[111In-DTPA]octreotide Tumor Uptake in GEPNET Liver Metastases After Intra-Arterial Administration: An Overview of Preclinical and Clinical Observations and Implications for Tumor Radiation Dose After Peptide Radionuclide Therapy

Intra-arterial peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy for neuro-endocrine tumour liver metastases: an in-patient randomised controlled trial (LUTIA)

PURPOSE

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE has been shown to effectively prolong progression free survival in grade 1-2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET), but is less efficacious in patients with extensive liver metastases. The aim was to investigate whether tumour uptake in liver metastases can be enhanced by intra-arterial administration of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE into the hepatic artery, in order to improve tumour response without increasing toxicity.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with grade 1-2 GEP-NET, and bi-lobar liver metastases were randomized to receive intra-arterial PRRT in the left or right liver lobe for four consecutive cycles. The contralateral liver lobe and extrahepatic disease were treated via a "second-pass" effect and the contralateral lobe was used as the control lobe. Up to three metastases (> 3 cm) per liver lobe were identified as target lesions at baseline on contrast-enhanced CT. The primary endpoint was the tumour-to-non-tumour (T/N) uptake ratio on the 24 h post-treatment [177Lu]Lu-SPECT/CT after the first cycle. This was calculated for each target lesion in both lobes using the mean uptake. T/N ratios in both lobes were compared using paired-samples t-test.

FINDINGS

After the first cycle, a non-significant difference in T/N uptake ratio was observed: T/NIA = 17·4 vs. T/Ncontrol = 16·2 (p = 0·299). The mean increase in T/N was 17% (1·17; 95% CI [1·00; 1·37]). Of all patients, 67% (18/27) showed any increase in T/N ratio after the first cycle.

CONCLUSION

Intra-arterial [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE is safe, but does not lead to a clinically significant increase in tumour uptake.

Impact of administered amount of peptide on tumor dosimetry at the first cycle of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in relation to total tumor somatostatin receptor expression

BACKGROUND

The accumulation of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE might be influenced by the amount of administered peptide in relation to the tumor somatostatin receptor expression. The effect of the administered peptide mass on the resulting absorbed dose in tumors and normal organs has not previously been assessed in relation to the patients' tumor load.

METHOD

Patients with small intestinal (n = 141) and pancreatic (n = 62) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) who underwent PRRT were selected for retrospective evaluation. All patients had received 7.4 GBq ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE, and the amount of administered peptide in the preparation varied from 93 to 456 µg. The absorbed dose in tumors and normal tissue at the first PRRT cycle was calculated, based on SPECT-measurements at day 1, 4, and 7 post-infusion. The total tumor somatostatin receptor expression (tTSSTRE) was calculated on SPECT after 24 h by multiplying the functional tumor volume, delineated by 42% cut-off VOIs of the highest activity, with the SUVmean for the respective tumor VOIs. Spearman's rank correlation analyzed any relationship between the administered amount of peptide and the absorbed dose in tumors and normal organs, in relation to the patients' tTSSTRE.

RESULTS

There was no correlation between the amount of peptide and any of the tested parameters in relation to tTSSTRE.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective analysis, no correlation between the amount of administered peptide in the ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE preparation and the absorbed radiation doses in tumors and normal tissues was demonstrated in relation to the total tumor SSTR expression.

Peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs): a novel trend of research and development on targeted therapy, hype or hope?

Peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs) are the next generation of targeted therapeutics drug after antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), with the core benefits of enhanced cellular permeability and improved drug selectivity. Two drugs are now approved for market by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and in the last two years, the pharmaceutical companies have been developing PDCs as targeted therapeutic candidates for cancer, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), metabolic diseases, and so on. The therapeutic benefits of PDCs are significant, but poor stability, low bioactivity, long research and development time, and slow clinical development process as therapeutic agents of PDC, how can we design PDCs more effectively and what is the future direction of PDCs? This review summarises the components and functions of PDCs for therapeutic, from drug target screening and PDC design improvement strategies to clinical applications to improve the permeability, targeting, and stability of the various components of PDCs. This holds great promise for the future of PDCs, such as bicyclic peptide‒toxin coupling or supramolecular nanostructures for peptide-conjugated drugs. The mode of drug delivery is determined according to the PDC design and current clinical trials are summarised. The way is shown for future PDC development.

