Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Cancer Distress Scales for Adolescent and Young Adults

Emotional Distress, Self-Management Skills, and Expectations Among Adolescents and Young Adult Childhood Cancer Survivors in Transition from Pediatric to Adult Care: A Brief Report

The transition from pediatric to adult care poses several emotional and personal challenges to adolescents and young adult (AYA) childhood cancer survivors (CCSs), which need attention to avoid the risk of nonadherence and medical dropout. This brief report describes the condition of AYA-CCSs at the moment of transition in terms of emotional state, personal autonomy, and expectations regarding future care. The results provide insights for clinicians dealing with survivorship care, to enhance AYA-CCSs emotional resilience and to support them in being in charge of their health, thus facilitating their transition to adulthood.

Age-related differences in symptom distress among patients with cancer

INTRODUCTION

Differences in symptom distress among older (age 65-74) and very old (age 75+) patients with cancer, compared to younger patients, remain to be well explored. These differences are important to understand given the heterogeneity of older populations and may have implications for age-appropriate symptom detection and management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined routinely collected Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised (ESAS-r) scores from 9,143 patients age 40+ initiating chemotherapy for solid malignancies at a single academic cancer centre, between September 2011 and May 2019. We used multivariable logistic regression models to determine associations between the most common symptoms and age group (ages 40-64, 65-74, 75-84, and 85+), cancer site, clinical stage, sex, and income levels. We focused our findings on patients with the five most common cancers, breast (n = 1,532), prostate (n = 923), lung (n = 889), pancreatic (n = 429), and colorectal (n = 368), prior to receiving treatment.

RESULTS

Within our sample, 58.0% were age 40-64, 27.3% age 65-74, 11.8% age 75-84, and 2.9% age 85+. Among the nine symptoms in the ESAS-r (anxiety, depression, tiredness, wellbeing, nausea, pain, drowsiness, appetite, and shortness of breath), the most common symptoms overall were anxiety (moderate-severe scores [ESAS-r 4 or higher] were reported by 33.8% of patients), lack of well-being (38.3%), and tiredness (38.3%). Older age was associated with lower odds of moderate/severe anxiety (odds ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.90 for age 65-74; OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.70-0.93 for age 75-84; OR 0.62, 95%CI 0.47-0.82 for age 85+; referent is 40-64-year-olds for all analyses), and increased odds of tiredness (OR 1.00, 95%CI 0.90-1.11 for age 65-74; OR 1.19, 95%CI 1.04-1.37 for age 75-84; and OR 1.34, 95%CI 1.04-1.72 for age 85+). Advanced stage, female sex, and lower income levels were associated with higher odds of moderate/severe tiredness, anxiety, and lack of well-being in adjusted models. Patients with pancreatic and lung cancers reported worse scores for these three symptoms than patients with other cancers.

DISCUSSION

Older age was associated with differences in symptom experiences such as increased tiredness and reduced anxiety. Supportive care interventions and future research should focus on addressing these symptoms to improve patient quality of life.

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Virtual "Coping with Brain Fog" Intervention for Improving Cognitive Functioning in Young Adults with Cancer

Purpose: Cancer-related cognitive deficits (CRCDs) are common among young adults (YAs) (ages: 18-39) with cancer and can be debilitating. We aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual Coping with Brain Fog intervention among YAs with cancer. Our secondary aims were to explore the intervention's effect on cognitive functioning and psychological distress. Methods: This prospective feasibility study involved eight weekly, 90-minute virtual group sessions. Sessions focused on psychoeducation on CRCD, memory skills, task management, and psychological well-being. The primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability of the intervention evaluated through attendance (>60% not missing >2 consecutive sessions) and satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire [CSQ] score >20). Secondary outcomes included the following: cognitive functioning (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function [FACT-Cog] Scale) and symptoms of distress (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Short Form-Anxiety/Depression/Fatigue) and participants' experiences using semistructured interviews. Paired t-tests and summative content analysis were used for quantitative and qualitative data analyses. Results: Twelve participants (five male, mean age = 33 years) were enrolled. All but one participant met feasibility criteria of not missing >2 consecutive sessions (11/12 = 92%). The mean CSQ score was 28.1 (standard deviation 2.5). Significant improvement in cognitive function as measured by FACT-Cog Scale was observed postintervention (p < 0.05). Ten participants adopted strategies from the program to combat CRCD, and eight reported CRCD symptom improvement. Conclusion: A virtual Coping with Brain Fog intervention is feasible and acceptable for the symptoms of CRCD among YAs with cancer. The exploratory data indicate subjective improvement in cognitive function, and will inform the design and implementation of a future clinical trial. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT05115422.

