1
|
de Jong LA, Li X, Emamipour S, van der Werf S, Postma MJ, van Dijk PR, Feenstra TL. Evaluating the Cost-Utility of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of the Methods and Quality of Studies Using Decision Models or Empirical Data. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024:10.1007/s40273-024-01388-6. [PMID: 38904911 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01388-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This review presents a critical appraisal of differences in the methodologies and quality of model-based and empirical data-based cost-utility studies on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in type 1 diabetes (T1D) populations. It identifies key limitations and challenges in health economic evaluations on CGM and opportunities for their improvement. METHODS The review and its documentation adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews. Searches for articles published between January 2000 and January 2023 were conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Econlit databases. Published studies using models and empirical data to evaluate the cost utility of all CGM devices used by T1D patients were included in the search. Two authors independently extracted data on interventions, populations, model settings (e.g., perspectives and time horizons), model types and structures, clinical outcomes used to populate the model, validation, and uncertainty analyses. They subsequently met to confirm consensus. Quality was assessed using the Philips checklist for model-based studies and the Consensus Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) checklist for empirical studies. Model validation was assessed using the Assessment of the Validation Status of Health-Economic decision models (AdViSHE) checklist. The extracted data were used to generate summary tables and figures. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023391284). RESULTS In total, 34 studies satisfied the selection criteria, two of which only used empirical data. The remaining 32 studies applied 10 different models, with a substantial majority adopting the CORE Diabetes Model. Model-based studies often lacked transparency, as their assumptions regarding the extrapolation of treatment effects beyond available evidence from clinical studies and the selection and processing of the input data were not explicitly stated. Initial scores for disagreements concerning checklists were relatively high, especially for the Philips checklist. Following their resolution, overall quality scores were moderate at 56%, whereas model validation scores were mixed. Strikingly, costing approaches differed widely across studies, resulting in little consistency in the elements included in intervention costs. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The overall quality of studies evaluating CGM was moderate. Potential areas of improvement include developing systematic approaches for data selection, improving uncertainty analyses, clearer reporting, and explaining choices for particular modeling approaches. Few studies provided the assurance that all relevant and feasible options had been compared, which is required by decision makers, especially for rapidly evolving technologies such as CGM and insulin administration. High scores for disagreements indicated that several checklists contained questions that were difficult to interpret consistently for quality assessment. Therefore, simpler but comprehensive quality checklists may be needed for model-based health economic evaluation studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa A de Jong
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Xinyu Li
- Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy (GRIP), Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sajad Emamipour
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoukje van der Werf
- Central Medical Library, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten J Postma
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Center of Excellence for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Peter R van Dijk
- Department of Endocrinology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetes Center, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Talitha L Feenstra
- Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy (GRIP), Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fox DS, Ware J, Boughton CK, Allen JM, Wilinska ME, Tauschmann M, Denvir L, Thankamony A, Campbell F, Wadwa RP, Buckingham BA, Davis N, DiMeglio LA, Mauras N, Besser REJ, Ghatak A, Weinzimer SA, Kanapka L, Kollman C, Sibayan J, Beck RW, Hood KK, Hovorka R. Cost-Effectiveness of Closed-Loop Automated Insulin Delivery Using the Cambridge Hybrid Algorithm in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: Results from a Multicenter 6-Month Randomized Trial. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024:19322968241231950. [PMID: 38494876 DOI: 10.1177/19322968241231950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE The main objective of this study is to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) of the Cambridge hybrid closed-loop automated insulin delivery (AID) algorithm versus usual care for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS This multicenter, binational, parallel-controlled trial randomized 133 insulin pump using participants aged 6 to 18 years to either AID (n = 65) or usual care (n = 68) for 6 months. Both within-trial and lifetime cost-effectiveness were analyzed. Analysis focused on the treatment subgroup (n = 21) who received the much more reliable CamAPS FX hardware iteration and their contemporaneous control group (n = 24). Lifetime complications and costs were simulated via an updated Sheffield T1D policy model. RESULTS Within-trial, both groups had indistinguishable and statistically unchanged health-related quality of life, and statistically similar hypoglycemia, severe hypoglycemia, and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) event rates. Total health care utilization was higher in the treatment group. Both the overall treatment group and CamAPS FX subgroup exhibited improved HbA1C (-0.32%, 95% CI: -0.59 to -0.04; P = .02, and -1.05%, 95% CI: -1.43 to -0.67; P < .001, respectively). Modeling projected increased expected lifespan of 5.36 years and discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 1.16 (U.K. tariffs) and 1.52 (U.S. tariffs) in the CamAPS FX subgroup. Estimated ICERs for the subgroup were £19 324/QALY (United Kingdom) and -$3917/QALY (United States). For subgroup patients already using continuous glucose monitors (CGM), ICERs were £10 096/QALY (United Kingdom) and -$33 616/QALY (United States). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis generated mean ICERs of £19 342/QALY (95% CI: £15 903/QALY to £22 929/QALY) (United Kingdom) and -$28 283/QALY (95% CI: -$59 607/QALY to $1858/QALY) (United States). CONCLUSIONS For children and adolescents with T1D on insulin pump therapy, AID using the Cambridge algorithm appears cost-effective below a £20 000/QALY threshold (United Kingdom) and cost saving (United States).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Steven Fox
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Health Economics, Mann School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Julia Ware
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Charlotte K Boughton
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Janet M Allen
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Malgorzata E Wilinska
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Martin Tauschmann
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Louise Denvir
- Department of Paediatric Diabetes and Endocrinology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ajay Thankamony
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fiona Campbell
- Department of Paediatric Diabetes, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - R Paul Wadwa
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Bruce A Buckingham
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Nikki Davis
- Department of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Southampton Children's Hospital, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Linda A DiMeglio
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Pediatrics, Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Nelly Mauras
- Nemours Children's Health, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Rachel E J Besser
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Judy Sibayan
- The Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Roy W Beck
- The Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Korey K Hood
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Health Economics, Mann School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mathieu C, Ahmed W, Gillard P, Cohen O, Vigersky R, de Portu S, Ozdemir Saltik AZ. The Health Economics of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems and the Potential Use of Time in Range in Diabetes Modeling: A Narrative Review. Diabetes Technol Ther 2024; 26:66-75. [PMID: 38377319 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
