1
|
Tsang M, Bergerot C, Dhawan N, Patel R, Burbage D, Zhang T, Al-Mondhiry J, McCollom J, Sedhom R. Transformative Peer Connections: Early Experiences From the ASCO Palliative Care Community of Practice. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e100047. [PMID: 38772001 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_100047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
The integration of palliative care into routine oncology practice is the standard of care by most leading cancer organizations. Palliative medicine helps to deliver higher quality of care at a lower cost. However, there are barriers to implementing palliative oncology at many institutions for myriad reasons. In this article, we discuss an innovative strategy that ASCO implemented called the Communities of Practice (CoP). We share our experiences as the Palliative Care CoP and how our group seeks to develop processes and structures to collectively promote systemic change and enhance palliative care delivery for people with cancer. Our Palliative Care CoP engages with senior leaders, administrators, and those in power to achieve a shared vision of delivering holistic health care for people with serious illness. We continue to evolve to meet our members' growing needs by addressing eight main domains: (1) increasing palliative care education and resources; (2) creating opportunities for global palliative care research; (3) providing peer mentorship and community building; (4) engaging with patient advocates; (5) supporting and developing interdisciplinary teams; (6) assisting with professional development and identity formation, especially for trainees and early career faculty; (7) extending our outreach through social media; and (8) enhancing the clinical practice of palliative oncology. The ASCO CoP has been a vital forum to realize ASCO's mission of conquering cancer and advancing the Art and Science of Cancer Care: From Comfort to Cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mazie Tsang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Cristiane Bergerot
- Oncoclínicas&Co-Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Sao Paulo, Brazil and Jersey City, NJ
| | - Natasha Dhawan
- Bronson Oncology and Hematology Specialists, Kalamazoo, MI
| | - Rushil Patel
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL
| | - Darcy Burbage
- Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist/Consultant, Newark, DE
- Clinical Nurse Specialist/Consulting Associate, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC
| | | | - Jafar Al-Mondhiry
- Inova Schar Cancer Institute, University of Virginia, Inova Campus, Fairfax, VA
| | - Joseph McCollom
- Parkview Packnett Family Cancer Institute, Parkview Health System, Fort Wayne, IN
| | - Ramy Sedhom
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dunleavy L, Preston N, Walshe C. Health care professional recruitment of patients and family carers to palliative care randomised controlled trials: A qualitative multiple case study. Palliat Med 2023; 37:1540-1553. [PMID: 37753865 PMCID: PMC10657513 DOI: 10.1177/02692163231197917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trial participant recruitment is an interactional process between health care professionals, patients and carers. Little is known about how clinicians carry out this role in palliative care trials and the reasons why they do or do not recruit participants. AIMS To explore how clinicians recruit to palliative care trials, why they choose to implement particular recruitment strategies, and the factors that influence their choices. DESIGN A qualitative multiple case study of three UK palliative care trials. Data collection included interviews and study documentation. Analysis involved developing and refining theoretical propositions, guided by the '6Ps' of the 'Social Marketing Mix Framework' as an a priori framework (identifying participants, product, price, place, promotion and working with partners). Framework Analysis guided within and then cross-case analysis. SETTINGS/PARTICIPANTS Study investigators and research staff (n = 3, 9, 7) from trial coordinating centres and recruitment sites (hospice and hospital). RESULTS Cross-case analysis suggests the 'Social Marketing Mix Framework' is useful for understanding recruitment processes but wider contextual issues need to be incorporated. These include the 'emotional labour' of diagnosing dying and communicating palliative and end-of-life care to potential participants and how the recruitment process is influenced by the power relationships and hierarchies that exist among professional groups. These factors can lead to and support paternalistic practices. CONCLUSIONS Those planning trials need to ensure that trial recruiters, depending on their experience and trial characteristics, have access to training and support to address the 'emotional labour' of recruitment. The type of training required requires further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lesley Dunleavy
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, England, UK
| | - Nancy Preston
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, England, UK
| | - Catherine Walshe
