benefit for patients in the systemic setting, its role in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting is as-of-yet undetermined. Finally, efforts to combine chemotherapy with targeted therapy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy are ongoing, in hopes of improving the cytoreductive treatment options for patients with NETs.

Chemotherapy in NEN: still has a role?

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) comprise a broad spectrum of tumors with widely variable biological and clinical behavior. Primary tumor site, extent of disease, tumor differentiation and expression of so matostatin receptors, proliferation and growth rates are the major prognostic factors that determine the therapeutic strategy. Treatment options for advanced disease have considerably expanded in recent years, particularly for well differentiated tumors (NETs). Novel drugs approved over the past decade in this context include somatostatin analogues and ¹⁷⁷Lu-oxodotreotide for somatostatin-receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NETs, sunitinib for pancreatic NETs (P-NETs), and everolimus for P-NETs and non-functioning lung or gastrointestinal NETs. Nevertheless, chemotherapy remains an essential component of the treatment armamentarium of patients with NENs, particularly of patients with P-NETs or those with bulky, symptomatic or rapidly progressive tumors (generally G3 or high-G2 NENs). In this manuscript we will comprehensively review available evidence related to the use of chemotherapy in lung and GEP NENs and will critically discuss its role in the treatment algorithm of this family of neoplasms.

Neuroendocrine Tumor Theranostics: An Update and Emerging Applications in Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVE. Theranostics have shown great promise for delivering precision medicine, particularly in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The clinical applications of radiolabeled somatostatin analogues in imaging and radionuclide therapy have been rapidly increasing over the past 2 decades and are currently integrated into the management guidelines of NETs. This article summarizes the available literature on different somatostatin receptor-targeting radiopharmaceuticals with theranostic potential in NETs, pheochromocytomas, and paragangliomas. We discuss the clinical application, administration, and toxicity of recent FDA-approved radionuclide therapies, including ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE in advanced gastroenteropancreatic NETs and ¹³¹I-MIBG in advanced paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas. CONCLUSION. Several studies support the safety and clinical efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapies in disease control and quality-of-life improvement in patients with NETs and report potential benefits of combined radionuclide treatment approaches. The utility and pitfalls of functional imaging in therapy response assessment and surveillance of NETs remain to be established.

Combination radionuclide therapy: A new paradigm

Targeted molecular radionuclide therapy (MRT) has shown its potential for the treatment of cancers of multiple origins. A combination therapy strategy employing two or more distinct therapeutic approaches in cancer management is aimed at circumventing tumor resistance by simultaneously targeting compensatory signaling pathways or bypassing survival selection mutations acquired in response to individual monotherapies. Combination radionuclide therapy (CRT) is a newer application of the concept, utilizing a combination of radiolabeled molecular targeting agents with chemotherapy and beam radiation therapy for enhanced therapeutic index. Encouraging results are reported with chemotherapeutic agents in combination with radiolabeled targeting molecules for cancer therapy. With increasing awareness of the various survival and stress response pathways activated after radionuclide therapy, different holistic combinations of MRT agents with radiosensitizers targeting such pathways have also been explored. MRT has also been studied in combination with beam radiotherapy modalities such as external beam radiation therapy and carbon ion radiation therapy to enhance the anti-tumor response. Nanotechnology aids in CRT by bringing together multiple monotherapies on a single nanostructure platform for treating cancers in a more precise or personalized way. CRT will be a key player in managing cancers if correctly tailored to the individual patient profile. The success of CRT lies in an in-depth understanding of the radiobiological principles and pathways activated in response.

Combination Therapy, a Promising Approach to Enhance the Efficacy of Radionuclide and Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Prostate and Breast Cancer

In recent years, radionuclide therapy (RT) and targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) have gained great interest in cancer treatment. This is due to promising results obtained in both preclinical and clinical studies. However, a complete response is achieved in only a small percentage of patients that receive RT or TRT. As a consequence, there have been several strategies to improve RT and TRT outcomes including the combination of these treatments with other well-established anti-cancer therapies, for example, chemotherapy. Combinations of RT and TRT with other therapies with distinct mechanisms of action represent a promising strategy. As for prostate cancer and breast cancer, the two most prevalent cancer types worldwide, several combination-based therapies have been evaluated. In this review, we will provide an overview of the RT and TRT agents currently used or being investigated in combination with hormone therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and external beam radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer and breast cancer.