Intensive therapy with exogenous insulin is the treatment of choice for individuals living with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and some with type 2 diabetes, alongside regular glucose monitoring. The development of systems allowing (semi-)automated insulin delivery (AID), by connecting glucose sensors with insulin pumps and algorithms, has revolutionized insulin therapy. Indeed, AID systems have demonstrated a proven impact on overall glucose control, as indicated by effects on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), risk of severe hypoglycemia, and quality of life measures. An alternative endpoint for glucose control that has arisen from the use of sensor-based continuous glucose monitoring is the time in range (TIR) measure, which offers an indication of overall glucose control, while adding information on the quality of control with regard to blood glucose level stability. A review of literature on the health-economic value of AID systems was conducted, with a focus placed on the growing place of TIR as an endpoint in studies involving AID systems. Results showed that the majority of economic evaluations of AID systems focused on individuals with T1D and found AID systems to be cost-effective. Most studies incorporated HbA1c, rather than TIR, as a clinical endpoint to determine treatment effects on glucose control and subsequent quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains. Likely reasons for the choice of HbA1c as the chosen endpoint is the use of this metric in most validated and established economic models, as well as the limited publicly available evidence on appropriate methodologies for TIR data incorporation within conventional economic evaluations. Future studies could include the novel TIR metric in health-economic evaluations as an additional measure of treatment effects and subsequent QALY gains, to facilitate a holistic representation of the impact of AID systems on glycemic control. This would provide decision makers with robust evidence to inform future recommendations for health care interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal Mathieu
- Department of Endocrinology, UZ Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Waqas Ahmed
- Covalence Research Ltd, Harpenden, United Kingdom
| | - Pieter Gillard
- Department of Endocrinology, UZ Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ohad Cohen
- Medtronic International Trading Sarl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland
| | | | - Simona de Portu
- Medtronic International Trading Sarl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lingen K, Maahs D, Bellini N, Isaacs D. Removing Barriers, Bridging the Gap, and the Changing Role of the Health Care Professional with Automated Insulin Delivery Systems. Diabetes Technol Ther 2024; 26:45-52. [PMID: 38377318 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
As all people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and some with type 2 diabetes (T2D) require insulin, there is a need to develop management methods that not only achieve glycemic targets but also reduce the burden of living with diabetes. After insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitors, the next step in the evolution of diabetes technology is automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, which have transformed intensive insulin management over the past decade, as these systems address the shortcomings of previous management options. However, AID use remains fairly limited, and access represents a major barrier to use for many people with diabetes, despite these systems being standard of care. Therefore, the future of AID will necessitate addressing barriers related to social determinants of health, finances, and an expansion of the number and type of health care professionals (HCPs) prescribing AID systems. These crucial steps will be essential to ensure that everyone with intensively managed diabetes can use AID systems. The impact of implementing these changes will create a shift in the future of diabetes care that will result in achievement of more targeted glycemia and psychosocial outcomes for all people with diabetes and an expansion of the role of all HCPs in AID-related diabetes care. Even more importantly, by addressing social determinants of health and clinical inertia related to AID, the field can address disparities in outcomes across countries, race, gender, socioeconomic status, and insurance status. Furthermore, the increased use of AID system will provide more time during appointments for a shift in the discussion away from fine tuning insulin dosing and toward a focus on more topics related to behavior and conversations about general health. This will include psychosocial outcomes, and quality of life. In addition, these changes can hopefully allow for time to discuss more general issues, such as cardiovascular health, obesity prevention, diabetes-related complications, and other health-related concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Maahs
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Lucille Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Natalie Bellini
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Diana Isaacs
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schoemaker M, Martensson A, Mader JK, Nørgaard K, Freckmann G, Benhamou PY, Diem P, Heinemann L. Combining Glucose Monitoring and Insulin Infusion in an Integrated Device: A Narrative Review of Challenges and Proposed Solutions. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023:19322968231203237. [PMID: 37798963 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231203237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
The introduction of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems has enabled increasing numbers of individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) to improve their glycemic control largely. However, use of AID systems is limited due to their complexity and costs associated. The user must wear both a continuously monitoring glucose system and an insulin infusion pump. The glucose sensor and the insulin catheter must be inserted at two different body sites using different insertion devices. In addition, the user must pair and manage the different systems. These communicate with the AID software implemented on the pump or on a third device such as a dedicated display device or smart phone application. These components might be developed and commercialized by different manufacturers, which in turn can cause difficulties for patients seeking technical support. A possible solution to these challenges would be to integrate the glucose sensor and insulin catheter into a single device. This would allow the glucose sensor and insulin catheter to be inserted simultaneously, eliminating the need for pairing, and simplifying system management. In recent years, different technologies have been developed and evaluated in clinical investigations that combine the glucose sensor and the insulin catheter in one platform. The consistent finding of all these studies is that integration has no adverse effect on insulin infusion and glucose measurements provided that certain conditions are met. In this review, we discuss the perceived challenges of such an approach and discuss possible solutions that have been proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Kirsten Nørgaard
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Guido Freckmann
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Pierre-Yves Benhamou
- Department of Endocrinology, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - Peter Diem
- Artificial Intelligence in Health and Nutrition, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lutz Heinemann
- Science-Consulting in Diabetes GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cardona-Hernandez R, Dôvc K, Biester T, Ekhlaspour L, Macedoni M, Tauschmann M, Mameli C. New therapies towards a better glycemic control in youths with type 1 diabetes. Pharmacol Res 2023; 195:106882. [PMID: 37543096 PMCID: PMC11073821 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is the most frequent form of diabetes in pediatric age, affecting more than 1.5 million people younger than age 20 years worldwide. Early and intensive control of diabetes provides continued protection against both microvascular and macrovascular complications, enhances growth, and ensures normal pubertal development. In the absence of definitive reversal therapy for this disease, achieving and maintaining the recommended glycemic targets is crucial. In the last 30 years, enormous progress has been made using technology to better treat T1D. In spite of this progress, the majority of children, adolescents and young adults do not reach the recommended targets for glycemic control and assume a considerable burden each day. The development of promising new therapeutic advances, such as more physiologic insulin analogues, pioneering diabetes technology including continuous glucose monitoring and closed loop systems as well as new adjuvant drugs, anticipate a new paradigm in T1D management over the next few years. This review presents insights into current management of T1D in youths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Klemen Dôvc
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Torben Biester
- AUF DER BULT, Diabetes Center for Children and Adolescents, Hannover, Germany
| | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology. University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | | | - Martin Tauschmann
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Chiara Mameli
- Department of Pediatrics, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Low-dose nano-gel incorporated with bile acids enhanced pharmacology of surgical implants. Ther Deliv 2023; 14:17-29. [PMID: 36919692 DOI: 10.4155/tde-2022-0037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: Major challenges to islet transplantation in Type 1 diabetes include host-inflammation, which results in failure to maintain survival and functions of transplanted islets. Therefore, this study investigated the applications of encapsulating the bile acid ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) with transplanted islets within improved nano-gel systems for Type 1 diabetes treatment. Materials & methods: Islets were harvested from healthy mice, encapsulated using UDCA-nano gel and transplanted into the diabetic mice, while the control group was transplanted encapsulated islets without UDCA. The two groups' survival plot, blood glucose, and inflammation and bile acid profiles were analyzed. Results & conclusion: UDCA-nano gel enhanced survival, glycemia and normalized bile acids' profile, which suggests improved islets functions and potential adjunct treatment for insulin therapy.
