1
|
Ratzel E, Pretzell IM, Kindler T, Weber M, Gerlach C. Patient Reported Outcome Measurement (PROM) under real-life conditions of non-curable cancer outpatients with the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS) and NCCN-Distress Thermometer - A mixed methods study. PEC INNOVATION 2024; 4:100264. [PMID: 38404931 PMCID: PMC10883829 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Objective Prospective cohort study to test the real-life feasibility of longitudinal patient-reported outcome measurement PROM (Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale IPOS, and NCCN Distress Thermometer DT) required for outpatients with non-curable lung or prostate cancer in comprehensive cancer centers. Methods Assessment with paper-based IPOS and DT was observed for 15 months. We analyzed response to patients' distress (requests for supportive and palliative services) following PROM. Focus groups to comprehensively explore the user experience of patients, informal caregivers and health care professionals (HCP) supplemented the analysis. Results Ninety-seven percent (125/129) of the patients received a questionnaire once, but quarterly assessment as recommended by certification committees was achieved only in 50% and 31% of prostate and lung cancer patients. Although both instruments were well accepted, only IPOS showed a high content validity, because some patients had difficulties in understanding the DT. Patients felt comfortable with completing the PROM, and HCP found PROM helped to structure the patient encounter. Due to organizational deficiencies in the handling of the instruments and operationalization of reactions to identified distress, the referrals to supportive and palliative services were rare. Conclusion To facilitate consequences from PROM it should be a standardized intervention rather than assessment alone. Innovation The patient perspective improves the implementation of PROM under real-life clinical conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen Ratzel
- Interdisciplinary Department of Palliative Care, III. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, Geb. 407, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Ina Maria Pretzell
- University Cancer Center Mainz (UCT Mainz), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Kindler
- University Cancer Center Mainz (UCT Mainz), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Germany
| | - Martin Weber
- Interdisciplinary Department of Palliative Care, III. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, Geb. 407, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Christina Gerlach
- Interdisciplinary Department of Palliative Care, III. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, Geb. 407, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Department of Palliative Care, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 305, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
What do bereaved relatives of cancer patients dying in hospital want to tell us? Analysis of free-text comments from the International Care of the Dying Evaluation (i-CODE) survey: a mixed methods approach. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:81. [PMID: 36562882 PMCID: PMC9788999 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07490-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We conducted an international survey of bereaved relatives of cancer patients dying in hospitals in seven countries, with the aim to assess and improve the quality of care. The survey used the i-CODE (International Care of the Dying Evaluation) questionnaire. Here, we report findings from the free-text comments submitted with the questionnaires. We explored for topic areas which would potentially be important for improving the quality of care. Further, we examined who reported free-texts and in what way, to reduce bias without ignoring the function the free-texts may have for those contributing. METHODS We used a combined qualitative-quantitative approach: logistic regression analysis to study the effect of respondents' socio-demographic characteristics on the probability of free-texts contributions and thematic analysis to understand the free-text meaning. The primary survey outcomes, (1) how frequently the dying person was treated with dignity and respect and (2) support for the relative, were related to free-text content. RESULTS In total, 914 questionnaires were submitted; 457/914 (50%) contained free-text comments. We found no socio-demographic differences between the respondents providing free-texts and those who did not. We discovered different types of free-texts ("feedback," "narrative," "self-revelation") containing themes of which "continuity of care," "the one person who can make a difference," and "the importance of being a companion to the dying" represent care dimensions supplementing the questionnaire items. A free-text type of grateful feedback was associated with well perceived support for the relative. CONCLUSION Bereaved relatives used the free-texts to report details related to i-CODE items and to dimensions otherwise not represented. They highlighted the importance of the perceived support from human interaction between staff and the dying patient and themselves; and that more than professional competence alone, personal, meaningful interactions have profound importance.
Collapse
|
3
|
Laranjeira C, Dixe MA, Martinho R, Rijo R, Querido A. Building Bridges for "Palliative Care-in-Place": Development of a mHealth Intervention for Informal Home Care. Front Psychol 2022; 13:862347. [PMID: 35401349 PMCID: PMC8993184 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In Palliative Care (PC), family and close people are an essential part of provision of care. They assume highly complex tasks for which they are not prepared, with considerable physical, psychological, social and economic impact. Informal Caregivers (ICs) often falter in the final stage of life and develop distress, enhancing emotional burden and complicated grief. The lack of available and accessible in-person counselling resources is often reported by ICs. Online resources can promote early access to help and support for patient-IC dyads in palliative care. The primary aim of this research is to co-design, develop and test the feasibility of the Help2Care-PAL mHealth app that addresses the needs of ICs of palliative patients cared for at home. This Digital Health Intervention (DHI) in palliative care will be used for education, symptom management, communication and decision-making, to enhance Quality of Life (QoL) of patients and ICs, fostering anticipatory grief and the reach and efficiency of services. Methods This study will use an iterative co-design process and convergent mixed-methods design, following the MORECare consensus for developing a complex intervention. Construction of the DHI will follow four main phases: (I) a needs assessment (a cross-sectional survey, individual interviews with ICs and focus groups with professionals with community palliative care experience); (II) design and co-production of mHealth materials and interventions to support ICs; (III) the development of a mHealth app; and (IV) usability and feasibility of the mHealth app. The Help2Care-PAL platform seeks to build resources from the perspectives and needs of both family dyads and nursing professionals working in the field of community palliative care. User-centeredness will be ensured by the active participation of patient-IC dyads and professionals of the palliative care community. Discussion This mixed-method study will offer new insights on needs and expectations of patient-IC dyads and nurses in community palliative care regarding caregiving preparedness and online health resources. Through the implementation of an adaptive digital tool, we aim to improve access to palliative care family support, which is highly linked with the wellbeing of patients and especially new ICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Laranjeira