What does it mean to flourish? Piloting the flourishing measure with adolescents and young adults with mood and anxiety disorders

Introduction: Treatment for adolescents and young adults with mood and anxiety disorders typically focuses on recovery of symptoms and improvement in functioning. Measuring positive states of health-using self-report surveys such as the Flourishing Measure-may help to promote holistic treatment. We piloted the Flourishing Measure-Adolescent Version in a clinical sample of adolescents and young adults with mood and/or anxiety disorders to determine appropriateness and acceptability in this population.Methods: We recruited adolescents (age 12-18) and young adults (age 19-25) with mood and/or anxiety disorders from an outpatient psychiatry clinic associated with an academic hospital. We used cognitive interviewing, a method used in survey development that determines whether respondents' understanding aligns with instrument intention. Participants completed the Flourishing Measure and answered questions about their impressions of items.Results: Sixteen participants (10 adolescents and 6 young adults) participated in the study. Participants generally understood the concept of flourishing and the intention of individual items. The items were generally considered clear and participants offered minor suggestions for improvement in wording of the items.Discussion: Participants in our study understood the meaning of flourishing, as well as individual items in the measure. The Flourishing Measure may be suitable for use in clinical and research settings for adolescents and young adults, though piloting with larger, more diverse samples is needed.

Psychiatric Disorder Incidence Among Adolescents and Young Adults Aged 15-39 With Cancer: Population-Based Cohort

BACKGROUND

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors face physical and psychological sequelae related to having cancer decades after treatment completion. It is unclear if AYA cancer survivors are at increased risk for late psychiatric disorders.

METHODS

We used the Alberta AYA Cancer Survivor Study that includes 5-year survivors of cancer diagnosed at age 15-39 years during 1991 to 2013. The primary outcome was incidence of psychiatric disorder (composite outcome) including anxiety, depressive, trauma- and stressor-related, psychotic, and substance use disorders that were identified using coding algorithms for administrative health databases. A validated coding algorithm identified people who experienced a suicide attempt or event of self-harm. Secondary outcomes were incidences of diagnoses by type of psychiatric disorder.

RESULTS

Among 12 116 AYA 5-year cancer survivors (n = 4634 [38%] males; n = 7482 [62%] females), 7426 (61%; n = 2406 [32%] males; n = 5020 [68%] females) were diagnosed with at least 1 of 5 psychiatric disorders occurring at least 3 years after cancer diagnosis. Survivors of all cancer types were most often diagnosed with anxiety (males: 39.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 37.6% to 40.4%; females: 54.5%, 95% CI = 53.3% to 55.6%), depressive (males: 32.7%, 95% CI = 31.3% to 34.0%; females: 47.0%, 95% CI = 45.8% to 48.1%), and trauma- and stressor-related disorders (males: 13.5%, 95% CI =12.5% to 14.5%; females: 22.5%, 95% CI = 21.6% to 23.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Anxiety, depressive, and trauma- and stressor-related disorders are common among 5-year survivors of AYA cancer. Primary, secondary, or tertiary preventive strategies for AYAs diagnosed with cancer, particularly at an early age, are needed to mitigate risk of potentially severe outcomes because of psychiatric disorders.

The effectiveness of a provincial symptom assessment program in reaching adolescents and young adults with cancer: A population-based cohort study

Background

Symptom control is prioritized by cancer patients and may improve overall survival. Ontario, Canada thus offers all cancer patients screening using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) at outpatient cancer‐related visits. We determined whether this initiative reached adolescents and young adults (AYA) and factors associated with screening in this population.

Methods

We linked all Ontario AYA diagnosed with cancer 2010–2018 aged 15–29 years to population‐based databases identifying outpatient visits and ESAS screening. For each 2‐week period in the year post‐diagnosis, AYA with cancer‐related visits were categorized as “unscreened” (no ESAS score) versus “screened” (≥1 ESAS score). Demographic and disease‐related covariates were examined.