Collapse
|
8
|
Phillip M, Nimri R, Bergenstal RM, Barnard-Kelly K, Danne T, Hovorka R, Kovatchev BP, Messer LH, Parkin CG, Ambler-Osborn L, Amiel SA, Bally L, Beck RW, Biester S, Biester T, Blanchette JE, Bosi E, Boughton CK, Breton MD, Brown SA, Buckingham BA, Cai A, Carlson AL, Castle JR, Choudhary P, Close KL, Cobelli C, Criego AB, Davis E, de Beaufort C, de Bock MI, DeSalvo DJ, DeVries JH, Dovc K, Doyle FJ, Ekhlaspour L, Shvalb NF, Forlenza GP, Gallen G, Garg SK, Gershenoff DC, Gonder-Frederick LA, Haidar A, Hartnell S, Heinemann L, Heller S, Hirsch IB, Hood KK, Isaacs D, Klonoff DC, Kordonouri O, Kowalski A, Laffel L, Lawton J, Lal RA, Leelarathna L, Maahs DM, Murphy HR, Nørgaard K, O’Neal D, Oser S, Oser T, Renard E, Riddell MC, Rodbard D, Russell SJ, Schatz DA, Shah VN, Sherr JL, Simonson GD, Wadwa RP, Ward C, Weinzimer SA, Wilmot EG, Battelino T. Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice. Endocr Rev 2023; 44:254-280. [PMID: 36066457 PMCID: PMC9985411 DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnac022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 100.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The significant and growing global prevalence of diabetes continues to challenge people with diabetes (PwD), healthcare providers, and payers. While maintaining near-normal glucose levels has been shown to prevent or delay the progression of the long-term complications of diabetes, a significant proportion of PwD are not attaining their glycemic goals. During the past 6 years, we have seen tremendous advances in automated insulin delivery (AID) technologies. Numerous randomized controlled trials and real-world studies have shown that the use of AID systems is safe and effective in helping PwD achieve their long-term glycemic goals while reducing hypoglycemia risk. Thus, AID systems have recently become an integral part of diabetes management. However, recommendations for using AID systems in clinical settings have been lacking. Such guided recommendations are critical for AID success and acceptance. All clinicians working with PwD need to become familiar with the available systems in order to eliminate disparities in diabetes quality of care. This report provides much-needed guidance for clinicians who are interested in utilizing AIDs and presents a comprehensive listing of the evidence payers should consider when determining eligibility criteria for AID insurance coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moshe Phillip
- The Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, 49202 Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sacker Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 39040 Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Revital Nimri
- The Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, 49202 Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sacker Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 39040 Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Richard M Bergenstal
- International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN 55416, USA
| | | | - Thomas Danne
- AUF DER BULT, Diabetes-Center for Children and Adolescents, Endocrinology and General Paediatrics, Hannover, Germany
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Boris P Kovatchev
- Center for Diabetes Technology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Laurel H Messer
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver—Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | | | | | | | - Lia Bally
- Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation, Inc., Tampa, FL 33647, USA
| | - Sarah Biester
- AUF DER BULT, Diabetes-Center for Children and Adolescents, Endocrinology and General Paediatrics, Hannover, Germany
| | - Torben Biester
- AUF DER BULT, Diabetes-Center for Children and Adolescents, Endocrinology and General Paediatrics, Hannover, Germany
| | - Julia E Blanchette
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
- Center for Diabetes and Obesity, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Emanuele Bosi
- Diabetes Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and San Raffaele Vita Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Charlotte K Boughton
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marc D Breton
- Center for Diabetes Technology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Sue A Brown
- Center for Diabetes Technology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
- Division of Endocrinology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Bruce A Buckingham
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Albert Cai
- The diaTribe Foundation/Close Concerns, San Diego, CA 94117, USA
| | - Anders L Carlson
- International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN 55416, USA
| | - Jessica R Castle
- Harold Schnitzer Diabetes Health Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Pratik Choudhary
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Kelly L Close
- The diaTribe Foundation/Close Concerns, San Diego, CA 94117, USA
| | - Claudio Cobelli
- Department of Woman and Child’s Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Amy B Criego
- International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN 55416, USA
| | - Elizabeth Davis
- Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth Children’s Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Carine de Beaufort
- Diabetes & Endocrine Care Clinique Pédiatrique DECCP/Centre Hospitalier Luxembourg, and Faculty of Sciences, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch sur Alzette, GD Luxembourg/Department of Paediatrics, UZ-VUB, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Martin I de Bock
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Daniel J DeSalvo
- Division of Pediatric Diabetes and Endocrinology, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX 77598, USA
| | - J Hans DeVries
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Klemen Dovc
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, UMC - University Children’s Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Francis J Doyle
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital—Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Naama Fisch Shvalb
- The Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, 49202 Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Gregory P Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver—Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | | | - Satish K Garg
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver—Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Dana C Gershenoff
- International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN 55416, USA
| | - Linda A Gonder-Frederick
- Center for Diabetes Technology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Ahmad Haidar
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Sara Hartnell
- Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Simon Heller
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Irl B Hirsch
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington Diabetes Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Korey K Hood
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Diana Isaacs
- Cleveland Clinic, Endocrinology and Metabolism Institute, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - David C Klonoff
- Diabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA 94010, USA
| | - Olga Kordonouri
- AUF DER BULT, Diabetes-Center for Children and Adolescents, Endocrinology and General Paediatrics, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Lori Laffel
- Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Julia Lawton
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rayhan A Lal
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Lalantha Leelarathna
- Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust/University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David M Maahs
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Helen R Murphy
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Kirsten Nørgaard
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - David O’Neal
- Department of Medicine and Department of Endocrinology, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sean Oser
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Tamara Oser
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Eric Renard
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition, Montpellier University Hospital, and Institute of Functional Genomics, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France
| | - Michael C Riddell
- School of Kinesiology & Health Science, Muscle Health Research Centre, York University, Toronto, Canada
| | - David Rodbard
- Biomedical Informatics Consultants LLC, Potomac, MD, USA
| | - Steven J Russell
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Desmond A Schatz
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Diabetes Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 02114, USA
| | - Viral N Shah
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver—Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Jennifer L Sherr
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, Pediatric Endocrinology, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Gregg D Simonson
- International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN 55416, USA
| | - R Paul Wadwa
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver—Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Candice Ward
- Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stuart A Weinzimer
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, Pediatric Endocrinology, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Emma G Wilmot
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Trust, Derby, UK
- Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England, UK
| | - Tadej Battelino
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, UMC - University Children’s Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Brilhante RRDC, Moreira TMM, Oliveira SKPD, Florêncio RS, Pessoa VLMDP, Cestari VRF. Serial album on Continuous Insulin Infusion System as an innovative educational technology in diabetes. Rev Bras Enferm 2022; 75:e20210277. [PMID: 36259875 DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to build and validate a serial album content and appearance on insulin therapy using a Continuous Infusion System. METHOD a methodological study, carried out in three stages in Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, from August to November 2018. The serial album construction and content and appearance validity were carried out by experts, and assessment, by the target audience. Content Validity Index and Concordance Index were calculated. RESULTS the judges considered the serial album content and appearance to be valid, which means that the material is suitable as an educational technology. Experts suggested adjustments, incorporated into the material for print production of the final version. The target audience also assessed the serial album positively. CONCLUSION we realized that the serial album was considered an innovative educational technology in diabetes, valuable for promoting knowledge about Continuous Insulin Infusion System, with rich, updated content, combined with clarity, suitable format and explanatory illustrations.
Collapse
|
10
|
Jiao Y, Lin R, Hua X, Churilov L, Gaca MJ, James S, Clarke PM, O'Neal D, Ekinci EI. A systematic review: Cost-effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 1 diabetes. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab 2022; 5:e369. [PMID: 36112608 PMCID: PMC9659662 DOI: 10.1002/edm2.369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is rapidly becoming a vital tool in the management of type 1 diabetes. Its use has been shown to improve glycaemic management and reduce the risk of hypoglycaemic events. The cost of CGM remains a barrier to its widespread application. We aimed to identify and synthesize evidence about the cost-effectiveness of utilizing CGM in patients with type 1 diabetes. Studies were identified from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library from January 2010 to February 2022. Those that assessed the cost-effectiveness of CGM compared to self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) in patients with type 1 diabetes and reported lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were included. Studies on critically ill or pregnant patients were excluded. Nineteen studies were identified. Most studies compared continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and SMBG to a sensor-augmented pump (SAP). The estimated ICER range was [$18,734-$99,941] and the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain range was [0.76-2.99]. Use in patients with suboptimal management or greater hypoglycaemic risk revealed more homogenous results and lower ICERs. Limited studies assessed CGM in the context of multiple daily injections (MDI) (n = 4), MDI and SMBG versus SAP (n = 2) and three studies included hybrid closed-loop systems. Most studies (n = 17) concluded that CGM is a cost-effective tool. This systematic review suggests that CGM appears to be a cost-effective tool for individuals with type 1 diabetes. Cost-effectiveness is driven by reducing short- and long-term complications. Use in patients with suboptimal management or at risk of severe hypoglycaemia is most cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxin Jiao