Dosimetric analyses of intra-arterial versus standard intravenous administration of 177Lu-DOTATATE in patients of well differentiated neuroendocrine tumor with liver-dominant metastatic disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to perform calculation of the absorbed doses to organs at risk and to neuroendocrine tumors and to determine whether hepatic intra-arterial (IA) injection of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) would achieve higher intratumoral concentrations than standard intravenous administration of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE.

METHODS

29 patients with Grade I-II, inoperable, metastatic gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEPNET) were prospectively identified and enrolled for the study. 15 patients of GEPNETs with liver-dominant metastatic disease and less than 3 sites of extrahepatic metastatic disease were administered a single dose of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE therapy through the selective catheterization of the hepatic artery (IA group). The other 14 patients received a single dose of ¹⁷⁷ Lu- DOTATATE through standard intravenous route (IV group). For dosimetry, whole-body γ (anterior and posterior planar acquisitions) and SPECT/CT scans of the abdomen at 2, 24 and 96 h post ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE administration were acquired. Dosimetric calculations were done using the HERMES software.

RESULTS

The mean dose per unit activity (DpA) in the liver and tumor lesions in the IA group differed significantly (p < 0.05) but differed insignificantly in spleen and kidneys (p > 05) with the IV group. The mean tumor/non-tumor concentration at 96 h was 76.83 ± 7.9 (range 10.2-251.3) in the IA group whereas it was 25.6 ± 5.9 (Range: 12-55) in the IV group. There was an average threefold increase in tumoral concentration over the standard intravenous group.

CONCLUSION

IA administration of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE results in higher concentration and absorbed dose in hepatic metastases in patients of GEPNETs as compared to a single dose of PRRT administered through standard IV route, and thus seems to be a powerful tool to improve the efficacy of PRRT.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Measurement of the dose received by the tumor lesions and the critical organs is of paramount importance for the prognostication of a radionuclide therapy. Scant data exist on the dosimetric impact of IA administration of the therapy with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE on the tumors and other organs, and this study would add an impact towards the better treatment outcome in patients of neuroendocrine tumor with liver-dominant metastatic disease.

Targeted Cancer Therapy: What's New in the Field of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms?

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous family of neoplasms of increasing incidence and high prevalence due to their relatively indolent nature. Their wide anatomic distribution and their characteristic ability to secrete hormonally active substances pose unique challenges for clinical management. They are also characterized by the common expression of somatostatin receptors, a target that has been extremely useful for diagnosis and treatment (i.e., somatostatin analogues (SSAs) and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)). Chemotherapy is of limited use for NETs of non-pancreatic origin, and the only approved targeted agents for advanced progressive NETs are sunitinib for those of pancreatic origin, and everolimus for lung, gastrointestinal and pancreatic primaries. Despite recent therapeutic achievements, thus, systemic treatment options remain limited. In this review we will discuss the state-of-the-art targeted therapies in the field of NETs, and also future perspectives of novel therapeutic drugs or strategies in clinical development, including recently presented results from randomized trials of yet unapproved antiangiogenic agents (i.e., pazopanib, surufatinib and axitinib), PRRT including both approved radiopharmaceuticals (177Lu-Oxodotreotide) and others in development (177Lu-Edotreotide, 177Lu-Satoreotide Tetraxetan), immunotherapy and other innovative targeted strategies (antibody-drug conjugates, bites,…) that shall soon improve the landscape of personalized treatment options in NET patients.