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Landers A, Cahill C, McCall P, Kaw A, Brown H, McKenzie C, Agar M, Yenson V, Clarke K, Windsor J. Recruitment of participants with pancreatic cancer to a mixed media study for optimal recruitment in an Australasian survey of pancreatic enzyme replacement. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e076242. [PMID: 38035745 PMCID: PMC10689358 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer is relatively rare and aggressive, with digestion and malabsorption issues often leading to significant weight loss. Recruitment of people with this malignancy into studies can be challenging, and innovative methods need to be explored to improve recruitment rates. AIM To describe a mixed media methodology and the outcomes used to recruit patients to participate in a binational survey. METHODS The details of the mixed media method used to identify and recruit people with pancreatic cancer are described. This method was used to investigate pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy use in people with pancreatic cancer across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. RESULTS The mixed media approach was successful in reaching 334 participants from a range of ethnicities and regions. Results showed that social media platforms were notably more efficient and cost-effective than radio and newspaper but required additional expertise, including graphic design and media strategy knowledge. CONCLUSIONS Social media is an effective and efficient method of recruiting people with pancreatic cancer to a national survey. Studies using media to recruit patients may need to include team members with a range of skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Landers
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Charlotte Cahill
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Poppy McCall
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Anu Kaw
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Helen Brown
- Nurse Maude Hospice and Community Palliative Care, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Clare McKenzie
- Nurse Maude Hospice and Community Palliative Care, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Meera Agar
- IMPACCT Centre, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Vanessa Yenson
- IMPACCT Centre, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kate Clarke
- Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - John Windsor
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Buehler NJ, Frydman JL, Morrison RS, Gelfman LP. An Update: National Institutes of Health Research Funding for Palliative Medicine 2016-2020. J Palliat Med 2023; 26:509-516. [PMID: 36306522 PMCID: PMC10066773 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The evidence base to support palliative care clinical practice is inadequate and opportunities to improve the evidence base remain despite the field's rapid growth. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine current National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding of palliative medicine research and trends over time. Design: We sought to identify NIH funding of palliative medicine (2016-2020) in two stages: (1) we searched the NIH grant database, RePORTER, for grants with the keywords, "palliative care," "end-of-life care," "hospice," and "end of life," and (2) identified palliative care researchers likely to have secured NIH funding using three strategies. Methods: We abstracted (1) the first and last authors' names from original investigations published in major palliative medicine journals from 2016 to 2018; (2) names from a PubMed-generated list of original articles published in major medicine, nursing, and subspecialty journals using the above keywords; and (3) palliative medicine journal editorial board members and members of key palliative medicine initiatives. We cross-matched the pooled names against NIH grants funded from 2016 to 2021. Results: A crosswalk analysis of the author search and NIH RePORTER search identified 1658 grants. Of those, 541 were categorized as relevant to palliative medicine, which represented 419 unique principal investigators (mean of 1.34 grants per investigator). Compared with 2011-2015, the number of NIH-funded grants increased by 25%, NIH dollars increased by 35%, and the distribution of grant types remained stable. Conclusions: Despite the challenging NIH funding climate, the number of NIH grants and funding to palliative care have increased. Given the increased funding allocation toward Alzheimer's dementia and related dementia research at the congressional level, this increase in funding reflects this funding allocation and does not represent overall growth. Dedicated federal funding for palliative care research remains critical to grow the evidence base for persons living with serious illnesses and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julia L. Frydman
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - R. Sean Morrison
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- The National Palliative Care Research Center, New York, New York, USA
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Laura P. Gelfman
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Oliver DP, Washington K, Benson J, Kruse RL, Popejoy L, Liu J, Smith J, Pitzer K, White P, Demiris G. Access for Cancer Caregivers to Education and Support for Shared Decision Making (ACCESS) intervention: a cluster cross-over randomised clinical trial. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023:spcare-2022-004100. [PMID: 36863862 PMCID: PMC10474243 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2022-004100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to test an intervention named ACCESS (Access for Cancer Caregivers to Education and Support for Shared Decision Making). The intervention uses private Facebook support groups to support and educate caregivers, preparing them to participate in shared decision-making during web-based hospice care plan meetings. The overall hypothesis behind the study was that family caregivers of hospice patients with cancer would experience lower anxiety and depression as a result of participating in an online Facebook support group and shared decision-making with hospice staff in a web-based care plan meeting. METHODS This is a cluster cross-over randomised three-arm clinical trial where one group participated in both the Facebook group and the care plan team meeting. A second group participated only in the Facebook group and the third group was a control group and received usual hospice care. RESULTS There were 489 family caregivers who participated in the trial. There were no statistically significant differences between the ACCESS intervention group and the Facebook only or the control group on any outcome. The participants in the Facebook only group, however, experienced a statistically significant decrease in depression compared with the enhanced usual care group. CONCLUSIONS While the ACCESS intervention group did not experience significant improvement in outcomes, caregivers assigned to the Facebook only group showed significant improvement in depression scores from baseline as compared with the enhanced usual care control group. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms of action leading to reduced depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra Parker Oliver
- Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
- Goldfarb School of Nursing, Barnes-Jewish College, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Karla Washington
- Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jacquelyn Benson
- Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
- Goldfarb School of Nursing, Barnes-Jewish College, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Robin L Kruse
- Family Medicine, University of Missouri System, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Lori Popejoy
- Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri System, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Jingxia Liu
- Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jami Smith
- Family Medicine, University of Missouri System, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Kyle Pitzer
- Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Patrick White
- Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - George Demiris
- School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fahy BN. Current Guidelines for Integration of Palliative Care in Oncology. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2021; 30:431-447. [PMID: 34053660 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2021.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Multiple cancer societies and professional medical organizations recommend integration of palliative care into routine oncology care. A growing body of literature supports the benefits of palliative care in patients with cancer. Palliative care improves pain and other symptoms, enhances quality of life, and reduces depression. The best method and timing for integration of palliative care is unclear. Multiple barriers exist that prevent optimal palliative care integration; these barriers will require additional education and research to overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget N Fahy
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of New Mexico, 1 University of New Mexico, MSC 07-4025, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; Division of Palliative Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hui D, De La Rosa A, Chen J, Delgado Guay M, Heung Y, Dibaj S, Liu D, Bruera E. Palliative care education and research at US cancer centers: A national survey. Cancer 2021; 127:2139-2147. [PMID: 33662148 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Revised: 06/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative care (PC) education and research are essential to developing a skilled workforce and evidence base to support the delivery of quality cancer care. The current state of PC education and research at US cancer centers is unclear. In this national survey, the education and research programs of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated and nondesignated cancer centers and the changes between 2009 and 2018 are compared. METHODS Between April and August 2018, PC program leaders at all NCI-designated cancer centers and a random sample of nondesignated centers were sent a survey to examine the structure, processes, and outcomes of their programs on the basis of questions from a 2009 national survey. This preplanned analysis focused on education and research. RESULTS There were 52 of 61 (85%) NCI-designated and 27 of 38 (71%) nondesignated cancer centers that responded. NCI-designated centers were more likely than nondesignated centers to have a PC fellowship program (87% vs 30%; P < .001), training for advanced practice providers (71% vs 44%; P = .03), PC research program (58% vs 15%; P < .001), peer-reviewed funding (43% vs 11%; P = .005), and philanthropic grants (41% vs 7%; P = .002). There were few significant improvements in PC education or research between 2009 and 2018 for both groups, notable exceptions include an increase in PC fellowships (38% vs 87%; P < .001) and mandatory PC rotations for medical oncology fellows (29% vs 55%; P = .02) at NCI-designated cancer centers. CONCLUSIONS PC education and research are more developed at NCI-designated cancer centers. Despite some progress over the past decade, it is relatively slow and suboptimal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Hui
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Allison De La Rosa
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Joseph Chen
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Marvin Delgado Guay
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yvonne Heung
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Seyedeh Dibaj
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Diane Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Eduardo Bruera
