1
|
Bryan AF, Reich AJ, Norton AC, Campbell ML, Schwartzstein RM, Cooper Z, White DB, Mitchell SL, Fehnel CR. Process of Withdrawal of Mechanical Ventilation at End of Life in the ICU: Clinician Perceptions. CHEST CRITICAL CARE 2024; 2:100051. [PMID: 38957855 PMCID: PMC11218830 DOI: 10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nearly one-quarter of all Americans die in the ICU. Many of their deaths are anticipated and occur following the withdrawal of mechanical ventilation (WMV). However, there are few data on which to base best practices for interdisciplinary ICU teams to conduct WMV. RESEARCH QUESTION What are the perceptions of current WMV practices among ICU clinicians, and what are their opinions of processes that might improve the practice of WMV at end of life in the ICU? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS This prospective two-center observational study conducted in Boston, Massachusetts, the Observational Study of the Withdrawal of Mechanical Ventilation (OBSERVE-WMV) was designed to better understand the perspectives of clinicians and experience of patients undergoing WMV. This report focuses on analyses of qualitative data obtained from in-person surveys administered to the ICU clinicians (nurses, respiratory therapists, and physicians) caring for these patients. Surveys assessed a broad range of clinician perspectives on planning, as well as the key processes required for WMV. This analysis used independent open, inductive coding of responses to open-ended questions. Initial codes were reconciled iteratively and then organized and interpreted using a thematic analysis approach. Opinions were assessed on how WMV could be improved for individual patients and the ICU as a whole. RESULTS Among 456 eligible clinicians, 312 in-person surveys were completed by clinicians caring for 152 patients who underwent WMV. Qualitative analyses identified two main themes characterizing high-quality WMV processes: (1) good communication (eg, mutual understanding of family preferences) between the ICU team and family; and (2) medical management (eg, planning, availability of ICU team) that minimizes patient distress. Team member support was identified as an essential process component in both themes. INTERPRETATION Clinician perceptions of the appropriateness or success of WMV prioritize the quality of team and family communication and patient symptom management. Both are modifiable targets of interventions aimed at optimizing overall WMV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ava Ferguson Bryan
- Department of Surgery (A. F. B.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital (A. F. B. and A. J. R.), Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (A. C. N., R. M. S., S. L. M., and C. R. F.), Boston, MA; Wayne State University (M. L. C.), Detroit, MI; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School (Z. C.), Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (D. B. W.), Pittsburgh, PA; and the Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S. L. M. and C. R. F.), Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| | - Amanda J Reich
- Department of Surgery (A. F. B.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital (A. F. B. and A. J. R.), Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (A. C. N., R. M. S., S. L. M., and C. R. F.), Boston, MA; Wayne State University (M. L. C.), Detroit, MI; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School (Z. C.), Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (D. B. W.), Pittsburgh, PA; and the Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S. L. M. and C. R. F.), Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| | - Andrea C Norton
- Department of Surgery (A. F. B.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital (A. F. B. and A. J. R.), Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (A. C. N., R. M. S., S. L. M., and C. R. F.), Boston, MA; Wayne State University (M. L. C.), Detroit, MI; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School (Z. C.), Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (D. B. W.), Pittsburgh, PA; and the Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S. L. M. and C. R. F.), Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| | - Margaret L Campbell
- Department of Surgery (A. F. B.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital (A. F. B. and A. J. R.), Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (A. C. N., R. M. S., S. L. M., and C. R. F.), Boston, MA; Wayne State University (M. L. C.), Detroit, MI; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School (Z. C.), Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (D. B. W.), Pittsburgh, PA; and the Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S. L. M. and C. R. F.), Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| | - Richard M Schwartzstein
- Department of Surgery (A. F. B.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital (A. F. B. and A. J. R.), Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (A. C. N., R. M. S., S. L. M., and C. R. F.), Boston, MA; Wayne State University (M. L. C.), Detroit, MI; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School (Z. C.), Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (D. B. W.), Pittsburgh, PA; and the Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S. L. M. and C. R. F.), Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| | - Zara Cooper
- Department of Surgery (A. F. B.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital (A. F. B. and A. J. R.), Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (A. C. N., R. M. S., S. L. M., and C. R. F.), Boston, MA; Wayne State University (M. L. C.), Detroit, MI; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School (Z. C.), Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (D. B. W.), Pittsburgh, PA; and the Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S. L. M. and C. R. F.), Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| | - Douglas B White