- School of Health Sciences of Polytechnic of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.,Centre for Innovative Care and Health Technology (ciTechCare), Polytechnic of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.,Research in Education and Community Intervention (RECI I&D), Piaget Institute, Viseu, Portugal
| | - Maria Anjos Dixe
- School of Health Sciences of Polytechnic of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.,Centre for Innovative Care and Health Technology (ciTechCare), Polytechnic of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
| | - Ricardo Martinho
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Technology and Management School of Polytechnic of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
| | - Rui Rijo
- Technology and Management School of Polytechnic of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
| | - Ana Querido
- School of Health Sciences of Polytechnic of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.,Centre for Innovative Care and Health Technology (ciTechCare), Polytechnic of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.,Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Matsuda Y, Yamaguchi T, Matsumoto Y, Ishiki H, Usui Y, Kako J, Suzuki K, Matsunuma R, Mori M, Watanabe H, Zenda S. Research policy in supportive care and palliative care for cancer dyspnea. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021; 52:260-265. [PMID: 34894136 PMCID: PMC8894919 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyab193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dyspnea is a common and distressing symptom in patients with cancer. To improve its management, multicenter confirmatory studies are necessary. Research policy would be useful in conducting these studies. Here, we propose a new research policy for the management of dyspnea in patients with cancer. METHODS The first draft was developed by a policy working group of 11 specialists in the field of supportive care or palliative care for dyspnea. Then, a provisional draft was developed after review by a research support group (the Japanese Supportive, Palliative and Psychosocial Care Study Group) and five Japanese scientific societies (Japanese Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, Japanese Society of Palliative Medicine, Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine and Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology), and receipt of public comments. RESULTS The policy includes the following components of research policy on dyspnea: (i) definition of dyspnea, (ii) scale for assessment of dyspnea, (iii) reason for dyspnea or factors associated with dyspnea and (iv) treatment effectiveness outcomes/adverse events. The final policy (Ver1.0) was completed on 1 March 2021. CONCLUSIONS This policy could help researchers plan and conduct studies on the management of cancer dyspnea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshinobu Matsuda
- Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai, Japan
| | - Takashi Yamaguchi
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Konan Medical Center, Kobe, Japan.,Department of Palliative Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Yoshihisa Matsumoto
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Hiroto Ishiki
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuko Usui
- Division of Palliative Therapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Kako
- College of Nursing Art and Science, University of Hyogo, Akashi, Japan
| | - Kozue Suzuki
- Department of Palliative Care, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryo Matsunuma
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Konan Medical Center, Kobe, Japan.,Department of Palliative Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Masanori Mori
- Palliative and Supportive Care Division, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | | | - Sadamoto Zenda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang GM, Shivanada S, Foo C, Neo SH, Ho S, Yoon S. Experience of Patients in a Consult Model versus an Integrated Palliative Care and Medical Oncology Co-Rounding Model: A Qualitative Study. J Palliat Med 2021; 25:291-295. [PMID: 34748407 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Research on different models of palliative care should include evaluation of the patients' experience of care. Objectives: To understand the patients' experience regarding care received in a consult model versus an integrated palliative care and medical oncology co-rounding model during a hospital admission. Design: Qualitative study using thematic analysis. Setting/Subjects: Seventeen patients with stage 4 solid tumor admitted to a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Results: Although experiences of care during the hospital stay were similar in both models, patients in the integrated model were able to better articulate the benefits of palliative care involvement alongside oncologists-to facilitate better communication and a more holistic understanding of the clinical context, with a view to effectively addressing the patient's needs. Conclusions: An integrated co-rounding model may possibly smoothen the transition for advanced cancer patients to palliative care, and could perhaps be considered for implementation to foster reach of palliative care services and improve patient experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Meijuan Yang
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of General Medicine, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sushma Shivanada
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cherylyn Foo
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shirlyn Huishan Neo
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shirlynn Ho
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sungwon Yoon
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mason S, Ling J, Mosoiu D, Arantzamendi M, Tserkezoglou AJ, Predoiu O, Payne S. Undertaking Research Using Online Nominal Group Technique: Lessons from an International Study (RESPACC). J Palliat Med 2021; 24:1867-1871. [PMID: 34726929 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Nominal group technique (NGT) is a well-established research method for establishing consensus. Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, research methods need to be adapted to engage with participants online. Objective: To determine the feasibility and acceptability of adapting NGT to an online format. Setting: Palliative care clinicians (n = 31) in Greece, Romania, and Spain. Methods: NGT discussions were used to elicit palliative care clinicians' opinions, and to rank priorities regarding their understanding and needs about clinical research. Preliminary online training of country-based facilitators was followed by content analysis of debriefing reports to capture learning related to the online NGT format. Results/Implementation: Three NGT sessions used online platforms (Zoom/MS Office/Mentimeter) for the meetings. Analysis of the facilitator reports generated three themes: preparation/facilitation/timing; optimizing technology; and interactions. Conclusions: Conducting NGT meetings online is viable and may be advantageous when compared with traditional face-to-face meetings, but requires careful preparation for participants to contribute effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Unit, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Julie Ling
- European Association for Palliative Care, Luchthavenlaan, Belgium
| | - Daniela Mosoiu
- Faculty of Medicine, Transilvania University, Brasov, Romania
| | - María Arantzamendi
- Instituto Cultura y Sociedad, ATLANTES, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | | | - Sheila Payne