Intraarterial Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Using 90Y-DOTATOC for Hepatic Metastases of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Given the high frequency of liver metastases in neuroendocrine tumor patients, we aimed to determine whether hepatic intraarterial administration of ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) would increase treatment efficacy while reducing systemic toxicity compared with systemic toxicity from intravenous administration as previously reported in the literature. Methods: PRRT-naïve adult neuroendocrine tumor patients with liver-dominant metastases were enrolled in a prospective single-center, open-label pilot study. The patients underwent baseline PET/CT using intravenous ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC. Then, 3.5 ± 0.2 GBq (94.7 ± 5.4 mCi) of ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC were administered into the proper hepatic artery over 30 min. The first 5 patients also received intraarterial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC and underwent PET/CT. All patients were followed for response (RECIST, version 1.1) (primary aim 2, safety) and toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0) (primary aim 1, efficacy) for at least 6 mo, with optional follow-up for up to 1 y. In the subset of 5 patients who underwent both intravenous and intraarterial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, tumor SUV_max was compared between intravenous and intraarterial administration for hepatic tumors, intrahepatic tumors, and uninvolved background organs (secondary aim, intravenous vs. intraarterial uptake). Results: The study was terminated after a planned analysis of the first 10 patients because of lack of efficacy. The best response was stable disease in 90% (9/10 patients) and progressive disease in 10% (1/10 patients) at 3 mo, and stable disease in 8 of 10 patients and progressive disease in 2 of 10 patients at 6 mo. One additional patient developed progressive disease after the 6-mo follow-up period but within the optional 1-y follow-up period. No partial response or complete response was observed. The 2 patients with the highest liver tumor burden died within 6 mo of treatment, with treatment considered a possible contributor. Patients who received intraarterial administration failed to demonstrate higher uptake by hepatic metastases than patients who received intravenous administration, with a median intraarterial-to-intravenous SUV_max ratio of 0.81 (range, 0.36-2.09) on a lesion level. Conclusion: Our study found that administration of PRRT via the proper hepatic artery did not reproduce the increase in hepatic tumor uptake that was previously reported. In addition, the single treatment using ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC did not induce tumor shrinkage, indicating that more treatment cycles may be required. Possible safety concerns in patients with a high liver tumor burden should inform patient selection for future studies.

Intra-arterial versus standard intravenous administration of lutetium-177-DOTA-octreotate in patients with NET liver metastases: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (LUTIA trial)

BACKGROUND

Lutetium-177-DOTA-octreotate (¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE) significantly increases survival and response rates in patients with grade I and grade II neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, survival and response rates are significantly lower in patients with bulky liver metastases. Increasing the tumor-absorbed dose in liver metastases may improve response to ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE. The LUTIA (Lutetium Intra-Arterial) study aims to increase the tumor-absorbed dose in liver metastases by intra-arterial (IA) administration of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE, compared to conventional intravenous (IV) administration.

METHODS

A multicenter, within-patient randomized controlled trial (RCT) in 26 patients with progressive, liver-dominant, unresectable grade I or grade II NET will be conducted. Patients with bilobar bulky disease will be randomly allocated to receive IA treatment into either the left or the right hepatic artery. Using this approach, one liver lobe will be treated intra-arterially (first-pass effect), while the contralateral lobe will receive an intravenous treatment as a second-pass effect. The primary endpoint of this study is the difference in tumor-to-non-tumor ratio of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE uptake between the two liver lobes on post-treatment SPECT/CT (IA versus IV). Secondary endpoints include absorbed dose in both liver lobes, tumor response, dose-response relationship, toxicity, uptake in extrahepatic lesions, and renal uptake.

DISCUSSION

This multicenter, within-patient RCT will investigate whether IA administration of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE results in a higher activity concentration in liver metastases compared to IV administration.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03590119. Registered on 17 July 2018.

