Identification of Type III Interferon (IFN-λ) in Chinese Goose: Gene Structure, Age-Dependent Expression Profile, and Antiviral Immune Characteristics In Vivo and In Vitro

CircMYO1B/miR-155 pathway is a common mechanism of stress-induced immunosuppression affecting immune response to three vaccines in chicken

Stress-induced immunosuppression (SIIS) can weaken the immune response effect of poultry vaccination, and bring huge hidden dangers and economic losses to the poultry industry. However, the detailed molecular mechanisms are still not fully understood. Unveiling the common mechanism of SIIS affecting the immune response to different vaccines is critical for detecting and minimizing the losses caused by SIIS. This study used glucocorticoid dexamethasone (Dex) to simulate SIIS, and three classic avian vaccines (including avian influenza virus (AIV), Newcastle disease virus (NDV), and infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV)) were used to induce immune responses in chicken. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) revealed the expression characteristics and functions of circMYO1B and miR-155 in the processes of SIIS affecting the immune response to the aforementioned avian vaccines, as well as their targeted regulatory relationship. Subsequent bioinformatics analysis predicted FOS, one of the potential target genes of miR-155. The results showed that circMYO1B/miR-155 pathway served as a key common mechanism by which SIIS affected the immune response to the three vaccines. Both heart and proventriculus appeared to be the crucial tissues for this process, with five days post immunization (dpi) emerging as the primary time of interest. Moreover, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling system played a key role in modulating the immune response subsequent to SIIS administration. Our findings provide new insights into the immune function of competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA), which have important function in the detection and treatment of SIIS affecting vaccine immunity.

Evolution of developmental and comparative immunology in poultry: The regulators and the regulated

Avian has a unique immune system that evolved in response to environmental pressures in all aspects of innate and adaptive immune responses, including localized and circulating lymphocytes, diversity of immunoglobulin repertoire, and various cytokines and chemokines. All of these attributes make birds an indispensable vertebrate model for studying the fundamental immunological concepts and comparative immunology. However, research on the immune system in birds lags far behind that of humans, mice, and other agricultural animal species, and limited immune tools have hindered the adequate application of birds as disease models for mammalian systems. An in-depth understanding of the avian immune system relies on the detailed studies of various regulated and regulatory mediators, such as cell surface antigens, cytokines, and chemokines. Here, we review current knowledge centered on the roles of avian cell surface antigens, cytokines, chemokines, and beyond. Moreover, we provide an update on recent progress in this rapidly developing field of study with respect to the availability of immune reagents that will facilitate the study of regulatory and regulated components of poultry immunity. The new information on avian immunity and available immune tools will benefit avian researchers and evolutionary biologists in conducting fundamental and applied research.

Innate Immune Responses to Avian Influenza Viruses in Ducks and Chickens

Mallard ducks are important natural hosts of low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) viruses and many strains circulate in this reservoir and cause little harm. Some strains can be transmitted to other hosts, including chickens, and cause respiratory and systemic disease. Rarely, these highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses cause disease in mallards, while chickens are highly susceptible. The long co-evolution of mallard ducks with influenza viruses has undoubtedly fine-tuned many immunological host–pathogen interactions to confer resistance to disease, which are poorly understood. Here, we compare innate responses to different avian influenza viruses in ducks and chickens to reveal differences that point to potential mechanisms of disease resistance. Mallard ducks are permissive to LPAI replication in their intestinal tissues without overtly compromising their fitness. In contrast, the mallard response to HPAI infection reflects an immediate and robust induction of type I interferon and antiviral interferon stimulated genes, highlighting the importance of the RIG-I pathway. Ducks also appear to limit the duration of the response, particularly of pro-inflammatory cytokine expression. Chickens lack RIG-I, and some modulators of the signaling pathway and may be compromised in initiating an early interferon response, allowing more viral replication and consequent damage. We review current knowledge about innate response mediators to influenza infection in mallard ducks compared to chickens to gain insight into protective immune responses, and open questions for future research.

Cross-species antiviral activity of goose interferon lambda against duck plague virus is related to its positive self-regulatory feedback loop

Duck plague virus (DPV) is a virus of the Herpesviridae family that leads to acute disease with a high mortality rate in ducks. Control of the disease contributes to the development of poultry breeding. Type III IFN family (IFN-λs) is a novel member of the IFN family, and goose IFN-λ (goIFN-λ) is a newly identified gene whose antiviral function has only been investigated to a limited extent. Here, the cross-species antiviral activity of goIFN-λ against DPV in duck embryo fibroblasts (DEFs) was studied. We found that pre-treatment with goIFN-λ greatly increased the expression of IFN-λ in both heterologous DEFs and homologous goose embryo fibroblasts (GEFs), while differentially inducing IFNα- and IFN-stimulated genes. Additionally, a positive self-regulatory feedback loop of goIFN-λ was blocked by a mouse anti-goIFN-λ polyclonal antibody, which was confirmed in both homologous GEFs and goose peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The suppression of the BAC-DPV-EGFP by goIFN-λ in DEFs was confirmed by fluorescence microscopy, flow cytometry (FCM) analysis, viral copies and titre detection, which can be rescued by mouse anti-goIFN-λ polyclonal antibody incubation. Finally, reporter gene assays indicated that the cross-species antiviral activity of goIFN-λ against BAC-DPV-EGFP is related to its positive self-regulatory feedback loop and subsequent ISG induction. Our data shed light on the fundamental mechanisms of goIFN-λ antiviral function in vitro and extend the considerable range of therapeutic applications in multiple-poultry disease.