- Austin HealthHeidelbergVictoriaAustralia
| | - Rose Lin
- Austin HealthHeidelbergVictoriaAustralia
| | - Xinyang Hua
- Centre for Health PolicyMelbourne School of Population and Global HealthUniversity of MelbourneCarltonVictoriaAustralia
| | - Leonid Churilov
- Melbourne Medical SchoolThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Michele J. Gaca
- Health Sciences LibraryAustin HealthHeidelbergVictoriaAustralia
| | - Steven James
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and ParamedicineUniversity of the Sunshine CoastPetrieQueenslandAustralia
| | - Philip M. Clarke
- Health Economics Research CentreNuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - David O'Neal
- Department of MedicineSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne Medical School, The University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Elif I. Ekinci
- Department of Medicine, Austin HealthMelbourne Medical School, The University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia,Department of EndocrinologyAustin HealthHeidelbergVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pease A, Callander E, Zomer E, Abraham MB, Davis EA, Jones TW, Liew D, Zoungas S. The Cost of Control: Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Hybrid Closed-Loop Therapy in Youth. Diabetes Care 2022; 45:1971-1980. [PMID: 35775453 DOI: 10.2337/dc21-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hybrid closed-loop (HCL) therapy is an efficacious management strategy for young people with type 1 diabetes. However, high costs prevent equitable access. We thus sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HCL therapy compared with current care among young people with type 1 diabetes in Australia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A patient-level Markov model was constructed to simulate disease progression for young people with type 1 diabetes using HCL therapy versus current care, with follow-up from 12 until 25 years of age. Downstream health and economic consequences were compared via decision analysis. Treatment effects and proportions using different technologies to define "current care" were based primarily on data from an Australian pediatric randomized controlled trial. Transition probabilities and utilities for health states were sourced from published studies. Costs were considered from the Australian health care system's perspective. An annual discount rate of 5% was applied to future costs and outcomes. Uncertainty was evaluated with probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS Use of HCL therapy resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Australian dollars (AUD) $32,789 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. The majority of simulations (93.3%) were below the commonly accepted willingness-to-pay threshold of AUD $50,000 per QALY gained in Australia. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the base-case results were robust. CONCLUSIONS In this first cost-effectiveness analysis of HCL technologies for the management of young people with type 1 diabetes, HCL therapy was found to be cost-effective compared with current care in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Pease
- School Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emily Callander
- School Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ella Zomer
- School Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mary B Abraham
- Children's Diabetes Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Division of Paediatrics, within the Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Elizabeth A Davis
- Children's Diabetes Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Division of Paediatrics, within the Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Timothy W Jones
- Children's Diabetes Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Division of Paediatrics, within the Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Danny Liew
- School Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sophia Zoungas
- School Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pintaudi B, Gironi I, Nicosia R, Meneghini E, Disoteo O, Mion E, Bertuzzi F. Minimed Medtronic 780G optimizes glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2022; 32:1719-1724. [PMID: 35599092 DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2022.03.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The new advanced hybrid closed loop insulin infusion systems have the potential to significantly improve glycaemic control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Minimed 780G system in 59 patients with type 1 diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS Glucose control obtained by using the system in automatic mode at 1-2 months of activation, at 2-4 months, at 4-6 months, and beyond 6 month was compared with those obtained with the system in manual mode. A significant improvement in time-in-range and in time-above-range throughout the follow-up was observed, as well as a significant reduction in time-below-range (<54 mg/dl) after 6 months, a significant reduction of the glucose variability and of HbA1c. After switching the mode, all target percentages lied on the average within the recommended ranges by literature consensus and no severe hypoglycemia nor ketoacidosis episodes were recorded. CONCLUSION The Minimed 780G allowed a rapid and progressive improvement of the overall glucose control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Basilio Pintaudi
- SC Diabetologia, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Gironi
- SC Diabetologia, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Nicosia
- SC Diabetologia, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Meneghini
- SC Diabetologia, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Olga Disoteo
- SC Diabetologia, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Mion
- SC Diabetologia, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Bertuzzi
- SC Diabetologia, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Serné EH, Roze S, Buompensiere MI, Valentine WJ, De Portu S, de Valk HW. Cost-Effectiveness of Hybrid Closed Loop Insulin Pumps Versus Multiple Daily Injections Plus Intermittently Scanned Glucose Monitoring in People With Type 1 Diabetes in The Netherlands. Adv Ther 2022; 39:1844-1856. [PMID: 35226346 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02058-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hybrid closed loop (HCL) insulin pump systems and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (IS-CGM) are increasingly used by individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D). The aim of the analysis was to compare the long-term cost-effectiveness of the MiniMed 670G HCL system versus IS-CGM plus multiple daily injections of insulin (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in adults with T1D in the Netherlands. METHODS The analysis was performed using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model with clinical input data sourced from observational studies. Simulated patients were assumed to have a baseline HbA1c of 7.8%. Use of the MiniMed 670G system was assumed to reduce HbA1c by 0.4% and confer a quality-of-life (QoL) benefit through reduced fear of hypoglycemia (FoH). The analysis was performed from a societal perspective over a lifetime time horizon; future costs and clinical outcomes pertaining to the Netherlands were used and discounted at 4% and 1.5% per annum, respectively. RESULTS Use of the MiniMed 670G HCL system was projected to improve mean quality-adjusted life expectancy by 2.231 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus IS-CGM. Total mean lifetime costs were EUR 13,683 higher with the MiniMed 670G system resulting in an ICER of EUR 6133 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses revealed findings to be sensitive to changes in assumptions around severe hypoglycemic event rates and the (QoL) benefit associated with reduced FoH. CONCLUSIONS Over patient lifetimes, for adults with long-standing T1D in the Netherlands, use of the MiniMed 670G system is projected to be cost-effective versus IS-CGM plus MDI or CSII.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - William J Valentine
- Ossian Health Economics and Communications GmbH, Bäumleingasse 20, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Simona De Portu
- Medtronic International Trading Sàrl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
de Portu S, Vorrink L, Re R, Shin J, Castaneda J, Habteab A, Cohen O. Randomised controlled trial of Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop in an Adult Population with Type 1 Diabetes (ADAPT): study protocol and rationale. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e050635. [PMID: 35110310 PMCID: PMC8811581 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For many people with type 1 diabetes who struggle to achieve glycaemic control with multiple daily injections of insulin (MDI) plus self-monitoring of blood glucose, MDI plus intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (IS-CGM) or real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM), or insulin administration using insulin pump therapy represent optimised care in many regions. Through technological advances an advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) system has been developed; studies of incremental effects relative to MDI plus IS-CGM are lacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop study in Adult Population with Type 1 Diabetes (ADAPT) study is a multinational, prospective, open-label, confirmatory and exploratory randomised controlled trial to examine outcomes with the MiniMed 670G version 4.0 AHCL system (with an equivalent algorithm and commercialised as the MiniMed 780G system, referred to as AHCL) relative to MDI plus IS-CGM in adults with baseline HbA1c≥8.0%. An exploratory cohort will compare AHCL with MDI plus RT-CGM. The study will be conducted in approximately 124 adults on MDI plus either IS-CGM or RT-CGM for at least 3 months prior to screening. The primary endpoint will be the difference in mean HbA1c change from baseline to 6 months between the AHCL and the MDI plus IS-CGM arms. Secondary endpoints will include proportion of time spent in hypoglycaemic, euglycaemic and hyperglycaemic ranges. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The ADAPT study will be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki and local laws and regulations, and has been approved by ethics committees. The trial will provide valuable information on the incremental benefits that may be provided by AHCL for patients failing to achieve glycaemic targets on MDI plus IS-CGM or RT-CGM and form a basis for health economic evaluations to support market access. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04235504; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona de Portu
- Medtronic Diabetes, Medtronic International Trading Sarl, Tolochenaz, Vaud, Switzerland
| | - Linda Vorrink
- Medtronic Diabetes, Medtronic International Trading Sarl, Tolochenaz, Vaud, Switzerland
| | - Roseline Re
- Medtronic Diabetes, Medtronic International Trading Sarl, Tolochenaz, Vaud, Switzerland
| | - John Shin
- Clinical Research, Biostatistics, and Bioinformatics, Medtronic Diabetes, Northridge, California, USA
| | - Javier Castaneda
- Statistics, Medtronic Bakken Research Center BV, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Aklilu Habteab
- Statistics, Medtronic Bakken Research Center BV, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Ohad Cohen
- Medtronic Diabetes, Medtronic International Trading Sarl, Tolochenaz, Vaud, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brilhante RRDC, Moreira TMM, Oliveira SKPD, Florêncio RS, Pessoa VLMDP, Cestari VRF. Álbum seriado sobre Sistema de Infusão Contínua de Insulina como tecnologia educativa inovadora no diabetes. Rev Bras Enferm 2022. [DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0277pt] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
RESUMO Objetivo: construir e validar conteúdo e aparência de álbum seriado sobre insulinoterapia por Sistema de Infusão Contínua. Método: estudo metodológico, realizado em três etapas em Fortaleza, Ceará, Brasil, nos meses de agosto a novembro de 2018. Realizou-se a construção do álbum seriado e a validação de conteúdo e aparência pelos especialistas, e avaliação do público-alvo. Calcularam-se Índice de Validade de Conteúdo e Índice de Concordância. Resultados: os juízes consideraram válidos o conteúdo e a aparência do álbum, o que representa que o material é adequado como tecnologia educativa. Os especialistas sugeriram ajustes, incorporados ao material para produção impressa da versão final. O público-alvo também avaliou de forma positiva o álbum seriado. Conclusão: percebemos que o álbum seriado foi considerado uma tecnologia educacional inovadora em diabetes, valiosa para a promoção do conhecimento sobre Sistema de Infusão Contínua de Insulina, com conteúdo rico, atualizado, aliado à clareza, formato adequado e ilustrações explicativas.
