Bloodstream Infections due to Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Single-Center Retrospective Study on Risk Factors and Therapy Options

Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Patients with Bacteremia or Nosocomial Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a combination of the third-generation cephalosporin ceftazidime and the novel, non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam that is approved for the treatment of pediatric (≥ 3 months) and adult patients with complicated infections including hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP), and bacteremia. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022362856) aimed to provide a quantitative and qualitative synthesis to evaluate the effectiveness of CAZ-AVI in treating adult patients with bacteremia or nosocomial pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (non metallo-β-lactamase-producing strains) and multi-drug resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

METHODS

The databases included in the search, until November 7, 2022, were Embase and PubMed. A total of 24 studies (retrospective: 22, prospective: 2) with separate outcomes for patients with bacteremia or pneumonia were included.

RESULTS

The outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality, clinical cure, and microbiological cure. Qualitative (24 studies) and quantitative (8/24 studies) syntheses were performed. The quality of the studies was assessed using the MINORS checklist and the overall risk of bias was moderate to high.

CONCLUSIONS

In studies included in the meta-analysis, lower all-cause mortality for patients with bacteremia (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.19-0.46) and improved rates of clinical cure for patients with bacteremia (OR = 4.90, 95% CI 2.60-9.23) and nosocomial pneumonia (OR = 3.20, 95% CI 1.55-6.60) was observed in the CAZ-AVI group compared with the comparator group. Data provided here may be considered while using CAZ-AVI for the treatment of patients with difficult-to-treat infections.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022362856.

Monotherapy vs combination therapy in patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether mortality is lower in patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection (BSI) who receive combination antimicrobial therapy than in those who receive monotherapy.

METHODS

Two authors independently searched for relevant articles in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases through to August 10, 2023. Risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. Possible sources of heterogeneity were evaluated by meta-regression using a mixed-effects model.

RESULTS

Among 8044 articles screened, there were 23 studies (3443 patients) that were eligible for meta-analysis. Meta-regression analysis identified the proportion of patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) BSI to be a potential source of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis showed that mortality on monotherapy was significantly higher when the proportion of patients with CRKP BSI was ≥50% (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.33-2.30) and significantly lower when this proportion was <50% (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.24-1.24). Overall mortality was significantly higher on tigecycline monotherapy (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.46-5.59) than on combination therapy containing both these agents. There was a trend in favor of colistin/polymyxin B-containing combination therapy (OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.83-2.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination antimicrobial therapy can lower mortality in patients with CRKP but may not show a survival advantage over monotherapy when the proportion of patients with CRKP BSI is <50%. High-quality prospective observational studies are needed because of the high risk of bias and limited data in the studies performed to date.

Ceftazidime-avibactam versus polymyxins in treating patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) pose a significant threat to human health and have emerged as a major public health concern. We aimed to compare the efficacy and the safety of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and polymyxin in the treatment of CRE infections.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching the databases of EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. Published studies on the use of CAZ-AVI and polymyxin in the treatment of CRE infections were collected from the inception of the database until March 2023. Two investigators independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies and extracted the data. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

Ten articles with 833 patients were included (CAZ-AVI 325 patients vs Polymyxin 508 patients). Compared with the patients who received polymyxin-based therapy, the patients who received CAZ-AVI therapy had significantly lower 30-days mortality (RR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.01-2.34; I2 = 22%; P < 0.00001), higher clinical cure rate (RR = 2.70; 95% CI 1.67-4.38; I2 = 40%; P < 0.00001), and higher microbial clearance rate (RR = 2.70; 95% CI 2.09-3.49; I2 = 0%; P < 0.00001). However, there was no statistically difference in the incidence of acute kidney injury between patients who received CAZ-AVI and polymyxin therapy (RR = 1.38; 95% CI 0.69-2.77; I2 = 22%; P = 0.36). In addition, among patients with CRE bloodstream infection, those who received CAZ-AVI therapy had significantly lower mortality than those who received polymyxin therapy (RR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.27-0.69, I2 = 26%, P < 0.00004).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to polymyxin, CAZ-AVI demonstrated superior clinical efficacy in the treatment of CRE infections, suggesting that CAZ-AVI may be a superior option for CRE infections.