- Department of Surgery (A. F. B.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital (A. F. B. and A. J. R.), Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (A. C. N., R. M. S., S. L. M., and C. R. F.), Boston, MA; Wayne State University (M. L. C.), Detroit, MI; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School (Z. C.), Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (D. B. W.), Pittsburgh, PA; and the Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S. L. M. and C. R. F.), Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| | - Susan L Mitchell
- Department of Surgery (A. F. B.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital (A. F. B. and A. J. R.), Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (A. C. N., R. M. S., S. L. M., and C. R. F.), Boston, MA; Wayne State University (M. L. C.), Detroit, MI; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School (Z. C.), Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (D. B. W.), Pittsburgh, PA; and the Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S. L. M. and C. R. F.), Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| | - Corey R Fehnel
- Department of Surgery (A. F. B.), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital (A. F. B. and A. J. R.), Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (A. C. N., R. M. S., S. L. M., and C. R. F.), Boston, MA; Wayne State University (M. L. C.), Detroit, MI; Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School (Z. C.), Boston, MA; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (D. B. W.), Pittsburgh, PA; and the Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S. L. M. and C. R. F.), Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Belur AD, Mehta A, Bansal M, Wieruszewski PM, Kataria R, Saad M, Clancy A, Levine DJ, Sodha NR, Burtt DM, Rachu GS, Abbott JD, Vallabhajosyula S. Palliative care in the cardiovascular intensive care unit: A systematic review of current literature. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2024:S1553-8389(24)00112-X. [PMID: 38531709 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.03.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been an evolution in the disease severity and complexity of patients presenting to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). There are limited data evaluating the role of palliative care in contemporary CICU practice. METHODS PubMed Central, CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were evaluated for studies on palliative care in adults (≥18 years) admitted with acute cardiovascular conditions - acute myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, advanced heart failure, post-cardiac surgery, spontaneous coronary artery dissection, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, and pulmonary embolism - admitted to the CICU, coronary care unit or cardiovascular intensive care unit from 1/1/2000 to 8/8/2022. The primary outcome of interest was the utilization of palliative care services. Secondary outcomes of included studies were also addressed. Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity. RESULTS Of 5711 citations, 30 studies were included. All studies were published in the last seven years and 90 % originated in the United States. Twenty-seven studies (90 %) were retrospective analyses, with a majority from the National Inpatient Sample database. Heart failure was the most frequent diagnosis (47 %), and in-hospital mortality was reported in 67 % of studies. There was heterogeneity in the timing, frequency, and background of the care team that determined palliative care consultation. In two randomized trials, there appeared to be improvement in quality of life without an impact on mortality. CONCLUSIONS Despite the growing recognition of the role of palliative care, there are limited data on palliative care consultation in the CICU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agastya D Belur
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States of America
| | - Aryan Mehta
- Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, United States of America
| | - Mridul Bansal
- Department of Medicine, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, United States of America
| | - Patrick M Wieruszewski
- Departments of Pharmacy and Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Rachna Kataria
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America; Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Marwan Saad
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America; Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Annaliese Clancy
- Department of Pharmacy, Lifespan Health System, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Daniel J Levine
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America; Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Neel R Sodha
- Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute, Providence, RI, United States of America; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Douglas M Burtt
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America; Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Gregory S Rachu
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - J Dawn Abbott
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America; Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America; Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute, Providence, RI, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oud L. Disparities in Palliative Care Among Critically Ill Patients With and Without COVID-19 at the End of Life: A Population-Based Analysis. J Clin Med Res 2023; 15:438-445. [PMID: 38189035 PMCID: PMC10769605 DOI: 10.14740/jocmr5027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The surge in critical illness and associated mortality brought by the coronavirus virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, coupled with staff shortages and restrictions of family visitation, may have adversely affected delivery of palliative measures, including at the end of life of affected patients. However, the population-level patterns of palliative care (PC) utilization among septic critically ill patients with and without COVID-19 during end-of-life hospitalizations are unknown. Methods A statewide dataset was used to identify patients aged ≥ 18 years with intensive care unit (ICU) admission and a diagnosis of sepsis in Texas, who died during hospital stay during April 1 to December 31, 2020. COVID-19 was defined by the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) code U07.1, and PC was identified by ICD-10 code Z51.5. Multivariable logistic models were fitted to estimate the association of COVID-19 with use of PC among ICU admissions. A similar approach was used for sensitivity analyses of strata with previously reported lower and higher than reference use of PC. Results There were 20,244 patients with sepsis admitted to ICU during terminal hospitalization, and 9,206 (45.5%) had COVID-19. The frequency of PC among patients with and without COVID-19 was 32.0% vs. 37.1%, respectively. On adjusted analysis, the odds of PC use remained lower among patients with COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78 - 0.90), with similar findings on sensitivity analyses. Conclusions PC was markedly less common among critically ill septic patients with COVID-19 during terminal hospitalization, compared to those without COVID-19. Further studies are needed to determine the factors underlying these findings in order to reduce disparities in use of PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lavi Oud
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at the Permian Basin, Odessa, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kiker WA, Cheng S, Pollack LR, Creutzfeldt CJ, Kross EK, Curtis JR, Belden KA, Melamed R, Armaignac DL, Heavner SF, Christie AB, Banner-Goodspeed VM, Khanna AK, Sili U, Anderson HL, Kumar V, Walkey A, Kashyap R, Gajic O, Domecq JP, Khandelwal N. Admission Code Status and End-of-life Care for Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 64:359-369. [PMID: 35764202 PMCID: PMC9233554 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted variability in intensity of care. We aimed to characterize intensity of care among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. OBJECTIVES Examine the prevalence and predictors of admission code status, palliative care consultation, comfort-measures-only orders, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. METHODS This cross-sectional study examined data from an international registry of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. A proportional odds model evaluated predictors of more aggressive code status (i.e., Full Code) vs. less (i.e., Do Not Resuscitate, DNR). Among decedents, logistic regression was used to identify predictors of palliative care consultation, comfort measures only, and CPR at time of death. RESULTS We included 29,923 patients across 179 sites. Among those with admission code status documented, Full Code was selected by 90% (n = 15,273). Adjusting for site, Full Code was more likely for patients who were of Black or Asian race (ORs 1.82, 95% CIs 1.5-2.19; 1.78, 1.15-3.09 respectively, relative to White race), Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.89, CI 1.35-2.32), and male sex (OR 1.16, CI 1.0-1.33). Of the 4951 decedents, 29% received palliative care consultation, 59% transitioned to comfort measures only, and 29% received CPR, with non-White racial and ethnic groups less likely to receive comfort measures only and more likely to receive CPR. CONCLUSION In this international cohort of patients with COVID-19, Full Code was the initial code status in the majority, and more likely among patients who were Black or Asian race, Hispanic ethnicity or male. These results provide direction for future studies to improve these disparities in care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whitney A Kiker
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine (W.A.K., L.R.P., E.K.K., J.R.C., ), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence (WA.K., L.R.P., C.J.C., E.K.K., J.R.C., N.K.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Si Cheng
- Department of Biostatistics (S.C.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lauren R Pollack
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine (W.A.K., L.R.P., E.K.K., J.R.C., ), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence (WA.K., L.R.P., C.J.C., E.K.K., J.R.C., N.K.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Claire J Creutzfeldt
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence (WA.K., L.R.P., C.J.C., E.K.K., J.R.C., N.K.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Neurology, Harborview Medical Center (C.J.C.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Erin K Kross
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine (W.A.K., L.R.P., E.K.K., J.R.C., ), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence (WA.K., L.R.P., C.J.C., E.K.K., J.R.C., N.K.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - J Randall Curtis
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine (W.A.K., L.R.P., E.K.K., J.R.C., ), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence (WA.K., L.R.P., C.J.C., E.K.K., J.R.C., N.K.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Katherine A Belden
- Division of Infectious Diseases (K.A.B.), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Roman Melamed
- Abbott Northwestern Hospital (R.M.), Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Donna Lee Armaignac
- Center for Advanced Analytics (D.L.A.), Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Smith F Heavner
- Department of Public Health Sciences (S.F.H.), Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
| | - Amy B Christie
- Department of Critical Care (A.B.C.), Atrium Health Navicent, Macon, GA, USA
| | - Valerie M Banner-Goodspeed
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (V.M.B-G.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ashish K Khanna
- Department of Anesthesiology, Section on Critical Care Medicine (A.K.K.), Perioperative Outcomes and Informatics Collaborative (POIC), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Outcomes Research Consortium (A.K.K.), Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Uluhan Sili
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, School of Medicine (U.S.), Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Harry L Anderson