Collapse
|
16
|
Biester T, Tauschmann M, Chobot A, Kordonouri O, Danne T, Kapellen T, Dovc K. The automated pancreas: A review of technologies and clinical practice. Diabetes Obes Metab 2022; 24 Suppl 1:43-57. [PMID: 34658126 DOI: 10.1111/dom.14576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Insulin pumps and glucose sensors are effective in improving diabetes therapy and reducing acute complications. The combination of both devices using an algorithm-driven interoperable controller makes automated insulin delivery (AID) systems possible. Many AID systems have been tested in clinical trials and have proven safety and effectiveness. However, currently, none of these systems are available for routine use in children younger than 6 years in Europe. For continued use, both users and prescribers must have sound knowledge of the features of the individual AID systems. Presently, all systems require various user interactions (e.g. meal announcements) because fully automated systems are not yet developed. Open-source systems are non-regulated variants to circumvent existing regulatory conditions. There are risks here for both users and prescribers. To evaluate AID therapy, the metric data of the glucose sensors, 'time in target range' and 'glucose management index', are novel recognized and suitable parameters allowing a consultation based on real glucose and insulin pump download data from the daily life of people with diabetes. Read out via cloud-based software or automatic download of such individual treatment data provides the ideal technical basis for shared decision-making through telemedicine, which must be further evaluated for general use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torben Biester
- AUF DER BULT, Diabetes Center for Children and Adolescents, Hannover, Germany
| | - Martin Tauschmann
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Agata Chobot
- Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, Opole, Poland
| | - Olga Kordonouri
- AUF DER BULT, Diabetes Center for Children and Adolescents, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas Danne
- AUF DER BULT, Diabetes Center for Children and Adolescents, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas Kapellen
- Department of Pediatrics, MEDIAN Clinic for Children 'Am Nicolausholz' Bad Kösen, Naumburg, Germany
| | - Klemen Dovc
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, UMC - University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Janez A, Battelino T, Klupa T, Kocsis G, Kuricová M, Lalić N, Stoian AP, Prázný M, Rahelić D, Šoupal J, Tankova T, Zelinska N. Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems for the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes: A Collaborative, Expert Group Position Statement for Clinical Use in Central and Eastern Europe. Diabetes Ther 2021; 12:3107-3135. [PMID: 34694585 PMCID: PMC8586062 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-021-01160-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
In both pediatric and adult populations with type 1 diabetes (T1D), technologies such as continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), or sensor-augmented pumps (SAP) can consistently improve glycemic control [measured as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and time in range (TIR)] while reducing the risk of hypoglycemia. Use of technologies can thereby improve quality of life and reduce the burden of diabetes management compared with self-injection of multiple daily insulin doses (MDI). Novel hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems represent the latest treatment modality for T1D, combining modern glucose sensors and insulin pumps with a linked control algorithm to offer automated insulin delivery in response to blood glucose levels and trends. HCL systems have been associated with increased TIR, improved HbA1c, and fewer hypoglycemic events compared with CSII, SAP, and MDI, thereby potentially improving quality of life for people with diabetes (PwD) while reducing the costs of treating short- and long-term diabetes-related complications. However, many barriers to their use and regional inequalities remain in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Published data suggest that access to diabetes technologies is hindered by lack of funding, underdeveloped health technology assessment (HTA) bodies and guidelines, unfamiliarity with novel therapies, and inadequacies in healthcare system capacities. To optimize the use of diabetes technologies in CEE, an international meeting comprising experts in the field of diabetes was held to map the current regional access, to present the current national reimbursement guidelines, and to recommend solutions to overcome uptake barriers. Recommendations included regional and national development of HTA bodies, efficient allocation of resources, and structured education programs for healthcare professionals and PwD. The responsibility of the healthcare community to ensure that all individuals with T1D gain access to modern technologies in a timely and economically responsible manner, thereby improving health outcomes, was emphasized, particularly for interventions that are cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrej Janez
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Zaloska 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| | - Tadej Battelino
- University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tomasz Klupa
- Department of Metabolic Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
- University Hospital, Kraków, Poland
| | - Győző Kocsis
- Department of Medicine and Oncology, Semmelweis University Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Miriam Kuricová
- Pediatric Department, National Institute of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Ľubochňa, Slovakia
- Department of Children and Adolescents, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia
| | - Nebojša Lalić
- Faculty of Medicine of the University of Belgrade, Clinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Anca Pantea Stoian
- Department of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Martin Prázný
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czechia
| | - Dario Rahelić
- Vuk Vrhovac University Clinic for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Merkur University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
- School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
- School of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
| | - Jan Šoupal
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czechia
| | - Tsvetalina Tankova
- Department of Endocrinology, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Nataliya Zelinska
- Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Center of Endocrine Surgery, Transplantation of Endocrine Organs and Tissues of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pauley ME, Berget C, Messer LH, Forlenza GP. Barriers to Uptake of Insulin Technologies and Novel Solutions. MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH 2021; 14:339-354. [PMID: 34803408 PMCID: PMC8594891 DOI: 10.2147/mder.s312858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Diabetes-related technology has undergone great advancement in recent years. These technological devices are more commonly utilized in the type 1 diabetes population, which requires insulin as the primary treatment modality. Available devices include insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitors, and hybrid systems referred to as automated insulin delivery systems or hybrid closed-loop systems, which combine those two devices along with software algorithms to achieve advanced therapeutic capabilities, including automatic modulation of insulin delivery based on sensor-derived glucose levels to minimize abnormal glucose trends. Use of diabetes technology is associated with significant positive health and psychosocial outcomes, yet utilization rates are generally lacking across both adult and pediatric type 1 diabetes populations in the United States and other countries. There are consistent themes in existing barriers to technology uptake reported by individuals with type 1 diabetes or parents of children with type 1 diabetes, including physical burdens associated with wearing the devices, concerns in navigating the technology and the devices’ abilities to meet user expectations, high cost, inadequate resources within the healthcare team to support device use, disparities in technology access, and psychosocial barriers. It is important to understand the common barriers to uptake of not only the automated insulin delivery systems but also their component devices (insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitors) to fully support individuals in utilizing these devices and optimizing health benefits. The purpose of this article is to summarize the current automated insulin delivery devices that are available for use in management of type 1 diabetes, review common barriers to uptake of those systems and their component devices, and provide expert opinion on existing and future solutions to identified barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan E Pauley
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Cari Berget
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Laurel H Messer
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Gregory P Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fantasia KL, Wirunsawanya K, Lee C, Rizo I. Racial Disparities in Diabetes Technology Use and Outcomes in Type 1 Diabetes in a Safety-Net Hospital. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2021; 15:1010-1017. [PMID: 33719610 PMCID: PMC8442173 DOI: 10.1177/1932296821995810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited data exist regarding diabetes technology use among adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in urban racially/ethnically diverse safety-net hospitals. We examined racial/ethnic differences in the use of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in this setting. METHODS A retrospective review of 227 patients ≥ 18 years of age with T1D seen in an urban, safety-net endocrinology clinic during 2016-2017 was completed (mean age: 39; 80% English-speaking; 50% had public insurance). Diabetes technology use, defined as either CGM or CSII or both CGM and CSII, and clinical outcomes were examined by race/ethnicity. RESULTS Overall, 30% used CGM and 26% used CSII. After adjusting for age, language, insurance, and annual income, diabetes technology use in non-White patients was significantly lower than in White patients, predominantly lower in Black (aOR 0.25 [95% CI 0.11-0.56]) and patients identified as other race/ethnicity (aOR 0.30 [95% CI 0.11-0.77]). At the highest household income level (≥$75,000/y), Black and Hispanic individuals were significantly less likely than White individuals to use diabetes technology (P < .0007). Mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was lower in patients using any diabetes technology compared with patients using no technology (P < .0001). Use of CGM and CSII together was associated with the lowest HbA1c across all racial/ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS Racial/ethnic disparities in diabetes technology use and glycemic control were observed even after adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Further research should explore barriers to accessing diabetes technology in non-White populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ivania Rizo
