Maternal Support Is Protective Against Suicidal Ideation Among a Diverse Cohort of Young Transgender Women

Why do adolescents attempt suicide? Insights from leading ideation-to-action suicide theories: a systematic review

Suicide is a leading cause of death among adolescents, and recent suicide theories have sought to clarify the factors that facilitate the transition from suicide ideation to action. Specifically, the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide (IPTS), Integrated Motivational-Volitional Model (IMV), and Three Step Theory (3ST) have highlighted risk factors central to the formation of suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviors, which is necessary for suicide death. However, these models were initially developed and tested among adults, and given core socioemotional and neurodevelopmental differences in adolescents, the applicability of these models remains unclear. Directly addressing this gap in knowledge, this systematic review aimed to (1) describe the evidence of leading ideation-to-action theories (i.e., IPTS, IMV, 3ST) as they relate to suicide risk among adolescents, (2) integrate ideation-to-action theories within prevailing biological frameworks of adolescent suicide, and (3) provide recommendations for future adolescent suicide research. Overall, few studies provided a complete test of models in adolescent samples, and empirical research testing components of these theories provided mixed support. Future research would benefit from integrating neurodevelopmental and developmentally sensitive psychosocial frameworks to increase the applicability of ideation-to-action theories to adolescents. Further, utilizing real-time monitoring approaches may serve to further clarify the temporal association among risk factors and suicide.

Randomized-controlled trials are methodologically inappropriate in adolescent transgender healthcare

Background

Despite multiple rigorous observational studies documenting the association between positive mental health outcomes and access to puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and transition-related surgeries among adolescents, some jurisdictions have banned or are attempting to ban gender-affirming medical interventions for minors due to an absence of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) proving their mental health benefits.

Methods

This article critically reviews whether RCTs are methodologically appropriate for studying the association between adolescent gender-affirming care and mental health outcomes.

Results

The scientific value of RCTs is severely impeded when studying the impact of gender-affirming care on the mental health of trans adolescent. Gender-affirming interventions have physiologically evident effects and are highly desired by participants, giving rise to concerns over adherence, drop-out, response bias, and generalizability. Complementary and well-designed observational studies can instead be used to ground reliable recommendations for clinical practice and policymaking in adolescent trans healthcare, without the need for RCTs.

Conclusion

The lack of RCTs on the mental health impacts of gender-affirming care for trans adolescents does not entail that gender-affirming interventions are based on insufficient evidence. Given the methodological limitations of RCTs, complementary and well-designed observational studies offer more reliable scientific evidence than RCTs and should be considered of sufficient quality to guide clinical practice and policymaking.

Impact of Social Support on Suicidal Ideation and Attempts Among Gender Minority Adults

This study examined the impact of social support from family, non-gender minority friends, gender minority friends, and religious groups on suicidal ideation, suicide attempt history, and the number of suicide attempts. Researchers hypothesized that these types of social support were associated with lower suicidal thoughts and behaviors. This research is a secondary analysis of the Virginia Transgender Health Initiative Survey (THIS) data set (N = 350). Logistic regressions assessed suicidal ideation and attempts. Linear regression assessed the number of suicide attempts. Age was a covariate in all analyses. Social support from family (B = -.419, SE = .119, p < .001) was negatively associated with suicidal ideation and was not associated with an attempt history or number of attempts. This finding suggests that increasing social support from family may be an important factor to consider for suicide prevention for gender minority individuals.

Mental health in transgender individuals: a systematic review

Several lines of evidence indicate the prevalence of mental health disorders in Transgender (TG) individuals is higher than that of cisgender individuals or the general population. In this systematic review, we aim to propose a summary of some of the most significant research investigating mental health disorders' prevalence among this population. We performed a double-blind systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting (PRISMA) on PUBMED/MEDLINE and SCOPUS, specifically using peer-reviewed articles examining the mental health status of transgender (TG) individuals. This review did not exclude any research based on publication date. The last search was performed in February 2022. The employed search strategy led to the selection of 165 peer-reviewed articles. The majority of these papers presented a cross-sectional design with self-reported diagnoses and symptoms, signaling a significant prevalence of mental health disorders amongst TG Individuals. Of the reviewed articles, 72 examined the prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders; 8 examined eating disorders; 43 examined the prevalence of suicidal or self-harm ideation or behaviors; 5 papers examined the prevalence of trauma and stress-related disorders; 10 examined the frequency of personality disorders; 44 examined substance use disorders; and 9 papers examined the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder. Finally, 22 studies reported on the prevalence of TG individuals diagnosed with co-morbid mental health disorders or unspecified mental disorders. Our findings coincide with existing research, which indicates TG individuals do experience a higher prevalence of mental health disorders than that of the general population or cisgender individuals. However, further research is needed to address the existing gaps in knowledge.

Associations Between Social Support Availability and HIV Risk and Protective Factors in a U.S. Sample of Adults with Diverse Transgender Identities

Purpose: There is conflicting evidence on how different types of social support may attenuate human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk or may even promote health behaviors in transgender (trans) and nonbinary populations. Drawing on Social Support Theory, we assessed associations between emotional, instrumental, and informational social support and HIV risk and protective factors in a U.S. sample of trans and nonbinary adults. We investigated whether such associations differed for trans men, trans women, and nonbinary individuals. Methods: Data were drawn from the Transgender Stress and Health Study, an online survey (N = 300), conducted in 2014-2015. We used Poisson regressions to measure the relationship between social support availability and HIV testing, substance use, and sexual risk behaviors for each gender subgroup. Results: Multivariate analyses revealed that, controlling for social support availability, nonbinary individuals were less likely to report past year HIV testing (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.89) than trans men (ref). Instrumental support availability was associated with substance use (IRR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.01-1.6), and this association was stronger for trans women (IRR = 2.1; 95% CI 1.1-4.04). Trans women were more likely to report sexual risk behavior across all types of social support, controlling for social support availability. Conclusion: We found key differences in social support availability, HIV testing, substance use, and sexual risk behavior. Our results suggest that trans men, trans women, and nonbinary individuals may have unique HIV prevention needs, and should be treated as distinct study groups in further research.