EANM position paper on the role of radiobiology in nuclear medicine

With an increasing variety of radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic or therapeutic nuclear medicine as valuable diagnostic or treatment option, radiobiology plays an important role in supporting optimizations. This comprises particularly safety and efficacy of radionuclide therapies, specifically tailored to each patient. As absorbed dose rates and absorbed dose distributions in space and time are very different between external irradiation and systemic radionuclide exposure, distinct radiation-induced biological responses are expected in nuclear medicine, which need to be explored. This calls for a dedicated nuclear medicine radiobiology. Radiobiology findings and absorbed dose measurements will enable an improved estimation and prediction of efficacy and adverse effects. Moreover, a better understanding on the fundamental biological mechanisms underlying tumor and normal tissue responses will help to identify predictive and prognostic biomarkers as well as biomarkers for treatment follow-up. In addition, radiobiology can form the basis for the development of radiosensitizing strategies and radioprotectant agents. Thus, EANM believes that, beyond in vitro and preclinical evaluations, radiobiology will bring important added value to clinical studies and to clinical teams. Therefore, EANM strongly supports active collaboration between radiochemists, radiopharmacists, radiobiologists, medical physicists, and physicians to foster research toward precision nuclear medicine.

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are a rare group of cancers accounting for about 1-2% of all pancreatic neoplasms. About 10% of pNETs arise within endocrine tumor syndromes, such as Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). pNETs affect 30-80% of MEN1 patients, manifesting prevalently as multiple microadenomas. pNETs in patients with MEN1 are particularly difficult to treat due to differences in their growth potential, their multiplicity, the frequent requirement of extensive surgery, the high rate of post-operative recurrences, and the concomitant development of other tumors. MEN1 syndrome is caused by germinal heterozygote inactivating mutation of the MEN1 gene, encoding the menin tumor suppressor protein. MEN1-related pNETs develop following the complete loss of function of wild-type menin. Menin is a key regulator of endocrine cell plasticity and its loss in these cells is sufficient for tumor initiation. Somatic biallelic loss of wild-type menin in the neuroendocrine pancreas presumably alters the epigenetic control of gene expression, mediated by histone modifications and DNA hypermethylation, as a driver of MEN1-associated pNET tumorigenesis. In this light, epigenetic-based therapies aimed to correct the altered DNA methylation, and/or histone modifications might be a possible therapeutic strategy for MEN1 pNETs, for whom standard treatments fail.

Clinical Utility of 18F-FDG PET in Neuroendocrine Tumors Prior to Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Functional imaging with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET) has evolved into a major clinical tool in cancer diagnosis and management for many malignancies in diverse clinical settings, providing valuable information on tumor behavior and aggressiveness. In the field of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), recent advances in molecular imaging and targeted treatments with novel theranostic agents favor a more patient-tailored approach. Although peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has recently become an established therapy for progressive NETs, the role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET prior to PRRT in patients with NETs of different origins and grades remains to be determined. Herein, we provide a comprehensive summary of available evidence in contemporary literature by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis, demonstrating that dual-functional imaging with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-peptides and ¹⁸F-FDG prior to PRRT appears to be a useful tool in NET management by delineating tumor somatostatin receptor expression and glycolytic metabolic activity, and predicting tumor response and survival outcomes.

Abstract

The role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET in patients with variable grades of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) prior to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has not been adequately elucidated. We aimed to evaluate the impact of ¹⁸F-FDG PET status on disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients receiving PRRT. We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to July 2020 and used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) criteria to assess quality/risk of bias. A total of 5091 articles were screened. In 12 studies, 1492 unique patients with NETs of different origins were included. The DCR for patients with negative ¹⁸F-FDG PET status prior to PRRT initiation was 91.9%, compared to 74.2% in patients with positive ¹⁸F-FDG PET status (random effects odds ratio (OR): 4.85; 95% CI: 2.27–10.36). Adjusted analysis of pooled hazard ratios (HRs) confirmed longer PFS and OS in NET patients receiving PRRT with negative ¹⁸F-FDG PET (random effects HR:2.45; 95%CIs: 1.48–4.04 and HR:2.25; 95% CIs:1.55–3.28, respectively). In conclusion, ¹⁸F-FDG PET imaging prior to PRRT administration appears to be a useful tool in NET patients to predict tumor response and survival outcomes and a negative FDG uptake of the tumor is associated with prolonged PFS and OS.

Temozolomide: An Updated Overview of Resistance Mechanisms, Nanotechnology Advances and Clinical Applications

Temozolomide (TMZ), an oral alkylating prodrug which delivers a methyl group to purine bases of DNA (O6-guanine; N7-guanine and N3-adenine), is frequently used together with radiotherapy as part of the first-line treatment of high-grade gliomas. The main advantages are its high oral bioavailability (almost 100% although the concentration found in the cerebrospinal fluid was approximately 20% of the plasma concentration of TMZ), its lipophilic properties, and small size that confer the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Furthermore, this agent has demonstrated activity not only in brain tumors but also in a variety of solid tumors. However, conventional therapy using surgery, radiation, and TMZ in glioblastoma results in a median patient survival of 14.6 months. Treatment failure has been associated with tumor drug resistance. This phenomenon has been linked to the expression of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase, but the mismatch repair system and the presence of cancer stem-like cells in tumors have also been related to TMZ resistance. The understanding of these mechanisms is essential for the development of new therapeutic strategies in the clinical use of TMZ, including the use of nanomaterial delivery systems and the association with other chemotherapy agents. The aim of this review is to summarize the resistance mechanisms of TMZ and the current advances to improve its clinical use.