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schenker Y, Ellington L, Bell L, Kross EK, Rosenberg AR, Kutner JS, Bickel KE, Ritchie C, Kavalieratos D, Bekelman DB, Mooney KB, Fischer SM. The National Postdoctoral Palliative Care Research Training Collaborative: History, Activities, Challenges, and Future Goals. J Palliat Med 2021; 24:545-553. [PMID: 32955969 PMCID: PMC8182655 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Palliative care-related postdoctoral training opportunities are critical to increase the quantity and quality of palliative care research. Objective: To describe the history, activities, challenges, and future goals of the National Postdoctoral Palliative Care Research Training Collaborative. Design: National web-based survey of participating program leaders. Measurements: Information about participating programs, trainees, challenges faced, and future goals. Results: Nine participating programs at academic institutions across the United States focus on diverse aspects of palliative care research. The majority of 73 current and former fellows are female (75%) and white (84%). In total, 38% of fellows (n = 28) have MD backgrounds, of whom less than half (n = 12) completed hospice and palliative medicine fellowships. An additional 38% of fellows (n = 28) have nursing PhD backgrounds and 23% (n = 17) have other diverse types of PhD backgrounds. Key challenges relate to recruiting diverse trainees, fostering a shared identity, effectively advocating for trainees, and securing funding. Future goals include expanding efforts to engage clinician and nonclinician scientists, fostering the pipeline of palliative care researchers through expanded mentorship of predoctoral and clinical trainees, increasing the number of postdoctoral palliative care training programs, and expanding funding support for career development grants. Conclusion: The National Postdoctoral Palliative Care Research Training Collaborative fills an important role in creating a community for palliative care research trainees and developing strategies to address shared challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yael Schenker
- Palliative Research Center (PaRC), Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lee Ellington
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Lindsay Bell
- Palliative Research Center (PaRC), Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Erin K. Kross
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Abby R. Rosenberg
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Palliative Care and Resilience Laboratory, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jean S. Kutner
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Kathleen E. Bickel
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Christine Ritchie
- Center for Palliative Care, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dio Kavalieratos
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - David B. Bekelman
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Stacy M. Fischer
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tandon P, Walling A, Patton H, Taddei T. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Palliative Care Management in Cirrhosis: Expert Review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:646-656.e3. [PMID: 33221550 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Care with palliative care principles (aka Palliative Care, PC) is an approach to care that focuses on improving the quality of life of patients and their caregivers who are facing life-limiting illness. It encompasses the assessment and management of symptoms and changes in functional status, the provision of advance care planning and goals of care discussions, prognostication and caregiver support. PC is applicable across the spectrum of cirrhosis regardless of transplant eligibility. Although a common misconception, PC is not synonymous with hospice care. Unfortunately, despite a high symptom burden and challenges with predicting disease course and mounting evidence to support the benefits of PC in patients with cirrhosis, comprehensive PC and referral to hospice are carried out infrequently and very late in the course of disease. In order to meet the needs of our increasingly prevalent cirrhosis population, it is important that all clinicians who care for these patients are able to work together to deliver PC as a standard of care. To date there are limited guidelines/guidance statements to direct clinicians in the area of PC and cirrhosis. Herein we present an evidence-based review of ten Best Practice Advice statements that address key issues pertaining to PC in patients with cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puneeta Tandon
- Liver Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Anne Walling
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California; Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Heather Patton
- Gastroenterology Section, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California
| | - Tamar Taddei
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, and Department of Medicine, Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Affiliation(s)
- Krista L Harrison
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Ashwin A Kotwal
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Alexander K Smith