- Ivania Rizo, MD, Section of Endocrinology,
Diabetes, and Nutrition, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical
Center, 720 Harrison Avenue, Ste 8100, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ferrito L, Passanisi S, Bonfanti R, Cherubini V, Minuto N, Schiaffini R, Scaramuzza A. Efficacy of advanced hybrid closed loop systems for the management of type 1 diabetes in children. Minerva Pediatr (Torino) 2021; 73:474-485. [PMID: 34309344 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5276.21.06531-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Over the last years significant advances have been achieved in the development of technologies for diabetes management. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), predictive low glucose management (PLGM), hybrid closed loop (HCL) and advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) systems allow better diabetes management, thus reducing the burden of the disease and the risk of chronic complications. This review summarizes the main characteristics of the currently available HCL and AHCL systems and their primary effects in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). The findings of trials assessing the glucose control (time in range, HbA1c values, hypoglycemic events), the health-related quality of life and the existing limits of the use of these technologies are reported. The most recent data clearly confirm the ability of the HCL and AHCL insulin delivery systems to safely achieve a significant improvement of glucose control and quality of life in the pediatric population with T1D. Further studies are underway to overcame current barriers and future improvements in the usability of these technologies are awaited to facilitate their use in the routine clinical practice. The HCL and AHCL algorithms are the key features of today's insulin delivery systems that mark a crucial step towards fully automated closed loop systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Ferrito
- Division of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Senigallia Hospital, Senigallia, Ancona, Italy
| | - Stefano Passanisi
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bonfanti
- Diabetes Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Valentino Cherubini
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, G. Salesi Hospital, Ancona, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Grunberger G, Sherr J, Allende M, Blevins T, Bode B, Handelsman Y, Hellman R, Lajara R, Roberts VL, Rodbard D, Stec C, Unger J. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: The Use of Advanced Technology in the Management of Persons With Diabetes Mellitus. Endocr Pract 2021; 27:505-537. [PMID: 34116789 DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2021.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of advanced technology in the management of persons with diabetes mellitus to clinicians, diabetes-care teams, health care professionals, and other stakeholders. METHODS The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology (AACE) conducted literature searches for relevant articles published from 2012 to 2021. A task force of medical experts developed evidence-based guideline recommendations based on a review of clinical evidence, expertise, and informal consensus, according to established AACE protocol for guideline development. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes of interest included hemoglobin A1C, rates and severity of hypoglycemia, time in range, time above range, and time below range. RESULTS This guideline includes 37 evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for advanced diabetes technology and contains 357 citations that inform the evidence base. RECOMMENDATIONS Evidence-based recommendations were developed regarding the efficacy and safety of devices for the management of persons with diabetes mellitus, metrics used to aide with the assessment of advanced diabetes technology, and standards for the implementation of this technology. CONCLUSIONS Advanced diabetes technology can assist persons with diabetes to safely and effectively achieve glycemic targets, improve quality of life, add greater convenience, potentially reduce burden of care, and offer a personalized approach to self-management. Furthermore, diabetes technology can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of clinical decision-making. Successful integration of these technologies into care requires knowledge about the functionality of devices in this rapidly changing field. This information will allow health care professionals to provide necessary education and training to persons accessing these treatments and have the required expertise to interpret data and make appropriate treatment adjustments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer Sherr
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Myriam Allende
- University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | | | - Bruce Bode
- Atlanta Diabetes Associates, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Richard Hellman
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri
| | | | | | - David Rodbard
- Biomedical Informatics Consultants, LLC, Potomac, Maryland
| | - Carla Stec
- American Association of Clinical Endocrinology, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Jeff Unger
- Unger Primary Care Concierge Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, California
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kwa T, Zhang G, Shepard K, Wherry K, Chattaraj S. The improved survival rate and cost-effectiveness of a 7-day continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion set. J Med Econ 2021; 24:837-845. [PMID: 34154504 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1945784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The purpose of this article is to compare the insulin cost-savings of the Medtronic Extended Infusion Set (or EIS, a.k.a. Extended Wear Infusion Set) designed and labeled for up to 7-day use with rapid-acting insulins to the current standard of care, 2- to 3-day infusion sets. METHODS There are three major improvements (reducing insulin waste, plastic waste, and adverse events) with the extended duration of infusion set wear. This analysis focuses on cost savings from reduced insulin wastage during set changes. Studies published on insulin infusion set survival and EIS clinical trial data (NCT04113694) were used to estimate device lifetime performance using a Markov chain Monte Carlo model, including the assessment of adverse effects and device failure. Total costs associated with infusion set change or failure were systematically found in published literature or estimated based on physical usage, and the direct impact on insulin costs was calculated. RESULTS Based on the model and clinical data, EIS users can expect to change their infusion sets about 75 fewer times than standard set users each year. The costs related to unrecoverable insulin during an infusion set and reservoir change in the US were estimated to range from $19.79 to $22.48, resulting in approximately $1324 to $1677 in annual cost-savings for the typical user from minimizing insulin wastage. LIMITATIONS The study only assessed devices used within a monitored setting, that is, clinical trials. In addition, the variability associated with healthcare standards and costs and individual treatment variability including insulin dosages, contribute to the uncertainties with the calculations. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis demonstrates that by extending the duration of infusion set wear, there may be substantial cost savings by reducing insulin wastage.
Collapse
|
23
|
Pu Z, Zhang X, Yu H, Tu J, Chen H, Liu Y, Su X, Wang R, Zhang L, Li D. A thermal activated and differential self-calibrated flexible epidermal biomicrofluidic device for wearable accurate blood glucose monitoring. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2021; 7:7/5/eabd0199. [PMID: 33571117 PMCID: PMC7840141 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd0199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
This paper reports a flexible electronics-based epidermal biomicrofluidics technique for clinical continuous blood glucose monitoring, overcoming the drawback of the present wearables, unreliable measurements. A thermal activation method is proposed to improve the efficiency of transdermal interstitial fluid (ISF) extraction, enabling extraction with a low current density to notably reduce skin irritation. An Na+ sensor and a correction model are proposed to eliminate the effect of individual differences, which leads to fluctuations in the amount of ISF extraction. An electrochemical sensor with a 3D nanostructured working electrode surface is designed to enable precise in situ glucose measurement. A differential structure is proposed to eliminate the effect of passive perspiration, which leads to inaccurate blood glucose prediction. Fabrications of the epidermal biomicrofluidic device including formation of flexible electrodes, nanomaterial modification, and enzyme immobilization are fully realized by inkjet printing to enable facile manufacturing with low cost, which benefits practical production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhihua Pu
- State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Xingguo Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Haixia Yu
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Biomedical Detecting Techniques and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Jiaan Tu
- State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Hailong Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yuncong Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiao Su
- State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Ridong Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Dachao Li
- State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Qian F, Schumacher PJ. Latest Advancements in Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Technologies in Treating Type 1 Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2021; 15:195-197. [PMID: 32840141 PMCID: PMC7782992 DOI: 10.1177/1932296820949940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Qian
- Department of Health Policy, Management, and Behavior, School of Public Health, University at Albany-State University of New York, Rensselaer, NY, USA
- Feng Qian, MD, PhD, MBA, One University Place, GEC Rm169, Rensselaer, NY 12144-3445, USA.