Targeted Cancer Therapy: What's New in the Field of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms?

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous family of neoplasms of increasing incidence and high prevalence due to their relatively indolent nature. Their wide anatomic distribution and their characteristic ability to secrete hormonally active substances pose unique challenges for clinical management. They are also characterized by the common expression of somatostatin receptors, a target that has been extremely useful for diagnosis and treatment (i.e., somatostatin analogues (SSAs) and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)). Chemotherapy is of limited use for NETs of non-pancreatic origin, and the only approved targeted agents for advanced progressive NETs are sunitinib for those of pancreatic origin, and everolimus for lung, gastrointestinal and pancreatic primaries. Despite recent therapeutic achievements, thus, systemic treatment options remain limited. In this review we will discuss the state-of-the-art targeted therapies in the field of NETs, and also future perspectives of novel therapeutic drugs or strategies in clinical development, including recently presented results from randomized trials of yet unapproved antiangiogenic agents (i.e., pazopanib, surufatinib and axitinib), PRRT including both approved radiopharmaceuticals (177Lu-Oxodotreotide) and others in development (177Lu-Edotreotide, 177Lu-Satoreotide Tetraxetan), immunotherapy and other innovative targeted strategies (antibody-drug conjugates, bites,…) that shall soon improve the landscape of personalized treatment options in NET patients.

Somatostatin receptor radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumors

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using 177Lu-DOTATATE has been approved for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic NETs. An understanding of benefits and risks is important for the appropriate implementation of this therapy. This review summarizes study data supporting the use of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs for the treatment of advanced NETs and highlights risks, including potential toxicities in specific populations. Key ongoing clinical trials, including randomized studies, are designed to better define the position of PRRT within the broader therapeutic landscape. Preclinical and early-phase human studies are focused on the development of novel somatostatin-receptor agonists and antagonists, new radionuclides, and radiosensitizing combination therapies.

Combined use of 177Lu-DOTATATE and metronomic capecitabine (Lu-X) in FDG-positive gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

FDG-positive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have a poorer prognosis and exhibit shorter response duration to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). The aim of this prospective phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of PRRT with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE associated with metronomic capecitabine as a radiosensitizer agent in patients with advanced progressive FDG-positive gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) NETs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced somatostatin receptor- and FDG-positive G1-G3 GEP-NETs (Ki67 < 55%) were treated with a cumulative activity of 27.5 GBq of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE divided in five cycles of 5.5 GBq each every 8 weeks. Capecitabine (1000-1500 mg daily) was administered orally in the inter-cycle period between ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE treatments. Prior to commencing capecitabine, all patients were triaged with the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) test. Only DPD-proficient individuals were enrolled. The primary objectives were disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Secondary aims included progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Treatment response was assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Toxicity was assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.

RESULTS

From August 2015 to December 2016, 37 subjects were consecutively enrolled. A total of 25 (68%) were affected by pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (P-NETs), and 12 (32%) had gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs). By grading (WHO 2010 classification), 12 patients (32%) had G1 (Ki67 ≤ 2%), 22 (59%) had G2 (3% < Ki67 ≤ 20%), and 3 patients (9%) had G3 (Ki67 > 20%) NETs. Grade 3 (G3) or 4 (G4) hematological toxicity occurred in 16.2% of patients. Other G3-G4 adverse events were diarrhea in 5.4% of cases and asthenia in 5.4%. No renal toxicity was observed for the duration of follow-up. In 37 patients, 33 were evaluable for response. Objective responses included partial response (PR) in 10 patients (30%) and stable disease (SD) in 18 patients (55%), with a DCR of 85%. The median follow-up was 38 months (range 4.6-51.1 months). The median PFS was 31.4 months (17.6-45.4), and mOS was not reached.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the combination of PRRT with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE and metronomic capecitabine is active and well tolerated in patients with aggressive FDG-positive G1-G3 GEP-NETs. These data constitute the basis for a randomized study of PPRT alone vs. PRRT plus metronomic capecitabine.

Chemotherapy-Induced Upregulation of Somatostatin Receptor-2 Increases the Uptake and Efficacy of 177Lu-DOTA-Octreotate in Neuroendocrine Tumor Cells

Simple Summary

The peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-octreotate (LuTate) is recommended for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) which overexpress somatostatin receptors (SSTR). A combination of LuTate with chemotherapy improves its objective response in NET patients, and here we characterized chemotherapy-induced upregulation of SSTR2 receptors as a cause for this improved response to LuTate. Using multiple NET and non-NET cell lines, we examined the SSTR2 expression for up to 7 days after exposure to drugs and its effect on LuTate uptake and cell proliferation. We report that the exposure to varying doses of chemotherapeutic drugs such as temozolomide for 24 h or 5 days results in upregulation of SSTR2 receptors between 3–7 days. This effect is more pronounced in low SSTR2 expressing BON-1 cells than in high SSTR2 expressing NCI-H727 or non-NET cancer or non-cancer cells. Thus, a properly-timed pre-treatment with low doses of chemotherapy could improve therapeutic efficacy of LuTate in NET patients.