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sampson EL, Anderson JE, Candy B, Davies N, Ellis-Smith C, Gola A, Harding R, Kenten C, Kupeli N, Mead S, Moore KJ, Omar RZ, Sleeman KE, Stewart R, Ward J, Warren JD, Evans CJ. Empowering Better End-of-Life Dementia Care (EMBED-Care): A mixed methods protocol to achieve integrated person-centred care across settings. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2020; 35:820-832. [PMID: 31854477 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Globally, the number of people with dementia who have palliative care needs will increase fourfold over the next 40 years. The Empowering Better End-of-Life Dementia Care (EMBED-Care) Programme aims to deliver a step change in care through a large sequential study, spanning multiple work streams. METHODS We will use mixed methods across settings where people with dementia live and die: their own homes, care homes, and hospitals. Beginning with policy syntheses and reviews of interventions, we will develop a conceptual framework and underpinning theory of change. We will use linked data sets to explore current service use, care transitions, and inequalities and predict future need for end-of-life dementia care. Longitudinal cohort studies of people with dementia (including young onset and prion dementias) and their carers will describe care transitions, quality of life, symptoms, formal and informal care provision, and costs. Data will be synthesised, underpinned by the Knowledge-to-Action Implementation Framework, to design a novel complex intervention to support assessment, decision making, and communication between patients, carers, and inter-professional teams. This will be feasibility and pilot tested in UK settings. Patient and public involvement and engagement, innovative work with artists, policymakers, and third sector organisations are embedded to drive impact. We will build research capacity and develop an international network for excellence in dementia palliative care. CONCLUSIONS EMBED-Care will help us understand current and future need, develop novel cost-effective care innovations, build research capacity, and promote international collaborations in research and practice to ensure people live and die well with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth L Sampson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.,Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust Liaison Psychiatry Team, North Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK
| | - Janet E Anderson
- Department of Adult Nursing, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Bridget Candy
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nathan Davies
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.,Centre for Population Ageing Studies, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Clare Ellis-Smith
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Anna Gola
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Richard Harding
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Kenten
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nuriye Kupeli
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Simon Mead
- National Prion Clinic, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,MRC Prion Unit at UCL, Institute of Prion Diseases, UCL, London, UK
| | - Kirsten J Moore
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rumana Z Omar
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Katherine E Sleeman
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Robert Stewart
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jane Ward
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jason D Warren
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Catherine J Evans
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.,Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
A Methodological Review of Mixed Methods Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Care (2014-2019). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17113853. [PMID: 32485830 PMCID: PMC7312170 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17113853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Mixed methods research has been increasingly recognized as a useful approach for describing and explaining complex issues in palliative care and end-of-life research. However, little is known about the use of this methodology in the field and the ways in which mixed methods studies have been reported. The purpose of this methodological review was to examine the characteristics, methodological features and reporting quality of mixed methods articles published in palliative care research. The authors screened all articles published in eight journals specialized in palliative care between January 2014 and April 2019. Those that reported a mixed methods study (n = 159) were included. The Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) criteria were used to assess reporting quality. Findings showed that 57.9% of the identified studies used a convergent design and 82.4% mentioned complementarity as their main purpose for using a mixed methods approach. The reporting quality of the articles generally showed a need for improvement as authors usually did not describe the type of mixed methods design used and provided little detail on the integration of quantitative and qualitative methods. Based on the findings, recommendations are made to improve the quality of reporting of mixed methods articles in palliative care.
Collapse
|
9
|
Yorganci E, Evans CJ, Johnson H, Barclay S, Murtagh FE, Yi D, Gao W, Pickles A, Koffman J. Understanding usual care in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions: A multi-method approach. Palliat Med 2020; 34:667-679. [PMID: 32081088 PMCID: PMC7238505 DOI: 10.1177/0269216320905064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evaluations of complex interventions compared to usual care provided in palliative care are increasing. Not describing usual care may affect the interpretation of an intervention's effectiveness, yet how it can be described remains unclear. AIM To demonstrate the feasibility of using multi-methods to describe usual care provided in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of complex interventions, shown within a feasibility cluster RCT. DESIGN Multi-method approach comprising usual care questionnaires, baseline case note review and focus groups with ward staff completed at study end. Thematic analysis of qualitative data, descriptive statistics of quantitative data, followed by methodological triangulation to appraise approach in relation to study aim. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Four general medical wards chosen from UK hospitals. Purposive sampling of healthcare professionals for usual care questionnaires, and focus groups. Review of 20 patients' notes from each ward who died during admission or within 100 days of discharge. RESULTS Twenty-three usual care questionnaires at baseline, two focus groups comprising 20 healthcare professionals and 80 case note reviews. Triangulation of findings resulted in understanding the usual care provided to the targeted population in terms of context, structures, processes and outcomes for patients, families and healthcare professionals. Usual care was described, highlighting (1) similarities and embedded practices, (2) heterogeneity and (3) subtle changes in care during the trial within and across sites. CONCLUSIONS We provide a feasible approach to defining usual care that can be practically adopted in different settings. Understanding usual care enhances the reliability of tested complex interventions, and informs research and policy priorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emel Yorganci
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Catherine J Evans
