Elucidation of Formulation and Delivery Device-Related Effects on In Vitro Performance of Nasal Spray with Implication to Rational Product Specification Identification

Chitosan-Based Thermogelling System for Nose-to-Brain Donepezil Delivery: Optimising Formulation Properties and Nasal Deposition Profile

Donepezil nasal delivery strategies are being continuously investigated for advancing therapy in Alzheimer's disease. The aim of this study was to develop a chitosan-based, donepezil-loaded thermogelling formulation tailored to meet all the requirements for efficient nose-to-brain delivery. A statistical design of the experiments was implemented for the optimisation of the formulation and/or administration parameters, with regard to formulation viscosity, gelling and spray properties, as well as its targeted nasal deposition within the 3D-printed nasal cavity model. The optimised formulation was further characterised in terms of stability, in vitro release, in vitro biocompatibility and permeability (using Calu-3 cells), ex vivo mucoadhesion (using porcine nasal mucosa), and in vivo irritability (using slug mucosal irritation assay). The applied research design resulted in the development of a sprayable donepezil delivery platform characterised by instant gelation at 34 °C and olfactory deposition reaching a remarkably high 71.8% of the applied dose. The optimised formulation showed prolonged drug release (t_1/2 about 90 min), mucoadhesive behaviour, and reversible permeation enhancement, with a 20-fold increase in adhesion and a 1.5-fold increase in the apparent permeability coefficient in relation to the corresponding donepezil solution. The slug mucosal irritation assay demonstrated an acceptable irritability profile, indicating its potential for safe nasal delivery. It can be concluded that the developed thermogelling formulation showed great promise as an efficient donepezil brain-targeted delivery system. Furthermore, the formulation is worth investigating in vivo for final feasibility confirmation.

Establishing quantitative relationships between changes in nasal spray in vitro metrics and drug delivery to the posterior nasal region

Nasal sprays are typically characterized using in vitro spray metrics such as spray cone angle and droplet size distribution. It is currently not clear how these in vitro metrics correlate with regional nasal deposition, and these relationships could help explain the impact of product differences. In this study, the effects of changes in spray cone angle, spray velocity, spray ovality and droplet size distribution on regional nasal deposition were analyzed using a validated computational fluid dynamics model in recently developed adult characteristic nasal airway anatomies. The impact of the spray on the surrounding air phase was included. Results indicated that changes in spray cone angle largely influenced the nasal posterior deposition (PD) of the drug. Changes in the plume ovality and characteristic droplet size moderately influenced PD, but the results were dependent on the insertion conditions and nasal geometry. Changes in spray velocity and uniformity constant of the droplet size distribution had only minimal influence on PD. The rank order of metrics having the greatest to least impact on PD was cone angle ≫ plume ovality ≫ characteristic droplet size ≫ velocity ≫ size distribution uniformity constant. Overall, results from this study established quantitative relationships for predicting expected changes in PD.

Spray Pattern and Plume Geometry Testing and Methodology: An IPAC-RS Working Group Overview

Plume characterization for orally inhaled and nasal drug products (OINDP) provides valuable information during OINDP development. Spray pattern and plume geometry techniques, methods, and technology have evolved over the past 20 years since the publication of the original 1998 FDA MDI DPI draft guidance. The International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS) discusses the historical context and background to plume geometry and spray pattern characterization studies; provides an analysis of the current regulatory context; addresses results from its industry surveys on application and value of such testing; and presents case studies and best practices-seeking to provide insights to regulatory bodies and other stakeholders. Assessment and consideration of published studies and industry experience note the value of plume geometry and spray pattern in development, and that further data is needed regarding their use in assessing formulation characteristics. Continued dialogue between industry and regulatory bodies is needed to establish the optimum use of these techniques.