Abstract

The peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-octreotate (LuTate) is recommended for different types of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) which overexpress somatostatin receptors (SSTR). A combination with chemotherapy improves objective response to LuTate in NET patients and here we characterized chemotherapy-induced upregulation of SSTR2 receptors as a cause for this improved response to LuTate. The NET cell lines with low (BON-1) or relatively high (NCI-H727) SSTR2-expression levels, and non-NET cancer and normal cells were treated with chemotherapeutic drugs and assessed for upregulation of SSTR2. We report that an exposure to low or high doses of drugs, such as temozolomide for 24 h or 5 day results in upregulation of SSTR2 between 3–7 days, increased LuTate uptake and decreased rate of cell proliferation. This effect is at the level of SSTR2-mRNA and is more pronounced in low SSTR2 expressing BON-1 than in high SSTR2 expressing NCI-H727 or non-NET cancer or normal cells. Thus, a properly timed pre-treatment with low-dose chemotherapy could not only improve therapeutic efficacy of LuTate in NET patients who are presently eligible for PRRT, but also allow PRRT to be administered to patients with low SSTR-expressing NETs, who would otherwise not respond to this modality because of insufficient radiation delivery.

The State of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy and Its Sequencing among Current Therapeutic Options for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are the most common form of neuroendocrine neoplasia, but there is no current consensus for the sequencing of approved therapies, particularly with respect to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). This comprehensive review evaluates the data supporting approved therapies for GEP-NETs and recommendations for therapeutic sequencing with a focus on how PRRT currently fits within sequencing algorithms. The current recommendations for PRRT sequencing restrict its use to metastatic, inoperable, progressive midgut NETs; however, this may change with emerging data to suggest that PRRT might be beneficial as neoadjuvant therapy for inoperable tumors, is more tolerable than other treatment modalities following first-line standard dose somatostatin analogs, and can be used as salvage therapy after disease relapse following prior successful cycles of PRRT. PRRT has also been shown to reduce tumor burden, improve quality of life, and prolong the time to disease progression in a broad spectrum of patients with GEP-NETs. As the various potential benefits of PRRT in GEP-NET therapy continues to expand, it is necessary to review and critically evaluate our treatment algorithms for GEP-NETs.

Capecitabine-Temozolomide in Advanced Grade 2 and Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Benefits of Chemotherapy in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Significant 18FDG Uptake

INTRODUCTION

Capecitabine-temozolomide (CAPTEM) chemotherapy, alone or with concurrent peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), has activity in advanced WHO grade 2 and grade 3 neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity of the CAPTEM in patients with grade 2 and grade 3 NENs and identify prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic grade 2 and grade 3 NENs, who were having baseline significant dual uptake on 68Ga-DOTATATE/18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET-CT scan and treated with CAPTEM chemotherapy between January 2014 and December 2019 at Tata Memorial Hospital, was conducted. The clinical variables and survival data were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients received the CAPTEM regimen, of whom 29 patients (43%) received CAPTEM alone and 39 patients (57%) received concurrent PRRT. The primary sites were pancreas in 32 (47%) and small intestine in 12 (18%) patients. Mean Ki-67 index was 12.6% (range: 3-50). Forty-five patients (65%) were treatment naïve. There were no significant differences in baseline clinical variables between patients treated with CAPTEM alone or with CAPTEM-PRRT. Both regimens were well tolerated. With a median follow-up of 22.1 months, the median PFS for the entire cohort was 27.5 months. There was no statistical difference in the median PFS between patients receiving CAPTEM alone or CAPTEM-PRRT (33.7 vs. 22 months; p = 0.199). A Ki-67 index of >5% predicted for inferior PFS on multivariate analysis (24 versus 73.8 months; p = 0.04; hazard ratio -3.77; 95% confidence interval: 1.07-13.26).

CONCLUSION

CAPTEM, alone or concurrent with PRRT, has a significant activity in grade 2 and grade 3 NENs with dual SSTR and 18FDG expression. A Ki-67 index >5% predicts strongly for inferior outcomes and should be further explored as a prognostic cutoff in grade 2 NENs. Early initiation of CAPTEM should be considered in this group of tumors with significant baseline 18FDG expression.