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rosenberg AR, Barton K, Junkins C, Scott S, Bradford MC, Steineck A, Lau N, Comiskey L, Yi-Frazier JP. Creating a Resilient Research Program-Lessons Learned From a Palliative Care Research Laboratory. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 60:857-865. [PMID: 32621950 PMCID: PMC7328580 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.06.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Conducting palliative care research can be personally and professionally challenging. Although limitations in funding and training opportunities are well described, a less recognized barrier to successful palliative care research is creating a sustainable and resilient team. In this special report, we describe the experience and lessons learned in a single palliative care research laboratory. In the first few years of the program, 75% of staff quit, citing burnout and the emotional tolls of their work. To address our sustainability, we translated resilience theory to practice. First, we identified and operationalized shared mission and values. Next, we conducted a resilience resource needs assessment for both individual team members and the larger team as a whole and created a workshop-based curriculum to address unmet personal and professional support needs. Finally, we changed our leadership approach to foster psychological safety and shared mission. Since then, no team member has left, and the program has thrived. As the demand for rigorous palliative care research grows, we hope this report will provide perspective and ideas to other established and emerging palliative care research programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abby R Rosenberg
- Palliative Care and Resilience Lab, Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
| | - Krysta Barton
- Palliative Care and Resilience Lab, Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Courtney Junkins
- Palliative Care and Resilience Lab, Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Samantha Scott
- Palliative Care and Resilience Lab, Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Miranda C Bradford
- Palliative Care and Resilience Lab, Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA; Children's Core for Biomedical Statistics, Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Angela Steineck
- Palliative Care and Resilience Lab, Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Nancy Lau
- Palliative Care and Resilience Lab, Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Liam Comiskey
- Palliative Care and Resilience Lab, Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Joyce P Yi-Frazier
- Palliative Care and Resilience Lab, Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mehta AK, Patel R, Patel D, Davis MP. Trends in Published Palliative Care Research: A 15-Year Review. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2020; 38:489-493. [PMID: 32705878 DOI: 10.1177/1049909120944863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been a call for palliative care (PC) published research to support the impact and need for more specialty PC services. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to characterize research in PC over a 15-year period in 3 PC journals published in the United States. DESIGN The authors reviewed every issue of the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Journal of Palliative Medicine, and American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine from 2004 through 2018. Studies included were original articles and brief reports. Study type (qualitative, quantitative), author (first and last), gender, and professional degree of the author (first and last) were recorded. RESULTS A total of 4881 articles were included in this study. The proportion of quantitative papers significantly increased across 3 time points from 63% to 67% to 78%. The proportion of women first authors increased across all 3 time points (54%, 2004-2008; 57%, 2009-2013; 60%, 2014-2018), and the proportion of women last authors increased across all time points (38%, 2004-2008; 44%, 2009-2013; 46%, 2014-2018). More than 40% of authors were physicians. CONCLUSIONS Published PC studies are increasingly quantitative in design. Gender authorship is female dominant for the first authors and increasingly equal across genders for the last authors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambereen K Mehta
- Palliative Care Program, 8783 University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, CA, USA
| | - Rishi Patel
- Palliative Care Program, 8783 University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, CA, USA.,Comprehensive Blood & Cancer Center, Bakersfield, CA, USA
| | - Dheer Patel
- 1259University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mellar P Davis
- Department of Palliative Care, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kamal AH, Bowman B, Ritchie CS. Identifying Palliative Care Champions to Promote High-Quality Care to Those with Serious Illness. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020; 67:S461-S467. [PMID: 31074852 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Leading medical authorities advocate for routine integration of palliative care for all major causes of death in the United States. With rapid growth and acceptance, the field of palliative care is tasked with addressing a compelling question of its time: "Who will deliver timely, evidence-based palliative care to all who should benefit?" The current number of palliative care specialists will not suffice to meet the needs of persons with serious illness. In 2010, initial estimates quantified the shortage at 6000 to 18 000 additional palliative care physicians needed to fully staff existing programs. Unfortunately, the predicted number of specialty physicians in 2030 will likely not be larger than the workforce in existence today. These findings result in a physician-to-serious-illness-person ratio of about 1:28 000 in 2030.1 To address the workforce shortage, stronger alignment is needed between intensity of patient needs and provision of palliative care services. Such an alignment better harnesses the talents of those in a position to deliver core palliative care services (such as discussing goals of care with patients or managing their symptoms) while engaging palliative care specialists to address more complex issues. We introduce the concept of "Palliative Care Champions," who sit at the nexus between specialty palliative care and the larger clinical workforce. Acknowledging that the needs of most patients can be met by clinicians who have received basic palliative care training, and that specialty palliative care is not always available for those with more complex needs, there exists an important opportunity for those with additional interest to scale training and quality improvement to fill this void. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:S461-S467, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arif H Kamal