Mortality-Related Risk Factors and Novel Antimicrobial Regimens for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) has become a significant public health problem in the last decade. We aimed to explore the risk factors of mortality in patients with CRE infections and to focus on the current evidence on antimicrobial regimens for CRE infections, particularly from the perspective of mortality.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed by searching the databases of EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies that evaluated mortality-related risk factors and antimicrobial regimens for CRE infections published from 2012 to 2022.

RESULTS

In total, 33 and 28 studies were included to analyze risk factors and antibiotic treatment, respectively. The risk factors most frequently reported as significantly associated with CRE mortality were antibiotic use (92.9%; 26/28 studies), comorbidities (88.7%; 23/26 studies), and hospital-related factors (82.8%; 24/29 studies). In 10 studies that did not contain ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) therapy, seven demonstrated significantly lower mortality in combination therapy than in monotherapy. However, 5 of 6 studies identified no substantial difference between CAZ-AVI monotherapy and CAZ-AVI combination therapy. Six studies reported substantially lower mortality in CAZ-AVI regimens than in other regimens.

CONCLUSION

Several risk factors, particularly antibiotic use and patients' comorbidities, are strong risk factors for CRE mortality. The optimal regimen for CRE infections remains controversial. Combination therapy should be considered when carbapenems, colistin, tigecycline, or aminoglycosides are administered. CAZ-AVI appears to be a promising antibiotic for CRE infections. Most importantly, treatment should be individualized according to the source and severity of the disease or other highly related risk factors.

Predictive Value of a Quick Pitt Bacteremia Score for Prognosis of Patients with Bloodstream Infection Secondary to Urinary Tract Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

To analyze the effect of a quick Pitt bacteremia score (qpitt) on the prognosis of patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) secondary to urinary tract infection (UTI) and to further explore its use in aiding appropriate selection of initial antibiotic treatment.

Methods

Medical records of patients with BSIs secondary to UTIs who were admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected. To screen for independent risk factors, logistic analysis was conducted on statistically significant variables. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn with prognosis and death as the state variables to evaluate the predictive value. Patients were grouped by qpitt 2-point cutoff, to explore the impact of initial antimicrobial treatment regimens on poor prognosis and death in different subgroups. Poor prognosis was defined as a hospital length of stay (HLOS) ≥14 days or death within 28 days from BSI onset (ie, 28-day death).

Results

A total of 266 patients were included in this study. In BSIs secondary to UTIs, we observed a pathogenic composition of 77.44% Gram-negative bacteria, 19.55% Gram-positive bacteria, and 3.01% fungi. The qpitt had poor predictive value for poor prognosis [area under ROC (AUROC) = 0.653, p < 0.001], while it had a high predictive value for death (AUROC = 0.890, p < 0.001). For patients with a qpitt ≥2, the poor prognosis and death rates of patients who were initially treated with carbapenem antibiotics were lower (p < 0.01). In comparison, initial treatment with carbapenem antibiotics had no significant effect on prognosis and death rates in patients with qpitt <2 (p > 0.1).

Conclusion

The qpitt is highly predictive for death in patients with BSIs secondary to UTIs and can be used to inform first-line antibiotic treatment strategy.

Risk Factors for Mortality and Outcomes in Hematological Malignancy Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections

Background

This study aimed to identify risk factors for mortality and outcomes in hematological malignancy (HM) patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP).

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital in Henan Province, China, between January 2018 and December 2021. All BSIs caused by CRKP in hospitalized HM patients were identified. Data on patient demographics, disease, laboratory tests, treatment regimens, outcomes of infection, and the antimicrobial susceptibility of each isolate were collected from medical records.

Results

A total of 129 patients with CRKP BSI were included in the study, and the 28-day mortality rate was 80.6% (104/129). In Cox analysis an absolute neutrophil count < 500 at discharge (hazard ratio [HR] 6.386, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.074–13.266, p < 0.001), intensive care unit admission (HR 1.834, 95% CI 1.065–3.157, p = 0.029), and higher Pitt bacteremia score (HR 1.185, 95% CI 1.118–1.255, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors associated with 28-day mortality. Survival curve analysis indicated that compared with ceftazidime-avibactam-based therapy, both polymyxin b (HR 8.175, 95% CI 1.099–60.804, p = 0.040) and tigecycline (HR 14.527, 95% CI 2.000–105.541, p =0.008) were associated with a higher risk of mortality.