- Department of Surgery (H.L.A.), St Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Vishakha Kumar
- Society of Critical Medicine (V.K.), Mount Prospect, IL, USA
| | - Allan Walkey
- The Pulmonary Center, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, and Evans Center of Implementation and Improvement Sciences, Department of Medicine (A.W.), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rahul Kashyap
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (R.K., O.G.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ognjen Gajic
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (R.K., O.G.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Juan Pablo Domecq
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension (J.P.D.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Critical Care Medicine (J.P.D.), Mayo Clinic, Mankato, MN, USA
| | - Nita Khandelwal
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence (WA.K., L.R.P., C.J.C., E.K.K., J.R.C., N.K.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (N.K.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wendlandt B, Olm-Shipman C, Ceppe A, Hough CL, White DB, Cox CE, Carson SS. Surrogates of Patients With Severe Acute Brain Injury Experience Persistent Anxiety and Depression Over the 6 Months After ICU Admission. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:e633-e639. [PMID: 35595376 PMCID: PMC9179180 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.02.336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Severe Acute Brain Injury (SABI) is neurologically devastating, and surrogates for these patients may struggle with particularly complex decisions due to substantial prognostic uncertainty. OBJECTIVES To compare anxiety and depression symptoms over time between SABI surrogates and non-SABI surrogates for patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV). METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of the data from a multicenter randomized trial of a decision aid intervention for surrogates of adults experiencing PMV. Eligible patients were enrolled from medical, surgical, trauma, cardiac, and neurologic intensive care units (ICUs). ICU admitting diagnoses were used to identify patients experiencing SABI. We compared anxiety and depression symptoms as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score 6 months after trial enrollment between surrogates of patients with SABI and surrogates of patients experiencing PMV for other reasons. RESULTS Our analysis included 206 patients, 60 (29%) with SABI and 146 (71%) without SABI, and their primary surrogate decision makers. After adjusting for potential confounders including surrogate demographics, surrogate financial distress, patient severity of illness baseline GCS, and patient health status at 6 months, we found that surrogates of patients experiencing SABI had higher symptoms of anxiety and depression than surrogates of non-SABI patients (adjusted mean difference 3.6, 95% CI 1.2-6.0). CONCLUSION Surrogates of PMV patients with SABI experience persistently elevated anxiety and depression symptoms over 6 months compared to surrogates of PMV patients without SABI. Further work is needed to understand contributors to prolonged distress in this higher risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blair Wendlandt
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine (B.W., A.C., S.S.C.), University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
| | - Casey Olm-Shipman
- Division of Neurocritical Care (C.O.-S.), Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Agathe Ceppe
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine (B.W., A.C., S.S.C.), University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Catherine L Hough
- Department of Critical Care Medicine (D.B.W.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Douglas B White
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine (C.E.C.), Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christopher E Cox
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care (C.L.H.), Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Shannon S Carson
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine (B.W., A.C., S.S.C.), University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chapman AC, Lin JA, Cobert J, Marks A, Lin J, O'Riordan DL, Pantilat SZ. Utilization and Delivery of Specialty Palliative Care in the ICU: Insights from the Palliative Care Quality Network. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:e611-e619. [PMID: 35595374 PMCID: PMC9303815 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Palliative care (PC) benefits critically ill patients but remains underutilized. Important to developing interventions to overcome barriers to PC in the ICU and address PC needs of ICU patients is to understand how, when, and for which patients PC is provided in the ICU. OBJECTIVES Compare characteristics of specialty PC consultations in the ICU to those on medical-surgical wards. METHODS Retrospective analysis of national Palliative Care Quality Network data for hospitalized patients receiving specialty PC consultation January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2019 in ICU or medical-surgical setting. 98 inpatient PC teams in 16 states contributed data. Measures and outcomes included patient characteristics, consultation features, process metrics and patient outcomes. Mixed effects multivariable logistic regression was used to compare ICU and medical-surgical units. RESULTS Of 102,597 patients 63,082 were in medical-surgical units and 39,515 ICU. ICU patients were younger and more likely to have non-cancer diagnoses (all P < 0.001). While fewer ICU patients were able to report symptoms, most patients in both groups reported improved symptoms. ICU patients were more likely to have consultation requests for GOC, comfort care, and withdrawal of interventions and less likely for pain and/or symptoms (OR-all P < 0.001). ICU patients were less often discharged alive. CONCLUSION ICU patients receiving PC consultation are more likely to have non-cancer diagnoses and less likely able to communicate. Although symptom management and GOC are standard parts of ICU care, specialty PC in the ICU is often engaged for these issues and results in improved symptoms, suggesting routine interventions and consultation targeting these needs could improve care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allyson Cook Chapman