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke Fuqua School of Business, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brynn Bowman
- Center to Advance Palliative Care, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kross EK, Rosenberg AR, Engelberg RA, Curtis JR. Postdoctoral Research Training in Palliative Care: Lessons Learned From a T32 Program. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 59:750-760.e8. [PMID: 31775020 PMCID: PMC7029795 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Our aging population and advances in chronic disease management that prolong the time that patients live with a chronic illness have combined to create an enormous need for improved palliative care research across diverse diseases. In this article, we describe the structure and processes of a National Institutes of Health-funded T32 postdoctoral research fellowship at the University of Washington and our experiences in developing and implementing the program. We recognize a broad definition of palliative care research, including research focused on improving quality of life, minimizing symptoms, providing psychological and spiritual support, and improving communication about patients' values and goals of care, all in the context of a serious illness. We describe our four core principles for postdoctoral training in palliative care research, each with a number of specific approaches: 1) mastering a set of essential content and research skills; 2) structured mentoring and academic career development; 3) creating and supporting early success; and 4) interdisciplinary training and team science. In addition, we also describe our framework for the essential competencies necessary for a palliative care research training program, our methods for identification and selection of applicants, our outcomes to date, and our processes of continuous quality assessment and improvement. Our goal is to describe our successful postdoctoral research training program in palliative care to promote development of new programs and share information between programs to continue to build the field of collaborative and interdisciplinary palliative care research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin K Kross
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Abby R Rosenberg
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ruth A Engelberg
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - J Randall Curtis
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Oliver DP, Washington KT, Demiris G, White P. Challenges in Implementing Hospice Clinical Trials: Preserving Scientific Integrity While Facing Change. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 59:365-371. [PMID: 31610273 PMCID: PMC6989375 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Revised: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Numerous changes can occur between the original design plans for clinical trials, the submission of funding proposals, and the implementation of the clinical trial. In the hospice setting, environmental changes can present significant obstacles, which require changes to the original plan designs, recruitment, and staffing. The purpose of the study was to share lessons and problem-solving strategies that can assist in future hospice trials. METHODS This study uses one hospice clinical trial as an exemplar to demonstrate challenges for clinical trial research in this setting. Using preliminary data collected during the first months of a trial, the research team details the many ways their current protocol reflects changes from the originally proposed plans. Experiences are used as an exemplar to address the following questions: 1) How do research environments change between the initial submission of a funding proposal and the eventual award? 2) How can investigators maintain the integrity of the research and accommodate unexpected changes in the research environment? RESULTS The changing environment within the hospice setting required design, sampling, and recruitment changes within the first year. The decision-making process resulted in a stronger design with greater generalization. As a result of necessary protocol changes, the study results are positioned to be translational following the study conclusion. CONCLUSION Researchers would do well to review their protocol and statistics early in a clinical trial. They should be prepared for adjustments to accommodate market and environmental changes outside their control. Ongoing data monitoring, specifically related to recruitment, is advised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra Parker Oliver
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
| | - Karla T Washington
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - George Demiris
- Penn Innovates Knowledge Professor, Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Patrick White
- Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Marcus KL, Santos G, Ciapponi A, Comandé D, Bilodeau M, Wolfe J, Dussel V. Impact of Specialized Pediatric Palliative Care: A Systematic Review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 59:339-364.e10. [PMID: 31404638 PMCID: PMC6989377 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Specialized pediatric palliative care (SPPC) is increasingly involved in the care of seriously ill children, yet the evidence on its impact has not been comprehensively reviewed. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the effects of providing SPPC to seriously ill children on patient-, caregiver-, and systems-level outcomes. METHODS We performed a Systematic Review following Cochrane methods. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Global Health, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, LILACS, and Web of Science were searched from January 1996 to June 2018. STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION We included randomized controlled, cohort, case-control, and before-after studies in which exposure to SPPC services was the intervention of interest. All outcomes reported in these studies were included. Two investigators independently selected articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias of included studies using standardized criteria. RESULTS Twenty-four studies were included in qualitative synthesis: one nonrandomized controlled trial, 16 cohort studies, and seven before-after studies. Evidence certainty was low. Twenty-one studies had one or more area with high risk of bias, most commonly selection bias, low group comparability, risk for confounding, and inadequate statistical reporting. Studies analyzed 46 domains, operationalized as 136 distinct outcomes. SPPC was associated with better child quality of life scores in all four studies that assessed this outcome. No other outcome showed this consistency. CONCLUSION Receiving SPPC was associated with better child quality of life. However, the paucity and low certainty of the evidence precluded any firm recommendations about SPPC practice. Larger collaborative networks and greater consensus regarding SPPC research standards are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine L Marcus
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gisella Santos
- Center for Research and Implementation in Palliative Care, Instituto de Efectividad Clinica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Agustín Ciapponi
- Cochrane Center, Instituto de Efectividad Clinica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Daniel Comandé
- Cochrane Center, Instituto de Efectividad Clinica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Madeline Bilodeau
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joanne Wolfe
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Veronica Dussel
- Center for Research and Implementation in Palliative Care, Instituto de Efectividad Clinica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kamal AH, Docherty SL, Reeve BB, Samsa GP, Bosworth HB, Pollak KI. Helping the Demand Find the Supply: Messaging the Value of Specialty Palliative Care Directly to Those With Serious Illnesses. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 57:e6-e7. [PMID: 30853550 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Arif H Kamal
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Duke School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| | | | - Bryce B Reeve
- Duke School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fricker ZP, Serper M. Current Knowledge, Barriers to Implementation, and Future Directions in Palliative Care for End-Stage Liver Disease. Liver Transpl 2019; 25:787-796. [PMID: 30758901 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 02/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
End-stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality as well as symptom burden. Despite this, the rate of consultation with palliative care (PC) providers remains low, and invasive procedures near the end of life are commonplace. Studies show that involvement of PC providers improves patient satisfaction, and evidence from other chronic diseases demonstrates reduced costs of care and potentially increased survival. Better integration of PC is imperative but hindered by patient and provider misconceptions about its role in the care of patients with ESLD, specifically among candidates for liver transplantation. Additionally, reimbursement barriers and lack of provider knowledge may contribute to PC underutilization. In this review, we discuss the benefits of PC in ESLD, the variability of its delivery, and key stakeholders' perceptions about its use. Additionally, we identify barriers to more widespread PC adoption and highlight areas for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary P Fricker
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Marina Serper
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Reynolds EE, Buss MK, Schlechter BL, Tess A. Would You Refer This Patient With Cancer to a Palliative Care Specialist?: Grand Rounds Discussion From Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Ann Intern Med 2019; 170:488-496. [PMID: 30934082 DOI: 10.7326/m19-0361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2016, the American Society of Clinical Oncology published a guideline recommending that all patients with advanced cancer be referred to palliative care providers. This recommendation was based on a series of trials showing that palliative care, when added to standard oncology treatment, improves outcomes, including quality of life. Here, 2 oncologists, 1 of whom is also a palliative care specialist, debate the guideline and discuss how best to care for a 71-year-old woman with metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma who has a short life expectancy but feels well and has no symptoms related to her cancer or chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen E Reynolds
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (E.E.R., M.K.B., B.L.S., A.T.)
| | - Mary K Buss
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (E.E.R., M.K.B., B.L.S., A.T.)
| | - Benjamin L Schlechter
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (E.E.R., M.K.B., B.L.S., A.T.)