Conclusion

In HM patients CRKP BSI resulted in high mortality. Intensive care unit admission, higher Pitt bacteremia score, and absolute neutrophil count < 500 at discharge were independently associated with higher mortality. Early initiation of new agents such as ceftazidime-avibactam may improve outcomes.

Update of clinical application in ceftazidime-avibactam for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria infections

PURPOSE

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) have become a major global public health threat. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a newer combination of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor, with activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). The aim of this review is to describe the recent real-world experience of CAZ-AVI for the infections due to MDR-GNB.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar for clinical application in CAZ-AVI for MDR-GNB infections. Reference lists were reviewed and synthesized for narrative review.

RESULTS

MDRGNB infections are associated with higher mortality significantly comparing to drug-susceptible bacterial infections. Fortunately, CAZ-AVI shows significant benefits for infections due to KPC or OXA-48 CRE, comparing to colistin, carbapenem, aminoglycoside and other older agents, even in those with immunocompromised status. The efficacy of CAZ-AVI varies in different infection sites due to CRE, which is lower in pneumonia. Early use is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Noteworthy, when adopted as salvage therapy, CAZ-AVI is still superior to other GNB active antibiotics. CAZ-AVI plus aztreonam is recommended as the first line of MBL-CRE infections. However, for infections caused by KPC- and OXA-48-producing isolates, further investigations are needed to demonstrate the benefit of combination therapy. Besides CRE, CAZ-AVI is also active to MDR-PA. However, the development of resistance in CRE and MDR-PA against CAZ-AVI is alarming, and more investigations and studies are needed to prevent, diagnose, and treat infections due to CAZ-AVI-resistant pathogens.

CONCLUSIONS

CAZ-AVI appears to be a valuable therapeutic option in MDR-GNB infections. Using CAZ-AVI appropriately to improve efficacy and decrease the emergence of resistance is important.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam as Salvage Therapy in Pediatric Liver Transplantation Patients with Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales

Objective

There are few therapeutic options for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) in children following liver transplantation. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), a recently licensed antibacterial in China, was utilized as a salvage therapy against CRE in our center, and its efficacy and safety were therefore assessed.

Methods

The retrospective, observational study was conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University. Pediatric liver transplantation patients (≤12 years) who received CAZ-AVI as a salvage therapy against CRE infections were included from January 2020 to December 2021. Clinical success and all-cause death during hospitalization were the primary outcomes. Recurrence of infection, drug-related adverse events, and changes in inflammatory biomarkers were collected.

Results

Six children were enrolled, with a median age of 10.1 (interquartile range (IQR) 5.5–13.8) months. Primary intraperitoneal infections occurred in all patients, with five patients developing bloodstream infections. KPC carbapenemases were detected in most isolates, and the susceptibility results showed general sensitivity to tigecycline, polymyxin B, and CAZ-AVI. Tigecycline-based therapy was taken as the initial treatment and withdrawn because of clinical failure (5 cases) or cholestasis (1 case). After CRE infection, the median time to convert to CAZ-AVI was 7.5 (IQR 7.0–8.8) days, and the median CAZ-AVI treatment length was 21.0 (IQR 20.3–28.5) days. Clinical success was achieved in all patients, with a zero percent all-cause death rate. No CRE infections recurred throughout hospitalization, and no resistance to CAZ-AVI was detected. Patients experienced vomiting (1/6), skin rash (1/6), and a transient increase in cystatin C (2/6), γ-glutamyltransferase (2/6), and alkaline phosphatase (3/6).

Conclusion

CAZ-AVI was shown to be a successful salvage treatment for CRE infection in pediatric liver transplant recipients, with minor and temporary drug-related side effects.

Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Several clinicians use ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) to treat bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), although no conclusive data support this practice. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI in the treatment of CRE bacteremia. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched until 5 November 2021. Studies comparing the clinical outcome of CAZ-AVI with other regimens in CRE BSI were included if they reported data on mortality. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences with accompanying 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Eleven articles with 1,205 patients were included. CAZ-AVI groups showed a significantly lower 30-day mortality than control groups of other regimens (RR = 0.55, 95% CI of 0.45 to 0.68, P < 0.00001). The result is robust when a colistin-based regimen serves as the control group (RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.33 of 0.69, P < 0.0001). In subgroup meta-analyses, the 30-day mortality was significantly lower in patients infected with CRE producing Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (RR = 0.59, 95% CI of 0.46 to 0.75, P < 0.0001). Additionally, patients in CAZ-AVI groups had a significantly higher clinical cure rate (RR = 1.75, 95% CI of 1.57 to 2.18, P < 0.00001) and lower nephrotoxicity rate (RR = 0.41, 95% CI of 0.20 to 0.84, P = 0.02). No significant differences of relapse rates were demonstrated in 2 groups (RR = 0.69, 95% CI of 0.29 to 1.66, P = 0.41). Although the current study is based on observational studies with a small sample of participants, the findings suggest that CAZ-AVI treatment is effective and safe compared with other antibiotics, including colistin, in CRE BSI.

IMPORTANCE Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has been used as a frontline agent in the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections. However, the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) bloodstream infections (BSIs) remain unclear. Patients with CRE BSIs were often enrolled in small-sized clinical studies, together with other sites of infections, which reported pooled results. In this meta-analysis, the efficacy and safety were compared between CAZ-AVI and any other regimens used against CRE infections. The findings suggest that patients in the CAZ-AVI group had a significantly lower 30-day mortality than any other regimens and than colistin-based regimens. This paper provides a rationale for the use of CAZ-AVI in one of the most urgent antimicrobial-resistant infections of CRE bloodstream infections.

Adipose tissue is a predictor of 30-days mortality in patients with bloodstream infection caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

Background

Prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) bloodstream infection with high mortality has attached physicians' attention. High visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and high subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) were confirmed by previous studies that were closely related to increased pneumonia severity, more complications, and higher mortality in COVID-19. Thus, we speculate that CT-quantified body composition may also be connected to all-cause mortality and bacterial clearance in patients with CRKP bloodstream infection (BSI).

Methods

We investigated the associations of CT-quantified body composition with the mortality of CRKP bloodstream infectious patients. All CT images were obtained at the level of the L3/4 spinal level. The prognostic value of the body composition was analyzed using the Cox regression model, and precise clinical nomograms were established.

Results

72 eligible patients both suffered from CRKP bloodstream infection and performed abdominopelvic CT were included. Factors associated with 30-day all-in hospital mortality included total adipose tissue (TAT) [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.028, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.003–1.053; P = 0.025], age [HR = 1.030, 95% CI, 1.000–1.061; P = 0.047] and SOFA scores [HR = 1.138, 95% CI 1.049–1.263; P = 0.002]. Compared with low-VAT, patients with high-VAT show a strikingly poor prognosis in both 30-day all-cause mortality (P = 0.0108, Fig. 2A) and 30-day CRKP BSI mortality (P = 0.0049, Fig. 2C). The results of TAT were similar to VAT.

Conclusions

Our study suggested that CT-derived body composition could be a credible and effective alternative to assess the prognosis of patients with BSI owing to CRKP. CT-quantified TAT, age, and SOFA scores were independently associated with 30-day all-cause mortality in these severe infectious patients, while skeletal muscle did not have obvious statistical significance.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Serious Gram-Negative Infections with Limited Treatment Options: A Systematic Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

A systematic literature review was undertaken to evaluate real-world use of ceftazidime-avibactam for infections due to aerobic Gram-negative organisms in adults with limited treatment options.

METHODS

Literature searches retrieved peer-reviewed publications and abstracts from major international infectious disease congresses from January 2015 to February 2021. Results were screened using pre-defined criteria to limit the dataset to relevant publications (notable exclusions were paediatric data and outcomes data for bacteria intrinsically resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam). Data for included publications were subjected to qualitative synthesis.