Theranostics in Interventional Oncology: Versatile Carriers for Diagnosis and Targeted Image-Guided Minimally Invasive Procedures

We are continuously progressing in our understanding of cancer and other diseases and learned how they can be heterogeneous among patients. Therefore, there is an increasing need for accurate characterization of diseases at the molecular level. In parallel, medical imaging and image-guided therapies are rapidly developing fields with new interventions and procedures entering constantly in clinical practice. Theranostics, a relatively new branch of medicine, refers to procedures combining diagnosis and treatment, often based on patient and disease-specific features or molecular markers. Interventional oncology which is at the convergence point of diagnosis and treatment employs several methods related to theranostics to provide minimally invasive procedures tailored to the patient characteristics. The aim is to develop more personalized procedures able to identify cancer cells, selectively reach and treat them, and to assess drug delivery and uptake in real-time in order to perform adjustments in the treatment being delivered based on obtained procedure feedback and ultimately predict response. Here, we review several interventional oncology procedures referring to the field of theranostics, and describe innovative methods that are under development as well as future directions in the field.

Antitumor Activity of Auger Electron Emitter 111In Delivered by Modular Nanotransporter for Treatment of Bladder Cancer With EGFR Overexpression

Gamma-ray emitting ¹¹¹In, which is extensively used for imaging, is also a source of short-range Auger electrons (AE). While exhibiting negligible effect outside cells, these AE become highly toxic near DNA within the cell nucleus. Therefore, these radionuclides can be used as a therapeutic anticancer agent if delivered precisely into the nuclei of tumor target cells. Modular nanotransporters (MNTs) designed to provide receptor-targeted delivery of short-range therapeutic cargoes into the nuclei of target cells are perspective candidates for specific intracellular delivery of AE emitters. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of ¹¹¹In attached MNTs to kill human bladder cancer cells overexpressing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The cytotoxicity of ¹¹¹In delivered by the EGFR-targeted MNT (¹¹¹In-MNT) was greatly enhanced on EJ-, HT-1376-, and 5637-expressing EGFR bladder cancer cell lines compared with ¹¹¹In non-targeted control. In vivo microSPECT/CT imaging and antitumor efficacy studies revealed prolonged intratumoral retention of ¹¹¹In-MNT with t½ = 4.1 ± 0.5 days as well as significant dose-dependent tumor growth delay (up to 90% growth inhibition) after local infusion of ¹¹¹In-MNT in EJ xenograft-bearing mice.

Additional hepatic 166Ho-radioembolization in patients with neuroendocrine tumours treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE; a single center, interventional, non-randomized, non-comparative, open label, phase II study (HEPAR PLUS trial)

Background

Neuroendocrine tumours (NET) consist of a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with various organs of origin. At diagnosis 21% of the patients with a Grade 1 NET and 30% with a Grade 2 NET have distant metastases. Treatment with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) shows a high objective response rate and long median survival after treatment. However, complete remission is almost never achieved. The liver is the most commonly affected organ in metastatic disease and is the most incriminating factor for patient survival. Additional treatment of liver disease after PRRT may improve outcome in NET patients. Radioembolization is an established therapy for liver metastasis. To investigate this hypothesis, a phase 2 study was initiated to assess effectiveness and toxicity of holmium-166 radioembolization (¹⁶⁶Ho-RE) after PRRT with lutetium-177 (¹⁷⁷Lu)-DOTATATE.

Methods

The HEPAR PLUS trial (“HolmiumEmbolizationParticles forArterialRadiotherapyPlus¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE inSalvage NET patients”) is a single centre, interventional, non-randomized, non-comparative, open label study. In this phase 2 study 30–48 patients with > 3 measurable liver metastases according to RECIST 1.1 will receive additional ¹⁶⁶Ho-RE within 20 weeks after the 4th and last cycle of PRRT with 7.4 GBq ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE. Primary objectives are to assess tumour response, complete and partial response according to RECIST 1.1, and toxicity, based on CTCAE v4.03, 3 months after ¹⁶⁶Ho-RE. Secondary endpoints include biochemical response, quality of life, biodistribution and dosimetry.