| | - Patrick J. Schumacher
- Department of Health Policy, Management, and Behavior, School of Public Health, University at Albany-State University of New York, Rensselaer, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Roze S, Buompensiere MI, Ozdemir Z, de Portu S, Cohen O. Cost-effectiveness of a novel hybrid closed-loop system compared with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in people with type 1 diabetes in the UK. J Med Econ 2021; 24:883-890. [PMID: 34098834 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1939706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The MiniMed 670 G insulin pump system is the first commercially available hybrid closed-loop (HCL) insulin delivery system and clinical studies have shown that this device is associated with incremental benefits in glycemic control relative to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with or without continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). The aim was to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of the MiniMed 670 G system versus CSII alone in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the UK. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model. Clinical input data were sourced from a clinical trial of the MiniMed 670 G system in 124 adults and adolescents with T1D. The analysis was performed over a lifetime time horizon and both future costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum. The analysis was performed from a healthcare payer perspective. RESULTS The use of the MiniMed 670 G system led to an improvement in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 1.73 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), relative to CSII. Total lifetime direct costs were GBP 35,425 higher with the MiniMed 670 G system than with CSII resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of GBP 20,421 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the ICER was sensitive to assumptions around glycemic control and assumptions relating to the quality-of-life benefit associated with a reduction in fear of hypoglycemia. LIMITATIONS Long-term projections from short-term data are inherently associated with uncertainty but represent arguably the best available evidence in lieu of long-term clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS In the UK, over patient lifetimes, the incremental clinical benefits associated with the use of MiniMed 670 G system means that it is likely to be cost-effective relative to the continued use of CSII in people with T1D, particularly for those with a fear of hypoglycemia or poor baseline glycemic control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Zeynep Ozdemir
- Medtronic International Trading Sàrl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland
| | - Simona de Portu
- Medtronic International Trading Sàrl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland
| | - Ohad Cohen
- Medtronic International Trading Sàrl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dovc K, Battelino T. Closed-loop insulin delivery systems in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2020; 17:157-166. [PMID: 32077342 DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2020.1713747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Optimal glycemic control remains challenging in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes due to highly variable day-to-day and night-to-night insulin requirements. This hurdle could be addressed by glucose-responsive insulin delivery based on real-time continuous glucose measurements.Areas covered: This review summaries recent advances of closed-loop systems in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes, using both single- and dual-hormone closed-loop systems. The main outcomes, proportions of time spent in target range 70-180 mg/dl, and time spent in hypoglycemia below 70 mg/dl, are assessed particularly during unsupervised free-living randomized controlled trials.Expert opinion: Noteworthy and clinically meaningful translation of experimental investigations from controlled in-hospital settings to unrestricted home studies have been achieved over the past years, resulting in the regulatory approval of the first hybrid closed-loop system also in the pediatric population and with several other advanced devices in the pipeline. Large multinational and pivotal clinical trials including broad age populations are underway to facilitate the use of closed-loop systems in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klemen Dovc
- Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, UMC - University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tadej Battelino
- Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, UMC - University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pease A, Zomer E, Liew D, Earnest A, Soldatos G, Ademi Z, Zoungas S. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Hybrid Closed-Loop System Versus Multiple Daily Injections and Capillary Glucose Testing for Adults with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2020; 22:812-821. [PMID: 32348159 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2020.0064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background: Hybrid closed-loop systems may offer improved HbA1c levels, more time-in-range, and less hypoglycemia than alternative treatment strategies. However, it is unclear if glycemic improvements offset this technology's higher acquisition costs. Among adults with type 1 diabetes in Australia, we sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a hybrid closed-loop system in comparison with the current standard of care, comprising insulin injections and capillary glucose testing. Methods: Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using decision analysis in combination with a Markov model to simulate disease progression in a cohort of adults with type 1 diabetes and compare the downstream health and economic consequences of hybrid closed-loop therapy versus current standard of care. Transition probabilities and utilities were sourced from published studies. Costs were considered from the perspective of the Australian health care system. A lifetime horizon was considered, with annual discount rates of 5% applied to future costs and outcomes. Uncertainty was assessed with probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses. Results: Use of a hybrid closed-loop system resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Australian dollars (AUD) 37,767 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. This is below the traditionally cited willingness to pay a threshold of $50,000 per QALY gained in the Australian setting. Sensitivity analyses that varied baseline glycemic control, treatment effects, technology costs, age, discount rates, and time horizon indicated the results to be robust. Conclusions: For adults with type 1 diabetes, hybrid closed-loop therapy is likely to be cost-effective compared with multiple daily injections and capillary glucose testing in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Pease
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ella Zomer
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Danny Liew
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Arul Earnest
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Georgia Soldatos
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Zanfina Ademi
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sophia Zoungas
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Berget C, Lange S, Messer L, Forlenza GP. A clinical review of the t:slim X2 insulin pump. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2020; 17:1675-1687. [PMID: 32842794 DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2020.1814734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Insulin pumps are commonly used for intensive insulin therapy to treat type 1 diabetes in adults and youth. Insulin pump technologies have advanced dramatically in the last several years to integrate with continuous glucose monitors (CGM) and incorporate control algorithms. These control algorithms automate some insulin delivery in response to the glucose information received from the CGM to reduce the occurrence of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia and improve overall glycemic control. The t:slim X2 insulin pump system became commercially available in 2016. It is an innovative insulin pump technology that can be updated remotely by the user to install new software onto the pump device as new technologies become available. Currently, the t:slim X2 pairs with the Dexcom G6 CGM and there are two advanced software options available: Basal-IQ, which is a predictive low glucose suspend (PLGS) technology, and Control-IQ, which is a Hybrid Closed Loop (HCL) technology. This paper will describe the different types of advanced insulin pump technologies, review how the t:slim X2 insulin pump works, and summarize the clinical studies leading to FDA approval and commercialization of the Basal-IQ and Control-IQ technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cari Berget
- School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Campus , Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Samantha Lange
- School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Campus , Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Laurel Messer
- School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Campus , Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Gregory P Forlenza
- School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Campus , Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pease A, Zomer E, Liew D, Lo C, Earnest A, Zoungas S. Cost-effectiveness of health technologies in adults with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Syst Rev 2020; 9:171. [PMID: 32746937 PMCID: PMC7401226 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01373-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the rapid development of technologies for type 1 diabetes, economic evaluations are integral in guiding cost-effective clinical and policy decisions. We therefore aimed to review and synthesise the current economic literature for available diabetes management technologies and outline key determinants of cost-effectiveness. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in April 2019 that focused on modelling or trial based economic evaluations. Searched databases included Medline, Medline in-process and other non-indexed citations, EMBASE, PubMed, All Evidenced Based Medicine Reviews, EconLit, Cost-effectiveness analysis Registry, Research Papers in Economics, Web of Science, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and PROSPERO from inception. We assessed quality of included studies with the Questionnaire to Assess Relevance and Credibility of Modeling Studies for Informing Health Care Decision Making an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC good practice task force report. Screening of abstracts and full-texts, appraisal, and extraction were performed by two independent researches. RESULTS We identified 16,772 publications, of which 35 were analysed and included 11 health technologies. Despite a lack of consensus, most studies reported that insulin pumps (56%) or interstitial glucose sensors (62%) were cost-effective, although incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranged widely ($14,266-$2,997,832 USD). Cost-effectiveness for combined insulin pumps and glucose sensors was less clear. Determinants of cost-effectiveness included treatment effects on glycosylated haemoglobin and hypoglycaemia, costing of technologies and complications, and measures of utility. CONCLUSIONS Insulin pumps or glucose sensors appeared cost-effective, particularly in populations with higher HbA1c levels and rates of hypoglycaemia. However, cost-effectiveness for combined insulin pumps and glucose sensors was less clear. REGISTRATION The study was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42017077221.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Pease
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia.,Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ella Zomer
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
| | - Danny Liew
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
| | - Clement Lo
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia.,Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Arul Earnest
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
| | - Sophia Zoungas
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia. .,Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. .,Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Artificial Pancreas Control Strategies Used for Type 1 Diabetes Control and Treatment: A Comprehensive Analysis. APPLIED SYSTEM INNOVATION 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/asi3030031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive survey about the fundamental components of the artificial pancreas (AP) system including insulin administration and delivery, glucose measurement (GM), and control strategies/algorithms used for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) treatment and control. Our main focus is on the T1DM that emerges due to pancreas’s failure to produce sufficient insulin due to the loss of beta cells (β-cells). We discuss various insulin administration and delivery methods including physiological methods, open-loop, and closed-loop schemes. Furthermore, we report several factors such as hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and many other physical factors that need to be considered while infusing insulin in human body via AP systems. We discuss three prominent control algorithms including proportional-integral- derivative (PID), fuzzy logic, and model predictive, which have been clinically evaluated and have all shown promising results. In addition, linear and non-linear insulin infusion control schemes have been formally discussed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work which systematically covers recent developments in the AP components with a solid foundation for future studies in the T1DM field.