Importance of Spray–Wall Interaction and Post-Deposition Liquid Motion in the Transport and Delivery of Pharmaceutical Nasal Sprays

Nasal sprays, which produce relatively large pharmaceutical droplets and have high momentum, are primarily used to deliver locally acting drugs to the nasal mucosa. Depending on spray pump administration conditions and insertion angles, nasal sprays may interact with the nasal surface in ways that creates complex droplet–wall interactions followed by significant liquid motion after initial wall contact. Additionally, liquid motion can occur after deposition as the spray liquid moves in bulk along the nasal surface. It is difficult or impossible to capture these conditions with commonly used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models of spray droplet transport that typically employ a deposit-on-touch boundary condition. Hence, an updated CFD framework with a new spray–wall interaction (SWI) model in tandem with a post-deposition liquid motion (PDLM) model was developed and applied to evaluate nasal spray delivery for Flonase and Flonase Sensimist products. For both nasal spray products, CFD revealed significant effects of the spray momentum on surface liquid motion, as well as motion of the surface film due to airflow generated shear stress and gravity. With Flonase, these factors substantially influenced the final resting place of the liquid. For Flonase Sensimist, anterior and posterior liquid movements were approximately balanced over time. As a result, comparisons with concurrent in vitro experimental results were substantially improved for Flonase compared with the traditional deposit-on-touch boundary condition. The new SWI-PDLM model highlights the dynamicenvironment that occurs when a nasal spray interacts with a nasal wall surface and can be used to better understand the delivery of current nasal spray products as well as to develop new nasal drug delivery strategies with improved regional targeting.

In situ gelling nanosuspension as an advanced platform for fluticasone propionate nasal delivery

In this work we present the development of in situ gelling nanosuspension as advanced form for fluticasone propionate nasal delivery. Drug nanocrystals were prepared by wet milling technique. Incorporation of drug nanocrystals into polymeric in situ gelling system with pectin and sodium hyaluronate as constitutive polymers was fine-tuned attaining appropriate formulation surface tension, viscosity and gelling ability. Drug nanonisation improved the release profile and enhanced formulation mucoadhesive properties. QbD approach combining formulation and administration parameters resulted in optimised nasal deposition profile, with 51.8% of the dose deposited in the middle meatus, the critical region in the treatment of rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis. Results obtained in biocompatibility and physico-chemical stability studies confirmed the leading formulation potential for safe and efficient nasal corticosteroid delivery.

In Vitro Evaluation of Nasal Aerosol Depositions: An Insight for Direct Nose to Brain Drug Delivery

The nasal cavity is an attractive route for both local and systemic drug delivery and holds great potential for access to the brain via the olfactory region, an area where the blood–brain barrier (BBB) is effectively absent. However, the olfactory region is located at the roof of the nasal cavity and only represents ~5–7% of the epithelial surface area, presenting significant challenges for the deposition of drug molecules for nose to brain drug delivery (NTBDD). Aerosolized particles have the potential to be directed to the olfactory region, but their specific deposition within this area is confounded by a complex combination of factors, which include the properties of the formulation, the delivery device and how it is used, and differences in inter-patient physiology. In this review, an in-depth examination of these different factors is provided in relation to both in vitro and in vivo studies and how advances in the fabrication of nasal cast models and analysis of aerosol deposition can be utilized to predict in vivo outcomes more accurately. The challenges faced in assessing the nasal deposition of aerosolized particles within the paediatric population are specifically considered, representing an unmet need for nasal and NTBDD to treat CNS disorders.

A consensus research agenda for optimising nasal drug delivery

Nasal drug delivery has specific challenges which are distinct from oral inhalation, alongside which it is often considered. The next generation of nasal products will be required to deliver new classes of molecule, e.g. vaccines, biologics and drugs with action in the brain or sinuses, to local and systemic therapeutic targets. Innovations and new tools/knowledge are required to design products to deliver these therapeutic agents to the right target at the right time in the right patients. We report the outcomes of an expert meeting convened to consider gaps in knowledge and unmet research needs in terms of (i) formulation and devices, (ii) meaningful product characterization and modeling, (iii) opportunities to modify absorption and clearance. Important research questions were identified in the areas of device and formulation innovation, critical quality attributes for different nasal products, development of nasal casts for drug deposition studies, improved experimental models, the use of simulations and nasal delivery in special populations. We offer these questions as a stimulus to research and suggest that they might be addressed most effectively by collaborative research endeavors.