Results

Among 5435 AYA, 4204 (77.4%) had ≥1 ESAS screen. Within any 2‐week period, only 30%–44% of AYA attending cancer‐related visits were screened. Patients with hematologic malignancies were least likely to be screened [odds ratio (OR) vs. breast cancer 0.77, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.67–0.88; p < 0.001]. AYA in remote Northern or rural areas had equivalent or higher rates of ESAS screening compared to those in high‐income urban areas. However, AYA living in the lowest income urban neighborhoods were less likely to be screened (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77–0.97; p = 0.01).

Conclusions

Within a population‐wide symptom assessment program, while AYA living in rural and remote areas had high rates of screening, than those in low‐income urban areas were substantially less likely to be screened. Though patients with hematologic cancers suffer from particularly high symptom burdens, they were also less likely to be screened. Interventions targeting AYA are required to increase uptake.

Screening for distress and needs: Findings from a multinational validation of the Adolescent and Young Adult Psycho-Oncology Screening Tool with newly diagnosed patients

OBJECTIVE

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) diagnosed with cancer commonly experience elevated psychological distress and need appropriate detection and management of the psychosocial impact of their illness and treatment. This paper describes the multinational validation of the Distress Thermometer (DT) for AYAs recently diagnosed with cancer and the relationship between distress and patient concerns on the AYA-Needs Assessment (AYA-NA).

METHODS

AYA patients (N = 288; 15-29 years, M_age  = 21.5 years, SD_age  = 3.8) from Australia (n = 111), Canada (n = 67), the UK (n = 85) and the USA (n = 25) completed the DT, AYA-NA, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) and demographic measures within 3 months of diagnosis. Using the HADS as a criterion, receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off score and meet the acceptable level of 0.70 for sensitivity and specificity. Correlations between the DT and HADS scores, prevalence of distress and AYA-NA scores were reported.

RESULTS

The DT correlated strongly with the HADS-Total, providing construct validity evidence (r = 0.65, p < 0.001). A score of 5 resulted in the best clinical screening cut-off on the DT (sensitivity = 82%, specificity = 75%, Youden Index = 0.57). Forty-two percent of AYAs scored at or above 5. 'Loss of meaning or purpose' was the AYA-NA item most likely to differentiate distressed AYAs.

CONCLUSIONS

The DT is a valid distress screening instrument for AYAs with cancer. The AYA-POST (DT and AYA-NA) provides clinicians with a critical tool to assess the psychosocial well-being of this group, allowing for the provision of personalised support and care responsive to individuals' specific needs and concerns.

Clinical and Demographic Factors Associated with Distress in Adolescent and Young Adults with Cancer

Purpose: Distress in cancer is defined as multifactorial unpleasant experience of an emotional, psychological, social, or spiritual nature that interferes with ones' ability to cope with cancer and its symptoms and treatment. The aim of this study was to determine clinical and demographic factors associated with the presence of distress in adolescent and young adults (AYAs) with cancer. Methods: Data were collected as part of a field-test study conducted between August 2016 and November 2017 in Canada (Toronto, Edmonton, and Vancouver) to determine the reliability and validity of CDS-AYA (Cancer Distress Scales for Adolescent and Young Adults). The CDS-AYA consist of five independently functioning scales including impact of cancer, physical, emotional, cognitive, and cancer worry. Multivariate logistic regression analyses, using established CDS-AYA cut points, were performed to identify clinical and demographic factors associated with the presence of distress in AYAs of ages 15-39 years with cancer. Results: Across all scales, increased distress was associated with female gender (p < 0.05), on-treatment status (p < 0.05), and reported poor overall health (p < 0.001). For the emotional scale, distress was also associated with being of age 15-19 years (p = 0.01). The greatest effect size for all scales was associated with treatment status [exp(β) = 1.78-4.6], except for the cognitive scale where gender had a slightly greater effect size. Conclusion: Factors associated with distress in AYA patients with cancer were similar across five CDS-AYA scales. Although it is important to screen all patients for distress, our findings reveal that patients who are female, on treatment, or who report having poorer health may be at a greater risk.

Evolution of adolescent and young adult oncology in Canada

In the context of cancer, adolescents and young adults [...]