Assessing Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Home Health Care: Perceptions and Attitudes of Nurses

Nursing care of transgender persons: A systematic mapping study

AIM

To identify, organize, and report findings of published literature related to the delivery of nursing care for transgender people.

BACKGROUND

Transgender people describe negative interactions with healthcare providers, which have led to delayed care and suboptimal health outcomes. Nurses report being unprepared to care for transgender patients despite published standards for delivery of gender-affirming care. Previous studies indicate focused transgender nursing care education improves positive healthcare experiences and reducing disparities for transgender people.

DESIGN

A systematic mapping strategy was employed to perform this mapping study.

METHODS

Using the search terms transgender, transgendered, gender-nonconforming, nonbinary, gender identity, nursing care, nurse attitudes, health care delivery/disparities, patient-centered care, and gender-affirming care a literature search was completed within CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE Complete, and Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection. Of 1250 articles identified, duplicates were removed before the titles, abstracts, and full text were screened for relevance.

RESULTS

A final sample of thirteen studies focusing on transgender patient care, practicing nurses' experiences, and nurse education was analyzed. The findings confirmed a dearth of primary research related to nursing care of transgender people.

CONCLUSIONS

Little research has been conducted in the last five years regarding nursing care provided to transgender people and nurse education regarding aspects of transgender and gender-affirming care. Despite increased research, innovative interventions remain imperative to address the gap in nursing education regarding gender-affirming health care.

LGBTQ+ Inclusivity Training and Education: A Toolkit for Skilled Nursing Facilities

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to develop the LGBTQ+ Inclusivity Training and Education (LITE) toolkit and to examine the usability and acceptability of the LITE toolkit to health care workers and staff who work within skilled nursing facilities (SNFs).

DESIGN

A community-engaged approach using human-centered design to develop the LITE toolkit. To test the usability and acceptability of the LITE toolkit, we provided a posttest survey to users after a 9-week period.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The LITE toolkit was distributed to 25 SNFs throughout a 7-county area in North Carolina.

METHODS

Development processes included an LGBTQ+ community advisory board, development of resource topics and a list of best practices, and development of a website. The LITE toolkit comprised a website of LGBTQ+ resources, poster of 6 Best Practices to LGBTQ+ Care, rainbow lapel pins, and writing pens with the LITE logo. Online surveys were distributed to SNF administrators to share with health care workers and staff to collect data on the usability and acceptability of the LITE toolkit. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Fifteen participants completed the survey. Answering all survey questions was not a requirement. Seventy-nine percent (n = 14) of SNF health care workers indicated that the LITE toolkit was "easy to understand" and that they were satisfied with the contents. Fifty-three percent (n = 15) responded that the LITE toolkit would improve the way they care for patients. Sixty-six percent (n = 15) of health care workers and staff strongly agreed the LITE toolkit was applicable to their job role.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Providing useful and acceptable LGBTQ+-focused training and education for members of the SNF community addresses the need for health care worker and staff training to foster equitable care and inclusive environments for the LGBTQ+ older adult community. Additional work focused on understanding the facilitators and barriers to using the LITE toolkit in the SNF setting is needed.

A Qualitative Description of Direct Care Workers of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Older Adults

Purpose: The aim of the study was to examine direct care worker (DCW) perceptions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) older adults living in long-term care, assisted living, and home health settings. DCWs provide the closest interaction with LGBT older adults in these settings. The perceptions DCWs have toward LGBT older adults is important because the quality of care can be influenced by negative attitudes. Methodology: Qualitative description was used to synthesize what is known about DCWs' perceptions toward LGBT older adults. Results: The overarching theme, "Care is Different, but Not my Care," was supported by the categories Cues of Stereotyping, Cues of Prejudice, and DCWs' Social System and Reported Care. Application: Specific implications for practice (i.e., training, recruitment, retention strategies) and policy (i.e., mandated staffing ratios, pay) are explicated to guide future interventions to ensure equitable, quality care in health care.

A secondary mixed methods analysis examining midwives' responses regarding patient sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) disclosure

OBJECTIVE

Recent research suggests that midwives generally have positive attitudes towards sexual and gender minority (SGM) clients; however, little research has examined whether and how these attitudes translate into specific clinical practices. In this study, we performed a secondary mixed methods analysis to examine midwives' beliefs and practices regarding the importance of asking and knowing their patients' sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI).

METHODS

A confidential, anonymous paper survey was mailed to all midwifery practice groups (n = 131) in Ontario, Canada. Participants were midwives who were members of the Association of Ontario Midwives who responded to the survey (n = 267). Sequential explanatory mixed methods analysis was employed: quantitative SOGI questions were analyzed first, followed by qualitative open response comments to explain and contextualize the quantitative findings.