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.,Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton General Hospital, Brighton, UK
| | - Halle Johnson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Barclay
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fliss Em Murtagh
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.,Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Deokhee Yi
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Wei Gao
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew Pickles
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Koffman
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Breen LJ, Johnson AR, O'Connor M, Howting D, Aoun SM. Challenges in Palliative Care Research on Family Caregivers: Who Volunteers for Interviews? J Palliat Med 2020; 24:112-115. [PMID: 32255736 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Interviews are a common method of data collection in palliative care research because they facilitate the gathering of rich, experiential data that are important for theory and practice. What is less clear is the extent to which those interviewed are representative of the larger group. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine if family caregivers who volunteer to be interviewed were similar or different to those who do not. Design: This study used data from the Caregiving and Bereavement study, a prospective, longitudinal mixed-methods study of family caregivers' general health, quality of life, and grief. Setting/Subjects: The 16 caregivers who volunteered to be interviewed were compared to the 20 who did not. Measurements: Comparisons were made in terms of the caregivers' demographic characteristics as well as measures of their quality of life, general health, general grief, and caregiver prolonged grief (i.e., before death). Results: Compared to caregivers who did not volunteer for an interview, those who volunteered were significantly older and reported less caregiver prolonged grief. Logistic regression showed that for each 1-unit increase in the caregiver prolonged grief score, individuals were 13% less likely to agree to an interview. Conclusions: Research findings based upon family caregivers who volunteer for research interviews might not provide a full picture of their experiences and needs. Researchers are encouraged to consider strategies that sample broadly and promote the participation of the full range of family caregivers in research to address the neglected areas of pre- and postdeath bereavement care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren J Breen
- School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Andrew R Johnson
- School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Moira O'Connor
- School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Denise Howting
- Centre for Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Samar M Aoun
- Public Health Palliative Care Unit, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rotar Pavlič D, Aarendonk D, Wens J, Rodrigues Simões JA, Lynch M, Murray S. Palliative care in primary care: European Forum for Primary Care position paper. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2019; 20:e133. [PMID: 31530333 PMCID: PMC6764185 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423619000641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The aim of this position paper is to assist primary health care (PHC) providers, policymakers, and researchers by discussing the current context in which palliative health care functions within PHC in Europe. The position paper gives examples for improvements to palliative care models from studies and international discussions at European Forum for Primary Care (EFPC) workshops and conferences. BACKGROUND Palliative care is a holistic approach that improves the quality of life of patients and their families facing problems associated with terminal illness, through the prevention and relief of suffering by means of early identification and diligent assessment and treatment of pain and other problems, whether physical, psychosocial, or spiritual. Unfortunately, some Europeans, unless they have cancer, still do not have access to generalist or specialist palliative care. METHODS A draft of this position paper was distributed electronically through the EFPC network in 2015, 2016, and 2017. Active collaboration with the representatives of the International Primary Palliative Care Network was established from the very beginning and more recently with the EAPC Primary Care Reference Group. Barriers, opportunities, and examples of good and bad practices were discussed at workshops focusing on palliative care at the international conferences of Southeastern European countries in Ljubljana (2015) and Budva (2017), at regular conferences in Amsterdam (2015) and Riga (2016), at the WONCA Europe conferences in Istanbul (2015), Copenhagen (2016), and Prague (2017), and at the EAPC conference in Madrid (2017). FINDINGS There is great diversity in the extent and type of palliative care provided in primary care by European countries. Primary care teams (PCTs) are well placed to encourage timely palliative care. We collected examples from different countries. We found numerous barriers influencing PCTs in preparing care plans with patients. We identified many facilitators to improve the organization of palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danica Rotar Pavlič
- Assistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Johan Wens
- Professor of General Practice/Family Medicine, Senior University Lecturer, Research director, Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | | | - Marie Lynch
- Programme Development Manager, The Irish Hospice Foundation, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Scott Murray
- St Columba’s Hospice Professor of Primary Palliative Care, University of Edinburgh and Co-Chair, European Association of Palliative Care Primary Care Reference Group, Emeritus Professor of Primary Palliative Care, University of Edinburgh,Edinburgh, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Maddocks M, Brighton LJ, Farquhar M, Booth S, Miller S, Klass L, Tunnard I, Yi D, Gao W, Bajwah S, Man WDC, Higginson IJ. Holistic services for people with advanced disease and chronic or refractory breathlessness: a mixed-methods evidence synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2019. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr07220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background
Breathlessness is a common and distressing symptom of many advanced diseases, affecting around 2 million people in the UK. Breathlessness increases with disease progression and often becomes chronic or refractory. Breathlessness-triggered services that integrate holistic assessment and specialist palliative care input as part of a multiprofessional approach have been developed for this group, offering tailored interventions to support self-management and reduce distress.
Objectives
The aim was to synthesise evidence on holistic breathlessness services for people with advanced disease and chronic or refractory breathlessness. The objectives were to describe the structure, organisation and delivery of services, determine clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability, identify predictors of treatment response, and elicit stakeholders’ evidence-based priorities for clinical practice, policy and research.
Design
The mixed-methods evidence synthesis comprised three components: (1) a systematic review to determine the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of holistic breathlessness services; (2) a secondary analysis of pooled individual data from three trials to determine predictors of clinical response; and (3) a transparent expert consultation (TEC), comprising a stakeholder workshop and an online consensus survey, to identify stakeholders’ priorities.