Comparison of short nozzle and long nozzle spray in sinonasal drug delivery: a cadaveric study

The aim of this study is to compare the delivery site of topical drugs using the short nozzle and the long nozzle. Fourteen fresh frozen cadaver heads were obtained. All cadaver specimens underwent bilateral endoscopic wide maxillary antrostomy, frontal sinusotomy, and complete sphenoethmoidectomy. The right nasal cavity of each cadaver was sprayed with radiolabeled saline using the short nozzle (short nozzle group), while the left nasal cavity was sprayed using the long nozzle (long nozzle group). The distribution of radioactive saline within the sinus cavities was determined using single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. The distribution of the radiolabeled saline in reference with the maxillary line, vestibule, maxillary, ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus was compared between the 2 groups using Fisher exact test. The number of specimens that demonstrated radioactivity above the maxillary line is higher in the long nozzle group (14 cadavers, 100%) compared to short nozzle group (9 cadavers, 64.3%; p = .02). There are fewer specimens that demonstrated deposition of radioactive saline in the vestibule in the long nozzle group (6 cadavers, 42.86%) compared to short nozzle group (13 cadavers, 92.86%; P = .006). Compared to short nozzle group, there are more specimens demonstrating radioactivity in the maxillary, ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus in the long nozzle group, but the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.241, 0.347, 0.126, 0.5). Compared to short nozzle, long nozzle more frequently delivers intranasal drugs beyond the maxillary line and less frequently in the vestibule. These findings support the hypothesis that the use of long and narrow nozzle, instead of the conventional short nozzle, can improve sinonasal drug delivery in post-endoscopic sinus surgery nose.

How to characterize a nasal product. The state of the art of in vitro and ex vivo specific methods

Nasal delivery offers many benefits over other conventional routes of delivery (e.g. oral or intravenous administration). Benefits include, among others, a fast onset of action, non-invasiveness and direct access to the central nervous system. The nasal cavity is not only limited to local application (e.g. rhinosinusitis) but can also provide direct access to other sites in the body (e.g. the central nervous system or systemic circulation). However, both the anatomy and the physiology of the nose impose their own limitations, such as a small volume for delivery or rapid mucociliary clearance. To meet nasal-specific criteria, the formulator has to complete a plethora of tests, in vitro and ex vivo, to assess the efficacy and tolerance of a new drug-delivery system. Moreover, depending on the desired therapeutic effect, the delivery of the drug should target a specific pathway that could potentially be achieved through a modified release of this drug. Therefore, this review focuses on specific techniques that should be performed when a nasal formulation is developed. The review covers both the tests recommended by regulatory agencies (e.g. the Food and Drug Administration) and other complementary experiments frequently performed in the field.

A Novel Simulation-Based Approach for Comparing the Population Against Average Bioequivalence Statistical Test for the Evaluation of Nasal Spray Products on Spray Pattern and Droplet Size Distribution Parameters

The aim of this work is to evaluate average bioequivalence (ABE) and population bioequivalence (PBE) statistical approaches so as to identify which approach is most suitable for in vitro bioequivalence (IVBE) testing of nasal spray products. For droplet size distribution (DSD) and spray pattern (SP), in vitro data were collected using a well-established nasal spray on the market (Nasonex®, manufactured by Merck Sharp & Dohme Limited). Simulations were performed using in vitro data to comparatively investigate ABE and PBE tests. For highly variable parameters such as SP area, this study clearly demonstrates that the level of agreement between ABE and PBE test conclusions is much smaller as compared with that of DSD Dv(50), which was found to have moderate variability. PBE approach dictates equivalence for both means and variances, and was found to handle both SP and DSD parameters with similar passing rates compared to the passing rates from the ABE approach. However, pronounced asymmetric behavior of PBE empirical power curves for highly variable SP area was observed. A modified PBE statistical approach is proposed for DSD span and Dv(50) in vitro parameters, where acceptance criteria would be based on comparison of reference/branded product to itself as part of "pre-IVBE study" via innovative statistical bootstrap simulations. Due to inherent high variability of the SP area parameter driving pronounced asymmetric behavior of PBE power curves, and due to unclear in vivo relevance for SP area and ovality, authors propose that SP parameters be used as development and quality control tools rather than for demonstration of IVBE.