Radiopharmaceuticals for Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors that originate in endocrine tissues throughout the body. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic disease refractory to standard of care treatment. The landmark international phase III NETTER-1 trial led to the approval of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera) in the treatment of somatostatin receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic NETs. Similarly, data from the multicenter, phase II Study IB12B led to the approval of meta-[¹³¹I]Iodo-Benzyl-Guanidine (^I31I-MIBG) for treatment of iobenguane scan-positive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. With the clinical approval of these novel radiopharmaceuticals for managing select patients with NETs, additional studies are needed to refine patient selection, predict and assess therapy response, and optimize radiopharmaceutical delivery and clinical outcomes.

A rare case of a patient with a high grade neuroendocrine tumor developing neutropenic sepsis after receiving PRRT combined with Capecitabine or Temozolomide: A case report

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are rare and demonstrate variable clinical behavior depending on the degree of tumor differentiation. Patients with poorly differentiated tumors (NET G3) have a poor prognosis. Systemic treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy is considered to be the treatment of choice. In patients that are refractory or intolerant to first-line therapy, experts recommend peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in tumors that express somatostatin receptors. Recently, combinations of PRRT and chemotherapy were tested in patients with NET. Available data have reported promising tumor control rates and an excellent toxicity profile in cases where PRRT had been administered with capecitabine/temozolomide, even when administered as salvage therapy. The current study reported an exceptional case of advanced NET G3 with severe toxicity upon receiving PRRT in combination with capecitabine/temozolomide as third line therapy. The patient developed a life-threatening neutropenic fever, fungal pneumonia and necrotizing mastitis 23 days after the first cycle of therapy was administered. However, the treatment led to a significant reduction in tumor size. A total of 5 months after treatment initiation, the patient was alive and in excellent clinical condition with sustained tumor response. In summary, the current study presented a rare case of high grade NET exhibiting an almost complete response to PRRT in combination capecitabine/temozolomide, despite facing unexpected severe toxicity.

Advances in Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine neoplasms make up a heterogeneous group of tumors with inter-patient and intra-patient variabilities. Molecular imaging can help to identify and characterize neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Furthermore, imaging and treatment with novel theranostics agents offers a new, tailored approach to managing NETs. Recent advances in the management of NETs aim to enhance the effectiveness of targeted treatment with either modifications of known substances or the development of new substances with better targeting features. There have been several attempts to increase the detectability of NET lesions via positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and improvements in pretreatment planning using dosimetry. Especially notable is PET imaging with the radionuclide Copper-64. Increasing interest is also being paid to theranostics of grade 3 and purely differentiated NETs, for example, via targeting of the C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4). The aim of this review is to summarize the most relevant recent studies, which present promising new agents in molecular imaging and therapy for NETs, novel combination therapies and new applications of existing molecular imaging modalities in nuclear medicine.

Combination Strategies to Improve Targeted Radionuclide Therapy

In recent years, targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) has emerged as a promising strategy for cancer treatment. In contrast to conventional radiotherapy, TRT delivers ionizing radiation to tumors in a targeted manner, reducing the dose that healthy tissues are exposed to. Existing TRT strategies include the use of 177Lu-DOTATATE, 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine, Bexxar, and Zevalin, clinically approved agents for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors, neuroblastoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, respectively. Although promising results have been obtained with these agents, clinical evidence acquired to date suggests that only a small percentage of patients achieves complete response. Consequently, there have been attempts to improve TRT outcomes through combinations with other therapeutic agents; such strategies include administering concurrent TRT and chemotherapy, and the use of TRT with known or putative radiosensitizers such as poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase and mammalian-target-of-rapamycin inhibitors. In addition to potentially achieving greater therapeutic effects than the respective monotherapies, these strategies may lead to lower dosages or numbers of cycles required and, in turn, reduce unwanted toxicities. As of now, several clinical trials have been conducted to assess the benefits of TRT-based combination therapies, sometimes despite limited preclinical evidence being available in the public domain to support their use. Although some clinical trials have yielded promising results, others have shown no clear survival benefit from particular combination treatments. Here, we present a comprehensive review of combination strategies with TRT reported in the literature to date and evaluate their therapeutic potential.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy as First-Line Systemic Treatment in Advanced Inoperable/Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

PURPOSE

Advanced inoperable/metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) pose a therapeutic challenge with limited treatment options. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), being specific in targeting the somatostatin receptors, is a promising and viable option in this setting. In this study, we intended to evaluate the role of PRRT as the first-line systemic therapy in advanced inoperable/metastatic NETs.