RESULTS

Seventy-three relevant publications (62 peer-reviewed articles; 10 abstracts) comprising 1926 patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam (either alone or combined with other antimicrobials) and 1114 comparator/control patients were identified. All patients were hospitalised for serious illness and most had multiple comorbidities. The most common infections were pneumonia, bacteraemia, and skin/soft tissue, urinary tract, or abdominal infections; smaller numbers of patients with meningitis, febrile neutropenia, osteomyelitis, and cystic fibrosis were also included. Carbapenem-resistant or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CRE; n = 1718) and carbapenem-resistant, multidrug-resistant (MDR), and extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 150) were the most common pathogens. Most publications reported positive outcomes for ceftazidime-avibactam treatment (clinical success rates ranged from 45 to 100% and reported 30-day mortality from 0 to 63%), which were statistically superior versus comparators in some studies. ceftazidime-avibactam resistance emergence occurred infrequently and mostly in Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae strains.

CONCLUSION

This review provides qualitative evidence of successful use of ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of hospitalised patients with CRE and MDR P. aeruginosa infections with limited treatment options.

Risk Factors of 30-Day All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection

An optimal antimicrobial regimen for the treatment of patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) bloodstream infection (BSI) is currently unavailable. This study aimed to identify the appropriate antibiotics and the risk factors of all-cause mortality for CRKP BSI patients. This retrospective cohort study included the hospitalized patients with CRKP BSI. Primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors of 30-day mortality. A total of 89 patients were included with a 30-day mortality of 52.1%. A total of 52 (58.4%) patients were treated with appropriate antimicrobial regimens and 58 (65.2%) isolates carried bla_KPC-2 genes. Microbiologic eradication within 7 days (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.09, p < 0.001), platelet count (per 1 × 10⁴/mm³, adjusted HR = 0.95, p = 0.002), and Pitt bacteremia scores (adjusted HR = 1.40, p < 0.001) were independently associated with 30-day all-cause mortality. No effective antimicrobial regimens were identified. In conclusion, risk factors of 30-day mortality in patients with CRKP BSI included microbiologic eradication > 7 days, lower platelet count, and a higher Pitt bacteremia score. These findings render a new insight into the clinical landscape of CRKP BSI.

A Comparative Study of the Microbiological Efficacy of Polymyxin B on Different Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Infections

Objective: The emergence of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) has brought great challenges to clinical anti-infection treatment around the world. Polymyxins are often considered as the last line of defense in the treatment of CR-GNB infections. In this study, we explored the microbiological efficacy of Polymyxin B (PMB) on different CR-GNB infections as well as the factors influencing microbiological efficacy. Methods: CR-GNB infected patients with PMB-based regimens were enrolled. Clinical and microbiological data were collected from the medical electronic record system of the Second Xiangya hospital. The efficacy of PMB on different CR-GNB was evaluated by the clearance rate at 7-days and within the course of treatment, as well as the 30-day mortality rate. Results: A total of 294 CR-GNB infected patients were enrolled: 154 CR-Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), 55 CR-Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP), and 85 CR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). The CRAB group had the highest 7-day bacterial clearance rate [(CRAB: 39.0%) vs. (CRKP: 29.4%) vs. (CRPA: 14.5%), P = 0.003] and total bacterial clearance rate [(CRAB: 49.0%) vs. (CRKP: 39.8%) vs. (CRPA: 18.2%), P < 0.001] among the three groups, while the bacterial clearance rate of the CRPA group was the lowest. Multivariate logistic regression showed that the differences among the three groups were multiple CR-GNB infections (P = 0.004), respiratory infections (P = 0.001), PMB resistance (P < 0.001), and the combination of tigecycline (P < 0.001). Binary logistic regression showed that multiple CR-GNB infection [(7-day bacterial clearance: P = 0.004) & (total bacterial clearance: P = 0.011)] and bacterial species [(7-day bacterial clearance: P < 0.001) & (total bacterial clearance: P < 0.001)] were independent risk factors for microbiological efficacy. Conclusion: PMB exhibited differential microbiological efficacy on different types of CR-GNB infections; it had the best effect on CRAB, followed by CRKP and CRPA. Multiple CR-GNB infections and bacterial species were independent risk factors for microbiological efficacy.