Results
Thirty-seven papers reporting on 18 holistic breathlessness services were included in the systematic review. Most studies enrolled people with thoracic cancer, were delivered over 4–6 weeks, and included breathing training, relaxation techniques and psychological support. Meta-analysis demonstrated significant reductions in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) distress due to breathlessness, significant reductions in the Hospital Anxiety and Depressions Scale (HADS) depression scores, and non-significant reductions in the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) mastery and HADS anxiety, favouring the intervention. Recipients valued education, self-management interventions, and expertise of the staff in breathlessness and person-centred care. Evidence for cost-effectiveness was limited and inconclusive. The responder analysis (n = 259) revealed baseline CRQ mastery and NRS distress to be strong predictors of the response to breathlessness services assessed by these same measures, and no significant influence from baseline breathlessness intensity, patient diagnosis, lung function, health status, anxiety or depression. The TEC elicited 34 priorities from stakeholders. Seven priorities received high agreement and consensus, reflecting stakeholders’ (n = 74) views that services should be person-centred and multiprofessional, share their breathlessness management skills with others, and recognise the roles and support needs of informal carers.
Limitations
The evidence synthesis draws predominantly from UK services and may not be generalisable to other settings. Some meta-analyses were restricted by reporting biases and statistical heterogeneity.
Conclusions
Despite heterogeneity in composition and delivery, holistic breathlessness services are highly valued by recipients and can lead to significant improvements in the distress caused by breathlessness and depression. Outcomes of improved mastery and reduced distress caused by breathlessness are not influenced by patient diagnosis, lung function or health status. Stakeholders highlighted the need for improved access to person-centred, multiprofessional breathlessness services and support for informal carers.
Future work
Our research suggests that key therapeutic components of holistic breathlessness services be considered in clinical practice and models of delivery and educational strategies to address stakeholders’ priorities tested.
Study registration
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017057508.
Funding
The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery programme. Matthew Maddocks, Wei Gao and Irene J Higginson are supported by the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) South London; Matthew Maddocks is supported by a NIHR Career Development Fellowship (CDF-2017-009), William D-C Man is supported by the NIHR CLAHRC Northwest London and Irene J Higginson holds a NIHR Emeritus Senior Investigator Award.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Maddocks
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Lisa Jane Brighton
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Morag Farquhar
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Sara Booth
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sophie Miller
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Lara Klass
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - India Tunnard
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Deokhee Yi
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Wei Gao
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sabrina Bajwah
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - William D-C Man
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Harefield Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Muscle Research Laboratory, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rathnayake S, Moyle W, Jones CJ, Calleja P. Development of an mHealth application for family carers of people with dementia: A study protocol. Collegian 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.colegn.2018.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
14
|
Brighton LJ, Tunnard I, Farquhar M, Booth S, Miller S, Yi D, Gao W, Bajwah S, Man WDC, Reilly CC, Ogden M, Bailey S, Ewart C, Higginson IJ, Maddocks M. Recommendations for services for people living with chronic breathlessness in advanced disease: Results of a transparent expert consultation. Chron Respir Dis 2019; 16:1479973118816448. [PMID: 30789022 PMCID: PMC6313262 DOI: 10.1177/1479973118816448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 10/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic breathlessness is highly distressing for people with advanced disease and their informal carers, yet health services for this group remain highly heterogeneous. We aimed to generate evidence-based stakeholder-endorsed recommendations for practice, policy and research concerning services for people with advanced disease and chronic breathlessness. We used transparent expert consultation, comprising modified nominal group technique during a stakeholder workshop, and an online consensus survey. Stakeholders, representing multiple specialities and professions, and patient/carers were invited to participate. Thirty-seven participants attended the stakeholder workshop and generated 34 separate recommendations, rated by 74 online survey respondents. Seven recommendations had strong agreement and high levels of consensus. Stakeholders agreed services should be person-centred and flexible, should cut across multiple disciplines and providers and should prioritize breathlessness management in its own right. They advocated for wide geographical coverage and access to expert care, supported through skills-sharing among professionals. They also recommended recognition of informal carers and their role by clinicians and policymakers. Overall, stakeholders' recommendations reflect the need for improved access to person-centred, multi-professional care and support for carers to provide or access breathlessness management interventions. Future research should test the optimal models of care and educational strategies to meet these recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Jane Brighton
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - India Tunnard
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Morag Farquhar
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich,
UK
| | - Sara Booth
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sophie Miller
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Deokhee Yi
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Wei Gao
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sabrina Bajwah
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - William DC Man
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London,
UK
- Harefield Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Muscle Research Laboratory,
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Charles C Reilly
- Department of Physiotherapy, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation
Trust, London, UK
| | - Margaret Ogden
- Cicely Saunders Institute Patient and Public Involvement Group,
King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sylvia Bailey
- Cicely Saunders Institute Patient and Public Involvement Group,
King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Colleen Ewart
- Cicely Saunders Institute Patient and Public Involvement Group,
King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew Maddocks
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Integration of oncology and palliative care: less-mentioned issues and a Japanese perspective. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:e570-e571. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30486-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2018] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
16
|