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (A.C.C., J.A.L., J.L., D.L.O.R., S.Z.P.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Department of Surgery (A.C.C., J.A.L.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia (A.C.C., J.C.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
| | - Joseph A Lin
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (A.C.C., J.A.L., J.L., D.L.O.R., S.Z.P.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Department of Surgery (A.C.C., J.A.L.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Julien Cobert
- Anesthesia Service (J.C.), San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, California; Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia (A.C.C., J.C.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Angela Marks
- Department of Medicine (A.M.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jessica Lin
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (A.C.C., J.A.L., J.L., D.L.O.R., S.Z.P.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - David L O'Riordan
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (A.C.C., J.A.L., J.L., D.L.O.R., S.Z.P.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Steven Z Pantilat
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (A.C.C., J.A.L., J.L., D.L.O.R., S.Z.P.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cox CE, Ashana DC, Haines KL, Casarett D, Olsen MK, Parish A, O’Keefe YA, Al-Hegelan M, Harrison RW, Naglee C, Katz JN, Frear A, Pratt EH, Gu J, Riley IL, Otis-Green S, Johnson KS, Docherty SL. Assessment of Clinical Palliative Care Trigger Status vs Actual Needs Among Critically Ill Patients and Their Family Members. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2144093. [PMID: 35050358 PMCID: PMC8777568 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Palliative care consultations in intensive care units (ICUs) are increasingly prompted by clinical characteristics associated with mortality or resource utilization. However, it is not known whether these triggers reflect actual palliative care needs. OBJECTIVE To compare unmet needs by clinical palliative care trigger status (present vs absent). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prospective cohort study was conducted in 6 adult medical and surgical ICUs in academic and community hospitals in North Carolina between January 2019 and September 2020. Participants were consecutive patients receiving mechanical ventilation and their family members. EXPOSURE Presence of any of 9 common clinical palliative care triggers. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the Needs at the End-of-Life Screening Tool (NEST) score (range, 0-130, with higher scores reflecting greater need), which was completed after 3 days of ICU care. Trigger status performance in identifying serious need (NEST score ≥30) was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and C statistics. RESULTS Surveys were completed by 257 of 360 family members of patients (71.4% of the potentially eligible patient-family member dyads approached) with a median age of 54.0 years (IQR, 44-62 years); 197 family members (76.7%) were female, and 83 (32.3%) were Black. The median age of patients was 58.0 years (IQR, 46-68 years); 126 patients (49.0%) were female, and 88 (33.5%) were Black. There was no difference in median NEST score between participants with a trigger present (45%) and those with a trigger absent (55%) (21.0; IQR, 12.0-37.0 vs 22.5; IQR, 12.0-39.0; P = .52). Trigger presence was associated with poor sensitivity (45%; 95% CI, 34%-55%), specificity (55%; 95% CI, 48%-63%), positive likelihood ratio (1.0; 95% CI, 0.7-1.3), negative likelihood ratio (1.0; 95% CI, 0.8-1.2), and C statistic (0.50; 95% CI, 0.44-0.57). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, clinical palliative care trigger status was not associated with palliative care needs and no better than chance at identifying the most serious needs, which raises questions about an increasingly common clinical practice. Focusing care delivery on directly measured needs may represent a more person-centered alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher E. Cox
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Program to Support People and Enhance Recovery (ProSPER), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Deepshikha Charan Ashana
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Program to Support People and Enhance Recovery (ProSPER), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Krista L. Haines
- Program to Support People and Enhance Recovery (ProSPER), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Division of Trauma and Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - David Casarett
- Section of Palliative Care and Hospice Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Maren K. Olsen
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Alice Parish
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Mashael Al-Hegelan
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Robert W. Harrison
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Colleen Naglee
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jason N. Katz
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Allie Frear
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Program to Support People and Enhance Recovery (ProSPER), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Elias H. Pratt
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Program to Support People and Enhance Recovery (ProSPER), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jessie Gu
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Program to Support People and Enhance Recovery (ProSPER), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Isaretta L. Riley
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Kimberly S. Johnson
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | |
Collapse
|