METHODS

Data of consecutive patients of advanced inoperable/metastatic NETs treated with first-line Lu-DOTATATE at our center, from September 2012 to August 2019, were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (median age, 50 years; range, 14-72 years) with treatment-naive advanced NETs received a median cumulative dose of 27 GBq (range, 13.3-41.3 GBq; over 2-7 cycles) Lu-DOTATATE and 1250 mg/m capecitabine from days 0 to 14 of each PRRT cycle. Three patients were lost to follow-up, 2 had nonmeasurable lesions on CT, and hence, radiological response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 could be assessed in 40 patients. Twelve of 40 patients (30%) showed a partial response, whereas stable disease was observed in 22 of 40 patients (55%). Disease progression was limited to 6 of 40 patients (15%). Treatment-related adverse effects were minimal with grade 3/4 anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and hepatotoxicity observed in 2%, 2%, 4%, and 4% of the patients, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 48 months (95% confidence interval, 34.7-61.3 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate the efficacy and safety of first-line PRRT in advanced NETs. Future randomized trials, comparing PRRT and somatostatin analogs in treatment-naive patients, are required to identify the definite sequence of treatment options for these patients.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy as a two-step strategy for initially unresectable liver disease from neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

In this study, we describe our experience with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for initially unresectable liver disease as a two-steps therapeutic strategy, first in neoadjuvant intention before surgery and then later on in case of disease relapse.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective evaluation of four cases of unresectable liver metastases of NET of different origins treated with neoadjuvant Lu-177-DotaTATE for conversion into resectability first and as rechallenging treatment after disease relapse.

RESULTS

After treatment with Lu-177-DotaTAE, resectability was reached in three of four cases. In one case, SIRT was additionally performed preoperatively. Relapse occurred in three of four cases after 32, 34, and 37 months, respectively, and was managed with Re-PRRT-treatment.

CONCLUSION

Although more data are needed, our retrospective study suggests that treatment with Lu-177-DotaTATE is an important adjunct to surgery not only in neoadjuvant intention but also for treating disease relapse. A register study might deliver more evidence for supporting this strategy.

Long-term outcome of "Sandwich" chemo-PRRT: a novel treatment strategy for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors with both FDG- and SSTR-avid aggressive disease

OBJECTIVE

The primary aims of this study were to evaluate the long-term outcome of a "sandwich chemo-PRRT (SCPRRT)" regimen with regard to therapeutic response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with both somatostatin receptor (SSTR)- and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid aggressive disease. Additionally, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scales, clinical toxicity, and association of PFS and disease control rate (DCR) with various variables were also evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 38 patients of the aforementioned cohort, who received SCPRRT (at least 2 cycles of each PRRT and chemotherapy) at our institute between January 2012 and December 2018, were included and analyzed in this retrospective study. Between two cycles of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), two cycles of oral capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) were sandwiched. Therapeutic responses following SCPRRT were assessed by using pre-defined criteria. PFS and OS after first SCPRRT were determined. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) and Karnofsky score were used for evaluation of HRQoL before and after SCPPRT in all 38 patients. Any adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0) of the National Cancer Institute. Associations of PFS and DCR with various variables were evaluated.

RESULTS

Response (complete response and partial response) to SCPRRT was seen in 28 patients (73%), 15 patients (39%), and 16 patients (42%) on symptomatic, biochemical, and molecular imaging response evaluation criteria respectively. A total of 17 patients (45%) had anatomical imaging response with DCR of 84% based upon the RECIST 1.1 criteria. Pre-therapy mean ECOG and KPS was 2.0 and 68, which changed to 1.0 and 75 respectively following SCPRRT. Long-term follow-up data was available and ranged from 12 to 65 months after the first SCPRRT. Median PFS and OS were not reached at a median follow-up of 36 months. An estimated PFS rate of 72.5% and OS rate of 80.4% was found at 36 months. Longer PFS was dependent upon high SSTR uptake and number of CAPTEM cycle (≥ 7 cycles), absence of skeletal metastasis, and no previous external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) exposure with significant P value. Higher DCR was dependent upon absence of skeletal metastasis with significant P value. SCPRRT was tolerated well with none developing grade 4 hematotoxicity and nephrotoxicity of any grade. Anemia (grade 3), thrombocytopenia (grade 3), and leukopenia (grade 3) were noticed in 1 patient (2.5%), 2 patients (5%), and 1 patient (2.5%) respectively in this study.

CONCLUSION

Thus, favorable response rates with effective control of symptoms and longer PFS and OS without high-grade or life-threatening toxicities were important observations in the present study following SCPRRT in NET patients with aggressive, both FDG- and SSTR-avid, metastatic progressive disease. The study results indicate the potential role of "sandwich chemo-PRRT" in future therapeutic algorithms of aggressive, both SSTR- and FDG-positive subset of neuroendocrine tumors.