Siegle A, Villalobos M, Bossert J, Krug K, Hagelskamp L, Krisam J, Handtke V, Deis N, Jünger J, Wensing M, Thomas M. The Heidelberg Milestones Communication Approach (MCA) for patients with prognosis <12 months: protocol for a mixed-methods study including a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2018; 19:438. [PMID: 30107809 PMCID: PMC6092809 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2814-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Accepted: 07/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The care needs of patients with a limited prognosis (<12 months median) are complex and dynamic. Patients and caregivers must cope with many challenges, including physical symptoms and disabilities, uncertainty. and compromised self-efficacy. Healthcare is often characterized by disruptions in the transition between healthcare providers. The Milestones Communication Approach (MCA) is a structured, proactive, interprofessional concept that involves physicians and nurses and is aimed at providing coherent care across the disease trajectory. This study aims to evaluate these aspects of MCA: (1) the training of healthcare professionals, (2) implementation context and outcomes, (3) patient outcomes, and (4) effects on interprofessional collaboration. Methods/design A multiphase mixed-methods design will be used for the study. A total of 100 patients and 120 healthcare professionals in a specialized oncology hospital will be involved. The training outcomes will be documented using a questionnaire. Implementation context and outcomes will be explored through semi-structured interviews and written questionnaires with healthcare professionals and with the training participants and through a content analysis of patient files. Patient outcomes will be assessed in a pragmatic non-blinded randomized controlled trial and in qualitative interviews with patients and caregivers. Trial outcomes are supportive care needs (SCNS-SF34-G), quality of life (SeiQol and Fact-L), depression and anxiety symptoms (PHQ-4), and distress (Distress Thermometer). Qualitative semi-structured interviews on patients’ views will focus on shared decision-making, communication needs, feeling empathy, and further utilization of healthcare services. Interprofessional collaboration will be explored using the UWE-IP-D before the implementation of MCA (t0) and after 3 (t1), 9 (t2), and 12 (t3) months. Discussion Using guideline-concordant early palliative care, MCA aims to foster patient-centered communication with shared decision-making and facilitation of advance care planning including end-of-life decisions, thus increasing patient quality of life and decreasing aggressive medical care at the end of life. It is assumed that the communication skills training and interprofessional coaching will improve the communication behavior of healthcare providers and influence team communications and team processes. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00013649 and DRKS00013469. Registered on 22 December 2017. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2814-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Siegle
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg University Hospital, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Röntgenstraße 1, D-69126, Heidelberg, Germany. .,German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Matthias Villalobos
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg University Hospital, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Röntgenstraße 1, D-69126, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jasmin Bossert
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katja Krug
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laura Hagelskamp
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg University Hospital, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Röntgenstraße 1, D-69126, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Krisam
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Violet Handtke
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg University Hospital, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Röntgenstraße 1, D-69126, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nicole Deis
- The German National Institute for State Examinations in Medicine, Pharmacy and Psychotherapy, Große Langgasse 8, 55116, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jana Jünger
- The German National Institute for State Examinations in Medicine, Pharmacy and Psychotherapy, Große Langgasse 8, 55116, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michel Wensing
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Thomas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg University Hospital, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Röntgenstraße 1, D-69126, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kinley J, Preston N, Froggatt K. Facilitation of an end-of-life care programme into practice within UK nursing care homes: A mixed-methods study. Int J Nurs Stud 2018; 82:1-10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Revised: 02/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/21/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
18
|
Grande GE, Austin L, Ewing G, O'Leary N, Roberts C. Assessing the impact of a Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) intervention in palliative home care: a stepped wedge cluster trial. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2017; 7:326-334. [PMID: 26719349 PMCID: PMC5574387 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2015] [Revised: 09/02/2015] [Accepted: 11/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To test the impact on family carers of a Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) intervention to facilitate carer-led assessment and support during end of life care. METHOD Mixed method, part-randomised, stepped wedge cluster trial with 6 palliative home care services comparing carers receiving the intervention with those receiving standard care. Postal survey with carers 4-5 months postbereavement measured adequacy of end of life support, current mental and physical health (Short Form 12 Health Survey SF-12), level of grief (Texas Revised Inventory of Grief, TRIG) and distress (Distress Thermometer, DT), place of death and carer satisfaction with place of death. RESULTS Surveys were sent to 3260 (76%) carers of 4311 deceased patients; 681 (21%) were returned (N=333 control, N=348 intervention). Compared with controls, intervention carers had significantly lower levels of early grief, better psychological and physical health, were more likely to feel the place of death was right, and patients were more likely to die at home. However, differences were small and process measures showed low level of implementation, indicating differences may partially relate to increased awareness of carer issues rather than a direct impact of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS Carers had better outcomes in the intervention condition, albeit modest. If this can be achieved through low level implementation and awareness raising of carers' needs from implementation activities, substantial impact should be possible if the CSNAT intervention can be fully implemented with a majority of carers. The study illustrates challenges of implementing and testing a complex intervention in real-life practice and of achieving comprehensive carer assessment and support in line with government recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunn Eli Grande
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lynn Austin
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gail Ewing
- Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Neil O'Leary
- Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Chris Roberts
- Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lewis NV, Larkins C, Stanley N, Szilassy E, Turner W, Drinkwater J, Feder GS. Training on domestic violence and child safeguarding in general practice: a mixed method evaluation of a pilot intervention. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2017; 18:33. [PMID: 28259143 PMCID: PMC5336644 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-017-0603-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2015] [Accepted: 02/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Children’s exposure to domestic violence is a type of child maltreatment, yet many general practice clinicians remain uncertain of their child safeguarding responsibilities in the context of domestic violence. We developed an evidence-based pilot training on domestic violence and child safeguarding for general practice teams. The aim of this study was to test and evaluate its feasibility, acceptability and the direction of change in short-term outcome measures. Methods We used a mixed method design which included a pre-post questionnaire survey, qualitative analysis of free-text comments, training observations, and post-training interviews with trainers and participants. The questionnaire survey used a validated scale to measure participants’ knowledge, confidence/ self-efficacy, and beliefs/ attitudes towards domestic violence and child safeguarding in the context of domestic violence. Results Eleven UK general practices were recruited (response rate 55%) and 88 clinicians attended the pilot training. Thirty-seven participants (42%) completed all pre-post questionnaires and nine were interviewed. All training sessions were observed. All six trainers were interviewed. General practice clinicians valued the training materials and teaching styles, opportunities for reflection and delivery by local trainers from both health and children’s social services. The training elicited positive changes in total outcome score and knowledge and confidence/ self-efficacy sub scores which remained at 3-month follow up. However, the mean sub score of beliefs and attitudes did not change and the qualitative results were mixed. Two interviewees described changes in their clinical practice. Participants’ suggestions for improving the training included incorporating more ethnic and class diversity in the material, using cases with multiple socio economic disadvantages, and addressing multi-agency collaboration in the context of changing and under-resourced services for children. Conclusions The pilot training for general practice on child safeguarding in the context of domestic violence was feasible and acceptable. It elicited positive changes in clinicians’ knowledge and confidence/ self-esteem. The extent to which clinical behaviour changed is unclear, but there are indications of changes in practice by some clinicians. The pilot training requires further refinement and evaluation before implementation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-017-0603-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia V Lewis
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Cath Larkins
- School of Social Work, Care and Community, University of Central Lancashire, Harrington Building, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK
| | - Nicky Stanley
- School of Social Work, Care and Community, University of Central Lancashire, Harrington Building, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK
| | - Eszter Szilassy
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - William Turner
- School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Social Science Complex, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK
| | - Jessica Drinkwater
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9LJ, UK
| | - Gene S Feder
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
There has been a paradigm shift in medicine away from tradition, anecdote and theoretical reasoning from the basic sciences towards evidence-based medicine (EBM). In palliative care however, statistically significant benefits may be marginal and may not be related to clinical meaningfulness. The typical treatment vs. placebo comparison necessitated by ‘gold standard’ randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not necessarily applicable. The complex multimorbidity of end of life care involves considerations of the patient’s physical, psychological, social and spiritual needs. In addition, the field of palliative care covers a heterogeneous group of chronic and incurable diseases no longer limited to cancer. Adequate sample sizes can be difficult to achieve, reducing the power of studies and high attrition rates can result in inadequate follow up periods. This review uses examples of the management of cancer-related fatigue and death rattle (noisy breathing) to demonstrate the current state of EBM in palliative care. The future of EBM in palliative care needs to be as diverse as the patients who ultimately derive benefit. Non-RCT methodologies of equivalent quality, validity and size conducted by collaborative research networks using a ‘mixed methods approach’ are likely to pose the correct clinical questions and derive evidence-based yet clinically relevant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Visser
- 1 Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK ; 2 Sir Michael Sobell House, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Gina Hadley
- 1 Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK ; 2 Sir Michael Sobell House, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Bee Wee
- 1 Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK ; 2 Sir Michael Sobell House, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Leysen B, Van den Eynden B, Gielen B, Bastiaens H, Wens J. Implementation of a Care Pathway for Primary Palliative Care in 5 research clusters in Belgium: quasi-experimental study protocol and innovations in data collection (pro-SPINOZA). BMC Palliat Care 2015; 14:46. [PMID: 26416574 PMCID: PMC4585994 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-015-0043-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Starting with early identification of palliative care patients by general practitioners (GPs), the Care Pathway for Primary Palliative Care (CPPPC) is believed to help primary health care workers to deliver patient- and family-centered care in the last year of life. The care pathway has been pilot-tested, and will now be implemented in 5 Belgian regions: 2 Dutch-speaking regions, 2 French-speaking regions and the bilingual capital region of Brussels. The overall aim of the CPPPC is to provide better quality of primary palliative care, and in the end to reduce the hospital death rate. The aim of this article is to describe the quantitative design and innovative data collection strategy used in the evaluation of this complex intervention. METHODS/DESIGN A quasi-experimental stepped wedge cluster design is set up with the 5 regions being 5 non-randomized clusters. The primary outcome is reduced hospital death rate per GPs' patient population. Secondary outcomes are increased death at home and health care consumption patterns suggesting high quality palliative care. Per research cluster, GPs will be recruited via convenience sampling. These GPs -volunteering to be involved will recruit people with reduced life expectancy and their informal care givers. Health care consumption data in the last year of life, available for all deceased people having lived in the research clusters in the study period, will be used for comparison between patient populations of participating GPs and patient populations of non-participating GPs. Description of baseline characteristics of participating GPs and patients and monitoring of the level of involvement by GPs, patients and informal care givers will happen through regular, privacy-secured web-surveys. Web-survey data and health consumption data are linked in a secure way, respecting Belgian privacy laws. DISCUSSION To evaluate this complex intervention, a quasi-experimental stepped wedge cluster design has been set up. Context characteristics and involvement level of participants are important parameters in evaluating complex interventions. It is possible to securely link survey data with health consumption data. By appealing to IT solutions we hope to be able to partly reduce respondent burden, a known problem in palliative care research. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02266069.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bert Leysen
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Antwerp, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium.
| | - Bart Van den Eynden
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Antwerp, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium.