FINDINGS

Midwives' responses indicated that it was not important to know or ask about clients' SOGI because (1) it is not necessary to be able to provide the best care to everyone, and (2) the onus is on the client to disclose SOGI. Midwives indicated that they would like more training and knowledge to be able to confidently care for SGM.

KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Midwives' hesitancy to ask or know SOGI demonstrates that positive attitudes do not necessarily translate into current best practices for obtaining SOGI data in the context of SGM care provision. Midwifery education and training programs should address this gap.

Healthcare Worker Perceptions of LGBTQ+ Older Adults: Integrative Review

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) older adults (OAs) may require care in long-term care (LTC), assisted living, and home health settings. Healthcare workers' (HCWs, e.g., registered nurses, social workers, certified nursing assistants, home health aides) perceptions and attitudes could influence care, health disparities, and outcomes. The aim of this integrative review was to discover what is known about HCWs' perceptions toward LGBTQ+ OAs. Searched databases included PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Quality review assessment was conducted separately by two reviewers; Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed. A total of 370 studies were identified; 10 studies were included in the review. Five studies were quantitative, four were qualitative, and one was a mixed methods study. Major themes included preparedness/training, responsibility of disclosure, and clinical practice. HCW's perceptions may be associated with discriminatory care and health disparities in the LGBTQ+ OA population.

Interactions Between Health Professionals and Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Patients in Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review

The ways in which health professionals (HPs) interact with individuals from sexual minorities can impact their perception of the health service and influence engagement. This systematic literature review aimed to identify and synthesize the qualitative literature exploring interactions between HPs and lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) patients in healthcare settings. A search strategy was developed and applied to CINAHL and Medline, inclusion criteria were then applied to results by two screeners with good agreement. Thematic analysis was carried out on papers meeting the inclusion criteria in three stages, beginning with coding the text line-by-line, developing descriptive themes and finally, analytical themes. Electronic searches identified 348 papers with 20 of these meeting the inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis found five themes; HPs' lack of knowledge regarding LGB specific issues, identification of sexual orientation, discomfort in interactions, LGB patients' experience of heteronormative attitudes and perceived judgment or other negative attitudes.

Primary Healthcare Nurse’s Barriers and Facilitators to Providing Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare Services of LGBTQI Individuals: A Qualitative Study

In most cases, we only hear Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals, Transgender, Queer, and Intersex (LGBTQI) patients complaining about nurses being the reason for not accessing and utilizing healthcare services; for example, studies reports on the different attitudes of healthcare providers including nurses against LGBTQI patients. However, factors influencing the behavior of South African Primary Healthcare (PHC) Nurses toward LGBTQI patients are rarely reported. The study aimed to explore how PHC nurses experienced and perceived sexual and reproductive health services for LGBTQI individuals in Tshwane, Gauteng Province, South Africa. The study followed qualitative research using an exploratory design approach. The sample included 27 PHC nurses from Tshwane, Gauteng Province, South Africa. In-depth face-to-face interviews were coded and analyzed using Thematic Content Analysis (TCA) which included five interrelated steps. The results revealed three main themes: barriers to the provision of LGBTQI-related SRHS, facilitators for the provision of SRHS to LGBTQI individuals, and strategies to improve LGBTQI individuals’ SRHS accessibility and availability. Common barriers were related to the institutions, PHC nurses, the general public, and LGBTQI patients themselves. Regardless of the challenges faced by PHC nurses, there were some enabling factors that pushed them to continue rendering SHRS to LGBTQI patients who came to their clinics. Almost all PHC nurses suggested the importance of awareness, transparency, collaboration, and the need for training related to LGBTQI healthcare issues.

“I need more knowledge”: Qualitative analysis of oncology providers’ experiences with sexual and gender minority patients

Background

While societal acceptance for sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals is increasing, this group continues to face barriers to quality healthcare. Little is known about clinicians’ experiences with SGM patients in the oncology setting. To address this, a mixed method survey was administered to members of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group.

Materials and methods

We report results from the open-ended portion of the survey. Four questions asked clinicians to describe experiences with SGM patients, reservations in caring for them, suggestions for improvement in SGM cancer care, and additional comments. Data were analyzed using content analysis and the constant comparison method.

Results

The majority of respondents noted they had no or little familiarity with SGM patients. A minority of respondents noted experience with gay and lesbian patients, but not transgender patients; many who reported experience with transgender patients also noted difficulty navigating the correct use of pronouns. Many respondents also highlighted positive experiences with SGM patients. Suggestions for improvement in SGM cancer care included providing widespread training, attending to unique end-of-life care issues among SGM patients, and engaging in efforts to build trust.

Conclusion

Clinicians have minimal experiences with SGM patients with cancer but desire training. Training the entire workforce may improve trust with, outreach efforts to, and cancer care delivery to the SGM community.