Somatostatinoma and Neurofibromatosis Type 1-A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Somatostatinomas are rare neuroendocrine tumors (NET) that arise in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Because of their insidious growth, they are usually asymptomatic until late stages, presenting as malignant disease. We report the case of a 50-year-old woman who presented with epigastric abdominal pain, diarrhea and significant weight loss in the last two years. On clinical examination the patient met the criteria for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Abdominal CT and MRI revealed an infiltrative duodenal mass, with pancreatic invasion, locoregional enlarged lymph nodes and disseminated hepatic nodules. Microscopy and immunohistochemistry uncovered a neuroendocrine tumor, staining positive for chromogranin A (CgA), synaptophysin and somatostatin, with a Ki67 = 1%. Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) type 2 were negative and SSTRs type 5 were positive in less than 50% of tumoral cells. Our patient was classified as a T3N1M1 stage IV metastatic duodenal grade 1 somatostatinoma and treatment with somatostatin analogues and chemotherapy with capecitabine and temozolomide was started, with so far abdominal imaging follow-up showing stable disease. When a patient is diagnosed with a rare NET, such as a somatostatinoma, it is of utmost importance to determine if it is a sporadic tumor or just a feature of a genetic disorder.

Enhancing the anti-tumour activity of 177Lu-DOTA-octreotate radionuclide therapy in somatostatin receptor-2 expressing tumour models by targeting PARP

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an important treatment option for patients with somatostatin receptor-2 (SSTR2)-expressing neuroendocrine tumour (NET) though tumour regression occurs in only a minority of patients. Therefore, novel PRRT regimens with improved therapeutic activity are needed. Radiation induced DNA damage repair is an attractive therapeutic target to increase PRRT efficacy and consequently, we have characterised a panel of preclinical models for their SSTR2 expression, in vivo growth properties and response to 177Lu-DOTA-octreotate (LuTate) PRRT to identify models with features suitable for evaluating novel therapeutic combinations. In vitro studies using the SSTR2 expressing AR42J model demonstrate that the combination of LuTate and the small molecule Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP) inhibitor, talazoparib led to increased DNA double strand breaks, as assessed by γ-H2AX foci formation, as compared to LuTate alone. Furthermore, using the AR42J tumour model in vivo we demonstrate that the combination of LuTate and talazoparib significantly improved the anti-tumour efficacy of LuTate alone. These findings support the clinical evaluation of the combination of LuTate and PARP inhibition in SSTR2-expressing NET.

Neoadjuvant Capecitabine/Temozolomide for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

OBJECTIVES

The combination chemotherapy regimen capecitabine/temozolomide (CAPTEM) is efficacious for metastatic well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), but its role in the neoadjuvant setting has not been established.

METHODS

The outcomes of all patients with locally advanced or resectable metastatic PNETs who were treated with neoadjuvant CAPTEM between 2009 and 2017 at 2 high-volume institutions were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with locally advanced PNET (n = 10) or pancreatic neuroendocrine hepatic metastases (n = 20) received neoadjuvant CAPTEM. Thirteen patients (43%) exhibited partial radiographic response (PR), 16 (54%) had stable disease, and 1 (3%) developed progressive disease. Twenty-six (87%) patients underwent resection (pancreatectomy [n = 12], combined pancreatectomy and liver resection [n = 8], or major hepatectomy alone [n = 6]); 3 (18%) declined surgery despite radiographic PR, and 1 (3%) underwent aborted pancreatoduodenectomy. Median primary tumor size was 5.5 cm, and median Ki-67 index was 3.5%. Rates of PR were similar across tumor grades (P = 0.24). At median follow-up of 49 months, median progression-free survival was 28.2 months and 5-year overall survival was 63%.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant CAPTEM is associated with favorable radiographic objective response rates for locally advanced or metastatic PNET and may facilitate selection of patients appropriate for surgical resection.

Prognostic value of a three-scale grading system based on combining molecular imaging with 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias

We investigated on the added prognostic value of a three-scale combined molecular imaging with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, (compared to Ki-67 based histological grading), in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia patients. 85 patients with histologically proven metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias, who underwent combined PET/CT imaging were retrospectively evaluated. Highest Ki-67 value available at time of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was recorded. Patients were classified according to World Health Organization/European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society histological grades (G1, G2, G3) and into three distinct imaging categories (C1: all lesions are ¹⁸F-FDG negative/⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE positive, C2: patients with one or more ¹⁸F-FDG positive lesions, all of them ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE positive, C3: patients with one or more ¹⁸F-FDG positive lesions, at least one of them ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE negative). The primary endpoint of the study was Progression-Free Survival, assessed from the date of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT to the date of radiological progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1. Classification according to histological grade did not show significant statistical difference in median Progression-Free Survival between G1 and G2 but was significant between G2 and G3 patients. In contrast, median Progression-Free Survival was significantly higher in C1 compared to C2 and in C2 compared to C3 patients, revealing three distinctive imaging categories, each with highly distinctive prognosis. Our three-scale combined ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE/¹⁸F-FDG PET imaging classification holds high prognostic value in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias.

Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neuroendocrine tumors are heterogeneous neoplasms with variable prognoses and clinical behaviors. The majority of well differentiated NETs express somatostatin receptors. Identification of these receptors has contributed to advancements in molecular and targeted radiotherapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Molecular scans provide important diagnostic, staging, and prognostic data. Somatostatin-receptor imaging aids in selection of patients who are eligible for somatostatin-receptor-targeting therapies. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has recently demonstrated robust efficacy in a phase III study of progressive midgut NETs. Current studies are investigating novel receptor agonists and antagonists, new classes of radioactive isotopes, and radiosensitizing combination treatments.

SUMMARY

The sophistication of molecular imaging is improving and its importance is increasing as a diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic tool. Theranostics, the coupling of molecular imaging with receptor-targeted therapy, represents a novel approach to cancer treatment.

The HSP90 inhibitor onalespib potentiates 177Lu‑DOTATATE therapy in neuroendocrine tumor cells

¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE was recently approved for the treatment of somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive neuroen-docrine tumors (NETs). However, despite impressive response rates, complete responses are rare. Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitors have been suggested as suitable therapeutic agents for NETs, as well as a potential radiosensitizers. Consequently, the aim of this study was to investigate whether the HSP90-inhibitor onalespib could reduce NET cell growth and act as a radiosensitizer when used in combination with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE. The NET cell lines BON, NCI-H727 and NCI-H460, were first characterized with regards to ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE uptake and sensitivity to onalespib treatment in monolayer cell assays. The growth inhibitory effects of the monotherapies and combination treatments were then examined in three-dimensional multicellular tumor spheroids. Lastly, the molecular effects of the treatments were assessed. ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE uptake was observed in the BON and NCI-H727 cells, while the NCI-H460 cells exhibited no detectable uptake. Accordingly, ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE reduced the growth of BON and NCI-H727 spheroids, while no effect was observed in the NCI-H460 spheroids. Onalespib reduced cell viability and spheroid growth in all three cell lines. Furthermore, the combination of onalespib and ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE exerted synergistic therapeutic effects on the BON and NCI-H727 spheroids. Western blot analysis of BON spheroids revealed the downregulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the upregulation of γ H2A histone family member X (γH2AX) following combined treatment with onalespib and ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE. Moreover, flow cytometric analyses revealed a two-fold increase in caspase 3/7 activity in the combination group. In conclusion, the findings of this study demonstrate that onalespib exerts antitumorigenic effects on NET cells and may thus be a feasible treatment option for NETs. Furthermore, onalespib was able to synergistically potentiate ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE treatment in a SSTR-specific manner. The radiosensitizing mechanisms of onalespib involved the downregulation of EGFR expression and the induction of apoptosis. Consequently, the combination of onalespib and ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE may prove to be a promising strategy with which to improve therapeutic responses in patients with NETs. Further studies investigating this strategy in vivo regarding the therapeutic effects and potential toxicities are warranted to expand these promising findings.

Targeted Systemic Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Current Options and Future Perspectives

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) originate from the neuroendocrine cell system in the bronchial and gastrointestinal tract and can produce hormones leading to distinct clinical syndromes. Systemic treatment of patients with unresectable NETs aims to control symptoms related to hormonal overproduction and tumor growth. In the last decades prognosis has improved as a result of increased detection of early stage disease and the introduction of somatostatin analogs (SSAs) as well as several new therapeutic options. SSAs are the first-line medical treatment of NETs and can control hormonal production and tumor growth. The development of next-generation multireceptor targeted and radiolabelled somatostatin analogs, as well as target-directed therapies (as second-line treatment options) further improve progression-free survival in NET patients. To date, however, a significant prolongation of overall survival with systemic treatment in NET has not been convincingly demonstrated. Several new medical options and treatment combinations will become available in the upcoming years, and although preliminary results of preclinical and clinical trials are encouraging, large, preferrably randomized clinical studies are required to provide definitive evidence of their effect on survival and symptom control.

Systemic treatment for lung carcinoids: from bench to bedside

In the huge spectrum of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms, typical and atypical carcinoids should be considered as a separate biological entity from poorly differentiated forms, harboring peculiar molecular alterations. Despite their indolent behavior, lung carcinoids correlate with a worse survival. To date, only limited therapeutic options are available and novel drugs are strongly needed. In this work, we extensively reviewed scientific literature exploring available therapeutic options, new molecular targets and future perspectives in the management of well differentiated neoplasms of bronchopulmonary tree. Systemic therapy represents the main option in advanced and unresectable disease; accepted choices are somatostatin analogs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, everolimus and chemotherapy. To date, an univocal treatment strategy has not been identified yet, thus tailored therapeutic algorithms should consider treatment efficacy as well as safety profiles. Several molecular alterations found in carcinoid tumors might act as molecular targets leading to development of new therapeutic options. Further studies are necessary to identify new potential “druggable” molecular targets in the selected subset of low-grade lung carcinoids. Furthermore, evaluating the available therapies in more homogeneous population might improve their efficacy through a perfect tailoring of treatment options.