- Centre for Palliative Care Sint-Camillus, Oosterveldlaan 24, Antwerp, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium.
| | - Birgit Gielen
- InterMutualistic Agency, Tervurenlaan, 188/A, Brussels, 1150, Belgium.
| | - Hilde Bastiaens
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Antwerp, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium.
| | - Johan Wens
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Antwerp, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hernández-Marrero P, Pereira SM, Carvalho AS. Ethical Decisions in Palliative Care: Interprofessional Relations as a Burnout Protective Factor? Results From a Mixed-Methods Multicenter Study in Portugal. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2015; 33:723-32. [PMID: 25926435 DOI: 10.1177/1049909115583486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ethical decisions are part of contemporary practices in palliative care. The need of making such decisions is associated to higher burnout levels and other work related problems among healthcare professionals. AIMS As part of the project entitled "Decisions in End-of-Life Care in Spain and Portugal" (DELiCaSP), this study aims to (i) identify the most common ethical decisions made by Portuguese palliative care teams and (ii) understand how the making of such decisions relates to burnout. METHODS A mixed methods study was conducted with 9 palliative care teams, using (i) questionnaires of socio-demographic and professional variables, work-related experiences, (ii) the Maslach Burnout Inventory, (iii) interviews and (iv) observations. These teams were geographically dispersed across the country, covering the North, Centrum and South regions, and heterogeneous: Five palliative care units for inpatients; three home care teams; and one hospital support team. A total of 20 interviews and 240 hours of observations were completed until reaching saturation. RESULTS The most common ethical decisions were related to communication issues (information disclosure of the diagnosis and prognosis), forgoing treatment and sedation. Although perceived as stressful, emotionally demanding and challenging, ethical decisions were not significantly associated with burnout. CONCLUSIONS Making ethical decisions is not associated with higher burnout levels among professionals working in Portuguese palliative care teams. This can be explained by the interprofessional decision-making process followed by these teams, which promotes a sense of shared-decision and team-based empowerment; and by the advanced level of interdisciplinary education in palliative care that these professionals have.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Hernández-Marrero
- Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Enfermería, Las Palmas, Spain Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Instituto de Bioética, Gabinete de Investigação em Bioética, Porto, Portugal
| | - Sandra Martins Pereira
- Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Instituto de Bioética, Gabinete de Investigação em Bioética, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Selman L, McDermott K, Donesky D, Citron T, Howie-Esquivel J. Appropriateness and acceptability of a Tele-Yoga intervention for people with heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: qualitative findings from a controlled pilot study. BMC COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2015; 15:21. [PMID: 25887324 PMCID: PMC4324792 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-015-0540-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2014] [Accepted: 01/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heart failure (HF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are highly prevalent and associated with a large symptom burden, that is compounded in a dual HF-COPD diagnosis. Yoga has potential benefit for symptom relief; however functional impairment hinders access to usual yoga classes. We developed a Tele-Yoga intervention and evaluated it in a controlled pilot trial. This paper reports on the appropriateness and acceptability of the intervention and the evaluation design. METHODS A controlled, non-randomised trial was conducted of an 8-week Tele-Yoga intervention versus an educational control (information leaflets mailed to participants with one phone call a week). Biweekly one-hour Tele-Yoga classes were implemented via multipoint videoconferencing that connected participants to live classes via an Internet connection to their televisions. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with participants post study exit to explore reasons for and experiences of participating, including views of study outcome measures and physiological tests. Transcribed interviews were analysed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS Fifteen people participated in the pilot study (7 in the intervention group, 8 in the control). Of these, 12 participants were interviewed, 6 in each group, mean age 71.2 years (SD 10.09); 3 were male. Themes are reported in the following categories: acceptability and appropriateness of the intervention, potential active ingredients of the intervention, acceptability and appropriateness of the control, participation in the research, and acceptability of the testing procedures. The intervention was acceptable and appropriate: the intervention group reported enjoying yoga and valuing the home-based aspect and participants described a high symptom burden and social isolation. However, technological problems resulted in poor video-streaming quality for some participants. Potential active ingredients included physical postures, breathing exercises and guidance in relaxation and meditation. The educational control intervention was acceptable and appropriate, with participants reporting little effect on their well-being and no impact on mechanisms hypothesised to explain yoga's effectiveness. The questionnaires and home physiological testing were acceptable to participants. CONCLUSIONS Tele-Yoga is an acceptable and appropriate intervention in people with HF and COPD and further research is warranted to refine the technology used in its delivery. Findings provide guidance for researchers working in tele-interventions, yoga, and similar populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02078739 (4 March 2014).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Selman
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, U.K.
| | - Kelly McDermott
- University of California, San Francisco, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, 1545 Divisadero Street, 4th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94115-3010, U.S.A.
| | - DorAnne Donesky
- Department of Physiological Nursing, UCSF School of Nursing Building, University of California, San Francisco, 2 Koret Way, Box 0610, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0610, U.S.A.
| | - Tracie Citron
- Department of Physiological Nursing, UCSF School of Nursing Building, University of California, San Francisco, 2 Koret Way, Box 0610, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0610, U.S.A.
| | - Jill Howie-Esquivel
- Department of Physiological Nursing, UCSF School of Nursing Building, University of California, San Francisco, 2 Koret Way, Box 0610, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0610, U.S.A.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
|