Discussion

This is the first prospective study to combine PRRT with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE and additional ¹⁶⁶Ho-RE in metastatic NET. A radiation boost on intrahepatic disease using ¹⁶⁶Ho-RE may lead to an improved response rate without significant additional side-effects.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02067988, 13 February 2014. Protocol version: 6, 30 november 2016.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma Therapeutic Update

OPINION STATEMENT

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine tumor of the skin. Early-stage disease can be cured with surgical resection and radiotherapy (RT). Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an important staging tool, as a microscopic MCC is frequently identified. Adjuvant RT to the primary excision site and regional lymph node bed may improve locoregional control. However, newer studies confirm that patients with biopsy-negative sentinel lymph nodes may not benefit from regional RT. Advanced MCC currently lacks a highly effective treatment as responses to chemotherapy are not durable. Recent work suggests that immunotherapy targeting the programmed cell death receptor 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) checkpoint holds great promise in treating advanced MCC and may provide durable responses in a portion of patients. At the same time, high-throughput sequencing studies have demonstrated significant differences in the mutational profiles of tumors with and without the Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCV). An important secondary endpoint in the ongoing immunotherapy trials for MCC will be determining if there is a response difference between the virus-positive MCC tumors that typically lack a large mutational burden and the virus-negative tumors that have a large number of somatic mutations and predicted tumor neoantigens. Interestingly, sequencing studies have failed to identify a highly recurrent activated driver pathway in the majority of MCC tumors. This may explain why targeted therapies can demonstrate exceptional responses in case reports but fail when treating all comers with MCC. Ultimately, a precision medicine approach may be more appropriate for treating MCC, where identified driver mutations are used to direct targeted therapies. At a minimum, stratifying patients in future clinical trials based on tumor viral status should be considered as virus-negative tumors are more likely to harbor activating driver mutations.

ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogues

The purpose of these guidelines is to assist physicians caring for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasia in considering eligibility criteria for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and in defining the minimum requirements for PRRT. It is not these guidelines' aim to give recommendations on the use of specific radiolabelled somatostatin analogues for PRRT as different analogues are being used, and their availability is governed by varying international regulations. However, a recent randomized controlled trial, NETTER-1, has provided evidence that may establish ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-octreotate (LutaThera®) as the first widely approved agent. It also makes recommendations on what minimal patient, tumour, and treatment outcome characteristics should be reported for PRRT to facilitate robust comparisons between studies.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a promising new treatment modality for inoperable or metastasized gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors patients. Most studies report objective response rates in 15% to 35% of patients. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compare favorably with that for somatostatin analogues, chemotherapy, or newer, "targeted" therapies. Prospective, randomized data regarding the potential PFS and OS benefit of PRRT compared with standard therapies is anticipated.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: focus on bronchial neuroendocrine tumors

Well-differentiated bronchial neuroendocrine tumors (B-NETs) are rare. They represent 1-5 % of all lung cancers. The incidence of these neoplasms has risen over the past 30 years and, especially for advanced or metastatic disease, management is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Treatment with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) is the most important first-line therapy, in particular in well-differentiated NETs with high somatostatin type receptor (SSTR) expression. In these tumors, the role of mammalian target of rapamycin (m-TOR) inhibitors and the potential utility of other target therapies remain unclear while chemotherapy represents the gold standard treatment only for aggressive forms with low SSTR expression. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an emerging treatment modality for advanced NETs. There are many cumulative evidences about the effectiveness and tolerability of this therapeutic approach, especially in gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP)-NETs. For B-NETs, scientific research is moving more slowly. Here, we performed a review in order to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of PRRT with a focus on patients with inoperable or metastatic well-differentiated B-NETs.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumours

In the past decades, the number of neuroendocrine tumours that are detected is increasing. A relative new and promising therapy for patients with metastasised or inoperable disease is peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). This therapy involves an infusion of somatostatin analogues linked to radionuclides like Yttrium-90 or Lutetium-177. Objective response rates are reported in 15-35%. Response rates may vary between type of tumour and radionuclide. Besides the objective response rate, overall survival and progression free survival increase significantly. Also, the quality of life improves as well. Serious side-affects are rare. PRRT is usually well tolerated, also in patients with extensive metastasised disease. Recent studies combined PRRT with other types of therapies. Unfortunately no randomised trials comparing these strategies are available. In the future, more research is needed to evaluate the best therapy combinations or sequence of therapies.