Collapse
|
31
|
Gajewska KA, Biesma R, Bennett K, Sreenan S. Availability of and access to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy for adults with type 1 diabetes in Ireland. Acta Diabetol 2020; 57:875-882. [PMID: 32124077 DOI: 10.1007/s00592-020-01497-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The uptake of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) is low in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in Ireland, compared to other countries where CSII is reimbursed. To explore the reasons for the low uptake, this study aims to investigate the availability of CSII in adult diabetes clinics in Ireland. METHODS A national survey of all adult diabetes clinics (public and private) in Ireland was conducted and completed anonymously by the lead physician/diabetes nurse specialist in each clinic. Descriptive statistics and comparisons between clinics offering different levels of care for CSII are presented. RESULTS Of 50 diabetes clinics invited, 47 (94%) participated in the study. Fifteen clinics (32%) offered no support for CSII, while 21 (45%) reported offering both training to commence CSII and ongoing support. Based on the survey findings, access to CSII was unavailable for 2426 (11%) of those with T1DM. The majority (n = 15,831, 71% of 22,321 T1DM population) received diabetes care from clinics offering CSII training, but only 2165 were using CSII (10% of T1DM population). Uptake of CSII was higher in clinics offering training than in those offering follow-up care for CSII only (12% vs. 5%, p < 0.001). Clinics offering all CSII services had more specialists (p = 0.005 for endocrinologists and p < 0.001 for dietitians). Reasons for not offering CSII services included staff shortages and heavy workload. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the low uptake of CSII in Ireland and demonstrates that, even when reimbursed, other barriers to uptake of CSII can limit its use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Anna Gajewska
- Division of Population Health Sciences, RCSI: University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Beaux Lane House, Mercer Street Lower, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Regien Biesma
- Global Health Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Kathleen Bennett
- Division of Population Health Sciences, RCSI: University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Beaux Lane House, Mercer Street Lower, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Seamus Sreenan
- 3U Diabetes, RCSI: University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, RCSI: University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Connolly Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Talking Points for Helping Your Type 1 Diabetes Patient Decide About Hybrid Closed Loop. Can J Diabetes 2020; 44:356-358. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
33
|
Abstract
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic illness that requires intensive lifelong management of blood glucose concentrations by means of external insulin administration. There have been substantial developments in the ways of measuring glucose levels, which is crucial to T1D self-management. Recently, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has allowed people with T1D to keep track of their blood glucose levels in near real-time. These devices have alarms that warn users about potentially dangerous blood glucose trends, which can often be shared with ther people. CGM is consistently associated with improved glycemic control and reduced hypoglycemia and is currently recommended by doctors. However, due to the costs of CGM, only those who qualify for hospital provision or those who can personally afford it are able to use it, which excludes many people. In this paper, I argue that unequal access to CGM results in: (1) unjust health inequalities, (2) relational injustice, (3) injustice with regard to agency and autonomy, and (4) epistemic injustice. These considerations provide prima facie moral reasons why all people with T1D should have access to CGM technology. I discuss the specific case of CGM policy in the Netherlands, which currently only provides coverage for a small group of people with T1D, and argue that, especially with additional considerations of cost-effectiveness, the Dutch government ought to include CGM in basic health care insurance for all people with T1D.
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic illness that requires intensive lifelong management of blood glucose concentrations by means of external insulin administration. There have been substantial developments in the ways of measuring glucose levels, which is crucial to T1D self-management. Recently, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has allowed people with T1D to keep track of their blood glucose levels in near real-time. These devices have alarms that warn users about potentially dangerous blood glucose trends, which can often be shared with ther people. CGM is consistently associated with improved glycemic control and reduced hypoglycemia and is currently recommended by doctors. However, due to the costs of CGM, only those who qualify for hospital provision or those who can personally afford it are able to use it, which excludes many people. In this paper, I argue that unequal access to CGM results in: (1) unjust health inequalities, (2) relational injustice, (3) injustice with regard to agency and autonomy, and (4) epistemic injustice. These considerations provide prima facie moral reasons why all people with T1D should have access to CGM technology. I discuss the specific case of CGM policy in the Netherlands, which currently only provides coverage for a small group of people with T1D, and argue that, especially with additional considerations of cost-effectiveness, the Dutch government ought to include CGM in basic health care insurance for all people with T1D.
Collapse
|
35
|
|
36
|
Saunders A, Messer LH, Forlenza GP. MiniMed 670G hybrid closed loop artificial pancreas system for the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus: overview of its safety and efficacy. Expert Rev Med Devices 2019; 16:845-853. [PMID: 31540557 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1670639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Automated insulin delivery for people with type 1 diabetes has been a major goal in the diabetes technology field for many years. While a fully automated system has not yet been accomplished, the MiniMed™ 670G artificial pancreas (AP) system is the first commercially available insulin pump that automates basal insulin delivery, while still requiring user input for insulin boluses. Determining the safety and efficacy of this system is essential to the development of future devices striving for more automation. Areas Covered: This review will provide an overview of how the MiniMed 670G system works including its safety and efficacy, how it compares to similar devices, and anticipated future advances in diabetes technology currently under development. Expert Opinion: The ultimate goal of advanced diabetes technologies is to reduce the burden and amount of management required of patients with diabetes. In addition to reducing patient workload, achieving better glucose control and improving hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values are essential for reducing the threat of diabetes-related complications further down the road. Current devices come close to reaching these goals, but understanding the unmet needs of patients with diabetes will allow future technologies to achieve these goals more quickly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aria Saunders
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado Denver , Denver , CO , USA
| | - Laurel H Messer
- Barbara Davis Center, University of Colorado Denver , Aurora , CO , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
De Ridder F, den Brinker M, De Block C. The road from intermittently scanned glucose monitoring to hybrid closed-loop systems: Part A. Keys to success: subject profiles, choice of systems, education. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 2019; 10:2042018819865399. [PMID: 31384420 PMCID: PMC6659176 DOI: 10.1177/2042018819865399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Managing type 1 diabetes (T1DM) is challenging and requires intensive glucose monitoring and titration of insulin in order to reduce the risk of complications. The use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, either flash or intermittently scanned glucose monitoring (isCGM) or real-time (RT) CGM, has positively affected the management of type 1 diabetes with the potential to lower HbA1c, enhance time spent in range, reduce frequency and time spent in hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, lower glycemic variability, and improve quality of life. In recent years, both CGM and pump technology have advanced, with improved functional features and integration, including low glucose suspend (LGS), predictive low glucose suspend (PLGS), and hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems. In this review, we highlight the benefits and limitations of use of isCGM/RT-CGM for open-loop control and recent progress in closed-loop control systems. We also discuss different subject profiles for the different systems, and focus on educational aspects that are key to successful use of the systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca De Ridder
- University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine &
Health Sciences, Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics (LEMP),
Antwerp, Belgium
- Antwerp University Hospital, Department of
Endocrinology-Diabetology-Metabolism, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | |
Collapse
|