| | - Anjala Tess
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (E.E.R., M.K.B., B.L.S., A.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lyons KD, Padgett LS, Marshall TF, Greer JA, Silver JK, Raj VS, Zucker DS, Fu JB, Pergolotti M, Sleight AG, Alfano CM. Follow the trail: Using insights from the growth of palliative care to propose a roadmap for cancer rehabilitation. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69:113-126. [PMID: 30457670 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite research explicating the benefits of cancer rehabilitation interventions to optimize physical, social, emotional, and vocational functioning, many reports document low rates of referral to and uptake of rehabilitation in oncology. Cancer rehabilitation clinicians, researchers, and policy makers could learn from the multidisciplinary specialty of palliative care, which has benefited from a growth strategy and has garnered national recognition as an important and necessary aspect of oncology care. The purpose of this article is to explore the actions that have increased the uptake and integration of palliative care to yield insights and multimodal strategies for the development and growth of cancer rehabilitation. After examining the history of palliative care and its growth, the authors highlight 5 key strategies that may benefit the field of cancer rehabilitation: 1) stimulating the science in specific gap areas; 2) creating clinical practice guidelines; 3) building clinical capacity; 4) ascertaining and responding to public opinion; and 5) advocating for public policy change. Coordinated and simultaneous advances on these 5 strategies may catalyze the growth, utilization, and effectiveness of patient screening, timely referrals, and delivery of appropriate cancer rehabilitation care that reduces disability and improves quality of life for cancer survivors who need these services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen D Lyons
- Scientist, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
- Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
| | - Lynne S Padgett
- Health Psychologist, Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Timothy F Marshall
- Assistant Professor, School of Physical Therapy, Kean University, Union, NJ
| | - Joseph A Greer
- Program Director, Center for Psychiatric Oncology & Behavioral Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Assistant Professor of Psychology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Julie K Silver
- Associate Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Associate in Physiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Vishwa S Raj
- Associate Professor, Director of Oncology Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Carolinas Rehabilitation, Department of Supportive Care, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
| | - David S Zucker
- Medical Director & Program Leader, Cancer Rehabilitation Services, Swedish Cancer Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jack B Fu
- Associate Professor, Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mackenzi Pergolotti
- Director of Research, ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation, Select Medical, Mechanicsburg, PA
| | - Alix G Sleight
- Postdoctoral Fellow, Keck School of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Morrison RS, Aldridge MD, Block J, Chiu L, Maroney C, Morrison CA, Meier DE. The National Palliative Care Research Center: Ten Years of Promoting and Developing Research in Palliative Care. J Palliat Med 2018; 21:1548-1557. [PMID: 30136886 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evidence base to support high-quality clinical care and number of scientists available to develop this evidence base are inadequate. OBJECTIVE To describe the first 10 years of the National Palliative Care Research Center's (NPCRC) programs and their outcomes. DESIGN Established in 2005, NPCRC was created in direct response to the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine. Specifically, NPCRC was created to expand the palliative care evidence-based needed for both health policy and clinical practice by supporting research scientists, stimulating research and innovation, and creating a community of researchers focused on the needs of persons with serious illness and their families. MEASUREMENTS Subsequent grant funding following NPCRC investment (web searches of NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools [RePORT], Veterans Administration and Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute [PCORI] grant databases, grantee on-line surveys, and grantee annual reports) promotions (grantee on-line surveys and annual reports), publications (PubMed searches), and NPCRC participant satisfaction (grantee questionnaires). RESULTS As of July 2017, NPCRC has funded 47 junior investigators representing over 10 disciplines. These investigators have leveraged NPCRC's $7.8 million investment into 52 federal grants totaling $74.8 million dollars and 69 foundation grants totaling $16 million. Thirty-five grants ($5.8 million) have been awarded to experienced investigators, resulting in additional grant funding of $104.5 million dollars ($78.5 million federal, $26 million nonfederal). Satisfaction with NPCRC's program has been uniformly high and policy efforts have resulted in enhanced federal funding opportunities in palliative care research. CONCLUSIONS NPCRC's focus on people and infrastructure in conjunction with a top-down bottom-up strategy has been critical in improving the palliative care evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Sean Morrison
- 1 National Palliative Care Research Center of the Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Melissa D Aldridge
- 1 National Palliative Care Research Center of the Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - James Block
- 1 National Palliative Care Research Center of the Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.,2 Center to Advance Palliative Care of the Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Lily Chiu
- 1 National Palliative Care Research Center of the Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Catherine Maroney
- 1 National Palliative Care Research Center of the Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Corey A Morrison
- 1 National Palliative Care Research Center of the Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.,3 Brown University School of Public Health , Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Diane E Meier
- 2 Center to Advance Palliative Care of the Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|